Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House passes four-part omnibus supplemental finance bill

Committee and division chairs introduce their respective sections of the omnibus supplemental finance bill Thursday. Photos by Andrew VonBank
Committee and division chairs introduce their respective sections of the omnibus supplemental finance bill Thursday. Photos by Andrew VonBank

After rolling four omnibus bills into a single piece of legislation last week, House members endured a marathon floor session debating that bill Thursday, spending more than 10 hours and voting two dozen amendments up or down before passing the omnibus supplemental finance bill, as amended, 77-49.

Sponsored by Rep. Jim Knoblach (R-St. Cloud), HF4099/SF3656* is comprised of the omnibus agriculture, environment and natural resources, job growth and energy affordability, and state government finance bills.

By combining those four bills, the House has begun to align its position with the Senate, which merged its omnibus legislation into one bill that was passed 34-31 April 26. The House approved a delete-all amendment to substitute its language into that Senate file.

The amended bill now returns to the Senate, where Sen. Julie Rosen (R-Vernon Center) is the sponsor. Assuming that body does not concur with the changes early next week, a conference committee is expected to try and work out the differences.

As might be expected, the House debate covered a range of topics. A sampling: gerrymandering; pollinators; junkets; chronic wasting disease; attorney fees; water quality; unemployment benefits; energy storage; building codes; wage inequity; and electromagnetic pulse attacks.

And, as also might be expected, opinions of the bill differed pretty evenly along party lines.

Rep. Pat Garofalo (R-Farmington) said in a statement the bill funds important initiatives and he looks forward to working with Gov. Mark Dayton “to come to a final agreement on a package that we can all support.”

But House Minority Leader Melissa Hortman (DFL-Brooklyn Park) said Republicans had chosen to hold the good policy in the bill hostage to the bad policy. 

“This is a very frustrating bill,” Hortman said. “There are many provisions in this bill that, if they stood on their own, they would fly off this floor with wide bipartisan support. But there are many other provisions that are just poison pills. The governor has already said he will veto them.”

WATCH: First part of omnibus bill debate

WATCH: Second part of omnibus bill debate 

WATCH: Third part of omnibus bill debate

WATCH: Fourth part of omnibus bill debate 


The agriculture articles contain a variety of provisions that have widespread bipartisan support. They include a $217,000 increase for statewide mental health counseling services for farm families and businesses that would help fund an additional counselor position – making two statewide, and another $30,000 for the Farm Advocates program.

Rep. Jim Knoblach introduces the omnibus supplemental finance bill on the House floor Thursday. Photo by Andrew VonBank

Rep. Paul Anderson (R-Starbuck), who chairs the House Agriculture Policy Committee, said most of the $250,000 the House agriculture committees were given to spend went to address mental health issues arising in recent years from depressed commodity prices and other pressures.

“It’s a good bill, it spends the limited funds we have wisely,” Anderson said.

The bill also contains $35 million for the Rural Finance Authority, which works with local lenders to offer a number of loan programs to help those looking to get their start in agriculture along with established farmers who may need to refinance or make other substantial capital investments. Authority funding is also traveling in a separate bill, HF4425, sent to the floor Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee.  

The most controversial provision in the bill would prohibit the Department of Agriculture from adopting new nitrogen rules proposed by Gov. Mark Dayton – which would restrict fertilizer application in some parts of the state during the fall – unless they are specifically approved by law.

“When the Department of Agriculture finishes its work, it simply has to come back here to the Legislature, probably in January, before that rule goes into effect,” Anderson said.

However, Rep. Jeanne Poppe (DFL-Austin) did not agree.

“The ag finance portion of this bill is a good bill,” Poppe said. “But the controversial [nitrogen] provision … should be removed.”

The same nitrogen language is also included in HF2887, passed by the House on April 16. The governor has promised to veto that bill if it reaches his desk. 

One amendment pertaining to the agriculture portion of the bill was adopted.

Rep. Jim Newberger (R-Becker) offered the amendment saying it would allow individuals in the cottage foods industry to register as limited liability corporations in order to buy liability insurance. Doing so would allow those people protections against “losing everything in the event of a catastrophic lawsuit” Newberger said.

Among the other major agriculture policy provisions and appropriations in the bill are those that would:

  • extend the Minnesota Agricultural Fertilizer Research and Education Council, the education program it administers, the fertilizer surcharge and the account that holds that surcharge, all by 10 years, to June 2030;
  • modify the definition of renewable chemical when determining eligibility for the Renewable Chemical Production Incentive Program and the Biomass Thermal Production Incentive Program;
  • require the Agriculture Department to issue payments to renewable chemical producers under the renewable chemical production program, after certain conditions are met;
  • authorize Second Harvest Heartland to use up to 15 percent of a distribution grant for administration and transportation costs without having to match that money;
  • allow the Agriculture Department to reimburse University of Minnesota Extension employees who handle claims related to livestock killed or crippled by wolves;
  • establish a new RFA loan program, and loan criteria, to explore the feasibility of new renewable energy projects;
  • make several modifications to the Advanced Biofuel Incentive Program, including the minimum production level and biomass sourcing requirements; and
  • add aquaculture to the definition of specialty crops available for RFA microloans.


Environment and Natural Resources

Rep. Rick Hansen debates an amendment to the environment and natural resources portion of the omnibus supplemental finance bill. Photo by Andrew VonBank

The environment and natural resources articles originated in HF3502, sponsored by Rep. Dan Fabian (R-Roseau). The bill would make a number of policy changes and appropriate $750,000 to address chronic wasting disease — the bill’s lone General Fund increase.

DFL members criticized the proposal, arguing that it fails to address important issues such as water quality and serves special interests instead of the general public.

“You shouldn’t have to pay a lobbyist to have your position heard,” said Rep. Rick Hansen (DFL-South St. Paul).

Fabian pushed back on that accusation.

“The farmers in my district, they belong to organizations. They’re stakeholders. They belong to a group and they have a voice down here,” Fabian said. “…This is a good bill, people. Is everything in here perfect? No, it’s not. But this is a good bill for the environment and for the people of the State of Minnesota.”

Rep. Jamie Becker-Finn (DFL-Roseville) unsuccessfully offered an amendment to eliminate a provision that would allow the Department of Natural Resources’ commissioner to invite two fish managers to attend all meetings of the 1837 Ceded Territory Fisheries Technical Committee, which is comprised of biologists and representatives of the DNR and eight Chippewa bands.

Becker-Finn said the Legislature does not have the authority to impose alterations on an agreement between two sovereign parties.

“This amendment removes language that is, at best, a bad idea and, at worst, a violation of the Constitution of the United States of America,” Becker-Finn said. “If I’ve learned anything in my time here in this body it is that many of you lack understanding of tribal sovereignty and lack understanding of our constitution beyond one or two amendments.”

An amendment offered by Hansen to remove a provision that would allow individuals to possess feral swine they’ve shot was also rejected. Hansen argued that the approach could actually work against eradicating feral swine from Minnesota.

“Assigning a value to those hogs, I believe, is too great of a risk,” Hansen said.

A number of policy changes are proposed. Among them are those that would:

  • prohibit the Pollution Control Agency from enforcing the state’s longstanding wild rice water quality standard without going through a new rulemaking process;
  • establish an account in the remediation fund for the $850 million settlement following the state’s lawsuit with 3M Company. The amount available after legal expenses, an estimated $720 million, would be appropriated to the PCA and DNR to enhance the quality and sustainability of the drinking water in some parts of the eastern Twin Cities metropolitan area;
  • prohibit the PCA from increasing fees for certain water-related activities and require the agency to submit a report to the Legislature on water quality permit fee revenues;
  • require PCA water quality standards to prove scientific basis and undergo external, scientific peer review;
  • require the DNR to alter the website where residents purchase hunting and fishing licenses to include voter registration eligibility requirements and a description of how to register to vote. Those measures, in addition to a voter registration application, would also be included in the department’s printed and digital hunting, fishing and trapping regulations;
  • modify statutes determining financial assistance appropriation to local governments for water and soil projects. The bill would center the process around a watershed-based approach instead of current performance-based guidelines;
  • modify drainage law to accelerate ditch buffer strip implementation; and
  • revoke snowmobile and ATV privileges following a DWI conviction.


State Government

While Republicans touted the state government finance portion of the bill as a win for veterans and cybersecurity, DFL criticism focused on reductions to state agencies – including a $3.88 million spending reduction to the Department of Revenue and a $1.4 million reduction to the Department of Human Rights – and proposed reforms to legislative redistricting.

Sections included in what was HF4016, sponsored by Rep. Sarah Anderson (R-Plymouth), would transfer $26 million from the Stadium Reserve Fund to the General Fund to build new veterans homes in Bemidji, Montevideo and Preston; a requirement for state agencies to dedicate 3.5 percent of their budget to cybersecurity; and a requirement for state agencies to reduce their collective budgets by $9.65 million to help cover the cost of the beleaguered MNLARS program.

“We are asking state government to streamline by a percent of 0.5 percent. We are only asking state agencies to try to do things with a little less -- of 0.5 percent,” Anderson said. “I think the average Joe Minnesotan is doing more in looking at their budget than 0.5 percent.”

This 107-page slice of the larger 324-page omnibus bill represents a $7 million overall reduction to state government spending.

Rep. Liz Olson (DFL-Duluth) said she was “deeply troubled” with the bill because it would result in state employee reductions, cuts in services and a less-responsive government. Calling it a “poison pill,” Olson insinuated the governor would veto it and the House would have to return to work on the bill.

“We’re talking about real people’s lives in every single one of our districts,” Olson said. “Every single one of our districts will be affected.”

Other spending changes would include:

  • transferring $4 million from the Stadium Reserve Fund to the General Fund to establish a sexual harassment investigations office for state employees within Minnesota Management and Budget;
  • $1 million to the Minnesota Historical Society for digital preservation;
  • a $1.24 million reduction to the Department of Administration, including a $525,000 transfer of the Data Practices Office into the Office of Administrative Hearings;
  • a $140,000 reduction to the state auditor’s office to pay Becker and Wright counties for a lawsuit challenging a 2015 law; and
  • an expected $10,000-per-year revenue loss to the Board of Cosmetology by repealing hair braiders and eyelash extension technician licensing requirements.

Rep. Mike Freiberg (DFL-Golden Valley) unsuccessfully offered an amendment to remove a provision that would limit the attorney general’s office’s ability to enter into contingency fee contracts, like the one in the 3M lawsuit. Freiberg said the section he was looking to eliminate would “deprive” residents throughout the state protections citizens in the east metro received under that lawsuit.


Jobs, Energy and Housing

The jobs, energy and housing articles in the massive bill originated in HF4289, sponsored by Garofalo. These articles would appropriate millions of dollars to fund 30 projects and grants throughout the state.

All the new funding goes to the broadband grant program to bring high-speed internet to every corner of the state, while the other “high priorities” such as job training and water infrastructure projects that the bill funds are being paid for by cutting funding in other areas, Garofalo explained.

The jobs, energy and housing articles in the bill also include some provisions DFLers continue to criticize, including capping how much Xcel Energy pays each year into the Renewable Development Account, cutting funding to job creations programs, not providing enough funding for broadband or affordable housing, and controversial policy provisions such as the “tip penalty.”

Rep. Tim Mahoney (DFL-St. Paul) said there’s a “cornucopia of bad stuff in this bill.”

“Minnesotans expect us to invest in people’s success, not to make it even harder for hardworking Minnesotans to get ahead, and we certainly shouldn’t be penalizing people who work for minimum wage and rely on tips to support their families. We should focus on improving lives through higher incomes and better benefits, including paid family leave, earned sick time, and real wage theft protections. Doing that would go a whole lot further in helping Minnesota families get ahead than what Republicans are doing today,” Mahoney said in a statement.

Here is what is in the bill:


The proposed appropriations in the bill would fund projects that include:

The funding provisions would also reduce funding for the Job Creation Fund by $7 million and the Minnesota Investment Fund/North Star Opportunity and Development Account by $5 million. Mahoney unsuccessfully offered an amendment to restore that funding.

Policy provisions

There are dozens of policy provisions in the jobs and energy portion of the bill. Among them are those that would:

  • create a two-tiered minimum wage, making the minimum wage for tipped employees lower;
  • limit annual contributions Xcel Energy must make to the Renewable Development Account to $20 million annually, rather than having the company’s contributions tied to the number of casks of spent nuclear fuel it is storing in Minnesota. Rep. Cal Bahr (R-East Bethel) says this will save Xcel ratepayers $300 million over the current licensing of the nuclear plants;
  • increase the maximum capacity of a solar energy system eligible to receive incentives through Xcel’s Solar Energy Rewards Program from 20 kilowatts to 40 kilowatts and would allow these projects to be counted towards Xcel’s solar energy standard;
  • require the Public Utilities Commission to relocate its offices to Virginia, Minn.;
  • allow public utilities to include certain employer pension contributions in its rate base;
  • allow modular homes to be placed in manufactured home parks; and
  • increase the minimum balance of the Manufactured Home Relocation Trust Fund to $3 million, up from $1 million.


More than 20 amendments were offered to the job and energy articles of the bill. The six amendments that were adopted include measures that would:  

— House Public Information Services Assistant Editor Jonathan Mohr and staff writers Ricky Campbell, Michael Strasburg and Melissa Turtinen contributed to this story.


Related Articles

Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter