Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6857

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

 

EIGHTY-FIFTH SESSION - 2007

 

_____________________

 

SEVENTY-SECOND DAY

 

Saint Paul, Minnesota, Friday, May 18, 2007

 

 

The House of Representatives convened at 10:00 a.m. and was called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the House.

 

Prayer was offered by Pastor Jim Arends, Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, LaCrescent, Minnesota.

 

The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

 

The roll was called and the following members were present:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Berns

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dean

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dill

Dominguez

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Emmer

Erhardt

Erickson

Faust

Finstad

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Kranz

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Nornes

Norton

Olin

Olson

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruth

Ruud

Sailer

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Simpson

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sviggum

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Tschumper

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Wardlow

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Wollschlager

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

A quorum was present.

 

Dettmer was excused.

 

Dittrich was excused until 10:45 a.m. Tingelstad was excused until 11:00 a.m. Abeler was excused until 11:25 a.m. Scalze was excused until 11:35 a.m. Howes was excused until 11:40 a.m.

 

The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day. Gardner moved that further reading of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6858

REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK

 

S. F. No. 430 and H. F. No. 1978, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.

 

SUSPENSION OF RULES

 

Murphy, M., moved that the rules be so far suspended that S. F. No. 430 be substituted for H. F. No. 1978 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.

 

 

S. F. No. 886 and H. F. No. 771, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.

 

SUSPENSION OF RULES

 

Mariani moved that the rules be so far suspended that S. F. No. 886 be substituted for H. F. No. 771 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.

 

 

PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS

 

 

The following communications were received:

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

SAINT PAUL 55155

 

May 15, 2007

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

The State of Minnesota

 

Dear Speaker Kelliher:

 

I have vetoed and am returning H. F. No. 946, Chapter No. 84, the Omnibus Transportation Finance Bill.

 

With more than $5 billion in tax and fee increases, this bill would impose an unnecessary and onerous financial burden on Minnesota citizens and would weaken our state's economy. The entire array of tax increases in this bill would cost an average family in Minnesota up to $500 per year.

 

As I clearly stated to the legislative conference committee that crafted this legislation, I remain opposed to increasing the tax burden on Minnesota families. With gasoline prices rising to historic highs, a gas tax increase of up to 7.5 cents per gallon is untimely and misguided.

 

While the media have focused on the gas tax increase, other provisions in this bill need to be highlighted, including:

 

A 0.5% sales tax increase in the seven metro counties and any adjacent county that chooses to join in without a voter referendum. This will result in Minneapolis and Hennepin Counties having one of the higher sales tax rates in the nation.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6859

A 0.5% sales tax increase in Greater Minnesota counties, subject to voter referendum.

 

A new $20 excise tax on motor vehicle purchases.

 

Removal of the requirement that metropolitan counties that impose a wheelage tax ($10) offset that amount on their property tax levy, effectively increasing property taxes.

 

Removal of caps on "license tabs" which limit the tax to $189 in the second year after a car is purchased and $99 in the third year, instituted at the recommendation of Governor Ventura during the 2000 legislative session, subjecting car owners to significant increases.

 

I am disappointed that the conference committee did not adopt my transportation proposal and once again overreached. This type of overreaching has resulted in a transportation funding stalemate at the Capitol for too many years. Steady progress that is achievable is preferable to no progress at all.

 

Along with the numerous tax increases, the following provisions in the bill are also objectionable:

 

I remain opposed to the provision creating a new joint powers entity in the metropolitan area with powers to distribute transportation funds to counties, cities, and the state. The proposed governing board would create a duplicative and unnecessarily complicated structure and add unnecessary process at the local, state and federal levels. Separating transportation spending decisions from the regional transportation planning function - as H. F. No. 946 would do - would be a step backward (recall the Regional Transit Board). This provision is bad public policy and would likely feature parochial decision making over an objective, regional perspective for transportation and transit planning, capital investments, and operations.

 

I also remain opposed to the provision that severely restricts the extent to which a county regional rail authority may participate in financing the construction and operation of a transit project. This provision will have a negative impact on Minnesota's ability to compete for federal capital transit funding for future "new starts" projects, and it could also have an immediate negative - or even fatal - impact on the Northstar commuter rail project. This provision would necessitate a restructuring of the Northstar capital financing plan that has been submitted to the Federal Transit Administration. The restructuring effort could delay the project, putting in question the project's ability to remain eligible for federal funding.

 

The bill includes many items on which we share some agreement, such as a significant level of trunk highway bonding to accelerate long-delayed priority highway projects, the distribution of constitutionally dedicated motor vehicle sales taxes (MVST) with a ratio of 60 percent for roads and highways and 40 percent for transit, and the dedication of sales tax revenues on leased vehicles to highways and transit. However, I strongly urge the Legislature to adhere to my earlier proposal to include leased vehicle sales tax revenue in the base of the constitutionally dedicated MVST fund, and distribute the overall transit portion 38 percent for Metro area transit and 2 percent for Greater Minnesota transit. This formula will ensure that transit systems across the state will have additional funds to meet their future operating obligations.

 

I am issuing my veto promptly because I believe there is still time this session for the Legislature to pass a significant transportation financing bill - without tax increases - that I can sign into law. Investing in transportation is important to the citizens of Minnesota and a top priority of my administration. I urge the Legislature to approve my administration's transportation financing proposal and help us move forward in addressing Minnesota's transportation needs.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Tim Pawlenty

Governor


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6860

MOTION TO OVERRIDE VETO

 

Olson moved that H. F. No. 946, Chapter No. 84, be now reconsidered and repassed, the objections of the Governor notwithstanding, pursuant to Article IV, Section 23, of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota.

 

 

LAY ON THE TABLE

 

Sertich moved that the Olson motion be laid on the table.

 

 

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

The question was taken on the Sertich motion and the roll was called. There were 84 yeas and 39 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anzelc

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dill

Dominguez

Doty

Eken

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Johnson

Juhnke

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kranz

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Norton

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Tschumper

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Wollschlager

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Berns

Brod

Buesgens

Dean

DeLaForest

Demmer

Eastlund

Emmer

Erickson

Finstad

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Heidgerken

Holberg

Hoppe

Jaros

Kohls

Lanning

Magnus

McNamara

Nornes

Olson

Paulsen

Peppin

Ruth

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Simpson

Smith

Sviggum

Wardlow

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

The motion prevailed and the Olson motion was laid on the table.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6861

STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

SAINT PAUL 55155

 

May 15, 2007

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

The State of Minnesota

 

Dear Speaker Kelliher:

 

I have vetoed and am returning House File No. 2294, Chapter No. 81, relating to property taxes and individual income tax increases.

 

Although I am supportive of providing property tax relief, it should be funded within the 9.8 percent biennial budget growth and the current surplus of $2.2 billion and not by increasing income taxes by $452 million.

 

The creation of a new 4th tier for individual income taxes at a 9 percent rate would place Minnesota with the third highest tax rate in the nation. This tax would fall most heavily on the job creators and employers in the state as 90 percent of businesses are flow-through entities that pay their taxes through the individual income tax system. A permanent statewide tax increase of this magnitude would place Minnesota at a competitive disadvantage, negatively impacting our economy and the job creators in our state.

 

This bill also makes significant changes to the state equalization aid formula for excess levy referenda. Current law defines a specific process for calculating a school district's state equalization aid. This bill replaces the current fixed standard to a new standard based on a percentage of "market value equalization factor." The "market value equalization factor" is a new term that is not defined under current law or in this bill. If this provision became the law, the state would not be able to calculate the equalization aid to otherwise qualifying school districts. This would potentially harm qualifying school districts with less property tax wealth - these tend to be school districts in rural areas or those in outer ring suburbs.

 

I encourage the Legislature to pass targeted homeowner property tax relief that is sustainable and is part of the overall budget target agreement. We look forward to working with you in this final week of session to reach a compromise that is acceptable to all on the remaining omnibus tax and funding bills.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Tim Pawlenty

Governor

 

 

MOTION TO OVERRIDE VETO

 

Olson moved that H. F. No. 2294, Chapter No. 81, be now reconsidered and repassed, the objections of the Governor notwithstanding, pursuant to Article IV, Section 23, of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota.

 

 

LAY ON THE TABLE

 

Sertich moved that the Olson motion be laid on the table.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6862

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

The question was taken on the Sertich motion and the roll was called. There were 93 yeas and 36 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dean

Dill

Dittrich

Dominguez

Doty

Eken

Erhardt

Faust

Finstad

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kranz

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Norton

Olin

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Tschumper

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Wollschlager

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Berns

Brod

Buesgens

DeLaForest

Demmer

Eastlund

Emmer

Erickson

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Heidgerken

Holberg

Hoppe

Kohls

Lanning

Magnus

Nornes

Olson

Peppin

Ruth

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Simpson

Smith

Sviggum

Urdahl

Wardlow

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

The motion prevailed and the Olson motion was laid on the table.

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

ST. PAUL 55155

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

I have the honor to inform you that the following enrolled Act of the 2007 Session of the State Legislature has been received from the Office of the Governor and is deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution, Article IV, Section 23:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6863

S. F.

No.

 

H. F.

No.

 

Session Laws

Chapter No.

Time and

Date Approved

2007

 

Date Filed

2007

 

238 82 11:01 a.m. May 16 May 16

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Mark Ritchie

Secretary of State

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

ST. PAUL 55155

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

I have the honor to inform you that the following enrolled Acts of the 2007 Session of the State Legislature have been received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution, Article IV, Section 23:

 

 

S. F.

No.

 

H. F.

No.

 

Session Laws

Chapter No.

Time and

Date Approved

2007

 

Date Filed

2007

 

538 77 3:30 p.m. May 17 May 17

1045 78 3:32 p.m. May 17 May 17

608 79 3:34 p.m. May 17 May 17

1542 80 3:35 p.m. May 17 May 17

1755 83 3:36 p.m. May 17 May 17

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Mark Ritchie

Secretary of State

 

 

SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS

 

 

S. F. Nos. 430 and 886 were read for the second time.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6864

INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

 

The following House Files were introduced:

 

 

Jaros introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2503, A bill for an act relating to natural resources; providing for lake and river name changes.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources.

 

 

Madore, Ozment, Garofalo, Hansen, Masin and Atkins introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2504, A bill for an act relating to capital improvements; appropriating money for asset preservation at the Minnesota Zoological Garden; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Haws, Doty, Hosch and Abeler introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2505, A bill for an act relating to transportation; authorizing the sale of state bonds; appropriating money for final design of extension of commuter rail service.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Seifert introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2506, A bill for an act relating to transportation finance; appropriating money for transportation, Metropolitan Council, and public safety activities; providing for fund transfers, general contingent accounts, and tort claims; authorizing sale and issuance of trunk highway bonds for highways and transit facilities; modifying provisions related to driver and vehicle services fees; modifying provisions relating to various transportation-related funds and accounts; providing sales tax exemption for commuter rail system; providing for treatment and deposit of proceeds of lease and sales taxes on motor vehicles; modifying formula for transit assistance to transit replacement service communities; increasing fees for services of Department of Public Safety; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 16A.88; 161.04, subdivision 3; 168.017, subdivision 3; 168.12, subdivision 5; 168A.29, subdivision 1; 171.02, subdivision 3; 171.06, subdivision 2; 171.07, subdivisions 3a, 11; 171.20, subdivision 4; 297A.70, subdivision 2; 297A.71, by adding a subdivision; 297A.815, by adding a subdivision; 297A.94; 297B.09, subdivision 1; 299D.09; 473.388, subdivision 4; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 174.32.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Knuth and Hausman introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2507, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing spending to acquire and better public land and buildings and other improvements of a capital nature; authorizing the issuance of state bonds; appropriating money for highway interchange improvements in Arden Hills.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6865

Knuth and Hausman introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2508, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing spending to acquire and better public land and buildings and other improvements of a capital nature; appropriating money for highway interchange improvements in Arden Hills.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Cornish, Smith, Lesch, Berns and Zellers introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2509, A bill for an act relating to crimes; prohibiting attempting to disarm peace officers when the officer is engaged in the performance of duties; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Public Safety and Civil Justice.

 

 

Abeler and Otremba introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2510, A bill for an act relating to health; prohibiting pharmacists from substituting epilepsy drugs without consent; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 151.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services.

 

 

Koenen introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2511, A bill for an act relating to capital improvements; appropriating money for a walking path in Clara City; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Gottwalt introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2512, A bill for an act relating to taxation; sales and use; exempting construction materials and equipment used to construct public safety facilities in the city of St. Cloud; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 297A.71, by adding a subdivision.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.

 

 

Mariani; Garofalo; Erhardt; Cornish; Solberg; Ruth; Demmer; Tingelstad; Abeler; Davnie; Eken; Johnson; Poppe; Kahn; Lesch; Simon; Carlson; Lieder; Hausman; Walker; Hortman; Lillie; Howes; Peppin; Hoppe; Mullery; Wagenius; Murphy, E.; Urdahl; Peterson, N.; Marquart; Otremba; Simpson; Greiling and Nelson introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2513, A bill for an act relating to state government; providing that the Compensation Council establishes salaries for legislators, judges, and constitutional officers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 15A.082.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6866

Rukavina and Anzelc introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2514, A bill for an act relating to retirement; amending deferred compensation plan restrictions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 356.24, subdivision 1.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations, Reform, Technology and Elections.

 

 

Abeler and Benson introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2515, A bill for an act relating to education; requiring a nutrient analysis of school menus; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 124D.111, subdivision 2.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on E-12 Education.

 

 

Lanning, Kranz, Nornes, Hortman, Simpson, Olin and Demmer introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2516, A bill for an act relating to capital improvements; authorizing the issuance of state bonds; appropriating money to construct the Northwestern Minnesota Regional Sports Center in Moorhead.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Murphy, M.; Huntley and Jaros introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2517, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing spending to acquire and better public land and buildings and other improvements of a capital nature; authorizing the issuance of state bonds; appropriating money for new terminal facilities at the Duluth airport.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Huntley; Murphy, M., and Jaros introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2518, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing spending to acquire and better public land and buildings and other improvements of a capital nature; authorizing the issuance of state bonds; appropriating money for construction of sanitary sewer overflow facilities in Duluth.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Doty introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2519, A bill for an act relating to capital improvements; appropriating money for a wastewater collection system in the township and city of Garrison and Kathio Township; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6867

Jaros; Murphy, M., and Huntley introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2520, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing spending to acquire and better public land and buildings and other improvements of a capital nature; authorizing the issuance of state bonds; appropriating money for expansion of the polar bear exhibit at the Lake Superior Zoo in Duluth.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

Doty introduced:

 

H. F. No. 2521, A bill for an act relating to highways; appropriating money to reconstruct highway 25 through city of Pierz; authorizing sale of trunk highway bonds.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

 

The following messages were received from the Senate:

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

S. F. No. 493.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.

 

Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. No. 493

 

A bill for an act relating to public nuisances; providing that certain criminal gang behavior is a public nuisance; authorizing injunctive relief and other remedies; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 617.

 

May 15, 2007

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 493 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

 

That the House recede from its amendment and that S. F. No. 493 be further amended as follows:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6868

Page 1, line 10, delete "five" and insert "three"

 

Page 1, line 16, delete everything after "means" and insert a colon

 

Page 1, after line 16, insert:

 

"(1) a structure suitable for human shelter, a commercial"

 

Page 1, line 24, delete the period and insert "; or"

 

Page 1, after line 24, insert:

 

"(2) a parcel of land that does not include a structure and is under the control of the person who owns or is responsible for maintaining the land."

 

Page 2, delete section 3 and insert:

 

"Sec. 3. [617.93] SUIT TO ABATE NUISANCE.

 

(a) A county or city attorney or the attorney general may sue to enjoin a public nuisance under sections 617.91 to 617.97.

 

(b) A person who continuously or regularly engages in gang activity as a member of a criminal gang may be made a defendant in a suit.

 

(c) If the public nuisance involves the use of a place as provided in section 617.92, subdivision 2, the owner or a person who is responsible for maintaining the place on behalf of the owner may be made a defendant in the suit pursuant to the procedures applicable to owners under sections 617.81 to 617.87."

 

Page 3, line 8, delete everything after "activity" and insert ". The court in imposing reasonable requirements must balance state interests in public safety against constitutional freedoms."

 

Page 3, line 32, delete "provides credible evidence" and insert "proves, by a preponderance of the evidence,"

 

 

We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.

 

Senate Conferees: Mee Moua, Don Betzold and Warren Limmer.

 

House Conferees: John Lesch, Joe Mullery and Tony Cornish.

 

 

Lesch moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 493 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.

 

 

S. F. No. 493, A bill for an act relating to public nuisances; providing that certain criminal gang behavior is a public nuisance; authorizing injunctive relief and other remedies; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 617.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6869

The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 114 yeas and 15 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Berns

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Demmer

Dill

Dittrich

Dominguez

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Erhardt

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Jaros

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Kranz

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Norton

Olin

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruth

Ruud

Sailer

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Simpson

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sviggum

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Tschumper

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Wardlow

Welti

Winkler

Wollschlager

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Brod

Buesgens

Dean

DeLaForest

Emmer

Erickson

Finstad

Holberg

Hoppe

Huntley

Nornes

Olson

Seifert

Westrom


 

 

The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

S. F. No. 1724.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.

 

Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. No. 1724

 

A bill for an act relating to human services; making changes to licensing provisions; modifying data practices, program administration, disaster plans, education programs, conditional license provisions, suspensions, sanctions, and contested case hearings, child care center training, family child care training requirements, vulnerable adults, maltreatment of minors, background studies, disqualifications, reconsiderations, disqualification set-asides, fair


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6870

hearings, appeals, changing definitions of neglect and physical abuse; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, subdivisions 2, 4; 245A.03, subdivision 2; 245A.04, subdivision 11, by adding subdivisions; 245A.06, subdivision 4; 245A.07, subdivisions 2a, 3, by adding a subdivision; 245A.08, subdivision 2a; 245A.10, subdivision 2; 245A.14, subdivision 8; 245A.144; 245A.1445; 245A.145, subdivision 1; 245A.18, subdivision 2; 245A.65, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 245C.02, by adding a subdivision; 245C.05, subdivision 3; 245C.07; 245C.08; 245C.09, subdivision 1; 245C.11, by adding a subdivision; 245C.13, subdivision 2; 245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 245C.16, subdivision 1; 245C.17, subdivisions 2, 3; 245C.21, subdivisions 2, 3; 245C.22, subdivisions 4, 5; 245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 245C.28, subdivision 1; 245C.301; 256B.0919, by adding a subdivision; 256B.092, by adding a subdivision; 270B.14, subdivision 1; 626.556, subdivisions 2, 10e, 10i; 626.557, subdivisions 9c, 9d; 626.5572, subdivision 17; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 245A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 245A.023; 245A.14, subdivisions 7, 9, 9a, 12, 13; 245C.06; Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0385; 9503.0035.

 

May 16, 2007

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 1724 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

 

That the Senate concur in the House amendments and that S. F. No. 1724 be further amended as follows:

 

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

 

"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 13.46, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. General. (a) Unless the data is summary data or a statute specifically provides a different classification, data on individuals collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by the welfare system is private data on individuals, and shall not be disclosed except:

 

(1) according to section 13.05;

 

(2) according to court order;

 

(3) according to a statute specifically authorizing access to the private data;

 

(4) to an agent of the welfare system, including a law enforcement person, attorney, or investigator acting for it in the investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil proceeding relating to the administration of a program;

 

(5) to personnel of the welfare system who require the data to verify an individual's identity; determine eligibility, amount of assistance, and the need to provide services to an individual or family across programs; evaluate the effectiveness of programs; assess parental contribution amounts; and investigate suspected fraud;

 

(6) to administer federal funds or programs;

 

(7) between personnel of the welfare system working in the same program;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6871

(8) to the Department of Revenue to assess parental contribution amounts for purposes of section 252.27, subdivision 2a, administer and evaluate tax refund or tax credit programs and to identify individuals who may benefit from these programs. The following information may be disclosed under this paragraph: an individual's and their dependent's names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, income, addresses, and other data as required, upon request by the Department of Revenue. Disclosures by the commissioner of revenue to the commissioner of human services for the purposes described in this clause are governed by section 270B.14, subdivision 1. Tax refund or tax credit programs include, but are not limited to, the dependent care credit under section 290.067, the Minnesota working family credit under section 290.0671, the property tax refund and rental credit under section 290A.04, and the Minnesota education credit under section 290.0674;

 

(9) between the Department of Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Department of Employment and Economic Development for the purpose of monitoring, and when applicable, the Department of Education, for the following purposes:

 

(i) to monitor the eligibility of the data subject for unemployment benefits, for any employment or training program administered, supervised, or certified by that agency, for the purpose of administering;

 

(ii) to administer any rehabilitation program or child care assistance program, whether alone or in conjunction with the welfare system, or;

 

(iii) to monitor and evaluate the Minnesota family investment program by exchanging data on recipients and former recipients of food support, cash assistance under chapter 256, 256D, 256J, or 256K, child care assistance under chapter 119B, or medical programs under chapter 256B, 256D, or 256L; and

 

(iv) to analyze public assistance employment services and program utilization, cost, effectiveness, and outcomes as implemented under the authority established in Title II, Sections 201-204 of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999. Health records governed by section 144.335 and "protected health information" as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section 160.103, and governed by Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, parts 160-164, including health care claims utilization information, must not be exchanged under this clause;

 

(10) to appropriate parties in connection with an emergency if knowledge of the information is necessary to protect the health or safety of the individual or other individuals or persons;

 

(11) data maintained by residential programs as defined in section 245A.02 may be disclosed to the protection and advocacy system established in this state according to Part C of Public Law 98-527 to protect the legal and human rights of persons with developmental disabilities or other related conditions who live in residential facilities for these persons if the protection and advocacy system receives a complaint by or on behalf of that person and the person does not have a legal guardian or the state or a designee of the state is the legal guardian of the person;

 

(12) to the county medical examiner or the county coroner for identifying or locating relatives or friends of a deceased person;

 

(13) data on a child support obligor who makes payments to the public agency may be disclosed to the Minnesota Office of Higher Education to the extent necessary to determine eligibility under section 136A.121, subdivision 2, clause (5);

 

(14) participant Social Security numbers and names collected by the telephone assistance program may be disclosed to the Department of Revenue to conduct an electronic data match with the property tax refund database to determine eligibility under section 237.70, subdivision 4a;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6872

(15) the current address of a Minnesota family investment program participant may be disclosed to law enforcement officers who provide the name of the participant and notify the agency that:

 

(i) the participant:

 

(A) is a fugitive felon fleeing to avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement after conviction, for a crime or attempt to commit a crime that is a felony under the laws of the jurisdiction from which the individual is fleeing; or

 

(B) is violating a condition of probation or parole imposed under state or federal law;

 

(ii) the location or apprehension of the felon is within the law enforcement officer's official duties; and

 

(iii) the request is made in writing and in the proper exercise of those duties;

 

(16) the current address of a recipient of general assistance or general assistance medical care may be disclosed to probation officers and corrections agents who are supervising the recipient and to law enforcement officers who are investigating the recipient in connection with a felony level offense;

 

(17) information obtained from food support applicant or recipient households may be disclosed to local, state, or federal law enforcement officials, upon their written request, for the purpose of investigating an alleged violation of the Food Stamp Act, according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 7, section 272.1(c);

 

(18) the address, Social Security number, and, if available, photograph of any member of a household receiving food support shall be made available, on request, to a local, state, or federal law enforcement officer if the officer furnishes the agency with the name of the member and notifies the agency that:

 

(i) the member:

 

(A) is fleeing to avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement after conviction, for a crime or attempt to commit a crime that is a felony in the jurisdiction the member is fleeing;

 

(B) is violating a condition of probation or parole imposed under state or federal law; or

 

(C) has information that is necessary for the officer to conduct an official duty related to conduct described in subitem (A) or (B);

 

(ii) locating or apprehending the member is within the officer's official duties; and

 

(iii) the request is made in writing and in the proper exercise of the officer's official duty;

 

(19) the current address of a recipient of Minnesota family investment program, general assistance, general assistance medical care, or food support may be disclosed to law enforcement officers who, in writing, provide the name of the recipient and notify the agency that the recipient is a person required to register under section 243.166, but is not residing at the address at which the recipient is registered under section 243.166;

 

(20) certain information regarding child support obligors who are in arrears may be made public according to section 518A.74;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6873

(21) data on child support payments made by a child support obligor and data on the distribution of those payments excluding identifying information on obligees may be disclosed to all obligees to whom the obligor owes support, and data on the enforcement actions undertaken by the public authority, the status of those actions, and data on the income of the obligor or obligee may be disclosed to the other party;

 

(22) data in the work reporting system may be disclosed under section 256.998, subdivision 7;

 

(23) to the Department of Education for the purpose of matching Department of Education student data with public assistance data to determine students eligible for free and reduced price meals, meal supplements, and free milk according to United States Code, title 42, sections 1758, 1761, 1766, 1766a, 1772, and 1773; to allocate federal and state funds that are distributed based on income of the student's family; and to verify receipt of energy assistance for the telephone assistance plan;

 

(24) the current address and telephone number of program recipients and emergency contacts may be released to the commissioner of health or a local board of health as defined in section 145A.02, subdivision 2, when the commissioner or local board of health has reason to believe that a program recipient is a disease case, carrier, suspect case, or at risk of illness, and the data are necessary to locate the person;

 

(25) to other state agencies, statewide systems, and political subdivisions of this state, including the attorney general, and agencies of other states, interstate information networks, federal agencies, and other entities as required by federal regulation or law for the administration of the child support enforcement program;

 

(26) to personnel of public assistance programs as defined in section 256.741, for access to the child support system database for the purpose of administration, including monitoring and evaluation of those public assistance programs;

 

(27) to monitor and evaluate the Minnesota family investment program by exchanging data between the Departments of Human Services and Education, on recipients and former recipients of food support, cash assistance under chapter 256, 256D, 256J, or 256K, child care assistance under chapter 119B, or medical programs under chapter 256B, 256D, or 256L;

 

(28) to evaluate child support program performance and to identify and prevent fraud in the child support program by exchanging data between the Department of Human Services, Department of Revenue under section 270B.14, subdivision 1, paragraphs (a) and (b), without regard to the limitation of use in paragraph (c), Department of Health, Department of Employment and Economic Development, and other state agencies as is reasonably necessary to perform these functions; or

 

(29) counties operating child care assistance programs under chapter 119B may disseminate data on program participants, applicants, and providers to the commissioner of education.

 

(b) Information on persons who have been treated for drug or alcohol abuse may only be disclosed according to the requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.1 to 2.67.

 

(c) Data provided to law enforcement agencies under paragraph (a), clause (15), (16), (17), or (18), or paragraph (b), are investigative data and are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. The data are private after the investigation becomes inactive under section 13.82, subdivision 5, paragraph (a) or (b).

 

(d) Mental health data shall be treated as provided in subdivisions 7, 8, and 9, but is not subject to the access provisions of subdivision 10, paragraph (b).

 

For the purposes of this subdivision, a request will be deemed to be made in writing if made through a computer interface system.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6874

Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 13.46, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. Licensing data. (a) As used in this subdivision:

 

(1) "licensing data" means all data collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by the welfare system pertaining to persons licensed or registered or who apply for licensure or registration or who formerly were licensed or registered under the authority of the commissioner of human services;

 

(2) "client" means a person who is receiving services from a licensee or from an applicant for licensure; and

 

(3) "personal and personal financial data" means Social Security numbers, identity of and letters of reference, insurance information, reports from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, health examination reports, and social/home studies.

 

(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c), the following data on current applicants, license holders, and former licensees are public: name, address, telephone number of licensees, date of receipt of a completed application, dates of licensure, licensed capacity, type of client preferred, variances granted, record of training and education in child care and child development, type of dwelling, name and relationship of other family members, previous license history, class of license, the existence and status of complaints, and the number of serious injuries to or deaths of individuals in the licensed program as reported to the commissioner of human services, the local social services agency, or any other county welfare agency. For purposes of this clause, a serious injury is one that is treated by a physician. When a correction order or fine has been issued, a license is suspended, immediately suspended, revoked, denied, or made conditional, or a complaint is resolved, the following data on current and former licensees and applicants are public: the substance and investigative findings of the licensing or maltreatment complaint, licensing violation, or substantiated maltreatment; the record of informal resolution of a licensing violation; orders of hearing; findings of fact; conclusions of law; specifications of the final correction order, fine, suspension, immediate suspension, revocation, denial, or conditional license contained in the record of licensing action; and the status of any appeal of these actions.

 

(2) Notwithstanding sections 626.556, subdivision 11, and 626.557, subdivision 12b, when any person subject to disqualification under section 245C.14 in connection with a license to provide family day care for children, child care center services, foster care for children in the provider's home, or foster care or day care services for adults in the provider's home is a substantiated perpetrator of maltreatment, and the substantiated maltreatment is a reason for a licensing action, the identity of the substantiated perpetrator of maltreatment is public data. For purposes of this clause, a person is a substantiated perpetrator if the maltreatment determination has been upheld under section 256.045; 626.556, subdivision 10i; 626.557, subdivision 9d; or chapter 14, or if an individual or facility has not timely exercised appeal rights under these sections.

 

(3) For applicants who withdraw their application prior to licensure or denial of a license, the following data are public: the name of the applicant, the city and county in which the applicant was seeking licensure, the dates of the commissioner's receipt of the initial application and completed application, the type of license sought, and the date of withdrawal of the application.

 

(4) For applicants who are denied a license, the following data are public: the name and address of the applicant, the city and county in which the applicant was seeking licensure, the dates of the commissioner's receipt of the initial application and completed application, the type of license sought, the date of denial of the application, the nature of the basis for the denial, the record of informal resolution of a denial, orders of hearings, findings of fact, conclusions of law, specifications of the final order of denial, and the status of any appeal of the denial.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6875

(5) The following data on persons subject to disqualification under section 245C.14 in connection with a license to provide family day care for children, child care center services, foster care for children in the provider's home, or foster care or day care services for adults in the provider's home, are public: the nature of any disqualification set aside under section 245C.22, subdivisions 2 and 4, and the reasons for setting aside the disqualification; the nature of any disqualification for which a variance was granted under sections 245A.04, subdivision 9; and 245C.30, and the reasons for granting any variance under section 245A.04, subdivision 9; and, if applicable, the disclosure that any person subject to a background study under section 245C.03, subdivision 1, has successfully passed a background study.

 

(6) When maltreatment is substantiated under section 626.556 or 626.557 and the victim and the substantiated perpetrator are affiliated with a program licensed under chapter 245A, the commissioner of human services, local social services agency, or county welfare agency may inform the license holder where the maltreatment occurred of the identity of the substantiated perpetrator and the victim.

 

(7) Notwithstanding clause (1), for child foster care, only the name of the license holder and the status of the license are public if the county attorney has requested that data otherwise classified as public data under clause (1) be considered private data based on the best interests of a child in placement in a licensed program.

 

(c) The following are private data on individuals under section 13.02, subdivision 12, or nonpublic data under section 13.02, subdivision 9: personal and personal financial data on family day care program and family foster care program applicants and licensees and their family members who provide services under the license.

 

(d) The following are private data on individuals: the identity of persons who have made reports concerning licensees or applicants that appear in inactive investigative data, and the records of clients or employees of the licensee or applicant for licensure whose records are received by the licensing agency for purposes of review or in anticipation of a contested matter. The names of reporters under sections 626.556 and 626.557 may be disclosed only as provided in section 626.556, subdivision 11, or 626.557, subdivision 12b.

 

(e) Data classified as private, confidential, nonpublic, or protected nonpublic under this subdivision become public data if submitted to a court or administrative law judge as part of a disciplinary proceeding in which there is a public hearing concerning a license which has been suspended, immediately suspended, revoked, or denied.

 

(f) Data generated in the course of licensing investigations that relate to an alleged violation of law are investigative data under subdivision 3.

 

(g) Data that are not public data collected, maintained, used, or disseminated under this subdivision that relate to or are derived from a report as defined in section 626.556, subdivision 2, or 626.5572, subdivision 18, are subject to the destruction provisions of sections 626.556, subdivision 11c, and 626.557, subdivision 12b.

 

(h) Upon request, not public data collected, maintained, used, or disseminated under this subdivision that relate to or are derived from a report of substantiated maltreatment as defined in section 626.556 or 626.557 may be exchanged with the Department of Health for purposes of completing background studies pursuant to section 144.057 and with the Department of Corrections for purposes of completing background studies pursuant to section 241.021.

 

(i) Data on individuals collected according to licensing activities under chapters 245A and 245C, and data on individuals collected by the commissioner of human services according to maltreatment investigations under sections 626.556 and 626.557, may be shared with the Department of Human Rights, the Department of Health, the Department of Corrections, the Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, and the individual's professional regulatory board when there is reason to believe that laws or standards under the jurisdiction of those agencies may have been violated.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6876

(j) In addition to the notice of determinations required under section 626.556, subdivision 10f, if the commissioner or the local social services agency has determined that an individual is a substantiated perpetrator of maltreatment of a child based on sexual abuse, as defined in section 626.556, subdivision 2, and the commissioner or local social services agency knows that the individual is a person responsible for a child's care in another facility, the commissioner or local social services agency shall notify the head of that facility of this determination. The notification must include an explanation of the individual's available appeal rights and the status of any appeal. If a notice is given under this paragraph, the government entity making the notification shall provide a copy of the notice to the individual who is the subject of the notice.

 

(k) All not public data collected, maintained, used, or disseminated under this subdivision and subdivision 3 may be exchanged between the Department of Human Services, Licensing Division, and the Department of Corrections for purposes of regulating services for which the Department of Human Services and the Department of Corrections have regulatory authority.

 

Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.03, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Exclusion from licensure. (a) This chapter does not apply to:

 

(1) residential or nonresidential programs that are provided to a person by an individual who is related unless the residential program is a child foster care placement made by a local social services agency or a licensed child-placing agency, except as provided in subdivision 2a;

 

(2) nonresidential programs that are provided by an unrelated individual to persons from a single related family;

 

(3) residential or nonresidential programs that are provided to adults who do not abuse chemicals or who do not have a chemical dependency, a mental illness, a developmental disability, a functional impairment, or a physical disability;

 

(4) sheltered workshops or work activity programs that are certified by the commissioner of economic security;

 

(5) programs operated by a public school for children 33 months or older;

 

(6) nonresidential programs primarily for children that provide care or supervision for periods of less than three hours a day while the child's parent or legal guardian is in the same building as the nonresidential program or present within another building that is directly contiguous to the building in which the nonresidential program is located;

 

(7) nursing homes or hospitals licensed by the commissioner of health except as specified under section 245A.02;

 

(8) board and lodge facilities licensed by the commissioner of health that provide services for five or more persons whose primary diagnosis is mental illness that do not provide intensive residential treatment;

 

(9) homes providing programs for persons placed there by a county or a licensed agency for legal adoption, unless the adoption is not completed within two years;

 

(10) programs licensed by the commissioner of corrections;

 

(11) recreation programs for children or adults that are operated or approved by a park and recreation board whose primary purpose is to provide social and recreational activities;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6877

(12) programs operated by a school as defined in section 120A.22, subdivision 4, whose primary purpose is to provide child care to school-age children;

 

(13) Head Start nonresidential programs which operate for less than 45 days in each calendar year;

 

(14) noncertified boarding care homes unless they provide services for five or more persons whose primary diagnosis is mental illness or a developmental disability;

 

(15) programs for children such as scouting, boys clubs, girls clubs, and sports and art programs, and nonresidential programs for children provided for a cumulative total of less than 30 days in any 12-month period;

 

(16) residential programs for persons with mental illness, that are located in hospitals;

 

(17) the religious instruction of school-age children; Sabbath or Sunday schools; or the congregate care of children by a church, congregation, or religious society during the period used by the church, congregation, or religious society for its regular worship;

 

(18) camps licensed by the commissioner of health under Minnesota Rules, chapter 4630;

 

(19) mental health outpatient services for adults with mental illness or children with emotional disturbance;

 

(20) residential programs serving school-age children whose sole purpose is cultural or educational exchange, until the commissioner adopts appropriate rules;

 

(21) unrelated individuals who provide out-of-home respite care services to persons with developmental disabilities from a single related family for no more than 90 days in a 12-month period and the respite care services are for the temporary relief of the person's family or legal representative;

 

(22) respite care services provided as a home and community-based service to a person with a developmental disability, in the person's primary residence;

 

(23) community support services programs as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 6, and family community support services as defined in section 245.4871, subdivision 17;

 

(24) the placement of a child by a birth parent or legal guardian in a preadoptive home for purposes of adoption as authorized by section 259.47;

 

(25) settings registered under chapter 144D which provide home care services licensed by the commissioner of health to fewer than seven adults; or

 

(26) consumer-directed community support service funded under the Medicaid waiver for persons with developmental disabilities when the individual who provided the service is:

 

(i) the same individual who is the direct payee of these specific waiver funds or paid by a fiscal agent, fiscal intermediary, or employer of record; and

 

(ii) not otherwise under the control of a residential or nonresidential program that is required to be licensed under this chapter when providing the service.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6878

(b) For purposes of paragraph (a), clause (6), a building is directly contiguous to a building in which a nonresidential program is located if it shares a common wall with the building in which the nonresidential program is located or is attached to that building by skyway, tunnel, atrium, or common roof.

 

(c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require licensure for any services provided and funded according to an approved federal waiver plan where licensure is specifically identified as not being a condition for the services and funding.

 

Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.04, subdivision 11, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 11. Education program; additional requirement. (a) The education program offered in a residential or nonresidential program, except for child care, foster care, or services for adults, must be approved by the commissioner of education before the commissioner of human services may grant a license to the program.

 

(b) A residential program licensed by the commissioner of human services under Minnesota Rules, parts 9545.0905 to 9545.1125 or 9545.1400 to 9545.1480 2960.0010 to 2960.0710, may serve persons through the age of 19 when:

 

(1) the admission or continued stay is necessary for a person to complete a secondary school program or its equivalent, or it is necessary to facilitate a transition period after completing the secondary school program or its equivalent for up to four months in order for the resident to obtain other living arrangements;

 

(2) the facility develops policies, procedures, and plans required under section 245A.65;

 

(3) the facility documents an assessment of the 18- or 19-year-old person's risk of victimizing children residing in the facility, and develops necessary risk reduction measures, including sleeping arrangements, to minimize any risk of harm to children; and

 

(4) notwithstanding the license holder's target population age range, whenever persons age 18 or 19 years old are receiving residential services, the age difference among residents may not exceed five years.

 

(c) Nothing in this paragraph precludes the license holder from seeking other variances under subdivision 9.

 

Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.04, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 14. Policies and procedures for program administration required and enforceable. (a) The license holder shall develop program policies and procedures necessary to maintain compliance with licensing requirements under Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota Rules.

 

(b) The license holder shall:

 

(1) provide training to program staff related to their duties in implementing the program's policies and procedures developed under paragraph (a);

 

(2) document the provision of this training; and

 

(3) monitor implementation of policies and procedures by program staff.

 

(c) The license holder shall keep program policies and procedures readily accessible to staff and index the policies and procedures with a table of contents or another method approved by the commissioner.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6879

Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.04, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 15. Pandemic planning. Upon request, the license holder must cooperate with state and local government disaster planning agencies working to prepare for or react to emergencies presented by a pandemic outbreak.

 

Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.06, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. Notice of conditional license; reconsideration of conditional license. If a license is made conditional, the license holder must be notified of the order by certified mail or personal service. If mailed, the notice must be mailed to the address shown on the application or the last known address of the license holder. The notice must state the reasons the conditional license was ordered and must inform the license holder of the right to request reconsideration of the conditional license by the commissioner. The license holder may request reconsideration of the order of conditional license by notifying the commissioner by certified mail or personal service. The request must be made in writing. If sent by certified mail, the request must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within ten calendar days after the license holder received the order. If a request is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within ten calendar days after the license holder received the order. The license holder may submit with the request for reconsideration written argument or evidence in support of the request for reconsideration. A timely request for reconsideration shall stay imposition of the terms of the conditional license until the commissioner issues a decision on the request for reconsideration. If the commissioner issues a dual order of conditional license under this section and an order to pay a fine under section 245A.07, subdivision 3, the license holder has a right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. The scope of the contested case hearing shall include the fine and the conditional license. In this case, a reconsideration of the conditional license will not be conducted under this section. If the license holder does not appeal the fine, the license holder does not have a right to a contested case hearing and a reconsideration of the conditional license must be conducted under this subdivision.

 

The commissioner's disposition of a request for reconsideration is final and not subject to appeal under chapter 14.

 

Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.07, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2a. Immediate suspension expedited hearing. (a) Within five working days of receipt of the license holder's timely appeal, the commissioner shall request assignment of an administrative law judge. The request must include a proposed date, time, and place of a hearing. A hearing must be conducted by an administrative law judge within 30 calendar days of the request for assignment, unless an extension is requested by either party and granted by the administrative law judge for good cause. The commissioner shall issue a notice of hearing by certified mail or personal service at least ten working days before the hearing. The scope of the hearing shall be limited solely to the issue of whether the temporary immediate suspension should remain in effect pending the commissioner's final order under section 245A.08, regarding a licensing sanction issued under subdivision 3 following the immediate suspension. The burden of proof in expedited hearings under this subdivision shall be limited to the commissioner's demonstration that reasonable cause exists to believe that the license holder's actions or failure to comply with applicable law or rule poses, or if the actions of other individuals or conditions in the program poses an imminent risk of harm to the health, safety, or rights of persons served by the program.

 

(b) The administrative law judge shall issue findings of fact, conclusions, and a recommendation within ten working days from the date of hearing. The parties shall have ten calendar days to submit exceptions to the administrative law judge's report. The record shall close at the end of the ten-day period for submission of exceptions. The commissioner's final order shall be issued within ten working days from the close of the record. Within 90 calendar days after a final order affirming an immediate suspension, the commissioner shall make a determination regarding whether a final licensing sanction shall be issued under subdivision 3. The license holder shall continue to be prohibited from operation of the program during this 90-day period.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6880

(c) When the final order under paragraph (b) affirms an immediate suspension, and a final licensing sanction is issued under subdivision 3 and the license holder appeals that sanction, the license holder continues to be prohibited from operation of the program pending a final commissioner's order under section 245A.08, subdivision 5, regarding the final licensing sanction.

 

Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. License suspension, revocation, or fine. (a) The commissioner may suspend or revoke a license, or impose a fine if a license holder fails to comply fully with applicable laws or rules, if a license holder or, a controlling individual, an individual living in the household where the licensed services are provided or is otherwise subject to a background study has a disqualification which has not been set aside under section 245C.22, or if a license holder knowingly withholds relevant information from or gives false or misleading information to the commissioner in connection with an application for a license, in connection with the background study status of an individual, or during an investigation, or regarding compliance with applicable laws or rules. A license holder who has had a license suspended, revoked, or has been ordered to pay a fine must be given notice of the action by certified mail or personal service. If mailed, the notice must be mailed to the address shown on the application or the last known address of the license holder. The notice must state the reasons the license was suspended, revoked, or a fine was ordered.

 

(b) If the license was suspended or revoked, the notice must inform the license holder of the right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. The license holder may appeal an order suspending or revoking a license. The appeal of an order suspending or revoking a license must be made in writing by certified mail or personal service. If mailed, the appeal must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within ten calendar days after the license holder receives notice that the license has been suspended or revoked. If a request is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within ten calendar days after the license holder received the order. Except as provided in subdivision 2a, paragraph (c), a timely appeal of an order suspending or revoking a license shall stay the suspension or revocation until the commissioner issues a final order.

 

(c)(1) If the license holder was ordered to pay a fine, the notice must inform the license holder of the responsibility for payment of fines and the right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. The appeal of an order to pay a fine must be made in writing by certified mail or personal service. If mailed, the appeal must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within ten calendar days after the license holder receives notice that the fine has been ordered. If a request is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within ten calendar days after the license holder received the order.

 

(2) The license holder shall pay the fines assessed on or before the payment date specified. If the license holder fails to fully comply with the order, the commissioner may issue a second fine or suspend the license until the license holder complies. If the license holder receives state funds, the state, county, or municipal agencies or departments responsible for administering the funds shall withhold payments and recover any payments made while the license is suspended for failure to pay a fine. A timely appeal shall stay payment of the fine until the commissioner issues a final order.

 

(3) A license holder shall promptly notify the commissioner of human services, in writing, when a violation specified in the order to forfeit a fine is corrected. If upon reinspection the commissioner determines that a violation has not been corrected as indicated by the order to forfeit a fine, the commissioner may issue a second fine. The commissioner shall notify the license holder by certified mail or personal service that a second fine has been assessed. The license holder may appeal the second fine as provided under this subdivision.

 

(4) Fines shall be assessed as follows: the license holder shall forfeit $1,000 for each determination of maltreatment of a child under section 626.556 or the maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557; the license holder shall forfeit $200 for each occurrence of a violation of law or rule governing matters of health, safety,


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6881

or supervision, including but not limited to the provision of adequate staff-to-child or adult ratios, and failure to submit a background study; and the license holder shall forfeit $100 for each occurrence of a violation of law or rule other than those subject to a $1,000 or $200 fine above. For purposes of this section, "occurrence" means each violation identified in the commissioner's fine order.

 

(5) When a fine has been assessed, the license holder may not avoid payment by closing, selling, or otherwise transferring the licensed program to a third party. In such an event, the license holder will be personally liable for payment. In the case of a corporation, each controlling individual is personally and jointly liable for payment.

 

Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.07, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 6. Appeal of multiple sanctions. (a) When the license holder appeals more than one licensing action or sanction that were simultaneously issued by the commissioner, the license holder shall specify the actions or sanctions that are being appealed.

 

(b) If there are different timelines prescribed in statutes for the licensing actions or sanctions being appealed, the license holder must submit the appeal within the longest of those timelines specified in statutes.

 

(c) The appeal must be made in writing by certified mail or personal service. If mailed, the appeal must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within the prescribed timeline with the first day beginning the day after the license holder receives the certified letter. If a request is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within the prescribed timeline with the first day beginning the day after the license holder receives the certified letter.

 

(d) When there are different timelines prescribed in statutes for the appeal of licensing actions or sanctions simultaneously issued by the commissioner, the commissioner shall specify in the notice to the license holder the timeline for appeal as specified under paragraph (b).

 

Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.08, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2a. Consolidated contested case hearings. (a) When a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, subdivision 3, is based on a disqualification for which reconsideration was requested and which was not set aside under section 245C.22, the scope of the contested case hearing shall include the disqualification and the licensing sanction or denial of a license, unless otherwise specified in this subdivision. When the licensing sanction or denial of a license is based on a determination of maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557, or a disqualification for serious or recurring maltreatment which was not set aside, the scope of the contested case hearing shall include the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and the licensing sanction or denial of a license, unless otherwise specified in this subdivision. In such cases, a fair hearing under section 256.045 shall not be conducted as provided for in sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d. When a fine is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment and the fine is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination, if the license holder appeals the maltreatment and fine, the scope of the contested case hearing shall include the maltreatment determination and fine and reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall not be conducted as provided for in sections 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

(b) Except for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment determination under sections 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of a disqualification under section 245C.22, shall not be conducted when:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6882

(1) a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder is based on serious or recurring maltreatment;

 

(2) the denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination or disqualification; and

 

(3) the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction. In these cases, a fair hearing shall not be conducted under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d. The scope of the contested case hearing must include the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction.

 

Notwithstanding clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall be conducted under section 626.556, subdivision 10i, and section 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted under section 245C.22. In such cases, a fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

(c) In consolidated contested case hearings regarding sanctions issued in family child care, child foster care, family adult day services, and adult foster care, the county attorney shall defend the commissioner's orders in accordance with section 245A.16, subdivision 4.

 

(c) (d) The commissioner's final order under subdivision 5 is the final agency action on the issue of maltreatment and disqualification, including for purposes of subsequent background studies under chapter 245C and is the only administrative appeal of the final agency determination, specifically, including a challenge to the accuracy and completeness of data under section 13.04.

 

(d) (e) When consolidated hearings under this subdivision involve a licensing sanction based on a previous maltreatment determination for which the commissioner has issued a final order in an appeal of that determination under section 256.045, or the individual failed to exercise the right to appeal the previous maltreatment determination under section 626.556, subdivision 10i, or 626.557, subdivision 9d, the commissioner's order is conclusive on the issue of maltreatment. In such cases, the scope of the administrative law judge's review shall be limited to the disqualification and the licensing sanction or denial of a license. In the case of a denial of a license or a licensing sanction issued to a facility based on a maltreatment determination regarding an individual who is not the license holder or a household member, the scope of the administrative law judge's review includes the maltreatment determination.

 

(e) (f) The hearings of all parties may be consolidated into a single contested case hearing upon consent of all parties and the administrative law judge, if:

 

(1) a maltreatment determination or disqualification, which was not set aside under section 245C.22, is the basis for a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, and;

 

(2) the disqualified subject is an individual other than the license holder and upon whom a background study must be conducted under section 245C.03, the hearings of all parties may be consolidated into a single contested case hearing upon consent of all parties and the administrative law judge.; and

 

(3) the individual has a hearing right under section 245C.27.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6883

(f) Notwithstanding section 245C.27, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), (g) When a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07 is based on a disqualification for which reconsideration was requested and was not set aside under section 245C.22, and the disqualification was based on a conviction or an admission to any crimes listed in section 245C.15 individual otherwise has no hearing right under section 245C.27, the scope of the administrative law judge's review shall include the denial or sanction and a determination whether the disqualification should be set aside, unless section 245C.24 prohibits the set-aside of the disqualification. In determining whether the disqualification should be set aside, the administrative law judge shall consider the factors under section 245C.22, subdivision 4, to determine whether the individual poses a risk of harm to any person receiving services from the license holder.

 

(g) (h) Notwithstanding section 245C.30, subdivision 5, when a licensing sanction under section 245A.07 is based on the termination of a variance under section 245C.30, subdivision 4, the scope of the administrative law judge's review shall include the sanction and a determination whether the disqualification should be set aside, unless section 245C.24 prohibits the set-aside of the disqualification. In determining whether the disqualification should be set aside, the administrative law judge shall consider the factors under section 245C.22, subdivision 4, to determine whether the individual poses a risk of harm to any person receiving services from the license holder.

 

Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.10, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. County fees for background studies and licensing inspections. (a) For purposes of family and group family child care licensing under this chapter, a county agency may charge a fee to an applicant or license holder to recover the actual cost of background studies, but in any case not to exceed $100 annually. A county agency may also charge a fee to an applicant or license holder to recover the actual cost of licensing inspections, but in any case not to exceed $150 annually.

 

(b) A county agency may charge a fee to a legal nonlicensed child care provider or applicant for authorization to recover the actual cost of background studies completed under section 119B.125, but in any case not to exceed $100 annually.

 

(c) Counties may elect to reduce or waive the fees in paragraph (a) or (b):

 

(1) in cases of financial hardship;

 

(2) if the county has a shortage of providers in the county's area;

 

(3) for new providers; or

 

(4) for providers who have attained at least 16 hours of training before seeking initial licensure.

 

(d) Counties may allow providers to pay the applicant fees in paragraph (a) or (b) on an installment basis for up to one year. If the provider is receiving child care assistance payments from the state, the provider may have the fees under paragraph (a) or (b) deducted from the child care assistance payments for up to one year and the state shall reimburse the county for the county fees collected in this manner.

 

(e) For purposes of adult foster care and child foster care licensing under this chapter, a county agency may charge a fee to a corporate applicant or corporate license holder to recover the actual cost of background studies. A county agency may also charge a fee to a corporate applicant or corporate license holder to recover the actual cost of licensing inspections, not to exceed $500 annually.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6884

(f) Counties may elect to reduce or waive the fees in paragraph (e) under the following circumstances: (1) in cases of financial hardship; (2) if the county has a shortage of providers in the county's area; or (3) for new providers.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2008.

 

Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.11, subdivision 7, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 7. Adult foster care; variance for alternate overnight supervision. (a) The commissioner may grant a variance under section 245A.04, subdivision 9, to rule parts requiring a caregiver to be present in an adult foster care home during normal sleeping hours to allow for alternative methods of overnight supervision. The commissioner may grant the variance if the local county licensing agency recommends the variance and the county recommendation includes documentation verifying that:

 

(1) the county has approved the license holder's plan for alternative methods of providing overnight supervision and determined the plan protects the residents' health, safety, and rights;

 

(2) the license holder has obtained written and signed informed consent from each resident or each resident's legal representative documenting the resident's or legal representative's agreement with the alternative method of overnight supervision; and

 

(3) the alternative method of providing overnight supervision, which may include the use of technology, is specified for each resident in the resident's: (i) individualized plan of care; (ii) individual service plan under section 256B.092, subdivision 1b, if required; or (iii) individual resident placement agreement under Minnesota Rules, part 9555.5105, subpart 19, if required.

 

(b) To be eligible for a variance under paragraph (a), the adult foster care license holder must not have had a licensing action under section 245A.06 or 245A.07 during the prior 24 months based on failure to provide adequate supervision, health care services, or resident safety in the adult foster care home.

 

(c) A license holder requesting a variance under this subdivision to utilize technology as a component of a plan for alternative overnight supervision may request the commissioner's review in the absence of a county recommendation. Upon receipt of such a request from a license holder, the commissioner shall review the variance request with the county.

 

Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.14, subdivision 8, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 8. Experienced aides; child care centers. (a) An individual employed as an aide at a child care center may work with children without being directly supervised for an amount of time that does not exceed 25 percent of the child care center's daily hours if:

 

(1) a teacher is in the facility;

 

(2) the individual has received within the last three years first aid training within the last three years that meets the requirements under section 245A.40, subdivision 3, and CPR training within the last two years that meets the requirements under section 245A.40, subdivision 4;

 

(3) the individual is at least 20 years old; and


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6885

(4) the individual has at least 4,160 hours of child care experience as a staff member in a licensed child care center or as the license holder of a family day care home, 120 days of which must be in the employment of the current company.

 

(b) A child care center that uses experienced aides under this subdivision must notify parents or guardians by posting the notification in each classroom that uses experienced aides, identifying which staff member is the experienced aide. Records of experienced aide usage must be kept on-site and given to the commissioner upon request.

 

(c) A child care center may not use the experienced aide provision for one year following two determined experienced aide violations within a one-year period.

 

(d) A child care center may use one experienced aide per every four full-time child care classroom staff.

 

Sec. 15. [245A.1435] REDUCTION OF RISK OF SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME IN LICENSED PROGRAMS.

 

When a license holder is placing an infant to sleep, the license holder must place the infant on the infant's back, unless the license holder has documentation from the infant's parent directing an alternative sleeping position for the infant, and must place the infant in a crib with a firm mattress. The license holder must not place pillows, quilts, comforters, sheepskin, pillow-like stuffed toys, or other soft products in the crib with the infant. Licensed child care providers must meet the crib requirements under section 245A.146.

 

Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.144, is amended to read:

 

245A.144 SUDDEN INFANT DEATH AND SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME FOR CHILD FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS.

 

(a) License holders Licensed child foster care providers that care for infants must document that before staff persons, and caregivers, and helpers assist in the care of infants, they are instructed on the standards in section 245A.1435 and receive training on reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome. This section does not apply to emergency relative foster care under section 245A.035. The training on reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome may be provided as:

 

(1) orientation training to child care center staff under Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0035, subpart 1, and to child foster care providers, who care for infants, under Minnesota Rules, part 2960.3070, subpart 1; or

 

(2) initial training to family and group family child care providers under Minnesota Rules, part 9502.0385, subpart 2;

 

(3) (2) in-service training to child care center staff under Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0035, subpart 4, and to child foster care providers, who care for infants, under Minnesota Rules, part 2960.3070, subpart 2; or.

 

(4) ongoing training to family and group family child care providers under Minnesota Rules, part 9502.0385, subpart 3.

 

(b) Training required under this section must be at least one hour in length and must be completed at least once every five years. At a minimum, the training must address the risk factors related to sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome, means of reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome in child care, and license holder communication with parents regarding reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6886

(c) Training for family and group family child care providers must be approved by the county licensing agency according to Minnesota Rules, part 9502.0385.

 

(d) (c) Training for child foster care providers must be approved by the county licensing agency and fulfills, in part, training required under Minnesota Rules, part 2960.3070.

 

Sec. 17. [245A.1444] TRAINING ON RISK OF SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME AND SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME BY OTHER PROGRAMS.

 

A licensed chemical dependency treatment program that serves clients with infants who sleep at the program and a licensed children's residential facility that serves infants must document that before program staff persons or volunteers assist in the care of infants, they are instructed on the standards in section 245A.1435 and they receive training on reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome. The training conducted under this section may be used to fulfill training requirements under Minnesota Rules, parts 2960.0100, subpart 3; and 9530.6490, subpart 4, item B.

 

This section does not apply to child care centers or family child care programs governed by sections 245A.40 and 245A.50.

 

Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.1445, is amended to read:

 

245A.1445 DANGERS OF SHAKING INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN.

 

The commissioner shall make available for viewing by all licensed and legal nonlicensed child care providers a video presentation on the dangers associated with shaking infants and young children. The video presentation shall be part of the initial and annual training of licensed child care providers. Legal nonlicensed child care providers may participate at their option in a video presentation session offered under this section. The commissioner shall provide to child care providers and interested individuals, at cost, copies of a video approved by the commissioner of health under section 144.574 on the dangers associated with shaking infants and young children.

 

Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.145, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Policies and procedures. (a) All licensed child care providers must develop policies and procedures for reporting suspected child maltreatment that fulfill the requirements in section 626.556 and must develop policies and procedures for reporting complaints about the operation of a child care program. The policies and procedures must include the telephone numbers of the local county child protection agency for reporting suspected maltreatment; the county licensing agency for family and group family child care providers; and the state licensing agency for child care centers for reporting other concerns.

 

(b) The policies and procedures required in paragraph (a) must:

 

(1) be provided to the parents of all children at the time of enrollment in the child care program; and

 

(2) be made available upon request.

 

Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.18, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Child passenger restraint systems; training requirement. (a) Family and group family child care, child care centers, child foster care, and other Programs licensed by the Department of Human Services under Minnesota Rules, chapter 2960, that serve a child or children under nine years of age must document training that fulfills the requirements in this subdivision.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6887

(b) Before a license holder, staff person, or caregiver, or helper transports a child or children under age nine in a motor vehicle, the person transporting the child must satisfactorily complete training on the proper use and installation of child restraint systems in motor vehicles. Training completed under this section may be used to meet initial or ongoing training under the following:

 

(1) Minnesota Rules, part 2960.3070, subparts 1 and 2;.

 

(2) Minnesota Rules, part 9502.0385, subparts 2 and 3; and

 

(3) Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0035, subparts 1 and 4.

 

For all providers licensed prior to July 1, 2006, the training required in this subdivision must be obtained by December 31, 2007.

 

(c) Training required under this section must be at least one hour in length, completed at orientation or initial training, and repeated at least once every five years. At a minimum, the training must address the proper use of child restraint systems based on the child's size, weight, and age, and the proper installation of a car seat or booster seat in the motor vehicle used by the license holder to transport the child or children.

 

(d) Training under paragraph (c) must be provided by individuals who are certified and approved by the Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety. License holders may obtain a list of certified and approved trainers through the Department of Public Safety Web site or by contacting the agency.

 

(e) Child care providers that only transport school age children as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 16, in school buses as defined in section 169.01, subdivision 6, clauses (1) to (4), are exempt from this subdivision.

 

Sec. 21. [245A.40] CHILD CARE CENTER TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.

 

Subdivision 1. Orientation. The child care center license holder must ensure that every staff person and volunteer is given orientation training and successfully completes the training before starting assigned duties. The orientation training in this subdivision applies to volunteers who will have direct contact with or access to children and who are not under the direct supervision of a staff person. Completion of the orientation must be documented in the individual's personnel record. The orientation training must include information about:

 

(1) the center's philosophy, child care program, and procedures for maintaining health and safety and handling emergencies and accidents;

 

(2) specific job responsibilities;

 

(3) the behavior guidance standards in Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0055; and

 

(4) the reporting responsibilities in section 626.556, and Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0130.

 

Subd. 2. Child growth and development training. (a) For purposes of child care centers, the director and all staff hired after July 1, 2006, shall complete and document at least two hours of child growth and development training within the first year of employment. For purposes of this subdivision, "child growth and development training" means training in understanding how children acquire language and develop physically, cognitively, emotionally, and socially. Training completed under this subdivision may be used to meet the orientation training requirements under subdivision 1 and the in-service training requirements under subdivision 7.

 

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), individuals are exempt from this requirement if they:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6888

(1) have taken a three-credit college course on early childhood development within the past five years;

 

(2) have received a baccalaureate or master's degree in early childhood education or school-age child care within the past five years;

 

(3) are licensed in Minnesota as a prekindergarten teacher, an early childhood educator, a kindergarten to sixth grade teacher with a prekindergarten specialty, an early childhood special education teacher, or an elementary teacher with a kindergarten endorsement; or

 

(4) have received a baccalaureate degree with a Montessori certificate within the past five years.

 

Subd. 3. First aid. All teachers and assistant teachers in a child care center governed by Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0170, and at least one staff person during field trips and when transporting children in care, must satisfactorily complete first aid training within 90 days of the start of work, unless the training has been completed within the previous three years. The first aid training must be repeated at least every three years, documented in the person's personnel record and indicated on the center's staffing chart, and provided by an individual approved as a first aid instructor. This training may be less than eight hours.

 

Subd. 4. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. (a) When children are present in a child care center governed by Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0170, at least one staff person must be present in the center who has been trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and in the treatment of obstructed airways. The CPR training must have been provided by an individual approved to provide CPR instruction, must be repeated at least once every three years, and must be documented in the staff person's records.

 

(b) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training may be provided for less than four hours.

 

(c) Persons qualified to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation training shall include individuals approved as cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructors.

 

Subd. 5. Sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome training. (a) License holders must document that before staff persons care for infants, they are instructed on the standards in section 245A.1435 and receive training on reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome. The training in this subdivision may be provided as orientation training under subdivision 1 and in-service training under subdivision 7.

 

(b) Training required under this subdivision must be at least one hour in length and must be completed at least once every five years. At a minimum, the training must address the risk factors related to sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome, means of reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome in child care, and license holder communication with parents regarding reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome.

 

(c) The commissioner shall make available for viewing a video presentation on the dangers associated with shaking infants and young children. The video presentation must be part of the orientation and annual in-service training of licensed child care centers. The commissioner shall provide to child care providers and interested individuals, at cost, copies of a video approved by the commissioner of health under section 144.574 on the dangers associated with shaking infants and young children.

 

Subd. 6. Child passenger restraint systems; training requirement. (a) A license holder must comply with all seat belt and child passenger restraint system requirements under section 169.685.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6889

(b) Child care centers that serve a child or children under nine years of age must document training that fulfills the requirements in this subdivision.

 

(1) Before a license holder transports a child or children under age nine in a motor vehicle, the person placing the child or children in a passenger restraint must satisfactorily complete training on the proper use and installation of child restraint systems in motor vehicles. Training completed under this subdivision may be used to meet orientation training under subdivision 1 and in-service training under subdivision 7.

 

(2) Training required under this subdivision must be at least one hour in length, completed at orientation, and repeated at least once every five years. At a minimum, the training must address the proper use of child restraint systems based on the child's size, weight, and age, and the proper installation of a car seat or booster seat in the motor vehicle used by the license holder to transport the child or children.

 

(3) Training required under this subdivision must be provided by individuals who are certified and approved by the Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety. License holders may obtain a list of certified and approved trainers through the Department of Public Safety Web site or by contacting the agency.

 

(4) Child care providers that only transport school-age children as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 16, in child care buses as defined in section 169.448, subdivision 1, paragraph (e), are exempt from this subdivision.

 

Subd. 7. In-service. (a) A license holder must ensure that an annual in-service training plan is developed and carried out and that it meets the requirements in clauses (1) to (7). The in-service training plan must:

 

(1) be consistent with the center's child care program plan;

 

(2) meet the training needs of individual staff persons as specified in each staff person's annual evaluation report;

 

(3) provide training, at least one-fourth of which is by a resource not affiliated with the license holder;

 

(4) include Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0170, relevant to the staff person's position and must occur within two weeks of initial employment;

 

(5) provide that at least one-half of the annual in-service training completed by a staff person each year pertains to the age of children for which the person is providing care;

 

(6) provide that no more than four hours of each annual in-service training requirement relate to administration, finances, and records training for a teacher, assistant teacher, or aide; and

 

(7) provide that the remainder of the in-service training requirement be met by participation in training in child growth and development; learning environment and curriculum; assessment and planning for individual needs; interactions with children; families and communities; health, safety, and nutrition; and program planning and evaluation.

 

(b) For purposes of this subdivision, the following terms have the meanings given them.

 

(1) "Child growth and development training" has the meaning given it in subdivision 2, paragraph (a).

 

(2) "Learning environment and curriculum" means training in establishing an environment that provides learning experiences to meet each child's needs, capabilities, and interests, including early childhood education methods or theory, recreation, sports, promoting creativity in the arts, arts and crafts methods or theory, and early childhood special education methods or theory.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6890

(3) "Assessment and planning for individual needs" means training in observing and assessing what children know and can do in order to provide curriculum and instruction that addresses their developmental and learning needs, including children with special needs.

 

(4) "Interactions with children" means training in establishing supportive relationships with children and guiding them as individuals and as part of a group, including child study techniques and behavior guidance.

 

(5) "Families and communities" means training in working collaboratively with families, agencies, and organizations to meet children's needs and to encourage the community's involvement, including family studies and parent involvement.

 

(6) "Health, safety, and nutrition" means training in establishing and maintaining an environment that ensures children's health, safety, and nourishment, including first aid, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, child nutrition, and child abuse and neglect prevention.

 

(7) "Program planning and evaluation" means training in establishing, implementing, evaluating, and enhancing program operations.

 

(c) The director and all program staff persons must annually complete a number of hours of in-service training equal to at least two percent of the hours for which the director or program staff person is annually paid, unless one of the following is applicable.

 

(1) A teacher at a child care center must complete one percent of working hours of in-service training annually if the teacher:

 

(i) possesses a baccalaureate or master's degree in early childhood education or school-age care;

 

(ii) is licensed in Minnesota as a prekindergarten teacher, an early childhood educator, a kindergarten to sixth grade teacher with a prekindergarten specialty, an early childhood special education teacher, or an elementary teacher with a kindergarten endorsement; or

 

(iii) possesses a baccalaureate degree with a Montessori certificate.

 

(2) A teacher or assistant teacher at a child care center must complete one and one-half percent of working hours of in-service training annually if the individual is:

 

(i) a registered nurse or licensed practical nurse with experience working with infants;

 

(ii) possesses a Montessori certificate, a technical college certificate in early childhood development, or a child development associate certificate; or

 

(iii) possesses an associate of arts degree in early childhood education, a baccalaureate degree in child development, or a technical college diploma in early childhood development.

 

(d) The number of required training hours may be prorated for individuals not employed full time or for an entire year.

 

(e) The annual in-service training must be completed within the calendar year for which it was required. In-service training completed by staff persons is transferable upon a staff person's change in employment to another child care program.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6891

(f) The license holder must ensure that, when a staff person completes in-service training, the training is documented in the staff person's personnel record. The documentation must include the date training was completed, the goal of the training and topics covered, trainer's name and organizational affiliation, trainer's signed statement that training was successfully completed, and the director's approval of the training.

 

Subd. 8. Cultural dynamics and disabilities training for child care providers. (a) The training required of licensed child care center staff must include training in the cultural dynamics of early childhood development and child care. The cultural dynamics and disabilities training and skills development of child care providers must be designed to achieve outcomes for providers of child care that include, but are not limited to:

 

(1) an understanding and support of the importance of culture and differences in ability in children's identity development;

 

(2) understanding the importance of awareness of cultural differences and similarities in working with children and their families;

 

(3) understanding and support of the needs of families and children with differences in ability;

 

(4) developing skills to help children develop unbiased attitudes about cultural differences and differences in ability;

 

(5) developing skills in culturally appropriate caregiving; and

 

(6) developing skills in appropriate caregiving for children of different abilities.

 

(b) Curriculum for cultural dynamics and disability training shall be approved by the commissioner.

 

(c) The commissioner shall amend current rules relating to the training of the licensed child care center staff to require cultural dynamics training. Timelines established in the rule amendments for complying with the cultural dynamics training requirements must be based on the commissioner's determination that curriculum materials and trainers are available statewide.

 

(d) For programs caring for children with special needs, the license holder shall ensure that any additional staff training required by the child's individual child care program plan required under Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0065, subpart 3, is provided.

 

Sec. 22. [245A.50] FAMILY CHILD CARE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.

 

Subdivision 1. Initial training. (a) License holders, caregivers, and substitutes must comply with the training requirements in this section.

 

(b) Helpers who assist with care on a regular basis must complete six hours of training within one year after the date of initial employment.

 

Subd. 2. Child growth and development training. (a) For purposes of family and group family child care, the license holder and each adult caregiver who provides care in the licensed setting for more than 30 days in any 12-month period shall complete and document at least two hours of child growth and development training within the first year of licensure. For purposes of this subdivision, "child growth and development training" means training in understanding how children acquire language and develop physically, cognitively, emotionally, and socially.

 

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), individuals are exempt from this requirement if they:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6892

(1) have taken a three-credit course on early childhood development within the past five years;

 

(2) have received a baccalaureate or masters degree in early childhood education or school age child care within the past five years;

 

(3) are licensed in Minnesota as a prekindergarten teacher, an early childhood educator, a kindergarten to grade 6 teacher with a prekindergarten specialty, an early childhood special education teacher, or an elementary teacher with a kindergarten endorsement; or

 

(4) have received a baccalaureate degree with a Montessori certificate within the past five years.

 

Subd. 3. First aid. (a) When children are present in a family child care home governed by Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0315 to 9502.0445, at least one staff person must be present in the home who has been trained in first aid. The first aid training must have been provided by an individual approved to provide first aid instruction. First aid training may be less than eight hours and persons qualified to provide first aid training includes individuals approved as first aid instructors.

 

(b) A family child care provider is exempt from the first aid training requirements under this subdivision related to any substitute caregiver who provides less than 30 hours of care during any 12-month period.

 

(c) Video training reviewed and approved by the county licensing agency satisfies the training requirement of this subdivision.

 

Subd. 4. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. (a) When children are present in a family child care home governed by Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0315 to 9502.0445, at least one staff person must be present in the home who has been trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and in the treatment of obstructed airways. The CPR training must have been provided by an individual approved to provide CPR instruction, must be repeated at least once every three years, and must be documented in the staff person's records.

 

(b) A family child care provider is exempt from the CPR training requirement in this subdivision related to any substitute caregiver who provides less than 30 hours of care during any 12-month period.

 

(c) Video training reviewed and approved by the county licensing agency satisfies the training requirement of this subdivision.

 

Subd. 5. Sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome training. (a) License holders must document that before staff persons, caregivers, and helpers assist in the care of infants, they are instructed on the standards in section 245A.1435 and receive training on reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome. The training in this subdivision may be provided as initial training under subdivision 1 or ongoing training under subdivision 7.

 

(b) Training required under this subdivision must be at least one hour in length and must be completed at least once every five years. At a minimum, the training must address the risk factors related to sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome, means of reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome in child care, and license holder communication with parents regarding reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome and shaken baby syndrome.

 

(c) Training for family and group family child care providers must be approved by the county licensing agency.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6893

(d) The commissioner shall make available for viewing by all licensed child care providers a video presentation on the dangers associated with shaking infants and young children. The video presentation shall be part of the initial and ongoing training of licensed child care providers. The commissioner shall provide to child care providers and interested individuals, at cost, copies of a video approved by the commissioner of health under section 144.574 on the dangers associated with shaking infants and young children.

 

Subd. 6. Child passenger restraint systems; training requirement. (a) A license holder must comply with all seat belt and child passenger restraint system requirements under section 169.685.

 

(b) Family and group family child care programs licensed by the Department of Human Services that serve a child or children under nine years of age must document training that fulfills the requirements in this subdivision.

 

(1) Before a license holder, staff person, caregiver, or helper transports a child or children under age nine in a motor vehicle, the person placing the child or children in a passenger restraint must satisfactorily complete training on the proper use and installation of child restraint systems in motor vehicles. Training completed under this subdivision may be used to meet initial training under subdivision 1, or ongoing training under subdivision 7.

 

(2) Training required under this subdivision must be at least one hour in length, completed at initial training, and repeated at least once every five years. At a minimum, the training must address the proper use of child restraint systems based on the child's size, weight, and age, and the proper installation of a car seat or booster seat in the motor vehicle used by the license holder to transport the child or children.

 

(3) Training under this subdivision must be provided by individuals who are certified and approved by the Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety. License holders may obtain a list of certified and approved trainers through the Department of Public Safety Web site or by contacting the agency.

 

(c) Child care providers that only transport school age children as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 19, paragraph (f), in child care buses as defined in section 169.448, subdivision 1, paragraph (e), are exempt from this subdivision.

 

Subd. 7. Training requirements for family and group family child care. For purposes of family and group family child care, the license holder and each primary caregiver must complete eight hours of training each year. For purposes of this subdivision, a primary caregiver is an adult caregiver who provides services in the licensed setting for more than 30 days in any 12-month period. Ongoing training subjects must be selected from the following areas:

 

(1) "child growth and development training" has the meaning given in subdivision 2, paragraph (a);

 

(2) "learning environment and curriculum" includes training in establishing an environment and providing activities that provide learning experiences to meet each child's needs, capabilities, and interests;

 

(3) "assessment and planning for individual needs" includes training in observing and assessing what children know and can do in order to provide curriculum and instruction that addresses their developmental and learning needs, including children with special needs and bilingual children or children for whom English is not their primary language;

 

(4) "interactions with children" includes training in establishing supportive relationships with children, guiding them as individuals and as part of a group;

 

(5) "families and communities" includes training in working collaboratively with families and agencies or organizations to meet children's needs and to encourage the community's involvement;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6894

(6) "health, safety, and nutrition" includes training in establishing and maintaining an environment that ensures children's health, safety, and nourishment, including child abuse, maltreatment, prevention, and reporting; home and fire safety; child injury prevention; communicable disease prevention and control; First Aid; and CPR; and

 

(7) "program planning and evaluation" includes training in establishing, implementing, evaluating, and enhancing program operations.

 

Subd. 8. Other required training requirements. (a) The training required of family and group family child care providers and staff must include training in the cultural dynamics of early childhood development and child care. The cultural dynamics and disabilities training and skills development of child care providers must be designed to achieve outcomes for providers of child care that include, but are not limited to:

 

(1) an understanding and support of the importance of culture and differences in ability in children's identity development;

 

(2) understanding the importance of awareness of cultural differences and similarities in working with children and their families;

 

(3) understanding and support of the needs of families and children with differences in ability;

 

(4) developing skills to help children develop unbiased attitudes about cultural differences and differences in ability;

 

(5) developing skills in culturally appropriate caregiving; and

 

(6) developing skills in appropriate caregiving for children of different abilities.

 

The commissioner shall approve the curriculum for cultural dynamics and disability training.

 

(b) The provider must meet the training requirement in section 245A.14, subdivision 11, paragraph (a), clause (4), to be eligible to allow a child cared for at the family child care or group family child care home to use the swimming pool located at the home.

 

Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.65, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. License holder requirements. All license holders serving vulnerable adults shall establish and enforce written policies and procedures related to suspected or alleged maltreatment, and shall orient clients and mandated reporters who are under the control of the license holder to these procedures, as defined in section 626.5572, subdivision 16.

 

(a) License holders must establish policies and procedures allowing but not mandating the internal reporting of alleged or suspected maltreatment. License holders shall ensure that the policies and procedures on internal reporting:

 

(1) meet all the requirements identified for the optional internal reporting policies and procedures in section 626.557, subdivision 4a; and

 

(2) identify the primary and secondary person or position to whom internal reports may be made and the primary and secondary person or position responsible for forwarding internal reports to the common entry point as defined in section 626.5572, subdivision 5. The secondary person must be involved when there is reason to believe that the primary person was involved in the alleged or suspected maltreatment.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6895

(b) The license holder shall:

 

(1) establish and maintain policies and procedures to ensure that an internal review is completed and that corrective action is taken as necessary to protect the health and safety of vulnerable adults when the facility has reason to know that an internal or external report of alleged or suspected maltreatment has been made. The review must include an evaluation of whether related policies and procedures were followed, whether the policies and procedures were adequate, whether there is a need for additional staff training, whether the reported event is similar to past events with the vulnerable adults or the services involved, and whether there is a need for any further corrective action to be taken by the facility license holder to protect the health and safety of vulnerable adults;. Based on the results of this review, the license holder must develop, document, and implement a corrective action plan designed to correct current lapses and prevent future lapses in performance by individuals or the license holder, if any.

 

(2) identify the primary and secondary person or position who will ensure that, when required, internal reviews are completed. The secondary person shall be involved when there is reason to believe that the primary person was involved in the alleged or suspected maltreatment; and

 

(3) document and make internal reviews accessible to the commissioner upon the commissioner's request. The documentation provided to the commissioner by the license holder may consist of a completed checklist that verifies completion of each of the requirements of the review.

 

(c) The license holder shall provide an orientation to the internal and external reporting procedures to all persons receiving services. The orientation shall include the telephone number for the license holder's common entry point as defined in section 626.5572, subdivision 5. If applicable, the person's legal representative must be notified of the orientation. The program shall provide this orientation for each new person within 24 hours of admission, or for persons who would benefit more from a later orientation, the orientation may take place within 72 hours.

 

(d) The license holder shall post a copy of the internal and external reporting policies and procedures, including the telephone number of the common entry point as defined in section 626.5572, subdivision 5, in a prominent location in the program and have it available upon request to mandated reporters, persons receiving services, and the person's legal representatives.

 

Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245A.65, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 1a. Determination of vulnerable adult status. (a) A license holder that provides services to adults who are excluded from the definition of vulnerable adult under section 626.5572, subdivision 21, clause (2), must determine whether the person is a vulnerable adult under section 626.5572, subdivision 21, clause (4). This determination must be made within 24 hours of:

 

(1) admission to the licensed program; and

 

(2) any incident that:

 

(i) was reported under section 626.557; or

 

(ii) would have been required to be reported under section 626.557, if one or more of the adults involved in the incident had been vulnerable adults.

 

(b) Upon determining that a person receiving services is a vulnerable adult under section 626.5572, subdivision 21, clause (4), all requirements relative to vulnerable adults under section 626.557 and chapter 245A must be met by the license holder.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6896

Sec. 25. [245A.66] REQUIREMENTS; MALTREATMENT OF MINORS.

 

Except for family child care settings and foster care for children in the license holder's residence, license holders serving children shall:

 

(1) establish and maintain policies and procedures to ensure that an internal review is completed and that corrective action is taken if necessary to protect the health and safety of children in care when the facility has reason to know that an internal or external report of alleged or suspected maltreatment has been made. The review must include an evaluation of whether:

 

(i) related policies and procedures were followed;

 

(ii) the policies and procedures were adequate;

 

(iii) there is a need for additional staff training;

 

(iv) the reported event is similar to past events with the children or the services involved; and

 

(v) there is a need for corrective action by the license holder to protect the health and safety of children in care.

 

Based on the results of this review, the license holder must develop, document, and implement a corrective action plan designed to correct current lapses and prevent future lapses in performance by individuals or the license holder, if any;

 

(2) identify the primary and secondary person or position who will ensure that, when required, internal reviews are completed. The secondary person shall be involved when there is reason to believe that the primary person was involved in the alleged or suspected maltreatment; and

 

(3) document that the internal review has been completed and provide documentation showing the review was completed to the commissioner upon the commissioner's request. The documentation provided to the commissioner by the license holder may consist of a completed checklist that verifies completion of each of the requirements of the review.

 

Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 9a. Conviction. "Conviction" has the meaning given in section 609.02, subdivision 5.

 

Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.05, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Additional information from individual studied. (a) For purposes of completing the background study, the commissioner may request additional information of the individual, such as the individual's Social Security number or race. The individual is not required to provide this information to the commissioner.

 

(b) The commissioner may also require additional information if the commissioner determines the information is necessary to complete the background study. Failure to provide the required information may result in a disqualification pursuant to section 245C.09.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6897

Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.07, is amended to read:

 

245C.07 STUDY SUBJECT AFFILIATED WITH MULTIPLE FACILITIES.

 

(a) When a license holder, applicant, or other entity owns multiple facilities programs or services that are licensed by the Department of Human Services, Department of Health, or Department of Corrections, only one background study is required for an individual who provides direct contact services in one or more of the licensed facilities programs or services if:

 

(1) the license holder designates one individual with one address and telephone number as the person to receive sensitive background study information for the multiple licensed programs or services that depend on the same background study; and

 

(2) the individual designated to receive the sensitive background study information is capable of determining, upon request of the department, whether a background study subject is providing direct contact services in one or more of the license holder's programs or services and, if so, at which location or locations.

 

(b) When a background study is being initiated by a licensed facility program or service or a foster care provider that is also registered under chapter 144D, a study subject affiliated with multiple licensed facilities programs or services may attach to the background study form a cover letter indicating the additional facilities' names of the programs or services, addresses, and background study identification numbers.

 

When the commissioner receives a notice, the commissioner shall notify each facility program or service identified by the background study subject of the study results.

 

The background study notice the commissioner sends to the subsequent agencies shall satisfy those facilities' programs' or services' responsibilities for initiating a background study on that individual.

 

Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.08, is amended to read:

 

245C.08 BACKGROUND STUDY; INFORMATION COMMISSIONER REVIEWS.

 

Subdivision 1. Background studies conducted by commissioner of human services. (a) For a background study conducted by the commissioner, the commissioner shall review:

 

(1) information related to names of substantiated perpetrators of maltreatment of vulnerable adults that has been received by the commissioner as required under section 626.557, subdivision 9c, paragraph (i);

 

(2) the commissioner's records relating to the maltreatment of minors in licensed programs, and from county agency findings of maltreatment of minors as indicated through the social service information system;

 

(3) information from juvenile courts as required in subdivision 4 for individuals listed in section 245C.03, subdivision 1, clauses (2), (5), and (6); and

 

(4) information from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

 

(b) Notwithstanding expungement by a court, the commissioner may consider information obtained under paragraph (a), clauses (3) and (4), unless the commissioner received notice of the petition for expungement and the court order for expungement is directed specifically to the commissioner.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6898

Subd. 2. Background studies conducted by a county or private agency. (a) For a background study conducted by a county or private agency for child foster care, adult foster care, and family child care homes, the commissioner shall review:

 

(1) information from the county agency's record of substantiated maltreatment of adults and the maltreatment of minors;

 

(2) information from juvenile courts as required in subdivision 4 for individuals listed in section 245C.03, subdivision 1, clauses (2), (5), and (6); and

 

(3) information from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension; and.

 

(4) arrest and investigative records maintained by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, county attorneys, county sheriffs, courts, county agencies, local police, the National Criminal Records Repository, and criminal records from other states.

 

(b) If the individual has resided in the county for less than five years, the study shall include the records specified under paragraph (a) for the previous county or counties of residence for the past five years.

 

(c) Notwithstanding expungement by a court, the county or private agency may consider information obtained under paragraph (a), clauses (3) and (4), unless the commissioner received notice of the petition for expungement and the court order for expungement is directed specifically to the commissioner.

 

Subd. 3. Arrest and investigative information. (a) For any background study completed under this section, if the commissioner has reasonable cause to believe the information is pertinent to the disqualification of an individual, the commissioner also may review arrest and investigative information from:

 

(1) the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension;

 

(2) the commissioner of health;

 

(3) a county attorney;

 

(4) a county sheriff;

 

(5) a county agency;

 

(6) a local chief of police;

 

(7) other states;

 

(8) the courts; or

 

(9) the Federal Bureau of Investigation.;

 

(10) the National Criminal Records Repository; and

 

(11) criminal records from other states.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6899

(b) The commissioner is not required to conduct more than one review of a subject's records from the Federal Bureau of Investigation if a review of the subject's criminal history with the Federal Bureau of Investigation has already been completed by the commissioner and there has been no break in the subject's affiliation with the license holder who initiated the background study.

 

Subd. 4. Juvenile court records. (a) The commissioner shall review records from the juvenile courts for an individual studied under section 245C.03, subdivision 1, clauses (2) and (5).

 

(b) For individuals studied under section 245C.03, subdivision 1, clauses (1), (3), (4), and (6), and subdivision 2, who are ages 13 to 17, the commissioner shall review records from the juvenile courts when the commissioner has reasonable cause.

 

(c) The juvenile courts shall help with the study by giving the commissioner existing juvenile court records on individuals described in section 245C.03, subdivision 1, clauses (2), (5), and (6), relating to delinquency proceedings held within either the five years immediately preceding the background study or the five years immediately preceding the individual's 18th birthday, whichever time period is longer.

 

(d) For purposes of this chapter, a finding that a delinquency petition is proven in juvenile court shall be considered a conviction in state district court.

 

(e) The commissioner shall destroy juvenile court records obtained under this subdivision when the subject of the records reaches age 23. Juvenile courts shall provide orders of involuntary and voluntary termination of parental rights under section 260C.301 to the commissioner upon request for purposes of conducting a background study under this chapter.

 

Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Disqualification; licensing action. An applicant's, license holder's, or other entity's failure or refusal to cooperate with the commissioner, including failure to provide additional information required under section 245C.05, is reasonable cause to disqualify a subject, deny a license application, or immediately suspend or revoke a license or registration.

 

Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.11, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 4. Background study. A county agency may accept a background study completed by the commissioner under this chapter in place of the background study required under section 245A.16, subdivision 3, for educational programs that train individuals by providing direct contact services in licensed programs.

 

Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.13, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Direct contact pending completion of background study. The subject of a background study may not perform any activity requiring a background study under paragraph (b) until the commissioner has issued one of the notices under paragraph (a).

 

(a) Notices from the commissioner required prior to activity under paragraph (b) include:

 

(1) a notice of the study results under section 245C.17 stating that:

 

(i) the individual is not disqualified; or


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6900

(ii) more time is needed to complete the study but the individual is not required to be removed from direct contact or access to people receiving services prior to completion of the study as provided under section 245A.17 245C.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (b) or (c);

 

(2) a notice that a disqualification has been set aside under section 245C.23; or

 

(3) a notice that a variance has been granted related to the individual under section 245C.30.

 

(b) Activities prohibited prior to receipt of notice under paragraph (a) include:

 

(1) being issued a license;

 

(2) living in the household where the licensed program will be provided;

 

(3) providing direct contact services to persons served by a program unless the subject is under continuous direct supervision; or

 

(4) having access to persons receiving services if the background study was completed under section 144.057, subdivision 1, or 245C.03, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), (5), or (6), unless the subject is under continuous direct supervision.

 

Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.14, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Disqualification from direct contact. (a) The commissioner shall disqualify an individual who is the subject of a background study from any position allowing direct contact with persons receiving services from the license holder or entity identified in section 245C.03, upon receipt of information showing, or when a background study completed under this chapter shows any of the following:

 

(1) a conviction of or, admission to, or Alford plea to one or more crimes listed in section 245C.15, regardless of whether the conviction or admission is a felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor level crime;

 

(2) a preponderance of the evidence indicates the individual has committed an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15, regardless of whether the preponderance of the evidence is for a felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor level crime; or

 

(3) an investigation results in an administrative determination listed under section 245C.15, subdivision 4, paragraph (b).

 

(b) No individual who is disqualified following a background study under section 245C.03, subdivisions 1 and 2, may be retained in a position involving direct contact with persons served by a program or entity identified in section 245C.03, unless the commissioner has provided written notice under section 245C.17 stating that:

 

(1) the individual may remain in direct contact during the period in which the individual may request reconsideration as provided in section 245C.21, subdivision 2;

 

(2) the commissioner has set aside the individual's disqualification for that program or entity identified in section 245C.03, as provided in section 245C.22, subdivision 4; or

 

(3) the license holder has been granted a variance for the disqualified individual under section 245C.30.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6901

Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Permanent disqualification. (a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) regardless of how much time has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) unless otherwise specified, regardless of the level of the offense, the individual has committed any of the following offenses: sections 243.166 (violation of predatory offender registration law); 609.185 (murder in the first degree); 609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder in the third degree); 609.20 (manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in the second degree); a felony offense under 609.221 or 609.222 (assault in the first or second degree); a felony offense under sections 609.2242 and 609.2243 (domestic assault), spousal abuse, child abuse or neglect, or a crime against children; 609.2247 (domestic assault by strangulation); 609.228 (great bodily harm caused by distribution of drugs); 609.245 (aggravated robbery); 609.25 (kidnapping); 609.2661 (murder of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2662 (murder of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.2663 (murder of an unborn child in the third degree); 609.322 (solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution); a felony offense under 609.324, subdivision 1 (other prohibited acts); 609.342 (criminal sexual conduct in the first degree); 609.343 (criminal sexual conduct in the second degree); 609.344 (criminal sexual conduct in the third degree); 609.345 (criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree); 609.3451 (criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree); 609.3453 (criminal sexual predatory conduct); 609.352 (solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct); 609.365 (incest); a felony offense under 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); a felony offense under 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); 609.561 (arson in the first degree); 609.66, subdivision 1e (drive-by shooting); 609.749, subdivision 3, 4, or 5 (felony-level harassment; stalking); 609.855, subdivision 5 (shooting at or in a public transit vehicle or facility); 617.23, subdivision 2, clause (1), or subdivision 3, clause (1) (indecent exposure involving a minor); 617.246 (use of minors in sexual performance prohibited); or 617.247 (possession of pictorial representations of minors). An individual also is disqualified under section 245C.14 regardless of how much time has passed since the involuntary termination of the individual's parental rights under section 260C.301.

 

(b) An individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes, permanently disqualifies the individual under section 245C.14.

 

(c) An individual's offense in any other state or country, where the elements of the offense are substantially similar to any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), permanently disqualifies the individual under section 245C.14.

 

(d) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court order. When a disqualification is based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an admission in court. When a disqualification is based on a preponderance of evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the incident, whichever occurs last.

 

(e) If the individual studied commits one of the offenses listed in paragraph (a) that is specified as a felony-level only offense, but the sentence or level of offense is a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor, the individual is disqualified, but the disqualification look-back period for the offense is the period applicable to gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor offenses.

 

Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. 15-year disqualification. (a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) less than 15 years have passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the individual has committed a felony-level violation of any of the following offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully obtaining assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts); 393.07, subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud); 609.165 (felon ineligible to possess firearm); 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6902

injury); 609.215 (suicide); 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or fourth degree); repeat offenses under 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.229 (crimes committed for benefit of a gang); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime); 609.24 (simple robbery); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.267 (assault of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2671 (assault of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.268 (injury or death of an unborn child in the commission of a crime); 609.27 (coercion); 609.275 (attempt to coerce); repeat offenses under 609.3451 (criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.498, subdivision 1 or 1b (aggravated first degree or first degree tampering with a witness); 609.52 (theft); 609.521 (possession of shoplifting gear); 609.525 (bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53 (receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks); 609.562 (arson in the second degree); 609.563 (arson in the third degree); 609.582 (burglary); 609.59 (possession of burglary tools); 609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.625 (aggravated forgery); 609.63 (forgery); 609.631 (check forgery; offering a forged check); 609.635 (obtaining signature by false pretense); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.67 (machine guns and short-barreled shotguns); 609.687 (adulteration); 609.71 (riot); 609.713 (terroristic threats); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821 (financial transaction card fraud); repeat offenses under 617.23 (indecent exposure; penalties), not involving a minor; repeat offenses under 617.241 (obscene materials and performances; distribution and exhibition prohibited; penalty); 624.713 (certain persons not to possess firearms); chapter 152 (drugs; controlled substance); or a felony-level conviction involving alcohol or drug use.

 

(b) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.

 

(c) For foster care and family child care an individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has passed since the individual's voluntary termination of the individual's parental rights under section 260C.301, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), or 260C.301, subdivision 3.

 

(d) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the elements of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).

 

(e) If the individual studied is convicted commits one of one of the felonies offenses listed in paragraph (a), but the sentence or level of offense is a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor disposition, the individual is disqualified but the disqualification lookback period for the conviction offense is the period applicable to the gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor disposition.

 

(f) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court order. When a disqualification is based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an admission in court. When a disqualification is based on a preponderance of evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the incident, whichever occurs last.

 

Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.15, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Ten-year disqualification. (a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) less than ten years have passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the individual has committed a gross misdemeanor-level violation of any of the following offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully obtaining assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts); 393.07, subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud); 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.221 or 609.222 (assault


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6903

in the first or second degree); 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or fourth degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.224, subdivision 2, paragraph (c) (assault in the fifth degree by a caregiver against a vulnerable adult); 609.2242 and 609.2243 (domestic assault); 609.23 (mistreatment of persons confined); 609.231 (mistreatment of residents or patients); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.233 (criminal neglect of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report maltreatment of a vulnerable adult); 609.265 (abduction); 609.275 (attempt to coerce); 609.324, subdivision 1a (other prohibited acts; minor engaged in prostitution); 609.33 (disorderly house); 609.3451 (criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree); 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.52 (theft); 609.525 (bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53 (receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks); 609.582 (burglary); 609.59 (possession of burglary tools); 609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.631 (check forgery; offering a forged check); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.71 (riot); 609.72, subdivision 3 (disorderly conduct against a vulnerable adult); repeat offenses under 609.746 (interference with privacy); 609.749, subdivision 2 (harassment; stalking); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821 (financial transaction card fraud); repeat offenses under 617.23 (indecent exposure), not involving a minor; 617.241 (obscene materials and performances); 617.243 (indecent literature, distribution); 617.293 (harmful materials; dissemination and display to minors prohibited); or violation of an order for protection under section 518B.01, subdivision 14.

 

(b) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than ten years has passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.

 

(c) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than ten years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).

 

(d) If the defendant is convicted of one of the gross misdemeanors individual studied commits one of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), but the sentence or level of offense is a misdemeanor disposition, the individual is disqualified but the disqualification lookback period for the conviction offense is the period applicable to misdemeanors.

 

(e) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court order. When a disqualification is based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an admission in court. When a disqualification is based on a preponderance of evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the incident, whichever occurs last.

 

Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.15, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. Seven-year disqualification. (a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) less than seven years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the individual has committed a misdemeanor-level violation of any of the following offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully obtaining assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts); 393.07, subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud); 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.221 (assault in the first degree); 609.222 (assault in the second degree); 609.223 (assault in the third degree); 609.2231 (assault in the fourth degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.2242 (domestic assault); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report maltreatment of a vulnerable adult); 609.2672 (assault of an unborn child in the third degree); 609.27 (coercion); violation of an order for protection under 609.3232 (protective order authorized; procedures; penalties); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.52 (theft); 609.525 (bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53 (receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks);


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6904

609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.665 (spring guns); 609.746 (interference with privacy); 609.79 (obscene or harassing telephone calls); 609.795 (letter, telegram, or package; opening; harassment); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821 (financial transaction card fraud); 617.23 (indecent exposure; penalties), not involving a minor; 617.293 (harmful materials; dissemination and display to minors prohibited); or violation of an order for protection under section 518B.01 (Domestic Abuse Act).

 

(b) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has passed since a determination or disposition of the individual's:

 

(1) failure to make required reports under section 626.556, subdivision 3, or 626.557, subdivision 3, for incidents in which: (i) the final disposition under section 626.556 or 626.557 was substantiated maltreatment, and (ii) the maltreatment was recurring or serious; or

 

(2) substantiated serious or recurring maltreatment of a minor under section 626.556, a vulnerable adult under section 626.557, or serious or recurring maltreatment in any other state, the elements of which are substantially similar to the elements of maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557 for which: (i) there is a preponderance of evidence that the maltreatment occurred, and (ii) the subject was responsible for the maltreatment.

 

(c) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraphs (a) and (b), as each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.

 

(d) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraphs (a) and (b).

 

(e) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court order. When a disqualification is based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an admission in court. When a disqualification is based on a preponderance of evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the incident, whichever occurs last.

 

(f) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has passed since the individual was disqualified under section 256.98, subdivision 8.

 

Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.16, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Determining immediate risk of harm. (a) If the commissioner determines that the individual studied has a disqualifying characteristic, the commissioner shall review the information immediately available and make a determination as to the subject's immediate risk of harm to persons served by the program where the individual studied will have direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services.

 

(b) The commissioner shall consider all relevant information available, including the following factors in determining the immediate risk of harm:

 

(1) the recency of the disqualifying characteristic;

 

(2) the recency of discharge from probation for the crimes;

 

(3) the number of disqualifying characteristics;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6905

(4) the intrusiveness or violence of the disqualifying characteristic;

 

(5) the vulnerability of the victim involved in the disqualifying characteristic;

 

(6) the similarity of the victim to the persons served by the program where the individual studied will have direct contact; and

 

(7) whether the individual has a disqualification from a previous background study that has not been set aside.; and

 

(8) if the individual has a disqualification which may not be set aside because it is a permanent bar under section 245C.24, subdivision 1, the commissioner may order the immediate removal of the individual from any position allowing direct contact with, or access to, persons receiving services from the program.

 

(c) This section does not apply when the subject of a background study is regulated by a health-related licensing board as defined in chapter 214, and the subject is determined to be responsible for substantiated maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557.

 

(d) If the commissioner has reason to believe, based on arrest information or an active maltreatment investigation, that an individual poses an imminent risk of harm to persons receiving services, the commissioner may order that the person be continuously supervised or immediately removed pending the conclusion of the maltreatment investigation or criminal proceedings.

 

Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.17, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Disqualification notice sent to subject. (a) If the information in the study indicates the individual is disqualified from direct contact with, or from access to, persons served by the program, the commissioner shall disclose to the individual studied:

 

(1) the information causing disqualification;

 

(2) instructions on how to request a reconsideration of the disqualification;

 

(3) an explanation of any restrictions on the commissioner's discretion to set aside the disqualification under section 245C.24, when applicable to the individual;

 

(4) a statement indicating that if the individual's disqualification is set aside or the facility is granted a variance under section 245C.30, the individual's identity and the reason for the individual's disqualification will become public data under section 245C.22, subdivision 7, when applicable to the individual; and

 

(5) the commissioner's determination of the individual's immediate risk of harm under section 245C.16.

 

(b) If the commissioner determines under section 245C.16 that an individual poses an imminent risk of harm to persons served by the program where the individual will have direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services, the commissioner's notice must include an explanation of the basis of this determination.

 

(c) If the commissioner determines under section 245C.16 that an individual studied does not pose a risk of harm that requires immediate removal, the individual shall be informed of the conditions under which the agency that initiated the background study may allow the individual to provide have direct contact services with, or access to, people receiving services, as provided under subdivision 3.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6906

Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.17, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Disqualification notification. (a) The commissioner shall notify an applicant, license holder, or other entity as provided in this chapter who is not the subject of the study:

 

(1) that the commissioner has found information that disqualifies the individual studied from being in a position allowing direct contact with, or from access to, persons people served by the program; and

 

(2) the commissioner's determination of the individual's risk of harm under section 245C.16.

 

(b) If the commissioner determines under section 245C.16 that an individual studied poses an imminent risk of harm to persons served by the program where the individual studied will have direct contact with, or access to, people served by the program, the commissioner shall order the license holder to immediately remove the individual studied from any position allowing direct contact with, or access to, people served by the program.

 

(c) If the commissioner determines under section 245C.16 that an individual studied poses a risk of harm that requires continuous, direct supervision, the commissioner shall order the applicant, license holder, or other entities as provided in this chapter to:

 

(1) immediately remove the individual studied from any position allowing direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services; or

 

(2) before allowing the disqualified individual to provide be in a position allowing direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services, the applicant, license holder, or other entity, as provided in this chapter, must:

 

(i) obtain from the disqualified individual a copy of the individual's notice of disqualification from the commissioner that explains the reason for disqualification;

 

(ii) ensure that the individual studied is under continuous, direct supervision when providing in a position allowing direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services during the period in which the individual may request a reconsideration of the disqualification under section 245C.21; and

 

(iii) ensure that the disqualified individual requests reconsideration within 30 days of receipt of the notice of disqualification.

 

(d) If the commissioner determines under section 245C.16 that an individual studied does not pose a risk of harm that requires continuous, direct supervision, the commissioner shall order the applicant, license holder, or other entities as provided in this chapter to:

 

(1) immediately remove the individual studied from any position allowing direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services; or

 

(2) before allowing the disqualified individual to provide be in any position allowing direct contact with, or access to, people receiving services, the applicant, license holder, or other entity as provided in this chapter must:

 

(i) obtain from the disqualified individual a copy of the individual's notice of disqualification from the commissioner that explains the reason for disqualification; and

 

(ii) ensure that the disqualified individual requests reconsideration within 15 days of receipt of the notice of disqualification.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6907

(e) The commissioner shall not notify the applicant, license holder, or other entity as provided in this chapter of the information contained in the subject's background study unless:

 

(1) the basis for the disqualification is failure to cooperate with the background study or substantiated maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557;

 

(2) the Data Practices Act under chapter 13 provides for release of the information; or

 

(3) the individual studied authorizes the release of the information.

 

Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.21, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Time frame for requesting reconsideration. (a) When the commissioner sends an individual a notice of disqualification based on a finding under section 245C.16, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (2), the disqualified individual must submit the request for a reconsideration within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If mailed, the request for reconsideration must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If a request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within 30 calendar days after the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. Upon showing that the information under subdivision 3 cannot be obtained within 30 days, the disqualified individual may request additional time, not to exceed 30 days, to obtain the information.

 

(b) When the commissioner sends an individual a notice of disqualification based on a finding under section 245C.16, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (3), the disqualified individual must submit the request for reconsideration within 15 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If mailed, the request for reconsideration must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within 15 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If a request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within 15 calendar days after the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.

 

(c) An individual who was determined to have maltreated a child under section 626.556 or a vulnerable adult under section 626.557, and who is disqualified on the basis of serious or recurring maltreatment, may request a reconsideration of both the maltreatment and the disqualification determinations. The request must be submitted within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If mailed, the request for reconsideration must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If a request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the commissioner within 30 calendar days after the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.

 

(d) Except for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment determination under sections 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of a disqualification under section 245C.22, shall not be conducted when:

 

(1) a denial of a license under section 245A.05, or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder based on serious or recurring maltreatment;

 

(2) the denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination or disqualification; and


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6908

(3) the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction. In such cases, a fair hearing under section 256.045 must not be conducted under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d. Under section 245A.08, subdivision 2a, the scope of the consolidated contested case hearing must include the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction.

 

Notwithstanding clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall be conducted under section 626.556, subdivision 10i, and section 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted under section 245C.22. In such cases, a fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.21, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Information Disqualified individuals must provide when requesting reconsideration; information for reconsideration. (a) The disqualified individual requesting reconsideration must submit information showing that:

 

(1) the information the commissioner relied upon in determining the underlying conduct that gave rise to the disqualification is incorrect;

 

(2) for maltreatment, the information the commissioner relied upon in determining that maltreatment was serious or recurring is incorrect; or

 

(3) the subject of the study does not pose a risk of harm to any person served by the applicant, license holder, or other entities as provided in this chapter, by addressing the information required under section 245C.22, subdivision 4.

 

(b) In order to determine the individual's risk of harm, the commissioner may require additional information from the disqualified individual as part of the reconsideration process. If the individual fails to provide the required information, the commissioner may deny the individual's request.

 

Sec. 43. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.22, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. Risk of harm; set aside. (a) The commissioner may set aside the disqualification if the commissioner finds that the individual has submitted sufficient information to demonstrate that the individual does not pose a risk of harm to any person served by the applicant, license holder, or other entities as provided in this chapter.

 

(b) In determining whether the individual has met the burden of proof by demonstrating the individual does not pose a risk of harm, the commissioner shall consider:

 

(1) the nature, severity, and consequences of the event or events that led to the disqualification;

 

(2) whether there is more than one disqualifying event;

 

(3) the age and vulnerability of the victim at the time of the event;

 

(4) the harm suffered by the victim;

 

(5) vulnerability of persons served by the program;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6909

(6) the similarity between the victim and persons served by the program;

 

(6) (7) the time elapsed without a repeat of the same or similar event;

 

(7) (8) documentation of successful completion by the individual studied of training or rehabilitation pertinent to the event; and

 

(8) (9) any other information relevant to reconsideration.

 

(c) If the individual requested reconsideration on the basis that the information relied upon to disqualify the individual was incorrect or inaccurate and the commissioner determines that the information relied upon to disqualify the individual is correct, the commissioner must also determine if the individual poses a risk of harm to persons receiving services in accordance with paragraph (b).

 

Sec. 44. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.22, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5. Scope of set aside. If the commissioner sets aside a disqualification under this section, the disqualified individual remains disqualified, but may hold a license and have direct contact with or access to persons receiving services. The commissioner's set aside of a disqualification is limited solely to the licensed program, applicant, or agency specified in the set aside notice under section 245C.23, unless otherwise specified in the notice. For personal care provider organizations, the commissioner's set-aside may further be limited to a specific individual who is receiving services.

 

Sec. 45. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.24, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Ten-year bar to set aside disqualification. (a) The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an individual in connection with a license to provide family child care for children, foster care for children in the provider's home, or foster care or day care services for adults in the provider's home if: (1) less than ten years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; or (2) when disqualified based on a preponderance of evidence determination under section 245A.14 245C.14, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), or an admission under section 245A.14 245C.14, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1), and less than ten years has passed since the individual committed the act or admitted to committing the act, whichever is later; and (3) the individual has committed a violation of any of the following offenses: sections 609.165 (felon ineligible to possess firearm); criminal vehicular homicide under 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.215 (aiding suicide or aiding attempted suicide); felony violations under 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or fourth degree); 609.229 (crimes committed for benefit of a gang); 609.713 (terroristic threats); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure or to facilitate crime); 609.24 (simple robbery); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.562 (arson in the second degree); 609.71 (riot); 609.498, subdivision 1 or 1b (aggravated first degree or first degree tampering with a witness); burglary in the first or second degree under 609.582 (burglary); 609.66 (dangerous weapon); 609.665 (spring guns); 609.67 (machine guns and short-barreled shotguns); 609.749, subdivision 2 (gross misdemeanor harassment; stalking); 152.021 or 152.022 (controlled substance crime in the first or second degree); 152.023, subdivision 1, clause (3) or (4) or subdivision 2, clause (4) (controlled substance crime in the third degree); 152.024, subdivision 1, clause (2), (3), or (4) (controlled substance crime in the fourth degree); 609.224, subdivision 2, paragraph (c) (fifth-degree assault by a caregiver against a vulnerable adult); 609.23 (mistreatment of persons confined); 609.231 (mistreatment of residents or patients); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.233 (criminal neglect of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report); 609.265 (abduction); 609.2664 to 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first or second degree); 609.267 to 609.2672 (assault of an unborn child in the first, second, or third degree); 609.268 (injury or death of an unborn child in the commission of a crime); repeat offenses under 617.23 (indecent exposure); 617.293


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6910

(disseminating or displaying harmful material to minors); a felony-level conviction involving alcohol or drug use, a gross misdemeanor offense under 609.324, subdivision 1 (other prohibited acts); a gross misdemeanor offense under 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); a gross misdemeanor offense under 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); or 609.72, subdivision 3 (disorderly conduct against a vulnerable adult); or 624.713 (certain persons not to possess firearms).

 

(b) The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an individual if less than ten years have passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a) as each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.

 

(c) The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an individual if less than ten years have passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).

 

Sec. 46. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.27, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Fair hearing when disqualification is not set aside. (a) If the commissioner does not set aside a disqualification of an individual under section 245C.22 who is disqualified on the basis of a preponderance of evidence that the individual committed an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15; for a determination under section 626.556 or 626.557 of substantiated maltreatment that was serious or recurring under section 245C.15; or for failure to make required reports under section 626.556, subdivision 3; or 626.557, subdivision 3, pursuant to section 245C.15, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), clause (1), the individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045, unless the disqualification is deemed conclusive under section 245C.29.

 

(b) The fair hearing is the only administrative appeal of the final agency determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual. The disqualified individual does not have the right to challenge the accuracy and completeness of data under section 13.04.

 

(c) Except as provided under paragraph (e), if the individual was disqualified based on a conviction or admission to any crimes listed in section 245C.15, subdivisions 1 to 4, or for a disqualification under section 256.98, subdivision 8, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22 is the final agency determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual and is not subject to a hearing under section 256.045. If the individual was disqualified based on a judicial determination, that determination is treated the same as a conviction for purposes of appeal.

 

(d) This subdivision does not apply to a public employee's appeal of a disqualification under section 245C.28, subdivision 3.

 

(e) Notwithstanding paragraph (c), if the commissioner does not set aside a disqualification of an individual who was disqualified based on both a preponderance of evidence and a conviction or admission, the individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045, unless the disqualifications are deemed conclusive under section 245C.29. The scope of the hearing conducted under section 256.045 with regard to the disqualification based on a conviction or admission shall be limited solely to whether the individual poses a risk of harm, according to section 256.045, subdivision 3b. In this case, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22 is not the final agency decision for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6911

Sec. 47. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.28, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. License holder. (a) If a maltreatment determination or a disqualification for which reconsideration was requested and which was not set aside is the basis for a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, the license holder has the right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. The license holder must submit the appeal under section 245A.05 or 245A.07, subdivision 3.

 

(b) The license holder must submit the appeal in accordance with section 245A.05 or 245A.07, subdivision 3. As provided under section 245A.08, subdivision 2a, if the denial of a license or licensing sanction is based on a disqualification for which reconsideration was requested and was not set-aside, the scope of the consolidated contested case hearing must include:

 

(1) the disqualification, to the extent the license holder otherwise has a hearing right on the disqualification under this chapter; and

 

(2) the licensing sanction or denial of a license.

 

(c) If the disqualification was based on a determination of substantiated serious or recurring maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557, the appeal must be submitted in accordance with sections 245A.07, subdivision 3, and 626.556, subdivision 10i, or 626.557, subdivision 9d. As provided for under section 245A.08, subdivision 2a, if the denial of a license or licensing sanction is based on a determination of maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557, or a disqualification for serious or recurring maltreatment which was not set-aside, the scope of the contested case hearing must include:

 

(1) the maltreatment determination, if the maltreatment is not conclusive under section 245C.29;

 

(2) the disqualification, if the disqualification is not conclusive under section 245C.29; and

 

(3) the licensing sanction or denial of a license. In such cases, a fair hearing must not be conducted under section 256.045. If the disqualification was based on a determination of substantiated serious or recurring maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557, the appeal must be submitted under sections 245A.07, subdivision 3, and 626.556, subdivision 10i, or 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

(d) Except for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment determination under sections 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of a disqualification under section 245C.22, must not be conducted when:

 

(1) a denial of a license under section 245A.05, or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder based on serious or recurring maltreatment;

 

(2) the denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination or disqualification; and

 

(3) the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction. In such cases a fair hearing under section 256.045 must not be conducted under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d. Under section 245A.08, subdivision 2a, the scope of the consolidated contested case hearing must include the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6912

Notwithstanding clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall be conducted under section 626.556, subdivision 10i, and section 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted under section 245C.22. In such cases, a fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

Sec. 48. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 245C.301, is amended to read:

 

245C.301 NOTIFICATION OF SET-ASIDE OR VARIANCE.

 

(a) Except as provided under paragraph paragraphs (b) and (c), if required by the commissioner, family child care providers and child care centers must provide a written notification to parents considering enrollment of a child or parents of a child attending the family child care or child care center if the program employs or has living in the home any individual who is the subject of either a set-aside or variance.

 

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), family child care license holders are not required to disclose that the program has an individual living in the home who is the subject of a set-aside or variance if:

 

(1) the household member resides in the residence where the family child care is provided;

 

(2) the subject of the set-aside or variance is under the age of 18 years; and

 

(3) the set-aside or variance relates to a disqualification under section 245C.15, subdivision 4, for a misdemeanor-level theft crime as defined in section 609.52.

 

(c) The notice specified in paragraph (a) is not required when the period of disqualification in section 245C.15, subdivisions 2 to 4, has been exceeded.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.

 

Sec. 49. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256B.0919, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 4. County certification; licensed providers; related individual; developmentally disabled. (a) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, a county may certify an adult foster care license holder to provide foster care services to an individual with a developmental disability, who is related to the provider, if the following conditions are met:

 

(1) the individual is 18 years of age or older;

 

(2) the individual's service plan meets the standards of section 256B.092 and specifies any special conditions necessary to prevent a conflict of interest for the provider;

 

(3) the provider is not the legal guardian or conservator of the related individual;

 

(4) the provider maintains a license under Minnesota Rules, parts 9555.5105 to 9555.6265, to serve unrelated foster care recipients;

 

(5) the provider maintains a license under chapter 245B; and


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6913

(6) the county certifies the provider meets the adult foster care provider standards established in Minnesota Rules, parts 9555.5105 to 9555.6265, for services provided to the related individual.

 

(b) The county shall complete an annual certification review to ensure compliance with paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (6).

 

(c) Notwithstanding section 256I.04, subdivision 2a, clause (2), the adult foster care provider certified by the county under this subdivision may be reimbursed for room and board costs through the group residential housing program.

 

Sec. 50. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256B.092, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 4d. Medicaid reimbursement; licensed provider; related individuals. The commissioner shall seek a federal amendment to the home and community-based services waiver for individuals with developmental disabilities, to allow Medicaid reimbursement for the provision of supported living services to a related individual when the following conditions have been met:

 

(1) the individual is 18 years of age or older;

 

(2) the provider is certified initially and annually thereafter, by the county, as meeting the provider standards established in chapter 245B and the federal waiver plan;

 

(3) the provider has been certified by the county as meeting the adult foster care provider standards established in Minnesota Rules, parts 9555.5105 to 9555.6265;

 

(4) the provider is not the legal guardian or conservator of the related individual; and

 

(5) the individual's service plan meets the standards of section 256B.092 and specifies any special conditions necessary to prevent a conflict of interest for the provider.

 

Sec. 51. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 270B.14, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Disclosure to commissioner of human services. (a) On the request of the commissioner of human services, the commissioner shall disclose return information regarding taxes imposed by chapter 290, and claims for refunds under chapter 290A, to the extent provided in paragraph (b) and for the purposes set forth in paragraph (c).

 

(b) Data that may be disclosed are limited to data relating to the identity, whereabouts, employment, income, and property of a person owing or alleged to be owing an obligation of child support.

 

(c) The commissioner of human services may request data only for the purposes of carrying out the child support enforcement program and to assist in the location of parents who have, or appear to have, deserted their children. Data received may be used only as set forth in section 256.978.

 

(d) The commissioner shall provide the records and information necessary to administer the supplemental housing allowance to the commissioner of human services.

 

(e) At the request of the commissioner of human services, the commissioner of revenue shall electronically match the Social Security numbers and names of participants in the telephone assistance plan operated under sections 237.69 to 237.711, with those of property tax refund filers, and determine whether each participant's household income is within the eligibility standards for the telephone assistance plan.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6914

(f) The commissioner may provide records and information collected under sections 295.50 to 295.59 to the commissioner of human services for purposes of the Medicaid Voluntary Contribution and Provider-Specific Tax Amendments of 1991, Public Law 102-234. Upon the written agreement by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to maintain the confidentiality of the data, the commissioner may provide records and information collected under sections 295.50 to 295.59 to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services section of the United States Department of Health and Human Services for purposes of meeting federal reporting requirements.

 

(g) The commissioner may provide records and information to the commissioner of human services as necessary to administer the early refund of refundable tax credits.

 

(h) The commissioner may disclose information to the commissioner of human services necessary to verify income for eligibility and premium payment under the MinnesotaCare program, under section 256L.05, subdivision 2.

 

(i) The commissioner may disclose information to the commissioner of human services necessary to verify whether applicants or recipients for the Minnesota family investment program, general assistance, food support, and Minnesota supplemental aid program have claimed refundable tax credits under chapter 290 and the property tax refund under chapter 290A, and the amounts of the credits.

 

(j) The commissioner may disclose information to the commissioner of human services necessary to verify income for purposes of calculating parental contribution amounts under section 252.27, subdivision 2a.

 

Sec. 52. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 626.556, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms have the meanings given them unless the specific content indicates otherwise:

 

(a) "Family assessment" means a comprehensive assessment of child safety, risk of subsequent child maltreatment, and family strengths and needs that is applied to a child maltreatment report that does not allege substantial child endangerment. Family assessment does not include a determination as to whether child maltreatment occurred but does determine the need for services to address the safety of family members and the risk of subsequent maltreatment.

 

(b) "Investigation" means fact gathering related to the current safety of a child and the risk of subsequent maltreatment that determines whether child maltreatment occurred and whether child protective services are needed. An investigation must be used when reports involve substantial child endangerment, and for reports of maltreatment in facilities required to be licensed under chapter 245A or 245B; under sections 144.50 to 144.58 and 241.021; in a school as defined in sections 120A.05, subdivisions 9, 11, and 13, and 124D.10; or in a nonlicensed personal care provider association as defined in sections 256B.04, subdivision 16, and 256B.0625, subdivision 19a.

 

(c) "Substantial child endangerment" means a person responsible for a child's care, a person who has a significant relationship to the child as defined in section 609.341, or a person in a position of authority as defined in section 609.341, who by act or omission commits or attempts to commit an act against a child under their care that constitutes any of the following:

 

(1) egregious harm as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 14;

 

(2) sexual abuse as defined in paragraph (d);

 

(3) abandonment under section 260C.301, subdivision 2;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6915

(4) neglect as defined in paragraph (f), clause (2), that substantially endangers the child's physical or mental health, including a growth delay, which may be referred to as failure to thrive, that has been diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect;

 

(5) murder in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.185, 609.19, or 609.195;

 

(6) manslaughter in the first or second degree under section 609.20 or 609.205;

 

(7) assault in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.221, 609.222, or 609.223;

 

(8) solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution under section 609.322;

 

(9) criminal sexual conduct under sections 609.342 to 609.3451;

 

(10) solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct under section 609.352;

 

(11) malicious punishment or neglect or endangerment of a child under section 609.377 or 609.378;

 

(12) use of a minor in sexual performance under section 617.246; or

 

(13) parental behavior, status, or condition which mandates that the county attorney file a termination of parental rights petition under section 260C.301, subdivision 3, paragraph (a).

 

(d) "Sexual abuse" means the subjection of a child by a person responsible for the child's care, by a person who has a significant relationship to the child, as defined in section 609.341, or by a person in a position of authority, as defined in section 609.341, subdivision 10, to any act which constitutes a violation of section 609.342 (criminal sexual conduct in the first degree), 609.343 (criminal sexual conduct in the second degree), 609.344 (criminal sexual conduct in the third degree), 609.345 (criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree), or 609.3451 (criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree). Sexual abuse also includes any act which involves a minor which constitutes a violation of prostitution offenses under sections 609.321 to 609.324 or 617.246. Sexual abuse includes threatened sexual abuse.

 

(e) "Person responsible for the child's care" means (1) an individual functioning within the family unit and having responsibilities for the care of the child such as a parent, guardian, or other person having similar care responsibilities, or (2) an individual functioning outside the family unit and having responsibilities for the care of the child such as a teacher, school administrator, other school employees or agents, or other lawful custodian of a child having either full-time or short-term care responsibilities including, but not limited to, day care, babysitting whether paid or unpaid, counseling, teaching, and coaching.

 

(f) "Neglect" means:

 

(1) failure by a person responsible for a child's care to supply a child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, health, medical, or other care required for the child's physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so;

 

(2) failure to protect a child from conditions or actions that seriously endanger the child's physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so, including a growth delay, which may be referred to as a failure to thrive, that has been diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6916

(3) failure to provide for necessary supervision or child care arrangements appropriate for a child after considering factors as the child's age, mental ability, physical condition, length of absence, or environment, when the child is unable to care for the child's own basic needs or safety, or the basic needs or safety of another child in their care;

 

(4) failure to ensure that the child is educated as defined in sections 120A.22 and 260C.163, subdivision 11, which does not include a parent's refusal to provide the parent's child with sympathomimetic medications, consistent with section 125A.091, subdivision 5;

 

(5) nothing in this section shall be construed to mean that a child is neglected solely because the child's parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the child's care in good faith selects and depends upon spiritual means or prayer for treatment or care of disease or remedial care of the child in lieu of medical care; except that a parent, guardian, or caretaker, or a person mandated to report pursuant to subdivision 3, has a duty to report if a lack of medical care may cause serious danger to the child's health. This section does not impose upon persons, not otherwise legally responsible for providing a child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, education, or medical care, a duty to provide that care;

 

(6) prenatal exposure to a controlled substance, as defined in section 253B.02, subdivision 2, used by the mother for a nonmedical purpose, as evidenced by withdrawal symptoms in the child at birth, results of a toxicology test performed on the mother at delivery or the child at birth, or medical effects or developmental delays during the child's first year of life that medically indicate prenatal exposure to a controlled substance;

 

(7) "medical neglect" as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 6, clause (5);

 

(8) chronic and severe use of alcohol or a controlled substance by a parent or person responsible for the care of the child that adversely affects the child's basic needs and safety; or

 

(9) emotional harm from a pattern of behavior which contributes to impaired emotional functioning of the child which may be demonstrated by a substantial and observable effect in the child's behavior, emotional response, or cognition that is not within the normal range for the child's age and stage of development, with due regard to the child's culture.

 

(g) "Physical abuse" means any physical injury, mental injury, or threatened injury, inflicted by a person responsible for the child's care on a child other than by accidental means, or any physical or mental injury that cannot reasonably be explained by the child's history of injuries, or any aversive or deprivation procedures, or regulated interventions, that have not been authorized under section 121A.67 or 245.825.

 

Abuse does not include reasonable and moderate physical discipline of a child administered by a parent or legal guardian which does not result in an injury. Abuse does not include the use of reasonable force by a teacher, principal, or school employee as allowed by section 121A.582. Actions which are not reasonable and moderate include, but are not limited to, any of the following that are done in anger or without regard to the safety of the child:

 

(1) throwing, kicking, burning, biting, or cutting a child;

 

(2) striking a child with a closed fist;

 

(3) shaking a child under age three;

 

(4) striking or other actions which result in any nonaccidental injury to a child under 18 months of age;

 

(5) unreasonable interference with a child's breathing;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6917

(6) threatening a child with a weapon, as defined in section 609.02, subdivision 6;

 

(7) striking a child under age one on the face or head;

 

(8) purposely giving a child poison, alcohol, or dangerous, harmful, or controlled substances which were not prescribed for the child by a practitioner, in order to control or punish the child; or other substances that substantially affect the child's behavior, motor coordination, or judgment or that results in sickness or internal injury, or subjects the child to medical procedures that would be unnecessary if the child were not exposed to the substances;

 

(9) unreasonable physical confinement or restraint not permitted under section 609.379, including but not limited to tying, caging, or chaining; or

 

(10) in a school facility or school zone, an act by a person responsible for the child's care that is a violation under section 121A.58.

 

(h) "Report" means any report received by the local welfare agency, police department, county sheriff, or agency responsible for assessing or investigating maltreatment pursuant to this section.

 

(i) "Facility" means:

 

(1) a licensed or unlicensed day care facility, residential facility, agency, hospital, sanitarium, or other facility or institution required to be licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.58, 241.021, or 245A.01 to 245A.16, or chapter 245B;

 

(2) a school as defined in sections 120A.05, subdivisions 9, 11, and 13; and 124D.10; or

 

(3) a nonlicensed personal care provider organization as defined in sections 256B.04, subdivision 16, and 256B.0625, subdivision 19a.

 

(j) "Operator" means an operator or agency as defined in section 245A.02.

 

(k) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of human services.

 

(l) "Practice of social services," for the purposes of subdivision 3, includes but is not limited to employee assistance counseling and the provision of guardian ad litem and parenting time expeditor services.

 

(m) "Mental injury" means an injury to the psychological capacity or emotional stability of a child as evidenced by an observable or substantial impairment in the child's ability to function within a normal range of performance and behavior with due regard to the child's culture.

 

(n) "Threatened injury" means a statement, overt act, condition, or status that represents a substantial risk of physical or sexual abuse or mental injury. Threatened injury includes, but is not limited to, exposing a child to a person responsible for the child's care, as defined in paragraph (e), clause (1), who has:

 

(1) subjected a child to, or failed to protect a child from, an overt act or condition that constitutes egregious harm, as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 14, or a similar law of another jurisdiction;

 

(2) been found to be palpably unfit under section 260C.301, paragraph (b), clause (4), or a similar law of another jurisdiction;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6918

(3) committed an act that has resulted in an involuntary termination of parental rights under section 260C.301, or a similar law of another jurisdiction; or

 

(4) committed an act that has resulted in the involuntary transfer of permanent legal and physical custody of a child to a relative under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, paragraph (d), clause (1), or a similar law of another jurisdiction.

 

(o) Persons who conduct assessments or investigations under this section shall take into account accepted child-rearing practices of the culture in which a child participates and accepted teacher discipline practices, which are not injurious to the child's health, welfare, and safety.

 

(p) "Accidental" means a sudden, not reasonably foreseeable, and unexpected occurrence or event which:

 

(1) is not likely to occur and could not have been prevented by exercise of due care; and

 

(2) if occurring while a child is receiving services from a facility, happens when the facility and the employee or person providing services in the facility are in compliance with the laws and rules relevant to the occurrence of event.

 

Sec. 53. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 626.556, subdivision 10e, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 10e. Determinations. (a) The local welfare agency shall conclude the family assessment or the investigation within 45 days of the receipt of a report. The conclusion of the assessment or investigation may be extended to permit the completion of a criminal investigation or the receipt of expert information requested within 45 days of the receipt of the report.

 

(b) After conducting a family assessment, the local welfare agency shall determine whether services are needed to address the safety of the child and other family members and the risk of subsequent maltreatment.

 

(c) After conducting an investigation, the local welfare agency shall make two determinations: first, whether maltreatment has occurred; and second, whether child protective services are needed.

 

(d) If the commissioner of education conducts an assessment or investigation, the commissioner shall determine whether maltreatment occurred and what corrective or protective action was taken by the school facility. If a determination is made that maltreatment has occurred, the commissioner shall report to the employer, the school board, and any appropriate licensing entity the determination that maltreatment occurred and what corrective or protective action was taken by the school facility. In all other cases, the commissioner shall inform the school board or employer that a report was received, the subject of the report, the date of the initial report, the category of maltreatment alleged as defined in paragraph (f), the fact that maltreatment was not determined, and a summary of the specific reasons for the determination.

 

(e) When maltreatment is determined in an investigation involving a facility, the investigating agency shall also determine whether the facility or individual was responsible, or whether both the facility and the individual were responsible for the maltreatment using the mitigating factors in paragraph (i). Determinations under this subdivision must be made based on a preponderance of the evidence and are private data on individuals or nonpublic data as maintained by the commissioner of education.

 

(f) For the purposes of this subdivision, "maltreatment" means any of the following acts or omissions:

 

(1) physical abuse as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (g);


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6919

(2) neglect as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (f);

 

(3) sexual abuse as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (d);

 

(4) mental injury as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (m); or

 

(5) maltreatment of a child in a facility as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (i).

 

(g) For the purposes of this subdivision, a determination that child protective services are needed means that the local welfare agency has documented conditions during the assessment or investigation sufficient to cause a child protection worker, as defined in section 626.559, subdivision 1, to conclude that a child is at significant risk of maltreatment if protective intervention is not provided and that the individuals responsible for the child's care have not taken or are not likely to take actions to protect the child from maltreatment or risk of maltreatment.

 

(h) This subdivision does not mean that maltreatment has occurred solely because the child's parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the child's care in good faith selects and depends upon spiritual means or prayer for treatment or care of disease or remedial care of the child, in lieu of medical care. However, if lack of medical care may result in serious danger to the child's health, the local welfare agency may ensure that necessary medical services are provided to the child.

 

(i) When determining whether the facility or individual is the responsible party, or whether both the facility and the individual are responsible for determined maltreatment in a facility, the investigating agency shall consider at least the following mitigating factors:

 

(1) whether the actions of the facility or the individual caregivers were according to, and followed the terms of, an erroneous physician order, prescription, individual care plan, or directive; however, this is not a mitigating factor when the facility or caregiver was responsible for the issuance of the erroneous order, prescription, individual care plan, or directive or knew or should have known of the errors and took no reasonable measures to correct the defect before administering care;

 

(2) comparative responsibility between the facility, other caregivers, and requirements placed upon an employee, including the facility's compliance with related regulatory standards and the adequacy of facility policies and procedures, facility training, an individual's participation in the training, the caregiver's supervision, and facility staffing levels and the scope of the individual employee's authority and discretion; and

 

(3) whether the facility or individual followed professional standards in exercising professional judgment.

 

(j) Individual counties may implement more detailed definitions or criteria that indicate which allegations to investigate, as long as a county's policies are consistent with the definitions in the statutes and rules and are approved by the county board. Each local welfare agency shall periodically inform mandated reporters under subdivision 3 who work in the county of the definitions of maltreatment in the statutes and rules and any additional definitions or criteria that have been approved by the county board.

 

Sec. 54. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 626.556, subdivision 10i, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 10i. Administrative reconsideration of final determination of maltreatment and disqualification based on serious or recurring maltreatment; review panel. (a) Administrative reconsideration is not applicable in family assessments since no determination concerning maltreatment is made. For investigations, except as provided under paragraph (e), an individual or facility that the commissioner of human services, a local social service agency, or the commissioner of education determines has maltreated a child, an interested person acting on behalf of the child, regardless of the determination, who contests the investigating agency's final determination


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6920

regarding maltreatment, may request the investigating agency to reconsider its final determination regarding maltreatment. The request for reconsideration must be submitted in writing to the investigating agency within 15 calendar days after receipt of notice of the final determination regarding maltreatment or, if the request is made by an interested person who is not entitled to notice, within 15 days after receipt of the notice by the parent or guardian of the child. If mailed, the request for reconsideration must be postmarked and sent to the investigating agency within 15 calendar days of the individual's or facility's receipt of the final determination. If the request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the investigating agency within 15 calendar days after the individual's or facility's receipt of the final determination. Effective January 1, 2002, an individual who was determined to have maltreated a child under this section and who was disqualified on the basis of serious or recurring maltreatment under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, may request reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification. The request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification must be submitted within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification under sections 245C.16 and 245C.17. If mailed, the request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification must be postmarked and sent to the investigating agency within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the maltreatment determination and notice of disqualification. If the request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the investigating agency within 30 calendar days after the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.

 

(b) Except as provided under paragraphs (e) and (f), if the investigating agency denies the request or fails to act upon the request within 15 working days after receiving the request for reconsideration, the person or facility entitled to a fair hearing under section 256.045 may submit to the commissioner of human services or the commissioner of education a written request for a hearing under that section. Section 256.045 also governs hearings requested to contest a final determination of the commissioner of education. For reports involving maltreatment of a child in a facility, an interested person acting on behalf of the child may request a review by the Child Maltreatment Review Panel under section 256.022 if the investigating agency denies the request or fails to act upon the request or if the interested person contests a reconsidered determination. The investigating agency shall notify persons who request reconsideration of their rights under this paragraph. The request must be submitted in writing to the review panel and a copy sent to the investigating agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice of a denial of a request for reconsideration or of a reconsidered determination. The request must specifically identify the aspects of the agency determination with which the person is dissatisfied.

 

(c) If, as a result of a reconsideration or review, the investigating agency changes the final determination of maltreatment, that agency shall notify the parties specified in subdivisions 10b, 10d, and 10f.

 

(d) Except as provided under paragraph (f), if an individual or facility contests the investigating agency's final determination regarding maltreatment by requesting a fair hearing under section 256.045, the commissioner of human services shall assure that the hearing is conducted and a decision is reached within 90 days of receipt of the request for a hearing. The time for action on the decision may be extended for as many days as the hearing is postponed or the record is held open for the benefit of either party.

 

(e) Effective January 1, 2002, if an individual was disqualified under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, on the basis of a determination of maltreatment, which was serious or recurring, and the individual has requested reconsideration of the maltreatment determination under paragraph (a) and requested reconsideration of the disqualification under sections 245C.21 to 245C.27, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be consolidated into a single reconsideration. If reconsideration of the maltreatment determination is denied or the disqualification is not set aside under sections 245C.21 to 245C.27, the individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045. If an individual requests a fair hearing on the maltreatment determination and the disqualification, the scope of the fair hearing shall include both the maltreatment determination and the disqualification.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6921

(f) Effective January 1, 2002, if a maltreatment determination or a disqualification based on serious or recurring maltreatment is the basis for a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, the license holder has the right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. As provided for under section 245A.08, subdivision 2a, the scope of the contested case hearing shall include the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and licensing sanction or denial of a license. In such cases, a fair hearing regarding the maltreatment determination and disqualification shall not be conducted under paragraph (b). When a fine is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment and the fine is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination, if the license holder appeals the maltreatment and fine, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall not be conducted under this section section 256.045. Except for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment determination as provided under this subdivision, and reconsideration of a disqualification as provided under section 245C.22, shall also not be conducted when:

 

(1) a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder based on serious or recurring maltreatment;

 

(2) the denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination or disqualification; and

 

(3) the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction.

 

Notwithstanding clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall be conducted under section 626.556, subdivision 10i, and section 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted under section 245C.22. In such cases, a fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

If the disqualified subject is an individual other than the license holder and upon whom a background study must be conducted under chapter 245C, the hearings of all parties may be consolidated into a single contested case hearing upon consent of all parties and the administrative law judge.

 

(g) For purposes of this subdivision, "interested person acting on behalf of the child" means a parent or legal guardian; stepparent; grandparent; guardian ad litem; adult stepbrother, stepsister, or sibling; or adult aunt or uncle; unless the person has been determined to be the perpetrator of the maltreatment.

 

Sec. 55. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 626.557, subdivision 9c, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 9c. Lead agency; notifications, dispositions, and determinations. (a) Upon request of the reporter, the lead agency shall notify the reporter that it has received the report, and provide information on the initial disposition of the report within five business days of receipt of the report, provided that the notification will not endanger the vulnerable adult or hamper the investigation.

 

(b) Upon conclusion of every investigation it conducts, the lead agency shall make a final disposition as defined in section 626.5572, subdivision 8.

 

(c) When determining whether the facility or individual is the responsible party for substantiated maltreatment or whether both the facility and the individual are responsible for substantiated maltreatment, the lead agency shall consider at least the following mitigating factors:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6922

(1) whether the actions of the facility or the individual caregivers were in accordance with, and followed the terms of, an erroneous physician order, prescription, resident care plan, or directive. This is not a mitigating factor when the facility or caregiver is responsible for the issuance of the erroneous order, prescription, plan, or directive or knows or should have known of the errors and took no reasonable measures to correct the defect before administering care;

 

(2) the comparative responsibility between the facility, other caregivers, and requirements placed upon the employee, including but not limited to, the facility's compliance with related regulatory standards and factors such as the adequacy of facility policies and procedures, the adequacy of facility training, the adequacy of an individual's participation in the training, the adequacy of caregiver supervision, the adequacy of facility staffing levels, and a consideration of the scope of the individual employee's authority; and

 

(3) whether the facility or individual followed professional standards in exercising professional judgment.

 

(d) The lead agency shall complete its final disposition within 60 calendar days. If the lead agency is unable to complete its final disposition within 60 calendar days, the lead agency shall notify the following persons provided that the notification will not endanger the vulnerable adult or hamper the investigation: (1) the vulnerable adult or the vulnerable adult's legal guardian, when known, if the lead agency knows them to be aware of the investigation and (2) the facility, where applicable. The notice shall contain the reason for the delay and the projected completion date. If the lead agency is unable to complete its final disposition by a subsequent projected completion date, the lead agency shall again notify the vulnerable adult or the vulnerable adult's legal guardian, when known if the lead agency knows them to be aware of the investigation, and the facility, where applicable, of the reason for the delay and the revised projected completion date provided that the notification will not endanger the vulnerable adult or hamper the investigation. A lead agency's inability to complete the final disposition within 60 calendar days or by any projected completion date does not invalidate the final disposition.

 

(e) Within ten calendar days of completing the final disposition, the lead agency shall provide a copy of the public investigation memorandum under subdivision 12b, paragraph (b), clause (1), when required to be completed under this section, to the following persons: (1) the vulnerable adult, or the vulnerable adult's legal guardian, if known unless the lead agency knows that the notification would endanger the well-being of the vulnerable adult; (2) the reporter, if the reporter requested notification when making the report, provided this notification would not endanger the well-being of the vulnerable adult; (3) the alleged perpetrator, if known; (4) the facility; and (5) the ombudsman for older Minnesotans, or the ombudsman for mental health and developmental disabilities, as appropriate.

 

(f) The lead agency shall notify the vulnerable adult who is the subject of the report or the vulnerable adult's legal guardian, if known, and any person or facility determined to have maltreated a vulnerable adult, of their appeal or review rights under this section or section 256.021.

 

(g) The lead agency shall routinely provide investigation memoranda for substantiated reports to the appropriate licensing boards. These reports must include the names of substantiated perpetrators. The lead agency may not provide investigative memoranda for inconclusive or false reports to the appropriate licensing boards unless the lead agency's investigation gives reason to believe that there may have been a violation of the applicable professional practice laws. If the investigation memorandum is provided to a licensing board, the subject of the investigation memorandum shall be notified and receive a summary of the investigative findings.

 

(h) In order to avoid duplication, licensing boards shall consider the findings of the lead agency in their investigations if they choose to investigate. This does not preclude licensing boards from considering other information.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6923

(i) The lead agency must provide to the commissioner of human services its final dispositions, including the names of all substantiated perpetrators. The commissioner of human services shall establish records to retain the names of substantiated perpetrators.

 

Sec. 56. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 626.557, subdivision 9d, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 9d. Administrative reconsideration of final disposition of maltreatment and disqualification based on serious or recurring maltreatment; review panel. (a) Except as provided under paragraph (e), any individual or facility which a lead agency determines has maltreated a vulnerable adult, or the vulnerable adult or an interested person acting on behalf of the vulnerable adult, regardless of the lead agency's determination, who contests the lead agency's final disposition of an allegation of maltreatment, may request the lead agency to reconsider its final disposition. The request for reconsideration must be submitted in writing to the lead agency within 15 calendar days after receipt of notice of final disposition or, if the request is made by an interested person who is not entitled to notice, within 15 days after receipt of the notice by the vulnerable adult or the vulnerable adult's legal guardian. If mailed, the request for reconsideration must be postmarked and sent to the lead agency within 15 calendar days of the individual's or facility's receipt of the final disposition. If the request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the lead agency within 15 calendar days of the individual's or facility's receipt of the final disposition. An individual who was determined to have maltreated a vulnerable adult under this section and who was disqualified on the basis of serious or recurring maltreatment under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, may request reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification. The request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification must be submitted in writing within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification under sections 245C.16 and 245C.17. If mailed, the request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification must be postmarked and sent to the lead agency within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If the request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the lead agency within 30 calendar days after the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.

 

(b) Except as provided under paragraphs (e) and (f), if the lead agency denies the request or fails to act upon the request within 15 working days after receiving the request for reconsideration, the person or facility entitled to a fair hearing under section 256.045, may submit to the commissioner of human services a written request for a hearing under that statute. The vulnerable adult, or an interested person acting on behalf of the vulnerable adult, may request a review by the Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Review Panel under section 256.021 if the lead agency denies the request or fails to act upon the request, or if the vulnerable adult or interested person contests a reconsidered disposition. The lead agency shall notify persons who request reconsideration of their rights under this paragraph. The request must be submitted in writing to the review panel and a copy sent to the lead agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice of a denial of a request for reconsideration or of a reconsidered disposition. The request must specifically identify the aspects of the agency determination with which the person is dissatisfied.

 

(c) If, as a result of a reconsideration or review, the lead agency changes the final disposition, it shall notify the parties specified in subdivision 9c, paragraph (d).

 

(d) For purposes of this subdivision, "interested person acting on behalf of the vulnerable adult" means a person designated in writing by the vulnerable adult to act on behalf of the vulnerable adult, or a legal guardian or conservator or other legal representative, a proxy or health care agent appointed under chapter 145B or 145C, or an individual who is related to the vulnerable adult, as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 13.

 

(e) If an individual was disqualified under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, on the basis of a determination of maltreatment, which was serious or recurring, and the individual has requested reconsideration of the maltreatment determination under paragraph (a) and reconsideration of the disqualification under sections 245C.21 to 245C.27, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and requested reconsideration of the disqualification shall be


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6924

consolidated into a single reconsideration. If reconsideration of the maltreatment determination is denied or if the disqualification is not set aside under sections 245C.21 to 245C.27, the individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045. If an individual requests a fair hearing on the maltreatment determination and the disqualification, the scope of the fair hearing shall include both the maltreatment determination and the disqualification.

 

(f) If a maltreatment determination or a disqualification based on serious or recurring maltreatment is the basis for a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, the license holder has the right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. As provided for under section 245A.08, the scope of the contested case hearing shall must include the maltreatment determination, disqualification, and licensing sanction or denial of a license. In such cases, a fair hearing shall must not be conducted under paragraph (b). When a fine is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment and the fine is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination, if the license holder appeals the maltreatment and fine, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall not be conducted under this section. section 256.045. Except for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment determination under this subdivision, and reconsideration of a disqualification under section 245C.22, must not be conducted when:

 

(1) a denial of a license under section 245A.05, or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder based on serious or recurring maltreatment;

 

(2) the denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the maltreatment determination or disqualification; and

 

(3) the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, and denial of a license or licensing sanction.

 

Notwithstanding clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination shall be conducted under section 626.556, subdivision 10i, and section 626.557, subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted under section 245C.22. In such cases, a fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27, 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.

 

If the disqualified subject is an individual other than the license holder and upon whom a background study must be conducted under chapter 245C, the hearings of all parties may be consolidated into a single contested case hearing upon consent of all parties and the administrative law judge.

 

(g) Until August 1, 2002, an individual or facility that was determined by the commissioner of human services or the commissioner of health to be responsible for neglect under section 626.5572, subdivision 17, after October 1, 1995, and before August 1, 2001, that believes that the finding of neglect does not meet an amended definition of neglect may request a reconsideration of the determination of neglect. The commissioner of human services or the commissioner of health shall mail a notice to the last known address of individuals who are eligible to seek this reconsideration. The request for reconsideration must state how the established findings no longer meet the elements of the definition of neglect. The commissioner shall review the request for reconsideration and make a determination within 15 calendar days. The commissioner's decision on this reconsideration is the final agency action.

 

(1) For purposes of compliance with the data destruction schedule under subdivision 12b, paragraph (d), when a finding of substantiated maltreatment has been changed as a result of a reconsideration under this paragraph, the date of the original finding of a substantiated maltreatment must be used to calculate the destruction date.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6925

(2) For purposes of any background studies under chapter 245C, when a determination of substantiated maltreatment has been changed as a result of a reconsideration under this paragraph, any prior disqualification of the individual under chapter 245C that was based on this determination of maltreatment shall be rescinded, and for future background studies under chapter 245C the commissioner must not use the previous determination of substantiated maltreatment as a basis for disqualification or as a basis for referring the individual's maltreatment history to a health-related licensing board under section 245C.31.

 

Sec. 57. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 626.5572, subdivision 17, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 17. Neglect. "Neglect" means:

 

(a) The failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is:

 

(1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and

 

(2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct.

 

(b) The absence or likelihood of absence of care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision necessary to maintain the physical and mental health of the vulnerable adult which a reasonable person would deem essential to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's health, safety, or comfort considering the physical or mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult.

 

(c) For purposes of this section, a vulnerable adult is not neglected for the sole reason that:

 

(1) the vulnerable adult or a person with authority to make health care decisions for the vulnerable adult under sections 144.651, 144A.44, chapter 145B, 145C, or 252A, or sections 253B.03 or 524.5-101 to 524.5-502, refuses consent or withdraws consent, consistent with that authority and within the boundary of reasonable medical practice, to any therapeutic conduct, including any care, service, or procedure to diagnose, maintain, or treat the physical or mental condition of the vulnerable adult, or, where permitted under law, to provide nutrition and hydration parenterally or through intubation; this paragraph does not enlarge or diminish rights otherwise held under law by:

 

(i) a vulnerable adult or a person acting on behalf of a vulnerable adult, including an involved family member, to consent to or refuse consent for therapeutic conduct; or

 

(ii) a caregiver to offer or provide or refuse to offer or provide therapeutic conduct; or

 

(2) the vulnerable adult, a person with authority to make health care decisions for the vulnerable adult, or a caregiver in good faith selects and depends upon spiritual means or prayer for treatment or care of disease or remedial care of the vulnerable adult in lieu of medical care, provided that this is consistent with the prior practice or belief of the vulnerable adult or with the expressed intentions of the vulnerable adult;

 

(3) the vulnerable adult, who is not impaired in judgment or capacity by mental or emotional dysfunction or undue influence, engages in consensual sexual contact with:

 

(i) a person including a facility staff person when a consensual sexual personal relationship existed prior to the caregiving relationship; or

 

(ii) a personal care attendant, regardless of whether the consensual sexual personal relationship existed prior to the caregiving relationship; or


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6926

(4) an individual makes an error in the provision of therapeutic conduct to a vulnerable adult which does not result in injury or harm which reasonably requires medical or mental health care; or

 

(5) an individual makes an error in the provision of therapeutic conduct to a vulnerable adult that results in injury or harm, which reasonably requires the care of a physician, and:

 

(i) the necessary care is provided in a timely fashion as dictated by the condition of the vulnerable adult;

 

(ii) if after receiving care, the health status of the vulnerable adult can be reasonably expected, as determined by the attending physician, to be restored to the vulnerable adult's preexisting condition;

 

(iii) the error is not part of a pattern of errors by the individual;

 

(iv) if in a facility, the error is immediately reported as required under section 626.557, and recorded internally in the facility;

 

(v) if in a facility, the facility identifies and takes corrective action and implements measures designed to reduce the risk of further occurrence of this error and similar errors; and

 

(vi) if in a facility, the actions required under items (iv) and (v) are sufficiently documented for review and evaluation by the facility and any applicable licensing, certification, and ombudsman agency.

 

(d) Nothing in this definition requires a caregiver, if regulated, to provide services in excess of those required by the caregiver's license, certification, registration, or other regulation.

 

(e) If the findings of an investigation by a lead agency result in a determination of substantiated maltreatment for the sole reason that the actions required of a facility under paragraph (c), clause (5), item (iv), (v), or (vi), were not taken, then the facility is subject to a correction order. An individual will not be found to have neglected or maltreated the vulnerable adult based solely on the facility's not having taken the actions required under paragraph (c), clause (5), item (iv), (v), or (vi). This must not alter the lead agency's determination of mitigating factors under section 626.557, subdivision 9c, paragraph (c).

 

Sec. 58. BACKGROUND STUDY REVIEW.

 

(a) The Collateral Consequences Committee described in Laws 2006, chapter 260, article 1, section 45, or successor entity, shall review the background study provisions contained in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 245C, as well as set-aside and variance policies. The committee shall recommend changes in these laws to recodify and simplify them, and recommend appropriate substantive changes to them consistent with good public policy and public safety.

 

(b) By February 1, 2008, the committee shall report its findings and recommendations to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees having jurisdiction over human services and criminal justice policy.

 

Sec. 59. REPEALER.

 

(a) Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 245A.023; 245A.14, subdivisions 7, 9, 9a, 12, and 13; and 245C.06, are repealed.

 

(b) Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0385; and 9503.0035, are repealed."


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6927

Delete the title and insert:

 

"A bill for an act relating to human services; making changes to licensing provisions; modifying data practices, program administration, disaster plans, education programs, conditional license provisions, suspensions, sanctions, and contested case hearings, child care center training, family child care training requirements, vulnerable adults, maltreatment of minors, background studies, disqualifications, reconsiderations, disqualification set-asides, fair hearings, appeals, changing definitions of neglect and physical abuse; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, subdivisions 2, 4; 245A.03, subdivision 2; 245A.04, subdivision 11, by adding subdivisions; 245A.06, subdivision 4; 245A.07, subdivisions 2a, 3, by adding a subdivision; 245A.08, subdivision 2a; 245A.10, subdivision 2; 245A.11, subdivision 7; 245A.14, subdivision 8; 245A.144; 245A.1445; 245A.145, subdivision 1; 245A.18, subdivision 2; 245A.65, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 245C.02, by adding a subdivision; 245C.05, subdivision 3; 245C.07; 245C.08; 245C.09, subdivision 1; 245C.11, by adding a subdivision; 245C.13, subdivision 2; 245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 245C.16, subdivision 1; 245C.17, subdivisions 2, 3; 245C.21, subdivisions 2, 3; 245C.22, subdivisions 4, 5; 245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 245C.28, subdivision 1; 245C.301; 256B.0919, by adding a subdivision; 256B.092, by adding a subdivision; 270B.14, subdivision 1; 626.556, subdivisions 2, 10e, 10i; 626.557, subdivisions 9c, 9d; 626.5572, subdivision 17; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 245A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 245A.023; 245A.14, subdivisions 7, 9, 9a, 12, 13; 245C.06; Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0385; 9503.0035."

 

 

We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.

 

Senate Conferees: Yvonne Prettner Solon, Linda Higgins and Michelle L. Fischbach.

 

House Conferees: John Lesch, Neva Walker and Jim Abeler.

 

 

Lesch moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 1724 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.

 

 

S. F. No. 1724, A bill for an act relating to human services; making changes to licensing provisions; modifying data practices, program administration, disaster plans, education programs, conditional license provisions, suspensions, sanctions, and contested case hearings, child care center training, family child care training requirements, vulnerable adults, maltreatment of minors, background studies, disqualifications, reconsiderations, disqualification set-asides, fair hearings, appeals, changing definitions of neglect and physical abuse; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, subdivisions 2, 4; 245A.03, subdivision 2; 245A.04, subdivision 11, by adding subdivisions; 245A.06, subdivision 4; 245A.07, subdivisions 2a, 3, by adding a subdivision; 245A.08, subdivision 2a; 245A.10, subdivision 2; 245A.14, subdivision 8; 245A.144; 245A.1445; 245A.145, subdivision 1; 245A.18, subdivision 2; 245A.65, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 245C.02, by adding a subdivision; 245C.05, subdivision 3; 245C.07; 245C.08; 245C.09, subdivision 1; 245C.11, by adding a subdivision; 245C.13, subdivision 2; 245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 245C.16, subdivision 1; 245C.17, subdivisions 2, 3; 245C.21, subdivisions 2, 3; 245C.22, subdivisions 4, 5; 245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 245C.28, subdivision 1; 245C.301; 256B.0919, by adding a subdivision; 256B.092, by adding a subdivision; 270B.14, subdivision 1; 626.556, subdivisions 2, 10e, 10i; 626.557, subdivisions 9c, 9d; 626.5572, subdivision 17; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 245A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 245A.023; 245A.14, subdivisions 7, 9, 9a, 12, 13; 245C.06; Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0385; 9503.0035.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6928

The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 103 yeas and 27 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Berns

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Demmer

Dill

Dittrich

Dominguez

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Erhardt

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Gottwalt

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kranz

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Norton

Olin

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruth

Ruud

Sailer

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Swails

Thissen

Tillberry

Tingelstad

Tschumper

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Wardlow

Welti

Winkler

Wollschlager

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Beard

Buesgens

Dean

DeLaForest

Emmer

Erickson

Finstad

Garofalo

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Kohls

Magnus

Nornes

Olson

Peppin

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Simpson

Sviggum

Thao

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.

 

 

CALENDAR FOR THE DAY

 

 

S. F. No. 1262 was reported to the House.

 

 

Thissen moved to amend S. F. No. 1262, the second engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 3, line 21, delete everything after "manufacture"

 

Page 3, line 22, delete "distribute for free"

 

Page 3, after line 23, insert "(b) No person shall offer for sale, sell, label, or distribute for free any jewelry represented to contain safe levels of lead, unless the jewelry is made entirely from a Class 1, Class 2, or Class 3 material, or any combination thereof."

 

Page 3, line 24, delete "(b)" and insert "(c)" and delete everything after "manufacture"


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6929

Page 3, line 25, delete "or distribute for free"

 

Page 4, after line 2, insert:

 

"(d) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), no person shall offer for sale, sell, distribute for free, or label any jewelry as children's jewelry represented to contain safe levels of lead, unless the jewelry is made entirely from one or more of the following materials:

 

(1) a nonmetallic material that is a Class 1 material;

 

(2) a nonmetallic material that is a Class 2 material;

 

(3) a metallic material that is either a Class 1 material or contains less than 0.06 percent (600 parts per million) lead by weight;

 

(4) glass or crystal decorative components that weigh in total no more than one gram, excluding any glass or crystal decorative component that contains less than 0.02 percent (200 parts per million) lead by weight and has no intentionally added lead;

 

(5) printing ink or ceramic glaze that contains less than 0.06 percent (600 parts per million) lead by weight; or

 

(6) Class 3 material that contains less than 0.02 percent (200 parts per million) lead by weight."

 

Page 4, line 3, delete "(c)" and insert "(e)"

 

Page 4, line 11, delete "(d)" and insert "(f)"

 

Page 4, delete lines 14 and 15

 

Page 4, line 16, delete "4" and insert "3"

 

Page 5, line 12, delete "5" and insert "4"

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

S. F. No. 1262, A bill for an act relating to commerce; regulating the manufacture and sale of jewelry products containing lead; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325E.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6930

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 123 yeas and 7 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Berns

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dean

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dill

Dittrich

Dominguez

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Erhardt

Faust

Finstad

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Kranz

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Nornes

Norton

Olin

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruth

Ruud

Sailer

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Simpson

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sviggum

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Tingelstad

Tschumper

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Wardlow

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Wollschlager

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Buesgens

Emmer

Erickson

Hackbarth

Holberg

Olson


 

 

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

S. F. No. 221 was reported to the House.

 

There being no objection, S. F. No. 221 was temporarily laid over on Calendar for the Day.

 

 

S. F. No. 1271 was reported to the House.

 

 

Smith moved to amend S. F. No. 1271, the second engrossment, as follows:

 

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

 

"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518.68, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Contents. The required notices must be substantially as follows:


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6931

IMPORTANT NOTICE

 

1. PAYMENTS TO PUBLIC AGENCY

 

According to Minnesota Statutes, section 518A.50, payments ordered for maintenance and support must be paid to the public agency responsible for child support enforcement as long as the person entitled to receive the payments is receiving or has applied for public assistance or has applied for support and maintenance collection services. MAIL PAYMENTS TO:

 

2. DEPRIVING ANOTHER OF CUSTODIAL OR PARENTAL RIGHTS -- A FELONY

 

A person may be charged with a felony who conceals a minor child or takes, obtains, retains, or fails to return a minor child from or to the child's parent (or person with custodial or visitation rights), according to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.26. A copy of that section is available from any district court clerk.

 

3. NONSUPPORT OF A SPOUSE OR CHILD -- CRIMINAL PENALTIES

 

A person who fails to pay court-ordered child support or maintenance may be charged with a crime, which may include misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony charges, according to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.375. A copy of that section is available from any district court clerk.

 

4. RULES OF SUPPORT, MAINTENANCE, PARENTING TIME

 

(a) Payment of support or spousal maintenance is to be as ordered, and the giving of gifts or making purchases of food, clothing, and the like will not fulfill the obligation.

 

(b) Payment of support must be made as it becomes due, and failure to secure or denial of parenting time is NOT an excuse for nonpayment, but the aggrieved party must seek relief through a proper motion filed with the court.

 

(c) Nonpayment of support is not grounds to deny parenting time. The party entitled to receive support may apply for support and collection services, file a contempt motion, or obtain a judgment as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 548.091.

 

(d) The payment of support or spousal maintenance takes priority over payment of debts and other obligations.

 

(e) A party who accepts additional obligations of support does so with the full knowledge of the party's prior obligation under this proceeding.

 

(f) Child support or maintenance is based on annual income, and it is the responsibility of a person with seasonal employment to budget income so that payments are made throughout the year as ordered.

 

(g) Reasonable parenting time guidelines are contained in Appendix B, which is available from the court administrator.

 

(h) The nonpayment of support may be enforced through the denial of student grants; interception of state and federal tax refunds; suspension of driver's, recreational, and occupational licenses; referral to the department of revenue or private collection agencies; seizure of assets, including bank accounts and other assets held by financial institutions; reporting to credit bureaus; interest charging, income withholding, and contempt proceedings; and other enforcement methods allowed by law.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6932

(i) The public authority may suspend or resume collection of the amount allocated for child care expenses if the conditions of section 518A.40, subdivision 4, are met.

 

(j) The public authority may remove or resume a medical support offset if the conditions of section 518A.41, subdivision 16, are met.

 

(k) The public authority may suspend or resume interest charging on child support judgments if the conditions of section 548.091, subdivision 1a, are met.

 

5. MODIFYING CHILD SUPPORT

 

If either the obligor or obligee is laid off from employment or receives a pay reduction, child support may be modified, increased, or decreased. Any modification will only take effect when it is ordered by the court, and will only relate back to the time that a motion is filed. Either the obligor or obligee may file a motion to modify child support, and may request the public agency for help. UNTIL A MOTION IS FILED, THE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION WILL CONTINUE AT THE CURRENT LEVEL. THE COURT IS NOT PERMITTED TO REDUCE SUPPORT RETROACTIVELY.

 

6. PARENTAL RIGHTS FROM MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 518.17, SUBDIVISION 3

 

Unless otherwise provided by the Court:

 

(a) Each party has the right of access to, and to receive copies of, school, medical, dental, religious training, and other important records and information about the minor children. Each party has the right of access to information regarding health or dental insurance available to the minor children. Presentation of a copy of this order to the custodian of a record or other information about the minor children constitutes sufficient authorization for the release of the record or information to the requesting party.

 

(b) Each party shall keep the other informed as to the name and address of the school of attendance of the minor children. Each party has the right to be informed by school officials about the children's welfare, educational progress and status, and to attend school and parent teacher conferences. The school is not required to hold a separate conference for each party.

 

(c) In case of an accident or serious illness of a minor child, each party shall notify the other party of the accident or illness, and the name of the health care provider and the place of treatment.

 

(d) Each party has the right of reasonable access and telephone contact with the minor children.

 

7. WAGE AND INCOME DEDUCTION OF SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE

 

Child support and/or spousal maintenance may be withheld from income, with or without notice to the person obligated to pay, when the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, section 518A.53 have been met. A copy of those sections is available from any district court clerk.

 

8. CHANGE OF ADDRESS OR RESIDENCE

 

Unless otherwise ordered, each party shall notify the other party, the court, and the public authority responsible for collection, if applicable, of the following information within ten days of any change: the residential and mailing address, telephone number, driver's license number, Social Security number, and name, address, and telephone number of the employer.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6933

9. COST OF LIVING INCREASE OF SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE

 

Child Basic support and/or spousal maintenance may be adjusted every two years based upon a change in the cost of living (using Department of Labor Consumer Price Index .........., unless otherwise specified in this order) when the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, section 518A.75, are met. Cost of living increases are compounded. A copy of Minnesota Statutes, section 518A.75, and forms necessary to request or contest a cost of living increase are available from any district court clerk.

 

10. JUDGMENTS FOR UNPAID SUPPORT

 

If a person fails to make a child support payment, the payment owed becomes a judgment against the person responsible to make the payment by operation of law on or after the date the payment is due, and the person entitled to receive the payment or the public agency may obtain entry and docketing of the judgment WITHOUT NOTICE to the person responsible to make the payment under Minnesota Statutes, section 548.091. Interest begins to accrue on a payment or installment of child support whenever the unpaid amount due is greater than the current support due, according to Minnesota Statutes, section 548.091, subdivision 1a.

 

11. JUDGMENTS FOR UNPAID MAINTENANCE

 

A judgment for unpaid spousal maintenance may be entered when the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, section 548.091, are met. A copy of that section is available from any district court clerk.

 

12. ATTORNEY FEES AND COLLECTION COSTS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT

 

A judgment for attorney fees and other collection costs incurred in enforcing a child support order will be entered against the person responsible to pay support when the conditions of section 518A.735, are met. A copy of sections 518.14 and 518A.735 and forms necessary to request or contest these attorney fees and collection costs are available from any district court clerk.

 

13. PARENTING TIME EXPEDITOR PROCESS

 

On request of either party or on its own motion, the court may appoint a parenting time expeditor to resolve parenting time disputes under Minnesota Statutes, section 518.1751. A copy of that section and a description of the expeditor process is available from any district court clerk.

 

14. PARENTING TIME REMEDIES AND PENALTIES

 

Remedies and penalties for the wrongful denial of parenting time are available under Minnesota Statutes, section 518.175, subdivision 6. These include compensatory parenting time; civil penalties; bond requirements; contempt; and reversal of custody. A copy of that subdivision and forms for requesting relief are available from any district court clerk.

 

Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.28, is amended to read:

 

518A.28 PROVIDING INCOME INFORMATION.

 

(a) In any case where the parties have joint children for which a child support order must be determined, the parties shall serve and file with their initial pleadings or motion documents, a financial affidavit, disclosing all sources of gross income for purposes of section 518A.29. The financial affidavit shall include relevant supporting documentation necessary to calculate the parental income for child support under section 518A.26, subdivision 15, including, but not limited to, pay stubs for the most recent three months, employer statements, or statements of


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6934

receipts and expenses if self-employed. Documentation of earnings and income also include relevant copies of each parent's most recent federal tax returns, including W-2 forms, 1099 forms, unemployment benefit statements, workers' compensation statements, and all other documents evidencing earnings or income as received that provide verification for the financial affidavit. The commissioner of human services state court administrator shall prepare a financial affidavit form that must may be used by the parties for disclosing information under this section. The parties may provide the information required under this section in a substantially similar affidavit form.

 

(b) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a), at any time after an action seeking child support has been commenced or when a child support order is in effect, a party or the public authority may require the other party to give them a copy of the party's most recent federal tax returns that were filed with the Internal Revenue Service. The party shall provide a copy of the tax returns within 30 days of receipt of the request unless the request is not made in good faith. A request under this paragraph may not be made more than once every two years, in the absence of good cause.

 

(c) If a parent under the jurisdiction of the court does not serve and file the financial affidavit with the parent's initial pleading or motion documents, the court shall set income for that parent based on credible evidence before the court or in accordance with section 518A.32. Credible evidence may include documentation of current or recent income, testimony of the other parent concerning recent earnings and income levels, and the parent's wage reports filed with the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development under section 268.044. The court may consider credible evidence from one party that the financial affidavit submitted by the other party is false or inaccurate.

 

(d) If the court determines that a party does not have access to documents that are required to be disclosed under this section, the court may consider the testimony of that party as credible evidence of that party's income.

 

Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.32, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. General. This section applies to child support orders, including orders for past support or reimbursement of public assistance, issued under this chapter, chapter 256, 257, 518B, or 518C. If a parent is voluntarily unemployed, underemployed, or employed on a less than full-time basis, or there is no direct evidence of any income, child support must be calculated based on a determination of potential income. For purposes of this determination, it is rebuttably presumed that a parent can be gainfully employed on a full-time basis. As used in this section, "full time" means 40 hours of work in a week except in those industries, trades, or professions in which most employers, due to custom, practice, or agreement, use a normal work week of more or less than 40 hours in a week.

 

Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.32, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Parent not considered voluntarily unemployed or, underemployed, or employed on a less than full-time basis. A parent is not considered voluntarily unemployed or, underemployed, or employed on a less than full-time basis upon a showing by the parent that:

 

(1) the unemployment or, underemployment, or employment on a less than full-time basis is temporary and will ultimately lead to an increase in income; or

 

(2) the unemployment or, underemployment, or employment on a less than full-time basis represents a bona fide career change that outweighs the adverse effect of that parent's diminished income on the child.; or

 

(3) the unemployment, underemployment, or employment on a less than full-time basis is because a parent is physically or mentally incapacitated or due to incarceration, except where the reason for incarceration is the parent's nonpayment of support.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective retroactively from January 1, 2007.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6935

Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.32, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5. Caretaker. If a parent stays at home to care for a child who is subject to the child support order, the court may consider the following factors when determining whether the parent is voluntarily unemployed or, underemployed, or employed on a less than full-time basis:

 

(1) the parties' parenting and child care arrangements before the child support action;

 

(2) the stay-at-home parent's employment history, recency of employment, earnings, and the availability of jobs within the community for an individual with the parent's qualifications;

 

(3) the relationship between the employment-related expenses, including, but not limited to, child care and transportation costs required for the parent to be employed, and the income the stay-at-home parent could receive from available jobs within the community for an individual with the parent's qualifications;

 

(4) the child's age and health, including whether the child is physically or mentally disabled; and

 

(5) the availability of child care providers.

 

This subdivision does not apply if the parent stays at home only to care for other nonjoint children.

 

Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.32, subdivision 6, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 6. Economic conditions. A self-employed parent is not considered to be voluntarily unemployed or, underemployed, or employed on a less than full-time basis if that parent can show that the parent's net self-employment income is lower because of economic conditions that are directly related to the source or sources of that parent's income.

 

Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.39, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Modification. (a) The terms of an order respecting maintenance or support may be modified upon a showing of one or more of the following, any of which makes the terms unreasonable and unfair: (1) substantially increased or decreased gross income of an obligor or obligee; (2) substantially increased or decreased need of an obligor or obligee or the child or children that are the subject of these proceedings; (3) receipt of assistance under the AFDC program formerly codified under sections 256.72 to 256.87 or 256B.01 to 256B.40, or chapter 256J or 256K; (4) a change in the cost of living for either party as measured by the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics; (5) extraordinary medical expenses of the child not provided for under section 518A.41; (6) a change in the availability of appropriate health care coverage or a substantial increase or decrease in health care coverage costs; (7) the addition of work-related or education-related child care expenses of the obligee or a substantial increase or decrease in existing work-related or education-related child care expenses; or (7) (8) upon the emancipation of the child, as provided in subdivision 5.

 

(b) It is presumed that there has been a substantial change in circumstances under paragraph (a) and the terms of a current support order shall be rebuttably presumed to be unreasonable and unfair if:

 

(1) the application of the child support guidelines in section 518A.35, to the current circumstances of the parties results in a calculated court order that is at least 20 percent and at least $75 per month higher or lower than the current support order or, if the current support order is less than $75, it results in a calculated court order that is at least 20 percent per month higher or lower;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6936

(2) the medical support provisions of the order established under section 518A.41 are not enforceable by the public authority or the obligee;

 

(3) health coverage ordered under section 518A.41 is not available to the child for whom the order is established by the parent ordered to provide;

 

(4) the existing support obligation is in the form of a statement of percentage and not a specific dollar amount; or

 

(5) the gross income of an obligor or obligee has decreased by at least 20 percent through no fault or choice of the party.; or

 

(6) a deviation was granted based on the factor in section 518A.43, subdivision 1, clause (4), and the child no longer resides in a foreign country or the factor is otherwise no longer applicable.

 

(c) A child support order is not presumptively modifiable solely because an obligor or obligee becomes responsible for the support of an additional nonjoint child, which is born after an existing order. Section 518A.33 shall be considered if other grounds are alleged which allow a modification of support.

 

(d) On a motion for modification of maintenance, including a motion for the extension of the duration of a maintenance award, the court shall apply, in addition to all other relevant factors, the factors for an award of maintenance under section 518.552 that exist at the time of the motion. On a motion for modification of support, the court:

 

(1) shall apply section 518A.35, and shall not consider the financial circumstances of each party's spouse, if any; and

 

(2) shall not consider compensation received by a party for employment in excess of a 40-hour work week, provided that the party demonstrates, and the court finds, that:

 

(i) the excess employment began after entry of the existing support order;

 

(ii) the excess employment is voluntary and not a condition of employment;

 

(iii) the excess employment is in the nature of additional, part-time employment, or overtime employment compensable by the hour or fractions of an hour;

 

(iv) the party's compensation structure has not been changed for the purpose of affecting a support or maintenance obligation;

 

(v) in the case of an obligor, current child support payments are at least equal to the guidelines amount based on income not excluded under this clause; and

 

(vi) in the case of an obligor who is in arrears in child support payments to the obligee, any net income from excess employment must be used to pay the arrearages until the arrearages are paid in full.

 

(e) A modification of support or maintenance, including interest that accrued pursuant to section 548.091, may be made retroactive only with respect to any period during which the petitioning party has pending a motion for modification but only from the date of service of notice of the motion on the responding party and on the public authority if public assistance is being furnished or the county attorney is the attorney of record.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6937

(f) Except for an award of the right of occupancy of the homestead, provided in section 518.63, all divisions of real and personal property provided by section 518.58 shall be final, and may be revoked or modified only where the court finds the existence of conditions that justify reopening a judgment under the laws of this state, including motions under section 518.145, subdivision 2. The court may impose a lien or charge on the divided property at any time while the property, or subsequently acquired property, is owned by the parties or either of them, for the payment of maintenance or support money, or may sequester the property as is provided by section 518A.71.

 

(g) The court need not hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for modification of maintenance or support.

 

(h) Sections 518.14 and 518A.735 shall govern the award of attorney fees for motions brought under this subdivision.

 

(i) Except as expressly provided, an enactment, amendment, or repeal of law does not constitute a substantial change in the circumstances for purposes of modifying a child support order.

 

(j) There may be no modification of an existing child support order during the first year following January 1, 2007, except as follows:

 

(1) there is at least a 20 percent change in the gross income of the obligor;

 

(2) there is a change in the number of joint children for whom the obligor is legally responsible and actually supporting;

 

(3) a parent or another caregiver of the child who is supported by the existing support order begins to receive public assistance, as defined in section 256.741;

 

(4) there are additional work-related or education-related child care expenses of the obligee or a substantial increase or decrease in existing work-related or education-related child care expenses;

 

(5) there is a change in the availability of health care coverage, as defined in section 518A.41, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), or a substantial increase or decrease in the cost of existing health care coverage;

 

(6) the child supported by the existing child support order becomes disabled; or

 

(7) both parents consent to modification of the existing order under section 518A.34.

 

A modification under clause (4) may be granted only with respect to child care support. A modification under clause (5) may be granted only with respect to medical support. This paragraph expires January 1, 2008.

 

(k) On the first modification under the income shares method of calculation, the modification of basic support may be limited if the amount of the full variance would create hardship for either the obligor or the obligee.

 

Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.40, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Child care costs. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and approved by the court, the court must order that work-related or education-related child care costs of joint children be divided between the obligor and obligee based on their proportionate share of the parties' combined monthly PICS. The amount of work-related or education-related child care costs required by this subdivision to be divided between the obligor and obligee is the total amount received by the child care provider from the obligee and any public agency for the joint child or children. Child care costs shall be adjusted by the amount of the estimated federal and state child care credit payable on behalf of a joint child. The Department of Human Services shall develop tables to calculate the applicable credit based upon the custodial parent's PICS.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6938

Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.40, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. Change in child care. (a) When a court order provides for child care expenses, and child care support is not assigned under section 256.741, the public authority, if the public authority provides child support enforcement services, the public authority must suspend collecting the amount allocated for child care expenses when:

 

(1) either party informs the public authority that no child care costs are being incurred; and

 

(2) the public authority verifies the accuracy of the information with the other party obligee.

 

The suspension is effective as of the first day of the month following the date that the public authority received the verification. The public authority will resume collecting child care expenses when either party provides information that child care costs have resumed, or when a child care support assignment takes effect under section 256.741, subdivision 4. The resumption is effective as of the first day of the month after the date that the public authority received the information.

 

(b) If the parties provide conflicting information to the public authority regarding whether child care expenses are being incurred, or if the public authority is unable to verify with the obligee that no child care costs are being incurred, the public authority will continue or resume collecting child care expenses. Either party, by motion to the court, may challenge the suspension, continuation, or resumption of the collection of child care expenses under this subdivision. If the public authority suspends collection activities for the amount allocated for child care expenses, all other provisions of the court order remain in effect.

 

(c) In cases where there is a substantial increase or decrease in child care expenses, the parties may modify the order under section 518A.39.

 

Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. Definitions. The definitions in this subdivision apply to this chapter and chapter 518.

 

(a) "Health care coverage" means medical, dental, or other health care benefits that are provided by a one or more health plan plans. Health care coverage does not include any form of medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L public coverage.

 

(b) "Health carrier" means a carrier as defined in sections 62A.011, subdivision 2, and 62L.02, subdivision 16.

 

(c) "Health plan" means a plan meeting the definition under section 62A.011, subdivision 3, a group health plan governed under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a self-insured plan under sections 43A.23 to 43A.317 and 471.617, or a policy, contract, or certificate issued by a community-integrated service network licensed under chapter 62N. Health plan includes plans, other than any form of public coverage, that provides medical, dental, or other health care benefits and is:

 

(1) provided on an individual and or group basis;

 

(2) provided by an employer or union;

 

(3) purchased in the private market; and or

 

(4) available to a person eligible to carry insurance for the joint child, including a party's spouse or parent.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6939

Health plan includes, but is not limited to, a plan providing for dependent-only dental or vision coverage and a plan provided through a party's spouse or parent meeting the definition under section 62A.011, subdivision 3, except that the exclusion of coverage designed solely to provide dental or vision care under section 62A.011, subdivision 3, clause (6), does not apply to the definition of health plan under this section; a group health plan governed under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA); a self-insured plan under sections 43A.23 to 43A.317 and 471.617; and a policy, contract, or certificate issued by a community-integrated service network licensed under chapter 62N.

 

(d) "Medical support" means providing health care coverage for a joint child by carrying health care coverage for the joint child or by contributing to the cost of health care coverage, public coverage, unreimbursed medical expenses, and uninsured medical expenses of the joint child.

 

(e) "National medical support notice" means an administrative notice issued by the public authority to enforce health insurance provisions of a support order in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section 303.32, in cases where the public authority provides support enforcement services.

 

(f) "Public coverage" means health care benefits provided by any form of medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L.

 

(g) "Uninsured medical expenses" means a joint child's reasonable and necessary health-related expenses if the joint child is not covered by a health plan or public coverage when the expenses are incurred.

 

(h) "Unreimbursed medical expenses" means a joint child's reasonable and necessary health-related expenses if a joint child is covered by a health plan or public coverage and the plan or coverage does not pay for the total cost of the expenses when the expenses are incurred. Unreimbursed medical expenses do not include the cost of premiums. Unreimbursed medical expenses include, but are not limited to, deductibles, co-payments, and expenses for orthodontia, and prescription eyeglasses and contact lenses, but not over-the-counter medications if coverage is under a health plan.

 

Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2. Order. (a) A completed national medical support notice issued by the public authority or a court order that complies with this section is a qualified medical child support order under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, section 1169(a).

 

(b) Every order addressing child support must state:

 

(1) the names, last known addresses, and Social Security numbers of the parents and the joint child that is a subject of the order unless the court prohibits the inclusion of an address or Social Security number and orders the parents to provide the address and Social Security number to the administrator of the health plan;

 

(2) if a joint child is not presently enrolled in health care coverage, whether appropriate health care coverage for the joint child is available and, if so, state:

 

(i) which parent must carry the parents' responsibilities for carrying health care coverage;

 

(ii) the cost of premiums and how the cost is allocated between the parents;

 

(iii) how unreimbursed expenses will be allocated and collected by the parents; and


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6940

(iv) (iii) the circumstances, if any, under which the an obligation to provide health care coverage for the joint child will shift from one parent to the other; and

 

(3) if appropriate health care coverage is not available for the joint child, whether a contribution for medical support is required.; and

 

(4) how unreimbursed or uninsured medical expenses will be allocated between the parents.

 

Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Determining appropriate health care coverage. (a) In determining whether a parent has appropriate health care coverage for the joint child, the court must evaluate the health plan using consider the following factors:

 

(1) accessible coverage. Dependent health care coverage is accessible if the covered joint child can obtain services from a health plan provider with reasonable effort by the parent with whom the joint child resides. Health care coverage is presumed accessible if:

 

(i) primary care coverage is available within 30 minutes or 30 miles of the joint child's residence and specialty care coverage is available within 60 minutes or 60 miles of the joint child's residence;

 

(ii) the coverage is available through an employer and the employee can be expected to remain employed for a reasonable amount of time; and

 

(iii) no preexisting conditions exist to delay coverage unduly;

 

(2) (1) comprehensive comprehensiveness of health care coverage providing medical benefits. Dependent health care coverage providing medical benefits is presumed comprehensive if it includes medical and hospital coverage and provides for preventive, emergency, acute, and chronic care. If both parents have health care coverage providing medical benefits that meets the minimum requirements is presumed comprehensive under this paragraph, the court must determine which health care parent's coverage is more comprehensive by considering whether what other benefits are included in the coverage includes:;

 

(i) basic dental coverage;

 

(ii) orthodontia;

 

(iii) eyeglasses;

 

(iv) contact lenses;

 

(v) mental health services; or

 

(vi) substance abuse treatment;

 

(2) accessibility. Dependent health care coverage is accessible if the covered joint child can obtain services from a health plan provider with reasonable effort by the parent with whom the joint child resides. Health care coverage is presumed accessible if:

 

(i) primary care is available within 30 minutes or 30 miles of the joint child's residence and specialty care is available within 60 minutes or 60 miles of the joint child's residence;


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6941

(ii) the health care coverage is available through an employer and the employee can be expected to remain employed for a reasonable amount of time; and

 

(iii) no preexisting conditions exist to unduly delay enrollment in health care coverage;

 

(3) affordable coverage. Dependent health care coverage is affordable if it is reasonable in cost; and

 

(4) (3) the joint child's special medical needs, if any.; and

 

(b) (4) affordability. Dependent health care coverage is affordable if it is reasonable in cost. If both parents have health care coverage available for a joint child, and the court determines under paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), that the available coverage is comparable with regard to accessibility and comprehensiveness of medical benefits, accessibility, and the joint child's special needs, the least costly health care coverage is the presumed to be the most appropriate health care coverage for the joint child.

 

Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4. Ordering health care coverage. (a) If a joint child is presently enrolled in health care coverage, the court must order that the parent who currently has the joint child enrolled continue that enrollment unless the parents parties agree otherwise or a parent party requests a change in coverage and the court determines that other health care coverage is more appropriate.

 

(b) If a joint child is not presently enrolled in health care coverage providing medical benefits, upon motion of a parent or the public authority, the court must determine whether one or both parents have appropriate health care coverage providing medical benefits for the joint child and order the parent with appropriate health care coverage available to carry the coverage for the joint child.

 

(c) If only one parent has appropriate health care coverage providing medical benefits available, the court must order that parent to carry the coverage for the joint child.

 

(d) If both parents have appropriate health care coverage providing medical benefits available, the court must order the parent with whom the joint child resides to carry the coverage for the joint child, unless:

 

(1) either parent a party expresses a preference for health care coverage providing medical benefits available through the parent with whom the joint child does not reside;

 

(2) the parent with whom the joint child does not reside is already carrying dependent health care coverage providing medical benefits for other children and the cost of contributing to the premiums of the other parent's coverage would cause the parent with whom the joint child does not reside extreme hardship; or

 

(3) the parents parties agree as to provide which parent will carry health care coverage providing medical benefits and agree on the allocation of costs.

 

(e) If the exception in paragraph (d), clause (1) or (2), applies, the court must determine which parent has the most appropriate coverage providing medical benefits available and order that parent to carry coverage for the joint child. If the court determines under subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), that the parents' health care coverage for the joint child is comparable with regard to accessibility and comprehensiveness, the court must presume that the parent with the least costly health care coverage to carry coverage for the joint child.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6942

(f) If neither parent has appropriate health care coverage available, the court must order the parents to:

 

(1) contribute toward the actual health care costs of the joint children based on a pro rata share; or

 

(2) if the joint child is receiving any form of medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L public coverage, the parent with whom the joint child does not reside shall contribute a monthly amount toward the actual cost of medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L public coverage. The amount of contribution of the noncustodial parent parent's contribution is the amount the noncustodial parent would pay for the child's premiums if the noncustodial parent's PICS income meets the eligibility requirements for public coverage. determined by applying the noncustodial parent's PICS to the premium schedule for public coverage. If the noncustodial parent's PICS meets the eligibility requirements for public coverage, the contribution is the amount the noncustodial parent would pay for the child's premium. If the noncustodial parent's PICS exceeds the eligibility requirements for public coverage, the contribution is the amount of the premium for the highest eligible income on the appropriate premium schedule for public coverage. For purposes of determining the premium amount, the noncustodial parent's household size is equal to one parent plus the child or children who are the subject of the child support order. If the noncustodial parent's PICS income exceeds the eligibility requirements for public coverage, the court must order the noncustodial parent's contribution toward the full premium cost of the child's or children's coverage. The custodial parent's obligation is determined under the requirements for public coverage as set forth in chapter 256B or 256L. The court may order the parent with whom the child resides to apply for public coverage for the child.

 

(g) If neither parent has appropriate health care coverage available, the court may order the parent with whom the child resides to apply for public coverage for the child.

 

(h) The commissioner of human services must publish a table with the premium schedule for public coverage and update the chart for changes to the schedule by July 1 of each year.

 

(i) If a joint child is not presently enrolled in health care coverage providing dental benefits, upon motion of a parent or the public authority, the court must determine whether one or both parents have appropriate dental health care coverage for the joint child, and the court may order a parent with appropriate dental health care coverage available to carry the coverage for the joint child.

 

(j) If a joint child is not presently enrolled in available health care coverage providing benefits other than medical benefits or dental benefits, upon motion of a parent or the public authority, the court may determine whether that other health care coverage for the joint child is appropriate, and the court may order a parent with that appropriate health care coverage available to carry the coverage for the joint child.

 

Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5. Medical support costs; unreimbursed and uninsured medical expenses. (a) Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and approved by the court, the court must order that the cost of health care coverage and all unreimbursed and uninsured medical expenses under the health plan be divided between the obligor and obligee based on their proportionate share of the parties' combined monthly PICS. The amount allocated for medical support is considered child support but is not subject to a cost-of-living adjustment under section 518A.75.

 

(b) If a party owes a joint child support obligation for a child and is ordered to carry health care coverage for the joint child, and the other party is ordered to contribute to the carrying party's cost for coverage, the carrying party's child support payment must be reduced by the amount of the contributing party's contribution.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6943

(c) If a party owes a joint child support obligation for a child and is ordered to contribute to the other party's cost for carrying health care coverage for the joint child, the contributing party's child support payment must be increased by the amount of the contribution.

 

(d) If the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the joint child already carries dependent health care coverage for other dependents and would incur no additional premium costs to add the joint child to the existing coverage, the court must not order the other party to contribute to the premium costs for coverage of the joint child.

 

(e) If a party ordered to carry health care coverage for the joint child does not already carry dependent health care coverage but has other dependents who may be added to the ordered coverage, the full premium costs of the dependent health care coverage must be allocated between the parties in proportion to the party's share of the parties' combined PICS, unless the parties agree otherwise.

 

(f) If a party ordered to carry health care coverage for the joint child is required to enroll in a health plan so that the joint child can be enrolled in dependent health care coverage under the plan, the court must allocate the costs of the dependent health care coverage between the parties. The costs of the health care coverage for the party ordered to carry the coverage for the joint child must not be allocated between the parties.

 

Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 12, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 12. Spousal or former spousal coverage. The court must require the parent with whom the joint child does not reside to provide dependent health care coverage for the benefit of the parent with whom the joint child resides if the parent with whom the child does not reside is ordered to provide dependent health care coverage for the parties' joint child and adding the other parent to the coverage results in no additional premium cost.

 

Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 15, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 15. Enforcement. (a) Remedies available for collecting and enforcing child support apply to medical support.

 

(b) For the purpose of enforcement, the following are additional support:

 

(1) the costs of individual or group health or hospitalization coverage;

 

(2) dental coverage;

 

(3) medical costs ordered by the court to be paid by either party, including health and dental insurance health care coverage premiums paid by the obligee because of the obligor's failure to obtain coverage as ordered; and

 

(4) liabilities established under this subdivision.

 

(c) A party who fails to carry court-ordered dependent health care coverage is liable for the joint child's uninsured medical expenses unless a court order provides otherwise. A party's failure to carry court-ordered coverage, or to provide other medical support as ordered, is a basis for modification of a support order under section 518A.39, subdivision 2.

 

(d) Payments by the health carrier or employer for services rendered to the dependents that are directed to a party not owed reimbursement must be endorsed over to and forwarded to the vendor or appropriate party or the public authority. A party retaining insurance reimbursement not owed to the party is liable for the amount of the reimbursement.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6944

Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.41, subdivision 16, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 16. Offset. (a) If a party is the parent with primary physical custody as defined in section 518A.26, subdivision 17, and is an obligor ordered to contribute to the other party's cost for carrying health care coverage for the joint child, the other party's child support obligation is and spousal maintenance obligations are subject to an offset under subdivision 5.

 

(b) The public authority, if the public authority provides child support enforcement services, may remove the offset to a party's child support obligation when:

 

(1) the party's court-ordered health care coverage for the joint child terminates;

 

(2) the party does not enroll the joint child in other health care coverage; and

 

(3) a modification motion is not pending.

 

The public authority must provide notice to the parties of the action. If neither party requests a hearing, the public authority must remove the offset effective the first day of the month following termination of the joint child's health care coverage.

 

(c) The public authority, if the public authority provides child support enforcement services, may resume the offset when the party ordered to provide health care coverage for the joint child has resumed the court-ordered health care coverage or enrolled the joint child in other health care coverage. The public authority must provide notice to the parties of the action. If neither party requests a hearing, the public authority must resume the offset effective the first day of the month following certification that health care coverage is in place for the joint child.

 

(c) (d) A party may contest the public authority's action to remove or resume the offset to the child support obligation if the party makes a written request for a hearing within 30 days after receiving written notice. If a party makes a timely request for a hearing, the public authority must schedule a hearing and send written notice of the hearing to the parties by mail to the parties' last known addresses at least 14 days before the hearing. The hearing must be conducted in district court or in the expedited child support process if section 484.702 applies. The district court or child support magistrate must determine whether removing or resuming the offset is appropriate and, if appropriate, the effective date for the removal or resumption.

 

(d) If the party does not request a hearing, the public authority will remove the offset effective the first day of the month following termination of the joint child's health care coverage.

 

Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.43, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1. General factors. Among other reasons, deviation from the presumptive child support obligation computed under section 518A.34 is intended to encourage prompt and regular payments of child support and to prevent either parent or the joint children from living in poverty. In addition to the child support guidelines and other factors used to calculate the child support obligation under section 518A.34, the court must take into consideration the following factors in setting or modifying child support or in determining whether to deviate upward or downward from the presumptive child support obligation:

 

(1) all earnings, income, circumstances, and resources of each parent, including real and personal property, but excluding income from excess employment of the obligor or obligee that meets the criteria of section 518A.29, paragraph (b);


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6945

(2) the extraordinary financial needs and resources, physical and emotional condition, and educational needs of the child to be supported;

 

(3) the standard of living the child would enjoy if the parents were currently living together, but recognizing that the parents now have separate households;

 

(4) whether the child resides in a foreign country for more than one year that has a substantially higher or lower cost of living than this country;

 

(5) which parent receives the income taxation dependency exemption and the financial benefit the parent receives from it;

 

(5) (6) the parents' debts as provided in subdivision 2; and

 

(6) (7) the obligor's total payments for court-ordered child support exceed the limitations set forth in section 571.922.

 

Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 518A.75, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3. Result of hearing. If, at a hearing pursuant to this section, the obligor establishes an insufficient cost of living or other increase in income that prevents fulfillment of the adjusted maintenance or child basic support obligation, the court or child support magistrate may direct that all or part of the adjustment not take effect. If, at the hearing, the obligor does not establish this insufficient increase in income, the adjustment shall take effect as of the date it would have become effective had no hearing been requested.

 

Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 548.091, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 1a. Child support judgment by operation of law. (a) Any payment or installment of support required by a judgment or decree of dissolution or legal separation, determination of parentage, an order under chapter 518C, an order under section 256.87, or an order under section 260B.331 or 260C.331, that is not paid or withheld from the obligor's income as required under section 518A.53, or which is ordered as child support by judgment, decree, or order by a court in any other state, is a judgment by operation of law on and after the date it is due, is entitled to full faith and credit in this state and any other state, and shall be entered and docketed by the court administrator on the filing of affidavits as provided in subdivision 2a. Except as otherwise provided by paragraph paragraphs (b) and (e), interest accrues from the date the unpaid amount due is greater than the current support due at the annual rate provided in section 549.09, subdivision 1, plus two percent, not to exceed an annual rate of 18 percent. A payment or installment of support that becomes a judgment by operation of law between the date on which a party served notice of a motion for modification under section 518A.39, subdivision 2, and the date of the court's order on modification may be modified under that subdivision.

 

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 549.09, upon motion to the court and upon proof by the obligor of 12 consecutive months of complete and timely payments of both current support and court-ordered paybacks of a child support debt or arrearage, the court may order interest on the remaining debt or arrearage to stop accruing. Timely payments are those made in the month in which they are due. If, after that time, the obligor fails to make complete and timely payments of both current support and court-ordered paybacks of child support debt or arrearage, the public authority or the obligee may move the court for the reinstatement of interest as of the month in which the obligor ceased making complete and timely payments.

 

The court shall provide copies of all orders issued under this section to the public authority. The state court administrator shall prepare and make available to the court and the parties forms to be submitted by the parties in support of a motion under this paragraph.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6946

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 549.09, upon motion to the court, the court may order interest on a child support debt or arrearage to stop accruing where the court finds that the obligor is:

 

(1) unable to pay support because of a significant physical or mental disability;

 

(2) a recipient of Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title II Older Americans Survivor's Disability Insurance (OASDI), other disability benefits, or public assistance based upon need; or

 

(3) institutionalized or incarcerated for at least 30 days for an offense other than nonsupport of the child or children involved, and is otherwise financially unable to pay support.

 

(d) If the conditions in paragraph (c) no longer exist, upon motion to the court, the court may order interest accrual to resume retroactively from the date of service of the motion to resume the accrual of interest.

 

(e) Notwithstanding section 549.09, the public authority must suspend the charging of interest when:

 

(1) the obligor makes a request to the public authority that the public authority suspend the charging of interest;

 

(2) the public authority provides full IV-D child support services; and

 

(3) the obligor has made, through the public authority, 12 consecutive months of complete and timely payments of both current support and court-ordered paybacks of a child support debt or arrearage.

 

Timely payments are those made in the month in which they are due.

 

Interest charging must be suspended on the first of the month following the date of the written notice of the public authority's action to suspend the charging of interest. If, after interest charging has been suspended, the obligor fails to make complete and timely payments of both current support and court-ordered paybacks of child support debt or arrearage, the public authority may resume the charging of interest as of the first day of the month in which the obligor ceased making complete and timely payments.

 

The public authority must provide written notice to the parties of the public authority's action to suspend or resume the charging of interest. The notice must inform the parties of the right to request a hearing to contest the public authority's action. The notice must be sent by first class mail to the parties' last known addresses.

 

A party may contest the public authority's action to suspend or resume the charging of interest if the party makes a written request for a hearing within 30 days of the date of written notice. If a party makes a timely request for a hearing, the public authority must schedule a hearing and send written notice of the hearing to the parties by mail to the parties' last known addresses at least 14 days before the hearing. The hearing must be conducted in district court or in the expedited child support process if section 484.702 applies. The district court or child support magistrate must determine whether suspending or resuming the interest charging is appropriate and, if appropriate, the effective date.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2008."

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6947

S. F. No. 1271, A bill for an act relating to family law; clarifying and modifying child support laws; modifying enforcement provisions; extending time periods for enforcing child support judgments; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 518.68, subdivision 2; 518A.28; 518A.32, subdivisions 1, 3, 5, 6; 518A.39, subdivision 2; 518A.40, subdivisions 1, 4; 518A.41, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 15, 16; 518A.42, subdivision 1; 518A.43, subdivision 1; 518A.46, subdivision 5; 518A.75, subdivision 3; 541.04; 548.09, subdivision 1; 548.091, subdivisions 1a, 3b; 550.01.

 

 

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

 

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Berns

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dean

DeLaForest

Demmer

Dill

Dittrich

Dominguez

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Emmer

Erhardt

Erickson

Faust

Finstad

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Heidgerken

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jaros

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Kranz

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Madore

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Moe

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Nornes

Norton

Olin

Olson

Otremba

Ozment

Paulsen

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Peterson, A.

Peterson, N.

Peterson, S.

Poppe

Rukavina

Ruth

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Simpson

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sviggum

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Tingelstad

Tschumper

Urdahl

Wagenius

Walker

Ward

Wardlow

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Wollschlager

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

S. F. No. 1396 was reported to the House.

 

 

There being no objection, S. F. No. 1396 was temporarily laid over on Calendar for the Day.

 

 

The Speaker called Pelowski to the Chair.

 

 

H. F. No. 1283 was reported to the House.


Journal of the House - 72nd Day - Friday, May 18, 2007 - Top of Page 6948

Eastlund moved to amend H. F. No. 1283, the fourth engrossment, as follows: