Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House panel ponders elimination of Diversionary Work Program

Elana Gravitz, a public policy manager for Hennepin County, testifies before the House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee Feb. 21 in support of HF466, which would eliminate the Diversionary Work Program. (Photo by Catherine Davis)
Elana Gravitz, a public policy manager for Hennepin County, testifies before the House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee Feb. 21 in support of HF466, which would eliminate the Diversionary Work Program. (Photo by Catherine Davis)

Most low-income families seeking economic assistance from the state must first take part in a program meant to help them quickly find work. But experts, and now some lawmakers, say that program isn’t achieving its goals and should be eliminated.

Rep. Mohamud Noor (DFL-Mpls) sponsors HF466 that would do just that. The bill, as modified by a delete-all amendment, was laid over for possible omnibus bill inclusion by the House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee Tuesday.

Noor told members that when the Minnesota Family Investment Program – which helps low-income families with children meet their basic needs while helping parents find work to achieve financial stability – was created, the Diversionary Work Program was also put in place as a stop-gap measure.

That is a four-month course meant to help parents find jobs quickly so they can avoid having to use MFIP, which usually has a lifetime eligibility limit of 60 months.

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee considers HF466 2/21/23

“Guess what? After 20 years there is nothing that has changed, meaning that most of the individuals who go through DWP will end up in MFIP one way or another within 12 months,” Noor said. “…We created more burden, we created more work for the staff, we created a system that does not work for anyone.”

The bill would also remove unnecessary barriers and simplify the process for participants and the staff who administer MFIP, he said. Those modifications include removing hardship sanctions, updating how benefits are calculated, and changing the requirement for income verification reports for those in the program from monthly to every six months.

Hennepin County Commissioner Jeffrey Lunde said the latter change would help families focus on finding new work, complete school or training programs, adding that data shows the diversion program doesn’t work.

“Less than 10% of Hennepin County families successfully complete DWP and the vast majority move on to MFIP,” Lunde said.

During a presentation on the programs last week, Department of Human Services officials said most families don’t rely on the benefits for long. Over 40% of new applicants use MFIP once for 12 months or less, and only about 7% of families have reached the 60-month time limit since the program began in 1998.

An average of 28,000 families per month participated in one of the programs in 2022, and 72% of the people receiving that assistance are children.

Committee members were generally receptive to the bill, although Rep. Brian Daniels (R-Faribault) questioned whether it “would incentivize people to be self-sufficient” and said he looked forward to ongoing conversations on the issue.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter