Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House passes $768 million omnibus health and human services bill

Rep. Jennifer Schultz, chair of the House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee, makes opening remarks as debate on HF4706/SF4410*, the omnibus health and human services bill, begins May 3. (Photo by Paul Battaglia)
Rep. Jennifer Schultz, chair of the House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee, makes opening remarks as debate on HF4706/SF4410*, the omnibus health and human services bill, begins May 3. (Photo by Paul Battaglia)

A House was once again divided along party lines in passing an omnibus bill.

This time it was the omnibus health and human services bill that passed, as amended, 69-64 Tuesday. HF4706/SF4410* now goes back to the Senate, which passed its version 61-5 April 26. A conference committee will likely be needed to construct a compromise bill.

Total supplemental spending in the 2022-23 biennium is $768 million, with $478.7 million for human services and early childhood programs and $270.7 million aimed at health programs.

[MORE: View the spreadsheet]

“This is a bill that puts Minnesota on a path to success by making health care more affordable for Minnesotans,” said Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL-Rochester), chair of the House Health Finance and Policy Committee. She sponsors the bill with Sen. Jim Abeler (R-Anoka).

“It takes real steps to control drug prices, so Minnesotans who get a prescription can actually get the medicine they need to be healthy or sometimes even just to stay alive,” she said.

Liebling said the 876-page bill focuses on ways to support the behavioral health workforce, mental health workers, and community health workers, including grants, scholarships, and technical assistance.

Access to health care would also be increased, Liebling said, especially for seniors, people with a disability, and people in historically medically underserved communities.

Three House bills were merged last week by the House Ways and Means Committee to create the supplemental funding and policy package:

  • Articles 1-4 of the omnibus early childhood bill (HF4735);
  • the omnibus human services bill (HF4579); and
  • the omnibus health bill (HF4706).

[MORE: List of bills included in the omnibus bill]

Rep. Jennifer Schultz (DFL-Duluth), chair of the House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee, said the omnibus bill would make historic investments in human services.”

She said the bill reflects the high priority the committee placed on addressing health care workforces shortages across the state.

“We are investing resources into addressing the health care workforce shortage by increasing wages for personal care assistants, and funding for training to increase our health care workforce pipeline,” she said.

To that end, the omnibus bill would encourage participation in the human services workforce through tools such as tuition forgiveness, incentive pay, workforce development grants and increased reimbursement rates on wages paid to personal care assistants.

Rep. Tony Albright speaks to the omnibus health and human services bill prior to its passage May 3. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)

Republicans said they support some portions of the bill, but portions of it spend state money irresponsibly by funding programs that will severely strain the tax base.

“The growth of spending in this bill outpaces a number of factors,” said Rep. Tony Albright (R-Prior Lake). “It is unsustainable.”

Other areas where the bill fails, according to Republicans, are a lack of compensation for people injured by adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, few efforts to reduce fraud in state-run health care programs, insufficient funding for staffing nursing homes, and setting hospital nursing staff ratios that hinder the flexibility of hospital administrators.

 

Amendments

Only one of the 13 amendments offered was adopted, an amendment offered by Liebling making technical changes and fixing drafting errors.

None of the 12 amendments offered by Republicans was adopted, either by being voted down or being ruled out of order by not being germane to the topic of the bill being amended.

Two amendments ruled out of order were on the topic of abortion: one that would have required medical clinics performing 10 or more abortions per month to obtain a license from the Department of Health; and a second that would have prevented organizations receiving family planning grants “to directly or indirectly subsidize abortion services or related administrative expenses.”

Three other amendments ruled not germane would have:

Amendments voted down included those that would have:


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...
Legislative leaders announce 2024 committee deadlines
(House Photography file photo) Legislators and the public officially know the timeline for getting bills through the House committee process during the upcoming 2024 session. Here are the two deadlines fo...

Minnesota House on Twitter