Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Forget fees — under bill, MN tenants could sidestep landlord entry and additional charges

Tenants may dodge fees. Landlords, on the other hand, could face potential penalties.

Rep. Kaohly Vang Her (DFL-St. Paul) said that Minnesota is a landlord-friendly state with a skewed balance of power.

“This is because Minnesota’s tenant-landlord laws have not received serious revision in decades,” she said.

Of the three bills proposed by Her in Tuesday’s House Housing Finance and Policy Committee, HF315 would prohibit landlords from imposing fees.

The bill would also restrict landlord entry and apply fees to landlords for subsequent violations. It was approved and referred to the House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee.

The bill offers few exceptions while outlining well-defined penalties.

MN House housing committee hears HF315 1/24/23

The types of fees that would be banned include those for move-in, move-out, vague administration practices, lease processing, amenity and access to rental portals.

“HF315 would prohibit those non-optional fees for non-optional services,” said Rachael Sterling, a housing attorney at HOME Line.

“This is different from a pet fee or parking fee a tenant can elect to add to their monthly costs,” she said.

Violators would pay either three times the amount of each unenforceable fee or $500, whichever is greater. In addition, the court could award reasonable attorney fees to tenants.

Landlords entering residential properties could be limited to a four-hour window between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. and be required to give at least 24-hour notice. Instead of a civil penalty of $100, minimum penalties would have to match or exceed one month’s rent and reasonable attorney’s fees.

Siya Sakhardande, a University of Minnesota undergraduate student government representative, testified in support of the bill because of the financial and privacy protections it would provide to student tenants.

“Being taken advantage of our inexperience as renters is something we as students have become accustomed to,” she said.

Jennifer Spadine, a principal at Guardian Property Management, suggested an alternative solution of early fee disclosure. She shares concerns about hidden fees, but believes penalties are excessive in what-she-called an “overly broad” bill.

Rep. Jim Nash (R-Waconia) said the damages seem “like a trial lawyer’s dream,” calling them aggressive and heavy-handed.


Related Articles

Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter