Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House lawmakers open debate on health insurance public option

Peter Brickwedde, assistant commissioner of government and external affairs, and Julia Dreier, deputy commissioner for the Insurance Division, testify before the House Health Finance and Policy Committee Feb. 20. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)
Peter Brickwedde, assistant commissioner of government and external affairs, and Julia Dreier, deputy commissioner for the Insurance Division, testify before the House Health Finance and Policy Committee Feb. 20. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)

A State Office Building hearing room was at capacity Tuesday with lobbyists and members of the public, many of whom wore T-shirts branded with either “Faith in Minnesota” or UNIDOS Mn. One woman wore a League of Minnesota Voters button.

They were all there to receive a report ordered by a 2023 law to examine the feasibility of expanding MinnesotaCare to allow individuals making too much money to otherwise qualify.

No action was taken by the House Health Finance and Policy Committee.

According to a letter accompanying the report, it is assumed that between 107,000 and 151,000 individuals would enroll in a public option. It is further assumed that those individuals at present do not have health insurance or have plans purchased through the public market.

“We obviously have a very real problem in our health care system,” said Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL-Rochester), the committee chair. “We have many people who are not being able to get access to health care or are going … broke because they can’t access health care. We obviously have health providers who are struggling in different parts of the state. The real question before us with this is ‘Does this set the right direction for us?’ … If not this, then what, because I think it is clear doing nothing is really not an option. If you have a health care concern, you need help now.”

Milliman Inc., a nationally known actuarial firm, presented two options, costs of which to the state would be between $86 million and $364 million, not including administration, operation, and implementation costs. Both would essentially be managed care models.

A Department of Commerce study presented to the committee found that a 33-year-old woman living in the Twin Cities metropolitan area would pay a premium of $107.83 a month — following a state subsidy — in 2027 through a public option plan offered through MinnesotaCare or purchased through MNsure.

That plan would provide more benefits than at present, said Peter Brickwedde, assistant commissioner of government and external affairs. A federal subsidy currently in place is expected to expire in 2026.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter