Conferees working to reach agreement on the omnibus transportation finance and policy bill had an amicable start during their first meeting Monday, receiving an overview and a side-by-side comparison of the two bills they will need to reconcile.
But Rep. Frank Hornstein (DFL-Mpls) and Sen. Scott Newman (R-Hutchinson), who sponsor HF1684*/SF1159 and co-chair the conference committee, said negotiations on the bill’s most significant differences will have to wait until legislative leaders agree on a final budget target.
“Once we get it, we’ll start rolling up our sleeves and really putting the bill together,” Hornstein said, adding the target could come sometime in the next week.
Newman agreed and took an optimistic tone.
“I don’t anticipate we will pass a transportation bill other than through this conference committee process,” he said. “I am very hopeful that is going to work and we are successful.”
Newman said the committee plans to meet again Tuesday morning to hear preliminary testimony from agency officials as conferees try to do their background work and put themselves in a position to “move fairly aggressively” when the final budget target arrives.
Overviews
While debate on significant differences is on hold, Monday’s meeting was spent learning about the respective bills. Nonpartisan legislative fiscal and research staff spent most of the three-hour meeting detailing the provisions included in each version.
The bills are somewhat close in their appropriations for the Department of Transportation ($6.73 billion in the House bill; $6.48 billion in Senate) and the Department of Public Safety ($490.49 million in the House; $486.34 in Senate) during the 2022-23 biennium.
House Photography file photoBut there are major differences as well, with the House calling for $178.81 million to fund the Metropolitan Council, while the Senate bill would appropriate $20 million.
The House would also include $400 million in trunk highway bonding for fiscal year 2024, of which $225 million would go to state road construction and $175 million to the Corridors of Commerce program. The Senate has no such provision.
The House bill would result in a $38.6 million increase in General Fund spending over the current base level; the Senate $220 million.
The House language also contains several proposed tax increases that are not part of the Senate bill, including a penny-per-gallon gas tax increase that would come from requiring the Department of Revenue to index the motor fuels tax to inflation using the National Highway Construction Cost Index.
Another House-only provision that’s proven controversial in the past would allow people without proof of legal presence in the U.S. to obtain a driver’s license or Minnesota identification card.
Newman has said the Senate bill is focused on eliminating wasteful spending that doesn’t benefit most Minnesotans and is instead focused on putting that money into roads and bridges.
[MORE: View the detailed spreadsheet, comparison summary]
Some of the House-only provisions include:
Senate-only provisions include:
The committee did adopt several same or similar provisions during Monday’s meeting. Some of those include:
House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman (DFL-Brooklyn Park) and her husband, Mark, were fatally shot in their home early Saturday morning.
Gov. Tim Walz announced the news dur...
About that talk of needing all 21 hours left in a legislative day to complete a special session?
House members were more than up to the challenge Monday. Beginning at 10 a.m...