Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Electrical upgrade costs could be shared under bill

Logan O'Grady, executive director of the Minnesota Solar Energy Industries Association, shares a laugh with Rep. Patty Acomb April 3 before testifying before the House Climate and Energy Finance and Policy Committee. Acomb sponsors HF5097. (Photo by Michele Jokinen)
Logan O'Grady, executive director of the Minnesota Solar Energy Industries Association, shares a laugh with Rep. Patty Acomb April 3 before testifying before the House Climate and Energy Finance and Policy Committee. Acomb sponsors HF5097. (Photo by Michele Jokinen)

When she decided to have solar panels installed on her home, Rep. Patty Acomb (DFL-Minnetonka) learned something about the economics of introducing a new mode of generating electricity into her neighborhood.

“Our project triggered the need for a new transformer,” she told the House Climate and Energy Finance and Policy Committee Wednesday. “If we wanted to continue our project, we’d have to pay for the total cost of the improvements, even though the expanded capacity went above our project’s needs. The result [was] the potential project after ours would not be required to pay for any of this capacity.”

To her, it didn’t make sense that the cost of what could become a shared benefit for an area’s residents should be borne by the first homeowner triggering the need for a distribution upgrade. Since then, her electric utility, Xcel Energy, has implemented a cost-sharing pilot project for small rooftop projects in which each homeowner pays into an upgrade fund that covers costs over $15,000.

House Climate and Energy Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/24

That is the genesis of HF5097, an Acomb-sponsored bill that would require the Public Utilities Commission to develop a cost-sharing process for distribution system upgrades and would create an ombudsperson position at the commission to assist interconnection applicants and facilitate interconnection disputes between applicants and utilities.

The committee laid the bill over, as amended, for possible inclusion in a larger climate and energy bill.

“Interconnection is a set of rules that new electricity generation must follow to connect to the grid,” Acomb said. “Currently, in just the Xcel area, there are over 400 project applications that are in the queue and deemed complete waiting to be interconnected. As I understand the reason for the large numbers, it’s mostly due to congestion on the grid or the lack of capacity for new generation and the costs with the associated upgrades.”

“I appreciate the idea of it,” said Rep. Chris Swedzinski (R-Ghent). “I’m just not sure about starting a program that potentially could affect utilities and ratepayers in a negative way, to allow ratepayers to subsidize the costs of interconnection for developers from potentially out of state or in state. And I’m concerned about empowering unelected folks at the PUC to come up with a program that we’re not exactly sure what it’s going to look like.”

The nonpartisan Legislative Budget Office estimates that the bill’s changes would require $266,000 from a restricted miscellaneous special revenue fund in fiscal year 2025 and $497,000 in the 2026-27 biennium.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter