Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2517
STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-FIFTH SESSION - 2007
_____________________
FORTY-FIFTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, April 11,
2007
The House of Representatives convened at 3:00 p.m. and was
called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by Hesham Hussein, Muslim American Society
of Minnesota, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sviggum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Wardlow and Westrom were excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Bigham moved that further reading of the Journal be suspended and that the
Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2518
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Carlson from the Committee on
Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 829, A bill for an
act relating to public safety; appropriating money for the courts, public
defenders, public safety, corrections, and other criminal justice agencies;
modifying fees; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 363A.06, subdivision
1; 403.11, subdivision 1; 403.31, subdivision 1; 609.3457, subdivision 4;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 403.31, subdivision 6.
Reported the same back with
the following amendments:
Delete everything after the
enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE 1
APPROPRIATIONS
Section 1. SUMMARY OF
APPROPRIATIONS.
The amounts shown in this section summarize
direct appropriations, by fund, made in this act.
2008 2009 Total
General $926,123,000 $963,963,000 $1,890,086,000
State Government Special
Revenue 55,688,000 50,392,000 106,080,000
Environmental Fund 69,000 71,000 140,000
Special Revenue Fund 11,968,000 15,007,000 26,975,000
Trunk Highway 367,000 374,000 741,000
Total $994,215,000 $1,029,807,000 $2,024,022,000
Sec. 2. PUBLIC
SAFETY APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) General
The sums shown in the
columns marked "Appropriations" are appropriated to the agencies and
for the purposes specified in this act. The appropriations are from the general
fund, or another named fund, and are available for the fiscal years indicated
for each purpose. The figures "2008" and "2009" used in
this act mean that the appropriations listed under them are available for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, or June 30, 2009, respectively. "The
first year" is fiscal year 2008. "The second year" is fiscal
year 2009. "The biennium" is fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
Appropriations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, are effective the day
following final enactment.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2519
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Sec. 3. SUPREME COURT
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation $44,112,000 $45,443,000
The amounts that may be
spent for each purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Judicial
Salaries
Effective July 1, 2007, and
July 1, 2008, the salaries of judges of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and
district court are increased by two percent.
Subd. 3. Supreme
Court Operations 31,292,000 32,623,000
Contingent
account.
$5,000 each year is for a contingent account for expenses necessary for the
normal operation of the court for which no other reimbursement is provided.
Subd. 4. Civil
Legal Services 12,820,000 12,820,000
Legal
services to low-income clients in family law matters. Of this appropriation,
$877,000 each year is to improve the access of low-income clients to legal representation
in family law matters. This appropriation must be distributed under Minnesota
Statutes, section 480.242, to the qualified legal services programs described
in Minnesota Statutes, section 480.242, subdivision 2, paragraph (a). Any
unencumbered balance remaining in the first year does not cancel and is
available in the second year.
Sec. 4. COURT OF
APPEALS $9,766,000 $10,620,000
Caseload
increase.
$1,285,000 the first year and $1,876,000 the second year are for caseload
increases. This money must be used for three additional judge units, an
additional staff attorney, 2.67 additional full-time equivalent law clerk
positions, and for retired judges.
Sec. 5. TRIAL COURTS
$247,167,000 $257,290,000
New judge
units. $1,536,000
the first year and $2,778,000 the second year are for an increase in judge
units, including three trial court judge units in the First Judicial District,
one trial court judge unit in the Third Judicial District, one trial court
judge unit in the Ninth Judicial District and one trial court judge unit in the
Tenth Judicial District. These new judge units begin on January 1, 2008. Each
judge unit consists of a judge, law clerk, and court reporter.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2520
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Maintain
and expand drug courts. $2,242,000 the first year and $3,759,000 the second year are to
maintain and to establish new drug courts.
Guardian ad
litem services. $1,260,000 the first year and $1,629,000 the second year are for
guardian ad litem services.
Interpreter
services.
$606,000 the first year and $777,000 the second year are for interpreter
services.
Psychological
services.
$1,531,000 the first year and $2,151,000 the second year are for
psychological services.
In forma
pauperis services. $178,000 each year is for in forma pauperis services.
Sec. 6. TAX COURT
$788,000 $812,000
Sec. 7. UNIFORM LAWS
COMMISSION $58,000 $52,000
Sec. 8. BOARD ON JUDICIAL
STANDARDS $448,000 $455,000
Investigative
and hearing costs. $125,000 each year is for
special investigative and hearing costs for major disciplinary actions
undertaken by the board. This appropriation does not cancel. Any encumbered and
unspent balances remain available for these expenditures in subsequent fiscal
years.
Sec. 9. BOARD OF
PUBLIC DEFENSE $65,348,000 $68,519,000
Sec. 10. PUBLIC
SAFETY
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation $154,041,000 $154,726,000
Appropriations by Fund
2008 2009
General 91,126,000 94,032,000
Special Revenue 6,791,000 9,857,000
State Government
Special Revenue 55,688,000 50,392,000
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2521
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Environmental 69,000 71,000
Trunk Highway 367,000 374,000
The amounts that may be spent for each purpose are
specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Emergency
Management 2,939,000 2,872,000
Appropriations by Fund
General 2,870,000 2,801,000
Environmental 69,000 71,000
$250,000 each year is additional funding to provide
state match for federal disaster assistance.
$75,000 the first year is for one position to
coordinate state readiness for a pandemic event. This is a onetime
appropriation.
Crime labs and crime strike
task forces; working group. The commissioner of public safety shall convene
a working group to study the appropriateness of additional regional forensic
crime laboratories and regional crime strike task forces. The legislature may
not authorize or fund new regional forensic crime laboratories or regional
crime strike task forces until the working group convened by the commissioner
of public safety has studied and made recommendations to the legislative
committees with jurisdiction over public safety finance and capital investment.
The commissioner must consult with the chairs of the legislative committees
with responsibility for public safety finance on the membership of the working
group. The Forensic Laboratory Advisory Board, established under Minnesota
Statutes, section 299C.156, and the Gang and Drug Oversight Council,
established under section 299A.641, must provide advice and assistance to the
commissioner and the working group as requested by the commissioner. The
working group must submit its report and recommendations to the house and
senate committees with responsibility for public safety finance by February 1,
2008.
Subd. 3. Criminal
Apprehension 45,374,000 47,021,000
Appropriations by Fund
General 44,555,000 46,179,000
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2522
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Special Revenue 445,000 461,000
State Government
Special Revenue 7,000 7,000
Trunk Highway 367,000 374,000
Cooperative
investigation of cross-jurisdictional criminal activity. $93,000 each year is
appropriated from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension account in the special
revenue fund for grants to local officials for the cooperative investigation of
cross-jurisdictional criminal activity. Any unencumbered balance remaining in the
first year does not cancel but is available for the second year.
Laboratory
activities. $352,000 the first year and $368,000 the second year are
appropriated from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension account in the special
revenue fund for laboratory activities.
DWI lab
analysis.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 161.20, subdivision 3, $367,000
the first year and $374,000 the second year are appropriated from the trunk
highway fund for laboratory analysis related to driving-while-impaired cases.
CriMNet
justice information integration. $3,135,000 the first year and $3,460,000 the
second year are for statewide information integration priorities. The base for
this appropriation in fiscal year 2010 shall be $2,032,000.
Policy
group; report. The criminal and juvenile justice information policy group must
study funding sources other than the general fund for new CriMNet costs and
should present its ideas to the house and senate committees having jurisdiction
over criminal justice issues by January 15, 2008.
Forensic
scientists. $1,018,000 the first year and $1,769,000 the second year are for 19
new forensic scientists in the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Forensic Science
Laboratory.
Background
checks.
$50,000 the first year is for the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to conduct
state background checks by charitable, nonprofit mentoring organizations. Of
this amount, $10,000 is to be distributed to Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota
for background check training. Only organizations that have completed training
with Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota are eligible to receive background
checks under this provision. This is a onetime appropriation.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2523
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Subd. 4. Fire
Marshal 6,196,000 9,243,000
This appropriation is from the fire safety account
in the special revenue fund.
Of this amount, $3,330,000 the first year and
$6,300,000 the second year are for activities under Minnesota Statutes, section
299F.012.
Subd. 5. Alcohol
and Gambling Enforcement 1,785,000 1,817,000
Appropriations by Fund
General 1,635,000 1,664,000
Special Revenue 150,000 153,000
Subd. 6. Office
of Justice Programs 42,066,000 43,388,000
Crime victim reparations. $250,000 each year is to
increase the amount of funding for crime victim reparations.
Emergency assistance grant. $100,000 each year is
for grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 611A.675. This is a onetime
appropriation.
Gang and Drug Task Force. $600,000 the first year
and $1,900,000 the second year are for grants to the Gang and Drug Task Force.
Victim notification system. $455,000 each year is
for the continuation of the victim information and notification everyday (VINE)
service.
Crime prevention and law
enforcement grants. (a) $ 1,900,000 each year is for crime prevention and law
enforcement grants.
The office of justice programs shall conduct a
competitive award process that ensures that grants are awarded to the most
qualified organizations based on the office's established policies and
procedures. The office shall determine the amount of each grant award based on
need and funds available. The office shall require a grant recipient to report
back to the office quarterly during the duration of the grant, and the office
has the authority to withhold or suspend any additional grant payments if the
grant recipient fails to meet the office's performance standards.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2524
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
The following organizations
are eligible to apply for grants: (1) the city of St. Paul Police Department's
Special Investigation Unit's Asian Gang Task Force; (2) the Victim Intervention
Program, Inc.; (3) the Mosaic Youth Center; (4) Ramsey County's Juvenile
Detention Alternatives Initiative; (5) Restorative Justice Community Action,
Inc.; (6) existing supervised parenting time centers; (7) existing child
advocacy centers; (8) law enforcement agencies to make squad car camera
updates; (9) the St. Paul police and fire departments to hire an emergency
coordinator; and (10) political subdivisions to administer safe cab programs.
Any grant awarded to an organization in clause (5) may not be used for
restorative justice in domestic violence cases. Any grant awarded to a
political subdivision in clause (10) may comprise no more than one-third of the
full operating cost of the program. This is a onetime appropriation.
(b) The executive director
of the office of justice programs shall prepare a report containing the
following information: a list of grant recipients, the amount of each award,
the performance and eligibility standards used to determine the amount and
recipient of each award, the office's reporting requirements, the grant
recipient's use of the award, and any other information the director deems
relevant. By January 1, 2010, the office of justice programs shall submit the
report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house
committees and divisions having jurisdiction over criminal justice funding and
policy.
Crime
victims.
$2,271,000 each year is to increase funding for victim services. Of this
amount, 59 percent is for battered women shelters, 17 percent is for domestic
violence programs, eight percent is for general crime victims, 11 percent is
for sexual assault programs, and five percent is for abused children programs.
COPS
grants.
$1,000,000 each year is to hire new peace officers and for peace officer
overtime pay under Minnesota Statutes, section 299A.62, subdivision 1,
paragraph (b), clauses (1) and (2). The commissioner shall award the grants
based on the procedures set forth under section 299A.62. Of this amount, at
least $250,000 each year must be awarded to two cities in Hennepin County that
are not cities of the first class and have the highest part 1 and part 2 crime
rates per 100,000 inhabitants in the county as calculated by the latest Bureau
of Criminal Apprehension report. This is a onetime appropriation.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2525
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Auto theft
emergency grant. $75,000 each year is appropriated from the general fund to the
commissioner of public safety to fund grants awarded under Minnesota Statutes,
section 611A.675, subdivision 1, clause (6). This amount shall be added to the
department's base budget.
Youth
intervention programs. $1,000,000 each year is for youth intervention programs under
Minnesota Statutes, section 299A.73. The commissioner shall use this money to
make grants to help existing programs serve unmet needs in their communities
and to fund new programs in underserved areas of the state. This appropriation
is added to the base budget and is available until expended.
Trafficking
legal clinics. $150,000 each year is appropriated from the general fund to the
commissioner of public safety to distribute to the grantees described in
Minnesota Statutes, section 299A.786. This is a onetime appropriation.
Administration
costs. Up
to 2.5 percent of the grant funds appropriated in this subdivision may be used
to administer the grant program.
Subd. 7. 911
Emergency Services/ARMER 55,681,000 50,385,000
This appropriation is from
the state government special revenue fund for 911 emergency telecommunications
services.
Public
safety answering points. $13,664,000 each year is to be distributed as
provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 403.113, subdivision 2.
Medical
Resource Communication Centers. $683,000 each year is for grants to the
Minnesota Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board for the Metro East and
Metro West Medical Resource Communication Centers that were in operation before
January 1, 2000.
ARMER debt
service.
$6,149,000 the first year and $11,853,000 the second year are to the
commissioner of finance to pay debt service on revenue bonds issued under
Minnesota Statutes, section 403.275.
Any portion of this
appropriation not needed to pay debt service in a fiscal year may be used by
the commissioner of public safety to pay cash for any of the capital improvements
for which bond proceeds were appropriated by Laws 2005, chapter 136, article 1,
section 9, subdivision 8; or in subdivision 8.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2526
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
The base for this appropriation is $18,002,000 in
fiscal year 2010 and $23,261,000 in fiscal year 2011.
Metropolitan Council debt
service.
$1,410,000 each year is to the commissioner of finance for payment to the
Metropolitan Council for debt service on bonds issued under Minnesota Statutes,
section 403.27.
ARMER improvements. $1,000,000 each year is
for the Statewide Radio Board to design, construct, maintain, and improve those
elements of the statewide public safety radio and communication system that
support mutual aid communications and emergency medical services or provide
interim enhancement of public safety communication interoperability in those
areas of the state where the statewide public safety radio and communication
system is not yet implemented.
ARMER interoperability
planning.
$323,000 each year is to provide funding to coordinate and plan for
communication interoperability between public safety entities.
ARMER state backbone
operating costs. $3,110,000 each year is to the commissioner of transportation for
costs of maintaining and operating the first and third phases of the statewide
radio system backbone. The base for this appropriation is $5,060,000 in fiscal
year 2010 and $5,060,000 in fiscal year 2011 to provide funding to operate one
additional phase of the system.
Zone controller. $5,400,000 the first
year is a onetime appropriation to upgrade zone controllers and network
elements in phases one and two of the statewide radio system.
Advance project development. $3,750,000 the first
year is a onetime appropriation for site acquisition and site development work
for the remaining phases of the statewide radio system. This appropriation is
available until June 30, 2010. This appropriation is to the commissioner of
public safety for transfer to the commissioner of transportation.
System
design.
$1,850,000 the first year is a onetime appropriation to complete detailed
design and planning of the remaining phases of the statewide radio system. The
commissioner of public safety and the commissioner of transportation shall
determine the scope of the study, after consulting with the Statewide Radio
Board, the commissioner of administration, and the state chief information officer. The study
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2527
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
must address the system design
for the state backbone and implications for local coverage, how data can be
integrated, and whether other public safety communication networks can be
integrated with the state backbone. The study must estimate the full cost of
completing the state backbone to specified standards, the cost of local
subsystems, and the potential advantages of using a request for proposal
approach to solicit private sector participation in the project. The study must
include a financial analysis of whether the estimated revenue from increasing
the 911 fee by up to 30 cents will cover the estimated debt service of revenue
bonds issued to finance the cost of completing the statewide radio system and a
portion of the cost up to 50 percent for local subsystems. The study must also
review the project organizational structure and governance.
Subd. 8. ARMER
Public Safety 186,000,000
Radio and
communication system. The appropriations in this subdivision are from the 911 revenue
bond proceeds account for the purposes indicated, to be available until the
project is completed or abandoned, subject to Minnesota Statutes, section
16A.642.
The appropriations are to
the commissioner of public safety for transfer to the commissioner of
transportation to construct the system backbone of the public safety radio and
communication system plan under Minnesota Statutes, section 403.36.
$62,000,000 of this
appropriation is for the second year. $62,000,000 of this appropriation is
available on or after July 1, 2009. $62,000,000 of this appropriation is
available on or after July 1, 2010.
The commissioner of public
safety and the commissioner of transportation shall certify to the chairs of
the house Public Safety Finance Division of the Finance Committee and the
senate Public Safety Budget Division of the Finance Committee that the detailed
design has been completed and that the financial analysis finds that sufficient
revenue will be generated by proposed changes in the 911 fee to cover all
estimated debt service on revenue bonds proposed to be issued to complete the
system before the appropriation is made available. The commissioner of finance
shall not approve any fee increase under Minnesota Statutes, section 403.11,
subdivision 1, paragraph (c), until this certification is made.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2528
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Bond sale
authorization. To provide the money appropriated in this subdivision, the
commissioner of finance shall sell and issue bonds of the state in an amount up
to $186,000,000 in the manner, upon the terms, and with the effect prescribed
by Minnesota Statutes, section 403.275.
Sec. 11. PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING
(POST) BOARD $4,287,000 $4,260,000
Excess
amounts transferred. This appropriation is from the peace officer training account in
the special revenue fund. Any new receipts credited to that account in the
first year in excess of $4,287,000 must be transferred and credited to the
general fund. Any new receipts credited to that account in the second year in
excess of $4,260,000 must be transferred and credited to the general fund.
Peace
officer training reimbursements. $3,109,000 the first year and $3,109,000 the
second year are for reimbursements to local governments for peace officer
training costs.
No contact
orders; learning objectives. $50,000 the first year is for: (1) revising and
updating preservice courses and developing in-service training courses related
to no contact orders in domestic violence cases and domestic violence dynamics;
and (2) reimbursing peace officers who have taken training courses described in
clause (1). At a minimum, the training must include instruction in the laws
relating to no contact orders and address how to best coordinate law
enforcement resources relating to no contact orders. In addition, the training
must include a component to instruct peace officers on doing risk assessments
of the escalating factors of lethality in domestic violence cases. The board
must consult with a statewide domestic violence organization in developing
training courses. The board shall utilize a request for proposal process in
awarding training contracts. The recipient of the training contract must
conduct these trainings with advocates or instructors from a statewide domestic
violence organization.
Sec. 12. BOARD OF
PRIVATE DETECTIVES AND
PROTECTIVE AGENT SERVICES $128,000 $130,000
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2529
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Sec. 13. HUMAN RIGHTS
$4,955,000 $3,670,000
Management information
system.
$1,403,000 the first year and $55,000 the second year are for the
replacement of the department's tracking and compliance databases with a
management information system.
Evaluation. The Human Rights
Department shall conduct a survey that evaluates the outcome of complaints
filed with the department and whether or not a charging party is satisfied with
the outcome of a complaint and the process by which the complaint is reviewed
and handled by the department. The department shall evaluate complaints for which
a probable cause or no probable cause determination is made. The survey must
seek to determine the reasons for any dissatisfaction and whether a party
sought an appeal or reconsideration of a determination or decision. The survey
shall evaluate complaints filed or resolved in the past two years. By January
15, 2008, the department shall summarize the survey findings and file a report
with the chairs and ranking minority members of the house and senate committees
having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding that discusses the
findings and any actions the department proposes to undertake in response to
the findings.
Inmate complaints, assaults,
and fatalities; corrections ombudsman; working group; report. By August 1, 2007, the
commissioner of human rights shall convene a working group to study how the
state addresses inmate complaints, assaults, and deaths in county jails,
workhouses, and prisons. The commissioner shall serve as chair of the working
group and invite representatives from the Department of Corrections,
legislature, the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association, the Minnesota Association of
Community Corrections Act counties, state bar association, criminal victims
justice unit, state Council on Black Minnesotans, state Chicano/Latino Affairs
Council, University of Minnesota Law School, Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota,
and other interested parties to participate in the working group. The group
must: (1) assess how state and local units of government currently process and
respond to inmate complaints, assaults, and deaths; (2) assess the
effectiveness of the state's former corrections ombudsman program; (3) study
other states' corrections ombudsmen; (4) study whether the state should conduct
a fatality review process for inmates who die while in custody; and (5) make
recommendations on how state and local units of government should
systematically address inmate complaints, assaults, and deaths, including the
need to re-appoint a corrections ombudsman. The commissioner shall
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2530
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
file a report detailing the group's findings and
recommendations with the chairs and ranking minority members of the house and
senate committees having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding
by January 15, 2008.
Sec. 14. DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation $462,517,000 $483,230,000
Appropriations by Fund
2008 2009
General 461,627,000 482,340,000
Special Revenue 890,000 890,000
The amounts that may be spent for each purpose are
specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Correctional
Institutions 323,511,000 338,577,000
Appropriations by Fund
General 322,931,000 337,997,000
Special Revenue 580,000 580,000
Contracts for beds at Rush
City. If
the commissioner contracts with other states, local units of government, or the
federal government to rent beds in the Rush City Correctional Facility, the
commissioner shall charge a per diem under the contract, to the extent
possible, that is equal to or greater than the per diem cost of housing
Minnesota inmates in the facility.
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the
commissioner may use per diems collected under contracts for beds at MCF-Rush
City to operate the state correctional system.
Offender re-entry services. $400,000 each year is
for increased funding for expansion of offender re-entry services in the
institutions and staffing for the Department of Corrections MCORP program.
Health services. $900,000 the first year
and $1,300,000 the second year are for increases in health services.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2531
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Subd. 3. Community
Services 121,482,000 126,899,000
Appropriations by Fund
General 121,382,000 126,799,000
Special Revenue 100,000 100,000
ISR agents, challenge
incarceration program. $600,000 the first year and $1,000,000 the second year are for
intensive supervised release agents for the challenge incarceration program.
ISR agents, conditional
release program. $600,000 each year is for intensive supervised release agents for
the conditional release program. This is a onetime appropriation.
Interstate compact. $225,000 each year is
for increased costs based on changes made to the Interstate Compact for Adult
Offender Supervision, Minnesota Statutes, section 243.1605.
Sex offenders, civil
commitment and tracking. $350,000 each year is to fund a legal
representative for civil commitments and to manage and track sex offenders.
Probation supervision, CCA
system.
$2,800,000 each year is added to the Community Corrections Act subsidy,
Minnesota Statutes, section 401.14.
Probation supervision, CPO
system.
$600,000 each year is added to the county probation officers reimbursement
base.
Probation supervision, DOC
system.
$600,000 each year is for the Department of Corrections probation and
supervised release unit.
Probation, caseload
reduction.
$1,964,000 the first year and $3,664,000 the second year are for adult felon
offender management to be distributed statewide by the Community Corrections
Act formula. $200,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for
juvenile offender management to be distributed statewide by the Community
Corrections Act formula. These appropriations may be used for sex offender
management.
Sex offender treatment. $500,000 the first year
and $1,000,000 the second year are to increase funding for providing treatment
for sex offenders on community supervision.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2532
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Sex
offender management/standards. $500,000 the first year and $1,000,000 the
second year are for research and evaluation of sex offender management
(supervision, treatment, and polygraphs) and for developing and monitoring
standards of supervision and treatment.
Sex
offender assessments. $75,000 each year is to increase funding to reimburse counties or
their designees, or courts, for sex offender assessments under Minnesota
Statutes, section 609.3457.
Sentencing
to service. $600,000 each year is to increase funding for sentencing to service
activities such as highway litter cleanup.
Short-term
offenders.
$2,500,000 each year is to increase funding for the costs associated with
the housing and care of short-term offenders. The commissioner may use up to 20
percent of the total amount of the appropriation for inpatient medical care for
short-term offenders. All funds remaining at the end of the fiscal year not
expended for inpatient medical care must be added to and distributed with the
housing funds. These funds must be distributed proportionately based on the
total number of days short-term offenders are placed locally, not to exceed $70
per day.
The department is exempt
from the state contracting process for the purposes of paying short-term
offender costs relating to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.105.
Offender
re-entry service. $550,000 each year is for offender job-seeking services,
evidence-based research, expansion of re-entry services specific to juveniles,
and funding to local units of government participating in MCORP to provide
re-entry programming to offenders.
Offender
re-entry grant. $800,000 the first year and $1,700,000 the second year are for
grants to the nonprofit organization selected to administer the five-year
demonstration project for high-risk adults under Minnesota Statutes, section
241.86. This is a onetime appropriation.
Employment
services for ex-offenders. $200,000 each year is for grants to a nonprofit
organization to establish a pilot project to provide employment services to
ex-criminal offenders living in the North Minneapolis community as provided for
in article 7, section 6. This is a onetime appropriation.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2533
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
Domestic abuse re-entry
grants.
$250,000 each year is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner
of corrections for the grant authorized in article 7, section 5. This is a
onetime appropriation.
Re-entry; productive day. $150,000 each year is
appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of corrections for the
fiscal biennium ending June 30, 2009. The commissioner shall distribute the
money as a grant to the Arrowhead Regional Corrections Agency to expand the
agency's productive day initiative program, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
section 241.275, to include juvenile offenders who are 16 years of age and
older. This is a onetime appropriation.
Mentoring grants;
incarcerated parents. $200,000 each year is appropriated from the general fund to the
commissioner of corrections for the grant authorized in Minnesota Statutes,
section 299A.82. This is a onetime appropriation.
Short-term offender study;
report.
The commissioner of corrections shall study the use and effectiveness of the
short-term offender program and identify gaps in the current system relating to
programming and re-entry services for short-term offenders. On or before
January 15, 2008, the commissioner shall submit a report detailing the
commissioner's findings and recommendations to the house and senate committees
with jurisdiction over public safety policy and funding.
Subd. 4. Operations
Support 17,524,000 17,754,000
Appropriations by Fund
General 17,314,000 17,544,000
Special Revenue 210,000 210,000
Sec. 15. SENTENCING
GUIDELINES $600,000 $600,000
Effectiveness of re-entry
programs and drug courts; study. The Sentencing Guidelines Commission, in
consultation with the commissioner of corrections and the state court
administrator, shall study: (1) the effectiveness of the offender re-entry
funding and programs authorized in this act; and (2) the effectiveness of the
additional drug courts funded in this act. The executive director of the
commission shall file a report with the ranking members of the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2534
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2008 2009
over public safety policy and
funding by February 15, 2009. The report must assess the impact this act's
re-entry grants and programs and expanded drug court funding had on the
recidivism rate of offenders who participated in: (1) programs that received
re-entry grants; and/or (2) drug courts.
ARTICLE 2
GENERAL CRIME
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 518B.01, subdivision 22, is amended to read:
Subd. 22. Domestic abuse no contact order. (a) A
domestic abuse no contact order is an order issued by a court against a defendant
in a criminal proceeding for:
(1) domestic abuse;
(2) harassment or stalking
charged under section 609.749 and committed against a family or household
member;
(3) violation of an order
for protection charged under subdivision 14; or
(4) violation of a prior
domestic abuse no contact order charged under this subdivision.
It includes pretrial orders
before final disposition of the case and probationary orders after sentencing.
(b) A person who knows of
the existence of a domestic abuse no contact order issued against the person
and violates the order is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(c) A person is guilty of a
gross misdemeanor who knowingly violates this subdivision within ten years of a
previous qualified domestic violence-related offense conviction or adjudication
of delinquency. Upon a gross misdemeanor conviction under this paragraph,
the defendant must be sentenced to a minimum of ten days' imprisonment and must
be ordered to participate in counseling or other appropriate programs selected
by the court as provided in section 518B.02. Notwithstanding section 609.135,
the court must impose and execute the minimum sentence provided in this
paragraph for gross misdemeanor convictions.
(d) A person is guilty of a
felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to
payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person knowingly
violates this subdivision within ten years of the first of two or more previous
qualified domestic violence-related offense convictions or adjudications of
delinquency. Upon a felony conviction under this paragraph in which the court
stays imposition or execution of sentence, the court shall impose at least a
30-day period of incarceration as a condition of probation. The court also
shall order that the defendant participate in counseling or other appropriate
programs selected by the court. Notwithstanding section 609.135, the court must
impose and execute the minimum sentence provided in this paragraph for felony
convictions.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2535
(d) (e) A peace officer shall
arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer
has probable cause to believe has violated a domestic abuse no contact order,
even if the violation of the order did not take place in the presence of the
peace officer, if the existence of the order can be verified by the officer.
The person shall be held in custody for at least 36 hours, excluding the day of
arrest, Sundays, and holidays, unless the person is released earlier by a judge
or judicial officer. A peace officer acting in good faith and exercising due
care in making an arrest pursuant to this paragraph is immune from civil
liability that might result from the officer's actions.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.02, subdivision 16, is amended to read:
Subd. 16. Qualified domestic violence-related
offense. "Qualified domestic violence-related offense" includes a
violation of or an attempt to violate the following offenses: sections
518B.01, subdivision 14 (violation of domestic abuse order for protection);
518B.01, subdivision 22 (violation of domestic abuse no contact order); 609.185
(first-degree murder); 609.19 (second-degree murder); 609.221 (first-degree
assault); 609.222 (second-degree assault); 609.223 (third-degree assault);
609.2231 (fourth-degree assault); 609.224 (fifth-degree assault); 609.2242
(domestic assault); 609.2247 (domestic assault by strangulation); 609.342
(first-degree criminal sexual conduct); 609.343 (second-degree criminal sexual
conduct); 609.344 (third-degree criminal sexual conduct); 609.345 (fourth-degree
criminal sexual conduct); 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.713
(terroristic threats); 609.748, subdivision 6 (violation of harassment
restraining order); 609.749 (harassment/stalking); and 609.78, subdivision 2
(interference with an emergency call); and similar laws of other states, the
United States, the District of Columbia, tribal lands, and United States
territories.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.341, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Sexual contact. (a) "Sexual
contact," for the purposes of sections 609.343, subdivision 1, clauses (a)
to (f), and 609.345, subdivision 1, clauses (a) to (e), and (h) to (m)
(o), includes any of the following acts committed without the complainant's
consent, except in those cases where consent is not a defense, and committed
with sexual or aggressive intent:
(i) the intentional touching
by the actor of the complainant's intimate parts, or
(ii) the touching by the
complainant of the actor's, the complainant's, or another's intimate parts
effected by a person in a position of authority, or by coercion, or by
inducement if the complainant is under 13 years of age or mentally impaired, or
(iii) the touching by
another of the complainant's intimate parts effected by coercion or by a person
in a position of authority, or
(iv) in any of the cases
above, the touching of the clothing covering the immediate area of the intimate
parts.
(b) "Sexual
contact," for the purposes of sections 609.343, subdivision 1, clauses (g)
and (h), and 609.345, subdivision 1, clauses (f) and (g), includes any of the
following acts committed with sexual or aggressive intent:
(i) the intentional touching
by the actor of the complainant's intimate parts;
(ii) the touching by the
complainant of the actor's, the complainant's, or another's intimate parts;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2536
(iii) the touching by
another of the complainant's intimate parts; or
(iv) in any of the cases
listed above, touching of the clothing covering the immediate area of the
intimate parts.
(c) "Sexual contact
with a person under 13" means the intentional touching of the
complainant's bare genitals or anal opening by the actor's bare genitals or
anal opening with sexual or aggressive intent or the touching by the
complainant's bare genitals or anal opening of the actor's or another's bare
genitals or anal opening with sexual or aggressive intent.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.344, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person who engages in
sexual penetration with another person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in
the third degree if any of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the complainant is under
13 years of age and the actor is no more than 36 months older than the
complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act
by the complainant shall be a defense;
(b) the complainant is at
least 13 but less than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 24 months
older than the complainant. In any such case if the actor is no more than
120 months older than the complainant, it shall be an affirmative defense,
which must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence, that the actor
reasonably believes the complainant to be 16 years of age or older. In
all other cases, mistake as to the complainant's age shall not be a defense. If
the actor in such a case is no more than 48 months but more than 24 months
older than the complainant, the actor may be sentenced to imprisonment for not
more than five years. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(c) the actor uses force or
coercion to accomplish the penetration;
(d) the actor knows or has
reason to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally
incapacitated, or physically helpless;
(e) the complainant is at
least 16 but less than 18 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months
older than the complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the
complainant is a defense;
(f) the actor has a
significant relationship to the complainant and the complainant was at least 16
but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual penetration. Neither
mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant
is a defense;
(g) the actor has a
significant relationship to the complainant, the complainant was at least 16
but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual penetration, and:
(i) the actor or an
accomplice used force or coercion to accomplish the penetration;
(ii) the complainant
suffered personal injury; or
(iii) the sexual abuse
involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's
age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2537
(h) the actor is a
psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient of the psychotherapist and the
sexual penetration occurred:
(i) during the psychotherapy
session; or
(ii) outside the
psychotherapy session if an ongoing psychotherapist-patient relationship
exists.
Consent by the complainant
is not a defense;
(i) the actor is a
psychotherapist and the complainant is a former patient of the psychotherapist
and the former patient is emotionally dependent upon the psychotherapist;
(j) the actor is a
psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient or former patient and the
sexual penetration occurred by means of therapeutic deception. Consent by the
complainant is not a defense;
(k) the actor accomplishes
the sexual penetration by means of deception or false representation that the
penetration is for a bona fide medical purpose. Consent by the complainant is
not a defense;
(1) the actor is or purports
to be a member of the clergy, the complainant is not married to the actor, and:
(i) the sexual penetration
occurred during the course of a meeting in which the complainant sought or
received religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort from the actor in
private; or
(ii) the sexual penetration
occurred during a period of time in which the complainant was meeting on an
ongoing basis with the actor to seek or receive religious or spiritual advice, aid,
or comfort in private. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(m) the actor is an
employee, independent contractor, or volunteer of a state, county, city, or
privately operated adult or juvenile correctional system, including, but not
limited to, jails, prisons, detention centers, or work release facilities, and
the complainant is a resident of a facility or under supervision of the
correctional system. Consent by the complainant is not a defense; or
(n) the actor provides or is
an agent of an entity that provides special transportation service, the
complainant used the special transportation service, and the sexual penetration
occurred during or immediately before or after the actor transported the
complainant. Consent by the complainant is not a defense.; or
(o) the actor performs
massage or other bodywork for hire, the complainant was a user of one of those
services, and nonconsensual sexual penetration occurred during or immediately
before or after the actor performed or was hired to perform one of those
services for the complainant.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.345, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person who engages in
sexual contact with another person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the
fourth degree if any of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the complainant is under
13 years of age and the actor is no more than 36 months older than the
complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age or consent to the act
by the complainant is a defense. In a prosecution under this clause, the state
is not required to prove that the sexual contact was coerced;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2538
(b) the complainant is at
least 13 but less than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months
older than the complainant or in a position of authority over the complainant.
Consent by the complainant to the act is not a defense. In any such case, if
the actor is no more than 120 months older than the complainant, it shall
be an affirmative defense which must be proved by a preponderance of the
evidence that the actor reasonably believes the complainant to be 16
years of age or older. In all other cases, mistake as to the complainant's
age shall not be a defense;
(c) the actor uses force or
coercion to accomplish the sexual contact;
(d) the actor knows or has reason
to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or
physically helpless;
(e) the complainant is at
least 16 but less than 18 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months
older than the complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the
complainant is a defense;
(f) the actor has a
significant relationship to the complainant and the complainant was at least 16
but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual contact. Neither mistake as
to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a
defense;
(g) the actor has a
significant relationship to the complainant, the complainant was at least 16
but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual contact, and:
(i) the actor or an
accomplice used force or coercion to accomplish the contact;
(ii) the complainant
suffered personal injury; or
(iii) the sexual abuse
involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the
complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(h) the actor is a
psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient of the psychotherapist and the
sexual contact occurred:
(i) during the psychotherapy
session; or
(ii) outside the
psychotherapy session if an ongoing psychotherapist-patient relationship
exists. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(i) the actor is a
psychotherapist and the complainant is a former patient of the psychotherapist
and the former patient is emotionally dependent upon the psychotherapist;
(j) the actor is a
psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient or former patient and the
sexual contact occurred by means of therapeutic deception. Consent by the complainant
is not a defense;
(k) the actor accomplishes
the sexual contact by means of deception or false representation that the
contact is for a bona fide medical purpose. Consent by the complainant is not a
defense;
(1) the actor is or purports
to be a member of the clergy, the complainant is not married to the actor, and:
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2539
(i) the sexual contact
occurred during the course of a meeting in which the complainant sought or
received religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort from the actor in
private; or
(ii) the sexual contact
occurred during a period of time in which the complainant was meeting on an
ongoing basis with the actor to seek or receive religious or spiritual advice,
aid, or comfort in private. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(m) the actor is an
employee, independent contractor, or volunteer of a state, county, city, or
privately operated adult or juvenile correctional system, including, but not
limited to, jails, prisons, detention centers, or work release facilities, and
the complainant is a resident of a facility or under supervision of the
correctional system. Consent by the complainant is not a defense; or
(n) the actor provides or is
an agent of an entity that provides special transportation service, the
complainant used the special transportation service, the complainant is not
married to the actor, and the sexual contact occurred during or immediately
before or after the actor transported the complainant. Consent by the
complainant is not a defense.; or
(o) the actor performs
massage or other bodywork for hire, the complainant was a user of one of those
services, and nonconsensual sexual contact occurred during or immediately
before or after the actor performed or was hired to perform one of those
services for the complainant.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.3451, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Felony. A person is guilty of a felony
and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment
of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person violates subdivision
1, clause (2) this section, after having been previously convicted
of or adjudicated delinquent for violating subdivision 1, clause (2)
this section; sections 609.342 to 609.345; section 609.3453; section
617.23, subdivision 2, clause (1); section 617.247; or a statute from
another state in conformity with subdivision 1, clause (2), or section
617.23, subdivision 2, clause (1) with one of these statutes.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.3455, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Mandatory life sentence; repeat offenders.
(a) Notwithstanding the statutory maximum penalty otherwise applicable to the
offense, the court shall sentence a person to imprisonment for life if the
person is convicted of violating section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or
609.3453 and:
(1) the person has two
previous sex offense convictions;
(2) the person has a previous
sex offense conviction and:
(i) the factfinder
determines that the present offense involved an aggravating factor that would
provide grounds for an upward durational departure under the sentencing
guidelines other than the aggravating factor applicable to repeat criminal
sexual conduct convictions;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2540
(ii) the person received an
upward durational departure from the sentencing guidelines for the previous sex
offense conviction; or
(iii) the person was
sentenced under this section or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.108, for
the previous sex offense conviction; or
(3) the person has two prior
sex offense convictions, and the factfinder determines that the prior convictions
and present offense involved at least three separate victims, and:
(i) the factfinder
determines that the present offense involved an aggravating factor that would
provide grounds for an upward durational departure under the sentencing
guidelines other than the aggravating factor applicable to repeat criminal
sexual conduct convictions;
(ii) the person received an
upward durational departure from the sentencing guidelines for one of the prior
sex offense convictions; or
(iii) the person was sentenced
under this section or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.108, for one of the
prior sex offense convictions.
(b) Notwithstanding
paragraph (a), a court may not sentence a person to imprisonment for life for a
violation of section 609.345, unless at least one of the person's
previous or prior sex offense convictions that are being used as the basis for
the sentence are for violations of section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, or
609.3453, or any similar statute of the United States, this state, or any other
state.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.3455, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 9. Applicability. The provisions of this section do not
affect the applicability of Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.108, to crimes
committed before August 1, 2005, or the validity of sentences imposed under
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.108.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.352, is amended to read:
609.352 SOLICITATION OF CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL CONDUCT.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. As used in this section:
(a) "child" means
a person 15 years of age or younger;
(b) "sexual
conduct" means sexual contact of the individual's primary genital area,
sexual penetration as defined in section 609.341, or sexual performance as
defined in section 617.246; and
(c) "solicit"
means commanding, entreating, or attempting to persuade a specific person in
person, by telephone, by letter, or by computerized or other electronic means.;
and
(d) "sexually
explicit" means any communication, language, or material, including a
photographic or video image, that relates to or describes sexual conduct.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2541
Subd. 2. Prohibited act. A person 18 years of
age or older who solicits a child or someone the person reasonably believes is
a child to engage in sexual conduct with intent to engage in sexual conduct is
guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than
three years, or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.
Subd. 2a. Internet or computer solicitation of children. A person
18 years of age or older who uses the Internet or a computer, computer program,
computer network, or computer system to communicate with a child or someone the
person reasonably believes is a child, with the intent to arouse or gratify the
sexual desire of any person, is guilty of a felony if any of the following
circumstances exist:
(a) the actor solicits a
child or someone the actor reasonably believes is a child to engage in sexual
conduct;
(b) the actor communicates
in a sexually explicit manner with a child or someone the actor reasonably
believes is a child; or
(c) the actor distributes
sexually explicit material to a child or someone the actor reasonably believes
is a child.
Subd. 2b. Jurisdiction. A person may be convicted of an offense
under subdivision 2a if the transmission that constitutes the offense either
originates within this state or is received within this state.
Subd. 3. Defenses. (a) Mistake as to age
is not a defense to a prosecution under this section subdivision 2.
Mistake as to age is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under
subdivision 2a.
(b) The fact that an
undercover operative or law enforcement officer was involved in the detection
or investigation of an offense under this section does not constitute a defense
to a prosecution under this section.
Subd. 4. Penalty. A person convicted under subdivision 2 or 2a is
guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than three
years, or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.505, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Reporting police misconduct. (a)
Whoever informs, or causes information to be communicated to, a peace officer,
whose responsibilities include investigating or reporting police misconduct,
or other person working under the authority of a chief law enforcement officer,
whose responsibilities include investigating or reporting police misconduct,
that a peace officer, as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph
(c), has committed an act of police misconduct, knowing that the information is
false, is guilty of a crime and may be sentenced as follows:
(1) up to the maximum
provided for a misdemeanor if the false information does not allege a criminal
act; or
(2) up to the maximum provided
for a gross misdemeanor if the false information alleges a criminal act.
(b) The court shall order
any person convicted of a violation of this subdivision to make full
restitution of all reasonable expenses incurred in the investigation of the false
allegation unless the court makes a specific written finding that restitution
would be inappropriate under the circumstances. A restitution award may not
exceed $3,000.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2542
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.535, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Penalties. (a) A person who is
convicted of issuing a dishonored check under subdivision 2 may be sentenced as
follows:
(1) to imprisonment for not
more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both,
if the value of the dishonored check, or checks aggregated under paragraph (b),
is more than $500 $1,000;
(2) to imprisonment for not
more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both, if
the value of the dishonored check, or checks aggregated under paragraph (b), is
more than $250 $500 but not more than $500 $1,000;
or
(3) to imprisonment for not
more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both, if
the value of the dishonored check, or checks aggregated under paragraph (b), is
not more than $250 $500.
(b) In a prosecution under
this subdivision, the value of dishonored checks issued by the defendant in
violation of this subdivision within any six-month period may be aggregated and
the defendant charged accordingly in applying this section. When two or more
offenses are committed by the same person in two or more counties, the accused
may be prosecuted in any county in which one of the dishonored checks was
issued for all of the offenses aggregated under this paragraph.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.581, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Government building. "Government building"
means a building that is owned, leased, controlled, or operated by a
governmental entity for a governmental purpose.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.581, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Religious establishment. "Religious
establishment" means a building used for worship services by a religious
organization and clearly identified as such by a posted sign or other means.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.581, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. School building. "School building" means a
public or private preschool, elementary school, middle school, secondary
school, or postsecondary school building.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.581, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8. Historic property. "Historic property" means
any property identified as a historic site or historic place by sections
138.661 to 138.664 and clearly identified as such by a posted sign or other
means.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2543
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.582, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Burglary in the second degree. (a) Whoever
enters a building without consent and with intent to commit a crime, or enters
a building without consent and commits a crime while in the building, either
directly or as an accomplice, commits burglary in the second degree and may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine
of not more than $20,000, or both, if:
(a) (1) the building is a dwelling;
(b) (2) the portion of the building
entered contains a banking business or other business of receiving securities
or other valuable papers for deposit or safekeeping and the entry is with force
or threat of force;
(c) (3) the portion of the building
entered contains a pharmacy or other lawful business or practice in which
controlled substances are routinely held or stored, and the entry is forcible;
or
(d) (4) when entering or while in
the building, the burglar possesses a tool to gain access to money or property.
(b) Whoever enters a
government building, religious establishment, historic property, or school
building without consent and with intent to commit a crime under section 609.52
or 609.595, or enters a government building, religious establishment, historic
property, or school building without consent and commits a crime under section
609.52 or 609.595 while in the building, either directly or as an accomplice,
commits burglary in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for
not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or
both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec.
17. [609.593] DAMAGE OR THEFT TO
ENERGY TRANSMISSION OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT.
Subdivision 1. Crime. Whoever intentionally and without consent from one
authorized to give consent causes any damage or takes, removes, severs, or
breaks:
(1) any line erected or
maintained for the purpose of transmitting electricity for light, heat, or
power, or any insulator or cross-arm, appurtenance or apparatus connected
therewith, any wire, cable, or current thereof;
(2) any pipe or main or
hazardous liquid pipeline erected, operated, or maintained for the purpose of
transporting, conveying, or distributing gas or other hazardous liquids for
light, heat, power, or any other purpose, or any part thereof, or any valve,
meter, holder, compressor, machinery, appurtenance, equipment, or apparatus
connected with any such main or pipeline; or
(3) any machinery,
equipment, and fixtures used in receiving, initiating, amplifying, processing,
transmitting, retransmitting, recording, switching, or monitoring
telecommunications services, such as computers, transformers, amplifiers,
routers, repeaters, multiplexers, and other items performing comparable
functions; and machinery, equipment, and fixtures used in the transportation of
telecommunications services, radio transmitters and receivers, satellite
equipment, microwave equipment, and other transporting media including wire,
cable, fiber, poles, and conduit;
is guilty of a crime and may
be sentenced as provided in subdivision 2.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2544
Subd. 2. Penalty. Whoever violates subdivision 1 is guilty of a
felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to
payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
Sec. 18. [609.5935] TAMPERING WITH GAS AND
ELECTRICAL LINES.
Whoever intentionally and
without claim of right, takes, removes, breaks, or severs, a line or any part
connected to a line that is used for supplying or transporting gas or
electricity without the consent of one authorized to give consent and in a
manner that creates a substantial risk of death or bodily harm or serious
property damage is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for
not more than 20 years or to payment of a fine of not more than $100,000, or
both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.595, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Criminal damage to property in the first
degree. Whoever intentionally causes damage to physical property of another
without the latter's consent may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than
five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if:
(1) the damage to the
property caused a reasonably foreseeable risk of bodily harm; or
(2) the property damaged
belongs to a common carrier and the damage impairs the service to the public
rendered by the carrier; or
(3) the damage reduces the
value of the property by more than $500 $1,000 measured by the
cost of repair and replacement; or
(4) the damage reduces the
value of the property by more than $250 $500 measured by the cost
of repair and replacement and the defendant has been convicted within the
preceding three years of an offense under this subdivision or subdivision 2.
In any prosecution under
clause (3), the value of any property damaged by the defendant in violation of
that clause within any six-month period may be aggregated and the defendant
charged accordingly in applying the provisions of this section; provided that
when two or more offenses are committed by the same person in two or more counties,
the accused may be prosecuted in any county in which one of the offenses was
committed for all of the offenses aggregated under this paragraph.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.595, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Criminal damage to property in the third
degree. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 1a, whoever
intentionally causes damage to another person's physical property without the
other person's consent may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one
year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both, if the damage
reduces the value of the property by more than $250 $500 but not
more than $500 $1,000 as measured by the cost of repair and
replacement.
(b) Whoever intentionally
causes damage to another person's physical property without the other person's
consent because of the property owner's or another's actual or perceived race,
color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability as defined in section
363A.03, age, or national origin may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more
than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both, if the
damage reduces the value of the property by not more than $250 $500.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2545
(c) In any prosecution under
paragraph (a), the value of property damaged by the defendant in violation of
that paragraph within any six-month period may be aggregated and the defendant
charged accordingly in applying this section. When two or more offenses are
committed by the same person in two or more counties, the accused may be
prosecuted in any county in which one of the offenses was committed for all of
the offenses aggregated under this paragraph.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.748, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definition. For the purposes of this
section, the following terms have the meanings given them in this subdivision.
(a) "Harassment"
includes:
(1) a single incident of physical
or sexual assault or repeated incidents of intrusive or unwanted acts, words,
or gestures that have a substantial adverse effect or are intended to have a
substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of another,
regardless of the relationship between the actor and the intended target;
(2) targeted residential
picketing; and
(3) a pattern of attending
public events after being notified that the actor's presence at the event is
harassing to another.; and
(4) a single incident of posing
as another person or persons through the use of the Internet or a computer,
computer program, computer network, or computer system, without express
authorization in order to harass or defame another person or persons.
(b) "Respondent"
includes any adults or juveniles alleged to have engaged in harassment or
organizations alleged to have sponsored or promoted harassment.
(c) "Targeted
residential picketing" includes the following acts when committed on more
than one occasion:
(1) marching, standing, or
patrolling by one or more persons directed solely at a particular residential
building in a manner that adversely affects the safety, security, or privacy of
an occupant of the building; or
(2) marching, standing, or
patrolling by one or more persons which prevents an occupant of a residential
building from gaining access to or exiting from the property on which the
residential building is located.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.748, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Restraining order. (a) The court may
grant a restraining order ordering the respondent to cease or avoid the
harassment of another person or to have no contact with that person if all of
the following occur:
(1) the petitioner has filed
a petition under subdivision 3;
(2) the sheriff has served
respondent with a copy of the temporary restraining order obtained under
subdivision 4, and with notice of the right to request a hearing, or service
has been made by publication under subdivision 3, paragraph (b); and
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2546
(3) the court finds at the hearing
that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has engaged in
harassment.
Except as provided in
paragraph (c), a restraining order may be issued only against the respondent named in
the petition; except that and if the respondent is an
organization, the order may be issued against and apply to all of the members
of the organization. Relief granted by the restraining order must be for a
fixed period of not more than two years. When a referee presides at the hearing
on the petition, the restraining order becomes effective upon the referee's
signature.
(b) An order issued under
this subdivision must be personally served upon the respondent.
(c) If the harassment
involves communication through the use of the Internet or a computer, computer
program, computer network, or computer system, a restraining order may also be
issued against private computer networks, including Internet service providers
or computer bulletin board systems, that are publishing harassing information.
A restraining order issued under this paragraph may direct the respondent or a
private computer network to remove or correct the harassing information. A
restraining order issued under this paragraph may be served by mail upon any
private computer network affected.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 23. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006,
section 609.805, is repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
ARTICLE 3
DWI AND DRIVING RELATED
PROVISIONS
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 169A.275, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. Exception. (a) A judge is not required to sentence a person
as provided in this section if the judge requires the person as a condition of
probation to drive only motor vehicles equipped with an ignition interlock
device meeting the standards described in section 171.306.
(b) This subdivision expires
July 1, 2009.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 169A.51, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Requirements for conducting tests; liability.
(a) Only a physician, medical technician, emergency medical
technician-paramedic, registered nurse, medical technologist, medical
laboratory technician, phlebotomist, or laboratory assistant acting at
the request of a peace officer may withdraw blood for the purpose of
determining the presence of alcohol, a controlled substance or its metabolite,
or a hazardous substance. This limitation does not apply to the taking of a
breath or urine sample.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2547
(b) The person tested has
the right to have someone of the person's own choosing administer a chemical
test or tests in addition to any administered at the direction of a peace
officer; provided, that the additional test sample on behalf of the person is
obtained at the place where the person is in custody, after the test
administered at the direction of a peace officer, and at no expense to the
state. The failure or inability to obtain an additional test or tests by a
person does not preclude the admission in evidence of the test taken at the
direction of a peace officer unless the additional test was prevented or denied
by the peace officer.
(c) The physician, medical
technician, emergency medical technician-paramedic, medical technologist,
medical laboratory technician, laboratory assistant, phlebotomist, or
registered nurse drawing blood at the request of a peace officer for the
purpose of determining the concentration of alcohol, a controlled substance or
its metabolite, or a hazardous substance is in no manner liable in any civil or
criminal action except for negligence in drawing the blood. The person
administering a breath test must be fully trained in the administration of
breath tests pursuant to training given by the commissioner of public safety.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment and applies to crimes committed on
or after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 171.12, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 9. Driving record disclosure to law enforcement. The
commissioner shall also furnish driving records, without charge, to chiefs of
police, county sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, and other law enforcement
agencies with the power to arrest.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 4. [171.306] IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE PILOT PROJECT.
Subdivision 1. Pilot project established; reports. The commissioner
shall conduct a two-year ignition interlock device pilot project as provided in
this section. The commissioner shall select one metropolitan county and one
rural county to participate in the pilot project. The pilot project must begin
on July 1, 2007, and continue until June 30, 2009. The commissioner shall
submit two preliminary reports by February 1, 2008, and by December 1, 2008,
and a final report by September 1, 2009, to the chairs and ranking minority
members of the senate and house of representatives committees having
jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding. The reports must
evaluate the successes and failures of the pilot project, provide information
on participation rates, and make recommendations on continuing the project.
Subd. 2. Performance standards; certification. The commissioner
shall determine appropriate performance standards and a certification process
for ignition interlock devices for the pilot project. Only devices certified by
the commissioner as meeting the performance standards may be used in the pilot
project.
Subd. 3. Pilot project components. (a) Under the pilot project,
the commissioner shall issue a driver's license to an individual whose driver's
license has been revoked under chapter 169A for a repeat impaired driving
incident if the person qualifies under this section and agrees to all of the
conditions of the project.
(b) The commissioner must
flag the person's driver's license record to indicate the person's
participation in the program. The license must authorize the person to drive
only vehicles having functioning ignition interlock devices conforming with the
requirements of subdivision 2.
(c) Notwithstanding any
statute or rule to the contrary, the commissioner has authority to and shall
determine the appropriate period for which a person participating in the ignition
interlock pilot program shall be subject to this program, and when the person
is eligible to be issued:
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2548
(1) a limited driver's
license subject to the ignition interlock restriction;
(2) full driving privileges
subject to the ignition interlock restriction; and
(3) a driver's license
without an ignition interlock restriction.
(d) A person participating in
this pilot project shall agree to participate in any treatment recommended by a
chemical use assessment.
(e) The commissioner shall
determine guidelines for participation in the project. A person participating
in the project shall sign a written agreement accepting these guidelines and
agreeing to comply with them.
(f) It is a misdemeanor for
a person who is licensed under this section for driving a vehicle equipped with
an ignition interlock device:
(1) to start or attempt to
start, or to operate or attempt to operate, the vehicle while the person has
any amount of alcohol in the person's body; or
(2) to drive, operate or be
in physical control of a motor vehicle other than a vehicle properly equipped
with an ignition interlock device.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 171.55, is amended to read:
171.55 OUT-OF-STATE CONVICTIONS GIVEN EFFECT.
The commissioner shall give
the same effect for driver licensing purposes to conduct reported from a
licensing authority or court in another state or province or territory of
Canada that the commissioner would give to conduct reported from a court or
other agency of this state, whether or not the other state or province or
territory of Canada is a party to the Driver License Compact in section
171.50. The conduct to be given effect by the commissioner includes a report of
conviction for an offense enumerated in section 171.50, article IV, or an
offense described in sections 171.17 and 171.18.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.21, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Criminal vehicular homicide
operation; crime described. A person is guilty of criminal vehicular homicide
resulting in death and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten
years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both
operation and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 1a, if the person
causes injury to or the death of a human being not constituting
murder or manslaughter another as a result of operating a motor
vehicle:
(1) in a grossly negligent
manner;
(2) in a negligent manner
while under the influence of:
(i) alcohol;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2549
(ii) a controlled substance;
or
(iii) any combination of
those elements;
(3) while having an alcohol
concentration of 0.08 or more;
(4) while having an alcohol
concentration of 0.08 or more, as measured within two hours of the time of
driving;
(5) in a negligent manner
while knowingly under the influence of a hazardous substance;
(6) in a negligent manner
while any amount of a controlled substance listed in schedule I or II, or
its metabolite, other than marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, is present
in the person's body; or
(7) where the driver who
causes the accident leaves the scene of the accident in violation of section 169.09,
subdivision 1 or 6.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.21, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. Criminal penalties. (a) A person who violates subdivision
1 and causes the death of a human being not constituting murder or manslaughter
or the death of an unborn child may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more
than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.
(b) A person who violates
subdivision 1 and causes great bodily harm to another not constituting
attempted murder or assault or great bodily harm to an unborn child who is
subsequently born alive may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five
years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(c) A person who violates
subdivision 1 and causes substantial bodily harm to another may be sentenced to
imprisonment for not more than three years or to payment of a fine of not more
than $10,000, or both.
(d) A person who violates
subdivision 1 and causes bodily harm to another may be sentenced to
imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more
than $3,000, or both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.21, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1b. Conviction not bar to punishment for other crimes. A
prosecution for or a conviction of a crime under this section relating to
causing death or injury to an unborn child is not a bar to conviction of or
punishment for any other crime committed by the defendant as part of the same
conduct.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2550
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.21, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Affirmative defense. It shall be an
affirmative defense to a charge under subdivision 1, clause (6); 2, clause
(6); 2a, clause (6); 2b, clause (6); 3, clause (6); or 4, clause (6), that
the defendant used the controlled substance according to the terms of a
prescription issued for the defendant in accordance with sections 152.11 and
152.12.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.21, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Definitions. For purposes of this
section, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(a) "Motor
vehicle" has the meaning given in section 609.52, subdivision 1, and
includes attached trailers.
(b) "Controlled
substance" has the meaning given in section 152.01, subdivision 4.
(c) "Hazardous
substance" means any chemical or chemical compound that is listed as a
hazardous substance in rules adopted under chapter 182.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to crimes committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 634.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Certificates of analysis; blood sample
reports; chain of custody. (a) In any hearing or trial of a criminal
offense or petty misdemeanor or proceeding pursuant to section 169A.53,
subdivision 3, the following documents shall be admissible in evidence:
(a) (1) a report of the facts and
results of any laboratory analysis or examination if it is prepared and
attested by the person performing the laboratory analysis or examination in any
laboratory operated by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension or authorized by the
bureau to conduct an analysis or examination, or in any laboratory of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, the federal Postal Inspection Service, the
federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, or the federal Drug
Enforcement Administration;
(b) (2) a report of a blood sample
withdrawn under the implied consent law if:
(i) The report was prepared
by the person who administered the test;
(ii) The person who withdrew
the blood sample was competent to administer the test under section 169A.51,
subdivision 7; and
(iii) The report was prepared
consistent with any applicable rules promulgated by the commissioner of public
safety; and
(c) (3) a verified chain of custody
of a specimen while under the control of a laboratory described in clause (a) (1).
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2551
(b) A report described in paragraph
(a), clause (a) (1), purported to be signed by the person
performing the analysis or examination in a laboratory named in that clause, or
a blood sample report described in paragraph (a), clause (b)
(2), purported to be signed by the person who withdrew the blood sample
shall be admissible as evidence without proof of the seal, signature or
official character of the person whose name is signed to it. The signature in paragraph
(a), clause (a) (1) or (b) (2), can be written
or in electronic format.
(c) At least 20 days before
trial, the prosecutor shall submit to the accused person or the accused
person's attorney notice of the contents of a report described in paragraph (a)
and of the requirements of subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 634.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Testimony at trial. (a) Except
in civil proceedings, including proceedings under section 169A.53, an accused
person or the accused person's attorney may request, by notifying the
prosecuting attorney at least ten days before the trial, that the following
persons testify in person at the trial on behalf of the state:
(a) (1) a person who performed the
laboratory analysis or examination for the report described in subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), clause (a) (1); or
(b) (2) a person who prepared the
blood sample report described in subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (b)
(2).
If a petitioner in a
proceeding under section 169A.53 subpoenas a person described in paragraph
(a) clause (1) or (b) (2), to testify at the
proceeding, the petitioner is not required to pay the person witness fees under
section 357.22 in excess of $100.
(b) If the accused person or
the accused person's attorney does not comply with the ten-day requirement
described in paragraph (a), the prosecutor is not required to produce the person
who performed the analysis or examination or prepared the report. In this case,
the accused person's right to confront that witness is waived and the report
shall be admitted into evidence.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 13. REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.
(a) In Minnesota Statutes,
sections 171.3215, subdivision 2a; and 609.135, subdivision 2, the revisor of
statutes shall change the references in column A to the references in column B.
Column
A Column
B
609.21,
subdivision 1 609.21,
subdivision 1a, paragraph (a)
609.21,
subdivision 2 609.21,
subdivision 1a, paragraph (b)
609.21,
subdivision 2a 609.21,
subdivision 1a, paragraph (c)
609.21,
subdivision 2b 609.21,
subdivision 1a, paragraph (d)
609.21,
subdivision 4 609.21,
subdivision 1a, paragraph (b)
(b) In Minnesota Statutes, section 609.035, subdivision 1, the revisor
of statutes shall replace the reference to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.21,
subdivisions 3 and 4, with a reference to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.21,
subdivision 1b.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2552
(c) In Minnesota Statutes, section 609.266, the revisor of statutes shall
replace the reference to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.21, subdivisions 3 and
4, with a reference to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.21, subdivision 1a,
paragraphs (a) and (b).
(d) In Minnesota Statutes, section 169A.03, subdivisions 20 and 21, and
Minnesota Statutes, section 169A.24, subdivision 1, the revisor of statutes
shall strike the references to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.21, subdivision
2, clauses (2) to (6); subdivision 2a, clauses (2) to (6); subdivision 2b,
clauses (2) to (6); subdivision 3, clauses (2) to (6); and subdivision 4,
clauses (2) to (6).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007.
Sec. 14. REPEALER.
Subdivision 1. Verify auto insurance.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 169.796, subdivision 3, is repealed.
Subd. 2. Suspension of mailed
demands. Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 6, article 3,
section 91, is repealed.
Subd. 3. Criminal vehicular
operation. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 609.21, subdivisions 2,
2a, 2b, 3, and 4, are repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. Subdivisions 1 and 2 are
effective the day following final enactment. Subdivision 3 is effective August
1, 2007.
ARTICLE 4
CRIME VICTIMS
Section 1. [299A.786] LEGAL
ADVOCACY TRAFFICKING VICTIMS; GRANT.
(a) The commissioner of public safety shall award a grant for ten
weekly international trafficking screening clinics that are staffed by
attorneys from a nonprofit organization that provides free legal, medical,
dental, mental health, shelter, and vocational counseling services and English
language classes to trafficking victims in the state.
(b) The grant applicant shall prepare and submit to the commissioner of
public safety a written grant proposal detailing the screening clinic free
services, including components of the services offered.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 363A.06, subdivision 1, is
amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Formulation of
policies. (a) The commissioner shall formulate policies to
effectuate the purposes of this chapter and shall:
(1) exercise leadership under the direction of the governor in the
development of human rights policies and programs, and make recommendations to
the governor and the legislature for their consideration and implementation;
(2) establish and maintain a principal office in St. Paul, and any
other necessary branch offices at any location within the state;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2553
(3) meet and function at any
place within the state;
(4) employ attorneys,
clerks, and other employees and agents as the commissioner may deem necessary
and prescribe their duties;
(5) to the extent permitted
by federal law and regulation, utilize the records of the Department of
Employment and Economic Development of the state when necessary to effectuate
the purposes of this chapter;
(6) obtain upon request and
utilize the services of all state governmental departments and agencies;
(7) adopt suitable rules for
effectuating the purposes of this chapter;
(8) issue complaints,
receive and investigate charges alleging unfair discriminatory practices, and
determine whether or not probable cause exists for hearing;
(9) subpoena witnesses,
administer oaths, take testimony, and require the production for examination of
any books or papers relative to any matter under investigation or in question
as the commissioner deems appropriate to carry out the purposes of this
chapter;
(10) attempt, by means of
education, conference, conciliation, and persuasion to eliminate unfair
discriminatory practices as being contrary to the public policy of the state;
(11) develop and conduct
programs of formal and informal education designed to eliminate discrimination
and intergroup conflict by use of educational techniques and programs the
commissioner deems necessary;
(12) make a written report
of the activities of the commissioner to the governor each year;
(13) accept gifts, bequests,
grants, or other payments public and private to help finance the activities of
the department;
(14) create such local and
statewide advisory committees as will in the commissioner's judgment aid in
effectuating the purposes of the Department of Human Rights;
(15) develop such programs
as will aid in determining the compliance throughout the state with the
provisions of this chapter, and in the furtherance of such duties, conduct
research and study discriminatory practices based upon race, color, creed,
religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, marital status, status with
regard to public assistance, familial status, sexual orientation, or other
factors and develop accurate data on the nature and extent of discrimination
and other matters as they may affect housing, employment, public
accommodations, schools, and other areas of public life;
(16) develop and disseminate
technical assistance to persons subject to the provisions of this chapter, and
to agencies and officers of governmental and private agencies;
(17) provide staff services
to such advisory committees as may be created in aid of the functions of the
Department of Human Rights;
(18) make grants in aid to
the extent that appropriations are made available for that purpose in aid of
carrying out duties and responsibilities; and
(19) cooperate and consult
with the commissioner of labor and industry regarding the investigation of
violations of, and resolution of complaints regarding section 363A.08,
subdivision 7.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2554
In performing these duties, the commissioner shall give priority to
those duties in clauses (8), (9), and (10) and to the duties in section
363A.36.
(b) All gifts, bequests, grants, or other payments, public and private,
accepted under paragraph (a), clause (13), must be deposited in the state
treasury and credited to a special account. Money in the account is
appropriated to the commissioner of human rights to help finance activities of
the department.
Sec. 3. [504B.206] RIGHT OF
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE TO TERMINATE LEASE.
Subdivision 1. Right to terminate;
procedure. A tenant to a residential lease who is a victim of
domestic abuse and fears imminent domestic abuse against the tenant or the
tenant's children by remaining in the leased premises may terminate a lease
agreement without penalty or liability, except as provided by this section, by
providing written notice to the landlord stating that the tenant fears imminent
domestic abuse and indicating the specific date the tenant intends to vacate
the premises. The written notice must be delivered by mail, fax, or in person,
and be accompanied by one of the following:
(1) an order for protection under chapter 518B; or
(2) a no contact order, currently in effect, issued under section
518B.01, subdivision 22, or chapter 609.
Subd. 2. Confidentiality of
information. Information provided to the landlord by the victim
documenting domestic abuse pursuant to subdivision 1 shall be treated by the
landlord as confidential. The information may not be entered into any shared
database or provided to any entity except when required for use in an eviction
proceeding, upon the consent of the victim, or as otherwise required by law.
Subd. 3. Liability for rent;
termination of tenancy. (a) A tenant terminating a lease pursuant to
subdivision 1 is responsible for one month's rent following the vacation of the
premises and is relieved of any contractual obligation for payment of rent or
any other charges for the remaining term of the lease.
(b) This section does not affect a tenant's liability for delinquent,
unpaid rent or other sums owed to the landlord before the lease was terminated
by the tenant under this section. The return or retention of the security
deposit is subject to the provisions of section 504B.178.
(c) The tenancy terminates, including the right of possession of the
premises, when the tenant surrenders the keys to the premises to the landlord.
The one month's rent is due and payable on or before the date the tenant
vacates the premises, as indicated in their written notice pursuant to
subdivision 1. For purposes of this section, the provisions of section 504B.178
commence upon the first day of the month following either:
(1) the date the tenant vacates the premises; or
(2) the date the tenant pays the one month's rent, whichever occurs
first.
(d) The provisions of this subdivision do not apply until written notice
meeting the requirements of subdivision 1 is delivered to the landlord.
Subd. 4. Multiple tenants. Notwithstanding
the release of a tenant from a lease agreement under this section, if there are
any remaining tenants residing in the premises the tenancy shall continue for
those remaining tenants. A perpetrator who has been excluded from the premises
under court order remains liable under the lease with any other tenant of the
premises for rent or damage to the premises.
Journal of the House - 45th Day
- Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2555
Subd. 5. Waiver prohibited. A
residential tenant may not waive, and a landlord may not require the
residential tenant to waive, the resident tenant's rights under this section.
Subd. 6. Definition. For purposes
of this section, "domestic abuse" has the meaning given in section
518B.01, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518B.01, subdivision 6a, is
amended to read:
Subd. 6a. Subsequent orders and
extensions. (a) Upon application, notice to all parties, and
hearing, the court may extend the relief granted in an existing order for
protection or, if a petitioner's order for protection is no longer in effect
when an application for subsequent relief is made, grant a new order. The court
may extend the terms of an existing order or, if an order is no longer in
effect, grant a new order upon a showing that:
(1) the respondent has violated a prior or existing order for
protection;
(2) the petitioner is reasonably in fear of physical harm from the
respondent;
(3) the respondent has engaged in acts of harassment or stalking within
the meaning of section 609.749, subdivision 2; or
(4) the respondent is incarcerated and about to be released, or has
recently been released from incarceration.
A petitioner does not need to show that physical harm is imminent to
obtain an extension or a subsequent order under this subdivision.
(b) If the court extends relief in an existing order for protection or
grants a new order, the court may order the respondent to provide the following
information to the court for purposes of service of process: the respondent's
home address, the respondent's employment address, and the names and locations
of the respondent's parents, siblings, children, or other close relatives.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 595.02, subdivision 1, is
amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Competency of
witnesses. Every person of sufficient understanding, including a party, may
testify in any action or proceeding, civil or criminal, in court or before any
person who has authority to receive evidence, except as provided in this
subdivision:
(a) A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife without her
consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, nor can
either, during the marriage or afterwards, without the consent of the other, be
examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage.
This exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against
the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one
against the other or against a child of either or against a child under the
care of either spouse, nor to a criminal action or proceeding in which one is
charged with homicide or an attempt to commit homicide and the date of the
marriage of the defendant is subsequent to the date of the offense, nor to an
action or proceeding for nonsupport, neglect, dependency, or termination of
parental rights.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2556
(b) An attorney cannot, without the consent of the attorney's client,
be examined as to any communication made by the client to the attorney or the
attorney's advice given thereon in the course of professional duty; nor can any
employee of the attorney be examined as to the communication or advice, without
the client's consent.
(c) A member of the clergy or other minister of any religion shall not,
without the consent of the party making the confession, be allowed to disclose
a confession made to the member of the clergy or other minister in a
professional character, in the course of discipline enjoined by the rules or
practice of the religious body to which the member of the clergy or other
minister belongs; nor shall a member of the clergy or other minister of any
religion be examined as to any communication made to the member of the clergy
or other minister by any person seeking religious or spiritual advice, aid, or
comfort or advice given thereon in the course of the member of the clergy's or
other minister's professional character, without the consent of the person.
(d) A licensed physician or surgeon, dentist, or chiropractor shall
not, without the consent of the patient, be allowed to disclose any information
or any opinion based thereon which the professional acquired in attending the
patient in a professional capacity, and which was necessary to enable the
professional to act in that capacity; after the decease of the patient, in an
action to recover insurance benefits, where the insurance has been in existence
two years or more, the beneficiaries shall be deemed to be the personal
representatives of the deceased person for the purpose of waiving this
privilege, and no oral or written waiver of the privilege shall have any
binding force or effect except when made upon the trial or examination where
the evidence is offered or received.
(e) A public officer shall not be allowed to disclose communications
made to the officer in official confidence when the public interest would
suffer by the disclosure.
(f) Persons of unsound mind and persons intoxicated at the time of
their production for examination are not competent witnesses if they lack
capacity to remember or to relate truthfully facts respecting which they are
examined.
(g) A registered nurse, psychologist, consulting psychologist, or
licensed social worker engaged in a psychological or social assessment or
treatment of an individual at the individual's request shall not, without the
consent of the professional's client, be allowed to disclose any information or
opinion based thereon which the professional has acquired in attending the
client in a professional capacity, and which was necessary to enable the
professional to act in that capacity. Nothing in this clause exempts licensed
social workers from compliance with the provisions of sections 626.556 and
626.557.
(h) An interpreter for a person disabled in communication shall not,
without the consent of the person, be allowed to disclose any communication if
the communication would, if the interpreter were not present, be privileged.
For purposes of this section, a "person disabled in communication"
means a person who, because of a hearing, speech or other communication
disorder, or because of the inability to speak or comprehend the English language,
is unable to understand the proceedings in which the person is required to
participate. The presence of an interpreter as an aid to communication does not
destroy an otherwise existing privilege.
(i) Licensed chemical dependency counselors shall not disclose
information or an opinion based on the information which they acquire from
persons consulting them in their professional capacities, and which was
necessary to enable them to act in that capacity, except that they may do so:
(1) when informed consent has been obtained in writing, except in those
circumstances in which not to do so would violate the law or would result in
clear and imminent danger to the client or others;
(2) when the communications reveal the contemplation or ongoing
commission of a crime; or
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2557
(3) when the consulting
person waives the privilege by bringing suit or filing charges against the
licensed professional whom that person consulted.
(j) A parent or the parent's
minor child may not be examined as to any communication made in confidence by
the minor to the minor's parent. A communication is confidential if made out of
the presence of persons not members of the child's immediate family living in the
same household. This exception may be waived by express consent to disclosure
by a parent entitled to claim the privilege or by the child who made the
communication or by failure of the child or parent to object when the contents
of a communication are demanded. This exception does not apply to a civil
action or proceeding by one spouse against the other or by a parent or child
against the other, nor to a proceeding to commit either the child or parent to
whom the communication was made or to place the person or property or either
under the control of another because of an alleged mental or physical
condition, nor to a criminal action or proceeding in which the parent is
charged with a crime committed against the person or property of the
communicating child, the parent's spouse, or a child of either the parent or
the parent's spouse, or in which a child is charged with a crime or act of
delinquency committed against the person or property of a parent or a child of
a parent, nor to an action or proceeding for termination of parental rights,
nor any other action or proceeding on a petition alleging child abuse, child
neglect, abandonment or nonsupport by a parent.
(k) Sexual assault
counselors may not be compelled to testify about allowed to disclose
any opinion or information received from or about the victim without the
consent of the victim. However, a counselor may be compelled to identify or
disclose information in investigations or proceedings related to neglect or
termination of parental rights if the court determines good cause exists. In
determining whether to compel disclosure, the court shall weigh the public
interest and need for disclosure against the effect on the victim, the
treatment relationship, and the treatment services if disclosure occurs.
Nothing in this clause exempts sexual assault counselors from compliance with
the provisions of sections 626.556 and 626.557.
"Sexual assault
counselor" for the purpose of this section means a person who has
undergone at least 40 hours of crisis counseling training and works under the
direction of a supervisor in a crisis center, whose primary purpose is to
render advice, counseling, or assistance to victims of sexual assault.
(l) A person cannot be
examined as to any communication or document, including worknotes, made or used
in the course of or because of mediation pursuant to an agreement to mediate.
This does not apply to the parties in the dispute in an application to a court
by a party to have a mediated settlement agreement set aside or reformed. A
communication or document otherwise not privileged does not become privileged
because of this paragraph. This paragraph is not intended to limit the
privilege accorded to communication during mediation by the common law.
(m) A child under ten years
of age is a competent witness unless the court finds that the child lacks the
capacity to remember or to relate truthfully facts respecting which the child
is examined. A child describing any act or event may use language appropriate
for a child of that age.
(n) A communication
assistant for a telecommunications relay system for communication-impaired
persons shall not, without the consent of the person making the communication,
be allowed to disclose communications made to the communication assistant for
the purpose of relaying.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 609.748, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Restraining order. (a) The court may
grant a restraining order ordering the respondent to cease or avoid the
harassment of another person or to have no contact with that person if all of
the following occur:
(1) the petitioner has filed
a petition under subdivision 3;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2558
(2) the sheriff has served respondent with a copy of the temporary
restraining order obtained under subdivision 4, and with notice of the right to
request a hearing, or service has been made by publication under subdivision 3,
paragraph (b); and
(3) the court finds at the hearing that there are reasonable grounds to
believe that the respondent has engaged in harassment.
A restraining order may be
issued only against the respondent named in the petition; except that if the
respondent is an organization, the order may be issued against and apply to all
of the members of the organization. Relief granted by the restraining order
must be for a fixed period of not more than two years. When a referee presides
at the hearing on the petition, the restraining order becomes effective upon
the referee's signature.
If the petitioner has had one or more restraining orders in effect
against the respondent, the court may order the respondent to provide the following
information to the court for purposes of service of process: the respondent's
home address, the respondent's employment address, and the names and locations
of the respondent's parents, siblings, children, or other close relatives.
(b) An order issued under this subdivision must be personally served
upon the respondent. If personal service cannot be made, the court may order
service by alternate means, or by publication, which publication must be made
as in other actions. The application for alternate service must include the
last known location of the respondent; the petitioner's most recent contacts
with the respondent; the last known location of the respondent's employment;
the names and locations of the respondent's parents, siblings, children, and
other close relatives; the names and locations of other persons who are likely
to know the respondent's whereabouts; and a description of efforts to locate
those persons. The court shall consider the length of time the respondent's location
has been unknown, the likelihood that the respondent's location will become
known, the nature of the relief sought, and the nature of efforts made to
locate the respondent. The court shall order service by first class mail,
forwarding address requested, to any addresses where there is a reasonable
possibility that mail or information will be forwarded or communicated to the
respondent. The court may also order publication, within or without the state,
but only if it might reasonably succeed in notifying the respondent of the
proceeding. Service shall be deemed complete 14 days after mailing or 14 days
after court-ordered publication.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 611A.036, subdivision 2, is
amended to read:
Subd. 2. Victim's spouse or next
of kin. An employer must allow a victim of a heinous violent
crime, as well as the victim's spouse or next of kin, reasonable time off from
work to attend criminal proceedings related to the victim's case.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 611A.036, subdivision 7, is
amended to read:
Subd. 7. Definition. As used
in this section, "heinous crime" "violent crime"
means a violation or attempt to violate any of the following: section
609.185; 609.19; 609.195; 609.20; 609.205; 609.21; 609.221; 609.222; 609.223;
609.2231; 609.2241; 609.2242; 609.2245; 609.2247; 609.228; 609.23; 609.231;
609.2325; 609.233; 609.235; 609.24; 609.245; 609.25; 609.255; 609.265;
609.2661; 609.2662; 609.2663; 609.2664; 609.2665; 609.267; 609.2671; 609.2672;
609.268; 609.282; 609.342; 609.343; 609.344; 609.345; 609.3451; 609.3453;
609.352; 609.377; 609.378; 609.561, subdivision 1; 609.582, subdivision 1,
paragraph (a) or (c); or 609.66, subdivision 1e, paragraph (b).
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2559
(1) a violation or attempted violation of section 609.185 or 609.19;
(2) a violation of section 609.195 or 609.221; or
(3) a violation of section 609.342, 609.343, or 609.344, if the offense
was committed with force or violence or if the complainant was a minor at the
time of the offense.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 9. [611A.26] POLYGRAPH
EXAMINATIONS; CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT COMPLAINTS; LIMITATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Polygraph prohibition.
No law enforcement agency or prosecutor shall require that a complainant of
a criminal sexual conduct offense submit to a polygraph examination as part of
or a condition to proceeding with the investigation, charging, or prosecution
of such offense.
Subd. 2. Law enforcement inquiry.
A law enforcement agency or prosecutor may not ask that a complainant of a
criminal sexual conduct offense submit to a polygraph examination as part of
the investigation, charging, or prosecution of such offense unless the
complainant has been referred to, and had the opportunity to exercise the
option of consulting with a sexual assault counselor as defined in section
595.02, subdivision 1, paragraph (k).
Subd. 3. Informed consent
requirement. At the request of the complainant, a law enforcement
agency may conduct a polygraph examination of the complainant only with the
complainant's written, informed consent as provided in this subdivision.
Subd. 4. Informed consent. To
consent to a polygraph, a complainant must be informed in writing that:
(1) the taking of the polygraph examination is voluntary and solely at
the victim's request;
(2) a law enforcement agency or prosecutor may not ask or require that
the complainant submit to a polygraph examination;
(3) the results of the examination are not admissible in court; and
(4) the complainant's refusal to take a polygraph examination may not
be used as a basis by the law enforcement agency or prosecutor not to
investigate, charge, or prosecute the offender.
Subd. 5. Polygraph refusal. A
complainant's refusal to submit to a polygraph examination shall not prevent
the investigation, charging, or prosecution of the offense.
Subd. 6. Definitions. For
the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given.
(a) "Criminal sexual conduct" means a violation of section
609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or 609.3451.
(b) "Complainant" means a person reporting to have been
subjected to criminal sexual conduct.
(c) "Polygraph examination" means any mechanical or
electrical instrument or device of any type used or allegedly used to examine,
test, or question individuals for the purpose of determining truthfulness.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2008.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2560
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611A.675, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Grants authorized. The Crime Victim
and Witness Advisory Council commissioner of public safety shall
make grants to prosecutors and victim assistance programs for the purpose of
providing emergency assistance to victims. As used in this section,
"emergency assistance" includes but is not limited to:
(1) replacement of necessary
property that was lost, damaged, or stolen as a result of the crime;
(2) purchase and
installation of necessary home security devices;
(3) transportation to
locations related to the victim's needs as a victim, such as medical facilities
and facilities of the criminal justice system;
(4) cleanup of the crime
scene; and
(5) reimbursement for
reasonable travel and living expenses the victim incurred to attend court proceedings
that were held at a location other than the place where the crime occurred due
to a change of venue; and
(6) reimbursement of towing
and storage fees incurred due to impoundment of a recovered stolen vehicle.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611A.675, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Application for grants. (a) A
city or county attorney's office or victim assistance program may apply to the council
commissioner of public safety for a grant for any of the purposes described
in subdivision 1 or for any other emergency assistance purpose approved by the council
commissioner. The application must be on forms and pursuant to procedures
developed by the council commissioner. The application must
describe the type or types of intended emergency assistance, estimate the
amount of money required, and include any other information deemed necessary by
the council commissioner.
(b) A city or county
attorney's office or victim assistance program that applies for a grant for the
purpose described in subdivision 1, clause (6), must make the application on a
separate form and pursuant to procedures developed by the commissioner. The
application must estimate the amount of money required for reimbursement costs,
estimate the amount of money required for administrative costs, and include any
other information deemed necessary by the commissioner. An applicant may not
spend in any fiscal year more than five percent of the grant awarded for
administrative costs.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611A.675, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. Awards; limitations. (a) No award may be granted under
subdivision 1, clause (6), to a victim that fails to provide proof of insurance
stating that security had been provided for the vehicle at the time the vehicle
was stolen. As used in this paragraph, "proof of insurance" has the
meaning given it in section 169.791, subdivision 1, paragraph (g).
(b) An award paid to a
victim under subdivision 1, clause (6), shall compensate the victim for actual
costs incurred but shall not exceed $300.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2561
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611A.675, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Reporting by local agencies required. A
city or county attorney's office or victim assistance program that receives a
grant under this section shall file an annual report with the council
commissioner of public safety itemizing the expenditures made during the
preceding year, the purpose of those expenditures, and the ultimate
disposition, if any, of each assisted victim's criminal case.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611A.675, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Report to legislature. On or before
February 1, 1999, the council shall report to the chairs of the senate Crime
Prevention and house of representatives Judiciary Committees on the
implementation, use, and administration of the grant program created under this
section. By February 1, 2008, the commissioner of public safety shall
report to the chairs and ranking members of the senate and house committees and
divisions having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding on the
implementation, use, and administration of the grant programs created under
this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 15. PHOTOGRAPH AND NO CONTACT ORDERS.
The state court
administrator shall convene a multidisciplinary implementation work group to
study the attachment of photographs to criminal no contact orders and report
their recommendations to the appropriate committees of the house of
representatives and senate in charge of criminal justice policy by June 30,
2008.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
ARTICLE 5
COURTS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 2.722, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Description. Effective July 1, 1959,
the state is divided into ten judicial districts composed of the following
named counties, respectively, in each of which districts judges shall be chosen
as hereinafter specified:
1. Goodhue, Dakota, Carver,
Le Sueur, McLeod, Scott, and Sibley; 33 36 judges; and four
permanent chambers shall be maintained in Red Wing, Hastings, Shakopee, and
Glencoe and one other shall be maintained at the place designated by the chief
judge of the district;
2. Ramsey; 26 judges;
3. Wabasha, Winona, Houston,
Rice, Olmsted, Dodge, Steele, Waseca, Freeborn, Mower, and Fillmore; 23 24
judges; and permanent chambers shall be maintained in Faribault, Albert
Lea, Austin, Rochester, and Winona;
4. Hennepin; 60 judges;
5. Blue Earth, Watonwan,
Lyon, Redwood, Brown, Nicollet, Lincoln, Cottonwood, Murray, Nobles, Pipestone,
Rock, Faribault, Martin, and Jackson; 16 judges; and permanent chambers shall
be maintained in Marshall, Windom, Fairmont, New Ulm, and Mankato;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2562
6. Carlton, St. Louis, Lake, and Cook; 15 judges;
7. Benton, Douglas, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Otter Tail, Stearns, Todd,
Clay, Becker, and Wadena; 27 judges; and permanent chambers shall be maintained
in Moorhead, Fergus Falls, Little Falls, and St. Cloud;
8. Chippewa, Kandiyohi, Lac qui Parle, Meeker, Renville, Swift, Yellow
Medicine, Big Stone, Grant, Pope, Stevens, Traverse, and Wilkin; 11 judges; and
permanent chambers shall be maintained in Morris, Montevideo, and Willmar;
9. Norman, Polk, Marshall, Kittson, Red Lake, Roseau, Mahnomen,
Pennington, Aitkin, Itasca, Crow Wing, Hubbard, Beltrami, Lake of the Woods,
Clearwater, Cass and Koochiching; 22 23 judges; and permanent
chambers shall be maintained in Crookston, Thief River Falls, Bemidji,
Brainerd, Grand Rapids, and International Falls; and
10. Anoka, Isanti, Wright, Sherburne, Kanabec, Pine, Chisago, and
Washington; 43 44 judges; and permanent chambers shall be
maintained in Anoka, Stillwater, and other places designated by the chief judge
of the district.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2008.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 3.732, subdivision 1, is
amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definitions. As
used in this section and section 3.736 the terms defined in this section have
the meanings given them.
(1) "State" includes each of the departments, boards,
agencies, commissions, courts, and officers in the executive, legislative, and
judicial branches of the state of Minnesota and includes but is not limited to
the Housing Finance Agency, the Minnesota Office of Higher Education, the
Higher Education Facilities Authority, the Health Technology Advisory
Committee, the Armory Building Commission, the Zoological Board, the Iron Range
Resources and Rehabilitation Board, the State Agricultural Society, the
University of Minnesota, the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, state
hospitals, and state penal institutions. It does not include a city, town,
county, school district, or other local governmental body corporate and
politic.
(2) "Employee of the state" means all present or former
officers, members, directors, or employees of the state, members of the
Minnesota National Guard, members of a bomb disposal unit approved by the
commissioner of public safety and employed by a municipality defined in section
466.01 when engaged in the disposal or neutralization of bombs or other similar
hazardous explosives, as defined in section 299C.063, outside the jurisdiction
of the municipality but within the state, or persons acting on behalf of the
state in an official capacity, temporarily or permanently, with or without
compensation. It does not include either an independent contractor except,
for purposes of this section and section 3.736 only, a guardian ad litem acting
under court appointment, or members of the Minnesota National Guard while
engaged in training or duty under United States Code, title 10, or title 32,
section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505, as amended through December 31, 1983.
Notwithstanding sections 43A.02 and 611.263, for purposes of this section and
section 3.736 only, "employee of the state" includes a district
public defender or assistant district public defender in the Second or Fourth
Judicial District and a member of the Health Technology Advisory Committee.
(3) "Scope of office or employment" means that the employee
was acting on behalf of the state in the performance of duties or tasks
lawfully assigned by competent authority.
(4) "Judicial branch" has the meaning given in section
43A.02, subdivision 25.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2563
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 3.736, subdivision 1, is
amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General rule.
The state will pay compensation for injury to or loss of property or personal
injury or death caused by an act or omission of an employee of the state while
acting within the scope of office or employment or a peace officer who is not
acting on behalf of a private employer and who is acting in good faith under
section 629.40, subdivision 4, under circumstances where the state, if a
private person, would be liable to the claimant, whether arising out of a
governmental or proprietary function. Nothing in this section waives the
defense of judicial, quasi-judicial, or legislative immunity except to
the extent provided in subdivision 8.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 15A.083, subdivision 4, is
amended to read:
Subd. 4. Ranges for other
judicial positions. Salaries or salary ranges are provided for the
following positions in the judicial branch of government. The appointing authority
of any position for which a salary range has been provided shall fix the
individual salary within the prescribed range, considering the qualifications
and overall performance of the employee. The Supreme Court shall set the
salary of the state court administrator and the salaries of district court
administrators. The salary of the state court administrator or a district court
administrator may not exceed the salary of a district court judge. If
district court administrators die, the amounts of their unpaid salaries for the
months in which their deaths occur must be paid to their estates. The salary of
the state public defender shall be fixed by the State Board of Public Defense
but must not exceed the salary of a district court judge.
Salary
or Range
Effective
July 1, 1994
Board
on Judicial Standards
executive
director $44,000-60,000
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 5. [72A.329] DIRECT
LIABILITY OF INSURER.
Any bond or policy of insurance covering liability to others for
negligence makes the insurer liable, up to the amounts stated in the bond or
policy, to the persons entitled to recover against the insured for the death of
any person or for injury to persons or property, irrespective of whether the
liability is presently established or is contingent and to become fixed or
certain by final judgment against the insured.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to bonds or policies of insurance issued,
renewed, or in place on or after that date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 260C.193, subdivision 6, is
amended to read:
Subd. 6. Termination of
jurisdiction. The court may dismiss the petition or otherwise terminate its
jurisdiction on its own motion or on the motion or petition of any interested
party at any time. Unless terminated by the court, and except as otherwise
provided in this subdivision, the jurisdiction of the court shall continue
until the individual becomes 19 years of age if the court determines it is in the
best interest of the individual to do so. Court jurisdiction under section
260C.007, subdivision 6, clause (14), may not continue past the child's 18th
birthday.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2564
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 270A.03, subdivision 5, is
amended to read:
Subd. 5. Debt.
"Debt" means a legal obligation of a natural person to pay a fixed
and certain amount of money, which equals or exceeds $25 and which is due and
payable to a claimant agency. The term includes criminal fines imposed under
section 609.10 or 609.125, fines imposed for petty misdemeanors as defined in
section 609.02, subdivision 4a, and restitution. The term also includes the
co-payment for the appointment of a district public defender imposed under
section 611.17, paragraph (c). A debt may arise under a contractual or
statutory obligation, a court order, or other legal obligation, but need not
have been reduced to judgment.
A debt includes any legal obligation of a current recipient of
assistance which is based on overpayment of an assistance grant where that
payment is based on a client waiver or an administrative or judicial finding of
an intentional program violation; or where the debt is owed to a program
wherein the debtor is not a client at the time notification is provided to
initiate recovery under this chapter and the debtor is not a current recipient
of food support, transitional child care, or transitional medical assistance.
A debt does not include any legal obligation to pay a claimant agency
for medical care, including hospitalization if the income of the debtor at the
time when the medical care was rendered does not exceed the following amount:
(1) for an unmarried debtor, an income of $8,800 or less;
(2) for a debtor with one dependent, an income of $11,270 or less;
(3) for a debtor with two dependents, an income of $13,330 or less;
(4) for a debtor with three dependents, an income of $15,120 or less;
(5) for a debtor with four dependents, an income of $15,950 or less;
and
(6) for a debtor with five or more dependents, an income of $16,630 or
less.
The income amounts in this subdivision shall be adjusted for inflation for
debts incurred in calendar years 2001 and thereafter. The dollar amount of each
income level that applied to debts incurred in the prior year shall be
increased in the same manner as provided in section 1(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 2000, except that for the
purposes of this subdivision the percentage increase shall be determined from
the year starting September 1, 1999, and ending August 31, 2000, as the base
year for adjusting for inflation for debts incurred after December 31, 2000.
Debt also includes an agreement to pay a MinnesotaCare premium,
regardless of the dollar amount of the premium authorized under section
256L.15, subdivision 1a.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 302A.781, is amended by adding
a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Other claims preserved.
In addition to the claims in subdivision 4, all other statutory and common
law rights of persons who may bring claims of injury to a person, including
death, are not affected by dissolution under this chapter.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2565
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 352D.02, subdivision 1, is
amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Coverage. (a)
Employees enumerated in paragraph (c), clauses (2), (3), (4), and (6) to (14),
if they are in the unclassified service of the state or Metropolitan Council
and are eligible for coverage under the general state employees retirement plan
under chapter 352, are participants in the unclassified plan under this chapter
unless the employee gives notice to the executive director of the Minnesota
State Retirement System within one year following the commencement of
employment in the unclassified service that the employee desires coverage under
the general state employees retirement plan. For the purposes of this chapter,
an employee who does not file notice with the executive director is deemed to
have exercised the option to participate in the unclassified plan.
(b) Persons referenced in paragraph (c), clause (5), are participants
in the unclassified program under this chapter unless the person was eligible
to elect different coverage under section 3A.07 and elected retirement coverage
by the applicable alternative retirement plan. Persons referenced in paragraph
(c), clause (15), are participants in the unclassified program under this
chapter for judicial employment in excess of the service credit limit in
section 490.121, subdivision 22.
(c) Enumerated employees and referenced persons are:
(1) the governor, the lieutenant governor, the secretary of state, the
state auditor, and the attorney general;
(2) an employee in the Office of the Governor, Lieutenant Governor,
Secretary of State, State Auditor, Attorney General;
(3) an employee of the State Board of Investment;
(4) the head of a department, division, or agency created by statute in
the unclassified service, an acting department head subsequently appointed to
the position, or an employee enumerated in section 15A.0815 or 15A.083,
subdivision 4;
(5) a member of the legislature;
(6) a full-time unclassified employee of the legislature or a
commission or agency of the legislature who is appointed without a limit on the
duration of the employment or a temporary legislative employee having shares in
the supplemental retirement fund as a result of former employment covered by
this chapter, whether or not eligible for coverage under the Minnesota State
Retirement System;
(7) a person who is employed in a position established under section
43A.08, subdivision 1, clause (3), or in a position authorized under a statute
creating or establishing a department or agency of the state, which is at the
deputy or assistant head of department or agency or director level;
(8) the regional administrator, or executive director of the
Metropolitan Council, general counsel, division directors, operations managers,
and other positions as designated by the council, all of which may not exceed
27 positions at the council and the chair;
(9) the executive director, associate executive director, and not to
exceed nine positions of the Minnesota Office of Higher Education in the
unclassified service, as designated by the Minnesota Office of Higher Education
before January 1, 1992, or subsequently redesignated with the approval of the
board of directors of the Minnesota State Retirement System, unless the person
has elected coverage by the individual retirement account plan under chapter
354B;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2566
(10) the clerk of the appellate courts appointed under article VI,
section 2, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota, the state court
administrator and judicial district administrators;
(11) the chief executive officers of correctional facilities operated
by the Department of Corrections and of hospitals and nursing homes operated by
the Department of Human Services;
(12) an employee whose principal employment is at the state ceremonial
house;
(13) an employee of the Minnesota Educational Computing Corporation;
(14) an employee of the State Lottery who is covered by the managerial plan
established under section 43A.18, subdivision 3; and
(15) a judge who has exceeded the service credit limit in section
490.121, subdivision 22.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 10. [357.42] DRUG COURT
FEES.
(a) When a court establishes a drug court process, the court may
establish one or more fees for services provided to defendants participating in
the process.
(b) In each fiscal year, the court shall deposit the drug court
participation fees in the special revenue fund and credit the fees to a
separate account for the trial courts. The balance in this account is
appropriated to the trial courts and does not cancel but is available until
expended. Expenditures from this account must be made for drug court purposes.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 484.54, subdivision 2, is
amended to read:
Subd. 2. Expense payments. A
judge shall be paid travel and subsistence expenses for travel from the judge's
place of residence to and from the judge's permanent chambers only for a period
of two years after July 1, 1977, or the date the judge initially assumes
office, whichever is later as provided by Judicial Council policy.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 484.83, is amended to read:
484.83 REINSTATEMENT OF
FORFEITED SUMS.
Subdivision 1. Abandonment of fees.
All sums deposited with the court administrator to cover fees shall be
deemed abandoned if the fees are not disbursed or the services covered by the
fees are not performed and the person entitled to refund of the fees does not
file a written demand for refund with the court administrator within six months
from the date of trial, dismissal, or striking of the cause as to jury fees and
from the date of deposit as to other fees.
Subd. 2. Bail forfeitures. Any
bail not forfeited by court order shall be deemed abandoned and forfeited if
the person entitled to refund does not file a written demand for refund with
the court administrator within six months from the date when the person became
entitled to the refund.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2567
Subd. 3. Reinstated forfeited sums. A district court judge may order
any sums forfeited to be reinstated and the commissioner of finance shall then
refund accordingly. The commissioner of finance shall reimburse the court
administrator if the court administrator refunds the deposit upon a judge's
order and obtains a receipt to be used as a voucher.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 13. [484.843] ABANDONMENT OF NONFELONY BAIL;
DISPOSITION OF FORFEITED SUMS; FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT.
Subdivision 1. Abandonment of deposits and bail. (a) Any bail deposited
with the court administrator of the Fourth Judicial District on a nonfelony
case and not forfeited by court order shall be deemed abandoned and forfeited
if the person entitled to refund does not file a written demand for refund with
the court administrator within six months from the date when the person became
entitled to the refund.
(b) Any judge may order any
sums so forfeited under paragraph (a) to be reinstated for cause and the court
administrator shall then refund accordingly. The receipting municipality or
subdivision of government shall reimburse the court administrator if the court
administrator refunds the deposit upon such an order and obtains a receipt to
be used as a voucher.
Subd. 2. Disposition of forfeited sums. All sums collected on any
bail, bond, or recognizance forfeited by court order or under subdivision 1,
paragraph (a), for the Fourth Judicial District on a nonfelony case shall be
paid to Hennepin County to be applied to the support of the law library of the
county. The receipt of the county treasurer to the court administrator shall be
a sufficient voucher. When the sums so forfeited, minus refunds, during any
calendar year equal $2,500, all sums in excess of that amount shall be paid to
the municipality or subdivision of government in which the violation occurred.
The payments shall be made periodically but not before six months from the date
of the order for forfeiture. During that six-month period, but not thereafter,
any judge may set aside the forfeiture order upon proper showing of cause. No
obligation to pay sums so ordered forfeited exists unless the forfeiture is not
set aside within the six-month period. For the purpose of determining when the
$2,500 shall have accrued to the county law library, the final forfeiture shall
be deemed to occur at the end of the six-month period.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 504B.361, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Summons and writ. (a) The state
court administrator shall develop a uniform form for the summons and writ
of recovery of premises and order to vacate may be substantially in the
forms in paragraphs (b) and (c).
(b)
FORM OF SUMMONS
State of Minnesota
)
) ss.
County of................ )
Whereas, ..............., of
..........., has filed with the undersigned, a judge of county stated, a
complaint against ..............., of .........., a copy of which is attached:
You are hereby summoned to appear before the undersigned on the .......... day
of .........., year.........., at .......... o'clock ...m., at .........., to
answer and defend against the complaint and to further be dealt with according
to law.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2568
Dated at ........, this ........ day of ........, year
......
.......................................................,
Judge of ....................................... court.
(c)
FORM
OF WRIT OF RECOVERY OF PREMISES AND ORDER TO VACATE
State of Minnesota )
) ss.
County
of..................... )
The State of Minnesota, to the Sheriff of the County:
Whereas, ..............., the plaintiff, of ..............., in an eviction
action, at a court held at ..............., in the county of
....................., on the ............... day of ..............., year
..............., before ..............., a judge of the county, recovered a
judgment against ..............., the ..............., to have recovery of the
following premises (describe here the property as in the complaint):
..................
Therefore, you are commanded that, taking with you the force of the
county, if necessary, you cause ................. to be immediately removed
from the premises, and the plaintiff to recover the premises. You are also
commanded that from the personal property of ........................ within
the county that you seize and sell, the plaintiff be paid ............ .
dollars, as the costs assessed against the defendant, together with 25 cents
for this writ. You are ordered to return this writ within 30 days.
Dated at ........, this ........ day of ........, year
......
.......................................................,
Judge.......................................of court.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518.165, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision
1. Permissive appointment of guardian ad
litem. In all proceedings for child custody or for dissolution or legal
separation where custody or parenting time with a minor child is in issue, the
court may appoint a guardian ad litem from a panel established by the court to
represent the interests of the child. The guardian ad litem shall advise the
court with respect to custody, support, and parenting time.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
16. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518.165, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd.
2. Required appointment of guardian ad
litem. In all proceedings for child custody or for marriage dissolution or
legal separation in which custody or parenting time with a minor child is an
issue, if the court has reason to believe that the minor child is a victim of
domestic child abuse or neglect, as those terms are defined in sections
260C.007 and 626.556, respectively, the court shall appoint a guardian ad
litem. The guardian ad litem shall represent the interests of the child and
advise the court with respect to custody, support, and parenting time.
If the child is represented by a guardian ad litem in any other pending
proceeding, the court may appoint that guardian
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2569
to represent the child in
the custody or parenting time proceeding. No guardian ad litem need be
appointed if the alleged domestic child abuse or neglect is before the court on
a juvenile dependency and neglect petition. Nothing in this subdivision
requires the court to appoint a guardian ad litem in any proceeding for child
custody, marriage dissolution, or legal separation in which an allegation of
domestic child abuse or neglect has not been made.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.35, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd.
3. Income cap on determining basic
support. (a) The basic support obligation for parents with a combined
parental income for determining child support in excess of the income limit currently
in effect under subdivision 2 must be the same dollar amount as provided
for the parties with a combined parental income for determining child support
equal to the income in effect limit under subdivision 2.
(b)
A court may order a basic support obligation in a child support order in an
amount that exceeds the income limit in subdivision 2 if it finds that a child
has a disability or other substantial, demonstrated need for the additional
support for those reasons set forth in section 518A.43 and that the additional
support will directly benefit the child.
(c)
The dollar amount for the cap in subdivision 2 must be adjusted on July 1 of
every even-numbered year to reflect cost-of-living changes. The Supreme Court
must select the index for the adjustment from the indices listed in section
518A.75, subdivision 1. The state court administrator must make the changes in
the dollar amounts required by this paragraph available to courts and the
public on or before April 30 of the year in which the amount is to change.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
18. [540.19] NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS;
INSURERS.
Subdivision
1. Direct action. In any action
for damages caused by negligence, any insurer which:
(1)
has an interest in the outcome of the controversy adverse to the plaintiff or
any of the parties to the controversy;
(2)
by its policy of insurance assumes or reserves the right to control the
prosecution, defense, or settlement of the claim or action; or
(3)
by its policy agrees to prosecute or defend the action brought by plaintiff or
any of the parties to the action, or agrees to engage counsel to prosecute or
defend the action or agrees to pay the costs of the litigation,
is by this section made a
proper party defendant in any action brought by plaintiff in this state on
account of any claim against the insured. If the policy of insurance was issued
or delivered outside this state, the insurer is by this subdivision made a
proper party defendant only if the accident, injury, or negligence occurred in
this state.
Subd.
2. Other parties; impleading. If
an insurer is made a party defendant pursuant to this section and it appears at
any time before or during the trial that there is or may be a cross issue
between the insurer and the insured or any issue between any other person and
the insurer involving the question of the insurer's liability if judgment
should be rendered against the insured, the court may, upon motion of any
defendant in the action, cause the person who may be liable upon such cross
issue to be made a party defendant to the action and all the issues involved in
the controversy determined in the trial of the action or any third party may be
impleaded. Nothing in this subdivision
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2570
prohibits the trial court
from directing and conducting separate trials on the issue of liability to the
plaintiff or other party seeking affirmative relief and on the issue of whether
the insurance policy in question affords coverage. Any party may move for
separate trials. If the court orders separate trials, the court shall specify
in its order the sequence in which the trials are to be conducted.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to actions commenced on or after that
date.
Sec.
19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 549.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. When owed; rate. (a) When a
judgment or award is for the recovery of money, including a judgment for the
recovery of taxes, interest from the time of the verdict, award, or report
until judgment is finally entered shall be computed by the court administrator
or arbitrator as provided in paragraph (c) and added to the judgment or award.
(b)
Except as otherwise provided by contract or allowed by law, preverdict,
preaward, or prereport interest on pecuniary damages shall be computed as
provided in paragraph (c) from the time of the commencement of the action or a
demand for arbitration, or the time of a written notice of claim, whichever
occurs first, except as provided herein. The action must be commenced within
two years of a written notice of claim for interest to begin to accrue from the
time of the notice of claim. If either party serves a written offer of
settlement, the other party may serve a written acceptance or a written
counteroffer within 30 days. After that time, interest on the judgment or award
shall be calculated by the judge or arbitrator in the following manner. The
prevailing party shall receive interest on any judgment or award from the time
of commencement of the action or a demand for arbitration, or the time of a
written notice of claim, or as to special damages from the time when special
damages were incurred, if later, until the time of verdict, award, or report
only if the amount of its offer is closer to the judgment or award than the
amount of the opposing party's offer. If the amount of the losing party's offer
was closer to the judgment or award than the prevailing party's offer, the
prevailing party shall receive interest only on the amount of the settlement
offer or the judgment or award, whichever is less, and only from the time of
commencement of the action or a demand for arbitration, or the time of a
written notice of claim, or as to special damages from when the special damages
were incurred, if later, until the time the settlement offer was made.
Subsequent offers and counteroffers supersede the legal effect of earlier
offers and counteroffers. For the purposes of clause (2), the amount of
settlement offer must be allocated between past and future damages in the same
proportion as determined by the trier of fact. Except as otherwise provided by
contract or allowed by law, preverdict, preaward, or prereport interest shall
not be awarded on the following:
(1)
judgments, awards, or benefits in workers' compensation cases, but not
including third-party actions;
(2)
judgments or awards for future damages;
(3)
punitive damages, fines, or other damages that are noncompensatory in nature;
(4)
judgments or awards not in excess of the amount specified in section 491A.01;
and
(5)
that portion of any verdict, award, or report which is founded upon interest,
or costs, disbursements, attorney fees, or other similar items added by the
court or arbitrator.
(c)
The interest shall be computed as simple interest per annum. The rate of
interest shall be based on the secondary market yield of one year United States
Treasury bills, calculated on a bank discount basis as provided in this
section.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2571
On
or before the 20th day of December of each year the state court administrator
shall determine the rate from the one-year constant maturity treasury yield for
the most recent calendar month, reported on a monthly basis in the latest
statistical release of the board of governors of the Federal Reserve System.
This yield, rounded to the nearest one percent, or four ten
percent, whichever is greater, shall be the annual interest rate during the
succeeding calendar year. The state court administrator shall communicate the
interest rates to the court administrators and sheriffs for use in computing
the interest on verdicts and shall make the interest rates available to
arbitrators.
When
a judgment creditor, or the judgment creditor's attorney or agent, has received
a payment after entry of judgment, whether the payment is made voluntarily by or
on behalf of the judgment debtor, or is collected by legal process other than
execution levy where a proper return has been filed with the court
administrator, the judgment creditor, or the judgment creditor's attorney,
before applying to the court administrator for an execution shall file with the
court administrator an affidavit of partial satisfaction. The affidavit must
state the dates and amounts of payments made upon the judgment after the most
recent affidavit of partial satisfaction filed, if any; the part of each
payment that is applied to taxable disbursements and to accrued interest and to
the unpaid principal balance of the judgment; and the accrued, but the unpaid
interest owing, if any, after application of each payment.
(d)
This section does not apply to arbitrations between employers and employees
under chapter 179 or 179A. An arbitrator is neither required to nor prohibited
from awarding interest under chapter 179 or under section 179A.16 for essential
employees.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 563.01, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:
Subd.
7a. Copy costs. The court
administrator shall provide a person who is proceeding in forma pauperis with
copies of the person's court file without charge.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
21. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 590.05, is amended to read:
590.05 INDIGENT PETITIONERS.
A
person financially unable to obtain counsel who desires to pursue the remedy
provided in section 590.01 may apply for representation by the state public
defender. The state public defender shall represent such person under the
applicable provisions of sections 611.14 to 611.27, if the person has not
already had a direct appeal of the conviction. If, however, the person pled
guilty and received a presumptive sentence or a downward departure in sentence,
and the state public defender reviewed the person's case and determined that
there was no basis for an appeal of the conviction or of the sentence, then the
state public defender may decline to represent the person in a postconviction
remedy case. The state public defender may represent, without charge, all
other persons pursuing a postconviction remedy under section 590.01, who are
financially unable to obtain counsel.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
22. [604.18] GOOD FAITH INSURANCE
PRACTICES.
Subdivision
1. Required conduct. (a) An
insurer shall act in good faith in connection with any matter involving a claim
under an insurance policy.
(b)
An insurer does not act in good faith if the insurer delays or denies benefits
offered or paid without an objectively reasonable basis for its offer, delay,
or denial. An insurer also does not act in good faith if the insurer engages in
any fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, misleading
statement, or deceptive practice that others rely on in connection with any
matter involving a claim under an insurance policy.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2572
(c)
For purposes of this section:
(1)
"insurance policy" means an insurance policy or contract issued,
executed, renewed, maintained, or delivered in this state, other than a workers'
compensation insurance policy or contract or other policy or contract of a
health carrier as defined in section 62A.011; and
(2)
"insurer" means an insurance company: (i) incorporated or organized
in this state; or (ii) admitted to do business in this state but not
incorporated or organized in this state. The term does not include a political
subdivision providing self-insurance or establishing a pool under section
471.981, subdivision 3.
Subd.
2. Penalties and remedies. A
person violating subdivision 1 is acting against the public interest and is
liable to the injured party for costs, damages, and reasonable attorney fees.
Subd.
3. Insurance producers; liability limited.
A licensed insurance producer is not liable under this section for errors,
acts, or omissions attributed to the insurer that appointed the producer to
transact business on its behalf, except to the extent the producer has caused
or contributed to the error, act, or omission.
Subd.
4. Report to commissioner. An
insurer shall promptly report to the commissioner of commerce the date and
disposition of every settlement and award against the insurer for a violation
of subdivision 1.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007, and applies to causes of action commenced or pending
on or after that date.
Sec.
23. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 609.135, subdivision 8, is amended to
read:
Subd.
8. Fine and surcharge collection. (a)
A defendant's obligation to pay court-ordered fines, surcharges, court costs,
restitution, and fees shall survive for a period of six years from the date
of the expiration of the defendant's stayed sentence for the offense for which
the fines, surcharges, court costs, restitution, and fees were imposed,
or six years from the imposition or due date of the fines, surcharges, court
costs, restitution, and fees, whichever is later. Nothing in this
subdivision extends the period of a defendant's stay of sentence imposition or
execution.
(b)
The six-year period relating to a defendant's obligation to pay restitution
under paragraph (a) does not limit the victim's right to collect restitution
through other means such as a civil judgment.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec.
24. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 611.14, is amended to read:
611.14 RIGHT TO
REPRESENTATION BY PUBLIC DEFENDER.
The
following persons who are financially unable to obtain counsel are entitled to
be represented by a public defender:
(1)
a person charged with a felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor including a
person charged under sections 629.01 to 629.29;
(2)
a person appealing from a conviction of a felony or gross misdemeanor, or a
person convicted of a felony or gross misdemeanor, who is pursuing a
postconviction proceeding and who has not already had a direct appeal of the
conviction, but if the person pled guilty and received a presumptive
sentence or a downward departure in sentence, and the state public defender
reviewed the person's case and determined that there was no basis for an appeal
of the conviction or of the sentence, then the state public defender may
decline to represent the person in a postconviction remedy case;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2573
(3) a person who is entitled
to be represented by counsel under section 609.14, subdivision 2; or
(4) a minor ten years of age
or older who is entitled to be represented by counsel under section 260B.163,
subdivision 4, or 260C.163, subdivision 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.20, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Reimbursement schedule guidelines. In
determining a defendant's reimbursement schedule, the court may derive a
specific dollar amount per month by multiplying the defendant's net income by
the percent indicated by the following guidelines:
Net Income Per Month of
Defendant Number
of Dependents Not Including Defendant
4
or more 3 2 1 0
$200 and Below Percentage
based on the ability of the defendant to pay as determined by the
court.
$200 - 350 8% 9.5% 11% 12.5% 14%
$351 - 500 9% 11% 12.5% 14% 15%
$501 - 650 10% 12% 14% 15% 17%
$651 - 800 11% 13.5% 15.5% 17% 19%
$801 and above 12% 14.5% 17% 19% 20%
"Net income" shall
have the meaning given it in section 518.551, subdivision 5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.215, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Structure; membership. (a) The State
Board of Public Defense is a part of, but is not subject to the administrative
control of, the judicial branch of government. The State Board of Public
Defense shall consist of seven members including:
(1) four attorneys admitted
to the practice of law, well acquainted with the defense of persons accused of
crime, but not employed as prosecutors, appointed by the Supreme Court; and
(2) three public members
appointed by the governor.
After the expiration of the
terms of persons appointed to the board before March 1, 1991, The appointing authorities
may not appoint a person who is a judge to be a member of the State Board of
Public Defense, other than as a member of the ad hoc Board of Public Defense.
(b) All members shall
demonstrate an interest in maintaining a high quality, independent defense
system for those who are unable to obtain adequate representation. Appointments
to the board shall include qualified women and members of minority groups. At least
three members of the board shall be from judicial districts other than the
First, Second, Fourth, and Tenth Judicial Districts. The terms, compensation,
and removal of members shall be as provided in section 15.0575. The chair shall
be elected by the members from among the membership for a term of two years.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2574
(c) In addition, the State
Board of Public Defense shall consist of a nine-member ad hoc board when
considering the appointment of district public defenders under section 611.26,
subdivision 2. The terms of chief district public defenders currently serving
shall terminate in accordance with the staggered term schedule set forth in
section 611.26, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.215, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Chief administrator. The State Board
of Public Defense, with the advice of the state public defender,
shall appoint a chief administrator who must be chosen solely on the basis of
training, experience, and other qualifications, and who will serve at the
pleasure of the state public defender State Board of Public Defense.
The chief administrator need not be licensed to practice law. The chief
administrator shall attend all meetings of the board, but may not vote, and
shall:
(1) enforce all resolutions,
rules, regulations, or orders of the board;
(2) present to the board and
the state public defender plans, studies, and reports prepared for the board's
and the state public defender's purposes and recommend to the board and the
state public defender for adoption measures necessary to enforce or carry out
the powers and duties of the board and the state public defender, or to
efficiently administer the affairs of the board and the state public defender;
(3) keep the board fully
advised as to its financial condition, and prepare and submit to the board its
annual budget and other financial information as it may request;
(4) recommend to the board
the adoption of rules and regulations necessary for the efficient operation of
the board and its functions; and
(5) perform other duties
prescribed by the board and the state public defender.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.23, is amended to read:
611.23 OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER; APPOINTMENT; SALARY.
The state public defender is
responsible to the State Board of Public Defense. The state public defender
shall supervise the operation, activities, policies, and procedures of the
statewide public defender system. When requested by a district public defender
or appointed counsel, the state public defender may assist the district public
defender, appointed counsel, or an organization designated in section 611.216
in the performance of duties, including trial representation in matters
involving legal conflicts of interest or other special circumstances, and assistance
with legal research and brief preparation. The state public defender shall
be appointed by the State Board of Public Defense for a term of four years,
except as otherwise provided in this section, and until a successor is
appointed and qualified. The state public defender shall be a full-time
qualified attorney, licensed to practice law in this state, serve in the
unclassified service of the state, and be removed only for cause by the
appointing authority. Vacancies in the office shall be filled by the appointing
authority for the unexpired term. The salary of the state public defender shall
be fixed by the State Board of Public Defense but must not exceed the salary of
a district court judge. Terms of the state public defender shall commence on
July 1. The state public defender shall devote full time to the performance of
duties and shall not engage in the general practice of law.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2575
Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.24, is amended to read:
611.24 CHIEF APPELLATE PUBLIC DEFENDER; ORGANIZATION OF OFFICE;
ASSISTANTS.
The state public defender shall
supervise the operation, activities, policies and procedures of the state
public defender system. The state public defender shall employ or retain
assistant state public defenders, a chief administrator, a deputy state (a) Beginning January 1,
2007, and for every four years after that date, the State Board of Public
Defense shall appoint a chief appellate public defender in charge of appellate services,
who shall employ or retain assistant state public defenders and other
personnel as may be necessary to discharge the functions of the office. The
chief appellate public defender shall serve a four-year term and may be removed
only for cause upon the order of the State Board of Public Defense. The chief
appellate public defender shall be a full-time qualified attorney, licensed to
practice law in this state, and serve in the unclassified service of the state.
Vacancies in the office shall be filled by the appointing authority for the
unexpired term.
(b) An assistant state public
defender shall be a qualified attorney, licensed to practice law in this state,
serve in the unclassified service of the state if employed, and serve at the
pleasure of the appointing authority at a salary or retainer fee not to exceed
reasonable compensation for comparable services performed for other
governmental agencies or departments. Retained or part-time employed assistant
state public defenders may engage in the general practice of law. The
compensation of the chief appellate public defender and the compensation of
each assistant state public defender shall be set by the State Board of Public
Defense. The chief appellate public defender shall devote full time to the
performance of duties and shall not engage in the general practice of law.
(c) The incumbent deputy
state public defender as of December 31, 2006, shall be appointed as the chief
appellate public defender for the four-year term beginning on January 1, 2007.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.25, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Representation. (a) The state
chief appellate public defender shall represent, without charge:
(1) a defendant or other
person appealing from a conviction of a felony or gross misdemeanor;
(2) a person convicted of a
felony or gross misdemeanor who is pursuing a postconviction proceeding and who
has not already had a direct appeal of the conviction, but if the person
pled guilty and received a presumptive sentence or a downward departure in
sentence, and the state public defender reviewed the person's case and
determined that there was no basis for an appeal of the conviction or of the
sentence, then the state public defender may decline to represent the person in
a postconviction remedy case; and
(3) a child who is appealing
from a delinquency adjudication or from an extended jurisdiction juvenile
conviction.
(b) The state
chief appellate public defender may represent, without charge, all other
persons pursuing a postconviction remedy under section 590.01, who are
financially unable to obtain counsel.
(c) The state public
defender shall represent any other person, who is financially unable to obtain
counsel, when directed to do so by the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals,
except that The state chief appellate public defender shall
not represent a person in any action or proceeding in which a party is seeking
a monetary judgment, recovery or award. When requested by a district public
defender or appointed counsel, the state public defender may assist the
district public defender, appointed counsel, or an organization designated in
section 611.216 in the performance of duties, including trial representation in
matters involving legal conflicts of interest or other special circumstances,
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2576
and assistance with legal
research and brief preparation. When the state public defender is directed by a
court to represent a defendant or other person, the state public defender may
assign the representation to any district public defender.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.26, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Appointment; terms. The state Board of
Public Defense shall appoint a chief district public defender for each judicial
district. When appointing a chief district public defender, the state Board of
Public Defense membership shall be increased to include two residents of the
district appointed by the chief judge of the district to reflect the
characteristics of the population served by the public defender in that
district. The additional members shall serve only in the capacity of selecting
the district public defender. The ad hoc state Board of Public Defense shall
appoint a chief district public defender only after requesting and giving
reasonable time to receive any recommendations from the public, the local bar
association, and the judges of the district. Each chief district public
defender shall be a qualified attorney licensed to practice law in this state.
The chief district public defender shall be appointed for a term of four years,
beginning January 1, pursuant to the following staggered term schedule: (1) in 2000
2008, the second and eighth districts; (2) in 2001 2009, the
first, third, fourth, and tenth districts; (3) in 2002 2010, the
fifth and ninth districts; and (4) in 1999 2011, the sixth and
seventh districts. The chief district public defenders shall serve for
four-year terms and may be removed for cause upon the order of the state Board
of Public Defense. Vacancies in the office shall be filled by the appointing
authority for the unexpired term. The chief district public defenders shall
devote full time to the performance of duties and shall not engage in the
general practice of law.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.26, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Other employment. Chief district
public defenders and Assistant district public defenders may engage in the
general practice of law where not employed on a full-time basis.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.27, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Transcript use. If the state
chief appellate public defender or a district public defender deems it
necessary to make a motion for a new trial, to take an appeal, or other
postconviction proceedings in order to properly represent a defendant or other
person whom that public defender had been directed to represent, that public
defender may use the transcripts of the testimony and other proceedings filed
with the court administrator of the district court as provided by section
243.49.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.27, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. Public defense services; correctional
facility inmates. All billings for services rendered and ordered under
subdivision 7 shall require the approval of the chief district public defender
before being forwarded on a monthly basis to the state public defender. In
cases where adequate representation cannot be provided by the district public
defender and where counsel has been appointed under a court order, the state
public defender shall forward to the commissioner of finance all billings for
services rendered under the court order. The commissioner shall pay for services
from county criminal justice aid retained by the commissioner of revenue for
that purpose under section 477A.0121, subdivision 4, or from county program
aid retained by the commissioner of revenue for that purpose under section
477A.0124, subdivision 1, clause (4), or 477A.03, subdivision 2b, paragraph
(a).
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2577
The costs of appointed
counsel and associated services in cases arising from new criminal charges
brought against indigent inmates who are incarcerated in a Minnesota state
correctional facility are the responsibility of the state Board of Public
Defense. In such cases the state public defender may follow the procedures
outlined in this section for obtaining court-ordered counsel.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.27, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. Costs of transcripts. In appeal cases
and postconviction cases where the state appellate public
defender's office does not have sufficient funds to pay for transcripts and
other necessary expenses because it has spent or committed all of the
transcript funds in its annual budget, the state public defender may forward to
the commissioner of finance all billings for transcripts and other necessary
expenses. The commissioner shall pay for these transcripts and other necessary
expenses from county criminal justice aid retained by the commissioner of
revenue under section 477A.0121, subdivision 4, or from county program aid
retained by the commissioner of revenue for that purpose under section
477A.0124, subdivision 1, clause (4), or 477A.03, subdivision 2b,
paragraph (a).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 611.35, is amended to read:
611.35 REIMBURSEMENT OF PUBLIC DEFENDER AND APPOINTIVE
APPOINTED COUNSEL.
Subdivision 1. Reimbursement; civil obligation. Any
person who is represented by a public defender or appointive
appointed counsel shall, if financially able to pay, reimburse the
governmental unit chargeable with the compensation of such public defender
or appointive appointed counsel for the actual costs to the
governmental unit in providing the services of the public defender or
appointive appointed counsel. The court in hearing such matter shall
ascertain the amount of such costs to be charged to the defendant and shall
direct reimbursement over a period of not to exceed six months, unless the
court for good cause shown shall extend the period of reimbursement. If a term
of probation is imposed as a part of a sentence, reimbursement of costs as
required by this chapter must not be made a condition of probation.
Reimbursement of costs as required by this chapter is a civil obligation and
must not be made a condition of a criminal sentence.
Subd. 2. Civil action. The county attorney may
commence a civil action to recover such cost remaining unpaid at the expiration
of six months unless the court has extended the reimbursement period and shall,
if it appears that such recipient of public defender or appointive
appointed counsel services is about to leave the jurisdiction of the court
or sell or otherwise dispose of assets out of which reimbursement may be
obtained, commence such action forthwith. The county attorney may compromise
and settle any claim for reimbursement with the approval of the court which
heard the matter. No determination or action shall be taken later than two
years after the termination of the duties of the public defender or
appointive appointed counsel.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 37. Laws 2001, First
Special Session chapter 8, article 4, section 4, is amended to read:
Sec. 4. DISTRICT COURTS
$118,470,000 $128,842,000
Carlton County Extraordinary
Expenses.
$300,000 the first year is to reimburse Carlton county for extraordinary
expenses related to homicide trials. This is a onetime appropriation.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2578
New Judge
Units.
$774,000 the first year and $1,504,000 the second year are for an increase in
judgeship units, including one trial court judge unit beginning October 1,
2001, in the tenth judicial district, one trial court judge unit beginning April
1, 2002, in the third judicial district, one trial court judge unit beginning
July 1, 2002, in the tenth judicial district, one trial court judge unit
beginning January 1, 2003, in the seventh judicial district, and one trial
court judge unit beginning January 1, 2003, in the first judicial district.
Each judge unit consists of a judge, law clerk, and court reporter.
Alternative
Dispute Resolution Programs. A portion of this appropriation may be used for the
alternative dispute resolution programs authorized by article 5, section 18.
Supplemental
Funding for Certain Mandated Costs. $4,533,000 the first year and $6,032,000 the second
year are to supplement funding for guardians ad litem, interpreters, rule 20
and civil commitment examinations, and in forma pauperis costs in the fifth,
seventh, eighth, and ninth judicial districts.
Trial Court
Infrastructure Staff. $684,000 the first year and $925,000 the second year are for
infrastructure staff.
Court
Effectiveness Initiatives; Community Courts and Screener Collectors. $835,000 the first year and
$765,000 the second year are for court effectiveness initiatives. Of this
amount, $125,000 each year is for continued funding of the community court in
the fourth judicial district and $125,000 each year is for continued funding of
the community court in the second judicial district. These are onetime
appropriations.
The second judicial district
and fourth judicial district shall each report quarterly to the chairs and
ranking minority members of the legislative committees and divisions with
jurisdiction over criminal justice funding on:
(1) how money appropriated
for this initiative was spent; and
(2) the cooperation of other
criminal justice agencies and county units of government in the community
courts' efforts.
The first report is due on
October 1, 2001. None of this appropriation may be used for the purpose of
complying with these reporting requirements.
Of this amount, $585,000 the
first year and $515,000 the second year are for screener collector programs.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2579
The fifth, seventh, and
ninth judicial district courts shall implement screener collector programs to
enhance the collection of overdue fine revenue by at least ten percent in each
location serviced by a screener collector. By August 15, 2002, and annually
thereafter, the state court administrator shall report to the chairs and
ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees with
jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding issues on the total
amount of fines collected, the amount of overdue fines collected for the two
preceding fiscal years, and the expenditures associated with the screener
collector program.
Ninth District
County and Support Pilot Projects. Up to $99,000 each year may be used for the ninth
judicial district to implement the pilot projects on the six-month review of
child custody, parenting time, and support orders, and on the accounting for child
support by obligees.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 38. Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 2, article 1,
section 2, is amended to read:
Sec. 2. SUPREME COURT $38,806,000 $36,439,000
Report on
Court Fees. The state court
administrator shall review and report back on the financial consequences of
policy changes made in the following areas: (1) criminal and traffic offender
surcharges; (2) public defender co-pays; and (3) the use of revenue recapture
to collect the public defender co-pay. The report shall also list the local
governmental units that employ administrative procedures to collect fines for
ordinance violations. The state court administrator must submit the report to
the chairs and ranking minority members on the committees that have
jurisdiction over court funding by January 15 of each year.
$5,000 each year is for a
contingent account for expenses necessary for the normal operation of the court
for which no other reimbursement is provided.
Legal Services
to Low-Income Clients in Family Law Matters. Of this appropriation, $877,000 each year is
to improve the access of low-income clients to legal representation in family
law matters. This appropriation must be distributed under Minnesota Statutes,
section 480.242, to the qualified legal services programs described in
Minnesota Statutes, section 480.242, subdivision 2, paragraph (a). Any
unencumbered balance remaining in the first year does not cancel and is
available in the second year.
Of this appropriation,
$355,000 in fiscal year 2005 is for the implementation of the Minnesota Child
Support Act and is contingent upon its enactment. This is a onetime
appropriation.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2580
Sec. 39. PUBLIC DEFENDER STUDY AND REPORT
REQUIRED.
The State Board of Public
Defense and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners shall jointly prepare a report
to the legislature on the history of the funding of the public defender's
office in the Fourth Judicial District provided by the state and Hennepin
County. The report must compare the costs and services provided by the Fourth
Judicial District Public Defender's Office to the costs and services provided
by the state Board of Public Defense in all other public defender district
offices. The report must detail the amount of funding provided by Hennepin
County to the Fourth Judicial District Public Defender's Office and the amount
necessary for the state to assume the full costs of the public defender duties
in the Fourth Judicial District as in the other judicial districts throughout
the state. The report must also recommend specific legislation that would
provide for an appropriate resolution of the state and local funding of the
Fourth Judicial District Public Defender's Office. The report must be completed
by October 1, 2007, and be submitted to the commissioner of finance, the chairs
and ranking minority members of the senate and house committees and divisions
with jurisdiction over finance, judiciary, judiciary finance, and public safety
finance, and the house Ways and Means Committee.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 40. REPORT.
The commissioner of commerce
shall monitor compliance with the good faith obligations of insurers imposed by
Minnesota Statutes, section 604.18 and prepare a compliance report and submit
it to the house and senate standing committees with jurisdiction over insurance
matters on January 1 of each year. The commissioner shall also submit a copy of
the report to the state court administrator to assist the administrator in
monitoring the impact on the state court system of the enactment of Minnesota Statutes,
section 604.18. The report must also include the information received by the
commissioner under Minnesota Statutes, section 604.18, subdivision 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 41. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 260B.173; 480.175, subdivision 3; and 611.20, subdivision 5, are
repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
ARTICLE 6
CORRECTIONS
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 16A.72, is amended to read:
16A.72 INCOME CREDITED TO GENERAL FUND; EXCEPTIONS.
All income, including fees
or receipts of any nature, shall be credited to the general fund, except:
(1) federal aid;
(2) contributions, or reimbursements
received for any account of any division or department for which an
appropriation is made by law;
(3) income to the University
of Minnesota;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2581
(4) income to revolving
funds now established in institutions under the control of the commissioners of
corrections or human services;
(5) investment earnings
resulting from the master lease program, except that the amount credited to
another fund or account may not exceed the amount of the additional expense
incurred by that fund or account through participation in the master lease
program;
(6) investment earnings
resulting from any gift, donation, devise, endowment, trust, or court ordered
or approved escrow account or trust fund, which should be credited to the fund
or account and appropriated for the purpose for which it was received;
(7) receipts from the
operation of patients' and inmates' stores and patients' vending
machines, which shall be deposited in the social welfare fund, or in the
case of prison industries in the correctional revolving fund, in each
institution for the benefit of the patients and inmates;
(8) money received in
payment for services of inmate labor employed in the industries carried on in the
state correctional facilities which receipts shall be credited to the current
expense fund of those facilities income to prison industries which shall
be credited to the correctional industries revolving fund;
(9) as provided in sections
16B.57 and 85.22;
(10) income to the Minnesota
Historical Society;
(11) the percent of income
collected by a private collection agency and retained by the collection agency
as its collection fee; or
(12) as otherwise provided
by law.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 16B.181, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Public entities; purchases from corrections
industries. (a) The commissioner of corrections, in consultation with the
commissioner of administration, shall prepare updated lists of the items
available for purchase from Department of Corrections industries and annually
forward a copy of the most recent list to all public entities within the state.
A public entity that is supported in whole or in part with funds from the state
treasury may purchase items directly from corrections industries. The bid
solicitation process is not required for these purchases.
(b) The commissioner of
administration shall develop a contract or contracts to enable public entities
to purchase items directly from corrections industries. The commissioner of
administration, in consultation with the commissioner of corrections, shall
determine the fair market price for listed items. The commissioner of administration
shall require that all requests for bids or proposals, for items provided by
corrections industries, be forwarded to the commissioner of corrections to
enable corrections industries to submit bids. The commissioner of corrections
shall consult with the commissioner of administration prior to introducing new
products to the state agency market.
(c) No public entity may
evade the intent of this section by adopting slight variations in
specifications, when Minnesota corrections industry items meet the reasonable
needs and specifications of the public entity.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2582
(d) The commissioners of
administration and corrections shall develop annual performance measures
outlining goals to maximize inmate work program participation. The
commissioners of administration and corrections shall appoint cochairs for a
task force whose purpose is to determine additional methods to achieve the
performance goals for public entity purchasing. The task force shall include
representatives from the Minnesota House of Representatives, Minnesota Senate,
the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, University of Minnesota,
Minnesota League of Cities, Minnesota Association of Counties, and administrators
with purchasing responsibilities from the Minnesota state Departments of
Corrections, Public Safety, Finance, Transportation, Natural Resources, Human
Services, Health, and Employment and Economic Development. Notwithstanding
section 15.059, the task force created in this paragraph expires on June 30,
2003.
(e) If performance goals for
public entity purchasing are not achieved in two consecutive fiscal years,
public entities shall purchase items available from corrections industries. The
commissioner of administration shall be responsible for notifying public
entities of this requirement.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 16C.23, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Surplus property. "Surplus
property" means state or federal commodities, equipment, materials,
supplies, books, printed matter, buildings, and other personal or real property
that is obsolete, unused, not needed for a public purpose, or ineffective for
current use. Surplus property does not include products manufactured by or
held in inventory by prison industries for sale to the general public in the
normal course of its business.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.018, is amended to read:
241.018 PER DIEM CALCULATION.
Subdivision 1. State correctional facilities. (a) The commissioner of
corrections shall develop a uniform method to calculate the average
department-wide per diem cost of incarcerating offenders at state adult
correctional facilities. In addition to other costs currently factored into the
per diem, it must include an appropriate percentage of capitol costs for all
adult correctional facilities and 65 percent of the department's management
services budget.
(b) The commissioner also
shall use this method of calculating per diem costs for offenders in each state
adult correctional facility. When calculating the per diem cost of
incarcerating offenders at a particular facility, the commissioner shall
include an appropriate percentage of capital costs for the facility and an
appropriate prorated amount, given the facility's population, of 65 percent of
the department's management services budget.
(c) The commissioner shall
ensure that these new per diem methods are used in all future annual
performance reports to the legislature and are also reflected in the
department's biennial budget document.
Subd. 2. Local correctional facilities. (a) The commissioner of
corrections shall develop a uniform method to calculate the average per diem
cost of incarcerating offenders in county and regional jail facilities licensed
by the commissioner under section 241.021, subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
(b) Each county and regional
jail in the state must annually provide the commissioner with a per diem
calculation based on the formula the commissioner promulgates pursuant to
paragraph (a).
(c) The commissioner shall
include the county and regional jail per diem data collected under paragraph
(b) in the Department of Correction's annual performance report to the
legislature mandated by section 241.016.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2583
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.27, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Establishment of Minnesota correctional
industries; MINNCOR industries. For the purpose of providing
adequate, regular and suitable employment, vocational educational training,
and to aid the inmates of state correctional facilities, the commissioner of
corrections may establish, equip, maintain and operate at any correctional
facility under the commissioner's control such industrial and commercial
activities as may be deemed necessary and suitable to the profitable
employment, vocational educational training and development of
proper work habits of the inmates of state correctional facilities. The
industrial and commercial activities authorized by this section are designated
MINNCOR industries and shall be for the primary purpose of sustaining
and ensuring MINNCOR industries' self-sufficiency, providing vocational
educational training, meaningful employment and the teaching of proper
work habits to the inmates of correctional facilities under the control of the
commissioner of corrections, and not solely as competitive business
ventures. The net profits from these activities shall be used for the
benefit of the inmates as it relates to education, self-sufficiency skills, and
transition services and not to fund non-inmate-related activities or mandates. Prior
to the establishment of any industrial and commercial activity, the
commissioner of corrections may consult with representatives of business,
industry, organized labor, the state Department of Education, the state
Apprenticeship Council, the state Department of Labor and Industry, the
Department of Employment Security, the Department of Administration, and such
other persons and bodies as the commissioner may feel are qualified to
determine the quantity and nature of the goods, wares, merchandise and services
to be made or provided, and the types of processes to be used in their
manufacture, processing, repair, and production consistent with the greatest
opportunity for the reform and vocational educational training of
the inmates, and with the best interests of the state, business, industry and
labor.
The commissioner of
corrections shall, at all times in the conduct of any industrial or commercial
activity authorized by this section, utilize inmate labor to the greatest
extent feasible, provided, however, that the commissioner may employ all
administrative, supervisory and other skilled workers necessary to the proper
instruction of the inmates and the profitable and efficient operation of the
industrial and commercial activities authorized by this section.
Additionally, the
commissioner of corrections may authorize the director of any correctional
facility under the commissioner's control to accept work projects from outside
sources for processing, fabrication or repair, provided that preference shall
be given to the performance of such work projects for state departments and
agencies.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.27, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Revolving fund; use of fund. There is
established in the Department of Corrections under the control of the
commissioner of corrections the Minnesota correctional industries revolving fund
to which shall be transferred the revolving funds authorized in Minnesota
Statutes 1978, sections 243.41 and 243.85, clause (f), and any other industrial
revolving funds heretofore established at any state correctional facility under
the control of the commissioner of corrections. The revolving fund established
shall be used for the conduct of the industrial and commercial activities now
or hereafter established at any state correctional facility, including but not
limited to the purchase of equipment, raw materials, the payment of salaries,
wages and other expenses necessary and incident thereto. The purchase of services,
materials, and commodities used in and held for resale are
not subject to the competitive bidding procedures of section 16C.06, but are
subject to all other provisions of chapters 16B and 16C, unless otherwise
identified. When practical, purchases must be made from small targeted
group businesses designated under section 16C.16. Additionally, the expenses of
inmate vocational educational training, self-sufficiency
skills, transition services, and the inmate release fund may be financed
from the correctional industries revolving fund in an amount to be determined
by the commissioner or the MINNCOR chief executive officer as duly appointed
by the commissioner. The proceeds and income from all industrial and
commercial activities
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2584
conducted at state
correctional facilities shall be deposited in the correctional industries
revolving fund subject to disbursement as hereinabove provided. The
commissioner of corrections may request that money in the fund be invested
pursuant to section 11A.25; the proceeds from the investment not currently needed
shall be accounted for separately and credited to the fund.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.27, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Disbursement from fund. The
correctional industries revolving fund shall be deposited in the state treasury
and paid out only on proper vouchers as may be authorized and approved by the
commissioner of corrections, and in the same manner and under the same
restrictions as are now provided by law for the disbursement of funds by the
commissioner. An amount deposited in the state treasury equal to six months
of net operating cash as determined by the prior 12 months of revenue and cash
flow statements, shall be restricted for use only by correctional industries as
described under subdivision 2. For purposes of this subdivision, "net
operating cash" means net income minus sales plus cost of goods sold. Cost
of goods sold include all direct costs of correctional industry products
attributable to their production. The commissioner of corrections is
authorized to keep and maintain at any correctional facility under the
commissioner's control a contingent fund, as provided in section 241.13; but
the contingent fund shall at all times be covered and protected by a proper and
sufficient bond to be duly approved as by law now provided.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.27, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Revolving fund; borrowing. The
commissioner of corrections is authorized, when in the commissioner's judgment
it becomes necessary in order to meet current demands on the correctional
industries revolving fund, to borrow sums of money as may be necessary. The
sums so borrowed shall not exceed, in any one year, 50 percent of the total
of the net worth of correctional industries six months of net operating
cash as determined by the previous 12 months of the correctional industries'
revenue and cash flow statements.
When the commissioner of
corrections shall certify to the commissioner of finance that, in the
commissioner's judgment, it is necessary to borrow a specified sum of money in
order to meet the current demands on the correctional industries revolving
fund, and the commissioner of finance may, in the commissioner's discretion,
transfer and credit to the correctional industries revolving fund, from any
moneys in the state treasury not required for immediate disbursement, the whole
or such part of the amount so certified as they deem advisable, which sum so
transferred shall be repaid by the commissioner from the revolving fund to the
fund from which transferred, at such time as shall be specified by the
commissioner of finance, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall
be specified by the commissioner of finance, not exceeding four percent per
annum. When any transfer shall so have been made to the correctional industries
revolving fund, the commissioner of finance shall notify the commissioner of
corrections of the amount so transferred to the credit of the correctional
industries revolving fund, the date when the same is to be repaid, and the rate
of interest so to be paid.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.278, is amended to read:
241.278 AGREEMENTS FOR WORK FORCE OF STATE OR COUNTY JAIL INMATES.
The commissioner of
corrections, in the interest of inmate rehabilitation or to promote programs
under section 241.275, subdivision 2, may enter into interagency agreements
with state, county, or municipal agencies, or contract with nonprofit agencies
to manage, fund, or partially fund the cost of programs that use
state or county jail inmates
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2585
as a work force. The
commissioner is authorized to receive funds via these agreements and these
funds are appropriated to the commissioner for community service programming
or when prison industries are party to the agreement, shall be deposited in the
Minnesota correctional industries revolving fund for use as described under
section 241.27, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.69, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Transfer. If the licensed mental health
professional finds the person to be a person who is mentally ill and in need of
short-term care, the examining licensed mental health care
professional may recommend transfer by the commissioner of corrections to the
mental health unit established pursuant to subdivision 1.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 241.69, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Commitment. If the examining
licensed mental health care professional or licensed mental health
professional finds the person to be a person who is mentally ill and in need of
long-term care in a hospital, or if an inmate transferred pursuant to
subdivision 3 refuses to voluntarily participate in the treatment program at
the mental health unit, the director of psychological services of the
institution or the mental health professional shall initiate proceedings for
judicial commitment as provided in section 253B.07. Upon the recommendation of
the licensed mental health professional and upon completion of the hearing and
consideration of the record, the court may commit the person to the mental
health unit established in subdivision 1 or to another hospital. A person
confined in a state correctional institution for adults who has been
adjudicated to be a person who is mentally ill and in need of treatment may be
committed to the commissioner of corrections and placed in the mental health
unit established in subdivision 1.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 383A.08, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Rules and regulations. The county may
promulgate rules and regulations for the proper operation and maintenance of
each facility and the proper care and discipline of inmates detained in the
facility. These rules and regulations may, among other things, provide for the
diminution of sentences of inmates for good behavior, but in no event to
exceed a total of five days for each 30 day sentence in accordance with
section 643.29.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 383A.08, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Confinement of inmates from other counties.
The county may accept an inmate for confinement at a county correction facility
when the inmate is committed to the facility by order of a judge of a
municipality or county outside Ramsey County if the county is paid the amount
of compensation for board, confinement, and maintenance of the inmate
that it determines. No compensation of this kind may be in an amount less
than the actual per diem cost per person confined. A county outside Ramsey
County or a municipality outside Ramsey County may enter into and agree with
Ramsey County for the incarceration of prisoners.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2586
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 401.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Certified statements; determinations;
adjustments. On or before Within 60 days of the end of each
calendar quarter, participating counties which have received the payments
authorized by section 401.14 shall submit to the commissioner certified
statements detailing the amounts expended and costs incurred in furnishing the
correctional services provided in sections 401.01 to 401.16. Upon receipt of
certified statements, the commissioner shall, in the manner provided in
sections 401.10 and 401.12, determine the amount each participating county is
entitled to receive, making any adjustments necessary to rectify any disparity
between the amounts received pursuant to the estimate provided in section
401.14 and the amounts actually expended. If the amount received pursuant to
the estimate is greater than the amount actually expended during the quarter,
the commissioner may withhold the difference from any subsequent monthly payments
made pursuant to section 401.14. Upon certification by the commissioner of the
amount a participating county is entitled to receive under the provisions of
section 401.14 or of this subdivision the commissioner of finance shall
thereupon issue a state warrant to the chief fiscal officer of each
participating county for the amount due together with a copy of the certificate
prepared by the commissioner.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 641.15, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3a. Intake procedure; approved mental health screening. As
part of its intake procedure for new prisoners, the sheriff or local
corrections shall use a mental health screening tool approved by the
commissioner of corrections in consultation with the commissioner of human
services to identify persons who may have mental illness.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2007.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 641.265, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Withdrawal. A county board may withdraw
from cooperation in a regional jail system if the county boards of all of
the other cooperating counties decide, by majority vote, to allow the
withdrawal in accordance with the terms of a joint powers agreement.
With the approval of the county board of each cooperating county, the regional
jail board shall fix the sum, if any, to be paid to the county withdrawing, to
reimburse it for capital cost, debt service, or lease rental payments made by
the county prior to withdrawal, in excess of its proportionate share of
benefits from the regional jail prior to withdrawal, and the time and manner of
making the payments. The payments shall be deemed additional payments of
capital cost, debt service, or lease rentals to be made proportionately by the
remaining counties and, when received, shall be deposited in and paid from the
regional jail fund; provided that:
(a) (1) payments shall not
be made from any amounts in the regional jail fund which are needed for
maintenance and operation expenses or lease rentals currently due and payable;
and
(b) (2) the withdrawing
county shall remain obligated for the payment of its proportionate share of any
lease rentals due and payable after its withdrawal, in the event and up to the
amount of any lease payment not made when due by one or more of the other
cooperating counties.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2587
Sec. 17. DISCIPLINARY CONFINEMENT; PROTOCOL.
The commissioner of
corrections shall develop a protocol that is fair, firm, and consistent so that
inmates have an opportunity to be released from disciplinary confinement in a
timely manner. For those inmates in disciplinary confinement who are nearing
their release date, the commissioner of corrections shall, when possible,
develop a reentry plan.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 18. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 241.021, subdivision 5; and 241.85, subdivision 2, are repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
ARTICLE 7
OFFENDER RE-ENTRY POLICY
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 241.016, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Biennial report. (a) The Department of
Corrections shall submit a performance report to the chairs and ranking
minority members of the senate and house committees and divisions having
jurisdiction over criminal justice funding by January 15, 2005, and every other
year thereafter. The issuance and content of the report must include the
following:
(1) department strategic
mission, goals, and objectives;
(2) the department-wide per
diem, adult facility-specific per diems, and an average per diem, reported in a
standard calculated method as outlined in the departmental policies and
procedures;
(3) department annual
statistics as outlined in the departmental policies and procedures; and
(4) information about
prison-based mental health programs, including, but not limited to, the
availability of these programs, participation rates, and completion rates.
(b) The department shall
maintain recidivism rates for adult facilities on an annual basis. In addition,
each year the department shall, on an alternating basis, complete a recidivism
analysis of adult facilities, juvenile services, and the community services
divisions and include a three-year recidivism analysis in the report described
in paragraph (a). When appropriate, The recidivism analysis must include:
(1) assess education programs, vocational programs, treatment programs,
including mental health programs, industry, and employment; and (2) assess
statewide re-entry policies and funding, including postrelease treatment,
education, training, and supervision. In addition, when reporting
recidivism for the department's adult and juvenile facilities, the department
shall report on the extent to which offenders it has assessed as chemically
dependent commit new offenses, with separate recidivism rates reported for
persons completing and not completing the department's treatment programs.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2588
Sec. 2. [241.86] FIVE-YEAR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOR HIGH-RISK ADULTS.
Subdivision 1. Definition. For purposes of this section, "high-risk
adult" means an adult with a history of some combination of substance
abuse, mental illness, chronic unemployment, incarceration, or homelessness.
High-risk adults are considered to be very likely to enter or reenter state or
county correctional programs or chemical or mental health programs.
Subd. 2. Establishment. (a) The Department of Corrections shall
contract with one nonprofit entity to conduct this five-year demonstration
project and document the effectiveness of this model. Initially, the
demonstration will operate in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
(b) The contractor must, at
a minimum, meet the following criteria:
(1) be an incorporated,
nonprofit organization that is capable of managing and operating a
multidisciplinary model for providing high-risk adults with housing, short-term
work, health care, behavioral health care, and community reengagement;
(2) demonstrate an ability
to organize and manage an alliance of nonprofit organizations providing
services to high-risk adults;
(3) have organizational leaders
with a demonstrated ability to organize, manage, and lead service teams
consisting of workers from multiple service providers that deliver direct
support to high-risk adults;
(4) have experience with
providing a comprehensive set of housing, work, health care, behavioral health
care, and community reengagement services to high-risk adults; and
(5) be a recipient of
foundation and other private funds for the refinement and testing of a
demonstration of this type.
Subd. 3. Scope of the five-year demonstration project. The
contractor undertaking this five-year demonstration project shall, as part of
this project:
(1) enroll up to 500
eligible high-risk adults over the five-year demonstration project period,
starting December 1, 2007, and ending December 31, 2012;
(2) using best practices
derived from research and testing, provide or assist in arranging access to
services for high-risk adults enrolled in the demonstration project, including,
at a minimum, housing, behavioral health services, health care, employment, and
community and family reengagement;
(3) maximize the performance
of existing services and programs by coordinating access to and the delivery of
these services; and
(4) define conditions under
which enrollees are considered to be in good standing and allowed to remain in
the demonstration project. These conditions may include, but are not limited
to:
(i) living in stable and
safe housing;
(ii) working and earning an
income;
(iii) paying child support,
if appropriate;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2589
(iv) participating in
treatment programs, if appropriate; and
(v) no arrests.
Subd. 4. Payment. The commissioner shall pay from grant funds for
this demonstration project, to the entity under contract, a monthly flat fee of
$1,600 for every enrollee who is in good standing in the demonstration project.
Subd. 5. Report. (a) The entity shall submit annually a report to
the commissioners of corrections, human services, employment and economic
development, and housing finance and the legislature on or before January 15 of
each year, beginning January 15, 2008. The report must include:
(1) the number of
participants who have been enrolled and the number currently participating in
the demonstration project;
(2) a description of the
services provided to enrollees over the past year and over the duration of the
demonstration project to date;
(3) an accounting of the
costs associated with the enrollees over the past year and over the duration of
the demonstration project to date; and
(4) any other information
requested by the commissioners of corrections, housing, employment and economic
development, and human services and the legislature.
(b) The report shall include
recommendations on improving and expanding the project to other geographical
areas of the state.
(c) The report shall include
an update on the status of the independent evaluation required in subdivision
7.
Subd. 6. Independent evaluation. An independent evaluator selected
by the commissioner of corrections, in consultation with the contractor
conducting the project, must conduct an evaluation of the project. The
independent evaluator must complete and submit a report of findings and
recommendations to the commissioners of corrections, housing finance, human
services, education, and employment and economic development and the
legislature. This independent evaluation must be developed and implemented
concurrently with the five-year demonstration project, beginning on December 1,
2007. The final report to the legislature is due on or before January 15, 2013.
Subd. 7. Sunset. This section expires December 31, 2013.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 3. [299A.82] MENTORING GRANT FOR CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS.
Subdivision 1. Mentoring grant. The commissioner of corrections shall
award grants to nonprofit organizations that provide one-to-one mentoring
relationships to youth enrolled between the ages of seven to 13 whose parent or
other significant family member is incarcerated in a county workhouse, county
jail, state prison, or other type of correctional facility or is subject to
correctional supervision. The intent of the grant is to provide children with
adult mentors to strengthen developmental outcomes, including enhanced
self-confidence and esteem; improved academic performance; and improved
relationships with peers, family, and other adults that may prevent them from
entering the juvenile justice system.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2590
Subd. 2. Grant criteria. As a condition of receiving the grant,
the grant recipient must:
(1) collaborate with other
organizations that have a demonstrated history of providing services to youth
and families in disadvantaged situations;
(2) implement procedures to
ensure that 100 percent of the mentors pose no safety risk to the child and
have the skills to participate in a mentoring relationship;
(3) provide enhanced training
to mentors focusing on asset building and family dynamics when a parent is
incarcerated; and
(4) provide an individual
family plan and aftercare.
Subd. 3. Program evaluation. The grant recipient must submit an
evaluation plan to the commissioner delineating the program and student outcome
goals and activities implemented to achieve the stated outcomes. The goals must
be clearly stated and measurable. The grant recipient must collect, analyze,
and report on participation and outcome data that enable the department to
verify that the program goals were met.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 4. LEGISLATIVE WORKING GROUP ON OFFENDER RE-ENTRY.
(a) The chairs of the house
of representatives Public Safety Finance Committee and the senate Public Safety
Budget Division, or their designees, shall co-chair an offender re-entry
working group. The working group shall review, examine, and, where the group
deems necessary, formulate legislative proposals addressing the following issues:
(1) the Department of
Corrections' role in offender re-entry, including prerelease and postrelease
planning, education, treatment, housing, and employment;
(2) housing for offenders
upon release from prison, including offender housing plans and the need for and
placement of halfway houses;
(3) the Department of Human
Services and the Department of Housing Finance Administration's role in
assisting recently released offenders with housing and mental health services;
(4) prerelease and
postrelease offender drug treatment policies, programs, and funding;
(5) drug sentencing,
including an assessment of the costs and benefits of adjusting drug weight
thresholds in controlled substance offenses in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 152,
and the proportionality of Minnesota's drug sentences as compared to sentences
for other Minnesota offenses and drug sentences in other states in the upper
midwest;
(6) creation of an early
discharge committee to recommend the release of offenders who make significant
and measurable progress in treatment, education, job skill training, and
overall behavior before their term of imprisonment expires;
(7) defining the class of
offenders who are eligible for early release, if an early discharge committee
is recommended;
(8) establishing re-entry
courts to oversee postprison supervision of offenders;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2591
(9) how the current system
of probation supervision affects recidivism and if the system needs to be
reformed;
(10) the need for and value
of collateral employment sanctions associated with certain offenses;
(11) juvenile offender
re-entry;
(12) extending tax credits
to businesses that employ offenders recently released from prison; and
(13) any other matter
relevant to promoting successful offender re-entry.
(b) At the invitation of the
co-chairs, the group shall include members of the house of representatives and
senate and representatives from the Department of Corrections, the Sentencing Guidelines
Commission, the courts, law enforcement, probation, county attorneys, the Board
of Public Defense, Private Criminal Defense Bar, and the Minnesota
Comprehensive Offender Re-entry Plan Steering Committee.
(c) The house of
representatives co-chair shall convene and lead the first session of the
working group on or before August 1, 2007. The co-chairs or their designees
shall alternate leading working group sessions. The group shall meet at least
twice a month.
(d) The working group shall
develop policy recommendations by November 1, 2007, and prepare draft
legislation on or before December 15, 2007.
(e) Legislative staff is
authorized to assist the working group, as the co-chairs deem necessary.
(f) The working group
expires on December 15, 2007.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 5. RE-ENTRY GRANT ADDRESSING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND INTIMATE PARTNER
VIOLENCE.
Subdivision 1. Re-entry grant. The commissioner of corrections shall award
a grant to a nonprofit having a section 501(c)(3) status with the Internal
Revenue Service or a public or private institution of higher education that has
expertise in addressing the intersection between offender re-entry and domestic
violence. The intent of the grant is to provide services to re-entering
offenders and their intimate partners to: (1) reduce the incidence of domestic
violence among offenders re-entering the community; (2) reduce occurrences of
domestic violence, serious injury, and death experienced by intimate partners
who are in relationships with offenders recently released from jail or prison;
and (3) reduce criminal recidivism due to domestic violence.
Subd. 2. Grant criteria. As a condition of receiving the grant,
the grant recipient must:
(1) subcontract with at
least one community-based domestic abuse counseling or educational program and
at least one crime victim service provider to provide comprehensive services to
recently released offenders and their intimate partners;
(2) train the organizations
selected pursuant to clause (1) on research-based practices and best practices
in addressing the intersection of offender re-entry and domestic violence; and
(3) serve as liaison to the
department of corrections and provide technical assistance, training, and
coordination to the organizations selected pursuant to clause (1) in
implementing policies that address the intersection of offender re-entry and
domestic violence.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2592
Subd. 3. Program evaluation. The grant recipient must rigorously
evaluate the effectiveness of its intervention and work with subcontracted
organizations to collect data. The grant recipient must submit an evaluation
plan to the commissioner of corrections delineating project goals and specific
activities performed to achieve those goals.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 6. PILOT PROJECT.
(a) The commissioner of corrections
shall issue a grant to a nonprofit organization to establish a pilot project to
provide employment services to ex-criminal offenders living in the North
Minneapolis community. The pilot project must provide the ex-offender
participants with a continuum of employment services that identifies their
needs; intervenes with them through case management if they are struggling; and
provides them with work readiness, skill training, chemical and mental health
referrals, housing support, job placement, work experience, and job retention
support. The pilot project shall work with community corrections officials,
faith-based organizations, and businesses to create an array of support
opportunities for the participants.
(b) By January 15, 2010, the
commissioner of corrections shall report to the chairs and ranking minority
members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions
having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding on the activities
conducted by the grant recipient and the effectiveness of the pilot project.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
ARTICLE 8
PUBLIC SAFETY AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 13.87, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Criminal history data. (a) Definition. For purposes of this
subdivision, "criminal history data" means all data maintained in
criminal history records compiled by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and
disseminated through the criminal justice information system, including, but
not limited to fingerprints, photographs, identification data, arrest data,
prosecution data, criminal court data, custody and supervision data.
(b) Classification. Criminal history data maintained by agencies,
political subdivisions and statewide systems are classified as private,
pursuant to section 13.02, subdivision 12, except that data created, collected,
or maintained by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension that identify an
individual who was convicted of a crime, the offense of which the individual
was convicted, associated court disposition and sentence information,
controlling agency, and confinement information are public data for 15 years
following the discharge of the sentence imposed for the offense. When an
innocent party's name is associated with a criminal history, and a
determination has been made through a fingerprint verification that the
innocent party is not the subject of the criminal history, the name may be
redacted from the public criminal history data. The name shall be retained in
the criminal history and classified as private data.
The Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension shall provide to the public at the central office of the bureau
the ability to inspect in person, at no charge, through a computer monitor the
criminal conviction data classified as public under this subdivision.
(c) Limitation. Nothing in paragraph (a) or (b) shall limit public
access to data made public by section 13.82.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2593
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 243.167, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definition. As used in this section,
"crime against the person" means a violation of any of the following
or a similar law of another state or of the United States: section 609.165;
609.185; 609.19; 609.195; 609.20; 609.205; 609.221; 609.222; 609.223; 609.2231;
609.224, subdivision 2 or 4; 609.2242, subdivision 2 or 4; 609.2247;
609.235; 609.245, subdivision 1; 609.25; 609.255; 609.3451, subdivision 2;
609.498, subdivision 1; 609.582, subdivision 1; or 617.23, subdivision 2; or
any felony-level violation of section 609.229; 609.377; 609.749; or 624.713.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment, and applies retroactively to
crimes committed on or after August 1, 2005.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 244.05, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. Random searches. (a) This subdivision applies to inmates
who were convicted of and imprisoned for a violent crime, as defined in section
609.1095, involving the sale, use, or possession of a controlled substance or a
dangerous weapon.
(b) When an inmate is
released on supervised release or parole, the inmate, as a condition of
release, consents to a search of the inmate's person and any motor vehicle
driven by the inmate. The search may be conducted on demand by any parole or
supervised release agent or peace officer.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 299A.641, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Membership. The oversight council shall
consist of the following individuals or their designees:
(1) the director of the
office of special investigations as the representative of the commissioner of
corrections;
(2) the superintendent of
the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension as the representative of the commissioner
of public safety;
(3) the attorney general;
(4) eight chiefs of police,
selected by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association, two of which must be
selected from cities with populations greater than 200,000;
(5) eight sheriffs, selected
by the Minnesota Sheriffs Association to represent each district, two of which
must be selected from counties with populations greater than 500,000;
(6) the United States
attorney for the district of Minnesota;
(7) two county attorneys,
selected by the Minnesota County Attorneys Association;
(8) a command-level
representative of a gang strike force;
(9) a representative from a
drug task force, selected by the Minnesota State Association of Narcotics
Investigators;
(10) a representative from
the United States Drug Enforcement Administration;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2594
(11) a representative from
the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms;
(12) a representative from
the Federal Bureau of Investigation;
(13) a tribal peace officer,
selected by the Minnesota Tribal Law Enforcement Association; and
(14) two additional members
who may be selected by the oversight council;
(15) a senator who serves on
the committee having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy, chosen by the
Subcommittee on Committees of the senate Committee on Rules and Administration;
and
(16) a representative who
serves on the committee having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy,
chosen by the speaker of the house of representatives.
The oversight council may
adopt procedures to govern its conduct as necessary and may select a chair from
among its members. The legislative members of the council may not vote on
matters before the council.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 299C.65, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Task force. (a) The policy group
shall appoint A task force to shall assist them the
policy group in their its duties. The task force shall
monitor, review, and report to the policy group on CriMNet-related projects and
provide oversight to ongoing operations as directed by the policy group. The
task force shall consist of the following members:
(1) two sheriffs
recommended members appointed by the Minnesota Sheriffs Association,
at least one of whom must be a sheriff;
(2) two police chiefs
recommended members appointed by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police
Association, at least one of whom must be a chief of police;
(3) two county attorneys
recommended members appointed by the Minnesota County Attorneys
Association, at least one of whom must be a county attorney;
(4) two city attorneys
recommended members appointed by the Minnesota League of Cities representing
the interests of city attorneys, at least one of whom must be a city attorney;
(5) two public defenders
members appointed by the Board of Public Defense, at least one of whom
must be a public defender;
(6) two district judges
appointed by the Judicial Council, one of whom is currently assigned to the
juvenile court at least one of whom has experience dealing with juvenile
court matters;
(7) two community
corrections administrators recommended appointed by the Minnesota
Association of Counties, representing the interests of local
corrections, at least one of whom represents a community corrections act
county;
(8) two probation officers
appointed by the commissioner of corrections in consultation with the president
of the Minnesota Association of Community Corrections Act Counties and the
president of the Minnesota Association of County Probation Officers;
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2595
(9) four public members appointed
by the governor for a term of six years, one of whom has been a victim
of crime represents the interests of victims, and two who
of whom are representatives of the private business community who have
expertise in integrated information systems and who for the purpose of meetings
of the full task force may be compensated pursuant to section 15.059;
(10) two court
administrators members appointed by the Minnesota Association for Court
Management, at least one of whom must be a court administrator;
(11) one member of the house
of representatives appointed by the speaker of the house;
(12) one member of the
senate appointed by the majority leader;
(13) one member appointed
by the attorney general or a designee;
(14) two individuals
recommended elected officials appointed by the Minnesota League of
Cities, one of whom works or resides in greater Minnesota and one of whom works
or resides in the seven-county metropolitan area;
(15) two individuals
recommended elected officials appointed by the Minnesota Association
of Counties, one of whom works or resides in greater Minnesota and one of whom
works or resides in the seven-county metropolitan area;
(16) the director of the
Sentencing Guidelines Commission or a designee;
(17) one member appointed by
the state chief information officer;
(18) one member appointed by
the commissioner of public safety;
(19) one member appointed by
the commissioner of corrections;
(20) one member appointed by
the commissioner of administration; and
(21) one member appointed by
the chief justice of the Supreme Court.
(b) In making these
appointments, the appointing authority shall select members with expertise in
integrated data systems or best practices.
(c) The commissioner of
public safety may appoint additional, nonvoting members to the task force as
necessary from time to time.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 299C.65, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Review of funding and grant requests.
(a) The Criminal and Juvenile Justice Information Policy Group shall review the
funding requests for criminal justice information systems from state, county,
and municipal government agencies. The policy group shall review the requests
for compatibility to statewide criminal justice information system standards.
The review shall be forwarded to the chairs and ranking minority members of the
house and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over criminal
justice funding and policy.
(b) The CriMNet program
office, in consultation with the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Information Task
Force and with the approval of the policy group, shall create the requirements
for any grant request and determine the integration priorities for the grant
period. The CriMNet program office shall also review the requests submitted for
compatibility to statewide criminal justice information systems standards.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2596
(c) The task force shall
review funding requests for criminal justice information systems grants and
make recommendations to the policy group. The policy group shall review the
recommendations of the task force and shall make a final recommendation for
criminal justice information systems grants to be made by the commissioner of
public safety. Within the limits of available state appropriations and federal
grants, the commissioner of public safety shall make grants for projects that
have been recommended by the policy group.
(d) The policy group may
approve grants only if the applicant provides an appropriate share of matching
funds as determined by the policy group to help pay up to one-half of the costs
of the grant request. The matching requirement must be constant for all counties
applicants within each grant offering. The policy group shall adopt
policies concerning the use of in-kind resources to satisfy the match
requirement and the sources from which matching funds may be obtained. Local
operational or technology staffing costs may be considered as meeting this
match requirement. Each grant recipient shall certify to the policy group that
it has not reduced funds from local, county, federal, or other sources which,
in the absence of the grant, would have been made available to the grant
recipient to improve or integrate criminal justice technology.
(e) All grant recipients
shall submit to the CriMNet program office all requested documentation
including grant status, financial reports, and a final report evaluating how
the grant funds improved the agency's criminal justice integration priorities.
The CriMNet program office shall establish the recipient's reporting dates at
the time funds are awarded.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2007.
Sec. 7. [299F.850] CIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Scope. The terms used in sections 299F.850 to 299F.858
have the meanings given them in this section.
Subd. 2. Agent. "Agent" means any person licensed by the
commissioner of revenue to purchase and affix adhesive or meter stamps on
packages of cigarettes.
Subd. 3. Cigarette. "Cigarette" means any roll for
smoking made wholly or in part of tobacco, the wrapper or cover of which is
made of paper or any other substance or material except tobacco.
Subd. 4. Manufacturer. "Manufacturer" means:
(1) any entity that
manufactures or otherwise produces cigarettes or causes cigarettes to be
manufactured or produced anywhere that the manufacturer intends to be sold in the
state, including cigarettes intended to be sold in the United States through an
importer;
(2) the first purchaser
anywhere that intends to resell in the United States cigarettes manufactured
anywhere that the original manufacturer or maker does not intend to be sold in
the United States; or
(3) any entity that becomes
a successor of an entity described in clause (1) or (2).
Subd. 5. Quality control and quality assurance program. "Quality
control and quality assurance program" means the laboratory procedures
implemented to ensure that operator bias, systematic and nonsystematic
methodological errors, and equipment-related problems do not affect the results
of the testing. This program ensures that the testing repeatability remains
within the required repeatability values stated in section 299F.851,
subdivision 1, paragraph (g), for all test trials used to certify cigarettes in
accordance with sections 299F.850 to 299F.858.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2597
Subd. 6. Repeatability. "Repeatability" means the range
of values within which the repeat results of cigarette test trials from a
single laboratory will fall 95 percent of the time.
Subd. 7. Retail dealer. "Retail dealer" means any person,
other than a wholesale dealer, engaged in selling cigarettes or tobacco
products.
Subd. 8. Sale. "Sale" means any transfer of title or
possession or both, exchange or barter, conditional or otherwise, in any manner
or by any means whatever or any agreement therefore. In addition to cash and
credit sales, the giving of cigarettes as samples, prizes, or gifts and the
exchanging of cigarettes for any consideration other than money, are considered
sales.
Subd. 9. Sell. "Sell" means to make a sale or to offer
or agree to make a sale.
Subd. 10. Wholesale dealer. "Wholesale dealer" means any
person (1) who sells cigarettes or tobacco products to retail dealers or other
persons for purposes of resale or (2) who owns, operates, or maintains one or
more cigarette or tobacco product vending machines in, at, or upon premises
owned or occupied by any other person.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Sec. 8. [299F.851] TEST METHOD AND PERFORMANCE STANDARD.
Subdivision 1. Requirements. (a) Except as provided in this subdivision,
no cigarettes may be sold or offered for sale in this state or offered for sale
or sold to persons located in this state unless (1) the cigarettes have been
tested in accordance with the test method and have met the performance standard
specified in this section, (2) a written certification has been filed by the
manufacturer with the state fire marshal in accordance with section 299F.852,
and (3) the cigarettes have been marked in accordance with section 299F.853.
(b) Testing of cigarettes
must be conducted in accordance with the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) standard E2187-04, "Standard Test Method for Measuring
the Ignition Strength of Cigarettes."
(c) Testing must be
conducted on ten layers of filter paper.
(d) No more than 25 percent
of the cigarettes tested in a test trial in accordance with this section may
exhibit full-length burns. Forty replicate tests comprise a complete test trial
for each cigarette tested.
(e) The performance standard
required by this subdivision must only be applied to a complete test trial.
(f) Written certifications
must be based upon testing conducted by a laboratory that has been accredited
pursuant to standard ISO/IEC 17025 of the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO), or other comparable accreditation standard required by
the state fire marshal.
(g) Laboratories conducting
testing in accordance with this section shall implement a quality control and
quality assurance program that includes a procedure that will determine the
repeatability of the testing results. The repeatability value must be no
greater than 0.19.
(h) This subdivision does not
require additional testing if cigarettes are tested consistent with sections
299F.850 to 299F.858 for any other purpose.
(i) Testing performed or
sponsored by the state fire marshal to determine a cigarette's compliance with
the performance standard required must be conducted in accordance with this
section.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2598
Subd. 2. Permeability bands. Each cigarette listed in a
certification submitted pursuant to section 299F.852 that uses lowered
permeability bands in the cigarette paper to achieve compliance with the
performance standard set forth in this section must have at least two nominally
identical bands on the paper surrounding the tobacco column. At least one
complete band must be located at least 15 millimeters from the lighting end of
the cigarette. For cigarettes on which the bands are positioned by design,
there must be at least two bands fully located at least 15 millimeters from the
lighting end and ten millimeters from the filter end of the tobacco column, or
ten millimeters from the labeled end of the tobacco column for nonfiltered
cigarettes.
Subd. 3. Equivalent test methods. A manufacturer of a cigarette
that the state fire marshal determines cannot be tested in accordance with the
test method prescribed in subdivision 1, paragraph (b), shall propose a test
method and performance standard for the cigarette to the state fire marshal.
Upon approval of the proposed test method and a determination by the state fire
marshal that the performance standard proposed by the manufacturer is
equivalent to the performance standard prescribed in subdivision 1, paragraph
(d), the manufacturer may employ such test method and performance standard to
certify the cigarette pursuant to section 299F.852. If the state fire marshal
determines that another state has enacted reduced cigarette ignition propensity
standards that include a test method and performance standard that are the same
as those contained in this subdivision, and the state fire marshal finds that
the officials responsible for implementing those requirements have approved the
proposed alternative test method and performance standard for a particular
cigarette proposed by a manufacturer as meeting the fire safety standards of that
state's law or regulation under a legal provision comparable to this
subdivision, then the state fire marshal shall authorize that manufacturer to
employ the alternative test method and performance standard to certify that
cigarette for sale in this state, unless the state fire marshal demonstrates a
reasonable basis why the alternative test should not be accepted under sections
299F.850 to 299F.858. All other applicable requirements of this section apply
to the manufacturer.
Subd. 4. Civil penalty. Each manufacturer shall maintain copies of
the reports of all tests conducted on all cigarettes offered for sale for a
period of three years, and shall make copies of these reports available to the
state fire marshal and the attorney general upon written request. Any
manufacturer who fails to make copies of these reports available within 60 days
of receiving a written request is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$10,000 for each day after the 60th day that the manufacturer does not make
such copies available.
Subd. 5. Future ASTM Standards. The state fire marshal may adopt a
subsequent ASTM Standard Test Method for Measuring the Ignition Strength of
Cigarettes upon a finding that the subsequent method does not result in a
change in the percentage of full-length burns exhibited by any tested cigarette
when compared to the percentage of full-length burns the same cigarette would
exhibit when tested in accordance with ASTM Standard E2187-04 and the
performance standard in subdivision 1, paragraph (d).
Subd. 6. Report to legislature. The state fire marshal shall
review the effectiveness of this section and report findings every three years
to the legislature and, if appropriate, make recommendations for legislation to
improve the effectiveness of this section. The report and legislative
recommendations must be submitted no later than January 2 of each three-year
period.
Subd. 7. Inventory before state standards. The requirements of
subdivision 1 do not prohibit wholesale or retail dealers from selling their
existing inventory of cigarettes on or after the effective date of this section
if the wholesale or retail dealer can establish that state tax stamps were
affixed to the cigarettes before the effective date of this section, and if the
wholesale or retail dealer can establish that the inventory was purchased
before the effective date of this section in comparable quantity to the
inventory purchased during the same period of the previous year.
Subd. 8. Implementation. This section must be implemented in accordance
with the implementation and substance of the New York "Fire Safety
Standards for Cigarettes."
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2599
Sec. 9. [299F.852] CERTIFICATION AND PRODUCT CHANGE.
Subdivision 1. Attestation. Each manufacturer shall submit to the state
fire marshal a written certification attesting that:
(1) each cigarette listed in
the certification has been tested in accordance with section 299F.851; and
(2) each cigarette listed in
the certification meets the performance standard set forth in section 299F.851,
subdivision 1, paragraph (d).
Subd. 2. Description. Each cigarette listed in the certification
must be described with the following information:
(1) brand, or trade name on
the package;
(2) style, such as light or
ultra light;
(3) length in millimeters;
(4) circumference in
millimeters;
(5) flavor, such as menthol
or chocolate, if applicable;
(6) filter or nonfilter;
(7) package description,
such as soft pack or box;
(8) marking approved in
accordance with section 299F.853;
(9) the name, address, and telephone
number of the laboratory, if different than the manufacturer that conducted the
test; and
(10) the date that the
testing occurred.
Subd. 3. Information availability. The certifications must be made
available to the attorney general for purposes consistent with this section and
the commissioner of revenue for the purposes of ensuring compliance with this
subdivision.
Subd. 4. Recertification. Each cigarette certified under this
subdivision must be recertified every three years.
Subd. 5. Fee. For each cigarette listed in a certification, a
manufacturer shall pay to the state fire marshal a $250 fee, to be deposited
into a dedicated account in the fire marshal's budget.
Subd. 6. Retesting. If a manufacturer has certified a cigarette
pursuant to this section, and thereafter makes any change to the cigarette that
is likely to alter its compliance with the reduced cigarette ignition
propensity standards required by sections 299F.850 to 299F.858, that cigarette
must not be sold or offered for sale in this state until the manufacturer
retests the cigarette in accordance with the testing standards set forth in
section 299F.851 and maintains records of that retesting as required by section
299F.851. Any altered cigarette that does not meet the performance standard set
forth in section 299F.851 may not be sold in this state.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2600
Sec. 10. [299F.853] MARKING AND CIGARETTE
PACKAGING.
(a) Cigarettes that are
certified by a manufacturer in accordance with section 299F.852 must be marked
to indicate compliance with the requirements of section 299F.851. The marking
must be in eight-point type or larger and consist of:
(1) modification of the
product UPC code to include a visible mark printed at or around the area of the
UPC code, which may consist of alphanumeric or symbolic characters permanently
stamped, engraved, embossed, or printed in conjunction with the UPC;
(2) any visible combination
of alphanumeric or symbolic characters permanently stamped, engraved, or embossed
upon the cigarette package or cellophane wrap; or
(3) printed, stamped,
engraved, or embossed text that indicates that the cigarettes meet the
standards of sections 299F.850 to 299F.858.
(b) A manufacturer shall use
only one marking and shall apply this marking uniformly for all brands marketed
by that manufacturer and all packages, including but not limited to packs,
cartons, and cases.
(c) The state fire marshal
must be notified as to the marking that is selected.
(d) Prior to the
certification of any cigarette, a manufacturer shall present its proposed
marking to the state fire marshal for approval. Upon receipt of the request,
the state fire marshal shall approve or disapprove the marking offered, except
that the state fire marshal shall approve any marking in use and approved for
sale in New York pursuant to the New York "Fire Safety Standards for
Cigarettes." Proposed markings are deemed approved if the state fire
marshal fails to act within ten business days of receiving a request for
approval.
(e) No manufacturer shall
modify its approved marking unless the modification has been approved by the
state fire marshal in accordance with this section.
(f) Manufacturers certifying
cigarettes in accordance with section 299F.852 shall provide a copy of the
certifications to all wholesale dealers and agents to which they sell
cigarettes, and shall also provide sufficient copies of an illustration of the
package marking utilized by the manufacturer pursuant to this section for each
retail dealer to which the wholesale dealers or agents sell cigarettes.
Wholesale dealers and agents shall provide a copy of these package markings
received from manufacturers to all retail dealers to whom they sell cigarettes.
Wholesale dealers, agents, and retail dealers shall permit the state fire
marshal, the commissioner of revenue, the attorney general, and their employees
to inspect markings of cigarette packaging marked in accordance with this
section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Sec. 11. [299F.854] PENALTIES AND REMEDIES.
Subdivision 1. Wholesale. (a) A manufacturer, wholesale dealer, agent,
or any other person or entity who knowingly sells or offers to sell cigarettes,
other than through retail sale, in violation of section 299F.851 is liable to a
civil penalty:
(1) for a first offense, not
to exceed $10,000 per each sale of such cigarettes; and
(2) for a subsequent
offense, not to exceed $25,000 per each sale of such cigarettes.
(b) However, the penalty
against any such person or entity for a violation under paragraph (a) must not
exceed $100,000 during any 30-day period.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2601
Subd. 2. Retail. (a) A retail dealer who knowingly sells
cigarettes in violation of section 299F.851 is liable to a civil penalty:
(1) for a first offense, not
to exceed $500, and for a subsequent offense, not to exceed $2,000, per each
sale or offer for sale of such cigarettes, if the total number sold or offered
for sale does not exceed 1,000 cigarettes; or
(2) for a first offense, not
to exceed $1,000, and for a subsequent offense, not to exceed $5,000, per each
sale or offer for sale of such cigarettes, if the total number sold or offered
for sale exceeds 1,000 cigarettes.
(b) However, the penalty
against any retail dealer must not exceed $25,000 during any 30-day period.
Subd. 3. False certification. In addition to any penalty
prescribed by law, any corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, limited
partnership, or association engaged in the manufacture of cigarettes that
knowingly makes a false certification pursuant to subdivision 3 is, for a first
offense, liable to a civil penalty of at least $75,000, and for a subsequent
offense a civil penalty not to exceed $250,000 for each false certification.
Subd. 4. Violation of other provision. Any person violating any
other provision in sections 299F.850 to 299F.858 is liable to a civil penalty
for a first offense not to exceed $1,000, and for a subsequent offense a civil
penalty not to exceed $5,000, for each violation.
Subd. 5. Forfeiture. Cigarettes that have been sold or offered for
sale that do not comply with the performance standard required by section
299F.851 are subject to forfeiture under section 297F.21 and, upon judgment of
forfeiture, must be destroyed; provided, however, that before destroying any
cigarettes seized in accordance with section 297F.21, which seizure is hereby
authorized, the true holder of the trademark rights in the cigarette brand must
be permitted to inspect the cigarette.
Subd. 6. Remedies. In addition to any other remedy provided by
law, the state fire marshal or attorney general may institute a civil action in
district court for a violation of this section, including petitioning for
injunctive relief or to recover any costs or damages suffered by the state
because of a violation under this section, including enforcement costs relating
to the specific violation and attorney fees. Each violation of sections
299F.850 to 299F.858 or of rules adopted under sections 299F.850 to 299F.858
constitutes a separate civil violation for which the state fire marshal or
attorney general may obtain relief.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Sec. 12. [299F.855] IMPLEMENTATION.
Subdivision 1. Rules. The commissioner of public safety, in consultation
with the state fire marshal, may adopt rules, pursuant to chapter 14, necessary
to effectuate the purposes of sections 299F.850 to 299F.858.
Subd. 2. Commissioner of revenue. The commissioner of revenue in
the regular course of conducting inspections of wholesale dealers, agents, and
retail dealers, as authorized under chapter 297F, may inspect cigarettes to
determine if the cigarettes are marked as required by section 299F.853. If the
cigarettes are not marked as required, the commissioner of revenue shall notify
the state fire marshal.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective
the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final enactment.
Journal of the House - 45th
Day - Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - Top of Page 2602
Sec. 13. [299F.856] INSPECTION.
To enforce sections 299F.850
to 299F.858, the attorney general and the state fire marshal may examine the
books, papers, invoices, and other records of any person in possession,
control, or occupancy of any premises where cigarettes are placed, stored,
sold, or offered for sale, as well as the stock of cigarettes on the premises.
Every person in the possession, control, or occupancy of any premises where
cigarettes are placed, sold, or offered for sale is hereby directed and
required to give the attorney general and the state fire marshal the means,
facilities, and opportunity for the examinations authorized by this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Sec. 14. [299F.858] SALE OUTSIDE OF MINNESOTA.
Sections 299F.850 to 299F.858
do not prohibit any person or entity from manufacturing or selling cigarettes
that do not meet the requirements of section 299F.851 if the cigarettes are or
will be stamped for sale in another state or are packaged for sale outside the
United States and that person or entity has taken reasonable steps to ensure
that such cigarettes will not be sold or offered for sale to persons located in
Minnesota.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is
effective the first day of the 19th month following the date of its final
enactment.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 325E.21, is amended to read:
325E.21 DEALERS IN WIRE AND CABLE SCRAP METAL; RECORDS AND,
REPORTS, AND REGISTRATION.