Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Funding a terrorist act deserves a felony charge, bill says

Rep. Keith Franke discusses a bill he sponsors, HF1475, with the House Public Safety and Security Policy and Finance Committee March 16. It would create a felony crime to solicit or provide support for an act of terrorism. Photo by Paul Battaglia
Rep. Keith Franke discusses a bill he sponsors, HF1475, with the House Public Safety and Security Policy and Finance Committee March 16. It would create a felony crime to solicit or provide support for an act of terrorism. Photo by Paul Battaglia

In a world where terroristic acts are seemingly plentiful, Rep. Keith Franke (R-St. Paul Park) sponsors a bill he hopes would detract someone from being part of such a deed.

HF1475, as amended, would establish a felony offense for someone who “raises, solicits, collects, or provides material support or resources” that would be used to plan, carry out or aid “an act of terrorism or the concealment of, or an escape from, an act of terrorism.” A guilty party could be fined up to $30,000 and imprisoned up to 15 years.

The bill, which has no Senate companion, was held over Thursday by the House Public Safety and Security Policy and Finance Committee for possible omnibus bill inclusion.

“The idea comes from let’s just put something on the books for the State of Minnesota. It’d put a tool in the toolbox,” Franke said. He said no objections have been raised by representatives for law enforcement and county attorneys.

WATCH House Public Safety and Security Policy and Finance Committee discussion of the bill 

Rep. Debra Hilstrom (DFL-Brooklyn Center) supports the bill, but expressed concern about a definition of act of terrorism to include “influence the policy of a unit of government by intimidation or coercion.”

“I just want to make sure we’re getting at the very acts we’re interested in, and not the very acts that sometimes people say in the heat of anger,” she said.

In an effort to not effect freedom of speech, the bill defines coercion as “compulsion by physical force or threat of physical force.”

Franke said the intent is to not hold government hostage in any way. An example would be someone threatening to kidnap a decision-maker’s family if they don’t vote a certain way.

A fiscal note indicates there would be little, if any, cost because prosecution would most likely be done by the federal government.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Legislature — with budget incomplete — gavels out, prepares for special session
House Speaker Lisa Demuth and Republican Floor Leader Harry Niska speak with the media following the May 19 end of the regular legislative session. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) Some years, state legislative sessions surge to a climax on their final day, a flurry of activity providing a sustained adrenaline rush, culminating in smiles of satisfaction as...
Walz, lawmakers strike budget deal in session's final days
Gov. Tim Walz and three of four legislative leaders announce a bipartisan agreement on biennial budget targets during a May 15 press conference. (Photo by Andrew VonBank) With five days to go in the 2025 session, three of four legislative leaders announced a budget agreement Thursday that would sunset unemployment insurance for hourly school empl...