Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7325

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

 

EIGHTY-THIRD SESSION - 2004

 

_____________________

 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH DAY

 

Saint Paul, Minnesota, Tuesday, May 11, 2004

 

 

The House of Representatives convened at 12:00 noon and was called to order by Ron Abrams, Speaker pro tempore.

 

Prayer was offered by Pastor John Tenjack, Grace Alliance Church, Forest Lake, Minnesota.

 

The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

 

The roll was called and the following members were present:

 


Abrams

Adolphson

Anderson, B.

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Atkins

Beard

Bernardy

Biernat

Blaine

Borrell

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Buesgens

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Cox

Davids

Davnie

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorman

Dorn

Eastlund

Eken

Ellison

Entenza

Erhardt

Erickson

Finstad

Fuller

Gerlach

Goodwin

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Hausman

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Howes

Huntley

Jacobson

Jaros

Johnson, J.

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Klinzing

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Krinkie

Kuisle

Lanning

Larson

Latz

Lenczewski

Lesch

Lieder

Lindgren

Lindner

Lipman

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

McNamara

Mullery

Murphy

Nelson, C.

Nelson, M.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Olson, M.

Opatz

Osterman

Otremba

Otto

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Penas

Peterson

Powell

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Sieben

Simpson

Smith

Soderstrom

Solberg

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Thao

Thissen

Urdahl

Vandeveer

Wagenius

Walker

Walz

Wardlow

Wasiluk

Westerberg

Westrom

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum


 

A quorum was present.

 

Tingelstad was excused.

 

Abeler was excused until 1:10 p.m. Slawik was excused until 1:15 p.m. Meslow was excused until 1:55 p.m.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7326

The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day. Jacobson moved that further reading of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.

 

 

REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK

 

S. F. No. 676 and H. F. No. 1086, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.

 

SUSPENSION OF RULES

 

Smith moved that the rules be so far suspended that S. F. No. 676 be substituted for H. F. No. 1086 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.

 

 

SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS

 

 

S. F. No. 676 was read for the second time.

 

 

INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

 

The following House Files were introduced:

 

 

Kahn, Ozment, Huntley and Murphy introduced:

 

H. F. No. 3197, A resolution requesting the governor to include the Great Lakes and Lake Superior in providing comments on a certain federal report.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.

 

 

Mariani, Greiling and Ellison introduced:

 

H. F. No. 3198, A bill for an act relating to education; directing the education commissioner to seek a waiver from ineffective provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind Act; directing the education commissioner to report on policies and programs to supplement the positive effects of the act related to improving student achievement, closing the student achievement gap, and establishing school accountability; appropriating money for supplemental educational services.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Education Policy.

 

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

 

The following messages were received from the Senate:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7327

Mr. Speaker:

 

I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:

 

H. F. No. 2187, A bill for an act relating to commerce; requiring debt collection agency employees to be registered instead of licensed; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 332.33; 332.335, subdivision 1; 332.35; 332.37; 332.395; 332.40; 332.41; 332.42; 332.43, subdivision 1.

 

Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE

 

Stang moved that the House concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2187 and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Senate. The motion prevailed.

 

 

H. F. No. 2187, A bill for an act relating to commerce; requiring debt collection agency employees to be registered instead of licensed; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 332.33; 332.335, subdivision 1; 332.35; 332.37; 332.395; 332.40; 332.41; 332.42; 332.43, subdivision 1.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.

 

The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 129 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abrams

Adolphson

Anderson, B.

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Atkins

Beard

Bernardy

Biernat

Blaine

Borrell

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Buesgens

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Cox

Davids

Davnie

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorman

Dorn

Eastlund

Eken

Ellison

Erhardt

Erickson

Finstad

Fuller

Gerlach

Goodwin

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Hausman

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Howes

Huntley

Jacobson

Jaros

Johnson, J.

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Klinzing

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Krinkie

Kuisle

Lanning

Larson

Latz

Lenczewski

Lesch

Lieder

Lindgren

Lindner

Lipman

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

McNamara

Mullery

Murphy

Nelson, C.

Nelson, M.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Olson, M.

Opatz

Osterman

Otremba

Otto

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Penas

Peterson

Powell

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Sieben

Simpson

Smith

Soderstrom

Solberg

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Thao

Thissen

Urdahl

Vandeveer

Wagenius

Walker

Walz

Wardlow

Wasiluk

Westerberg

Westrom

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum


 

 

The bill was repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title agreed to.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7328

Mr. Speaker:

 

I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following Senate File, herewith transmitted:

 

S. F. No. 2696.

 

Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS

 

 

S. F. No. 2696, A bill for an act relating to liquor; providing for conformity in license fees and production levels for brewpubs and small brewers; authorizing issuance of temporary licenses to small brewers; authorizing off-sale of growlers by small brewers; clarifying restrictions on location of retail licenses in proximity to certain institutions; providing for uniform off-sale hours statewide; regulating Sunday on-sales; modifying sampling provisions; providing that the on-sale license for Elko Speedway authorizes sales on all days of the week; changing the issuer of a certain license at the state fair; authorizing the city of Duluth to issue a liquor license for Wade Municipal Stadium; authorizing the city of St. Paul to issue a liquor license for special events at the State Capitol; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 340A.404, subdivision 10; 340A.412, subdivision 4; 340A.504, subdivision 4; 340A.702; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, sections 340A.301, subdivisions 6, 7; 340A.504, subdivisions 1, 3; 340A.510, subdivision 2; Laws 2003, chapter 126, section 28; Laws 2003, chapter 126, section 29; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A.

 

The bill was read for the first time.

 

Westerberg moved that S. F. No. 2696 and H. F. No. 2816, now on the Calendar for the Day, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.

 

 

CALENDAR FOR THE DAY

 

 

S. F. No. 1530 was reported to the House.

 

 

Strachan moved to amend S. F. No. 1530 as follows:

 

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 1593, the second engrossment:

 

"Section 1. [346.155] [OWNING DANGEROUS ANIMALS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DEFINITIONS.] (a) The definitions in this subdivision apply to this section.

 

(b) "Person" means a natural person, firm, partnership, corporation, or association, however organized.

 

(c) "Wildlife sanctuary" means a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that:

 

(1) operates a place of refuge where abused, neglected, unwanted, impounded, abandoned, orphaned, or displaced wildlife are provided care for their lifetime;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7329

(2) does not conduct any commercial activity with respect to any animal of which the organization is an owner; and

 

(3) does not buy, sell, trade, auction, lease, loan, or breed any animal of which the organization is an owner, except as an integral part of the species survival plan of the American Zoo and Aquarium Association.

 

(d) "Possess" means to own, care for, have custody of, or control.

 

(e) "Regulated animal" means:

 

(1) all members of the Felidae family including, but not limited to, lions, tigers, cougars, leopards, cheetahs, ocelots, and servals, but not including domestic cats or cats recognized as a domestic breed, registered as a domestic breed, and shown as a domestic breed by a national or international multibreed cat registry association;

 

(2) bears; and

 

(3) all nonhuman primates, including, but not limited to, lemurs, monkeys, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, marmosets, lorises, and tamarins.

 

"Regulated animal" includes any hybrid or cross between an animal listed in clause (1), (2), or (3) and a domestic animal and offspring from all subsequent generations of those crosses or hybrids.

 

(f) "Local animal control authority" means an agency of the state, county, municipality, or other governmental subdivision of the state that is responsible for animal control operations in its jurisdiction.

 

Subd. 2. [POSSESSION OF REGULATED ANIMALS.] (a) Except as provided in this section, it is unlawful for a person to possess a regulated animal.

 

(b) A person who possesses a regulated animal on the effective date of this section has 120 days to come into compliance with regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Agriculture for regulated animals under the Animal Welfare Act, Public Law 89-544, and its subsequent amendments, and the regulations adopted under that act relating to facilities and operations, animal health and husbandry, and veterinary care for regulated animals.

 

(c) Except as provided in paragraph (e), a person must not take possession of a regulated animal after the effective date of this section.

 

(d) Except as provided in paragraph (e), only a person who possesses a valid United States Department of Agriculture license is allowed to breed regulated animals after the effective date of this section.

 

(e) Except as provided in paragraph (g), a person who possesses a valid United States Department of Agriculture license or is registered with a local animal control authority under this section and is in compliance with the United States Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act regulations and standards on the effective date of this section may breed, purchase, or otherwise acquire new regulated animals after the effective date of this section in order to maintain their inventory, or to sell regulated animals to other United States Department of Agriculture licensed and compliant facilities, to persons registered under this section, or to exempt facilities under subdivision 7. For purposes of this paragraph, "maintain their inventory" includes adding additional regulated animals as necessary to maintain their operation up to 125 percent of the number of regulated animals at the time of registration.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7330

(f) Except as provided in paragraph (g), a person who does not hold a United States Department of Agriculture license for regulated animals and is in compliance with this section may replace a tiger or lion possessed by the person on the effective date of this section if the animal dies, but may replace it only once.

 

(g) If a regulated animal dies of neglect or cruelty, is seized pursuant to subdivision 5, or if the person is involved in illegal activities, the person cannot acquire a replacement animal.

 

Subd. 3. [REGISTRATION.] (a) Within 60 days after the effective date of this section, a person who possesses a regulated animal must notify in writing the local animal control authority using a registration form approved by the Board of Animal Health. The notification must include the person's name, address, telephone number, and a complete inventory of each regulated animal that the person possesses. The inventory shall include the following information: number and species of each regulated animal; the microchip number and manufacturer for each regulated animal if available; the exact location where each regulated animal is kept; and age, sex, color, weight, scars, and any distinguishing marks of each regulated animal.

 

(b) If a person who possesses a regulated animal has a microchip implanted in the animal for identification, the name of the microchip manufacturer and the identification number of the microchip must be provided to the local animal control authority.

 

(c) If a local animal control authority performs an initial site inspection, a fee of up to $50 may be charged. An annual fee of $25 per animal to register regulated animals up to a maximum of $100 annually per person may be charged. The local animal control authority may charge an additional site inspection fee of $50 if the person acquires and possesses another type of regulated animal. A certificate of registration must be issued by the local animal control authority to the person upon payment of the fee.

 

Subd. 4. [REQUIREMENTS.] (a) A person who possesses a regulated animal must maintain health and ownership records on each animal and must maintain the records for five years.

 

(b) A person who possesses a regulated animal must maintain an ongoing program of veterinary care which includes a veterinary visit to the premises at least annually.

 

(c) A person who possesses a regulated animal must notify the local animal control authority in writing within ten days of a change in address or location where the regulated animal is kept.

 

(d) A person who possesses a regulated animal must prominently display a sign on the enclosure where the animal is housed indicating the presence of a regulated animal.

 

(e) A person who possesses a regulated animal must notify, as soon as practicable, local law enforcement officials of any escape of a regulated animal. The person who possesses the regulated animal is liable for any costs incurred by any person, city, county, or state agency resulting from the escape of a regulated animal unless the escape is due to a criminal act or a natural event.

 

(f) A person who possesses a regulated animal must maintain a written recovery plan in the event of the escape of a regulated animal. The person must maintain a tranquilizer gun, tranquilizers, live traps, or other equipment necessary to assist in the recovery of the regulated animal.

 

(g) If a person who possesses a regulated animal can no longer care for the animal, the person shall take steps to find long-term placement for the regulated animal.

 

Subd. 5. [SEIZURE.] (a) If the local animal control authority determines that a person who possesses one or more regulated animals is not in compliance with the requirements of this section, the local animal control authority shall provide written notice and warning to the person and commence appropriate actions to seize the animal or animals.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7331

(b) A person notified by the local animal control authority under paragraph (a) may submit to the local animal control authority a written request for a temporary permit to retain custody of the animal or animals for up to 30 days, during which time the person shall take all necessary actions to come into compliance. During the 30-day period, the local animal control authority may inspect, at any reasonable time, the premises where a regulated animal is kept.

 

(c) If a person who possesses one or more regulated animals is not in compliance with this section following the 30-day period allowed in paragraph (b), the local animal control authority may seize the animal or animals on the premises. The local animal control authority must provide a notice of the seizure by delivering and mailing it to the owner, by posting a copy of it at the place where the animal is taken into custody, or by delivering it to a person residing on the property and informing the owner by telephone, if possible. The notice must include:

 

(1) a description of the animal or animals seized;

 

(2) the authority and purpose for the seizure;

 

(3) the time, place, and circumstances under which the animal or animals were seized; and

 

(4) a contact person and telephone number.

 

(d) The notice provided to the person from whom a regulated animal was seized must include statements that:

 

(1) the person may post a security deposit with the local animal control authority to prevent disposition or destruction of the animal or animals;

 

(2) the person may fill out a form provided with the notice to request a hearing concerning the seizure;

 

(3) failure to post a security deposit within five business days following the date of the seizure may result in disposal or other disposition of the animal; and

 

(4) the actual costs of care, keeping, and disposal or destruction of the regulated animal will be the responsibility of the person from whom the animal was seized, except to the extent that a court finds that the seizure or impoundment was not substantially justified under law.

 

(e) If a person from whom a regulated animal was seized makes a written request within five days of the seizure, a hearing to determine the validity of the seizure must be held within an additional five business days. The judge may order the return of the animal to the person from whom the animal was seized if the judge finds:

 

(1) the person can and will provide the care required by law for the regulated animal; and

 

(2) the regulated animal is physically fit.

 

(f) If the judge orders a permanent disposition of the regulated animal, the local animal control authority may place the animal with a wildlife sanctuary, persons authorized by the Department of Natural Resources, or an appropriate United States Department of Agriculture licensed facility. If no such facility is available for disposition of the animal, the local animal control authority may order that the animal be destroyed.

 

(g) A person from whom a regulated animal is seized is liable for all the actual costs of care, keeping, and disposal or destruction of the animal, except to the extent that a judge finds that the seizure was not substantially justified by law. The costs shall be paid in full or a mutually satisfactory arrangement for payment must be made between the local animal control authority and the person claiming an interest in the animal before return of the animal to the person.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7332

(h) A person from whom a regulated animal has been seized under this subdivision may prevent disposition of the animal by posting security in the amount sufficient to provide for the actual costs of care and keeping of the animal. The security must be posted within five business days of the seizure, inclusive of the day of the seizure.

 

(i) If circumstances exist that threaten the life of a person or the life of another animal, local law enforcement or the local animal control authority may seize a regulated animal without providing prior notice, notice at the time of seizure, or the opportunity for a hearing or court order or destroy the animal.

 

Subd. 6. [DISPOSAL OF ANIMALS.] Upon proper determination by a Minnesota licensed veterinarian, any regulated animal taken into custody under this section may be immediately disposed of when the regulated animal is suffering and is beyond cure through reasonable care and treatment. The authority taking custody of the regulated animal may recover all costs incurred under this section.

 

Subd. 7. [EXEMPTIONS.] This section does not apply to:

 

(1) institutions accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association;

 

(2) a wildlife sanctuary;

 

(3) fur-bearing animals, as defined in section 97A.015, possessed by a game farm that is licensed under section 97A.105, or bears possessed by a game farm that is licensed under section 97A.105;

 

(4) the Department of Natural Resources, or a person authorized by permit issued by the commissioner of natural resources pursuant to section 97A.401, subdivision 3;

 

(5) a Minnesota licensed or accredited research or medical institution; or

 

(6) a circus, carnival, rodeo, or county fair.

 

Subd. 8. [REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ANIMAL HEALTH.] By July 1 each year, local animal control authorities shall report to the Board of Animal Health on regulated animals registered with the local animal control authorities. The report shall include all registration information submitted to the local animal control authority under subdivision 3, paragraph (a), and information on enforcement actions taken under this section.

 

Subd. 9. [PENALTY.] A person who knowingly violates subdivision 2, 3, or 4 is guilty of a misdemeanor."

 

Delete the title and insert:

 

"A bill for an act relating to animals; regulating certain bears, primates, and members of the Felidae family; imposing a penalty; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 346."

 

 

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

S. F. No. 1530, as amended, was read for the third time.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7333

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

Blaine moved that the action whereby S. F. No. 1530, as amended, was given its third reading be now reconsidered. The motion prevailed.

 

 

The Speaker assumed the Chair.

 

 

Blaine moved to amend S. F. No. 1530, as amended, as follows:

 

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

 

"Section 1. [35.805] [OWNING CERTAIN REGULATED ANIMALS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DEFINITIONS.] (a) The definitions in this subdivision apply to this section.

 

(b) "Person" means a natural person, firm, partnership, corporation, or association however organized.

 

(c) "Possess" means to own, care for, have custody of, or control.

 

(d) "Regulated animal" means:

 

(1) all members of the Felidae family including, but not limited to, lions, tigers, cougars, leopards, cheetahs, ocelots, and servals, but not including domestic cats or cats recognized as a domestic breed, registered as a domestic breed, and shown as a domestic breed by a national or international multibreed cat registry association;

 

(2) bears; and

 

(3) all nonhuman primates, including, but not limited to, lemurs, monkeys, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, marmosets, lorises, and tamarins.

 

Regulated animal includes any hybrid or cross between an animal listed in clause (1), (2), or (3) and a domestic animal and offspring from all subsequent generations of those crosses or hybrids.

 

Subd. 2. [POSSESSION OF REGULATED ANIMALS.] (a) Except as provided in this section, it is unlawful for a person to possess a regulated animal.

 

(b) A person who possesses a regulated animal on the effective date of this section has 120 days to come into compliance with regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Agriculture for regulated animals under the Animal Welfare Act, Public Law 89-544, and its subsequent amendments, and the regulations adopted under that act relating to facilities and operations, animal health and husbandry, and veterinary care for regulated animals.

 

(c) Only a person who possesses a valid United States Department of Agriculture or Minnesota state license is allowed to breed regulated animals after the effective date of this section.

 

(d) A person who possesses a valid United States Department of Agriculture license or Minnesota state license and is in compliance with the United States Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act regulations and standards may breed, purchase, or otherwise acquire new regulated animals after the effective date of this section, or sell regulated animals to other United States Department of Agriculture licensed and compliant facilities, to persons registered under this section, or to exempt facilities under subdivision 7.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7334

(e) If a regulated animal dies of neglect or cruelty, is seized pursuant to subdivision 5, or if the person is involved in illegal activities, the person cannot acquire a replacement animal.

 

(f) It is unlawful for a person in control of real property to knowingly permit another person to possess a regulated animal on that property, except in compliance with this section.

 

Subd. 3. [REGISTRATION.] (a) Within 60 days after the effective date of this section, a person who possesses a regulated animal must notify the board in writing using a registration form prepared by the board. The notification shall include the person's name, address, telephone number, and a complete inventory of each regulated animal that the person possesses. The inventory shall include the following information: number and species of each regulated animal; the exact location where each regulated animal is kept; and age, sex, color, weight, scars, and any distinguishing marks of each regulated animal.

 

(b) The board may charge an initial site inspection fee of $50 plus an annual fee of $25 per animal to register regulated animals up to a maximum of $100 annually per person. The board may charge an additional site inspection fee of $50 if the person acquires and possesses another type of regulated animal.

 

Subd. 4. [REQUIREMENTS.] (a) A person who possesses a regulated animal must maintain health and ownership records on each animal and must maintain the records for five years.

 

(b) A person who possesses a regulated animal must maintain an ongoing program of veterinary care which includes a veterinary visit to the premises at least annually.

 

(c) A person who possesses a regulated animal must notify the Board of Animal Health in writing within ten days of a change in address or location where the regulated animal is kept.

 

(d) A person who possesses a regulated animal must notify, as soon as practicable, local law enforcement officials of any escape of a regulated animal. The person who possesses the regulated animal is liable for any costs incurred by any person, city, county, or state agency resulting from the escape of a regulated animal unless the escape is due to a criminal act or a natural event.

 

(e) A person who possesses a regulated animal shall maintain a written recovery plan in the event of the escape of a regulated animal. The person shall maintain a tranquilizer gun, tranquilizers, live traps, or other equipment necessary to assist in the recovery of the regulated animal.

 

(f) If a person who possesses a regulated animal can no longer care for the animal, the person shall take steps to find long-term placement for the regulated animal.

 

Subd. 5. [SEIZURE.] (a) If the board determines that a person who possesses one or more regulated animals is not in compliance with the requirements of this section, the board shall provide written notice and warning to the person and commence appropriate actions to seize the animal or animals.

 

(b) A person notified by the board under paragraph (a) may submit to the board a written request for a temporary permit to retain custody of the animal or animals for up to 30 days, during which time the person shall take all necessary actions to come into compliance. During the 30-day period, the board may inspect, at any reasonable time, the premises where a regulated animal is kept.

 

(c) If a person who possesses one or more regulated animals is not in compliance with this section following the 30-day period allowed in paragraph (b), the board may seize the animal or animals on the premises. At the time of the seizure, the board must attempt to notify the owner of the regulated animal by telephone. The board must provide written notice of the seizure by United States mail, postmarked not later than the next business day following the seizure, to the address of the property. The written notice must include:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7335

(1) a description of the animal or animals seized;

 

(2) the authority and purpose for the seizure;

 

(3) the time, place, and circumstances under which the animal or animals were seized; and

 

(4) the location, address, telephone number, and other contact information where the animal is to be kept after the seizure.

 

(d) The notice provided to the person from whom a regulated animal was seized must include statements that:

 

(1) the person may post a security deposit with the board to prevent disposition or destruction of the animal or animals;

 

(2) the person may fill out a form provided with the notice to request a hearing concerning the seizure;

 

(3) failure to post a security deposit within five business days following the date of the seizure may result in disposal or other disposition of the animal; and

 

(4) the actual costs of care, keeping, and disposal or destruction of the regulated animal will be the responsibility of the person from whom the animal was seized, except to the extent that a court finds that the seizure or impoundment was not substantially justified under law.

 

(e) If a person from whom a regulated animal was seized makes a written request within five days of the seizure, a hearing to determine the validity of the seizure must be held within an additional five business days. The judge may order the return of the animal to the person from whom the animal was seized if the judge finds:

 

(1) the person can and will provide the care required by law for the regulated animal; and

 

(2) the regulated animal is physically fit.

 

(f) If the judge orders a permanent disposition of the regulated animal, the board may place the animal with a wildlife sanctuary, a Minnesota licensed wildlife rehabilitator, or another appropriate United States Department of Agriculture licensed facility. If no such facility is available for disposition of the animal, the board may order that the animal be destroyed.

 

(g) A person from whom a regulated animal is seized is liable for all the actual costs of care, keeping, and disposal or destruction of the animal, except to the extent that a judge finds that the seizure was not substantially justified by law. The costs shall be paid in full or a mutually satisfactory arrangement for payment must be made between the board and the person claiming an interest in the animal before return of the animal to the person.

 

(h) A person from whom a regulated animal has been seized under this subdivision may prevent disposition of the animal by posting security in the amount sufficient to provide for the actual costs of care and keeping of the animal. The security must be posted within five business days of the seizure, inclusive of the day of the seizure.

 

(i) If circumstances exist that threaten the life of a person or the life of another animal, the board, local law enforcement, or a local animal control authority may seize a regulated animal without providing prior notice, notice at the time of seizure, or the opportunity for a hearing or court order.

 

Subd. 6. [DISPOSAL OF ANIMALS.] Upon proper determination by a Minnesota licensed veterinarian, any regulated animal taken into custody under this section may be immediately disposed of when the regulated animal is suffering and is beyond cure through reasonable care and treatment. The authority taking custody of the regulated animal may recover all costs incurred under this section.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7336

Subd. 7. [EXEMPTIONS.] This section does not apply to:

 

(1) fur-bearing animals, as defined in section 97A.015, possessed by a game farm that is licensed under section 97A.105 or bears possessed by a game farm that is licensed under section 97A.105;

 

(2) the Department of Natural Resources, or a person authorized by permit issued by the commissioner of natural resources pursuant to section 97A.401, subdivision 3;

 

(3) a Minnesota licensed or accredited research or medical institution; or

 

(4) a circus, carnival, rodeo, or county fair.

 

Subd. 8. [PENALTY.] The board may bring civil or criminal charges as provided in sections 35.92 to 35.96 against a person who knowingly violates provisions of this section."

 

Delete the title and insert:

 

"A bill for an act relating to animals; imposing limits on ownership and possession of certain animals; requiring registration; providing criminal penalties; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 35."

 

 

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

S. F. No. 1530, A bill for an act relating to animals; imposing limits on ownership and possession of certain dangerous animals; requiring registration; providing criminal penalties; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 346.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 107 yeas and 24 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Abrams

Adolphson

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Atkins

Beard

Bernardy

Biernat

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Cox

Davnie

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorman

Dorn

Eastlund

Eken

Ellison

Entenza

Erhardt

Finstad

Goodwin

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Hausman

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Huntley

Jacobson

Jaros

Johnson, J.

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Larson

Latz

Lenczewski

Lesch

Lieder

Lipman

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

McNamara

Mullery

Murphy

Nelson, C.

Nelson, M.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Opatz

Osterman

Otremba

Otto

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peterson

Powell

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Sertich

Severson

Sieben

Slawik

Smith

Solberg

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Thao

Thissen

Wagenius

Walker

Walz

Wardlow

Wasiluk

Westerberg

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum



Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7337

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Blaine

Borrell

Buesgens

Davids

DeLaForest

Erickson

Fuller

Gerlach

Heidgerken

Howes

Klinzing

Krinkie

Lindgren

Lindner

Marquart

Olson, M.

Penas

Seifert

Simpson

Soderstrom

Urdahl

Vandeveer

Westrom


 

 

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

S. F. No. 2703, A bill for an act relating to state employment; modifying state hiring process provisions; adding, modifying, and eliminating definitions; making technical changes; requiring a study and report on the impacts of the political subdivision compensation limit; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 43A.02, subdivisions 4, 6, 11, 26, 32, 34, by adding subdivisions; 43A.04, subdivisions 3, 4; 43A.05, subdivision 1; 43A.10; 43A.11, subdivisions 5, 7, 8, 9; 43A.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15; 43A.16, subdivision 1; 43A.191, subdivision 3; 43A.36, subdivision 1; 43A.39, subdivision 1; 197.455; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 43A.15, subdivision 14; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 43A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 43A.02, subdivisions 7, 8, 15, 16, 19, 20, 37; 43A.11, subdivisions 3, 4; 43A.12; 43A.13, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8; 43A.15, subdivisions 8, 9, 11; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 43A.13, subdivision 7; Minnesota Rules, parts 3900.3300; 3900.6100; 3900.6300; 3900.6400; 3900.6500; 3900.6600; 3900.7100; 3900.7200; 3900.7300; 3900.7400; 3900.8500; 3900.8600; 3900.8800.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

 

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 129 yeas and 3 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Abrams

Adolphson

Anderson, B.

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Atkins

Beard

Bernardy

Biernat

Blaine

Borrell

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Cox

Davids

Davnie

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorman

Dorn

Eastlund

Eken

Ellison

Entenza

Erhardt

Erickson

Finstad

Fuller

Gerlach

Goodwin

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Hausman

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Howes

Huntley

Jacobson

Jaros

Johnson, J.

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Klinzing

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Kuisle

Lanning

Larson

Latz

Lenczewski

Lesch

Lieder

Lindgren

Lipman

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

McNamara

Mullery

Murphy

Nelson, C.

Nelson, M.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Olson, M.

Opatz

Osterman

Otremba

Otto

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Penas

Peterson

Powell

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Sieben

Simpson

Slawik

Smith

Soderstrom

Solberg

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Thao

Thissen

Urdahl

Vandeveer

Wagenius

Walker

Walz

Wardlow

Wasiluk

Westerberg

Westrom

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum



Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7338

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Buesgens

Krinkie

Lindner


 

 

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

 

 

H. F. No. 2609 was reported to the House.

 

 

Thissen moved to amend H. F. No. 2609 as follows:

 

Page 2, line 14, after "of" insert "current employees who are"

 

Page 2, line 15, strike "in the recruiting area population"

 

Page 2, after line 15, insert:

 

"(c) The commissioner may use any of the following factors in addition to the factors required under paragraph (b):"

 

Page 2, line 16, reinstate the stricken language and strike "(3)" and insert "(1)"

 

Page 2, lines 17 and 19, reinstate the stricken language

 

Page 2, line 18, reinstate the stricken language and strike "(4)" and insert "(2)"

 

Page 2, line 20, reinstate the stricken language and strike "(5)" and insert "(3)"

 

Page 2, line 21, strike "(c)" and insert "(d)"

 

 

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

H. F. No. 2609, A bill for an act relating to state employment; modifying affirmative action provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 43A.02, by adding a subdivision; 43A.19, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Rules, part 3900.0400, subpart 11.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 119 yeas and 13 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Abrams

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Atkins

Beard

Bernardy

Biernat

Blaine

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Cox

Davids

Davnie

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorman

Dorn


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7339

Eastlund

Eken

Ellison

Entenza

Erhardt

Finstad

Fuller

Gerlach

Goodwin

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Hausman

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Howes

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson, J.

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Klinzing

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Kuisle

Lanning

Larson

Latz

Lenczewski

Lesch

Lieder

Lindgren

Lipman

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

McNamara

Mullery

Murphy

Nelson, C.

Nelson, M.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Opatz

Osterman

Otremba

Otto

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Penas

Peterson

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Sieben

Simpson

Slawik

Smith

Soderstrom

Solberg

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Thao

Thissen

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Wardlow

Wasiluk

Westrom

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Adolphson

Anderson, B.

Borrell

Buesgens

Erickson

Jacobson

Krinkie

Lindner

Olson, M.

Powell

Vandeveer

Walz

Westerberg


 

 

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

S. F. No. 1639 was reported to the House.

 

 

Pugh moved that S. F. No. 1639 be temporarily laid over on the Calendar for the Day. The motion prevailed.

 

 

The Speaker called Seifert to the Chair.

 

 

H. F. No. 352 was reported to the House.

 

 

Wilkin moved to amend H. F. No. 352, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 16, reinstate the stricken language

 

Page 1, line 17, reinstate the stricken "subdivision 1"

 

Page 2, line 26, delete "or 144.342" and insert "to 144.343, subdivision 1"

 

 

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

The Speaker resumed the Chair.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7340

Wilkin moved to amend H. F. No. 352, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 2, line 26, delete "or" and insert a comma and after "144.342," insert "or 144.348,"

 

Page 3, after line 18, insert:

 

"Sec. 4. [144.348] [PARENT'S AGREEMENT WITH PROVIDER.]

 

(a) A parent or legal guardian of a minor child may enter into an agreement with a health care provider to permit the minor to consent for future health care services under 144.343. The agreement may specify the services for which a minor child may consent, and the duration for which the agreement is effective. The agreement must be notarized by a notary public and must be signed by both the parent or guardian, and the agent of the health care provider.

 

(b) For purposes of this section, a "health care provider" means a person, health care facility, organization, or corporation licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized or permitted by the laws of this state to administer health care directly or through an arrangement with other health care providers, including health maintenance organizations licensed under chapter 62D.

 

Sec. 5. [144.349] [MINORS IN OUT-OF-HOME PLACEMENT.]

 

(a) The executive director, program manager, or a designee thereof, of a licensed residential facility providing outreach, community support, and short-term shelter for unaccompanied homeless, runaway, or abandoned youth may give effective consent for medical, mental, and other health services, except for family planning services, for a minor child while the minor child is receiving services from the licensed residential facility, and the consent of no other person is required. If a minor receives medical, mental, or other health services under this section, the minor's parents must have access to the minor's health records.

 

(b) For purposes of this section, a "residential facility" means any facility or program licensed by the commissioner of human services under chapter 245A or the commissioner of corrections under section 241.021 to serve children in out-of-home placement, that have specific contracts with their host county to provide services to youth identified under paragraph (a).

 

Sec. 6. [144.3491] [ORGANIZATIONS RECEIVING TITLE X FUNDS.]

 

Nothing in sections 144.343, subdivision 1, 144.348, or 144.349 requires an organization that receives federal funds under title X of the Public Health Service Act to refrain from performing any service that is required to be provided as a condition of receiving title X funds, as specified by the provisions of title X or the title X program guidelines for project grants for family planning services published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services."

 

Page 3, line 20, delete "This act" and insert "Sections 121A.22, subdivision 2, 144.335, subdivision 1, 144.343, subdivision 1, 144.348, and 144.349"

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

The Speaker called Olson, M., to the Chair.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7341

Paymar moved to amend the Wilkin amendment to H. F. No. 352, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, delete lines 3 and 4 and insert "delete sections 1 to 3"

 

Page 1, line 8, delete "permit the"

 

Page 1, line 9, delete "minor" and insert "limit the authority of the minor" and delete "future" and before the period, insert "and can have full access to the minor child's health records"

 

Page 1, line 14, after the period, insert "The agreement applies to all health care services provided after the agreement takes effect."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 45 yeas and 88 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abrams

Atkins

Bernardy

Biernat

Carlson

Clark

Davnie

Dorman

Ellison

Entenza

Erhardt

Goodwin

Hausman

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Larson

Latz

Lesch

Mahoney

Mariani

McNamara

Mullery

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Otto

Paymar

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Sertich

Sieben

Slawik

Solberg

Thao

Thissen

Wagenius

Walker

Wasiluk


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Adolphson

Anderson, B.

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Beard

Blaine

Borrell

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Cox

Davids

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorn

Eastlund

Eken

Erickson

Finstad

Fuller

Gerlach

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Heidgerken

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Jacobson

Johnson, J.

Klinzing

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Krinkie

Kuisle

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lieder

Lindgren

Lindner

Lipman

Magnus

Marquart

Meslow

Nelson, C.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Olson, M.

Opatz

Osterman

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Pelowski

Penas

Peterson

Powell

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Seifert

Severson

Simpson

Smith

Soderstrom

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Urdahl

Vandeveer

Walz

Wardlow

Westerberg

Westrom

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum


 

 

The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7342

The question recurred on the Wilkin amendment to H. F. No. 352, the first engrossment, as amended. The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

The Speaker resumed the Chair.

 

 

H. F. No. 352, A bill for an act relating to health; modifying consent requirements for medical treatment of minors; permitting parental access to minor's medical records; providing for minor consent agreements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 121A.22, subdivision 2; 144.335, subdivision 1; 144.343, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 144.3441.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 86 yeas and 47 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Adolphson

Anderson, B.

Anderson, I.

Anderson, J.

Beard

Blaine

Borrell

Boudreau

Bradley

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dempsey

Dill

Dorn

Eastlund

Eken

Erickson

Finstad

Fuller

Gerlach

Greiling

Gunther

Haas

Hackbarth

Harder

Heidgerken

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Jacobson

Johnson, J.

Klinzing

Knoblach

Koenen

Kohls

Krinkie

Kuisle

Lanning

Lieder

Lindgren

Lindner

Lipman

Magnus

Marquart

Meslow

Murphy

Nelson, C.

Nelson, P.

Newman

Nornes

Olsen, S.

Olson, M.

Osterman

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Pelowski

Penas

Peterson

Powell

Ruth

Samuelson

Seagren

Seifert

Severson

Simpson

Smith

Soderstrom

Stang

Strachan

Swenson

Sykora

Urdahl

Vandeveer

Walz

Wardlow

Westerberg

Westrom

Wilkin

Zellers

Spk. Sviggum


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abrams

Atkins

Bernardy

Biernat

Carlson

Clark

Cox

Davnie

Dorman

Ellison

Entenza

Erhardt

Goodwin

Hausman

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson, S.

Juhnke

Kahn

Kelliher

Larson

Latz

Lenczewski

Lesch

Mahoney

Mariani

McNamara

Mullery

Nelson, M.

Opatz

Otto

Paymar

Pugh

Rhodes

Rukavina

Sertich

Sieben

Slawik

Solberg

Thao

Thissen

Wagenius

Walker

Wasiluk


 

 

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

S. F. No. 1758 was reported to the House.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7343

Meslow moved to amend S. F. No. 1758 as follows:

 

Page 4, after line 30, insert:

 

"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 257.66, is amended to read:

 

257.66 [JUDGMENT OR ORDER.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DETERMINATIVE.] The judgment or order of the court determining the existence or nonexistence of the parent and child relationship is determinative for all purposes.

 

Subd. 2. [NEW BIRTH RECORD.] If the judgment or order of the court is at variance with the child's birth record, the court shall order that a new birth record be issued under section 257.73.

 

Subd. 3. [JUDGMENT; ORDER.] The judgment or order shall contain provisions concerning the duty of support, the custody of the child, the name of the child, the Social Security number of the mother, father, and child, if known at the time of adjudication, parenting time with the child, the furnishing of bond or other security for the payment of the judgment, or any other matter in the best interest of the child. Custody and parenting time and all subsequent motions related to them shall proceed and be determined under section 257.541. The remaining matters and all subsequent motions related to them shall proceed and be determined in accordance with chapter 518. The judgment or order may direct the appropriate party to pay all or a proportion of the reasonable expenses of the mother's pregnancy and confinement, including the mother's lost wages due to medical necessity, after consideration of the relevant facts, including the relative financial means of the parents; the earning ability of each parent; and any health insurance policies held by either parent, or by a spouse or parent of the parent, which would provide benefits for the expenses incurred by the mother during her pregnancy and confinement. Pregnancy and confinement expenses and genetic testing costs, submitted by the public authority, are admissible as evidence without third-party foundation testimony and constitute prima facie evidence of the amounts incurred for those services or for the genetic testing. Remedies available for the collection and enforcement of child support apply to confinement costs and are considered additional child support.

 

Subd. 4. [STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.] Support judgments or orders ordinarily shall be for periodic payments which may vary in amount. In the best interest of the child, a lump sum payment may be ordered in lieu of periodic payments of support. The court shall limit the parent's liability for past support of the child to the proportion of the expenses that the court deems just, which were incurred in the two years immediately preceding the commencement of the action. In determining the amount of the parent's liability for past support, the court may deviate downward from the guidelines if:

 

(1) the child for whom child support is sought is more than five years old and the obligor discovered or was informed of the existence of the parent and child relationship within one year of commencement of the action seeking child support;

 

(2) the obligor is a custodian for or pays support for other children; and

 

(3) the obligor's family income is less than 175 percent of the federal poverty level.

 

Subd. 5. [ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.] Any order for support or maintenance issued under this section shall provide for a conspicuous notice that, if the obligor fails to make a support payment, the payment owed becomes a judgment by operation of law on and after the date the payment is due and the obligee or a public agency responsible for support enforcement may obtain entry and docketing of the judgment for the unpaid amounts under the provisions of section 548.091.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7344

Subd. 6. [REQUIRED INFORMATION.] Upon entry of judgment or order, each parent who is a party in a paternity proceeding shall:

 

(1) file with the public authority responsible for child support enforcement the party's Social Security number, residential and mailing address, telephone number, email address, if available, driver's license number, and name, address, and telephone number of any employer if the party is receiving services from the public authority or begins receiving services from the public authority;

 

(2) file the information in clause (1) with the district court; and

 

(3) notify the court and, if applicable, the public authority responsible for child support enforcement of any change in the information required under this section within ten days of the change."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Smith moved to amend S. F. No. 1758, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, after line 6, insert:

 

"ARTICLE 1

 

PRESUMPTIVE PARENTAGE"

 

Page 4, after line 30, insert:

 

"ARTICLE 2

 

MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION, LEGAL SEPARATION, AND ANNULMENT

 

Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 357.021, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 8. [MARITAL DISSOLUTION FEE.] (a) The court administrator shall collect in each proceeding in the district seeking a dissolution of a marriage or a legal separation, in the manner in which other fees are collected, a marital dissolution fee in the amount of $25 from:

 

(1) the petitioner instituting the marital dissolution or legal separation, to be collected at the time of the filing of the first paper; and

 

(2) the respondent who appears, to be collected at the time of the filing of the first paper by the respondent or at the time when the respondent's appearance is entered in the case.

 

(b) The court administrator shall forward the marital dissolution fee to the commissioner of finance for deposit in the general fund.

 

(c) This subdivision sunsets June 30, 2005.

 

[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective July 1, 2004.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7345

Sec. 2. [517A.29] [SIX-MONTH REVIEW.]

 

(a) A request for a six-month review hearing form must be attached to a decree of dissolution or legal separation or an order that initially establishes child custody, parenting time, or support rights and obligations of parents. The state court administrator is requested to prepare the request for review hearing form. The form must include information regarding the procedures for requesting a hearing, the purpose of the hearing, and any other information regarding a hearing under this section that the state court administrator deems necessary.

 

(b) The six-month review hearing shall be held if any party submits a written request for a hearing within six months after entry of a decree of dissolution or legal separation or order that establishes child custody, parenting time, or support.

 

(c) Upon receipt of a completed request for hearing form, the court administrator shall provide notice of the hearing to all other parties and the public authority.

 

(d) At the six-month hearing, the court must review:

 

(1) whether child support is current; and

 

(2) whether both parties are complying with the parenting time provisions of the order.

 

(e) At the six-month hearing, the obligor has the burden to present evidence to establish that child support payments are current. A party may request that the public authority provide information to the parties and court regarding child support payments. A party must request the information from the public authority at least 14 days before the hearing. The commissioner of human services must develop a form to be used by the public authority to submit child support payment information to the parties and court.

 

(f) Contempt of court and all statutory remedies for child support and parenting time enforcement may be imposed by the court at the six-month hearing for noncompliance by either party pursuant to chapters 517C and 588 and the Minnesota Court Rules.

 

Sec. 3. [517A.36] [MAINTENANCE PAYMENT ENFORCEMENT.]

 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), the enforcement requirements and procedures in chapter 517C apply to a maintenance obligation, including a maintenance obligation that is or was combined with a child support obligation and is part of a support order as defined in section 517A.02, subdivision 14.

 

(b) The enforcement requirements and procedures in sections 517C.04; 517C.10, subdivisions 1, 2, and 5; 517C.12, subdivision 4; 517C.13; 517C.22; 517C.23; 517C.27; 517C.28; 517C.30; 517C.63; 517C.73; 517C.80; and 517C.84, do not apply to a maintenance obligation whether or not the obligation is or was combined with a child support obligation.

 

Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.002, is amended to read:

 

518.002 [USE TERM DISSOLUTION MEANING OF DIVORCE.]

 

Wherever the word "Divorce" is, as used in the statutes, it has the same meaning as "dissolution" or "dissolution of marriage."


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7346

Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.003, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [SCOPE.] For the purposes of The definitions in this section apply to this chapter, the following terms have the meanings provided in this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

 

Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.005, is amended to read:

 

518.005 [RULES GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [APPLICABLE RULES.] Unless otherwise specifically provided, the Rules of Civil Procedure for the district court apply to all proceedings under this chapter and chapters 517B and 517C.

 

Subd. 2. [TITLE.] A proceeding for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, or annulment shall must be entitled "In re the Marriage of .......... and .......... ." A custody or support proceeding shall be entitled "In re the (Custody) (Support) of .......... ."

 

Subd. 3. [NAMES OF PLEADINGS.] The initial pleading in all proceedings under sections 518.002 to 518.66 shall this chapter and chapters 517B and 517C must be denominated a petition. A responsive pleading shall must be denominated an answer. Other pleadings shall must be denominated as provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure.

 

Subd. 4. [DECREE; JUDGMENT.] In sections 518.002 to 518.66 this chapter and chapters 517B and 517C, "decree" includes "judgment."

 

Subd. 5. [PROHIBITED DISCLOSURE.] In all proceedings under this chapter and chapters 517B and 517C, in which public assistance is assigned under section 256.741 or the public authority provides services to a party or parties to the proceedings, notwithstanding statutory or other authorization for the public authority to release private data on the location of a party to the action, information on the location of one party may not be released by the public authority to the other party if:

 

(1) the public authority has knowledge that a protective order with respect to the other party has been entered; or

 

(2) the public authority has reason to believe that the release of the information may result in physical or emotional harm to the other party.

 

Subd. 6. [REQUIRED NOTICE.] Every court order or judgment and decree that provides for child support, spousal maintenance, custody, or parenting time must contain the notices required by section 517C.99.

 

Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.01, is amended to read:

 

518.01 [VOID MARRIAGES.]

 

All marriages which are A marriage prohibited by section 517.03 shall be absolutely is void, without any decree of dissolution or other legal proceedings; except if a person whose husband or wife has been absent for four successive years, without being known to the person to be living during that time, marries during the lifetime of the absent husband or wife, the subsequent marriage shall be is void only from the time that its nullity is duly adjudged. If the absentee is declared dead in accordance with section 576.142, the subsequent marriage shall is not be void.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7347

Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.02, is amended to read:

 

518.02 [VOIDABLE MARRIAGES.]

 

A marriage shall must be declared a nullity under the following circumstances if:

 

(a) (1) a party lacked capacity to consent to the marriage at the time the marriage was solemnized, either because of: (i) mental incapacity or infirmity and if the other party at the time the marriage was solemnized did not know of the incapacity; or because of (ii) the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other incapacitating substances; or because (iii) consent of either was party having been obtained by force or fraud and there was with no subsequent voluntary cohabitation of the parties;

 

(b) (2) a party lacks the physical capacity to consummate the marriage by sexual intercourse and the other party at the time the marriage was solemnized did not know of the incapacity; or

 

(c) (3) a party was under the age for marriage established by section 517.02 except as otherwise provided by section 517A.10.

 

Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.03, is amended to read:

 

518.03 [ACTION TO ANNUL; DECREE.]

 

An annulment shall must be commenced and, the complaint shall be filed, and proceedings had as in proceedings for dissolution. Upon due proof of the nullity of the marriage, it shall the marriage must be adjudged null and void.

 

The provisions of sections 518.54 to 518.66 this chapter and chapters 517B and 517C relating to property rights of the spouses, maintenance, support, and custody of children on dissolution of marriage are applicable to proceedings for annulment.

 

Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.04, is amended to read:

 

518.04 [INSUFFICIENT GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT.]

 

No marriage shall may be adjudged a nullity on the ground that one of the parties was under the age of legal consent if it appears that the parties had voluntarily cohabited together as husband and wife after having attained such that age; nor shall. The marriage of any an insane person must not be adjudged void after restoration of the insane person to reason, if it appears that the parties freely cohabited together as husband and wife after such the restoration to reason.

 

Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.05, is amended to read:

 

518.05 [ANNULMENT; WHEN TO BRING.]

 

An annulment may be sought by any of the following persons and must be commenced within the times specified, but in no event may an annulment be sought after the death of either party to the marriage:

 

(a) For a reason set forth in (1) under section 518.02, clause (a) (1), by either party or by the legal representative of the party who lacked capacity to consent, no later than 90 days after the petitioner obtained knowledge of the described condition;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7348

(b) For the reason set forth in (2) under section 518.02, clause (b) (2), by either party no later than one year after the petitioner obtained knowledge of the described condition;

 

(c) For the reason set forth in (3) under section 518.02, clause (c) (3), by the underaged party, or the party's parent or guardian, before the time the underaged party reaches the age at which the party could have married without satisfying the omitted requirement.

 

Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.055, is amended to read:

 

518.055 [PUTATIVE SPOUSE.]

 

Any person who has cohabited with another to whom the person is not legally married in the good faith belief that the person was married to the other is a putative spouse until knowledge of the fact that the person is not legally married terminates the status and prevents acquisition of further rights. A putative spouse acquires the rights conferred upon a legal spouse, including the right to maintenance following termination of the status, whether or not the marriage is prohibited or declared a nullity. If there is a legal spouse or other putative spouses, rights acquired by a putative spouse do not supersede the rights of the legal spouse or those acquired by other putative spouses, but the court shall must apportion property, maintenance, and support rights among the claimants as appropriate in the circumstances and in the interests of justice.

 

Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.06, is amended to read:

 

518.06 [DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; LEGAL SEPARATION; GROUNDS; UNCONTESTED LEGAL SEPARATION.]

 

Subdivision 1. [MEANING AND EFFECT OF DECREES; GROUNDS.] A dissolution of marriage is the termination of the marital relationship between a husband and wife. A decree of dissolution completely terminates the marital status of both parties. A legal separation is a court determination of the rights and responsibilities of a husband and wife arising out of the marital relationship. A decree of legal separation does not terminate the marital status of the parties.

 

A dissolution of a marriage shall must be granted by a county or district court when if the court finds that there has been an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage relationship. A decree of legal separation shall must be granted when if the court finds that one or both parties need a legal separation.

 

Defenses to divorce, dissolution and legal separation, including, but not limited to, condonation, connivance, collusion, recrimination, insanity, and lapse of time, are abolished.

 

Subd. 3. [UNCONTESTED LEGAL SEPARATION.] If one or both parties petition for a decree of legal separation and neither party contests the granting of the decree nor petitions for a decree of dissolution, the court shall must grant a decree of legal separation.

 

Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.07, is amended to read:

 

518.07 [RESIDENCE OF PARTIES.]

 

No A dissolution shall must not be granted unless (1) one of the parties has resided in this state, or has been a member of the armed services stationed in this state, for not less than at least 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the proceeding; or (2) one of the parties has been a domiciliary of this state for not less than at least 180 days immediately preceding commencement of the proceeding.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7349

Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.09, is amended to read:

 

518.09 [PROCEEDING; HOW AND WHERE BROUGHT; VENUE.]

 

A proceeding for dissolution or legal separation may be brought by either or both spouses and shall be is commenced by personal service of the summons and petition venued in the county where either spouse resides. No summons is required if a joint petition is filed. If neither party resides in the state and jurisdiction is based on the domicile of either spouse party, the proceeding may be brought in the county where either party is domiciled. If neither party resides or is domiciled in this state and jurisdiction is premised upon one of the parties being a member of the armed services stationed in this state for not less than 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the proceeding, the proceeding may be brought in the county where the member is stationed. This venue shall be is subject to the court's power of the court to change the place of hearing by consent of the parties, or when if it appears to the court that an impartial hearing cannot be had in the county where the proceedings are pending, or when if the convenience of the parties or the ends of justice would be promoted by the change. No summons shall be required if a joint petition is filed.

 

Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.091, is amended to read:

 

518.091 [SUMMONS; TEMPORARY RESTRAINING PROVISIONS.]

 

(a) Every summons must include the notice in this paragraph.

 

NOTICE OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISIONS

 

UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, SERVICE OF THIS SUMMONS MAKES THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO BOTH PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, UNLESS THEY ARE MODIFIED BY THE COURT OR THE PROCEEDING IS DISMISSED:

 

(1) NEITHER PARTY MAY DISPOSE OF ANY ASSETS EXCEPT (i) FOR THE NECESSITIES OF LIFE OR FOR THE NECESSARY GENERATION OF INCOME OR PRESERVATION OF ASSETS, (ii) BY AN AGREEMENT IN WRITING, OR (iii) FOR RETAINING COUNSEL TO CARRY ON OR TO CONTEST THIS PROCEEDING;

 

(2) NEITHER PARTY MAY HARASS THE OTHER PARTY; AND

 

(3) ALL CURRENTLY AVAILABLE INSURANCE COVERAGE MUST BE MAINTAINED AND CONTINUED WITHOUT CHANGE IN COVERAGE OR BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION.

 

IF YOU VIOLATE ANY OF THESE PROVISIONS, YOU WILL BE SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS BY THE COURT.

 

(4) PARTIES TO A MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION PROCEEDING ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTEMPT ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA LAW. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION INCLUDES MEDIATION, ARBITRATION, AND OTHER PROCESSES AS SET FORTH IN THE DISTRICT COURT RULES. YOU MAY CONTACT THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR ABOUT RESOURCES IN YOUR AREA. IN SOME COUNTIES, IF YOU CANNOT PAY FOR MEDIATION OR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION, IN SOME COUNTIES, ASSISTANCE MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU THROUGH A NONPROFIT PROVIDER OR A COURT PROGRAM. IF YOU ARE A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC ABUSE OR THREATS OF ABUSE AS DEFINED IN MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 518B, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TRY MEDIATION AND YOU WILL NOT BE PENALIZED BY THE COURT IN LATER PROCEEDINGS.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7350

(b) Upon service of the summons, the restraining provisions contained in the notice apply by operation of law upon both parties until modified by further order of the court or dismissal of the proceeding, unless more than one year has passed since the last document was filed with the court.

 

Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.10, is amended to read:

 

518.10 [REQUISITES OF PETITION.]

 

The A petition for dissolution of marriage or legal separation shall must state and allege:

 

(a) (1) the name, address, and, in circumstances in which child support or spousal maintenance will be addressed, Social Security number of the petitioner and any prior or other name used by the petitioner;

 

(b) (2) the name and, if known, the address and, in circumstances in which child support or spousal maintenance will be addressed, Social Security number of the respondent and any prior or other name used by the respondent and known to the petitioner;

 

(c) (3) the place and date of the marriage of the parties;

 

(d) (4) in the case of a petition for dissolution, that either the petitioner or the respondent or both:

 

(1) (i) has resided in this state for not less than 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the proceeding, or;

 

(2) (ii) has been a member of the armed services and has been stationed in this state for not less than 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the proceeding,; or

 

(3) (iii) has been a domiciliary of this state for not less than 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the proceeding;

 

(e) (5) the name at the time of the petition and any prior or other name, Social Security number, age, and date of birth of each living minor or dependent child of the parties born before the marriage or born or adopted during the marriage and a reference to, and the expected date of birth of, a child of the parties conceived during the marriage but not born;

 

(f) (6) whether or not a separate proceeding for dissolution, legal separation, or custody is pending in a court in this state or elsewhere;

 

(g) (7) in the case of a petition for dissolution, that there has been an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage relationship;

 

(h) (8) in the case of a petition for legal separation, that there is a need for a decree of legal separation;

 

(i) (9) any temporary or permanent maintenance, child support, child custody, disposition of property, attorneys' fees, costs and disbursements applied for without setting forth the amounts; and

 

(j) (10) whether an order for protection under chapter 518B or a similar law of another state that governs the parties or a party and a minor child of the parties is in effect and, if so, the district court or similar jurisdiction in which it was entered.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7351

The petition shall must be verified by the petitioner or petitioners, and its allegations established by competent evidence.

 

Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.11, is amended to read:

 

518.11 [SERVICE; ALTERNATE SERVICE; PUBLICATION.]

 

(a) Unless a proceeding is brought by both parties, copies of the summons and petition shall must be served on the respondent personally.

 

(b) When Service is made out of this state and within the United States, it may be proved by the affidavit of the person making the same service. When Service is made without outside of the United States it may be proved by the affidavit of the person making the same service, taken before and certified:

 

(1) by any United States minister, charge d'affaires, commissioner, consul or commercial agent, or other consular or diplomatic officer of the United States appointed to reside in such the country, including all deputies a deputy or other representatives representative of such the officer authorized to perform their the officer's duties; or

 

(2) before an officer authorized to administer an oath with the certificate of an officer of a court of record of the country wherein such in which the affidavit is taken as to the identity and authority of the officer taking the same affidavit.

 

(c) If personal service cannot be made, the court may order service of the summons by alternate means. The application for alternate service must include the last known location of the respondent; the petitioner's most recent contacts with the respondent; the last known location of the respondent's employment; the names and locations of the respondent's parents, siblings, children, and other close relatives; the names and locations of other persons who are likely to know the respondent's whereabouts; and a description of efforts to locate those persons.

 

The court shall must consider the length of time the respondent's location has been unknown, the likelihood that the respondent's location will become known, the nature of the relief sought, and the nature of efforts made to locate the respondent. The court shall must order service by first class mail, forwarding address requested, to any addresses where there is a reasonable possibility that mail or information will be forwarded or communicated to the respondent or, if no address so qualifies, then to the respondent's last known address.

 

If the petitioner seeks disposition of real estate located within the state of in Minnesota, the court shall must order that the summons, which shall must contain the legal description of the real estate, be published in the county where the real estate is located. The court may also order publication, within or without the state, but only if it might reasonably succeed in notifying the respondent of the proceeding. Also, the court may require the petitioner to make efforts to locate the respondent by telephone calls to appropriate persons. Service shall be is deemed complete 21 days after mailing or 21 days after court-ordered publication.

 

Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.12, is amended to read:

 

518.12 [TIME FOR ANSWERING.]

 

The respondent shall have has 30 days in which to answer the petition. In case of service by publication, the 30 days shall does not begin to run until the expiration of the period allowed for publication. In the case of a counterpetition for dissolution or legal separation to a petition for dissolution or legal separation, no answer shall be is required to the counterpetition and the original petitioner shall be is deemed to have denied each and every statement, allegation, and claim in the counterpetition.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7352

Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.13, is amended to read:

 

518.13 [FAILURE TO ANSWER; FINDINGS; HEARING.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DEFAULT.] If the respondent does not appear after service duly made and proved, the court may hear and determine the proceeding as a default matter.

 

Subd. 2. [DISPUTE OVER IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN.] If one of the parties has denied under oath or affirmation that the marriage is irretrievably broken, the court shall must consider all relevant factors, including the circumstances that gave rise to the commencement of the proceeding and the prospect of reconciliation, and shall make a finding whether the marriage is irretrievably broken.

 

A finding of irretrievable breakdown under this subdivision is a determination that there is no reasonable prospect of reconciliation. The finding must be supported by evidence that (i) the parties have lived separate and apart for a period of not less than 180 days immediately preceding the commencement of the proceeding, or (ii) there is serious marital discord adversely affecting the attitude of one or both of the parties toward the marriage.

 

Subd. 3. [AGREEMENT OVER IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN.] If both parties by petition or otherwise have stated under oath or affirmation that the marriage is irretrievably broken, or one of the parties has so stated and the other has not denied it, the court, after hearing, shall must make a finding that the marriage is irretrievably broken.

 

Subd. 4. [REFEREE; OPEN COURT.] The court or judge, upon application, may refer the proceeding to a referee to take and report the evidence therein. Hearings for dissolution of marriage shall must be heard in open court or before a referee appointed by the court to receive the testimony of the witnesses, or depositions taken as in other equitable actions. However, the court may in its discretion close the hearing.

 

Subd. 5. [APPROVAL WITHOUT HEARING.] Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, order for judgment, and judgment and decree must be submitted to the court for approval and filing without a final hearing in the following situations:

 

(1) if there are no minor children of the marriage, and (i) the parties have entered into a written stipulation, or (ii) the respondent has not appeared after service duly made and proved by affidavit and at least 20 days have elapsed since the time for answering under section 518.12 expired; or

 

(2) if there are minor children of the marriage, the parties have signed and acknowledged a stipulation, and all parties are represented by counsel.

 

Notwithstanding clause (1) or (2), the court shall must schedule the matter for hearing in any case where if the proposed judgment and decree does not appear to be in the best interests of the minor children or is contrary to the interests of justice.

 

Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.131, is amended to read:

 

518.131 [TEMPORARY ORDERS AND RESTRAINING ORDERS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [PERMISSIBLE ORDERS.] In a proceeding brought for custody, dissolution, or legal separation, or for disposition of property, or maintenance, or child support following the dissolution of a marriage, either party may, by motion, request from the court and the court may grant a temporary order pending the final disposition of the proceeding to or for:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7353

(a) (1) temporary custody and parenting time regarding the minor children of the parties;

 

(b) (2) temporary maintenance of either spouse;

 

(c) Temporary child support for the children of the parties;

 

(d) (3) temporary costs and reasonable attorney fees;

 

(e) Award the (4) temporary use and possession, exclusive or otherwise, of the family home, furniture, household goods, automobiles, and other property of the parties;

 

(f) (5) restrain one or both parties from transferring, encumbering, concealing, or disposing of property except in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life, and to account to the court for all such transfers, encumbrances, dispositions, and expenditures made after the order is served or communicated to the party restrained in open court;

 

(g) (6) restrain one or both parties from harassing, vilifying, mistreating, molesting, disturbing the peace, or restraining the liberty of the other party or the children of the parties;

 

(h) (7) restrain one or both parties from removing any minor child of the parties from the jurisdiction of the court;

 

(i) (8) exclude a party from the family home of the parties or from the home of the other party; and

 

(j) (9) require one or both of the parties to perform or to not perform such additional acts as that will facilitate the just and speedy disposition of the proceeding, or will protect the parties or their children from physical or emotional harm.

 

Subd. 2. [IMPERMISSIBLE ORDERS.] No A temporary order shall must not:

 

(a) (1) deny parenting time to a parent unless the court finds that the parenting time is likely to cause physical or emotional harm to the child;

 

(b) (2) exclude a party from the family home of the parties unless the court finds that physical or emotional harm to one of the parties or to the children of the parties is likely to result, or that the exclusion is reasonable in the circumstances; or

 

(c) (3) vacate or modify an order granted under section 518B.01, subdivision 6, paragraph (a), clause (1), restraining an abusing party from committing acts of domestic abuse, except that the court may hear a motion for modification of an order for protection concurrently with a proceeding for dissolution of marriage upon notice of motion and motion. The notice required by court rule shall must not be waived. If the proceedings are consolidated and the motion to modify is granted, a separate order for modification of an order for protection shall must be issued.

 

Subd. 3. [EX PARTE RESTRAINING ORDER; LIMITATIONS.] A party may request and the court may make an ex parte restraining order which may include that includes any matter that may be included in a temporary order except it may not:

 

(a) A restraining order may not (1) exclude either party from the family home of the parties except upon a finding by the court of immediate danger of physical harm to the other party or the children of either party; and or

 

(b) A restraining order may not (2) deny parenting time to either party or grant custody of the minor children to either party except upon a finding by the court of immediate danger of physical harm to the minor children of the parties.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7354

Subd. 4. [HEARING ON RESTRAINING ORDER; DURATION.] A restraining orders shall order must be personally served upon the party to be restrained and shall be accompanied along with a notice of the time and place of a hearing for a temporary order for disposition of the matters contained in the restraining order at a hearing for a temporary order. When If a restraining order has been issued, a hearing on the temporary order shall must be held at the earliest practicable date. The restrained party may upon written notice to the other party advance the hearing date to a time earlier than that noticed by the other party. The restraining order shall continue continues in full force and effect only until the hearing time noticed, unless the court, for good cause and upon notice, extends the time for hearing.

 

Subd. 5. [DURATION OF TEMPORARY ORDER.] A temporary order shall continue continues in full force and effect until the earlier of its amendment or vacation, dismissal of the main action, or entry of a final decree of dissolution or legal separation.

 

Subd. 6. [EFFECT OF DISMISSAL OF MAIN ACTION.] If a proceeding for dissolution or legal separation is dismissed, a temporary custody order is vacated unless one of the parties or the child's custodian moves that the proceeding continue as a custody proceeding and the court finds, after a hearing, that the circumstances of the parties and the best interests of the child require that a custody order be issued.

 

Subd. 7. [GUIDING FACTORS.] The court shall must be guided by the factors set forth in sections 518.551 (concerning child support), 518.552 (concerning maintenance), 518.17 to 518.175 517B.17, 517B.18, and 517B.25 (concerning custody and parenting time), and 518.14 (concerning costs and attorney fees) in making temporary orders and restraining orders.

 

Subd. 8. [BASIS FOR ORDER.] Temporary orders shall must be made solely on the basis of affidavits and argument of counsel except upon demand by either party in a motion or responsive motion made within the time limit for making and filing a responsive motion that the matter be heard on oral testimony before the court, or if the court in its discretion orders the taking of oral testimony.

 

Subd. 9. [PREJUDICIAL EFFECT, REVOCATION; MODIFICATION.] A temporary order or restraining order:

 

(a) Shall (1) must not prejudice the rights of the parties or the child which are to be adjudicated at subsequent hearings in the proceeding; and

 

(b) (2) may be revoked or modified by the court before the final disposition of the proceeding upon the same grounds and subject to the same requirements as the initial granting of the order.

 

Subd. 10. [MISDEMEANOR.] In addition to being punishable by contempt, a violation of a provision of a temporary order or restraining order granting the relief authorized in subdivision 1, clause (g) (6), (h) (7), or (i) (8), is a misdemeanor.

 

Subd. 11. [TEMPORARY SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE.] Temporary support and maintenance may be ordered during the time a parenting plan is being developed under section 518.1705.

 

Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.14, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [GENERAL.] (a) Except as provided in subdivision 2, in a proceeding under this chapter or chapter 517B or 517C, the court shall must award attorney fees, costs, and disbursements in an amount necessary to enable a party to carry on or contest the proceeding, provided if it finds that:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7355

(1) that the fees are necessary for the good-faith assertion of the party's rights in the proceeding and will not contribute unnecessarily to the length and expense of the proceeding;

 

(2) that the party from whom fees, costs, and disbursements are sought has the means to pay them; and

 

(3) that the party to whom fees, costs, and disbursements are awarded does not have the means to pay them.

 

(b) Nothing in this section precludes the court from awarding, in its discretion, additional fees, costs, and disbursements against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding. Fees, costs, and disbursements provided for in this section may be awarded at any point in the proceeding, including a modification proceeding under sections 518.18 and 518.64. The court may adjudge costs and disbursements against either party. The court may authorize the collection of money awarded by execution, or out of property sequestered, or in any other manner within the power of the court. An award of attorney's fees made by the court during the pendency of the proceeding or in the final judgment survives the proceeding and if not paid by the party directed to pay the same them may be enforced as above provided in the manner provided in this paragraph or by a separate civil action brought in the attorney's own name. If the proceeding is dismissed or abandoned prior to determination and award of attorney's fees, the court may nevertheless award attorney's fees upon the attorney's motion. The award shall also survive survives the proceeding and may be enforced in the same manner as last above provided in this paragraph.

 

Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.148, is amended to read:

 

518.148 [CERTIFICATION OF DISSOLUTION.]

 

Subdivision 1. [CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION.] An attorney or pro se party may prepare and submit to the court a separate certificate of dissolution to be attached to the judgment and decree at the time of granting the dissolution of marriage. Upon approval by the court and filing of the certificate of dissolution with the court administrator, the court administrator shall must provide to any party upon request certified copies of the certificate of dissolution.

 

Subd. 2. [REQUIRED INFORMATION.] The certificate shall must include the following information:

 

(1) the full caption and file number of the case and the title "Certificate of Dissolution";

 

(2) the names and any prior or other names of the parties to the dissolution;

 

(3) the names of any living minor or dependent children as identified in the judgment and decree;

 

(4) that the marriage of the parties is dissolved;

 

(5) the date of the judgment and decree; and

 

(6) the Social Security number of the parties to the dissolution and the social security number of any living minor or dependent children identified in the judgment and decree.

 

Subd. 3. [CERTIFICATION.] The certificate of dissolution shall be is conclusive evidence of the facts recited in the certificate.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7356

Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.191, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [ABBREVIATED JUDGMENT AND DECREE.] If real estate is described in a judgment and decree of dissolution, the court may direct either of the parties or their legal counsel to prepare and submit to the court a proposed summary real estate disposition judgment. Upon approval by the court and filing of the summary real estate disposition judgment with the court administrator, the court administrator shall must provide to any party upon request certified copies of the summary real estate disposition judgment.

 

Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.195, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. [PROCEDURE.] A couple qualifying under all of the criteria in subdivision 1, may obtain a judgment and decree by:

 

(1) filing a sworn joint declaration, on which both of their signatures must be notarized, containing or appending the following information:

 

(i) the demographic data required in section 518.10;

 

(ii) verifying the qualifications set forth in subdivision 1;

 

(iii) listing each party's nonmarital property;

 

(iv) setting forth how the marital assets and debts will be apportioned;

 

(v) verifying both parties' income and preserving their rights to spousal maintenance; and

 

(vi) certifying that there has been no domestic abuse of one party by the other; and

 

(2) viewing any introductory and summary process educational videotapes, if then available from the court, and certifying that they watched any such tapes within the 30 days preceding the filing of the joint declaration.

 

The district court administrator shall must enter a decree of dissolution 30 days after the filing of the joint declaration if the parties meet the statutory qualifications and have complied with the procedural requirements of this subdivision.

 

Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.195, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. [FORMS.] The state court administrator shall must develop simplified forms and instructions for the summary process. District court administrators shall must make the forms for the summary process available upon request and shall must accept joint declarations for filing on and after July 1, 1997.

 

Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.24, is amended to read:

 

518.24 [SECURITY; SEQUESTRATION; CONTEMPT.]

 

In all cases when If maintenance or support payments are ordered, the court may require sufficient security to be given for the payment of them according to the terms of the order. Upon neglect or refusal to give security, or upon failure to pay the maintenance or support, the court may sequester the obligor's personal estate and the rents and profits of real estate of the obligor, and appoint a receiver of them. The court may cause the personal estate and the rents and profits of the real estate to be applied according to the terms of the order. The obligor is presumed to have an income from a source sufficient to pay the maintenance or support order. A child support or maintenance order constitutes prima facie evidence that the obligor has the ability to pay the award. If the obligor disobeys the order, it is prima facie evidence of contempt. The court may cite the obligor for contempt under this section, section 518.617, or chapter 588.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7357

Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.25, is amended to read:

 

518.25 [REMARRIAGE; REVOCATION.]

 

When a dissolution has been granted, and the parties afterward intermarry If two people remarry each other after dissolution of their prior marriage, the court, upon their joint application, and upon satisfactory proof of such the marriage, may revoke all decrees and orders of dissolution, maintenance, and subsistence which will that do not affect the rights of third persons.

 

Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.27, is amended to read:

 

518.27 [NAME OF PARTY.]

 

Except as provided in section 259.13, in the final decree of dissolution or legal separation the court shall must, if requested by a party, change the name of that party to another name as the party requests. The court shall must grant a request unless it finds that there is an intent to defraud or mislead, unless the name change is subject to section 259.13, in which case the requirements of that section apply. The court shall must notify the parties that use of a different surname after dissolution or legal separation without complying with section 259.13, if applicable, is a gross misdemeanor. The party's new name shall must be so designated in the final decree.

 

Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.54, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [TERMS SCOPE.] For the purposes of sections 518.54 to 518.66, the terms defined The definitions in this section shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them apply to sections 517A.31 to 517A.41.

 

Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.54, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5. [MARITAL PROPERTY; EXCEPTIONS.] "Marital property" means property, real or personal property, including vested public or private pension plan benefits or rights, acquired by one or both of the parties, or either of them, to a dissolution, legal separation, or annulment proceeding at any time during the existence of the marriage relation between them, or at any time during which the parties were living together as husband and wife under a purported marriage relationship which is annulled in an annulment proceeding, but prior to the date of valuation under section 518.58, subdivision 1. All property acquired by either spouse subsequent to the marriage and before the valuation date is presumed to be marital property regardless of whether title is held individually or by the spouses in a form of coownership such as joint tenancy, tenancy in common, tenancy by the entirety, or community property. Each spouse shall be is deemed to have a common ownership in marital property that vests not later than the time of the entry of the decree in a proceeding for dissolution or annulment. The extent of the vested interest shall must be determined and made final by the court pursuant to section 518.58. If a title interest in real property is held individually by only one spouse, the interest in the real property of the nontitled spouse is not subject to claims of creditors or judgment or tax liens until the time of entry of the decree awarding an interest to the nontitled spouse. The presumption of marital property is overcome by a showing that the property is nonmarital property.

 

"Nonmarital property" means property real or personal, acquired by either spouse before, during, or after the existence of their marriage, which:

 

(a) (1) is acquired as a gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance made by a third party to one but not to the other spouse;

 

(b) (2) is acquired before the marriage;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7358

(c) (3) is acquired in exchange for or is the increase in value of property which is described in clauses (a), (b), (d), and (e) clause (1), (2), (4), or (5);

 

(d) (4) is acquired by a spouse after the valuation date; or

 

(e) (5) is excluded by a valid antenuptial contract.

 

Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.54, subdivision 6, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 6. [INCOME.] "Income" means any form of periodic payment to an individual including, but not limited to, wages, salaries, payments to an independent contractor, workers' compensation, unemployment benefits, and annuity, military and or naval retirement, pension and or disability payments. "Income" does not include benefits received under Title IV-A of the Social Security Act and or chapter 256J are not income under this section.

 

Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.54, subdivision 7, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 7. [OBLIGEE.] "Obligee" means a person to whom payments for maintenance or support are owed.

 

Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.54, subdivision 8, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 8. [OBLIGOR.] "Obligor" means a person obligated to pay maintenance or support. A person who is designated as the sole physical custodian of a child is presumed not to be an obligor for purposes of calculating current support under section 518.551 unless the court makes specific written findings to overcome this presumption.

 

Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.55, is amended to read:

 

518.55 [MAINTENANCE OR SUPPORT MONEY.]

 

Subdivision 1. [CONTENTS OF ORDER.] Every award of maintenance or support money in a judgment of dissolution or legal separation shall must clearly designate whether the same it is maintenance or support money, or what part of the award is maintenance and what part is support money. An award of payments from future income or earnings of the parent with whom the child resides is presumed to be maintenance and an award of payments from the future income or earnings of the parent with whom the child does not reside is presumed to be support money, unless otherwise designated by the court. In a judgment of dissolution or legal separation the court may determine, as one of the issues of the case, whether or not either spouse is entitled to an award of maintenance notwithstanding that no award is then made, or it may reserve jurisdiction of the issue of maintenance for determination at a later date.

 

Subd. 3. [NOTICE OF ADDRESS OR RESIDENCE CHANGE.] Every obligor shall must notify the obligee and the public authority responsible for collection, if applicable, of a change of address or residence within 60 days of the address or residence change. Every order for support or maintenance must contain a conspicuous notice complying with section 518.68, subdivision 2 517C.99. The court may waive or modify the requirements of this subdivision by order if necessary to protect the obligor from contact by the obligee.

 

Subd. 4. [DETERMINATION OF CONTROLLING ORDER.] The public authority or a party may request the district court to determine a controlling order in situations in which more than one order involving the same obligor and child exists.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7359

Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.552, is amended to read:

 

518.552 [MAINTENANCE.]

 

Subdivision 1. [JURISDICTION; GROUNDS.] In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, or in a proceeding for maintenance following dissolution of the marriage by a court which lacked personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse and which has since acquired jurisdiction, the court may grant a maintenance order for either spouse if it finds that the spouse seeking maintenance:

 

(a) (1) lacks sufficient property, including marital property apportioned to the spouse, to provide for reasonable needs of the spouse considering the standard of living established during the marriage, especially, but not limited to, a period of training or education,; or

 

(b) (2) is unable to provide adequate self-support, after considering the standard of living established during the marriage and all relevant circumstances, through appropriate employment,; or is the custodian of

 

(3) if a child whose resides with the spouse and the child's condition or circumstances make it appropriate that the custodian spouse not be required to seek employment outside the home.

 

Subd. 2. [AMOUNT; DURATION.] The maintenance order shall must be in amounts and for periods of time, either temporary or permanent, as that the court deems just, without regard to marital misconduct, and after considering all relevant factors including:

 

(a) (1) the financial resources of the party seeking maintenance, including marital property apportioned to the party, and the party's ability to meet needs independently, including the extent to which a provision for support of a child living with the party includes a sum for that party as custodian caretaker;

 

(b) (2) the time necessary to acquire sufficient education or training to enable the party seeking maintenance to find appropriate employment, and the probability, given the party's age and skills, of completing education or training and becoming fully or partially self-supporting;

 

(c) (3) the standard of living established during the marriage;

 

(d) (4) the duration of the marriage and, in the case of a homemaker, the length of absence from employment and the extent to which any education, skills, or experience have become outmoded and earning capacity has become permanently diminished;

 

(e) (5) the loss of earnings, seniority, retirement benefits, and other employment opportunities forgone by the spouse seeking spousal maintenance;

 

(f) (6) the age, and the physical and emotional condition of the spouse seeking maintenance;

 

(g) (7) the ability of the spouse from whom maintenance is sought to meet needs while meeting those of the spouse seeking maintenance; and

 

(h) (8) the contribution of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property, as well as the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker or in furtherance of the other party's employment or business.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7360

Subd. 3. [PERMANENCY OF AWARD.] Nothing in This section shall must not be construed to favor a temporary award of maintenance over a permanent award, where if the factors under subdivision 2 justify a permanent award.

 

Where If there is some uncertainty as to the necessity of a permanent award, the court shall must order a permanent award leaving its order open for later modification.

 

Subd. 4. [REOPENING MAINTENANCE AWARDS.] Section 518.145, subdivision 2, applies to maintenance awards of spousal maintenance.

 

Subd. 5. [PRIVATE AGREEMENTS.] The parties may expressly preclude or limit modification of maintenance through a stipulation, if the court makes specific findings that the stipulation is fair and, equitable, is and supported by consideration described in the findings, and that full disclosure of each party's financial circumstances has occurred. The stipulation must be made a part of the judgment and decree.

 

Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.58, is amended to read:

 

518.58 [DIVISION OF MARITAL PROPERTY.]

 

Subdivision 1. [GENERAL.] Upon a dissolution of a marriage, an annulment, or in a proceeding for disposition of property following a dissolution of marriage by a court which lacked personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse or lacked jurisdiction to dispose of the property and which has since acquired jurisdiction, the court shall must make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties without regard to marital misconduct, after making findings regarding the division of the property. The court shall must base its findings on all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets, and income of each party. The court shall must also consider the contribution of each in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property, as well as the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker. It shall be is conclusively presumed that each spouse made a substantial contribution to the acquisition of income and property while they were living together as husband and wife. The court may also award to either spouse the household goods and furniture of the parties, whether or not acquired during the marriage. The court shall must value marital assets for purposes of division between the parties as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference, unless a different date is agreed upon by the parties, or unless the court makes specific findings that another date of valuation is fair and equitable. If there is a substantial change in value of an asset between the date of valuation and the final distribution, the court may adjust the valuation of that asset as necessary to effect an equitable distribution.

 

Subd. 1a. [TRANSFER, ENCUMBRANCE, CONCEALMENT, OR DISPOSITION OF MARITAL ASSETS.] In contemplation of commencing or during the pendency of a marriage dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, or in contemplation of commencing a marriage dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, each party owes a fiduciary duty to the other for any profit or loss derived by the party, without the consent of the other, from a transaction or from any use by the party of the marital assets. If the court finds that a party to a marriage, without consent of the other party, has in contemplation of commencing, or during the pendency of, the current dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of marital assets except in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life, the court shall must compensate the other party by placing both parties in the same position that they would have been in had the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal not occurred. The burden of proof under this subdivision is on the party claiming that the other party transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of marital assets in contemplation of commencing or during the pendency of the current dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, without consent of the claiming


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7361

party, and that the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal was not in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life. In compensating a party under this section, the court, in dividing the marital property, may impute the entire value of an asset and a fair return on the asset to the party who transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of it. Use of a power of attorney, or the absence of a restraining order against the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal of marital property is not available as a defense under this subdivision.

 

Subd. 2. [AWARD OF NONMARITAL PROPERTY.] If the court finds that either spouse's resources or property, including the spouse's portion of the marital property as defined in section 518.54, subdivision 5, are so inadequate as to work an unfair hardship, considering all relevant circumstances, the court may, in addition to the marital property, apportion up to one-half of the property otherwise excluded under section 518.54, subdivision 5, clauses (a) (1) to (d) (4), to prevent the unfair hardship. If the court apportions property other than marital property, it shall must make findings in support of the apportionment. The findings shall must be based on all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, and opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets and income of each party.

 

Subd. 3. [SALE OR DISTRIBUTION WHILE PROCEEDING PENDING.] (a) If the court finds that it is necessary to preserve the marital assets of the parties, the court may order the sale of the homestead of the parties or the sale of other marital assets, as the individual circumstances may require, during the pendency of a proceeding for a dissolution of marriage or an annulment. If the court orders a sale, it may further provide for the disposition of the funds received from the sale during the pendency of the proceeding. If liquid or readily liquidated marital property other than property representing vested pension benefits or rights is available, the court, so far as possible, shall must divide the property representing vested pension benefits or rights by the disposition of an equivalent amount of the liquid or readily liquidated property.

 

(b) The court may order a partial distribution of marital assets during the pendency of a proceeding for a dissolution of marriage or an annulment for good cause shown or upon the request of both parties, provided that as long as the court shall fully protect protects the interests of the other party.

 

Subd. 4. [PENSION PLANS.] (a) The division of marital property that represents pension plan benefits or rights in the form of future pension plan payments:

 

(1) is payable only to the extent of the amount of the pension plan benefit payable under the terms of the plan;

 

(2) is not payable for a period that exceeds the time that pension plan benefits are payable to the pension plan benefit recipient;

 

(3) is not payable in a lump sum amount from pension plan assets attributable in any fashion to a spouse with the status of an active member, deferred retiree, or benefit recipient of a pension plan;

 

(4) if the former spouse to whom the payments are to be made dies prior to the end of the specified payment period with the right to any remaining payments accruing to an estate or to more than one survivor, is payable only to a trustee on behalf of the estate or the group of survivors for subsequent apportionment by the trustee; and

 

(5) in the case of public pension plan benefits or rights, may not commence until the public plan member submits a valid application for a public pension plan benefit and the benefit becomes payable.

 

(b) The An individual retirement account plans plan established under chapter 354B may provide in its plan document, if published and made generally available, for an alternative marital property division or distribution of individual retirement account plan assets. If an alternative division or distribution procedure is provided, it applies in place of paragraph (a), clause (5).


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7362

Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.581, is amended to read:

 

518.581 [SURVIVING SPOUSE BENEFIT.]

 

Subdivision 1. [AWARD OF BENEFIT.] If a current or former employee's marriage is dissolved, the court may order the employee, the employee's pension plan, or both, to pay amounts as part of the division of pension rights that the court may make under section 518.58, or as an award of maintenance in the form of a percentage of periodic or other payments or in the form of a fixed dollar amount. The court may, as part of the order, award a former spouse all or part of a survivor benefit unless the plan does not allow by law the payment of a surviving spouse benefit to a former spouse.

 

Subd. 2. [PAYMENT OF FUNDS BY RETIREMENT PLAN.] (a) If the court has ordered that a spouse has an interest in a pension plan, the court may order the pension plan to withhold payment of a refund upon termination of employment or lump sum distribution to the extent of the spouse's interest in the plan, or to provide survivor benefits ordered by the court.

 

(b) The court may not order the pension plan to:

 

(1) pay more than the equivalent of one surviving spouse benefit, regardless of the number of spouses or former spouses who may be sharing in a portion of the total benefit;

 

(2) pay surviving spouse benefits under circumstances where the plan member does not have a right to elect surviving spouse benefits;

 

(3) pay surviving spouse benefits to a former spouse if the former spouse would not be eligible for benefits under the terms of the plan; or

 

(4) order pay survivor benefits which, when combined with the annuity or benefit payable to the pension plan member, exceed the actuarial equivalent value of the normal retirement annuity form, determined under the plan documents of the pension plan then in effect and the actuarial assumptions then in effect for calculating optional annuity forms by the pension plan or for calculating the funding requirements of the pension plan if no optional annuity forms are provided by the pension plan.

 

(c) If more than one spouse or former spouse is entitled to a surviving spouse benefit, the pension plan shall must pay each spouse a portion of the benefit based on the ratio of the number of years the spouse was married to the plan member to the total number of years the plan member was married to spouses who are entitled to the benefit.

 

Subd. 3. [NOTICE TO FORMER SPOUSE.] A pension plan shall must notify a former spouse of an application by the employee for a refund of pension benefits if the former spouse has filed with the pension plan:

 

(1) a copy of the court order, including a withholding order, determining the former spouse's rights;

 

(2) the name and last known address of the employee; and

 

(3) the name and address of the former spouse.

 

A pension plan shall must comply with an order, including a withholding order, issued by a court having jurisdiction over dissolution of marriage that is served on the pension plan, if the order states the name, last known address of the payees, and name and address of the former spouse, or if the names and addresses are provided to the pension plan with service of the order.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7363

Subd. 4. [DEFINITIONS.] For purposes of The definitions in this subdivision apply to this section, the following terms have the meanings given in this subdivision.

 

(a) "Current or former employee" or "employee" means an individual who has an interest in a pension plan.

 

(b) "Surviving spouse benefit" means (1) a benefit a surviving spouse may be eligible for under the laws and bylaws of the pension plan if the employee dies before retirement, or (2) a benefit selected for or available to a surviving spouse under the laws and bylaws of the pension plan upon the death of the employee after retirement.

 

Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.582, is amended to read:

 

518.582 [PROCEDURE FOR VALUING PENSION BENEFITS OR RIGHTS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [APPOINTMENT OF ACTUARY.] Each A court of this state that has with jurisdiction to decide marriage dissolution matters may appoint a qualified person experienced in the valuation of pension benefits and rights to function as an expert witness in valuing pension benefits or rights.

 

Subd. 2. [STANDARDS.] (a) A court appointed actuary shall must determine the present value of pension benefits or rights that are marital property of the parties to the action:

 

(1) based on the applicable plan documents of the pension plan and the applicable actuarial assumptions specified for use in calculating optional annuity forms by the pension plan or for funding the pension plan, if reasonable,; or

 

(2) as specified by the court.

 

(b) The court appointed actuary shall must report to the court and to the parties the present value of the pension benefits or rights that are marital property.

 

Subd. 3. [COMPENSATION.] The court appointed actuary may be compensated at a rate established by the court. The compensation of the court appointed actuary shall must be allocated between the parties as the court directs.

 

Subd. 4. [STIPULATION.] In lieu of valuing pension benefits or rights through use of the court appointed actuary, the parties may stipulate the present value of pension benefits or rights that are marital property.

 

Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.62, is amended to read:

 

518.62 [TEMPORARY ORDER; MAINTENANCE; HOMESTEAD.]

 

Temporary maintenance and temporary support may be awarded as provided in section 518.131. The court may also award to either party to the proceeding, having due regard to all the circumstances and the party awarded the custody of the children, the right to the exclusive use of the household goods and furniture of the parties pending the proceeding and the right to the use of the homestead of the parties, exclusive or otherwise, pending the proceeding. The court may order either party to remove from the homestead of the parties upon proper application to the court for an order pending the proceeding.

 

Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.64, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [AUTHORITY.] (a) After an order for temporary or permanent maintenance or support money, temporary or permanent, or for the appointment of trustees to receive property awarded as maintenance or support money, the court may from time to time, on motion of either of the parties, either party or the public authority


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7364

responsible for support enforcement may move for modification. A copy of which is a motion by a party must be served on the public authority responsible for child support enforcement if payments are made through it, or on motion of the public authority responsible for support enforcement,.

 

(b) The court may:

 

(1) modify the order respecting the amount of maintenance or support money, and the its payment of it, and also respecting the or appropriation and payment of the principal and income of property held in trust,; and may

 

(2) make an order respecting these matters which it might have made in the original proceeding, except as herein otherwise provided subject to subdivisions 2 and 3.

 

(c) A party or the public authority also may bring a motion for contempt of court if the obligor is in arrears in support or maintenance payments.

 

Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.64, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. [MODIFICATION.] (a) The terms of an order respecting maintenance or support may be modified upon a showing of one or more of the following: (1) substantially increased or decreased earnings of a party; (2) substantially increased or decreased need of a party or the child or children that are the subject of these proceedings; (3) receipt of assistance under the AFDC program formerly codified under sections 256.72 to 256.87 or 256B.01 to 256B.40, or chapter 256J or 256K; (4) a change in the cost of living for either party as measured by the Federal Bureau of Statistics, any of which makes the terms unreasonable and unfair; (5) extraordinary medical expenses of the child not provided for under section 518.171; or (6) the addition of work-related or education-related child care expenses of the obligee or a substantial increase or decrease in existing work-related or education-related child care expenses.

 

On a motion to modify support, the needs of any child the obligor has after the entry of the support order that is the subject of a modification motion shall be considered as provided by section 518.551, subdivision 5f.

 

(b) It is presumed that there has been a substantial change in circumstances under paragraph (a) and the terms of a current support order shall be rebuttably presumed to be unreasonable and unfair if:

 

(1) the application of the child support guidelines in section 518.551, subdivision 5, to the current circumstances of the parties results in a calculated court order that is at least 20 percent and at least $50 per month higher or lower than the current support order;

 

(2) the medical support provisions of the order established under section 518.171 are not enforceable by the public authority or the obligee;

 

(3) health coverage ordered under section 518.171 is not available to the child for whom the order is established by the parent ordered to provide; or

 

(4) the existing support obligation is in the form of a statement of percentage and not a specific dollar amount.

 

(c) (b) On a motion for modification of maintenance, including a motion for the extension of the duration of a maintenance award, the court shall must apply, in addition to all other relevant factors, the factors for an award of maintenance under section 518.552 that exist at the time of the motion. On a motion for modification of support, the court:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7365

(1) shall apply section 518.551, subdivision 5, and shall not consider the financial circumstances of each party's spouse, if any; and

 

(2) shall not consider compensation received by a party for employment in excess of a 40-hour work week, provided that the party demonstrates, and the court finds, that:

 

(i) the excess employment began after entry of the existing support order;

 

(ii) the excess employment is voluntary and not a condition of employment;

 

(iii) the excess employment is in the nature of additional, part-time employment, or overtime employment compensable by the hour or fractions of an hour;

 

(iv) the party's compensation structure has not been changed for the purpose of affecting a support or maintenance obligation;

 

(v) in the case of an obligor, current child support payments are at least equal to the guidelines amount based on income not excluded under this clause; and

 

(vi) in the case of an obligor who is in arrears in child support payments to the obligee, any net income from excess employment must be used to pay the arrearages until the arrearages are paid in full.

 

(d) (c) A modification of support or maintenance, including interest that accrued pursuant to section 548.091, may be made retroactive only with respect to any period during which the petitioning party has pending a motion for modification but only from the date of service of notice of the motion on the responding party and on the public authority if public assistance is being furnished or the county attorney is the attorney of record. However, modification may be applied to an earlier period if the court makes express findings that:

 

(1) the party seeking modification was precluded from serving a motion by reason of a significant physical or mental disability, a material misrepresentation of another party, or fraud upon the court and that the party seeking modification, when no longer precluded, promptly served a motion;

 

(2) the party seeking modification was a recipient of federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title II Older Americans, Survivor's Disability Insurance (OASDI), other disability benefits, or public assistance based upon need during the period for which retroactive modification is sought;

 

(3) the order for which the party seeks amendment was entered by default, the party shows good cause for not appearing, and the record contains no factual evidence, or clearly erroneous evidence regarding the individual obligor's ability to pay; or

 

(4) the party seeking modification was institutionalized or incarcerated for an offense other than nonsupport of a child during the period for which retroactive modification is sought and lacked the financial ability to pay the support ordered during that time period. In determining whether to allow the retroactive modification, the court shall consider whether and when a request was made to the public authority for support modification.

 

The court may provide that a reduction in the amount allocated for child care expenses based on a substantial decrease in the expenses is effective as of the date the expenses decreased.

 

(e) (d) Except for an award of the right of occupancy of the homestead, provided in under section 518.63, all divisions of real and personal property provided by section 518.58 shall be are final, and may be revoked or modified only where if the court finds the existence of conditions that justify reopening a judgment under the laws


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7366

of this state, including motions under section 518.145, subdivision 2. The court may impose a lien or charge on the divided property at any time while the property, or subsequently acquired property, is owned by the parties or either of them, for the payment of maintenance or support money, or may sequester the property as is provided by under section 518.24.

 

(f) (e) The court need not hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for modification of maintenance or support.

 

(g) (f) Section 518.14 shall govern governs the award of attorney fees for motions brought under this subdivision.

 

Sec. 43. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.641, is amended to read:

 

518.641 [COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS IN MAINTENANCE OR CHILD SUPPORT ORDER.]

 

Subdivision 1. [REQUIREMENT.] (a) An order establishing, modifying, or enforcing maintenance or child support shall must provide for a biennial adjustment in the amount to be paid based on a change in the cost of living. An order that provides for a cost-of-living adjustment shall must specify the cost-of-living index to be applied and the date on which the cost-of-living adjustment shall become becomes effective. The court may use the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, Minneapolis-St. Paul (CPI-U), the Consumer Price Index for wage earners and clerical, Minneapolis-St. Paul (CPI-W), or another cost-of-living index published by the Department of Labor which it specifically finds is more appropriate. Cost-of-living increases under this section shall must be compounded. The court may also increase the amount by more than the cost-of-living adjustment by agreement of the parties or by making further findings.

 

(b) The adjustment becomes effective on the first of May of the year in which it is made, for cases in which payment is made to the public authority. For cases in which payment is not made to the public authority, application for an adjustment may be made in any month but no application for an adjustment may be made sooner than two years after the date of the dissolution decree. A court may waive the requirement of the cost-of-living clause if it expressly finds that the obligor's occupation or income, or both, does not provide for a cost-of-living adjustment or that the order for maintenance or child support has a provision such as a step increase that has the effect of a cost-of-living clause. The court may waive a cost-of-living adjustment in a maintenance order if the parties so agree in writing. The commissioner of human services may promulgate rules for child support adjustments under this section in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of chapter 14. Notice of this statute must comply with section 518.68, subdivision 2.

 

Subd. 2. [NOTICE.] No adjustment under this section may be made unless the order provides for it and the notice provisions of this subdivision are followed. The public authority or the obligee, if the obligee is requesting the cost-of-living adjustment, sends must send notice of the intended adjustment to the obligor at the obligor's last known address at least 20 days before the effective date of the adjustment. The notice shall must inform the obligor of the date on which the adjustment will become becomes effective and the procedures for contesting the adjustment.

 

Subd. 2a. [PROCEDURES FOR CONTESTING ADJUSTMENT.] (a) To contest cost-of-living adjustments initiated by the public authority or an obligee who has applied for or is receiving child support and maintenance collection services from the public authority, other than income withholding only services, the obligor, before the effective date of the adjustment, must:

 

(1) file a motion contesting the cost-of-living adjustment with the court administrator; and

 

(2) serve the motion by first-class mail on the public authority and the obligee.

 

The hearing shall must take place in the expedited child support process as governed by section 484.702.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7367

(b) To contest cost-of-living adjustments initiated by an obligee who is not receiving child support and maintenance collection services from the public authority, or for by an obligee who receives income withholding only services from the public authority, the obligor must, before the effective date of the adjustment:

 

(1) file a motion contesting the cost-of-living adjustment with the court administrator; and

 

(2) serve the motion by first-class mail on the obligee.

 

The hearing shall must take place in district court.

 

(c) Upon receipt of a motion contesting the cost-of-living adjustment, the cost-of-living adjustment shall must be stayed pending further order of the court.

 

(d) The court administrator shall must make available pro se motion forms for contesting a cost-of-living adjustment under this subdivision.

 

Subd. 3. [RESULT OF HEARING.] If, at a hearing pursuant to this section, the obligor establishes an insufficient cost of living or other increase in income that prevents fulfillment of the adjusted maintenance or child support obligation, the court or child support magistrate may direct that all or part of the adjustment not take effect. If, at the hearing, the obligor does not establish this insufficient increase in income, the adjustment shall must take effect as of the date it would have become effective had no hearing been requested.

 

Sec. 44. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.642, is amended to read:

 

518.642 [OVERPAYMENTS.]

 

If child support or maintenance is not assigned under section 256.741, and an obligor has overpaid a child support or maintenance obligation because of a modification or error in the amount owed, the public authority shall must:

 

(1) apply the amount of the overpayment to reduce the amount of any child support or maintenance-related arrearages or debts owed to the obligee; and

 

(2) if an overpayment exists after the reduction of any arrearage or debt, reduce the amount of the child support maintenance remitted to the obligee by an amount no greater than 20 percent of the current monthly support or maintenance obligation and remit this amount to the obligor until the overpayment is reduced to zero.

 

Sec. 45. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.646, is amended to read:

 

518.646 [NOTICE OF ORDER.]

 

Whenever these laws require If a law requires service of a court's order on an employer, union, or payor of funds, service of a verified notice of order may be made in lieu thereof of the order. The verified notice shall must contain the title of the action, the name of the court, the court file number, the date of the court order, and shall recite the operative provisions of the order.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7368

Sec. 46. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.65, is amended to read:

 

518.65 [PROPERTY; SALE, PARTITION.]

 

In order to effect a division or award of property as is provided by under section 518.58, the court may order property sold or partitioned. Personal property may be ordered sold in the manner directed by the court, and real estate may be partitioned in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes 1949, chapter 558.

 

Sec. 47. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.68, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [REQUIREMENT.] Every court order or judgment and decree that provides for child support, spousal maintenance, custody, or parenting time must contain certain notices as set out in subdivision 2. The information in the notices must be concisely stated in plain language. The notices must be in clearly legible print, but may not exceed two pages. An order or judgment and decree without the notice remains subject to all statutes. The court may waive all or part of the notice required under subdivision 2 relating to parental rights under section 518.17, subdivision 3, if it finds it is necessary to protect the welfare of a party or child section 517C.99.

 

Sec. 48. [REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.]

 

The revisor of statutes must renumber the sections in Minnesota Statutes listed in column A as indicated in column B and correct cross-references to those sections throughout Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota Rules.

 

A B

 

518.002 517A.02, subd. 5

518.003 517A.01

518.005 517A.02

518.01 517A.07

518.02 517A.08

518.03 517A.09

518.04 517A.10

518.05 517A.11

518.055 517A.12

518.06 517A.15

518.07 517A.16

518.09 517A.18

518.091 517A.19

518.10 517A.20

518.11 517A.22

518.12 517A.23

518.13 517A.24

518.131 517A.03

518.14, subd. 1 517A.04

518.145 517A.28

518.146 517A.21

518.148 517A.26

518.191 517A.27

518.195 517A.17

518.25 517A.30

518.27 517A.25

518.54, subd. 1 517A.31, subd. 1


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7369

518.54, subd. 2a 517A.31, subd. 2

518.54, subd. 2b 517A.31, subd. 3

518.54, subd. 3 517A.31, subd. 4

518.54, subd. 4 517A.31, subd. 5

518.54, subd. 5 517A.31, subd. 6

518.54, subd. 6 517A.31, subd. 7

518.54, subd. 7 517A.31, subd. 8

518.54, subd. 8 517A.31, subd. 9

518.54, subd. 9 517A.31, subd. 10

518.54, subd. 10 517A.31, subd. 11

518.54, subd. 11 517A.31, subd. 12

518.54, subd. 12 517A.31, subd. 13

518.55, subd. 1 517A.32, subd. 4

518.55, subd. 3 517A.32, subd. 5

518.552, subd. 1 517A.32, subd. 1

518.552, subd. 2 517A.32, subd. 2

518.552, subd. 3 517A.32, subd. 3

518.552, subd. 4 517A.32, subd. 6

518.552, subd. 5 517A.32, subd. 7

518.58 517A.37

518.581 517A.39

518.582 517A.40

518.63 517A.41

518.64, subd. 1 517A.34, subd. 1

518.64, subd. 2 517A.34, subd. 2

518.64, subd. 3 517A.32, subd. 8

518.641, subd. 1 517A.33, subd. 1

518.641, subd. 2 517A.33, subd. 2

518.641, subd. 2a 517A.33, subd. 3

518.641, subd. 3 517A.43, subd. 4

518.642 517A.35

518.646 517A.05

518.65 517A.38

 

Sec. 49. [REPEALER.]

 

Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 518.14, subdivision 2; 518.24; 518.55, subdivision 4; 518.62; 518.64, subdivisions 4, 4a, and 5; and 518.68, are repealed.

 

ARTICLE 3

 

CUSTODY, PARENTING TIME, AND VISITATION

GENERAL

 

Section 1. [517B.01] [DEFINITIONS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [SCOPE.] The definitions in this section apply to this chapter.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7370

Sec. 2. [517B.03] [TEMPORARY ORDERS RELATING TO CUSTODY AND PARENTING TIME.]

 

(a) A temporary order for custody or parenting time may be sought under section 517A.03.

 

(b) A party seeking a temporary custody order must submit with moving papers an affidavit setting forth facts supporting the requested order. The party must give notice and a copy of the affidavit to other parties to the proceeding, who may file opposing affidavits.

 

Sec. 3. [517B.04] [CUSTODY, PARENTING TIME, AND VISITATION NOTICES.]

 

A court order or judgment and decree concerning custody of or parenting time with a minor child must contain the notice set out in section 517C.99, subdivision 3.

 

Sec. 4. [517B.05] [ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS, AND DISBURSEMENTS.]

 

Attorney fees, costs, and disbursements must be awarded in a proceeding under this chapter as provided by section 517A.04.

 

Sec. 5. [517B.17] [CUSTODY OF CHILDREN.]

 

Subdivision 1. [CUSTODY ORDER.] Upon adjudging the nullity of a marriage, in a dissolution or legal separation proceeding, or in a child custody proceeding, the court must make a further order as it deems just and proper concerning:

 

(1) the legal custody of each minor child of the parties, which must be sole or joint; and

 

(2) their physical custody and residence.

 

Subd. 2. [STANDARD; PREFERENCE PROHIBITED.] In determining custody, the court must consider the best interests of the child and must not prefer one parent over the other solely on the basis of the sex of the parent.

 

Subd. 3. [THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD; FACTORS.] "The best interests of the child" means all relevant factors to be considered and evaluated by the court including:

 

(1) the wishes of the child's parent or parents as to custody;

 

(2) the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient age to express a preference;

 

(3) the child's primary caretaker;

 

(4) the intimacy of the relationship between each parent and the child;

 

(5) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with a parent or parents, siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child's best interests;

 

(6) the child's adjustment to home, school, and community;

 

(7) the length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7371

(8) the permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed home;

 

(9) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved; except that a disability, as defined in section 363.01, of a parent or the child is not determinative of the custody of the child, unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child;

 

(10) the capacity and disposition of the parties to give the child love, affection, and guidance, and to continue educating and raising the child in the child's culture and religion or creed, if any;

 

(11) the child's cultural background;

 

(12) the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser, if related to domestic abuse, as defined in section 518B.01, that has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual, whether or not the individual alleged to have committed domestic abuse is or ever was a family or household member of the parent;

 

(13) except in cases in which a finding of domestic abuse as defined in section 518B.01 has been made, the disposition of each parent to encourage and permit frequent and continuing contact by the other parent with the child; and

 

(14) evidence of a violation of section 609.507.

 

Subd. 4. [BEST INTERESTS DETERMINATION.] The court must make detailed findings on each of the factors in subdivision 3 and explain how the factors led to its conclusion and to the determination of the best interests of the child. In determining the best interests of a child, the court may not use one factor in subdivision 3 to the exclusion of all others. The primary caretaker factor may not be used as a presumption in determining the best interests of the child. The court shall not consider conduct of a parent that does not affect the parent's relationship to the child.

 

Sec. 6. [517B.18] [JOINT CUSTODY.]

 

Subdivision 1. [FACTORS WHEN JOINT CUSTODY IS SOUGHT.] In addition to the factors listed in section 517B.17, if either joint legal or joint physical custody is sought, the court must consider the following relevant factors:

 

(1) the ability of parents to cooperate in the rearing of their child;

 

(2) methods for resolving disputes regarding any major decision concerning the life of the child, and the parents' willingness to use those methods;

 

(3) whether it would be detrimental to the child if one parent were to have sole authority over the child's upbringing; and

 

(4) whether domestic abuse, as defined in section 518B.01, has occurred between the parents.

 

Subd. 2. [PRESUMPTIONS; FINDINGS.] (a) The court must use a rebuttable presumption that upon request of either or both parents, joint legal custody is in the best interests of the child. However, the court must use a rebuttable presumption that joint legal or physical custody is not in the best interests of the child if domestic abuse, as defined in section 518B.01, has occurred between the parents.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7372

(b) If the court awards joint legal or physical custody over the objection of a parent, the court must make detailed findings on each of the factors in this section and explain how the factors led to its determination that joint custody would be in the best interests of the child.

 

Subd. 3. [JOINT CUSTODY; SUPPORT GUIDELINES.] An award of joint legal custody is not a reason for departure from the child support guidelines in sections 517C.12 to 517C.16.

 

Sec. 7. [517B.19] [CUSTODY; ACCESS RIGHTS OF PARENTS; LIMITATIONS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [ACCESS; LIMITATIONS.] (a) Whether sole or joint legal custody is ordered, the court must grant the following rights to each of the parties, unless specific findings are made under section 517C.99, subdivision 1. Each party:

 

(1) has the right of access to, and to receive copies of, a minor child's school, medical, dental, religious training, and other important records and information;

 

(2) has the right of access to information regarding health or dental insurance available to a minor child;

 

(3) must keep the other party informed as to the name and address of the school a minor child attends;

 

(4) must notify the other party of any accident or serious illness of a minor child, the name of the health care provider, and the place of treatment; and

 

(5) has the right to reasonable access and telephone contact with a minor child.

 

(b) Each party has the right to be informed by school officials about a child's welfare, educational progress and status, and to attend school and parent-teacher conferences. The school is not required to hold a separate conference for each party.

 

(c) The court may waive any of the rights under this subdivision if it finds it is necessary to protect the welfare of a party or child.

 

Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.003, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. [CUSTODY.] Unless otherwise agreed by the parties:

 

(a) "Legal custody" means the right to determine the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training.

 

(b) "Joint legal custody" means that both parents have equal rights and responsibilities, including the right to participate in major decisions determining the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training.

 

(c) "Physical custody and residence" means the routine daily care and control and the residence of the child.

 

(d) "Joint physical custody" means that the routine daily care and control and the residence of the child is structured between the parties.

 

(e) Wherever used in this chapter, the term "Custodial parent" or "custodian" means the person who has the physical custody of the child at any particular time.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7373

(f) "Custody determination" means a court decision and court orders and instructions providing for the custody of a child, including parenting time, but does not include a decision relating to child support or any other monetary obligation of any person.

 

(g) "Custody proceeding" includes proceedings in which a custody determination is one of several issues, such as an action for dissolution, divorce, or separation, and includes proceedings involving children who are in need of protection or services, domestic abuse, and paternity.

 

Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.155, is amended to read:

 

518.155 [CUSTODY DETERMINATIONS AND PARENTING TIME JURISDICTION.]

 

Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, a court in which a proceeding for dissolution, legal separation, or child custody has been commenced shall must not issue, revise, modify or amend any order, pursuant to sections 518.131, 518.165, 518.168, 518.17, 518.175 or 518.18, which section 517B.03, 517B.08, 517B.16, 517B.21, or 517B.25, that affects the custody of a minor child or the parenting time of a parent unless the court has jurisdiction over the matter pursuant to the provisions of under chapter 518D.

 

Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.156, is amended to read:

 

518.156 [COMMENCEMENT OF CUSTODY PROCEEDING.]

 

Subdivision 1. [PROCEDURE.] In a court of this state which that has jurisdiction to decide child custody matters, a child custody proceeding is commenced by a parent:

 

(1) by filing a petition for dissolution or legal separation; or

 

(2) where if a decree of dissolution or legal separation has been entered or where none is sought, or when if paternity has been recognized under section 257.75, by filing a petition or motion seeking custody or parenting time with the child in the county where the child is permanently resident or where the child is found or where an earlier order for custody of the child has been entered.

 

Subd. 2. [REQUIRED NOTICE.] Written notice of a child custody or parenting time or visitation proceeding shall must be given to the child's parent, guardian, and custodian, who may appear and be heard and may file a responsive pleading. The court may, upon a showing of good cause, permit the intervention of other interested parties.

 

Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.157, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [IMPLEMENTATION; ADMINISTRATION.] By January 1, 1998, The chief judge of each judicial district or a designee shall must implement one or more parent education programs within the judicial district for the purpose of educating parents about the impact that divorce, the restructuring of families, and judicial proceedings have upon children and families; methods for preventing parenting time conflicts; and dispute resolution options. The chief judge of each judicial district or a designee may require that children attend a separate education program designed to deal with the impact of divorce upon children as part of the parent education program. Each parent education program must enable persons to have timely and reasonable access to education sessions.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7374

Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.157, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. [MINIMUM STANDARDS; PLAN.] The Minnesota supreme court should promulgate minimum standards for the implementation and administration of a parent education program. The chief judge of each judicial district or a designee shall must submit a plan to the Minnesota conference of chief judges for their approval that is designed to implement and administer a parent education program in the judicial district. The plan must be consistent with the minimum standards promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court.

 

Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.157, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. [ATTENDANCE.] In a proceeding under this chapter or sections 257.51 to 257.75 where custody or parenting time is contested, the parents of a minor child shall must attend an orientation and education program that meets the minimum standards promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. In all other proceedings involving custody, support, or parenting time the court may order the parents of a minor child to attend a parent education program. The program shall must provide the court with names of persons who fail to attend the parent education program as ordered by the court. Persons who are separated or contemplating involvement in a dissolution, paternity, custody, or parenting time proceeding may attend a parent education program without a court order. Participation in a parent education program must occur as early as possible. Parent education programs must offer an opportunity to participate at all phases of a pending or postdecree proceeding. Upon request of a party and a showing of good cause, the court may excuse the party from attending the program. If past or present domestic abuse, as defined in chapter 518B, is alleged, the court shall must not require the parties to attend the same parent education sessions and shall must enter an order setting forth the manner in which the parties may safely participate in the program.

 

Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.157, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5. [CONFIDENTIALITY.] Unless all parties agree in writing, statements made by a party during participation in a parent education program are inadmissible as evidence for any purpose, including impeachment. No record may be made regarding a party's participation in a parent education program, except a record of attendance at and completion of the program as required under this section. Instructors shall must not disclose information regarding an individual participant obtained as a result of participation in a parent education program. Parent education instructors may not be subpoenaed or called as witnesses in court proceedings.

 

Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.157, subdivision 6, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 6. [FEE.] Except as provided in this subdivision, each person who attends a parent education program shall must pay a fee to defray the cost of the program. A party who qualifies for waiver of filing fees under section 563.01 is exempt from paying the parent education program fee, and the court shall must waive the fee or direct its payment under section 563.01. Program providers shall implement a sliding fee scale.

 

Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.165, as amended by Laws 2003, chapter 112, article 2, section 50, is amended to read:

 

518.165 [GUARDIANS FOR MINOR CHILDREN.]

 

Subdivision 1. [PERMISSIVE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM.] In all proceedings for child custody or for dissolution or legal separation where custody or parenting time with a minor child is in issue, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem from a panel established by the court to represent the interests of the child. The guardian ad litem shall must advise the court with respect to custody, support, and parenting time.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7375

Subd. 2. [REQUIRED APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM.] The court must appoint a guardian ad litem in all proceedings for child custody or for marriage dissolution or legal separation in which custody or parenting time with a minor child is an issue, if the court has reason to believe that the minor child is a victim of domestic child abuse or neglect, as those terms are defined in sections 260C.007 and 626.556, respectively, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem shall must represent the interests of the child and advise the court with respect to custody, support, and parenting time. If the child is represented by a guardian ad litem in any other pending proceeding, the court may appoint that guardian to represent the child in the custody or parenting time proceeding. No guardian ad litem need be appointed if the alleged domestic child abuse or neglect is before the court on a juvenile dependency and neglect petition. Nothing in this subdivision requires the court to appoint a guardian ad litem in any proceeding for child custody, marriage dissolution, or legal separation in which an allegation of domestic child abuse or neglect has not been made.

 

Subd. 2a. [RESPONSIBILITIES OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM.] A guardian ad litem shall must carry out the following responsibilities:

 

(1) conduct an independent investigation to determine the facts relevant to the situation of the child and the family, which must include, unless specifically excluded by the court, reviewing relevant documents; meeting with and observing the child in the home setting and considering the child's wishes, as appropriate; and interviewing parents, caregivers, and others with knowledge relevant to the case;

 

(2) advocate for the child's best interests by participating in appropriate aspects of the case and advocating for appropriate community services when necessary;

 

(3) maintain the confidentiality of information related to a case, with the exception of sharing information as permitted by law to promote cooperative solutions that are in the best interests of the child;

 

(4) monitor the child's best interests throughout the judicial proceeding; and

 

(5) present written reports on the child's best interests that include conclusions and recommendations and the facts upon which they are based.

 

Subd. 3. [FEES.] (a) A guardian ad litem appointed under either subdivision 1 or 2 may be appointed either as a volunteer or on a fee basis. If a guardian ad litem is appointed on a fee basis, the court shall must enter an order for costs, fees, and disbursements in favor of the child's guardian ad litem. The order may be made against either or both parties, except that any part of the costs, fees, or disbursements which the court finds the parties are incapable of paying shall must be borne by the state courts. The costs of court-appointed counsel to the guardian ad litem shall must be paid by the county in which the proceeding is being held if a party is incapable of paying for them. Until the recommendations of the task force created in Laws 1999, chapter 216, article 7, section 42, are implemented, the costs of court-appointed counsel to a guardian ad litem in the Eighth Judicial District shall must be paid by the state courts if a party is incapable of paying for them. In no event may the court order that costs, fees, or disbursements be paid by a party receiving public assistance or legal assistance or by a party whose annual income falls below the poverty line as established under United States Code, title 42, section 9902(2).

 

(b) In each fiscal year, the commissioner of finance shall must deposit guardian ad litem reimbursements in the general fund and credit them to a separate account with the trial courts. The balance of this account is appropriated to the trial courts and does not cancel but is available until expended. Expenditures by the state court administrator's office from this account must be based on the amount of the guardian ad litem reimbursements received by the state from the courts in each judicial district.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7376

Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.166, is amended to read:

 

518.166 [INTERVIEWS; RECOMMENDATIONS.]

 

The court may interview the child in chambers to ascertain the child's reasonable preference as to custodian regarding with which parent the child would reside, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient age to express preference. The court shall must permit counsel to be present at the interview and shall must permit counsel to propound reasonable questions to the child either directly or through the court. The court shall must cause a record of the interview to be made and to be made part of the record in the case unless waived by the parties.

 

In contested custody proceedings, and in other custody proceedings if a parent or the child's custodian requests, the court may seek the recommendations of professional personnel whether or not they are employed on a regular basis by the court. The recommendations given shall must be in writing and shall must be made available by the court to counsel upon request. Counsel may call for cross-examination of professional personnel consulted by the court.

 

Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.167, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. [AVAILABILITY TO COUNSEL.] The court shall must mail the investigator's report to counsel and to any party not represented by counsel at least ten days before the hearing. The investigator shall must maintain and, upon request, make available to counsel and to a party not represented by counsel the investigator's file of underlying data and reports, complete texts of diagnostic reports made to the investigator pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 2, and the names and addresses of all persons whom the investigator has consulted. The investigator and any person the investigator has consulted is subject to other pretrial discovery in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure. Mediation proceedings are not subject to discovery without written consent of both parties. A party to the proceeding may call the investigator and any person whom the investigator has consulted for cross-examination at the hearing. A party may not waive the right of cross-examination before the hearing.

 

Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.167, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. [USE AT DISCOVERY; HEARING.] The investigator and any person the investigator has consulted is subject to other pretrial discovery in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure. Mediation proceedings are not subject to discovery without written consent of both parties. A party to the proceeding may cross-examine at the hearing the investigator and any person whom the investigator has consulted for cross-examination. A party may not waive the right of cross-examination before the hearing. The investigator's report may be received in evidence at the hearing.

 

Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.167, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5. [COSTS.] The court shall must order all or part of the cost of the investigation and report to be paid by either or both parties, based on their ability to pay. Any part of the cost that the court finds the parties are incapable of paying must be borne by the county welfare local social services agency or department of court services that performs the investigation. The court may not order costs under this subdivision to be paid by a party receiving public assistance or legal assistance from a qualified legal services program or by a party whose annual income falls below the poverty line under United States Code, title 42, section 9902(2).


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7377

Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.168, is amended to read:

 

518.168 [HEARINGS.]

 

(a) Custody proceedings shall must receive priority in being set for hearing.

 

(b) The court may tax as costs the payment of necessary travel and other expenses incurred by a person whose presence at the hearing the court deems necessary to determine the best interests of the child.

 

(c) The court without a jury shall must determine questions of law and fact. If it finds that a public hearing may be detrimental to the child's best interests, the court may exclude the public from a custody hearing, but may admit any person who has a direct interest in the particular case.

 

(d) If the court finds it necessary for the protection of the child's welfare that the record of an interview, report, investigation, or testimony in a custody proceeding not be kept secret disclosed, the court may make an appropriate order sealing the record.

 

Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1705, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. [PLAN ELEMENTS.] (a) A parenting plan must include the following:

 

(1) a schedule of the time each parent spends with the child;

 

(2) a designation of decision-making responsibilities regarding the child; and

 

(3) a method of dispute resolution.

 

(b) A parenting plan may include other issues and matters the parents agree to regarding the child.

 

(c) Parents voluntarily agreeing to parenting plans may substitute other terms for physical and legal custody, including designations of joint or sole custody, provided that if the terms used in the substitution are defined in the parenting plan.

 

Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1705, subdivision 6, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 6. [RESTRICTIONS ON PREPARATION AND CONTENT OF PARENTING PLAN.] (a) Dispute resolution processes other than the judicial process may not be required in the preparation of a parenting plan if a parent is alleged to have committed domestic abuse toward a parent or child who is a party to, or subject of, the matter before the court. In these cases, the court shall must consider the appointment of a guardian ad litem and a parenting plan evaluator.

 

(b) The court may not require a parenting plan that provides for joint legal custody or use of dispute resolution processes, other than the judicial process, if the court finds that section 518.179 applies, or the court finds that either parent has engaged in the following toward a parent or child who is a party to, or subject of, the matter before the court:

 

(1) acts of domestic abuse, including physical harm, bodily injury, and infliction of fear of physical harm, assault, terroristic threats, or criminal sexual conduct;

 

(2) physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; or


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7378

(3) willful abandonment that continues for an extended period of time or substantial refusal to perform parenting functions.

 

Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1705, subdivision 7, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 7. [MOVING THE CHILD TO ANOTHER STATE.] Parents may agree, but the court must not require, that in a parenting plan the factors in section 518.17 or 257.025, as applicable, will govern a decision concerning removal of a child's residence from this state, provided that if:

 

(1) both parents were represented by counsel when the parenting plan was approved; or

 

(2) the court found the parents were fully informed, the agreement was voluntary, and the parents were aware of its implications.

 

Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1705, subdivision 8, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 8. [ALLOCATION OF CERTAIN EXPENSES.] (a) Parents creating a parenting plan are subject to the requirements of the child support guidelines under section 518.551 sections 517C.12 to 517C.18.

 

(b) Parents may include in the parenting plan an allocation of expenses for the child. The allocation is an enforceable contract between the parents.

 

Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1705, subdivision 9, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 9. [MODIFICATION OF PARENTING PLANS.] (a) Parents may modify the schedule of the time each parent spends with the child or the decision-making provisions of a parenting plan by agreement. To be enforceable, modifications must be confirmed by court order. A motion to modify decision-making provisions or the time each parent spends with the child may be made only within the time limits provided by section 518.18.

 

(b) The parties may agree, but the court must not require them, to apply the best interests standard in section 518.17 or 257.025, as applicable, for deciding a motion for modification that would change the child's primary residence, provided that if:

 

(1) both parties were represented by counsel when the parenting plan was approved; or

 

(2) the court found the parties were fully informed, the agreement was voluntary, and the parties were aware of its implications.

 

(c) If the parties do not agree to apply the best interests standard, section 518.18, paragraph (d), applies.

 

Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.175, is amended to read:

 

518.175 [PARENTING TIME.]

 

Subdivision 1. [GENERAL.] (a) In all proceedings for dissolution or legal separation, subsequent to the commencement of the proceeding and continuing thereafter during the minority of the child, the court shall must, upon the request of either parent, grant such parenting time on behalf of the child and a parent as that will enable the child and the parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interests of the child.

 

(b) If the court finds, after a hearing, that parenting time with a parent is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development, the court shall must restrict parenting time with that parent as to time, place, duration, or supervision and may deny parenting time entirely, as the circumstances warrant. The court shall must consider the age of the child and the child's relationship with the parent prior to before the commencement of the proceeding.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7379

(c) A parent's failure to pay support because of the parent's inability to do so shall is not be sufficient cause for denial of parenting time.

 

(b) (d) The court may provide that a law enforcement officer or other appropriate person will accompany a party seeking to enforce or comply with parenting time.

 

(c) (e) Upon request of either party, to the extent practicable an order for parenting time must include a specific schedule for parenting time, including the frequency and duration of visitation and visitation during holidays and vacations, unless parenting time is restricted, denied, or reserved.

 

(d) (f) The court administrator shall must provide a form for a pro se motion regarding parenting time disputes, which includes must include provisions for indicating the relief requested, an affidavit in which the party may state the facts of the dispute, and a brief description of the parenting time expeditor process under section 518.1751. The form may not include a request for a change of custody. The court shall must provide instructions on serving and filing the motion.

 

Subd. 1a. [DOMESTIC ABUSE; SUPERVISED PARENTING TIME.] (a) If a parent requests supervised parenting time under subdivision 1 or 5 and an order for protection under chapter 518B or a similar law of another state is in effect against the other parent to protect the child or the parent with whom the child resides or the child, the judge or judicial officer must consider the order for protection in making a decision regarding parenting time.

 

(b) The state court administrator, in consultation with representatives of parents and other interested persons, shall must develop standards to be met by persons who are responsible for supervising parenting time. Either parent may challenge the appropriateness of an individual chosen by the court to supervise parenting time.

 

Subd. 2. [RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND PARENTS.] Upon the request of either parent, the court may inform any child of the parties, if eight years of age or older, or otherwise of an age of suitable comprehension, of the rights of the child and each parent under the order or decree or any substantial amendment thereof of it. The parent with whom the child resides shall must present the child for parenting time with the other parent, at such the times as the court directs.

 

Subd. 3. [MOVE TO ANOTHER STATE.] The parent with whom the child resides shall must not move the child's residence of the child to another state except upon order of the court or with the consent of the other parent, if the other parent has been given parenting time by the decree. If the purpose of the move is to interfere with parenting time given to the other parent by the decree, the court shall must not permit the child's residence to be moved to another state.

 

Subd. 5. [MODIFICATION OF PARENTING PLAN OR ORDER FOR PARENTING TIME.] (a) If modification would serve the best interests of the child, the court shall must modify the decision-making provisions of a parenting plan or an order granting or denying parenting time, if the modification would not change the child's primary residence. Except as provided in section 631.52, the court may not restrict parenting time unless it finds that:

 

(1) parenting time is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development; or

 

(2) the parent has chronically and unreasonably failed to comply with court-ordered parenting time.

 

(b) If a parent makes specific allegations that parenting time by the other parent places the parent or child in danger of harm, the court shall must hold a hearing at the earliest possible time to determine the need to modify the order granting parenting time. Consistent with subdivision 1a 2, the court may require a third party, including the


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7380

local social services agency, to supervise the parenting time or may restrict a parent's parenting time if necessary to protect the other parent or child from harm. If there is an existing order for protection governing the parties, the court shall must consider the use of an independent, neutral exchange location for parenting time.

 

Subd. 6. [REMEDIES.] (a) The court may provide for one or more of the following remedies for denial of or interference with court-ordered parenting time as provided under this subdivision. All parenting time orders must include notice of the provisions of this subdivision.

 

(b) If the court finds that a person parent has been deprived of court-ordered parenting time, the court shall must order the parent who has interfered caused the deprivation to allow compensatory parenting time to the other parent or the court shall must make specific findings as to why a request for compensatory parenting time is denied. If compensatory parenting time is awarded, additional parenting time must be:

 

(1) at least of the same type and duration as the deprived parenting time and, at the discretion of the court, may be in excess of or of a different type than the deprived parenting time;

 

(2) taken within one year after the deprived parenting time; and

 

(3) at a time acceptable to the parent deprived of parenting time.

 

(c) If the court finds that a party has wrongfully failed to comply with a parenting time order or a binding agreement or decision under section 518.1751, the court may:

 

(1) impose a civil penalty of up to $500 on the party;

 

(2) require the party to post a bond with the court for a specified period of time to secure the party's compliance;

 

(3) award reasonable attorney's fees and costs;

 

(4) require the party who violated the parenting time order or binding agreement or decision of the parenting time expeditor to reimburse the other party for costs incurred as a result of the violation of the order or, agreement, or decision; or

 

(5) award any other remedy that the court finds to be in the best interests of the children involved.

 

A civil penalty imposed under this paragraph must be deposited in the county general fund and must be used to fund the costs of a parenting time expeditor program in a county with this program. In other counties, the civil penalty must be deposited in the state general fund.

 

(d) If the court finds that a party has been denied parenting time and has incurred expenses in connection with the denied parenting time, the court may require the party who denied parenting time to post a bond in favor of the other party in the amount of prepaid expenses associated with upcoming planned parenting time.

 

(e) Proof of an unwarranted denial of or interference with duly established parenting time may constitute contempt of court and may be sufficient cause for reversal of custody.

 

Subd. 8. [ADDITIONAL PARENTING TIME FOR CHILD CARE PARENT.] The court may allow additional parenting time to a parent to provide child care while the other parent is working if this arrangement is reasonable and in the best interests of the child, as defined in section 518.17, subdivision 1. In addition, the court shall must consider:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7381

(1) the ability of the parents to cooperate;

 

(2) methods for resolving disputes regarding the care of the child, and the parents' willingness to use those methods; and

 

(3) whether domestic abuse, as defined in section 518B.01, has occurred between the parties.

 

Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1751, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 1b. [PURPOSE; DEFINITIONS.] (a) The purpose of a parenting time expeditor is to resolve parenting time disputes by enforcing, interpreting, clarifying, and addressing circumstances not specifically addressed by an existing parenting time order and, if appropriate, to make a determination as to whether the existing parenting time order has been violated. A parenting time expeditor may be appointed to resolve a onetime parenting time dispute or to provide ongoing parenting time dispute resolution services. A parenting time expeditor must attempt to resolve a parenting time dispute by facilitating negotiations between the parties to promote settlement. If it becomes apparent that the dispute cannot be resolved by an agreement of the parties, the parenting time expeditor must make a decision resolving the dispute.

 

(b) For purposes of this section, "parenting time dispute" means a disagreement among parties about parenting time with a child, including a dispute about an anticipated denial of future scheduled parenting time. "Parenting time dispute" includes a claim by a parent that the other parent is not spending time with a child as well as a claim by a parent that the other parent is denying or interfering with parenting time.

 

(c) A "parenting time expeditor" is a neutral person authorized to use a mediation-arbitration process to resolve parenting time disputes. A parenting time expeditor shall attempt to resolve a parenting time dispute by facilitating negotiations between the parties to promote settlement and, if it becomes apparent that the dispute cannot be resolved by an agreement of the parties, the parenting time expeditor shall make a decision resolving the dispute.

 

Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1751, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. [APPOINTMENT.] (a) The parties may stipulate to the appointment of a parenting time expeditor or a team of two expeditors without appearing in court by submitting. The parties may submit to the court a written agreement identifying the names of the individuals to be appointed by the court; the nature of the dispute; the responsibilities of the parenting time expeditor, including whether the expeditor is appointed to resolve a specific issue or on an ongoing basis; the term of the appointment; and the apportionment of fees and costs. The court shall must review the agreement of the parties.

 

(b) If the parties cannot agree on a parenting time expeditor, the court shall must provide to the parties them with a copy of the court administrator's roster of parenting time expeditors and require the parties to exchange the names of three potential parenting time expeditors by a specific date. If after exchanging names the parties are unable to agree upon a parenting time expeditor, the court shall must select the parenting time expeditor and, in its discretion, may appoint one expeditor or a team of two expeditors. In the selection process the court must give consideration to the financial circumstances of the parties and the fees of those being considered as parenting time expeditors. Preference must be given to persons who agree to volunteer their services or who will charge a variable fee for services based on the ability of the parties to pay for them.

 

(c) An order appointing a parenting time expeditor must identify the name of the individual to be appointed, the nature of the dispute, the responsibilities of the expeditor including whether the expeditor is appointed to resolve a specific issue or on an ongoing basis, the term of the appointment, the apportionment of fees, and notice that if the parties are unable to reach an agreement with the expeditor's assistance of the expeditor, the expeditor is authorized to make a decision resolving the dispute which is binding upon the parties unless modified or vacated by the court.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7382

Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1751, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2a. [FEES.] Prior to Before appointing the parenting time expeditor, the court shall must give the parties notice that the expeditor's fees of the expeditor will be apportioned among the parties. In its order appointing the expeditor, the court shall must apportion the expeditor's fees of the expeditor among the parties, with each party bearing the portion of fees that the court determines is just and equitable under the circumstances. If a party files a pro se motion regarding a parenting time dispute and there is not a an existing court order that provides for apportionment of apportioning the fees of an expeditor, the court administrator may require the party requesting the appointment of an expeditor to pay the expeditor's fees of the expeditor in advance. Neither party may be required to submit a dispute to a visitation an expeditor if the party cannot afford to pay for the fees of an expeditor and an affordable expeditor is not available, unless the other party agrees to pay the fees. After fees are incurred, a party may by motion request that the fees be reapportioned on equitable grounds. The court may consider the resources of the parties, the nature of the dispute, and whether a party acted in bad faith. The court may consider information from the expeditor in determining bad faith.

 

Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1751, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2b. [ROSTER OF PARENTING TIME EXPEDITORS.] Each The court administrator shall must maintain and make available to judicial officers and the public and judicial officers a roster of individuals available to serve as parenting time expeditors, including. The roster must include each individual's name, address, telephone number, and fee charged, if any. A court administrator shall must not place on the roster the name of an individual who has not completed the training required in subdivision 2c. If the use of a parenting time an expeditor is initiated by stipulation of the parties, the parties may agree upon a person to serve as an expeditor even if that person has not completed the training described in subdivision 2c. The court may appoint a person to serve as an expeditor even if the a person who is not on the court administrator's roster, but may not appoint a person who has not completed the training described in subdivision 2c, unless so stipulated by the parties. To maintain one's listing on a court administrator's roster of parenting time expeditors, an individual shall must annually submit to the court administrator proof of completion of continuing education requirements.

 

Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1751, subdivision 2c, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2c. [TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS.] To qualify for listing on a court administrator's roster of parenting time expeditors, an individual shall must complete a minimum of 40 hours of family mediation training that has been certified by the Minnesota supreme court, which. The training must include certified training in domestic abuse issues as required under Rule 114 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice for the District Courts. To maintain one's listing remain listed on a court administrator's roster of parenting time expeditors, an individual shall must annually attend three hours of continuing education about alternative dispute resolution subjects.

 

Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1751, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. [AGREEMENT OR DECISION.] (a) Within five days of notice of the appointment, or within five days of notice of a subsequent parenting time dispute between the same parties, the parenting time expeditor shall must meet with the parties together or separately and shall make a diligent effort to facilitate an agreement to resolve the dispute. If a parenting time dispute requires immediate resolution, the parenting time expeditor may confer with the parties through a telephone conference or similar means. An expeditor may make a decision without conferring with a party if the expeditor made a good faith effort to confer with the party, but the party chose not to participate in resolution of the dispute.

 

(b) If the parties do not reach an agreement, the expeditor shall must make a decision resolving the dispute as soon as possible, but not later than five days after receiving all information necessary to make a decision and after


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7383

the final meeting or conference with the parties. The expeditor is authorized to award compensatory parenting time under section 518.175, subdivision 6, and may recommend to the court that the noncomplying party pay attorney's fees, court costs, and other costs under section 518.175, subdivision 6, paragraph (d), if the parenting time order has been violated. The expeditor shall not lose retains the authority to make a decision if circumstances beyond the expeditor's control make it impracticable to meet the five-day timelines.

 

(c) Unless the parties mutually agree, the parenting time expeditor shall must not make a decision that is inconsistent with an existing parenting time order, but may make decisions interpreting or clarifying a parenting time order, including the development of a specific schedule when the existing court order grants "reasonable parenting time."

 

(d) The expeditor shall must put an agreement or decision in writing and provide a copy to the parties. The expeditor may include or omit reasons for the agreement or decision. An agreement of the parties or a decision of the expeditor is binding on the parties unless vacated or modified by the court. If a party does not comply with an agreement of the parties or a decision of the expeditor, any party may bring a motion with the court and shall must attach a copy of the parties' written agreement or the decision of the expeditor. The court may enforce, modify, or vacate the agreement of the parties or the decision of the expeditor.

 

Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.1752, is amended to read:

 

518.1752 [GRANDPARENT AND OTHERS; VISITATION.]

 

In all proceedings During a proceeding for dissolution or legal separation, after the commencement of the proceeding or at any time after completion of the proceedings, and continuing during the child's minority of the child, the court may make an order granting visitation rights to grandparents under and other individuals as provided by section 257C.08, subdivision 2.

 

Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.176, is amended to read:

 

518.176 [JUDICIAL SUPERVISION.]

 

Subdivision 1. [LIMITS ON PARENT'S AUTHORITY; HEARING.] Except as otherwise agreed by the parties in writing at the time of the custody order, (a) The parent with whom the child resides may determine the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training, unless:

 

(1) otherwise agreed by the parties in writing at the time of the custody order; or

 

(2) upon motion by the other parent, the court after hearing, finds, upon motion by the other parent, that in the absence of a specific limitation of the authority of the parent with whom the child resides, the child's physical or emotional health is likely to be endangered or the child's emotional development impaired.

 

Subd. 2. (b) If both parents or all contestants agree to the order, or if the court finds that in the absence of the order the child's physical or emotional health is likely to be endangered or the child's emotional development impaired, the court may order the local social services agency or the department of court services to exercise continuing supervision over the case under guidelines established by the court to assure that the custodial or parenting time terms of the decree are carried out.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7384

Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.177, is amended to read:

 

518.177 [NOTIFICATION REGARDING DEPRIVATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS LAW.]

 

Every A court order and judgment and decree concerning custody of or parenting time or visitation with a minor child shall must contain the notice set out in section 518.68, subdivision 2.

 

Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.178, is amended to read:

 

518.178 [PARENTING TIME AND SUPPORT REVIEW HEARING.]

 

Upon motion of either party, the court shall must conduct a hearing to review compliance with the parenting time and child support provisions set forth in a decree of dissolution or legal separation or an order that establishes child custody, parenting time, and support rights and obligations of parents. The state court administrator shall must prepare, and each court administrator shall must make available, simplified pro se forms for reviewing parenting time and child support disputes. The court may impose any parenting time enforcement remedy available under sections 518.175 and 518.1751 this section or section 517B.26, and any support enforcement remedy available under section 518.551.

 

Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.179, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [SEEKING CUSTODY OR PARENTING TIME.] (a) Notwithstanding any contrary provision in section 518.17 or 518.175, if a person seeking child custody or parenting time who has been convicted of a crime described in subdivision 2, the person seeking custody or parenting time has the burden to prove that custody or parenting time by that person is in the best interests of the child if:

 

(1) the conviction occurred within the preceding five years;

 

(2) the person is currently incarcerated, on probation, or under supervised release for the offense; or

 

(3) the victim of the crime was a family or household member as defined in section 518B.01, subdivision 2.

 

(b) If this section applies, the court may not grant custody or parenting time to the person unless it finds that the custody or parenting time is in the best interests of the child. If the victim of the crime was a family or household member, the standard of proof is clear and convincing evidence. A guardian ad litem must be appointed in any case where this section applies.

 

Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.18, is amended to read:

 

518.18 [MODIFICATION OF ORDER.]

 

(a) Unless agreed to in writing by the parties, no motion to modify a custody order or parenting plan may be made earlier than one year after the date of the entry of a decree of dissolution or legal separation containing a provision dealing with custody, except in accordance with paragraph (c).

 

(b) If a motion for modification has been heard, whether or not it was granted, unless agreed to in writing by the parties no subsequent motion may be filed within two years after disposition of the prior motion on its merits, except:

 

(1) if otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties; or


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7385

(2) in accordance with paragraph (c).

 

(c) The time limitations prescribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) shall do not prohibit a motion to modify a custody order or parenting plan if the court finds that there is persistent and willful denial or interference with parenting time, or has reason to believe that the child's present environment may endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development.

 

(d) If the A court that has jurisdiction to determine child custody matters, the court shall must not modify a prior custody order or a parenting plan provision which that specifies the child's primary residence unless it finds, upon the basis of facts, including unwarranted denial of, or interference with, a duly established parenting time schedule, that have arisen since the prior order or that were unknown to the court at the time of the prior order, that a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or the parties and that the modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. The court must make its findings upon the basis of facts, including unwarranted denial of, or interference with, a duly established parenting time schedule, that have arisen since the prior order or that were unknown to the court at the time of the prior order. In applying these standards the court shall must retain the custody arrangement or the parenting plan provision specifying the child's primary residence that was established by the prior order unless:

 

(i) (1) the court finds that a change in the custody arrangement or primary residence is in the best interests of the child and the parties previously agreed, in a writing approved by a court, to apply the best interests standard in section 518.17 or 257.025, as applicable; and, with respect to agreements approved by a court on or after April 28, 2000, both parties were represented by counsel when the agreement was approved or the court found the parties were fully informed, the agreement was voluntary, and the parties were aware of its implications;

 

(ii) (2) both parties agree to the modification;

 

(iii) (3) the child has been integrated into the family of the petitioner with the consent of the other party; or

 

(iv) (4) the child's present environment endangers the child's physical or emotional health or impairs the child's emotional development, and the harm likely to be caused by a change of environment is outweighed by the advantage of a change to the child.

 

In addition, (e) A court may modify a custody order or parenting plan under section 631.52.

 

(e) (f) In deciding whether to modify a prior joint custody order, the court shall must apply the standards set forth in paragraph (d) unless:

 

(1) the parties agree in writing to the application of a different standard,; or

 

(2) the party seeking the modification is asking the court for permission to move the residence of the child to another state.

 

(f) If a parent has been granted sole physical custody of a minor and the child subsequently lives with the other parent, and temporary sole physical custody has been approved by the court or by a court-appointed referee,

 

(g) The court may suspend the obligor's child support obligation pending the a final custody determination if:

 

(1) the obligee has been granted sole physical custody of a child;

 

(2) the child subsequently lives with the obligor; and


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7386

(3) a temporary sole custody order has been approved by the court or a court-approved referee.

 

The court's A court order denying the suspension of child support under this paragraph must include a written explanation of the reasons why continuation of the child support obligation would be in the best interests of the child.

 

(h) A party seeking modification of a custody order must submit with moving papers an affidavit setting forth facts supporting the requested modification. The party must give notice and a copy of the affidavit to other parties to the proceeding, who may file opposing affidavits.

 

Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.612, is amended to read:

 

518.612 [INDEPENDENCE OF PROVISIONS OF DECREE OR TEMPORARY ORDER.]

 

Failure by a party to make support payments is not a defense to:

 

(1) interference with parenting time; or

 

(2) without the permission of the court or the other parent, removing a child from this state.

 

Interference with parenting time or taking a child from this state without permission of the court or the other parent is not a defense to nonpayment of support. If a party fails to make support payments, interferes with parenting time, or removes a child from the state without permission of the court or the other parent, the other party may petition the court for an appropriate order.

 

(a) An obligor may not assert as a defense to failure to pay child support that the obligee interfered with parenting time or removed the child from the state without permission of the obligor or the court.

 

(b) An obligee may not assert as a defense to interference with parenting time or removing the child from the state without permission of the obligor or the court, that the obligor failed to pay child support.

 

(c) A party may petition the court for an appropriate order if the other party:

 

(1) fails to make support payments;

 

(2) interferes with parenting time; or

 

(3) removes a child from this state without permission of the court or the other parent.

 

Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518.619, is amended to read:

 

518.619 [CUSTODY OR VISITATION PARENTING TIME; MEDIATION SERVICES.]

 

Subdivision 1. [MEDIATION PROCEEDING.] Except as provided in subdivision 2, if it appears on the face of the petition or other application for an order or modification of an order for the child custody of a child that custody or parenting time is contested, or that any issue pertinent to a custody or parenting time determination, including parenting time rights, is unresolved, the matter may be set for mediation of the contested issue prior to before, concurrent with, or subsequent to the after setting of the matter for hearing. The purpose of the mediation proceeding is to reduce acrimony which that may exist between the parties and to develop an agreement that is supportive of the child's best interests. The mediator shall must use best efforts to effect a settlement of the custody or parenting time dispute, but shall have has no coercive authority.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7387

Subd. 2. [EXCEPTION.] If the court determines that there is probable cause that one of the parties, or a child of a party, has been physically or sexually abused by the other a party, the court shall must not require or refer the parties to mediation or any other process that requires parties to meet and confer without counsel, if any, present.

 

Subd. 3. [MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT.] In order to participate in a custody mediation, a mediator must be appointed by the family court. A mediator must be a member of the professional staff of a family court, probation department, mental health services agency, or a private mediation service. The mediator must be on a list of mediators approved by the court having jurisdiction of the matter, unless the parties stipulate to a mediator not on the list.

 

Subd. 4. [MEDIATOR QUALIFICATIONS.] A mediator who performs mediation in contested child custody matters shall must meet the following minimum qualifications:

 

(a) (1) knowledge of the court system and the procedures used in contested child custody matters;

 

(b) (2) knowledge of other resources in the community to which the parties to contested child custody matters can be referred for assistance;

 

(c) (3) knowledge of child development, clinical issues relating to children, the effects of marriage dissolution on children, and child custody research; and

 

(d) (4) a minimum of 40 hours of certified mediation training.

 

Subd. 5. [RECORDS; PRIVATE DATA.] Mediation proceedings shall must be conducted in private. All records of a mediation proceeding shall be are private and not available as evidence in an action for marriage dissolution and related proceedings on any issue in controversy in the dissolution.

 

Subd. 6. [MEDIATOR RECOMMENDATIONS.] When the parties have not reached agreement as a result of the mediation proceeding, the mediator may recommend to the court that an investigation be conducted under section 518.167, or that other action be taken to assist the parties to resolve the controversy before a hearing on the issues. The mediator may not conduct the investigation or evaluation unless: (1) the parties agree in a writing, executed after the termination of mediation, that the mediator may conduct the investigation or evaluation, or (2) there is no other person reasonably available to conduct the investigation or evaluation. The mediator may recommend that mutual restraining orders be issued in appropriate cases, pending determination of the controversy, to protect the well-being of the children involved in the controversy.

 

Subd. 7. [MEDIATION AGREEMENT.] An agreement reached by the parties as a result of mediation shall must be discussed by the parties with their attorneys, if any, and. The approved agreement may then be included in the marital dissolution decree or other stipulation submitted to the court. An agreement reached by the parties as a result of mediation may not be presented to the court nor made enforceable unless the parties and their counsel, if any, consent to its presentation to the court, and the court adopts the agreement.

 

Subd. 8. [RULES.] Each court shall must adopt rules to implement this section, and shall must compile and maintain a list of mediators.

 

Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 519.11, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. [ANTENUPTIAL CONTRACT.] A man and woman of legal age may enter into an antenuptial contract or settlement prior to solemnization of marriage which shall be valid and enforceable if (a) there is a full and fair disclosure of the earnings and property of each party, and (b) the parties have had an opportunity to consult with legal counsel of their own choice. An antenuptial contract or settlement made in conformity with this section


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7388

may determine what rights each party has in the nonmarital property, defined in section 518.54, subdivision 5, clauses (a) (1) to (d) (4), upon dissolution of marriage, legal separation or after its termination by death and may bar each other of all rights in the respective estates not so secured to them by their agreement. This section shall not be construed to make invalid or unenforceable any antenuptial agreement or settlement made and executed in conformity with this section because the agreement or settlement covers or includes marital property, if the agreement or settlement would be valid and enforceable without regard to this section.

 

Sec. 43. [REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.]

 

The revisor of statutes must renumber the sections in Minnesota Statutes listed in column A as indicated in column B and correct cross-references to those sections throughout Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota Rules.

 

A B

 

518.003, subd. 2 517B.01, subd. 5

518.003, subd. 3 517B.01, subd. 2

518.003, subd. 4 517B.01, subd. 3

518.003, subd. 5 517B.01, subd. 4

518.155 517B.02

518.156 517B.13

518.157 517B.06

518.165, subd. 1 517B.08, subd. 1

518.165, subd. 2 518B.08, subd. 2

518.165, subd. 2a 517B.08, subd. 3

518.165, subd. 3 517B.08, subd. 4

518.166 517B.14

518.167 517B.15

518.168 517B.16

518.1705 517B.28

518.175, subd. 1 517B.25, subd. 1

518.175, subd. 1a 517B.25, subd. 2

518.175, subd. 2 517B.25, subd. 3

518.175, subd. 3 517B.25, subd. 4

518.175, subd. 5 517B.25, subd. 6

518.175, subd. 6 517B.25, subd. 7

518.175, subd. 8 517B.25, subd. 8

518.1751, subd. 1 517B.26, subd. 1

518.1751, subd. 1a 517B.26, subd. 3

518.1751, subd. 1b 517B.26, subd. 2

518.1751, subd. 2 517B.26, subd. 6

518.1751, subd. 2a 517B.26, subd. 7

518.1751, subd. 2b 517B.26, subd. 4

518.1751, subd. 2c 517B.26, subd. 5

518.1751, subd. 3 517B.26, subd. 8

518.1751, subd. 4 517B.26, subd. 13

518.1751, subd. 4a 517B.26, subd. 9

518.1751 subd. 5 517B.26, subd. 10

518.1751, subd. 5a 517B.26, subd. 11

518.1751, subd. 6 517B.26, subd. 12

518.1752 517B.30

518.176 517B.20


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7389

518.177 517B.04 para. (b)

518.178 517B.25, subd. 5

518.179 517B.09

518.18 517B.21

518.183 517B.27

518.612 517B.10

518.619 517B.07

 

Sec. 44. [REPEALER.]

 

Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 518.17; 518.1752; and 518.185, are repealed.

 

ARTICLE 4

 

CHILD SUPPORT

 

Section 1. [517C.01] [TITLE.]

 

This chapter may be cited as the "Minnesota Child Support Act."

 

Sec. 2. [517C.02] [DEFINITIONS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [SCOPE.] The definitions in this section apply to this chapter.

 

Subd. 2. [ARREARS.] "Arrears" means amounts owed under a support order that are past due. Arrears include:

 

(1) child support;

 

(2) the entire amount of court-ordered past support and pregnancy and confinement expenses if:

 

(i) the order does not contain repayment terms; or

 

(ii) the order contains repayment terms and the obligor fails to comply with the repayment terms; and

 

(3) attorney fees and any other collection costs addressed in a support order under section 517C.84.

 

Subd. 3. [BASIC SUPPORT.] "Basic support" means the dollar amount ordered for a child's housing, food, clothing, transportation, and education costs, and other expenses relating to the child's care. Basic support does not include monetary contributions for a child's private school tuition, child care expenses, and medical and dental expenses.

 

Subd. 4. [BUSINESS DAY.] "Business day" means a day on which state offices are open for regular business.

 

Subd. 5. [CHILD.] "Child" means an individual under 18 years of age, an individual under age 20 who is still attending secondary school, or an individual who, by reason of physical or mental condition, is incapable of self-support.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7390

Subd. 6. [CHILD SUPPORT.] "Child support" means an amount for basic support, child care support, and medical support pursuant to:

 

(1) an award in a dissolution, legal separation, annulment, or parentage proceeding for the care, support, and education of a child of the marriage or of the parties to the proceeding;

 

(2) a contribution by parents ordered under section 256.87; or

 

(3) support ordered under chapter 518B or 518C.

 

Subd. 7. [DEPOSIT ACCOUNT.] "Deposit account" means funds deposited with a financial institution in the form of a savings account, checking account, NOW account, or demand deposit account.

 

Subd. 8. [FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.] "Financial institution" means a savings association, bank, trust company, credit union, industrial loan and thrift company, bank and trust company, or savings association, and includes a branch or detached facility of a financial institution.

 

Subd. 9. [OBLIGEE.] "Obligee" means a person to whom payments for child support are owed.

 

Subd. 10. [OBLIGOR.] "Obligor" means a person obligated to pay child support. A person who is designated as the sole physical custodian of a child is presumed not to be an obligor for purposes of calculating current support unless the court makes specific written findings to overcome this presumption. For purposes of ordering medical support under section 517C.17, a custodial parent may be an obligor subject to income withholding under section 517C.17; a cost-of-living adjustment under section 517C.31; and a payment agreement under section 517C.71.

 

Subd. 11. [PAYMENT.] "Payment" means the payment of child support and related payments required by order of a tribunal, voluntary support, or statutory fees.

 

Subd. 12. [PAYOR OF FUNDS.] "Payor of funds" means a person or entity that provides funds to an obligor, including an employer as defined under chapter 24 of the Internal Revenue Code, section 3401(d), an independent contractor, payor of workers' compensation benefits or unemployment insurance benefits, or a financial institution as defined in section 13B.06.

 

Subd. 13. [PUBLIC AUTHORITY.] "Public authority" means the local unit of government, acting on behalf of the state, that is responsible for child support enforcement or the child support enforcement division of the Department of Human Services.

 

Subd. 14. [SUPPORT ORDER.] (a) "Support order" means a judgment, decree, or order, whether temporary, final, or subject to modification, issued by a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction that:

 

(1) provides for the support of a child, including a child who has attained the age of majority under the law of the issuing state, or a child and the parent with whom the child is living;

 

(2) provides for basic support, child care, medical support including expenses for confinement and pregnancy, arrears, or reimbursement; and

 

(3) may include related costs and fees, interest and penalties, income withholding, and other relief.

 

(b) The definition in paragraph (a) applies to orders issued under this chapter and chapters 256, 257, and 518C.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7391

Subd. 15. [TRIBUNAL.] "Tribunal" has the meaning given in section 518C.101.

 

Subd. 16. [UNCLAIMED SUPPORT FUNDS.] "Unclaimed support funds" means any support payments collected by the public authority from the obligor, which have not been disbursed to the obligee or public authority.

 

Subd. 17. [IV-D CASE.] "IV-D case" means a case where a party assigns rights to child support to the state because the party receives public assistance, as defined in section 256.741, or applies for child support services under title IV-D of the Social Security Act, United States Code, title 42, section 654(4).

 

Sec. 3. [517C.04] [CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [ORDER.] (a) Upon dissolution of marriage, legal separation, annulment, establishment of paternity, or when otherwise required by statute, the court must order child support as provided by this chapter.

 

(b) Nothing contained in this chapter limits the power of the court to make appropriate, adequate orders for the support and education of a child of the parties to a dissolution, legal separation, or annulment action if the dissolution, legal separation, or annulment is denied.

 

Subd. 2. [PROVISIONS.] Child support orders must provide for general child rearing costs or basic support and must also specifically address child care costs and medical care, providing for those costs pursuant to this chapter.

 

Subd. 3. [AGREEMENTS.] If the parties stipulate or agree to a child support order, the court must review the agreement to ensure it serves the best interests of the child. The Minnesota Supreme Court may promulgate rules regarding the review of stipulations and agreements. The court may refuse to accept or may alter an agreement that does not conform with the requirements of this chapter or that is otherwise not in the best interests of the child.

 

Subd. 4. [SPECIFIC DOLLAR AMOUNT.] (a) The court must order child support in a specific dollar amount.

 

(b) The court may order an obligor to pay child support in the form of a percentage share of the obligor's net bonuses, commissions, or other forms of compensation, in addition to, or if the obligor receives no base pay, in lieu of an order for a specific dollar amount.

 

Subd. 5. [PREFERENCE FOR MONTHLY PAYMENT.] There is a presumption in favor of ordering child support in an amount that reflects an obligor's monthly obligation.

 

Subd. 6. [PREFERENCE FOR STATIC PAYMENT.] There is a presumption in favor of ordering child support so that an obligor makes the same monthly payments throughout the year, as opposed to payment amounts that fluctuate by season or month. If the obligor is seasonally employed, it is generally the obligor's responsibility to budget income accordingly.

 

Subd. 7. [DEPARTURE.] The court may depart from a presumption in subdivision 5 or 6 if:

 

(1) all parties agree; or

 

(2) the presumption would impose an extreme hardship on the obligor and would not be in the best interests of the child.

 

Subd. 8. [ACCOUNTING FOR CHILD SUPPORT BY OBLIGEE.] (a) Upon an obligor's motion, a court may order an obligee to account for the use or disposition of child support received. The motion must assert the specific allegations of abuse or misapplication of child support received and that a child's needs are not being met. If the


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7392

court orders a hearing, the court may order an accounting only if the obligor establishes: (1) the specific allegations of abuse or misapplication of child support received; (2) that the child's needs are not being met; and (3) that there is no record or history of domestic abuse, harassment, or violence between the parties.

 

(b) If the court orders an accounting under paragraph (a), the obligee must provide documentation that breaks down monthly expenditures of child support received into the following categories:

 

(1) housing and utilities;

 

(2) food;

 

(3) transportation;

 

(4) clothing;

 

(5) health care;

 

(6) child care and education; and

 

(7) miscellaneous.

 

An obligee may account for expenditures on housing, utilities, food, and transportation that are attributable to multiple household members on a per capita basis.

 

(c) If the court finds that an obligee does not make the accounting required under paragraph (b) or the obligee does not spend the entire child support payment on behalf of the child, the court may:

 

(1) hold the obligee in contempt of court pursuant to this chapter, Minnesota Statutes, chapter 588, and the Minnesota rules of court;

 

(2) reduce or eliminate the obligor's child support obligation;

 

(3) order the obligee to make future expenditures on behalf of the child, whether in whole or in part, in a manner that documents the transaction; or

 

(4) make any other appropriate order to ensure that the child's needs are met.

 

(d) If the court determines that an obligor's motion under this section is brought in bad faith, the court may award reasonable attorney fees to the obligee.

 

Subd. 9. [CHILD SUPPORT TO BE DISTINGUISHED FROM MAINTENANCE.] In a judgment of dissolution or legal separation, the court must clearly distinguish between payments ordered for maintenance and payments ordered for child support. An award of payments from future income or earnings of the parent with whom the child resides is presumed to be maintenance and an award of payments from the future income or earnings of the other parent is presumed to be child support, unless otherwise designated by the court.

 

Subd. 10. [OTHER CUSTODIANS.] If a child resides with a person other than a parent and the court approves of the custody arrangement, the court may order child support payments to be made to the custodian regardless of whether the person has legal custody.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7393

Subd. 11. [EITHER PARENT LIABLE; MARITAL MISCONDUCT IRRELEVANT.] The court may order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child to pay an amount reasonable or necessary for the child's support, without regard to marital misconduct.

 

Sec. 4. [517C.05] [TEMPORARY ORDERS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [MOTION; SCOPE.] In a child support proceeding a party may, by motion, request that the court grant a temporary order pending the final disposition of the proceeding for temporary child support, costs, and reasonable attorney fees. Additionally, to facilitate the just and speedy disposition of the proceeding, the court may require a party to perform or refrain from performing additional acts.

 

Subd. 2. [DURATION.] A temporary order continues in full force and effect until:

 

(1) it is amended;

 

(2) it is vacated;

 

(3) the main action is dismissed; or

 

(4) a final decree of dissolution, legal separation, or other final order is entered.

 

Subd. 3. [FACTORS.] The court must consider the factors set forth in this chapter in making temporary orders.

 

Subd. 4. [EVIDENCE.] Temporary orders must be made solely on the basis of affidavits and argument of counsel unless:

 

(1) a party makes a timely motion or responsive motion to hear the matter on oral testimony before the court; or

 

(2) the court, in its discretion, orders the taking of oral testimony.

 

Subd. 5. [LIMITED EFFECT.] A temporary order does not prejudice the rights of the parties or the child that are to be adjudicated at subsequent hearings in the proceeding.

 

Subd. 6. [REVOCATION; MODIFICATION.] A temporary order may be revoked or modified by the court before the final disposition of the proceeding upon the same grounds and subject to the same requirements as the initial granting of the order.

 

Sec. 5. [517C.06] [DETERMINATION OF CONTROLLING ORDER.]

 

The public authority or a party may request the court to determine a controlling order when more than one order involving the same obligor and child exists.

 

Sec. 6. [517C.07] [ATTORNEY FEES; COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS.]

 

Subdivision 1. [GENERAL.] (a) Except as provided in section 517C.84, in a proceeding under this chapter, the court must award attorney fees, costs, and disbursements in an amount necessary to enable a party to carry on or contest the proceeding if:

 

(1) the fees are necessary for the good-faith assertion of the party's rights in the proceeding and will not contribute unnecessarily to the length and expense of the proceeding;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7394

(2) the party from whom fees, costs, and disbursements are sought has the means to pay them; and

 

(3) the party to whom fees, costs, and disbursements are awarded does not have the means to pay them.

 

(b) Fees, costs, and disbursements may be awarded at any point during or after a proceeding under this chapter, including if a proceeding is dismissed or abandoned.

 

(c) The court may assess costs and disbursements against either party.

 

Subd. 2. [UNREASONABLE ACTIONS.] The court may, in its discretion, assess additional fees, costs, and disbursements against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding.

 

Subd. 3. [COLLECTION.] The court may authorize the collection of money awarded by execution, or out of property sequestered, or in any other manner within the power of the court. An award of attorney fees survives the proceeding. If the award is not paid by the party directed to pay it, the award may be enforced as provided by this subdivision or by a separate civil action brought in the attorney's own name.

 

Sec. 7. [517C.10] [EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DOCUMENTATION.] (a) The parties must timely serve and file documentation of earnings and income. When there is a prehearing conference, the court must receive the documentation at least ten days before the prehearing conference.

 

(b) Documentation of earnings and income includes, but is not limited to, pay stubs for the most recent three months, employer statements, or statement of receipts and expenses if self-employed. Documentation of earnings and income also includes copies of each parent's most recent federal tax returns, W-2 forms, 1099 forms, unemployment insurance benefits statements, workers' compensation statements, and all other documents evidencing the receipt of income that provide verification of income over a longer period.

 

Subd. 2. [EXCHANGE OF TAX RETURNS.] At any time after a party commences an action seeking child support or when a child support order is in effect, a party or the public authority may require the other party to give them a copy of the other party's most recent federal tax returns that were filed with the Internal Revenue Service. The party must provide a copy of the tax returns within 30 days of receiving the request unless the request is not made in good faith. A party may not make a request under this subdivision more than once every two years, in the absence of good cause.

 

Subd. 3. [NOTICE OF ADDRESS OR RESIDENCE CHANGE.] An obligor must notify other parties of a change of address or residence within 60 days of the address or residence change.

 

Subd. 4. [NOTICE TO PUBLIC AUTHORITY; PUBLIC ASSISTANCE.] The petitioner must notify the public authority of all proceedings for dissolution, legal separation, determination of parentage, or for the custody of a child, if either party is receiving public assistance or applies for it subsequent to the commencement of the proceeding. The notice must contain the full names of the parties to the proceeding, their social security account numbers, and their birth dates.

 

Subd. 5. [FAILURE OF NOTICE.] If the court in a dissolution, legal separation, or determination of parentage proceeding, finds before issuing the order for judgment and decree, that notification has not been given to the public authority, the court must set child support according to the guidelines in this chapter. In those proceedings in which no notification has been made pursuant to this section and in which the public authority determines that the judgment is lower than the child support required by the guidelines in this chapter, it must move the court for a redetermination of the support payments ordered so that the support payments comply with the guidelines.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7395

Sec. 8. [517C.11] [PRIVACY PROTECTION; PERSONAL PROTECTION.]

 

Subdivision 1. [SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS; TAX RETURNS.] The social security numbers and tax returns required under this chapter are not accessible to the public, except that they must be disclosed to the other parties to a proceeding as provided in section 517C.10.

 

Subd. 2. [MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.] The court may waive, modify, or limit the information exchange requirements of this chapter by order if necessary to protect a party from contact by another party.

 

Subd. 3. [ACCESS TO ADDRESS FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS.] (a) If the public authority is a party or is providing services in a child support case, a party may obtain an ex parte order under this subdivision. The party may obtain an ex parte order requiring the public authority to serve legal documents on the other party by mail if the party submits a sworn affidavit to the court stating that:

 

(1) the party needs to serve legal process in a support proceeding and does not have access to the address of the other party;

 

(2) the party has made reasonable efforts to locate the other party; and

 

(3) the other party is not represented by counsel.

 

(b) The public authority must serve legal documents provided by the moving party at the last known address of the other party upon receipt of a court order under paragraph (a). The public authority must provide for appropriate service and must certify to all parties the date of service by mail. The public authority's proof of service must not include the place or address of service.

 

(c) The state court administrator must prepare and make available forms for use in seeking access to an address under this subdivision.

 

Sec. 9. [517C.12] [INCOME.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION.] For purposes of calculating child support under this chapter, "income" means gross income.

 

Subd. 2. [SOURCES.] For purposes of this chapter, income includes any form of periodic payment to an individual including, but not limited to:

 

(1) wages;

 

(2) salaries;

 

(3) payments to an independent contractor;

 

(4) workers' compensation;

 

(5) unemployment insurance benefits;

 

(6) annuity;

 

(7) military and naval retirement;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7396

(8) pension and disability payments; and

 

(9) in-kind payments received by the obligor in the course of employment, self-employment, or operation of a business if the payments reduce the obligor's living expenses.

 

Subd. 3. [COMMISSIONS; BONUSES.] If the court finds that a party's commissions or bonuses are reliable and predictable, the court may include them in income calculations.

 

Subd. 4. [SELF-EMPLOYMENT; INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.] Income from self-employment is equal to gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses. Ordinary and necessary expenses include what would otherwise be the employer's share of the contributions under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), United States Code, title 26, subtitle C, chapter 21, subchapter A, sections 3101 to 3126. Ordinary and necessary expenses do not necessarily include amounts allowed by the Internal Revenue Service for accelerated depreciation expenses or investment tax credits or any other business expenses determined by the court to be inappropriate for determining income for purposes of child support. The person seeking to deduct an expense, including depreciation, has the burden of proving, if challenged, that the expense is ordinary and necessary. Income calculated under this section may be different from taxable income.

 

Subd. 5. [PUBLIC ASSISTANCE EXCLUSIONS.] Benefits received under chapter 256J and Title IV-A of the Social Security Act are not income under this section.

 

Subd. 6. [OVERTIME.] (a) Income does not include compensation received by a party for employment in excess of a 40-hour work week if:

 

(1) the excess employment is not within the normal range of hours worked, given the party's employment history;

 

(2) the excess employment is voluntary and not a condition of employment;

 

(3) the excess employment is in the nature of additional, part-time, or overtime employment compensable by the hour or fraction of an hour; and

 

(4) the party's compensation structure has not been changed for the purpose of affecting a child support obligation.

 

(b) The court may presume that a party with seasonal or intermittent income who works periods in excess of a 40-hour work week, but who works a substantially normal number of hours over the course of a year, is working within the normal range of hours worked.

 

Subd. 7. [INCOME OF A SPOUSE OR OTHER HOUSEHOLD MEMBER.] (a) Income must not include the income of a party's spouse or other household member. The court must not consider the income or resources provided by a spouse or other household member when determining all the earnings, income, and resources of a parent under sections 517C.25 to 517C.29.

 

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the court may issue an order permitting discovery of a spouse's or other household member's income information if there is probable cause to believe the spouse or other household member is being used to shelter income from a party. If the court finds that income was improperly or unfairly sheltered, it may impute income to the party or otherwise adjust the support amount in a just and proper manner. However, the court may not under any circumstances consider income or resources properly attributable to a spouse or other household member when setting support.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7397

Subd. 8. [PRIOR SUPPORT OR MAINTENANCE ORDERS.] The amount of a support or maintenance order, not including orders for support or maintenance debts or arrears, must be deducted from income.

 

Subd. 9. [LEGALLY DEPENDENT CHILD.] (a) For purposes of this subdivision, a "legally dependent child" means a child:

 

(1) whose primary residence is with a parent eligible for a deduction from income under this subdivision;

 

(2) whom the parent has the legal duty to support;

 

(3) who is not a subject of the current child support action;

 

(4) for whom the parent is not ordered to pay child support; and

 

(5) for whom no other person has court-ordered sole physical custody.

 

(b) The court must deduct an amount from a parent's income for a legally dependent child. The amount deducted from income for each legally dependent child must be computed using the following method:

 

(1) determine 120 percent of the federal poverty guidelines for a family size equal to two parents plus each legally dependent child;

 

(2) divide the amount determined under clause (1) by the family size determined under clause (1);

 

(3) multiply the amount calculated under clause (2) by the number of legally dependent children; and

 

(4) divide the amount calculated under clause (3) by two to determine the deduction amount for one parent. The amount determined for one parent must be divided by 12 to determine the amount of the deduction from a parent's monthly income.

 

(c) The commissioner of human services must publish a table listing the amount of the deduction for each legally dependent child by family size and must update the table for changes to the federal poverty guidelines by July 1 of each year.

 

Sec. 10. [517C.13] [IMPUTED INCOME.]

 

Subdivision 1. [NONAPPEARANCE OF A PARENT.] If a parent under the jurisdiction of the court does not appear at a court hearing after proper notice of the time and place of the hearing, the court must set income for that parent based on credible evidence before the court or in accordance with subdivision 3. Credible evidence may include documentation of current or recent income, testimony of the other parent concerning recent earnings and income levels, and the parent's wage reports filed with the Minnesota Department of Economic Security under section 268.044.

 

Subd. 2. [VOLUNTARY UNEMPLOYMENT OR UNDEREMPLOYMENT.] (a) The principles of income imputation apply equally to both parents.

 

(b) If the court finds that a parent is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed or was voluntarily unemployed or underemployed during the period for which past support is being sought, a court must calculate support based on a determination of imputed income.

 

(c) A parent is not considered voluntarily unemployed or underemployed upon a showing by the parent that:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7398

(1) the unemployment or underemployment is temporary and will ultimately lead to an increase in income;

 

(2) the unemployment or underemployment represents a bona fide career change that outweighs the adverse effect of that parent's diminished income on the child;

 

(3) the parent is a recipient of public assistance under section 256.741; or

 

(4) the parent is physically or mentally incapacitated.

 

(d) Imputed income means the estimated earning ability of a parent based on the parent's prior earnings history, education, and job skills, and on availability of jobs within the community for an individual with the parent's qualifications.

 

Subd. 3. [INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION.] If there is insufficient information to determine actual income or to impute income pursuant to subdivision 1 or 2, the court may calculate support based on full-time employment of 40 hours per week at 150 percent of the federal minimum wage or the Minnesota minimum wage, whichever is higher.

 

Subd. 4. [PARENT PROVIDING AT-HOME CHILD CARE.] If a parent stays home to care for a child who is the subject of the child support order, the court must consider the following factors when determining whether the parent is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed:

 

(1) the parties' parenting and child care arrangements before the child support action;

 

(2) the stay-at-home parent's employment history, including recency of employment and earnings, and the availability of jobs within the community for an individual with the parent's qualifications;

 

(3) the relationship between the employment-related expenses, including child care, transportation costs, suitable clothing, and other items required for the parent to be employed, and the income the stay-at-home parent could receive from available jobs within the community for an individual with the parent's qualifications;

 

(4) the child's age and health, including whether the child is physically or mentally disabled; and

 

(5) the availability of appropriate child care providers.

 

Sec. 11. [517C.14] [PRESUMPTIVE CHILD SUPPORT ORDER; GENERAL.]

 

Subdivision 1. [REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION.] The guidelines in sections 517C.12 to 517C.18 are a rebuttable presumption and must be used in all cases when establishing or modifying child support.

 

Subd. 2. [CHILD'S INSURANCE BENEFIT.] In establishing or modifying child support, if a child receives a child's insurance benefit under United States Code, title 42, section 402, because the obligor is entitled to old age or disability insurance benefits, the amount of support ordered must be offset by the amount of the child's benefit. The court must make findings regarding the obligor's income from all sources, the child support amount calculated under this chapter, the amount of the child's benefit, and the obligor's child support obligation. A benefit received by the child in a given month in excess of the child support obligation must not be treated as a payment of arrears or a future payment.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7399

Sec. 12. [517C.15] [BASIC SUPPORT.]

 

Subdivision 1. [BASIC SUPPORT; SCHEDULE.] (a) Unless otherwise agreed to by the parents and approved by the court, the court must order that basic support be divided between the parents based on their proportionate share of the parents' combined monthly income, as determined under section 517C.12.

 

(b) For parents with a combined monthly income less than or equal to 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines amount for two people, the commissioner of human services must determine the percentages in this paragraph by taking two times the minimum basic support amount under section 517C.18, subdivision 2, divided by 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines amount for two people. For all other parents, basic support must be computed using the following schedule, prepared based on 2001 United States Department of Agriculture expenditure data:

 

Parents' Number of Children

Combined

Monthly

Income One Two Three Four Five Six

 

Below $1,000 10.0% 16.1% 18.6% 21.6% 25.1% 29.1%

$1,000 - $1,499 10.0% 16.1% 18.6% 21.6% 25.1% 29.1%

$1,500 - $1,999 19.4% 31.3% 36.2% 42.0% 48.7% 56.5%

$2,000 - $2,499 28.7% 46.3% 53.5% 62.1% 72.0% 83.5%

$2,500 - $2,999 25.0% 40.3% 46.5% 53.9% 62.6% 72.6%

$3,000 - $3,499 22.5% 36.3% 41.9% 48.6% 56.4% 65.4%

$3,500 - $3,999 20.7% 33.4% 38.5% 44.7% 51.8% 60.1%

$4,000 - $4,499 19.4% 31.2% 36.1% 41.9% 48.6% 56.3%

$4,500 - $4,999 18.3% 29.6% 34.1% 39.6% 45.9% 53.2%

$5,000 - $5,499 17.5% 28.2% 32.6% 37.8% 43.9% 50.9%

$5,500 - $5,999 16.8% 27.1% 31.3% 36.3% 42.1% 48.9%

$6,000 - $6,400 16.2% 26.2% 30.2% 35.0% 40.6% 47.1%

$6,500 - $6,999 15.8% 25.4% 29.3% 34.0% 39.4% 45.7%

$7,000 - $7,499 15.4% 24.8% 28.6% 33.2% 38.5% 44.6%

$7,500 - $7,999 15.0% 24.2% 27.9% 32.4% 37.5% 43.5%

$8,000 - $8,499 14.7% 23.7% 27.3% 31.7% 36.7% 42.6%

$8,500 - $8,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$9,000 - $9,499 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$9,500 - $9,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$10,000 - $10,499 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$10,500 - $10,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$11,000 - $11,499 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$11,500 - $11,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$12,000 - $12,499 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$12,500 - $12,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$13,000 - $13,499 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$13,500 - $13,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$14,000 - $14,499 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$14,500 - $14,999 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%

$15,000 or the amount

in effect under subd. 4 14.4% 23.3% 26.8% 31.1% 36.1% 41.8%


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7400

(c) The commissioner of human services must compute and publish a schedule of basic support amounts calculated using the percentages in paragraph (b). The schedule must show basic support amounts for combined monthly income increments of not more than $100. The commissioner must determine the percentages for each income increment by interpolating between the percentages in paragraph (b). The commissioner may disregard a fractional part of a dollar unless it amounts to 50 cents or more, in which case the commissioner may increase the amount by $1.

 

Subd. 2. [SEPARATE HOUSEHOLD ADJUSTMENT.] After determining each parent's basic support under subdivision 1, the court must reduce the basic support of each parent by 20 percent.

 

Subd. 3. [JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY.] (a) If the parents' parenting time approximates joint physical custody, an obligor's basic support obligation is 50 percent of the difference between the parents' basic support obligation, as determined under subdivision 1.

 

(b) A parenting time division approximates joint physical custody if each parent provides, or is responsible for providing, care at least 45 percent of the days in a year.

 

(c) For purposes of this subdivision, the following principles apply:

 

(1) the label given to a custody arrangement is not determinative;

 

(2) the actual division of parenting time controls; and

 

(3) an overnight stay presumptively constitutes a day of caregiving.

 

(d) The court must make specific findings in support of an adjustment to an obligor's basic support obligation under this subdivision.

 

Subd. 4. [INCOME CAP ON DETERMINING BASIC SUPPORT.] (a) The basic support obligation for parents with a combined monthly income in excess of the income limit currently in effect under subdivision 1 must be the same dollar amount as provided for parents with a combined monthly income equal to the income limit in effect under subdivision 1.

 

(b) A court may order a basic support obligation in a child support order in an amount that exceeds the income limit in subdivision 1 if it finds that a child has a disability or other substantial, demonstrated need for the additional support and that the additional support will directly benefit the child.

 

(c) The dollar amount for the cap in subdivision 1 must be adjusted on July 1 of every even-numbered year to reflect cost-of-living changes. The Supreme Court must select the index for the adjustment from the indices listed in section 517C.31. The state court administrator must make the changes in the dollar amounts required by this paragraph available to courts and the public on or before April 30 of the year in which the amount is to change.

 

Subd. 5. [MORE THAN SIX CHILDREN.] If a child support proceeding involves more than six children, the court may derive a support order without specifically following the guidelines. However, the court must consider the basic principles encompassed by the guidelines and must consider both parents' needs, resources, and circumstances.

 

Subd. 6. [REPORT TO LEGISLATURE.] By January 15 each year, the commissioner of human services must submit a report to the legislature on the basic support schedule. The report must include the following:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7401

(1) information on any changes to the United States Department of Agriculture expenditure data used in constructing the basic support schedule under subdivision 1;

 

(2) information on any new sources of economic data that could be used to construct a basic support schedule; and

 

(3) a summary of any problems or concerns with implementing or applying the basic support schedule, and recommendations on how to resolve those problems or concerns.

 

Sec. 13. [517C.16] [CHILD CARE SUPPORT.]

 

Subdivision 1. [CHILD CARE COSTS.] Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and approved by the court, the court must order that the child care costs be divided between the obligor and obligee based on their proportionate share of the parties' combined monthly income, as determined under section 517C.12.

 

Subd. 2. [LOW-INCOME OBLIGOR.] (a) If the obligor's income as determined under section 517C.12 meets the income eligibility requirements for child care assistance under the basic sliding fee program under chapter 119B, the court must order the obligor to pay the lesser of the following amounts:

 

(1) the amount of the obligor's monthly co-payment for child care assistance under the basic sliding fee schedule established by the commissioner of children, families, and learning under chapter 119B, based on an obligor's monthly gross income as determined under section 517C.12 and the size of the obligor's household. For purposes of this subdivision, the obligor's household includes the obligor and the number of children for whom child support is being ordered; or

 

(2) the amount of the obligor's child care obligation under subdivision 1.

 

(b) The commissioner of human services must publish a table with the child care assistance basic sliding fee amounts and update the table for changes to the basic sliding fee schedule by July 1 of each year.

 

Subd. 3. [DETERMINING COSTS.] (a) The court must require verification of employment or school attendance and documentation of child care expenses from the obligee and the public authority, if applicable.

 

(b) If child care expenses fluctuate during the year because of the obligee's seasonal employment or school attendance or extended periods of parenting time with the obligor, the court must determine child care expenses based on an average monthly cost.

 

(c) The amount allocated for child care expenses is considered child support but is not subject to a cost-of-living adjustment under section 517C.31.

 

(d) The court may allow the parent with whom the child does not reside to care for the child while the parent with whom the child resides is working or attending school, as provided in section 517B.25, subdivision 8. Allowing the parent with whom the child does not reside to care for the child under section 517B.25, subdivision 8, is not a reason to deviate from the guidelines.

 

Subd. 4. [CHANGE IN CHILD CARE.] (a) When a court order provides for child care expenses and the public authority provides child support enforcement services, the public authority must suspend collecting the amount allocated for child care expenses when: (1) either party informs the public authority that no child care costs are being incurred; and (2) the public authority verifies the accuracy of the information. The public authority will resume collecting child care expenses when either party provides information that child care costs have resumed.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7402

(b) If the parties provide conflicting information to the public authority regarding whether child care expenses are being incurred, the public authority will continue or resume collecting child care expenses. Either party, by motion to the court, may challenge the suspension or resumption of the collection of child care expenses. If the public authority suspends collection activities for the amount allocated for child care expenses, all other provisions of the court order remain in effect.

 

(c) In cases where there is a substantial increase or decrease in child care expenses, the parties may modify the order under section 517C.31.

 

Sec. 14. [517C.17] [MEDICAL SUPPORT.]

 

Subdivision 1. [DEFINITIONS.] The definitions in this subdivision apply to this chapter.

 

(a) "Health care coverage" means health care benefits that are provided by a health plan. Health care coverage does not include any form of medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L.

 

(b) "Health carrier" means a carrier as defined in sections 62A.011, subdivision 2, and 62L.02, subdivision 16.

 

(c) "Health plan" means a plan meeting the definition under section 62A.011, subdivision 3, a group health plan governed under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a self-insured plan under sections 43A.23 to 43A.317 and 471.617, or a policy, contract, or certificate issued by a community-integrated service network licensed under chapter 62N. Health plan includes plans: (1) provided on an individual and group basis, (2) provided by an employer or union, (3) purchased in the private market, and (4) available to a person eligible to carry insurance for the child. Health plan includes a plan providing for dependent-only, dental, or vision coverage and a plan provided through a party's spouse or parent.

 

(d) "Medical support" means providing health care coverage for a child by carrying health care coverage for the child or by contributing to the cost of health care coverage, public coverage, unreimbursed medical expenses, and uninsured medical expenses of the child.

 

(e) "National medical support notice" means an administrative notice issued by the public authority to enforce health insurance provisions of a support order in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section 303.32, in cases where the public authority provides support enforcement services.

 

(f) "Public coverage" means health care benefits provided by any form of medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L.

 

(g) "Uninsured medical expenses" means a child's reasonable and necessary health-related expenses if the child is not covered by a health plan or public coverage when the expenses are incurred.

 

(h) "Unreimbursed medical expenses" means a child's reasonable and necessary health-related expenses if a child is covered by a health plan or public coverage and the plan or coverage does not pay for the total cost of the expenses when the expenses are incurred. Unreimbursed medical expenses do not include the cost of premiums. Unreimbursed medical expenses include, but are not limited to, deductibles, co-payments, and expenses for orthodontia, prescription eyeglasses and contact lenses, and over-the-counter medicine.

 

Subd. 2. [ORDER.] (a) A completed national medical support notice issued by the public authority or a court order that complies with this section is a qualified medical child support order under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, section 1169(a).


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7403

(b) Every order addressing child support must state:

 

(1) the names, last known addresses, and social security numbers of the parents and the child that is a subject of the order unless the court prohibits the inclusion of an address or social security number and orders the parents to provide the address and social security number to the administrator of the health plan;

 

(2) whether appropriate health care coverage for the child is available and, if so, state:

 

(i) which party must carry health care coverage;

 

(ii) the cost of premiums and how the cost is allocated between the parties;

 

(iii) how unreimbursed expenses will be allocated and collected by the parties; and

 

(iv) the circumstances, if any, under which the obligation to provide health care coverage for the child will shift from one party to the other;

 

(3) if appropriate health care coverage is not available for the child, whether a contribution for medical support is required; and

 

(4) whether the amount ordered for medical support is subject to a cost-of-living adjustment under section 517C.31.

 

Subd. 3. [DETERMINING APPROPRIATE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.] (a) In determining whether a party has appropriate health care coverage for the child, the court must evaluate the health plan using the following factors:

 

(1) accessible coverage. Dependent health care coverage is accessible if the covered child can obtain services from a health plan provider with reasonable effort by the parent with whom the child resides. Health care coverage is presumed accessible if:

 

(i) primary care coverage is available within 30 minutes or 30 miles of the child's residence and specialty care coverage is available within 60 minutes or 60 miles of the child's residence;

 

(ii) the coverage is available through an employer and the employee can be expected to remain employed for a reasonable amount of time; and

 

(iii) no preexisting conditions exist to delay coverage unduly;

 

(2) comprehensive coverage. Dependent health care coverage is comprehensive if it includes, at a minimum, medical and hospital coverage and provides for preventive, emergency, acute, and chronic care. If both parties have health care coverage that meets the minimum requirements, the court must determine which health care coverage is more comprehensive by considering whether the coverage includes:

 

(i) basic dental coverage;

 

(ii) orthodontia;

 

(iii) eyeglasses;

 

(iv) contact lenses;


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7404

(v) mental health services; or

 

(vi) substance abuse treatment;

 

(3) affordable coverage. Dependent health care coverage is affordable if a party's gross income is 150 percent of the federal poverty guidelines or more and the party's contribution to the health care coverage premium does not exceed five percent of the party's gross income. If a party's gross income is less than 150 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, it is presumed that the party is unable to contribute to the cost of health care coverage unless health care is available at no or low cost to that party; and

 

(4) the child's special medical needs, if any.

 

(b) If both parties have health care coverage available for a child, and the court determines under paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), that the available coverage is comparable with regard to accessibility and comprehensiveness, the least costly health care coverage is the appropriate health care coverage for the child.

 

Subd. 4. [ORDERING HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.] (a) If a child is presently enrolled in health care coverage, the court must order that the parent who currently has the child enrolled continue that enrollment unless the parties agree otherwise or a party requests a change in coverage and the court determines that other health care coverage is more appropriate.

 

(b) If a child is not presently enrolled in health care coverage, upon motion of a party or the public authority, the court must determine whether one or both parties have appropriate health care coverage for the child and order the party with appropriate health care coverage available to carry the coverage for the child.

 

(c) If only one party has appropriate health care coverage available, the court must order that party to carry the coverage for the child.

 

(d) If both parties have appropriate health care coverage available, the court must order the parent with whom the child resides to carry the coverage for the child, unless:

 

(1) either party expresses a preference for coverage available through the parent with whom the child does not reside;

 

(2) the parent with whom the child does not reside is already carrying dependent health care coverage for other children and the cost of contributing to the premiums of the other parent's coverage would cause the parent with whom the child does not reside extreme hardship; or

 

(3) the parents agree to provide coverage and agree on the allocation of costs.

 

(e) If the exception in paragraph (d), clause (1) or (2) applies, the court must determine which party has the most appropriate coverage available and order that party to carry coverage for the child. If the court determines under subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), that the parties' health care coverage for the child is comparable with regard to accessibility and comprehensiveness, the court must order the party with the least costly health care coverage to carry coverage for the child.

 

(f) If neither party has appropriate health care coverage available, the court must order the parent with whom the child does not reside to contribute toward the cost of public coverage for the child or the child's uninsured medical expenses in an amount equal to the lesser of:

 

(1) five percent of gross income; or


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7405

(2) the monthly amount the parent with whom the child does not reside would pay for the child's premiums if the parent's income meets the eligibility requirements for public coverage. For purposes of determining the premium amount, a parent's household size is equal to the parent plus the child who is the subject of the child support order. The court may order the parent with whom the child resides to apply for public coverage for the child.

 

(g) The commissioner of human services must publish a table with the premium schedule for public coverage and update the chart for changes to the schedule by July 1 of each year.

 

Subd. 5. [MEDICAL SUPPORT COSTS; UNREIMBURSED AND UNINSURED MEDICAL EXPENSES.] (a) Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and approved by the court, the court must order that the cost of health care coverage and all unreimbursed and uninsured medical expenses be divided between the obligor and obligee based on their proportionate share of the parties' combined monthly income, as determined under section 517C.12.

 

(b) If a party owes a child support obligation for a child and is ordered to carry health care coverage for the child, and the other party is ordered to contribute to the carrying party's cost for coverage, the carrying party's child support payment must be reduced by the amount of the contributing party's contribution.

 

(c) If a party owes a child support obligation for a child and is ordered to contribute to the other party's cost for carrying health care coverage for the child, the contributing party's child support payment must be increased by the amount of the contribution.

 

(d) If a party's obligation for health care coverage premiums is greater than five percent of the party's gross income, the court may order the other party to contribute more for the cost of the premiums, if doing so would not result in extreme hardship to that party. If an additional contribution causes a party extreme hardship, the court must order the obligor to contribute the lesser of the two amounts under subdivision 4, paragraph (f).

 

(e) If the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child already carries dependent health care coverage for other dependents and would incur no additional premium costs to add the child to the existing coverage, the court must not order the other party to contribute to the premium costs for coverage of the child.

 

(f) If a party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child does not already carry dependent health care coverage but has other dependents who may be added to the ordered coverage, the full premium costs of the dependent health care coverage must be allocated between the parties in proportion to the party's share of the parties' combined income, unless the parties agree otherwise.

 

(g) If a party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child is required to enroll in a health plan so that the child can be enrolled in dependent health care coverage under the plan, the court must allocate the costs of the dependent health care coverage between the parties. The costs of the health care coverage for the party ordered to carry the coverage for the child must not be allocated between the parties.

 

Subd. 6. [NOTICE OR COURT ORDER SENT TO PARTY'S EMPLOYER, UNION, OR HEALTH CARRIER.] (a) The public authority must forward a copy of the national medical support notice or court order for health care coverage to the party's employer within two business days after the date the party is entered into the work reporting system under section 256.998.

 

(b) The public authority or a party seeking to enforce an order for health care coverage must forward a copy of the national medical support notice or court order to the obligor's employer or union, or to the health carrier under the following circumstances:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7406

(1) the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child fails to provide written proof to the other party or the public authority, within 30 days of the effective date of the court order, that the party has applied for health care coverage for the child;

 

(2) the party seeking to enforce the order or the public authority gives written notice to the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child of its intent to enforce medical support. The party seeking to enforce the order or public authority must mail the written notice to the last known address of the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child; and

 

(3) the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child fails, within 15 days after the date on which the written notice under clause (2) was mailed, to provide written proof to the other party or the public authority that the party has applied for health care coverage for the child.

 

(c) The public authority is not required to forward a copy of the national medical support notice or court order to the obligor's employer or union, or to the health carrier, if the court orders health care coverage for the child that is not employer-based or union-based coverage.

 

Subd. 7. [EMPLOYER OR UNION REQUIREMENTS.] (a) An employer or union must forward the national medical support notice or court order to its health plan within 20 business days after the date on the national medical support notice or after receipt of the court order.

 

(b) Upon determination by an employer's or union's health plan administrator that a child is eligible to be covered under the health plan, the employer or union and health plan must enroll the child as a beneficiary in the health plan, and the employer must withhold any required premiums from the income or wages of the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child.

 

(c) If enrollment of the party ordered to carry health care coverage for a child is necessary to obtain dependent health care coverage under the plan, and the party is not enrolled in the health plan, the employer or union must enroll the party in the plan.

 

(d) Enrollment of dependents and, if necessary, the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child must be immediate and not dependent upon open enrollment periods. Enrollment is not subject to the underwriting policies under section 62A.048.

 

(e) Failure of the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the child to execute any documents necessary to enroll the dependent in the health plan does not affect the obligation of the employer or union and health plan to enroll the dependent in a plan. Information and authorization provided by the public authority, or by a party or guardian, is valid for the purposes of meeting enrollment requirements of the health plan.

 

(f) An employer or union that is included under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, section 1169(a), may not deny enrollment to the child or to the parent if necessary to enroll the child based on exclusionary clauses described in section 62A.048.

 

(g) A new employer or union of a party who is ordered to provide health care coverage for a child must enroll the child in the party's health plan as required by a national medical support notice or court order.

 

Subd. 8. [HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS.] (a) If a health plan administrator receives a completed national medical support notice or court order, the plan administrator must notify the parties, and the public authority if the public authority provides support enforcement services, within 40 business days after the date of the notice or after receipt of the court order, of the following:


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7407

(1) whether coverage is available to the child under the terms of the health plan and, if not, the reason why coverage is not available;

 

(2) whether the child is covered under the health plan;

 

(3) the effective date of the child's coverage under the health plan; and

 

(4) what steps, if any, are required to effectuate the child's coverage under the health plan.

 

(b) If the employer or union offers more than one plan and the national medical support notice or court order does not specify the plan to be carried, the plan administrator must notify the parents and the public authority if the public authority provides support enforcement services. When there is more than one option available under the plan, the public authority, in consultation with the parent with whom the child resides, must promptly select from available plan options.

 

(c) The plan administrator must provide the parents and public authority, if the public authority provides support enforcement services, with a notice of the child's enrollment, description of the coverage, and any documents necessary to effectuate coverage.

 

(d) The health plan must send copies of all correspondence regarding the health care coverage to the parents.

 

(e) An insured child's parent's signature is a valid authorization to a health plan for purposes of processing an insurance reimbursement payment to the medical services provider or to the parent, if medical services have been prepaid by that parent.

 

Subd. 9. [EMPLOYER OR UNION LIABILITY.] (a) An employer or union that willfully fails to comply with the order or notice is liable for any uninsured medical expenses incurred by the dependents while the dependents were eligible to be enrolled in the health plan and for any other premium costs incurred because the employer or union willfully failed to comply with the order or notice.

 

(b) An employer or union that fails to comply with the order or notice is subject to a contempt finding, a $250 civil penalty under section 517C.57, and is subject to a civil penalty of $500 to be paid to the party entitled to reimbursement or the public authority. Penalties paid to the public authority are designated for child support enforcement services.

 

Subd. 10. [CONTESTING ENROLLMENT.] (a) A party may contest a child's enrollment in a health plan on the limited grounds that the enrollment is improper due to mistake of fact or that the enrollment meets the requirements of section 517C.26.

 

(b) If the party chooses to contest the enrollment, the party must do so no later than 15 days after the employer notifies the party of the enrollment by doing the following:

 

(1) filing a motion in district court or according to section 484.702 and the expedited child support process rules if the public authority provides support enforcement services;

 

(2) serving the motion on the other party and public authority if the public authority provides support enforcement services; and

 

(3) securing a date for the matter to be heard no later than 45 days after the notice of enrollment.

 

(c) The enrollment must remain in place while the party contests the enrollment.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7408

Subd. 11. [DISENROLLMENT; CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE; COVERAGE OPTIONS.] (a) Unless a court order provides otherwise, a child for whom a party is required to provide health care coverage under this section must be covered as a dependent of the party until the child is emancipated, until further order of the court, or as consistent with the terms of the coverage.

 

(b) The health carrier, employer, or union may not disenroll or eliminate coverage for the child unless:

 

(1) the health carrier, employer, or union is provided satisfactory written evidence that the court order is no longer in effect;

 

(2) the child is or will be enrolled in comparable health care coverage through another health plan that will take effect no later than the effective date of the disenrollment;

 

(3) the employee is no longer eligible for dependent coverage; or

 

(4) the required premium has not been paid by or on behalf of the child.

 

(c) The health plan must provide 30 days' written notice to the child's parents, and the public authority if the public authority provides support enforcement services, before the health plan disenrolls or eliminates the child's coverage.

 

(d) A child enrolled in health care coverage under a qualified medical child support order, including a national medical support notice, under this section is a dependent and a qualified beneficiary under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), Public Law 99-272. Upon expiration of the order, the child is entitled to the opportunity to elect continued coverage that is available under the health plan. The employer or union must provide notice to the parties and the public authority, if it provides support services, within ten days of the termination date.

 

(e) If the public authority provides support enforcement services and a plan administrator reports to the public authority that there is more than one coverage option available under the health plan, the public authority, in consultation with the parent with whom the child resides, must promptly select coverage from the available options.

 

Subd. 12. [SPOUSAL OR FORMER SPOUSAL COVERAGE.] The court must require the parent with whom the child does not reside to provide dependent health care coverage for the benefit of the parent with whom the child resides if the parent is ordered to provide dependent health care coverage for the parties' child and adding the other parent to the coverage results in no additional premium cost.

 

Subd. 13. [DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION.] (a) If the public authority provides support enforcement services, the parties must provide the public authority with the following information:

 

(1) information relating to dependent health care coverage or public coverage available for the benefit of the child for whom support is sought, including all information required to be included in a medical support order under this section;

 

(2) verification that application for court-ordered health care coverage was made within 30 days of the court's order; and

 

(3) the reason that a child is not enrolled in court-ordered health care coverage, if a child is not enrolled in coverage or subsequently loses coverage.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7409

(b) Upon request from the public authority under section 256.978, an employer, union, or plan administrator, including an employer subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, section 1169(a), must provide the public authority the following information:

 

(1) information relating to dependent health care coverage available to a party for the benefit of the child for whom support is sought, including all information required to be included in a medical support order under this section; and

 

(2) information that will enable the public authority to determine whether a health plan is appropriate for a child, including, but not limited to, all available plan options, any geographic service restrictions, and the location of service providers.

 

(c) The employer, union, or plan administrator must not release information regarding one party to the other party. The employer, union, or plan administrator must provide both parties with insurance identification cards and all necessary written information to enable the parties to utilize the insurance benefits for the covered dependent.

 

(d) The public authority is authorized to release to a party's employer, union, or health plan information necessary to verify availability of dependent health care coverage, or to establish, modify, or enforce medical support.

 

(e) An employee must disclose to an employer if medical support is required to be withheld under this section and the employer must begin withholding according to the terms of the order and under section 517C.52. If an employee discloses an obligation to obtain health care coverage and coverage is available through the employer, the employer must make all application processes known to the individual and enroll the employee and dependent in the plan.

 

Subd. 14. [CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES.] The public authority must take necessary steps to establish and enforce an order for medical support if the child receives public assistance or a party completes an application for services from the public authority under section 517C.38, subdivision 2.

 

Subd. 15. [ENFORCEMENT.] (a) Remedies available for collecting and enforcing child support apply to medical support.

 

(b) For the purpose of enforcement, the following are additional support:

 

(1) the costs of individual or group health or hospitalization coverage;

 

(2) dental coverage;

 

(3) medical costs ordered by the court to be paid by either party, including health and dental insurance premiums paid by the obligee because of the obligor's failure to obtain coverage as ordered; and

 

(4) liabilities established under this subdivision.

 

(c) A party who fails to carry court-ordered dependent health care coverage is liable for the child's uninsured medical expenses unless a court order provides otherwise. A party's failure to carry court-ordered coverage, or to provide other medical support as ordered, is a basis for modification of a support order under section 517C.28.

 

(d) Payments by the health carrier or employer for services rendered to the dependents that are directed to a party not owed reimbursement must be endorsed over to and forwarded to the vendor or appropriate party or the public authority. A party retaining insurance reimbursement not owed to the party is liable for the amount of the reimbursement.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7410

Subd. 16. [INCOME WITHHOLDING; OFFSET.] (a) If a party owes no child support obligation for a child and is an obligor ordered to contribute to the other party's cost for carrying health care coverage for the child, the obligor is subject to an offset under subdivision 5 or income withholding under section 517C.52.

 

(b) If a party's court-ordered health care coverage for the child terminates and the child is not enrolled in other health care coverage or public coverage, and a modification motion is not pending, the public authority may remove the offset to a party's child support obligation or terminate income withholding instituted against a party under section 517C.52. The public authority must provide notice to the parties of the action.

 

(c) A party may contest the public authority's action to remove the offset to the child support obligation or terminate income withholding if the party makes a written request for a hearing within 30 days after receiving written notice. If a party makes a timely request for a hearing, the public authority must schedule a hearing and send written notice of the hearing to the parties by mail to the parties' last known addresses at least 14 days before the hearing. The hearing must be conducted in district court or in the expedited child support process if section 484.702 applies. The district court or child support magistrate must determine whether removing the offset or terminating income withholding is appropriate and, if appropriate, the effective date for the removal or termination.

 

(d) If the party does not request a hearing, the district court or child support magistrate must order the offset or income withholding termination effective the first day of the month following termination of the child's health care coverage.

 

Subd. 17. [COLLECTING UNREIMBURSED AND UNINSURED MEDICAL EXPENSES.] (a) A party must initiate a request for reimbursement of unreimbursed and uninsured medical expenses within two years of the date that the party incurred the unreimbursed or uninsured medical expenses. The time period in this paragraph does not apply if the location of the other party is unknown.

 

(b) A party seeking reimbursement of unreimbursed and uninsured medical expenses must mail a written notice of intent to collect the expenses and a copy of an affidavit of health care expenses to the other party at the other party's last known address.

 

(c) The written notice must include a statement that the party has 30 days from the date the notice was mailed to (1) pay in full; (2) enter a payment agreement; or (3) file a motion requesting a hearing contesting the matter. If the public authority provides support enforcement services, the written notice also must include a statement that the requesting party must submit the amount due to the public authority for collection.

 

(d) The affidavit of health care expenses must itemize and document the child's unreimbursed or uninsured medical expenses and include copies of all bills, receipts, and insurance company explanations of benefits.

 

(e) If the public authority provides support enforcement services, the party seeking reimbursement must send to the public authority a copy of the written notice, the original affidavit, and copies of all bills, receipts, and insurance company explanations of benefits.

 

(f) If the party does not respond to the request for reimbursement within 30 days, the party seeking reimbursement or public authority, if the public authority provides support enforcement services, must commence an enforcement action against the party under subdivision 18.

 

(g) The public authority must serve the other party with a notice of intent to enforce unreimbursed and uninsured medical expenses and file an affidavit of service by mail with the district court administrator. The notice must state that, unless the party (1) pays in full; (2) enters into a payment agreement; or (3) files a motion contesting the matter within 14 days of service of the notice, the public authority will commence enforcement of the expenses as medical support arrears under subdivision 18.


Journal of the House - 106th Day - Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - Top of Page 7411

(h) If the party files a timely motion for a hearing contesting the requested reimbursement, the contesting party must schedule a hearing in district court or in the expedited child support process if section 484.702 applies. The contesting party must provide the party seeking reimbursement and the public authority, if the public authority provides support enforcement services, with written notice of the hearing at least 14 days before the hearing by mailing notice of the hearing to the public authority and the party at the party's last known address. The party seeking reimbursement must file the original affidavit of health care expenses with the court at least five days before the hearing. Based upon the evidence presented, the district court or child support magistrate must determine liability for the exp