Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House lawmakers consider proposal to remake literacy curriculum across the state

HF629 proposes an ambitious goal — to have all Minnesota students reading at or above grade level by the end of third grade in 2025. (House Photography file photo)
HF629 proposes an ambitious goal — to have all Minnesota students reading at or above grade level by the end of third grade in 2025. (House Photography file photo)

Reading proficiency rates are slipping among Minnesota’s students, with nearly half of all students not now reading at grade level. It’s an issue that has been raised many times in the education committees this session.

On Tuesday, the House Education Policy Committee finally heard a proposal to tackle this intensifying predicament.

“HF629, the READ Act, is an effort to take what we know about research, human development, cognitive science, and how people learn to read, and apply it to meaningful public policy,” said Rep. Heather Edelson (DFL-Edina), the bill sponsor.

“This goal is to support our districts and to improve literacy rates across the state of Minnesota, to help every child have the opportunity to read well.”

House committee hears bill with aim to boost reading proficiency among MN students 2/14/23

The committee intended to send the bill, as amended, to the House Education Finance Committee, but it was ultimately laid over for future discussion.

At the core of the bill is an ambitious goal – have all students reading at or above grade level by the end of grade 3 in 2025. This would be done primarily by remaking the literacy curriculum to conform with evidence-based reading instruction termed the “science of reading.”

To that end, Edelson wants to appropriate substantial sums to local districts and charter schools. This would amount to $40 million in fiscal year 2024 for schools to purchase new books, instructional materials, and intervention materials; and $30 million annually in the upcoming biennium to train classroom teachers on the science of reading method.

Edelson admits the bill is a work in progress: the definition of a “literacy specialist” and language around progress monitoring will continue to be shaped before the next committee stop.

Over a dozen teachers, administrators, students, and community advocates said the state’s current literacy curriculum and teaching methods need a foundational overhaul.

“As we know, our educational systems are failing our students when it comes to reading,” said Maria Roberts, an elementary school principal.

However, there were differences of opinion regarding the bill itself. Some felt the proposal does not go far enough in addressing the persistent achievement gap between Black and white students; feared it would not adequately prepare teachers to be culturally competent for diverse student population; or warned against relying on the science of reading as the sole pedagogical method for teaching kids how to read.

Related Articles

Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter