STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010
_____________________
NINETY-FOURTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, April 28,
2010
The House of Representatives convened at 2:00
p.m. and was called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the
House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Marty
Hancer, Trinity Lutheran Church, Princeton, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Champion, Haws and Sertich were excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. Hausman
moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the
Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 184 and
H. F. No. 3448, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Rukavina moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 184 be substituted for
H. F. No. 3448 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 345 and
H. F. No. 1005, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Reinert moved that the rules be so far suspended
that S. F. No. 345 be substituted for
H. F. No. 1005 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 560 and
H. F. No. 891, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Champion moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 560 be substituted for
H. F. No. 891 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1060 and
H. F. No. 605, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Hortman moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1060 be substituted for H. F. No. 605
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1905 and
H. F. No. 2163, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Loeffler moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1905 be substituted for
H. F. No. 2163 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2493 and
H. F. No. 2470, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Hilstrom moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2493 be substituted for
H. F. No. 2470 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2510 and
H. F. No. 2781, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Obermueller moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2510 be substituted for
H. F. No. 2781 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2756 and
H. F. No. 3168, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Nelson moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2756 be substituted for
H. F. No. 3168 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2880 and
H. F. No. 2990, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Hilstrom moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2880 be substituted for
H. F. No. 2990 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3046 and
H. F. No. 3429, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Welti moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 3046 be substituted for
H. F. No. 3429 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following communications were
received:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
SAINT PAUL 55155
April 22, 2010
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The State of
Minnesota
Dear Speaker
Kelliher:
Please be advised that I have received,
approved, signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the
following House Files:
H. F. No. 3405, relating to
human services; modifying the commissioner's duties related to the state medical
review team.
H. F. No. 3151, relating to
mortuary science; modifying provisions related to viewing, transporting, and
removal of a dead human body.
H. F. No. 776, relating to
judgments; enacting the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act
adopted and recommended for passage by the National Conference of Commissioners
on Uniform State Laws.
H. F. No. 1692, relating to
dispute resolution; providing for arbitration of disputes; adopting the Uniform
Arbitration Act.
H. F. No. 2851, relating to
highways; removing Route No. 297 and a portion of Route No. 332 from
trunk highway system.
H. F. No. 3096, relating to
state procurement; modifying provisions governing the provision of services by
rehabilitation facilities, extended employment providers, and day training and
habilitation service programs.
H. F. No. 3393, relating to
real property; amending the Minnesota Common Interest Ownership Act; making
clarifying, conforming, and technical changes.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
ST. PAUL 55155
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President of
the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the
following enrolled Acts of the 2010 Session of the State Legislature have been
received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the
Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution,
Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2010 |
Date Filed 2010 |
2808 255 11:42
a.m. April 22 April
22
3116 256 11:43
a.m. April 22 April
22
2572 257 11:45
a.m. April 22 April
22
2152 258 11:56
a.m. April 22 April
22
2363 259 11:57
a.m. April 22 April
22
2944 260 11:58
a.m. April 22 April
22
3405 261 11:59 a.m. April 22 April 22
3151 262 4:03 p.m. April 22 April 22
776 263 12:21 p.m. April 22 April 22
1692 264 12:28 p.m. April 22 April 22
2851 265 12:29 p.m. April 22 April 22
3096 266 12:30 p.m. April 22 April 22
3393 267 12:31 p.m. April 22 April 22
2339 268 12:37
p.m. April 22 April
22
2690 269 12:22
p.m. April 22 April
22
2717 270 12:27
p.m. April 22 April
22
Sincerely,
Mark
Ritchie
Secretary
of State
REPORTS OF
STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Solberg
from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2562,
A bill for an act relating to human services; extending eligibility for the
COBRA premium state subsidy; authorizing carryforward of unexpended funds for
COBRA grants; changing appropriations; amending Laws 2009, chapter 79, article
5, section 78, subdivision 5; article 13, section 3, subdivision 6.
Reported the
same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson
from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2614,
A bill for an act relating to human services; establishing an intensive care
management program for medical assistance enrollees; reducing funding for the
medical assistance program; requiring a request for proposals; requiring a
report; appropriating money; amending Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 13,
section 3, subdivision 6, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 256B.
Reported
the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the
enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE
1
DHS
LICENSING
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
245C.27, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Fair
hearing when disqualification is not set aside rescinded. (a) If the commissioner does not set
aside rescind a disqualification of an individual under section
245C.22 who is disqualified on the basis of a preponderance of evidence that
the individual committed an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the
crimes listed in section 245C.15; for a determination under section 626.556 or
626.557 of substantiated maltreatment that was serious or recurring under
section 245C.15; or for failure to make required reports under section 626.556,
subdivision 3; or 626.557, subdivision 3, pursuant to section 245C.15, subdivision
4, paragraph (b), clause (1), the individual may request a fair hearing under
section 256.045, unless the disqualification is deemed conclusive under section
245C.29.
(b) The
fair hearing is the only administrative appeal of the final agency determination
for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual. The disqualified individual does not have the
right to challenge the accuracy and completeness of data under section 13.04.
(c) Except
as provided under paragraph (e), if the individual was disqualified based on a
conviction of, admission to, or Alford Plea to any crimes listed in section
245C.15, subdivisions 1 to 4, or for a disqualification under section 256.98,
subdivision 8, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22 is the final
agency determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual and
is not subject to a hearing under section 256.045. If the individual was disqualified based on a
judicial determination, that determination is treated the same as a conviction
for purposes of appeal.
(d) This
subdivision does not apply to a public employee's appeal of a disqualification
under section 245C.28, subdivision 3.
(e)
Notwithstanding paragraph (c), if the commissioner does not set aside a
disqualification of an individual who was disqualified based on both a
preponderance of evidence and a conviction or admission, the individual may
request a fair hearing under section 256.045, unless the disqualifications are
deemed conclusive under section 245C.29.
The scope of the hearing conducted under section 256.045 with regard to
the disqualification based on a conviction or admission shall be limited solely
to whether the individual poses a risk of harm, according to section 256.045,
subdivision 3b. In this case, the reconsideration
decision under section 245C.22 is not the final agency decision for purposes of
appeal by the disqualified individual.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 245C.27,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Consolidated
fair hearing. (a) If an individual
who is disqualified on the bases of serious or recurring maltreatment requests
a fair hearing on the maltreatment determination under section 626.556,
subdivision 10i, or 626.557, subdivision 9d, and requests a fair hearing under
this section on the disqualification, which has not been set aside
rescinded, the scope of the fair hearing under section 256.045 shall
include the maltreatment determination and the disqualification.
(b) A fair
hearing is the only administrative appeal of the final agency determination. The disqualified individual does not have the
right to challenge the accuracy and completeness of data under section 13.04.
(c) This subdivision does not
apply to a public employee's appeal of a disqualification under section
245C.28, subdivision 3.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 245C.28,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Employees
of public employer. (a) If the
commissioner does not set aside rescind the disqualification of
an individual who is an employee of an employer, as defined in section 179A.03,
subdivision 15, the individual may request a contested case hearing under
chapter 14, unless the disqualification is deemed conclusive under section
245C.29. The request for a contested
case hearing must be made in writing and must be postmarked and sent within 30
calendar days after the employee receives notice that the disqualification has
not been set aside rescinded.
If the individual was disqualified based on a conviction or admission to
any crimes listed in section 245C.15, the scope of the contested case hearing
shall be limited solely to whether the individual poses a risk of harm pursuant
to section 245C.22.
(b) If the
commissioner does not set aside rescind a disqualification that
is based on a maltreatment determination, the scope of the contested case
hearing must include the maltreatment determination and the disqualification. In such cases, a fair hearing must not be
conducted under section 256.045.
(c) If the
commissioner does not rescind a disqualification that is based on a
preponderance of evidence that the individual committed an act or acts that
meet the definition of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15, the scope
of the contested case hearing must include the disqualification decision. In such cases, a fair hearing must not be
conducted under section 256.045.
(c) (d) Rules
adopted under this chapter may not preclude an employee in a contested case
hearing for a disqualification from submitting evidence concerning information
gathered under this chapter.
(d) (e) When an
individual has been disqualified from multiple licensed programs and the
disqualifications have not been set aside rescinded under section
245C.22, if at least one of the disqualifications entitles the person to a
contested case hearing under this subdivision, the scope of the contested case
hearing shall include all disqualifications from licensed programs which were
not set aside rescinded.
(e) (f) In
determining whether the disqualification should be set aside, the
administrative law judge shall consider all of the characteristics that cause
the individual to be disqualified in order to determine whether the individual
poses a risk of harm. The administrative
law judge's recommendation and the commissioner's order to set aside a
disqualification that is the subject of the hearing constitutes a determination
that the individual does not pose a risk of harm and that the individual may
provide direct contact services in the individual program specified in the
set aside.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256.045, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. State
agency hearings. (a) State agency
hearings are available for the following:
(1) any
person applying for, receiving or having received public assistance, medical
care, or a program of social services granted by the state agency or a county
agency or the federal Food Stamp Act whose application for assistance is
denied, not acted upon with reasonable promptness, or whose assistance is
suspended, reduced, terminated, or claimed to have been incorrectly paid;
(2) any
patient or relative aggrieved by an order of the commissioner under section
252.27;
(3) a party
aggrieved by a ruling of a prepaid health plan;
(4) except as provided under
chapter 245C, any individual or facility determined by a lead agency to have
maltreated a vulnerable adult under section 626.557 after they have exercised
their right to administrative reconsideration under section 626.557;
(5) any
person whose claim for foster care payment according to a placement of the
child resulting from a child protection assessment under section 626.556 is
denied or not acted upon with reasonable promptness, regardless of funding
source;
(6) any
person to whom a right of appeal according to this section is given by other
provision of law;
(7) an
applicant aggrieved by an adverse decision to an application for a hardship
waiver under section 256B.15;
(8) an applicant
aggrieved by an adverse decision to an application or redetermination for a
Medicare Part D prescription drug subsidy under section 256B.04, subdivision
4a;
(9) except
as provided under chapter 245A, an individual or facility determined to have maltreated
a minor under section 626.556, after the individual or facility has exercised
the right to administrative reconsideration under section 626.556;
(10) except
as provided under chapter 245C, an individual disqualified under sections
245C.14 and 245C.15, which has not been set aside rescinded under
sections 245C.22 and 245C.23, on the basis of serious or recurring
maltreatment; a preponderance of the evidence that the individual has committed
an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the crimes listed in section
245C.15, subdivisions 1 to 4; or for failing to make reports required under
section 626.556, subdivision 3, or 626.557, subdivision 3. Hearings regarding a maltreatment
determination under clause (4) or (9) and a disqualification under this clause
in which the basis for a disqualification is serious or recurring maltreatment,
which has not been set aside rescinded under sections 245C.22 and
245C.23, shall be consolidated into a single fair hearing. In such cases, the scope of review by the
human services referee shall include both the maltreatment determination and
the disqualification. The failure to
exercise the right to an administrative reconsideration shall not be a bar to a
hearing under this section if federal law provides an individual the right to a
hearing to dispute a finding of maltreatment.
Individuals and organizations specified in this section may contest the
specified action, decision, or final disposition before the state agency by
submitting a written request for a hearing to the state agency within 30 days
after receiving written notice of the action, decision, or final disposition,
or within 90 days of such written notice if the applicant, recipient, patient,
or relative shows good cause why the request was not submitted within the
30-day time limit; or
(11) any
person with an outstanding debt resulting from receipt of public assistance,
medical care, or the federal Food Stamp Act who is contesting a setoff claim by
the Department of Human Services or a county agency. The scope of the appeal is the validity of
the claimant agency's intention to request a setoff of a refund under chapter
270A against the debt.
(b) The
hearing for an individual or facility under paragraph (a), clause (4), (9), or
(10), is the only administrative appeal to the final agency determination
specifically, including a challenge to the accuracy and completeness of data
under section 13.04. Hearings requested
under paragraph (a), clause (4), apply only to incidents of maltreatment that
occur on or after October 1, 1995. Hearings
requested by nursing assistants in nursing homes alleged to have maltreated a
resident prior to October 1, 1995, shall be held as a contested case proceeding
under the provisions of chapter 14. Hearings
requested under paragraph (a), clause (9), apply only to incidents of
maltreatment that occur on or after July 1, 1997. A hearing for an individual or facility under
paragraph (a), clause (9), is only available when there is no juvenile court or
adult criminal action pending. If such
action is filed in either court while an administrative review is pending, the
administrative review must be suspended until the judicial actions are
completed. If the juvenile court action
or criminal charge is dismissed or the criminal action overturned, the matter
may be considered in an administrative hearing.
(c) For purposes of this
section, bargaining unit grievance procedures are not an administrative appeal.
(d) The
scope of hearings involving claims to foster care payments under paragraph (a),
clause (5), shall be limited to the issue of whether the county is legally
responsible for a child's placement under court order or voluntary placement
agreement and, if so, the correct amount of foster care payment to be made on
the child's behalf and shall not include review of the propriety of the
county's child protection determination or child placement decision.
(e) A
vendor of medical care as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 7, or a
vendor under contract with a county agency to provide social services is not a
party and may not request a hearing under this section, except if assisting a
recipient as provided in subdivision 4.
(f) An
applicant or recipient is not entitled to receive social services beyond the
services prescribed under chapter 256M or other social services the person is
eligible for under state law.
(g) The
commissioner may summarily affirm the county or state agency's proposed action
without a hearing when the sole issue is an automatic change due to a change in
state or federal law.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 626.556,
subdivision 10i, is amended to read:
Subd. 10i. Administrative
reconsideration; review panel. (a)
Administrative reconsideration is not applicable in family assessments since no
determination concerning maltreatment is made.
For investigations, except as provided under paragraph (e), an
individual or facility that the commissioner of human services, a local social
service agency, or the commissioner of education determines has maltreated a
child, an interested person acting on behalf of the child, regardless of the
determination, who contests the investigating agency's final determination
regarding maltreatment, may request the investigating agency to reconsider its
final determination regarding maltreatment.
The request for reconsideration must be submitted in writing to the
investigating agency within 15 calendar days after receipt of notice of the
final determination regarding maltreatment or, if the request is made by an
interested person who is not entitled to notice, within 15 days after receipt
of the notice by the parent or guardian of the child. If mailed, the request for reconsideration
must be postmarked and sent to the investigating agency within 15 calendar days
of the individual's or facility's receipt of the final determination. If the request for reconsideration is made by
personal service, it must be received by the investigating agency within 15
calendar days after the individual's or facility's receipt of the final
determination. Effective January 1,
2002, an individual who was determined to have maltreated a child under this
section and who was disqualified on the basis of serious or recurring
maltreatment under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, may request reconsideration of
the maltreatment determination and the disqualification. The request for reconsideration of the
maltreatment determination and the disqualification must be submitted within 30
calendar days of the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification
under sections 245C.16 and 245C.17. If
mailed, the request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and
the disqualification must be postmarked and sent to the investigating agency
within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the maltreatment
determination and notice of disqualification.
If the request for reconsideration is made by personal service, it must
be received by the investigating agency within 30 calendar days after the
individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.
(b) Except
as provided under paragraphs (e) and (f), if the investigating agency denies
the request or fails to act upon the request within 15 working days after
receiving the request for reconsideration, the person or facility entitled to a
fair hearing under section 256.045 may submit to the commissioner of human
services or the commissioner of education a written request for a hearing under
that section. Section 256.045 also
governs hearings requested to contest a final determination of the commissioner
of education. For reports involving
maltreatment of a child in a facility, an interested person acting on behalf of
the child may request a review by the Child Maltreatment Review Panel under
section 256.022 if the investigating agency denies the request or fails to act
upon the request or if the interested person contests a reconsidered
determination. The investigating agency
shall notify persons who request reconsideration of
their rights under this paragraph. The
request must be submitted in writing to the review panel and a copy sent to the
investigating agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of notice of a denial
of a request for reconsideration or of a reconsidered determination. The request must specifically identify the
aspects of the agency determination with which the person is dissatisfied.
(c) If, as
a result of a reconsideration or review, the investigating agency changes the
final determination of maltreatment, that agency shall notify the parties
specified in subdivisions 10b, 10d, and 10f.
(d) Except
as provided under paragraph (f), if an individual or facility contests the
investigating agency's final determination regarding maltreatment by requesting
a fair hearing under section 256.045, the commissioner of human services shall
assure that the hearing is conducted and a decision is reached within 90 days
of receipt of the request for a hearing.
The time for action on the decision may be extended for as many days as the
hearing is postponed or the record is held open for the benefit of either
party.
(e) Effective
January 1, 2002, If an individual was disqualified under sections 245C.14
and 245C.15, on the basis of a determination of maltreatment, which was serious
or recurring, and the individual has requested reconsideration of the
maltreatment determination under paragraph (a) and requested reconsideration of
the disqualification under sections 245C.21 to 245C.27, reconsideration of the
maltreatment determination and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be
consolidated into a single reconsideration.
If reconsideration of the maltreatment determination is denied or the
disqualification is not set aside rescinded under sections
245C.21 to 245C.27, the individual may request a fair hearing under section
256.045. If an individual requests a
fair hearing on the maltreatment determination and the disqualification, the
scope of the fair hearing shall include both the maltreatment determination and
the disqualification.
(f) Effective
January 1, 2002, If a maltreatment determination or a disqualification
based on serious or recurring maltreatment is the basis for a denial of a
license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section 245A.07,
the license holder has the right to a contested case hearing under chapter 14
and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to 1400.8612. As provided for under section 245A.08,
subdivision 2a, the scope of the contested case hearing shall include the
maltreatment determination, disqualification, and licensing sanction or denial
of a license. In such cases, a fair
hearing regarding the maltreatment determination and disqualification shall not
be conducted under section 256.045. Except
for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment
determination as provided under this subdivision, and reconsideration of a
disqualification as provided under section 245C.22, shall also not be conducted
when:
(1) a
denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a licensing sanction under section
245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is responsible for
maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder based on serious or
recurring maltreatment;
(2) the
denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the
maltreatment determination or disqualification; and
(3) the
license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, and
denial of a license or licensing sanction.
Notwithstanding
clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment
determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license
or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination
shall be conducted under sections 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557,
subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted
under section 245C.22. In such cases, a
fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27,
626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.
If
the disqualified subject is an individual other than the license holder and
upon whom a background study must be conducted under chapter 245C, the hearings
of all parties may be consolidated into a single contested case hearing upon
consent of all parties and the administrative law judge.
(g) For
purposes of this subdivision, "interested person acting on behalf of the
child" means a parent or legal guardian; stepparent; grandparent; guardian
ad litem; adult stepbrother, stepsister, or sibling; or adult aunt or uncle;
unless the person has been determined to be the perpetrator of the
maltreatment.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 626.557,
subdivision 9d, is amended to read:
Subd. 9d. Administrative
reconsideration; review panel. (a)
Except as provided under paragraph (e), any individual or facility which a lead
agency determines has maltreated a vulnerable adult, or the vulnerable adult or
an interested person acting on behalf of the vulnerable adult, regardless of the
lead agency's determination, who contests the lead agency's final disposition
of an allegation of maltreatment, may request the lead agency to reconsider its
final disposition. The request for
reconsideration must be submitted in writing to the lead agency within 15
calendar days after receipt of notice of final disposition or, if the request
is made by an interested person who is not entitled to notice, within 15 days
after receipt of the notice by the vulnerable adult or the vulnerable adult's
legal guardian. If mailed, the request
for reconsideration must be postmarked and sent to the lead agency within 15
calendar days of the individual's or facility's receipt of the final
disposition. If the request for
reconsideration is made by personal service, it must be received by the lead
agency within 15 calendar days of the individual's or facility's receipt of the
final disposition. An individual who was
determined to have maltreated a vulnerable adult under this section and who was
disqualified on the basis of serious or recurring maltreatment under sections
245C.14 and 245C.15, may request reconsideration of the maltreatment
determination and the disqualification. The
request for reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the
disqualification must be submitted in writing within 30 calendar days of the
individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification under sections 245C.16
and 245C.17. If mailed, the request for
reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and the disqualification must
be postmarked and sent to the lead agency within 30 calendar days of the
individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification. If the request for reconsideration is made by
personal service, it must be received by the lead agency within 30 calendar
days after the individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.
(b) Except
as provided under paragraphs (e) and (f), if the lead agency denies the request
or fails to act upon the request within 15 working days after receiving the
request for reconsideration, the person or facility entitled to a fair hearing
under section 256.045, may submit to the commissioner of human services a
written request for a hearing under that statute. The vulnerable adult, or an interested person
acting on behalf of the vulnerable adult, may request a review by the
Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Review Panel under section 256.021 if the lead
agency denies the request or fails to act upon the request, or if the
vulnerable adult or interested person contests a reconsidered disposition. The lead agency shall notify persons who
request reconsideration of their rights under this paragraph. The request must be submitted in writing to
the review panel and a copy sent to the lead agency within 30 calendar days of
receipt of notice of a denial of a request for reconsideration or of a
reconsidered disposition. The request
must specifically identify the aspects of the agency determination with which
the person is dissatisfied.
(c) If, as a
result of a reconsideration or review, the lead agency changes the final
disposition, it shall notify the parties specified in subdivision 9c, paragraph
(d).
(d) For
purposes of this subdivision, "interested person acting on behalf of the
vulnerable adult" means a person designated in writing by the vulnerable
adult to act on behalf of the vulnerable adult, or a legal guardian or
conservator or other legal representative, a proxy or health care agent
appointed under chapter 145B or 145C, or an individual who is related to the
vulnerable adult, as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 13.
(e) If an
individual was disqualified under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, on the basis of
a determination of maltreatment, which was serious or recurring, and the
individual has requested reconsideration of the maltreatment determination
under paragraph (a) and reconsideration of the disqualification under sections
245C.21 to 245C.27, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination and
requested reconsideration of the disqualification shall be consolidated into a single
reconsideration. If reconsideration of
the maltreatment determination is denied or if the disqualification is not set
aside rescinded under sections 245C.21 to 245C.27, the individual
may request a fair hearing under section 256.045. If an individual requests a fair hearing on
the maltreatment determination and the disqualification, the scope of the fair
hearing shall include both the maltreatment determination and the
disqualification.
(f) If a
maltreatment determination or a disqualification based on serious or recurring
maltreatment is the basis for a denial of a license under section 245A.05 or a
licensing sanction under section 245A.07, the license holder has the right to a
contested case hearing under chapter 14 and Minnesota Rules, parts 1400.8505 to
1400.8612. As provided for under section
245A.08, the scope of the contested case hearing must include the maltreatment
determination, disqualification, and licensing sanction or denial of a license. In such cases, a fair hearing must not be
conducted under section 256.045. Except
for family child care and child foster care, reconsideration of a maltreatment
determination under this subdivision, and reconsideration of a disqualification
under section 245C.22, must not be conducted when:
(1) a
denial of a license under section 245A.05, or a licensing sanction under
section 245A.07, is based on a determination that the license holder is
responsible for maltreatment or the disqualification of a license holder based
on serious or recurring maltreatment;
(2) the
denial of a license or licensing sanction is issued at the same time as the
maltreatment determination or disqualification; and
(3) the
license holder appeals the maltreatment determination or disqualification, and
denial of a license or licensing sanction.
Notwithstanding
clauses (1) to (3), if the license holder appeals the maltreatment
determination or disqualification, but does not appeal the denial of a license
or a licensing sanction, reconsideration of the maltreatment determination
shall be conducted under sections 626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557,
subdivision 9d, and reconsideration of the disqualification shall be conducted
under section 245C.22. In such cases, a
fair hearing shall also be conducted as provided under sections 245C.27,
626.556, subdivision 10i, and 626.557, subdivision 9d.
If the
disqualified subject is an individual other than the license holder and upon
whom a background study must be conducted under chapter 245C, the hearings of
all parties may be consolidated into a single contested case hearing upon
consent of all parties and the administrative law judge.
(g) Until
August 1, 2002, an individual or facility that was determined by the
commissioner of human services or the commissioner of health to be responsible
for neglect under section 626.5572, subdivision 17, after
October 1, 1995, and before August 1, 2001, that believes that the
finding of neglect does not meet an amended definition of neglect may request a
reconsideration of the determination of neglect. The commissioner of human services or the
commissioner of health shall mail a notice to the last known address of
individuals who are eligible to seek this reconsideration. The request for reconsideration must state
how the established findings no longer meet the elements of the definition of
neglect. The commissioner shall review
the request for reconsideration and make a determination within 15 calendar
days. The commissioner's decision on
this reconsideration is the final agency action.
(1) For
purposes of compliance with the data destruction schedule under subdivision
12b, paragraph (d), when a finding of substantiated maltreatment has been
changed as a result of a reconsideration under this paragraph, the date of the
original finding of a substantiated maltreatment must be used to calculate the
destruction date.
(2)
For purposes of any background studies under chapter 245C, when a determination
of substantiated maltreatment has been changed as a result of a reconsideration
under this paragraph, any prior disqualification of the individual under
chapter 245C that was based on this determination of maltreatment shall be
rescinded, and for future background studies under chapter 245C the
commissioner must not use the previous determination of substantiated
maltreatment as a basis for disqualification or as a basis for referring the
individual's maltreatment history to a health-related licensing board under
section 245C.31.
ARTICLE 2
HEALTH CARE
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.291,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of sections 144.291 to
144.298, the following terms have the meanings given.
(a)
"Group purchaser" has the meaning given in section 62J.03,
subdivision 6.
(b)
"Health information exchange" means a legal arrangement between
health care providers and group purchasers to enable and oversee the business
and legal issues involved in the electronic exchange of health records between
the entities for the delivery of patient care.
(c)
"Health record" means any information, whether oral or recorded in
any form or medium, that relates to the past, present, or future physical or
mental health or condition of a patient; the provision of health care to a
patient; or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health
care to a patient.
(d)
"Identifying information" means the patient's name, address, date of
birth, gender, parent's or guardian's name regardless of the age of the
patient, and other nonclinical data which can be used to uniquely identify a
patient.
(e)
"Individually identifiable form" means a form in which the patient is
or can be identified as the subject of the health records.
(f)
"Medical emergency" means medically necessary care which is
immediately needed to preserve life, prevent serious impairment to bodily
functions, organs, or parts, or prevent placing the physical or mental health
of the patient in serious jeopardy.
(g)
"Patient" means a natural person who has received health care
services from a provider for treatment or examination of a medical,
psychiatric, or mental condition, the surviving spouse and parents of a
deceased patient, or a person the patient appoints in writing as a
representative, including a health care agent acting according to chapter 145C,
unless the authority of the agent has been limited by the principal in the
principal's health care directive. Except
for minors who have received health care services under sections 144.341 to
144.347, in the case of a minor, patient includes a parent or guardian, or a
person acting as a parent or guardian in the absence of a parent or guardian.
(h)
"Provider" means:
(1) any
person who furnishes health care services and is regulated to furnish the
services under chapter 147, 147A, 147B, 147C, 147D, 148, 148B, 148C, 148D,
150A, 151, 153, or 153A;
(2) a home
care provider licensed under section 144A.46;
(3) a health care facility
licensed under this chapter or chapter 144A;
(4) a
physician assistant registered under chapter 147A; and
(5) an
unlicensed mental health practitioner regulated under sections 148B.60 to
148B.71.
(i)
"Record locator service" means an electronic index of patient
identifying information that directs providers in a health information exchange
to the location of patient health records held by providers and group
purchasers.
(j)
"Related health care entity" means an affiliate, as defined in section
144.6521, subdivision 3, paragraph (b), of the provider releasing the health
records, including, but not limited to, affiliates of providers
participating in a coordinated care delivery system established under section
256D.031, subdivision 6.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.01, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 30. Review
and evaluation of studies. The
commissioner shall review all published studies, reports, and program
evaluations completed by the Department of Human Services, and those requested
by the legislature but not completed, for state fiscal years 2000 through 2010. For each item, the commissioner shall report
the legislature's original appropriation for that work, if any, and the actual
reported cost of the completed work by the Department of Human Services. The commissioner shall make recommendations
to the legislature about which studies, reports, and program evaluations
required by law are duplicative, unnecessary, or obsolete. The commissioner shall repeat this review
every five fiscal years.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.9657,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Surcharge
on HMOs and community integrated service networks. (a) Effective October 1, 1992, each
health maintenance organization with a certificate of authority issued by the
commissioner of health under chapter 62D and each community integrated service
network licensed by the commissioner under chapter 62N shall pay to the
commissioner of human services a surcharge equal to six-tenths of one percent
of the total premium revenues of the health maintenance organization or
community integrated service network as reported to the commissioner of health
according to the schedule in subdivision 4.
(b) Effective
June 1, 2010: (1) the surcharge under
paragraph (a) is increased to 2.5 percent; and (2) each county-based purchasing
plan authorized under section 256B.692 shall pay to the commissioner a
surcharge equal to 2.5 percent of the total premium revenues of the plan, as
reported to the commissioner of health, according to the payment schedule in
subdivision 4.
(c) For
purposes of this subdivision, total premium revenue means:
(1) premium
revenue recognized on a prepaid basis from individuals and groups for provision
of a specified range of health services over a defined period of time which is
normally one month, excluding premiums paid to a health maintenance
organization or community integrated service network from the Federal Employees
Health Benefit Program;
(2) premiums
from Medicare wrap-around subscribers for health benefits which supplement
Medicare coverage;
(3) Medicare
revenue, as a result of an arrangement between a health maintenance
organization or a community integrated service network and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services of the federal Department of Health and Human
Services, for services to a Medicare beneficiary, excluding Medicare revenue
that states are prohibited from taxing under sections 1854, 1860D-12, and 1876
of title XVIII of the federal Social Security Act, codified as United States
Code, title 42, sections 1395mm, 1395w-112, and 1395w-24, respectively, as they
may be amended from time to time; and
(4)
medical assistance revenue, as a result of an arrangement between a health
maintenance organization or community integrated service network and a Medicaid
state agency, for services to a medical assistance beneficiary.
If advance
payments are made under clause (1) or (2) to the health maintenance organization
or community integrated service network for more than one reporting period, the
portion of the payment that has not yet been earned must be treated as a
liability.
(c) (d) When a
health maintenance organization or community integrated service network merges
or consolidates with or is acquired by another health maintenance organization
or community integrated service network, the surviving corporation or the new
corporation shall be responsible for the annual surcharge originally imposed on
each of the entities or corporations subject to the merger, consolidation, or
acquisition, regardless of whether one of the entities or corporations does not
retain a certificate of authority under chapter 62D or a license under
chapter 62N.
(d) (e) Effective
July 1 of each year, the surviving corporation's or the new corporation's
surcharge shall be based on the revenues earned in the second previous calendar
year by all of the entities or corporations subject to the merger,
consolidation, or acquisition regardless of whether one of the entities or
corporations does not retain a certificate of authority under chapter 62D or a
license under chapter 62N until the total premium revenues of the surviving
corporation include the total premium revenues of all the merged entities as
reported to the commissioner of health.
(e) (f) When a
health maintenance organization or community integrated service network, which
is subject to liability for the surcharge under this chapter, transfers,
assigns, sells, leases, or disposes of all or substantially all of its property
or assets, liability for the surcharge imposed by this chapter is imposed on
the transferee, assignee, or buyer of the health maintenance organization or
community integrated service network.
(f) (g) In the
event a health maintenance organization or community integrated service network
converts its licensure to a different type of entity subject to liability for
the surcharge under this chapter, but survives in the same or substantially
similar form, the surviving entity remains liable for the surcharge regardless
of whether one of the entities or corporations does not retain a certificate of
authority under chapter 62D or a license under chapter 62N.
(g) (h) The
surcharge assessed to a health maintenance organization or community integrated
service network ends when the entity ceases providing services for premiums and
the cessation is not connected with a merger, consolidation, acquisition, or
conversion.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective June 1, 2010.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256.969, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Payments. (a) Acute care hospital billings under
the medical assistance program must not be submitted until the recipient is
discharged. However, the commissioner
shall establish monthly interim payments for inpatient hospitals that have
individual patient lengths of stay over 30 days regardless of diagnostic
category. Except as provided in section
256.9693, medical assistance reimbursement for treatment of mental illness
shall be reimbursed based on diagnostic classifications. Individual hospital payments established
under this section and sections 256.9685, 256.9686, and 256.9695, in addition
to third party and recipient liability, for discharges occurring during the
rate year shall not exceed, in aggregate, the charges for the medical
assistance covered inpatient services paid for the same period of time to the
hospital. This payment limitation shall
be calculated separately for medical assistance and general assistance medical
care services. The limitation on general
assistance medical care shall be effective for admissions occurring on or after
July 1, 1991. Services that have rates
established under subdivision 11 or 12, must be limited separately from other
services. After consulting with the
affected hospitals, the commissioner may consider related hospitals one entity
and may merge the payment rates while maintaining separate provider numbers. The operating and property base rates per
admission or per day shall be derived from the best Medicare and claims data
available when rates are established. The
commissioner shall determine the best Medicare and claims data, taking into
consideration variables of recency of the data, audit disposition, settlement
status, and the ability to set rates in a timely manner. The commissioner shall notify hospitals of
payment rates by December 1 of the year preceding the rate year. The rate setting data must reflect the
admissions data used to establish relative values. Base year changes from 1981 to the base year
established for the rate year beginning January 1, 1991, and for subsequent
rate years, shall not be limited to the limits ending June 30, 1987, on the
maximum rate of increase under subdivision 1.
The commissioner may adjust base year cost, relative value, and case mix
index data to exclude the costs of services that have been discontinued by the
October 1 of the year preceding the rate year or that are paid separately from
inpatient services. Inpatient stays that
encompass portions of two or more rate years shall have payments established
based on payment rates in effect at the time of admission unless the date of
admission preceded the rate year in effect by six months or more. In this case, operating payment rates for
services rendered during the rate year in effect and established based on the
date of admission shall be adjusted to the rate year in effect by the hospital
cost index.
(b) For
fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2002, the total
payment, before third-party liability and spenddown, made to hospitals for
inpatient services is reduced by .5 percent from the current statutory rates.
(c) In
addition to the reduction in paragraph (b), the total payment for
fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2003, made to
hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is
reduced five percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services within diagnosis
related groups 424 to 432, and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are
excluded from this paragraph.
(d) In
addition to the reduction in paragraphs (b) and (c), the total payment for
fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after August 1, 2005, made to
hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is
reduced 6.0 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services within diagnosis
related groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are
excluded from this paragraph. Notwithstanding
section 256.9686, subdivision 7, for purposes of this paragraph, medical
assistance does not include general assistance medical care. Payments made to managed care plans shall be
reduced for services provided on or after January 1, 2006, to reflect this
reduction.
(e) In
addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the total payment
for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2008, through June
30, 2009, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability
and spenddown, is reduced 3.46 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services with diagnosis related
groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from
this paragraph. Payments made to managed
care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after January 1, 2009,
through June 30, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(f) In
addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the total payment
for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2009, through June
30, 2010, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability
and spenddown, is reduced 1.9 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services with diagnosis related
groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from
this paragraph. Payments made to managed
care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after July 1, 2009,
through June 30, 2010, to reflect this reduction.
(g) In
addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the total payment
for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2010, made to
hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is
reduced 1.79 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services with diagnosis related
groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from
this paragraph. Payments made to managed
care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after July 1, 2010, to
reflect this reduction.
(h) In addition to the
reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g), the total payment for
fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2009, made to
hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is
reduced one percent from the current statutory rates. Facilities defined under subdivision 16 are
excluded from this paragraph. Payments
made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after
October 1, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(i) In
addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (g), and (h), the total
payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2011, made
to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown,
is reduced 7.5 percent from the current statutory rates. Facilities defined under subdivision 16 are
excluded from this paragraph. Payments
made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after
January 1, 2012, to reflect this reduction.
Hospitals that, prior to December 31, 2007, received payment to support
the training of residents from an approved graduate medical residency training
program pursuant to United States Code, title 42, section 256e, are not subject
to the provisions of this paragraph.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.04,
subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd. 14. Competitive
bidding. (a) When determined to be
effective, economical, and feasible, the commissioner may utilize volume
purchase through competitive bidding and negotiation under the provisions of
chapter 16C, to provide items under the medical assistance program including
but not limited to the following:
(1)
eyeglasses;
(2) oxygen. The commissioner shall provide for oxygen
needed in an emergency situation on a short-term basis, until the vendor can
obtain the necessary supply from the contract dealer;
(3) hearing
aids and supplies; and
(4) durable
medical equipment, including but not limited to:
(i)
hospital beds;
(ii)
commodes;
(iii)
glide-about chairs;
(iv)
patient lift apparatus;
(v)
wheelchairs and accessories;
(vi) oxygen
administration equipment;
(vii)
respiratory therapy equipment;
(viii) electronic
diagnostic, therapeutic and life-support systems;
(5)
nonemergency medical transportation level of need determinations, disbursement
of public transportation passes and tokens, and volunteer and recipient mileage
and parking reimbursements; and
(6) drugs;
and
(7) medical
supplies.
(b) Rate changes under this
chapter and chapters 256D and 256L do not affect contract payments under this
subdivision unless specifically identified.
(c) The
commissioner may not utilize volume purchase through competitive bidding and
negotiation for special transportation services under the provisions of chapter
16C.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.055, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 15. Adults
without children. Medical assistance
may be paid for a person who is over age 21 and under age 65, who is not
pregnant, and who is not described in subdivision 4, 7, or another subdivision
of this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective upon federal approval and is retroactive from April 1,
2010.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.056,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Income. (a) To be eligible for medical
assistance, a person eligible under section 256B.055 subdivisions 7, 7a,
and 12, may have income up to 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines. Effective January 1, 2000, and each
successive January, recipients of supplemental security income may have an
income up to the supplemental security income standard in effect on that date.
(b) To be
eligible for medical assistance, families and children may have an income up to
133-1/3 percent of the AFDC income standard in effect under the July 16, 1996,
AFDC state plan. Effective July 1, 2000,
the base AFDC standard in effect on July 16, 1996, shall be increased by three
percent.
(c)
Effective July 1, 2002, to be eligible for medical assistance, families and
children may have an income up to 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines
for the family size.
(d) In
computing income to determine eligibility of persons under paragraphs (a) to
(c) and (e) who are not residents of long-term care facilities, the
commissioner shall disregard increases in income as required by Public Law
Numbers 94-566, section 503; 99-272; and 99-509. Veterans aid and attendance benefits and
Veterans Administration unusual medical expense payments are considered income
to the recipient.
(e) To be
eligible for medical assistance, a person eligible under section 256B.055,
subdivision 15, may have income up to 75 percent of the federal poverty
guidelines for family size.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective upon federal approval and is retroactive from April 1,
2010.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Physical
therapy. Medical assistance covers
physical therapy and related services, including specialized maintenance
therapy. Authorization by the
commissioner is required to provide services to a recipient beyond any of the
following onetime service thresholds: (1)
80 units of any approved CPT code other than modalities; (2) 20 modality
sessions; and (3) three evaluations or reevaluations. Services provided by a physical therapy
assistant shall be reimbursed at the same rate as services performed by a
physical therapist when the services of the physical therapy assistant are
provided under the direction of a physical therapist who is on the premises. Services provided by a physical therapy
assistant that are provided under the direction of a physical therapist who is
not on the premises shall be reimbursed at 65 percent of the physical therapist
rate.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 8a, is amended to read:
Subd. 8a. Occupational
therapy. Medical assistance covers
occupational therapy and related services, including specialized maintenance
therapy. Authorization by the
commissioner is required to provide services to a recipient beyond any of the
following onetime service thresholds: (1)
120 units of any combination of approved CPT codes; and (2) two evaluations or
reevaluations. Services provided by
an occupational therapy assistant shall be reimbursed at the same rate as
services performed by an occupational therapist when the services of the occupational
therapy assistant are provided under the direction of the occupational
therapist who is on the premises. Services
provided by an occupational therapy assistant that are provided under the
direction of an occupational therapist who is not on the premises shall be
reimbursed at 65 percent of the occupational therapist rate.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 8b, is amended to read:
Subd. 8b. Speech
language pathology and audiology services.
Medical assistance covers speech language pathology and related
services, including specialized maintenance therapy. Authorization by the commissioner is
required to provide services to a recipient beyond any of the following onetime
service thresholds: (1) 50 treatment
sessions with any combination of approved CPT codes; and (2) one evaluation. Medical assistance covers audiology
services and related services. Services
provided by a person who has been issued a temporary registration under section
148.5161 shall be reimbursed at the same rate as services performed by a speech
language pathologist or audiologist as long as the requirements of section
148.5161, subdivision 3, are met.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8d. Chiropractic
services. Payment for
chiropractic services is limited to one annual evaluation and 12 visits
per year unless prior authorization of a greater number of visits is obtained.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0625, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Dental
services. (a) Medical assistance
covers dental services.
(b) Medical
assistance dental coverage for nonpregnant adults is limited to the following
services:
(1)
comprehensive exams, limited to once every five years;
(2)
periodic exams, limited to one per year;
(3) limited
exams;
(4)
bitewing x-rays, limited to one set per year;
(5)
periapical x-rays;
(6)
panoramic x-rays or full-mouth radiographs, limited to one every five
years, and only if provided in conjunction with a posterior extraction or
scheduled outpatient facility procedure, or as medically necessary for the
diagnosis and follow-up of oral and maxillofacial pathology and trauma. Panoramic x-rays may be taken once every two
years for patients who cannot cooperate for intraoral film due to a
developmental disability or medical condition that does not allow for intraoral
film placement;
(7)
prophylaxis, limited to one per year;
(8)
application of fluoride varnish, limited to one per year;
(9) posterior fillings, all at
the amalgam rate;
(10)
anterior fillings;
(11)
endodontics, limited to root canals on the anterior and premolars only, and
molar root canal therapy as deemed medically necessary for patients that are at
high risk of osteonecrosis from molar extractions;
(12)
removable prostheses, each dental arch limited to one every six years;
including:
(i) relines
of full dentures once every six years per dental arch;
(ii) repair
of acrylic bases of full dentures and acrylic partial dentures, limited to one
per year; and
(iii) adding
a maximum of two denture teeth and two wrought wire clasps per year to partial
dentures per dental arch;
(13) oral
surgery, limited to extractions, biopsies, and incision and drainage of
abscesses;
(14)
palliative treatment and sedative fillings for relief of pain; and
(15)
full-mouth debridement periodontal scaling and root planing,
limited to one every five years; and
(16)
moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia, limited to when
provided by an oral maxillofacial surgeon who is board-certified, or actively
participating in the American Board of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
certification process, when medically necessary to allow the surgical
management of acute oral and maxillofacial pathology which cannot be
accomplished safely with local anesthesia alone and would otherwise require
operating room services.
(c) In
addition to the services specified in paragraph (b), medical assistance covers
the following services for adults, if provided in an outpatient hospital
setting or freestanding ambulatory surgical center as part of outpatient dental
surgery:
(1)
periodontics, limited to periodontal scaling and root planing once every two
years;
(2) general
anesthesia; and
(3)
full-mouth survey once every five two years.
(d) Medical
assistance covers dental services for children that are medically necessary. The following guidelines apply:
(1) posterior
fillings are paid at the amalgam rate;
(2)
application of sealants once every five years per permanent molar; and
(3)
application of fluoride varnish once every six months.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0625, subdivision 13e, is amended to read:
Subd. 13e. Payment
rates. (a) The basis for determining
the amount of payment shall be the lower of the actual acquisition costs of the
drugs plus a fixed dispensing fee; the maximum allowable cost set by the federal
government or by the commissioner plus the fixed dispensing fee; or the usual
and customary price charged to the public.
The amount of payment basis must be reduced to reflect all discount
amounts applied to the charge by any provider/insurer agreement or
contract for submitted charges to medical assistance programs. The net submitted charge may not be greater
than the patient liability for the service.
The pharmacy dispensing fee shall be $3.65, except that the dispensing
fee for intravenous solutions which must be compounded by the pharmacist shall
be $8 per bag, $14 per bag for cancer chemotherapy products, and $30 per bag
for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in one liter quantities, or
$44 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in quantities
greater than one liter. Actual
acquisition cost includes quantity and other special discounts except time and
cash discounts. Effective July 1,
2009 July 1, 2010, the actual acquisition cost of a drug shall be
estimated by the commissioner, at average wholesale price minus 15
12.5 percent or wholesale acquisition cost plus 5.0 percent, whichever
is lower. The actual acquisition
cost of antihemophilic factor drugs shall be estimated at the average wholesale
price minus 30 28.12 percent or wholesale acquisition cost
minus 13.76 percent, whichever is lower.
Average wholesale price is defined as the price for a drug product
listed as the average wholesale price in the commissioner's primary reference
source. Wholesale acquisition cost is
defined as the manufacturer's list price for a drug or biological to
wholesalers or direct purchasers in the United States, not including prompt pay
or other discounts, rebates, or reductions in price, for the most recent month
for which information is available, as reported in wholesale price guides or
other publications of drug or biological pricing data. The maximum allowable cost of a
multisource drug may be set by the commissioner and it shall be comparable to,
but no higher than, the maximum amount paid by other third-party payors in this
state who have maximum allowable cost programs.
Establishment of the amount of payment for drugs shall not be subject to
the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
(b) An additional dispensing
fee of $.30 may be added to the dispensing fee paid to pharmacists for legend
drug prescriptions dispensed to residents of long-term care facilities when a
unit dose blister card system, approved by the department, is used. Under this type of dispensing system, the
pharmacist must dispense a 30-day supply of drug. The National Drug Code (NDC) from the drug
container used to fill the blister card must be identified on the claim to the
department. The unit dose blister card
containing the drug must meet the packaging standards set forth in Minnesota
Rules, part 6800.2700, that govern the return of unused drugs to the pharmacy
for reuse. The pharmacy provider will be
required to credit the department for the actual acquisition cost of all unused
drugs that are eligible for reuse. Over-the-counter
medications must be dispensed in the manufacturer's unopened package. The commissioner may permit the drug
clozapine to be dispensed in a quantity that is less than a 30-day supply.
(c) Whenever a generically
equivalent product is available, payment shall be on the basis of the actual
acquisition cost of the generic drug, or on the maximum allowable cost
established by the commissioner.
(d) The basis for
determining the amount of payment for drugs administered in an outpatient
setting shall be the lower of the usual and customary cost submitted by the
provider or the amount established for Medicare by the United States Department
of Health and Human Services pursuant to title XVIII, section 1847a of the federal
Social Security Act.
(e) The commissioner may
negotiate lower reimbursement rates for specialty pharmacy products than the
rates specified in paragraph (a). The
commissioner may require individuals enrolled in the health care programs
administered by the department to obtain specialty pharmacy products from
providers with whom the commissioner has negotiated lower reimbursement rates. Specialty pharmacy products are defined as
those used by a small number of recipients or recipients with complex and chronic
diseases that require expensive and challenging drug regimens. Examples of these conditions include, but are
not limited to: multiple sclerosis,
HIV/AIDS, transplantation, hepatitis C, growth hormone deficiency, Crohn's
Disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and certain forms of cancer. Specialty pharmaceutical products include
injectable and infusion therapies, biotechnology drugs, high-cost therapies,
and therapies that require complex care.
The commissioner shall consult with the formulary committee to develop a
list of specialty pharmacy products subject to this paragraph. In consulting with the formulary committee in
developing this list, the commissioner shall take into consideration the
population served by specialty pharmacy products, the current delivery system
and standard of care in the state, and access to care issues. The commissioner shall have the discretion to
adjust the reimbursement rate to prevent access to care issues.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010, or upon
federal approval, whichever is later.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 18a, is amended to read:
Subd. 18a. Access
to medical services. (a) Medical
assistance reimbursement for meals for persons traveling to receive medical
care may not exceed $5.50 for breakfast, $6.50 for lunch, or $8 for dinner.
(b) Medical
assistance reimbursement for lodging for persons traveling to receive medical
care may not exceed $50 per day unless prior authorized by the local agency.
(c) Medical
assistance direct mileage reimbursement to the eligible person or the eligible
person's driver may not exceed 20 cents per mile.
(d)
Regardless of the number of employees that an enrolled health care provider may
have, medical assistance covers sign and oral language interpreter services
when provided by an enrolled health care provider during the course of
providing a direct, person-to-person covered health care service to an enrolled
recipient with limited English proficiency or who has a hearing loss and uses
interpreting services. Coverage for
oral language interpreter services shall be provided only if the oral language
interpreter used by the enrolled health care provider is listed in the registry
or roster established under section 144.058.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 31, is amended to read:
Subd. 31. Medical
supplies and equipment. Medical
assistance covers medical supplies and equipment. Separate payment outside of the facility's
payment rate shall be made for wheelchairs and wheelchair accessories for
recipients who are residents of intermediate care facilities for the
developmentally disabled. Reimbursement
for wheelchairs and wheelchair accessories for ICF/MR recipients shall be
subject to the same conditions and limitations as coverage for recipients who
do not reside in institutions. A
wheelchair purchased outside of the facility's payment rate is the property of
the recipient. The commissioner may
set reimbursement rates for specified categories of medical supplies at levels
below the Medicare payment rate.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 54. Services
provided in birth centers. (a)
Medical assistance covers services provided in a birth center licensed under
section 144.615 by a licensed health professional if the service would
otherwise be covered if provided in a hospital.
(b)
Facility services provided by a birth center shall be paid at the lower of
billed charges or 70 percent of the statewide average for a facility payment
rate made to a hospital for an uncomplicated vaginal birth as determined using
the most recent calendar year for which complete claims data is available. If a recipient is transported from a birth
center to a hospital prior to the delivery, the payment for facility services
to the birth center shall be the lower of billed charges or 15 percent of the
average facility payment made to a hospital for the services provided for an
uncomplicated vaginal delivery as determined using the most recent calendar
year for which complete claims data is available.
(c)
Professional services provided by traditional midwives licensed under chapter 147D
shall be paid at the lower of billed charges or 100 percent of the rate paid to
a physician performing the same services.
If a recipient is transported from a birth center to a hospital prior to
the delivery, a licensed traditional midwife who does not perform the delivery
may not bill for any delivery services. Services
are not covered if provided by an unlicensed traditional midwife.
(d) The commissioner shall
apply for any necessary waivers from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services to allow birth centers and birth center providers to be reimbursed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective January 1, 2011, or upon federal approval, whichever is
later.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0631,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Co-payments. (a) Except as provided in subdivision 2,
the medical assistance benefit plan shall include the following co-payments for
all recipients, effective for services provided on or after October 1, 2003,
and before January 1, 2009:
(1) $3 per
nonpreventive visit. For purposes of
this subdivision, a visit means an episode of service which is required because
of a recipient's symptoms, diagnosis, or established illness, and which is
delivered in an ambulatory setting by a physician or physician ancillary,
chiropractor, podiatrist, nurse midwife, advanced practice nurse, audiologist,
optician, or optometrist;
(2) $3 for
eyeglasses;
(3) $6 for
nonemergency visits to a hospital-based emergency room; and
(4) $3 per
brand-name drug prescription and $1 per generic drug prescription, subject to a
$12 per month maximum for prescription drug co-payments. No co-payments shall apply to antipsychotic
drugs when used for the treatment of mental illness.
(b) Except
as provided in subdivision 2, the medical assistance benefit plan shall include
the following co-payments for all recipients, effective for services provided
on or after January 1, 2009:
(1) $6
$3.50 for nonemergency visits to a hospital-based emergency room;
(2) $3 per
brand-name drug prescription and $1 per generic drug prescription, subject to a
$7 $12 per month maximum for prescription drug co-payments. No co-payments shall apply to antipsychotic
drugs when used for the treatment of mental illness; and
(3) for
individuals identified by the commissioner with income at or below 100 percent
of the federal poverty guidelines, total monthly co-payments must not exceed
five percent of family income. For
purposes of this paragraph, family income is the total earned and unearned
income of the individual and the individual's spouse, if the spouse is enrolled
in medical assistance and also subject to the five percent limit on
co-payments.
(c)
Recipients of medical assistance are responsible for all co-payments in this subdivision.
EFFECTIVE DATE. The
amendment to paragraph (b), clause (1), related to the co-payment for
nonemergency visits is effective January 1, 2011, and the amendment to
paragraph (b), clause (2), related to the per month maximum for prescription
drug co-payments is effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0631,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Collection. (a) The medical assistance reimbursement
to the provider shall be reduced by the amount of the co-payment, except that
reimbursements shall not be reduced:
(1) once a
recipient has reached the $12 per month maximum or the $7 per month maximum
effective January 1, 2009, for prescription drug co-payments; or
(2) for a recipient identified
by the commissioner under 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines who has
met their monthly five percent co-payment limit.
(b) The
provider collects the co-payment from the recipient. Providers may not deny services to recipients
who are unable to pay the co-payment.
(c) Medical
assistance reimbursement to fee-for-service providers and payments to managed
care plans shall not be increased as a result of the removal of the
co-payments effective on or after January 1, 2009.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0644,
as amended by Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 6, is amended to read:
256B.0644 REIMBURSEMENT UNDER OTHER STATE HEALTH CARE
PROGRAMS.
(a) A vendor
of medical care, as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 7, and a health
maintenance organization, as defined in chapter 62D, must participate as a
provider or contractor in the medical assistance program, general assistance
medical care program, and MinnesotaCare as a condition of participating as a
provider in health insurance plans and programs or contractor for state
employees established under section 43A.18, the public employees insurance
program under section 43A.316, for health insurance plans offered to local
statutory or home rule charter city, county, and school district employees, the
workers' compensation system under section 176.135, and insurance plans
provided through the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association under sections
62E.01 to 62E.19. The limitations on
insurance plans offered to local government employees shall not be applicable
in geographic areas where provider participation is limited by managed care
contracts with the Department of Human Services.
(b) For
providers other than health maintenance organizations, participation in the
medical assistance program means that:
(1) the
provider accepts new medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and
MinnesotaCare patients;
(2) for
providers other than dental service providers, at least 20 percent of the
provider's patients are covered by medical assistance, general assistance
medical care, and MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage; or
(3) for
dental service providers, at least ten percent of the provider's patients are
covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and
MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage, or the provider accepts new
medical assistance and MinnesotaCare patients who are children with special
health care needs. For purposes of this
section, "children with special health care needs" means children up
to age 18 who: (i) require health and
related services beyond that required by children generally; and (ii) have or
are at risk for a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional
condition, including: bleeding and
coagulation disorders; immunodeficiency disorders; cancer; endocrinopathy;
developmental disabilities; epilepsy, cerebral palsy, and other neurological
diseases; visual impairment or deafness; Down syndrome and other genetic
disorders; autism; fetal alcohol syndrome; and other conditions designated by
the commissioner after consultation with representatives of pediatric dental
providers and consumers.
(c) Patients
seen on a volunteer basis by the provider at a location other than the
provider's usual place of practice may be considered in meeting the
participation requirement in this section.
The commissioner shall establish participation requirements for health
maintenance organizations. The
commissioner shall provide lists of participating medical assistance providers
on a quarterly basis to the commissioner of management and budget, the
commissioner of labor and industry, and the commissioner of commerce. Each of the commissioners shall develop and
implement procedures to exclude as participating providers in the program or
programs under their jurisdiction those providers who do not participate in the
medical assistance program. The
commissioner of management and budget shall implement this section through
contracts with participating health and dental carriers.
(d) Any hospital or other
provider that is participating in a coordinated care delivery system under
section 256D.031, subdivision 6, or receives payments from the uncompensated
care pool under section 256D.031, subdivision 8, shall not refuse to provide
services to any patient enrolled in general assistance medical care regardless
of the availability or the amount of payment.
(e) (d) For
purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b), participation in the general assistance
medical care program applies only to pharmacy providers dispensing
prescription drugs according to section 256D.03, subdivision 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE. The
amendment striking the existing paragraph (d) is effective 30 days after
federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes,
sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1,
2011, whichever is later. The amendment
to the new paragraph (d) is effective June 1, 2010.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0653, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Home
care therapies. (a) Home care
therapies include the following: physical
therapy, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and speech and language
pathology therapy services.
(b) Home
care therapies must be:
(1) provided
in the recipient's residence after it has been determined the recipient is
unable to access outpatient therapy;
(2)
prescribed, ordered, or referred by a physician and documented in a plan of
care and reviewed, according to Minnesota Rules, part 9505.0390;
(3) assessed
by an appropriate therapist; and
(4) provided
by a Medicare-certified home health agency enrolled as a Medicaid provider
agency.
(c)
Restorative and specialized maintenance therapies must be provided
according to Minnesota Rules, part 9505.0390.
Physical and occupational therapy assistants may be used as allowed
under Minnesota Rules, part 9505.0390, subpart 1, item B.
(d) For both
physical and occupational therapies, the therapist and the therapist's
assistant may not both bill for services provided to a recipient on the same
day.
Sec. 21. [256B.0755]
PAYMENT REFORM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOR SPECIAL PATIENT POPULATIONS.
Subdivision
1. Demonstration project. (a)
The commissioner of human services, in consultation with the commissioner of
health, shall establish a payment reform demonstration project implementing an
alternative payment system for health care providers serving an identified
group of patients who are enrolled in a state health care program, and are
either high utilizers of high-cost health care services or have characteristics
that put them at high risk of becoming high utilizers. The purpose of the demonstration project is
to implement and evaluate methods of reducing hospitalizations, emergency room
use, high-cost medications and specialty services, admissions to nursing
facilities, or use of long-term home and community-based services, in order to
reduce the total cost of care and services for the patients.
(b) The
commissioner shall give the highest priority to projects that will serve
patients who have chronic medical conditions or complex medical needs that are
complicated by a physical disability, serious mental illness, or serious
socioeconomic factors such as poverty, homelessness, or language or cultural
barriers. The commissioner shall also
give the highest priority to providers or groups of providers who have the highest
concentrations of patients with these characteristics.
(c) The commissioner must
implement this payment reform demonstration project in a manner consistent with
the payment reform initiative provided in sections 62U.02 to 62U.04.
(d) For purposes
of this section, "state health care program" means the medical
assistance, MinnesotaCare, and general assistance medical care programs.
Subd. 2. Participation. (a) The commissioner shall request
eligible providers or groups of providers to submit a proposal to participate
in the demonstration project by September 1, 2010. The providers who are interested in
participating shall negotiate with the commissioner to determine:
(1) the
identified group of patients who are to be enrolled in the program;
(2) the
services that are to be included in the total cost of care calculation;
(3) the
methodology for calculating the total cost of care, which may take into
consideration the impact on costs to other state or local government programs
including, but not limited to, social services and income maintenance programs;
(4) the
time period to be covered under the bid;
(5) the
implementation of a risk adjustment mechanism to adjust for factors that are
beyond the control of the provider including nonclinical factors that will
affect the cost or outcomes of treatment;
(6) the
payment reforms and payment methods to be used under the project, which may
include but are not limited to adjustments in fee-for-service payments, payment
of care coordination fees, payments for start-up and implementation costs to be
recovered or repaid later in the project, payments adjusted based on a
provider's proportion of patients who are enrolled in state health care
programs; payments adjusted for the clinical or socioeconomic complexity of the
patients served, payment incentives tied to use of inpatient and emergency room
services, and periodic settle-up adjustments;
(7) methods
of sharing financial risk and benefit between the commissioner and the provider
or groups of providers, which may include but are not limited to stop-loss
arrangements to cover high-cost outlier cases or costs that are beyond the
control of the provider, and risk-sharing and benefit-sharing corridors; and
(8)
performance and outcome benchmarks to be used to measure performance,
achievement of cost-savings targets, and quality of care provided.
(b) A
provider or group of providers may submit a proposal for a demonstration
project in partnership with a health maintenance organization or county-based
purchasing plan for the purposes of sharing risk, claims processing, or
administration of the project, or to extend participation in the project to
persons who are enrolled in prepaid health care programs.
Subd. 3. Total
cost of care agreement. Based
on negotiations, the commissioner must enter into an agreement with interested
and eligible providers or groups of providers to implement projects that are
designed to reduce the total cost of care for the identified patients. To the extent possible, the projects shall
begin implementation on January 1, 2011, or upon federal approval, whichever is
later.
Subd. 4. Eligibility. To be eligible to participate,
providers or groups of providers must meet certification standards for health
care homes established by the Department of Health and the Department of Human
Services under section 256B.0751.
Subd. 5.
Subd. 6. Cost
neutrality. The total cost, including
administrative costs, of this demonstration project must not exceed the costs
that would otherwise be incurred by the state had services to the state health
care program enrollees participating in the demonstration project been
provided, as applicable for the enrollee, under fee-for-service or through
managed care or county-based purchasing plans.
Sec. 22. [256B.0757]
INTENSIVE CARE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
Subdivision
1. Report. The
commissioner shall review medical assistance enrollment and by July 1, 2011,
present a report to the legislature that describes the common characteristics
and costs of those enrollees age 18 and over whose annual medical costs are
greater than 95 percent of all other enrollees, using deidentified data.
Subd. 2. Intensive
care management system established. The
commissioner shall implement, by January 1, 2012, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later, a program to provide intensive care management to
medical assistance enrollees age 18 and over currently served under
fee-for-service, managed care, or county-based purchasing, whose annual medical
care costs are in the top five percent of all medical assistance enrollees. The intensive care management program must
reduce these enrollees' medical assistance costs by at least 20 percent on
average, improve quality of care through care coordination, and provide
financial incentives for providers to deliver care efficiently. The commissioner may require medical
assistance enrollees meeting the criteria specified in this subdivision to
participate in the intensive care management program, and may reassign
enrollees from existing managed care and county-based purchasing plans to those
plans that are participating in the demonstration program. The commissioner shall seek all federal
approvals and waivers necessary to implement the intensive care management
program.
Subd. 3. Request
for proposals. The
commissioner of human services shall request proposals by
September 1, 2011, or upon federal approval, whichever is later, from
health care providers, managed care plans, and county-based purchasing plans to
provide intensive care management services under the requirements of
subdivision 1. Proposals submitted must:
(1)
designate the medical assistance population and geographic area of the state to
be served;
(2)
describe in detail the proposed intensive care management program;
(3) provide
estimates of cost savings to the state and the evidence supporting these
estimates;
(4)
describe the extent to which the intensive care management program is
consistent with and builds upon current state health care home, care
coordination, and payment reform initiatives; and
(5) meet
quality assurance, data reporting, and other criteria specified by the
commissioner in the request for proposals.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5k. Payment
rate modification. For services
rendered on or after August 1, 2010, the total payment made to managed care and
county-based purchasing plans under the medical assistance program and under
MinnesotaCare for families with children shall be increased by 1.4 percent.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective August 1, 2010.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5l. Payment
reduction. For services
rendered on or after January 1, 2011, the total payment made to managed care
plans for providing covered services under the medical assistance, general
assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare programs is reduced by one percent
from their current statutory rates. This
provision excludes payments for nursing home services, home and community-based
waivers, home care services covered under section 256B.0651, subdivision 2,
payments to demonstration projects for persons with disabilities, and mental
health services added as covered benefits after December 31, 2007.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69,
subdivision 20, as amended by Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 10, is
amended to read:
Subd. 20. Ombudsperson. (a) The commissioner shall
designate an ombudsperson to advocate for persons required to enroll in prepaid
health plans under this section. The
ombudsperson shall advocate for recipients enrolled in prepaid health plans
through complaint and appeal procedures and ensure that necessary medical
services are provided either by the prepaid health plan directly or by referral
to appropriate social services. At the
time of enrollment in a prepaid health plan, the local agency shall inform
recipients about the ombudsperson program and their right to a resolution of a
complaint by the prepaid health plan if they experience a problem with the plan
or its providers.
(b) The
commissioner shall designate an ombudsperson to advocate for persons enrolled
in a care coordination delivery system under section 256D.031. The ombudsperson shall advocate for
recipients enrolled in a care coordination delivery system through the state
appeal process and assist enrollees in accessing necessary medical services
through the care coordination delivery systems directly or by referral to
appropriate services. At the time of
enrollment in a care coordination delivery system, the local agency shall
inform recipients about the ombudsperson program.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this
article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056,
subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69,
subdivision 27, is amended to read:
Subd. 27. Information
for persons with limited English-language proficiency. Managed care contracts entered into under
this section and sections 256D.03, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), and section
256L.12 must require demonstration providers to provide language assistance
to enrollees that ensures meaningful access to its programs and services
according to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and federal regulations adopted
under that law or any guidance from the United States Department of Health and
Human Services.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective retroactively from April 1, 2010.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.692,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. In
general. County boards or groups of
county boards may elect to purchase or provide health care services on behalf
of persons eligible for medical assistance and general assistance medical
care who would otherwise be required to or may elect to participate in the
prepaid medical assistance or prepaid general assistance medical care
programs according to sections section 256B.69 and 256D.03. Counties that elect to purchase or provide
health care under this section must provide all services included in prepaid
managed care programs according to sections section 256B.69,
subdivisions 1 to 22, and 256D.03.
County-based purchasing under this section is governed by section
256B.69, unless otherwise provided for under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective retroactively from April 1, 2010.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.75, is
amended to read:
256B.75 HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT REIMBURSEMENT.
(a) For
outpatient hospital facility fee payments for services rendered on or after
October 1, 1992, the commissioner of human services shall pay the lower of (1)
submitted charge, or (2) 32 percent above the rate in effect on June 30, 1992,
except for those services for which there is a federal maximum allowable
payment. Effective for services rendered
on or after January 1, 2000, payment rates for nonsurgical outpatient hospital
facility fees and emergency room facility fees shall be increased by eight
percent over the rates in effect on December 31, 1999, except for those
services for which there is a federal maximum allowable payment. Services for which there is a federal maximum
allowable payment shall be paid at the lower of (1) submitted charge, or (2)
the federal maximum allowable payment. Total
aggregate payment for outpatient hospital facility fee services shall not
exceed the Medicare upper limit. If it
is determined that a provision of this section conflicts with existing or
future requirements of the United States government with respect to federal
financial participation in medical assistance, the federal requirements prevail. The commissioner may, in the aggregate,
prospectively reduce payment rates to avoid reduced federal financial
participation resulting from rates that are in excess of the Medicare upper
limitations.
(b) Notwithstanding
paragraph (a), payment for outpatient, emergency, and ambulatory surgery
hospital facility fee services for critical access hospitals designated under
section 144.1483, clause (10), shall be paid on a cost-based payment system
that is based on the cost-finding methods and allowable costs of the Medicare
program.
(c)
Effective for services provided on or after July 1, 2003, rates that are based
on the Medicare outpatient prospective payment system shall be replaced by a
budget neutral prospective payment system that is derived using medical
assistance data. The commissioner shall
provide a proposal to the 2003 legislature to define and implement this
provision.
(d) For
fee-for-service services provided on or after July 1, 2002, the total payment, before
third-party liability and spenddown, made to hospitals for outpatient hospital
facility services is reduced by .5 percent from the current statutory rate.
(e) In
addition to the reduction in paragraph (d), the total payment for
fee-for-service services provided on or after July 1, 2003, made to hospitals
for outpatient hospital facility services before third-party liability and
spenddown, is reduced five percent from the current statutory rates. Facilities defined under section 256.969,
subdivision 16, are excluded from this paragraph.
(f) In
addition to the reductions in paragraphs (d) and (e), the total payment for
fee-for-service services provided on or after July 1, 2008, made to hospitals
for outpatient hospital facility services before third-party liability and
spenddown, is reduced three percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services and facilities defined
under section 256.969, subdivision 16, are excluded from this paragraph.
(g) Notwithstanding any
contrary provision in this section, payment for all outpatient and emergency
services provided by any hospital that, prior to December 31, 2007, has
received payment to support the training of residents from an approved graduate
medical residency training program under United States Code, title 42, section
256e, must be paid for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 an additional $7,000,000. Payment rates for subsequent fiscal years are
as follows:
(1) 2014: 50 percent of costs;
(2) 2015: 60 percent of costs;
(3) 2016: 70 percent of costs;
(4) 2017: 80 percent of costs;
(5) 2018: 90 percent of costs; and
(6) 2019 and
thereafter: 100 percent of costs.
Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.76, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Physician
reimbursement. (a) Effective for
services rendered on or after October 1, 1992, the commissioner shall make
payments for physician services as follows:
(1) payment
for level one Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' common procedural
coding system codes titled "office and other outpatient services,"
"preventive medicine new and established patient," "delivery,
antepartum, and postpartum care," "critical care," cesarean
delivery and pharmacologic management provided to psychiatric patients, and
level three codes for enhanced services for prenatal high risk, shall be paid
at the lower of (i) submitted charges, or (ii) 25 percent above the rate in
effect on June 30, 1992. If the rate on
any procedure code within these categories is different than the rate that
would have been paid under the methodology in section 256B.74, subdivision 2,
then the larger rate shall be paid;
(2) payments
for all other services shall be paid at the lower of (i) submitted charges, or
(ii) 15.4 percent above the rate in effect on June 30, 1992; and
(3) all
physician rates shall be converted from the 50th percentile of 1982 to the 50th
percentile of 1989, less the percent in aggregate necessary to equal the above
increases except that payment rates for home health agency services shall be
the rates in effect on September 30, 1992.
(b)
Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2000, payment rates for
physician and professional services shall be increased by three percent over
the rates in effect on December 31, 1999, except for home health agency and
family planning agency services. The
increases in this paragraph shall be implemented January 1, 2000, for managed
care.
(c)
Effective for services rendered on or after July 1, 2009, payment rates for
physician and professional services shall be reduced by five percent over the
rates in effect on June 30, 2009. This
reduction does not apply to office or other outpatient visits, preventive
medicine visits and family planning visits billed by physicians, advanced
practice nurses, or physician assistants in a family planning agency or in one
of the following primary care practices:
general practice, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, general
geriatrics, and family medicine. This
reduction does not apply to federally qualified health centers, rural health
centers, and Indian health services. This
reduction does not apply to physical therapy services, occupational therapy
services, and speech pathology and related services provided on or after July
1, 2010. Effective October 1, 2009,
payments made to managed care plans and county-based purchasing plans under
sections 256B.69, 256B.692, and 256L.12 shall reflect the payment reduction
described in this paragraph.
(d) Effective for services rendered
on or after July 1, 2010, payment rates for physician and professional services
shall be reduced by three percent over the rates in effect on June 30, 2010. This reduction does not apply to those
providers and entities exempt from the reduction in paragraph (c). Effective October 1, 2010, payments made to
managed care plans and county-based purchasing plans under sections 256B.69,
256B.692, and 256L.12 shall reflect the payment reductions in this paragraph.
(e)
Effective for services rendered on or after June 1, 2010, payment rates for
physician and professional services billed by physicians employed by and
clinics that are owned by a nonprofit health maintenance organization shall be
increased by 15 percent. Effective
October 1, 2010, payments to managed care and county-based purchasing plans
under sections 256B.69, 256B.692, and 256L.12 shall reflect the payment
increase described in this paragraph.
Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.76,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Dental
reimbursement. (a) Effective for
services rendered on or after October 1, 1992, the commissioner shall make
payments for dental services as follows:
(1) dental
services shall be paid at the lower of (i) submitted charges, or (ii) 25
percent above the rate in effect on June 30, 1992; and
(2) dental
rates shall be converted from the 50th percentile of 1982 to the 50th
percentile of 1989, less the percent in aggregate necessary to equal the above
increases.
(b)
Beginning October 1, 1999, the payment for tooth sealants and fluoride treatments
shall be the lower of (1) submitted charge, or (2) 80 percent of median
1997 charges.
(c)
Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2000, payment rates for
dental services shall be increased by three percent over the rates in effect on
December 31, 1999.
(d)
Effective for services provided on or after January 1, 2002, payment for
diagnostic examinations and dental x-rays provided to children under age 21
shall be the lower of (1) the submitted charge, or (2) 85 percent of median
1999 charges.
(e) The
increases listed in paragraphs (b) and (c) shall be implemented January 1,
2000, for managed care.
(f)
Effective for dental services rendered on or after October 1, 2010, by a
state-operated dental clinic, payment shall be paid on a cost-based payment
system that is based on the cost-finding methods and allowable costs of the
Medicare program. For services performed
by a state-operated dental clinic pursuant to a contract between the clinic and
a managed care plan or a county-based purchasing plan, a supplemental payment
shall be made to the clinic by the commissioner that is equal to the amount by
which the amount determined under this paragraph exceeds the amount of the
payments provided under the contract. Managed
care plans and county-based purchasing plans participating in medical
assistance must provide to the commissioner any expenditure, cost, and revenue
information deemed necessary by the commissioner for purposes of obtaining
federal Medicaid matching funds for cost-based reimbursement for state-operated
dental clinics. Cost-based reimbursement
shall be implemented in managed care contracts beginning January 1, 2011.
(g)
Beginning in fiscal year 2011, if the payments to state-operated dental clinics
in paragraph (f), including state and federal shares, are less than $1,850,000
per fiscal year, a supplemental state payment equal to the difference between
the total payments in paragraph (f) and $1,850,000 shall be paid from the
general fund to state-operated services for the operation of the dental
clinics.
Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.76,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Critical
access dental providers. Effective
for dental services rendered on or after January 1, 2002, the commissioner
shall increase reimbursements to dentists and dental clinics deemed by the
commissioner to be critical access dental providers. For dental services rendered on or after July
1, 2007, the commissioner shall increase reimbursement by 30 percent above the
reimbursement rate that would otherwise be paid to the critical access dental
provider. The commissioner shall pay the
health plan companies in amounts sufficient to reflect increased reimbursements
to critical access dental providers as approved by the commissioner. In determining which dentists and dental
clinics shall be deemed critical access dental providers, the commissioner
shall review:
(1) the
utilization rate in the service area in which the dentist or dental clinic
operates for dental services to patients covered by medical assistance, general
assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage;
(2) the
level of services provided by the dentist or dental clinic to patients covered
by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare as
their primary source of coverage; and. The commissioner shall pay critical access
dental provider payments to a dentist or dental clinic that meets any one of
the following criteria:
(i) at
least 40 percent of patient encounters are with patients who are uninsured or
covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or
MinnesotaCare;
(ii) the
dental clinic or dental group is owned and operated by a nonprofit operation
under chapter 317A with more than 10,000 patient encounters per year with
patients who are uninsured or covered by medical assistance, general assistance
medical care, or MinnesotaCare;
(iii) the
dental clinic is associated with an oral health or dental education program
operated by the University of Minnesota or an institution within the Minnesota
State Colleges and Universities system; or
(iv) the
dental clinic is a state-operated dental clinic;
(3) whether
the level of services provided by the dentist or dental clinic is critical to
maintaining adequate levels of patient access within the a geographic
service area, and to ensure that the maximum travel distance or travel time
is the lesser of 60 miles or 60 minutes;
(4) whether
the provider has completed the application for critical access dental provider
designation by the due date, and has provided correct information;
(5) whether
the dentist or dental clinic meets the quality and continuity of care criteria
recommended by the dental services advisory committee and adopted by the
department; and
(6) whether
the dentist or dental clinic serves people in all Minnesota health care
programs.
In the
absence of a critical access dental provider in a service area, the
commissioner may designate a dentist or dental clinic as a critical access
dental provider if the dentist or dental clinic is willing to provide care to
patients covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare
at a level which significantly increases access to dental care in the service
area.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective January 1, 2011.
Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.76, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. Designation
and termination of critical access dental providers. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions in
subdivision 4, the commissioner may review and not designate an individual
dentist or dental clinic as a critical access dental provider under subdivision
4 or section 256L.11, subdivision 7, when the dentist or clinic:
(1) has been
subject to a corrective or disciplinary action by the Board of Dentistry
related to fraud or direct patient care.
Designation shall not be made until the provider is no longer subject to
a corrective or disciplinary action related to fraud or direct patient care; or
(2) has been
subject, within the past three years, to a postinvestigation action by the
commissioner of human services or issuance of a warning as specified in
Minnesota Rules, parts 9505.2160 to 9505.2245.
The provider shall not be considered for critical access dental
designation until the January following the year in which the action has ended.
(b) The
commissioner may terminate a critical access designation of an individual
dentist or clinic if the dentist or clinic:
(1) becomes
subject to a disciplinary or corrective action by the Board of Dentistry
related to fraud or direct patient care.
The provider shall not be considered for critical access designation
until the January following the year in which the action has ended;
(2) becomes
subject to a postinvestigation action by the commissioner of human services or
issuance of a warning as specified in Minnesota Rules, parts 9505.2160 to 9505.2245;
(3) does not
meet the quality and continuity of care criteria that have been recommended by
the Dental Services Advisory Committee and adopted by the department; or
(4) does not
serve people in all Minnesota public health care programs.
(c) Any
termination is effective on the date of notification of the:
(1)
postinvestigative action;
(2)
disciplinary or corrective action by the Minnesota Board of Dentistry; or
(3)
determination of not meeting quality and continuity of care criteria.
The
commissioner may review postinvestigative actions taken by a health plan under
contract to provide dental services to Minnesota health care program enrollees. After an investigation conducted by the
Department of Human Services surveillance unit, the findings of the health plan
may be incorporated to determine if a provider will be designated or terminated
from the program.
(d) A
provider who has been terminated or not designated under this section may
appeal only through the contested hearing process as defined in section 14.02,
subdivision 3, by filing with the commissioner a written request of appeal. The appeal request must be received by the
commissioner no later than 30 days after notification of termination or
nondesignation.
(e) The
commissioner may make an exception to paragraphs (a) and (b) if an action taken
by the Board of Dentistry or the commissioner is the result of events not
directly related to patient care or that will not affect direct patient care to
Minnesota health care program enrollees.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.766, is amended to read:
256B.766 REIMBURSEMENT FOR BASIC CARE SERVICES.
(a) Effective
for services provided on or after July 1, 2009, total payments for basic care
services, shall be reduced by three percent, prior to third-party liability and
spenddown calculation. This reduction
applies to physical therapy services, occupational therapy services, and speech
language pathology and related services provided on or after July 1, 2010. Effective July 1, 2010, the commissioner
shall classify physical therapy services, occupational therapy services, and
speech language pathology and related services as basic care services. Payments made to managed care plans and
county-based purchasing plans shall be reduced for services provided on or
after October 1, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(b) This
section does not apply to physician and professional services, inpatient
hospital services, family planning services, mental health services, dental
services, prescription drugs, medical transportation, federally qualified
health centers, rural health centers, Indian health services, and Medicare
cost-sharing.
Sec. 34. [256B.767]
MEDICARE PAYMENT LIMIT.
Effective
for services rendered on or after July 1, 2010, fee-for-service payment rates
for physician and professional services under section 256B.76, subdivision 1,
and basic care services subject to the rate reduction specified in section
256B.766, shall not exceed the Medicare payment rate for the applicable
service.
Sec. 35. [256B.768]
FEE-FOR-SERVICE PAYMENT INCREASE.
Effective
for services rendered on or after January 1, 2011, the commissioner shall
increase fee-for-service payment rates by seven percent for physician and
professional services under section 256B.76, subdivision 1, and basic care
services subject to the rate reduction specified in section 256B.766.
Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256D.03, subdivision 3, as amended by Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1,
section 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. General
assistance medical care; eligibility. (a)
Beginning April 1, 2010, the general assistance medical care program shall be
administered according to section 256D.031, unless otherwise stated, except for
outpatient prescription drug coverage, which shall continue to be administered
under this section and funded under section 256D.031, subdivision 9, beginning
June 1, 2010.
(b)
Outpatient prescription drug coverage under general assistance medical care is
limited to prescription drugs that:
(1) are
covered under the medical assistance program as described in section 256B.0625,
subdivisions 13 and 13d; and
(2) are
provided by manufacturers that have fully executed general assistance medical
care rebate agreements with the commissioner and comply with the agreements. Outpatient prescription drug coverage under
general assistance medical care must conform to coverage under the medical
assistance program according to section 256B.0625, subdivisions 13 to 13g
13h.
(c)
Outpatient prescription drug coverage does not include drugs administered in a
clinic or other outpatient setting.
(d) For the period beginning
April 1, 2010, to May 31, 2010, general assistance medical care covers the
services listed in subdivision 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective retroactively from April 1, 2010.
Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.02,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Financial
management. (a) The commissioner
shall manage spending for the MinnesotaCare program in a manner that maintains
a minimum reserve. As part of each state
revenue and expenditure forecast, the commissioner must make an assessment of
the expected expenditures for the covered services for the remainder of the
current biennium and for the following biennium. The estimated expenditure, including the
reserve, shall be compared to an estimate of the revenues that will be
available in the health care access fund.
Based on this comparison, and after consulting with the chairs of the
house of representatives Ways and Means Committee and the senate Finance
Committee, and the Legislative Commission on Health Care Access, the
commissioner shall, as necessary, make the adjustments specified in paragraph
(b) to ensure that expenditures remain within the limits of available revenues
for the remainder of the current biennium and for the following biennium. The commissioner shall not hire additional
staff using appropriations from the health care access fund until the
commissioner of management and budget makes a determination that the
adjustments implemented under paragraph (b) are sufficient to allow MinnesotaCare
expenditures to remain within the limits of available revenues for the
remainder of the current biennium and for the following biennium.
(b) The
adjustments the commissioner shall use must be implemented in this order,
but shall not be implemented before July 1, 2014: first, stop enrollment of single adults and
households without children; and second, upon 45 days' notice, stop
coverage of single adults and households without children already enrolled in
the MinnesotaCare program; third, upon 90 days' notice, decrease the premium
subsidy amounts by ten percent for families with gross annual income above 200
percent of the federal poverty guidelines; fourth, upon 90 days' notice,
decrease the premium subsidy amounts by ten percent for families with gross
annual income at or below 200 percent; and fifth, require applicants to be
uninsured for at least six months prior to eligibility in the MinnesotaCare
program. If these measures are
insufficient to limit the expenditures to the estimated amount of revenue, the
commissioner shall further limit enrollment or decrease premium subsidies
notify the chairs of the house of representatives Ways and Means Committee and
the senate Finance Committee, and the Legislative Commission on Health Care
Access, and present recommendations to the chairs and commission for limiting
expenditures to the estimated amount of revenue.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective upon federal approval of the amendments in this article to
Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056,
subdivision 4.
Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.03,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Inpatient
hospital services. (a) Covered
health services shall include inpatient hospital services, including inpatient
hospital mental health services and inpatient hospital and residential chemical
dependency treatment, subject to those limitations necessary to coordinate the
provision of these services with eligibility under the medical assistance
spenddown. The inpatient hospital
benefit for adult enrollees who qualify under section 256L.04, subdivision 7,
or who qualify under section 256L.04, subdivisions 1 and 2, with family gross
income that exceeds 200 percent of the federal poverty guidelines or 215
percent of the federal poverty guidelines on or after July 1, 2009, and who are
not pregnant, is subject to an annual limit of $10,000, unless supplemental
hospital coverage has been purchased under subdivision 3c.
(b)
Admissions for inpatient hospital services paid for under section 256L.11,
subdivision 3, must be certified as medically necessary in accordance with
Minnesota Rules, parts 9505.0500 to 9505.0540, except as provided in clauses
(1) and (2):
(1) all admissions must be
certified, except those authorized under rules established under section
254A.03, subdivision 3, or approved under Medicare; and
(2) payment
under section 256L.11, subdivision 3, shall be reduced by five percent for
admissions for which certification is requested more than 30 days after the day
of admission. The hospital may not seek
payment from the enrollee for the amount of the payment reduction under this
clause.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective January 1, 2011, or upon federal approval, whichever is
later.
Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.03, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3c. Supplemental
hospital coverage. (a)
Effective January 1, 2011, or upon federal approval, whichever is later, the
commissioner shall offer all MinnesotaCare applicants, and all enrollees during
the open enrollment periods specified in paragraph (b), the opportunity to
purchase at full cost, supplemental hospital coverage to cover inpatient
hospital expenses in excess of the inpatient hospital annual limit established
under subdivision 3. Premiums for this
coverage may vary only for age and shall be collected by the commissioner using
the procedures established for the sliding scale premium determined under
section 256L.15.
(b) The
commissioner shall notify all persons submitting applications of the option to
purchase this coverage at the time of application. The commissioner shall provide persons
enrolled in MinnesotaCare on the effective date of this subdivision with the
opportunity to purchase this supplemental coverage during an initial open
enrollment period. Following this
initial open enrollment period, the commissioner shall provide all enrollees
with the opportunity to purchase this supplemental coverage during an annual
open enrollment period during the month of November with coverage to take
effect the following January 1.
Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256L.03, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Co-payments
and coinsurance. (a) Except as
provided in paragraphs (b) and (c), the MinnesotaCare benefit plan shall
include the following co-payments and coinsurance requirements for all
enrollees:
(1) ten
percent of the paid charges for inpatient hospital services for adult
enrollees, subject to an annual inpatient out-of-pocket maximum of $1,000 per
individual;
(2) $3 per
prescription for adult enrollees;
(3) $25 for
eyeglasses for adult enrollees;
(4) $3 per
nonpreventive visit. For purposes of
this subdivision, a "visit" means an episode of service which is
required because of a recipient's symptoms, diagnosis, or established illness,
and which is delivered in an ambulatory setting by a physician or physician
ancillary, chiropractor, podiatrist, nurse midwife, advanced practice nurse,
audiologist, optician, or optometrist; and
(5) $6 for
nonemergency visits to a hospital-based emergency room for services provided
through December 31, 2010, and $3.50 effective January 1, 2011.
(b)
Paragraph (a), clause (1), does not apply to parents and relative caretakers of
children under the age of 21.
(c)
Paragraph (a) does not apply to pregnant women and children under the age of
21.
(d)
Paragraph (a), clause (4), does not apply to mental health services.
(e) Adult enrollees with
family gross income that exceeds 200 percent of the federal poverty guidelines
or 215 percent of the federal poverty guidelines on or after July 1, 2009, and
who are not pregnant shall be financially responsible for the coinsurance
amount, if applicable, and if supplemental coverage has not been purchased
under subdivision 3c, amounts which exceed the $10,000 inpatient hospital
benefit limit.
(f) When a
MinnesotaCare enrollee becomes a member of a prepaid health plan, or changes
from one prepaid health plan to another during a calendar year, any charges
submitted towards the $10,000 annual inpatient benefit limit, and any
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the enrollee for inpatient services, that
were submitted or incurred prior to enrollment, or prior to the change in
health plans, shall be disregarded.
(g)
MinnesotaCare reimbursement to fee-for-service providers and payments to
managed care plans shall not be increased as a result of the reduction of the
co-payments in paragraph (a), clause (5), effective January 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE DATE. The
amendment to paragraph (e) is effective January 1, 2011, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later.
Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.05, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Disclosure
statement for inpatient hospital limit.
The commissioner shall develop, and include with MinnesotaCare
application and renewal materials, a disclosure statement that contains the
following or similar language: "For
adults without children, and for parents and relative caretakers with family
gross income that exceeds 215 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, who
are not pregnant, coverage of inpatient hospital services under MinnesotaCare
is subject to an annual limit of $10,000.
Enrollees subject to the limit may be responsible for inpatient hospital
costs that exceed the $10,000 annual limit."
Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.07, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 9. Firefighters;
volunteer ambulance attendants. (a)
For purposes of this subdivision, "qualified individual" means:
(1) a
volunteer firefighter with a department as defined in section 299N.01,
subdivision 2, who has passed the probationary period; and
(2) a
volunteer ambulance attendant as defined in section 144E.001, subdivision 15.
(b) A
qualified individual who documents to the satisfaction of the commissioner
status as a qualified individual by completing and submitting a one-page form
developed by the commissioner is eligible for MinnesotaCare without meeting other
eligibility requirements of this chapter, but must pay premiums equal to the
average expected capitation rate for adults with no children paid under section
256L.12. Individuals eligible under this
subdivision shall receive coverage for the benefit set provided to adults with
no children.
Sec. 43. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256L.11, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Medical
assistance rate to be used. (a)
Payment to providers under sections 256L.01 to 256L.11 shall be at the same
rates and conditions established for medical assistance, except as provided in
subdivisions 2 to 6.
(b)
Effective for services provided on or after July 1, 2009, total payments for
basic care services shall be reduced by three percent, in accordance with
section 256B.766. Payments made to
managed care and county-based purchasing plans shall be reduced for services
provided on or after October 1, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(c) Effective for services
provided on or after July 1, 2009, payment rates for physician and professional
services shall be reduced as described under section 256B.76, subdivision 1,
paragraph (c). Payments made to managed
care and county-based purchasing plans shall be reduced for services provided
on or after October 1, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(d)
Effective for services provided on or after July 1, 2010, payment rates for
physician and professional services shall be reduced as described under section
256B.76, subdivision 1, paragraph (d). Payments
made to managed care plans and county-based purchasing plans shall be reduced
for services provided on or after October 1, 2010, to reflect this reduction.
Sec. 44. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.12,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Eligibility
for other state programs. MinnesotaCare
enrollees who become eligible for medical assistance or general assistance
medical care will remain in the same managed care plan if the managed care
plan has a contract for that population.
Effective January 1, 1998, MinnesotaCare enrollees who were
formerly eligible for general assistance medical care pursuant to section
256D.03, subdivision 3, within six months of MinnesotaCare enrollment and were
enrolled in a prepaid health plan pursuant to section 256D.03, subdivision 4,
paragraph (c), must remain in the same managed care plan if the managed care
plan has a contract for that population.
Managed care plans must participate in the MinnesotaCare and general
assistance medical care programs program under a contract with the
Department of Human Services in service areas where they participate in the
medical assistance program.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective retroactively from April 1, 2010.
Sec. 45. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.12,
subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Co-payments
and benefit limits. Enrollees are
responsible for all co-payments in sections 256L.03, subdivision 5, and
256L.035, and shall pay co-payments to the managed care plan or to its participating
providers. The enrollee is also
responsible for payment of inpatient hospital charges which exceed the
MinnesotaCare benefit limit, unless supplemental hospital coverage has been
purchased under subdivision 3c.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective January 1, 2011, or upon federal approval, whichever is
later.
Sec. 46. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.12,
subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Rate
setting; performance withholds. (a)
Rates will be prospective, per capita, where possible. The commissioner may allow health plans to
arrange for inpatient hospital services on a risk or nonrisk basis. The commissioner shall consult with an
independent actuary to determine appropriate rates.
(b) For
services rendered on or after January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2003, the
commissioner shall withhold .5 percent of managed care plan payments under this
section pending completion of performance targets. The withheld funds must be returned no sooner
than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year if performance
targets in the contract are achieved. A
managed care plan may include as admitted assets under section 62D.044 any
amount withheld under this paragraph that is reasonably expected to be returned.
(c) For
services rendered on or after January 1, 2004, the commissioner shall withhold
five percent of managed care plan payments under this section pending
completion of performance targets. Each
performance target must be quantifiable, objective, measurable, and reasonably
attainable, except in the case of a performance target based on a federal or
state law or rule. Criteria for
assessment of each performance target must be outlined in writing prior to the
contract effective date. The managed
care plan must demonstrate, to the commissioner's satisfaction, that the data
submitted regarding attainment of the performance target is accurate. The commissioner shall periodically change the administrative
measures used as performance targets in order to improve plan performance
across a broader range of administrative services. The performance targets must include
measurement of plan efforts to contain spending on health care services and
administrative activities. The
commissioner may adopt plan-specific performance targets that take into account
factors affecting only one plan, such as characteristics of the plan's enrollee
population. The withheld funds must be
returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following
calendar year if performance targets in the contract are achieved. A managed care plan or a county-based
purchasing plan under section 256B.692 may include as admitted assets under
section 62D.044 any amount withheld under this paragraph that is reasonably
expected to be returned.
(d) For
services rendered on or after January 1, 2011, the commissioner shall withhold
an additional three percent of managed care plan payments under this section. The withheld funds must be returned no sooner
than July 1, and no later than July 31 of the following calendar year. The return of the withhold under this
paragraph is not subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) or (c).
(e) A
managed care plan or a county-based purchasing plan under section 256B.692 may
include as admitted assets under section 62D.044 any amount withheld under this
section.
Sec. 47. Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 5, section 75,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Medical
assistance coverage. The
commissioner of human services shall establish a demonstration project to
provide additional medical assistance coverage for a maximum of 200 American
Indian children in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth who are burdened by
health disparities associated with the cumulative health impact of toxic
environmental exposures. Under this
demonstration project, the additional medical assistance coverage for this
population must include, but is not limited to, home environmental
assessments for triggers of asthma, in-home asthma education on the proper
medical management of asthma by a certified asthma educator or public health
nurse with asthma management training limited to two visits per child. Coverage also includes the following
durable medical equipment: high
efficiency particulate air (HEPA) cleaners, HEPA vacuum cleaners, allergy bed
and pillow encasements, high filtration filters for forced air gas furnaces,
and dehumidifiers with medical tubing to connect the appliance to a floor
drain, if the listed item is medically necessary useful to reduce
asthma symptoms. Provision of these
items of durable medical equipment must be preceded by a home
environmental assessment for triggers of asthma and in-home asthma education on
the proper medical management of asthma by a Certified Asthma Educator or
public health nurse with asthma management training.
Sec. 48. Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 5, section 78,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Expiration. This section, with the exception of
subdivision 4, expires December 31, 2010 June 30, 2011. Subdivision 4 expires December 31, 2011.
Sec. 49. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
12, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Coordinated
care delivery systems. (a) Effective
June 1, 2010, the commissioner shall contract with hospitals or groups of
hospitals that qualify under paragraph (b) and agree to deliver services
according to this subdivision. Contracting
hospitals shall develop and implement a coordinated care delivery system to
provide health care services to individuals who are eligible for general
assistance medical care under this section and who either choose to receive
services through the coordinated care delivery system or who are enrolled by
the commissioner under paragraph (c). A
contracting hospital may negotiate a limit to the number of general assistance
medical care enrollees it serves, but must comply with the emergency care
requirements of United States Code, title 42, 1395dd (EMTALA). The health care services provided by the
system must include: (1) the services described
in subdivision 4 with the exception of outpatient prescription drug coverage
but shall include drugs administered in a clinic or other outpatient setting;
or (2) a set of comprehensive and medically necessary health services that the
recipients might reasonably require to be maintained in good health and that
has been approved by the commissioner, including at a
minimum, but not limited to, emergency care, medical transportation services,
inpatient hospital and physician care, outpatient health services, preventive
health services, mental health services, and prescription drugs administered in
a clinic or other outpatient setting. Outpatient
prescription drug coverage is covered on a fee-for-service basis in accordance
with section 256D.03, subdivision 3, and funded under subdivision 9. A hospital establishing a coordinated care
delivery system under this subdivision must ensure that the requirements of
this subdivision are met.
(b) A
hospital or group of hospitals may contract with the commissioner to develop
and implement a coordinated care delivery system as follows:
(1)
effective June 1, 2010, a hospital qualifies under this subdivision if: (i) during calendar year 2008, it received
fee-for-service payments for services to general assistance medical care
recipients (A) equal to or greater than $1,500,000, or (B) equal to or greater
than 1.3 percent of net patient revenue; or (ii) a contract with the hospital
is necessary to provide geographic access or to ensure that at least 80 percent
of enrollees have access to a coordinated care delivery system; and
(2)
effective December 1, 2010, a Minnesota hospital not qualified under clause (1)
may contract with the commissioner under this subdivision if it agrees to
satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
Participation
by hospitals shall become effective quarterly on June 1, September 1, December
1, or March 1. Hospital participation is
effective for a period of 12 months and may be renewed for successive 12-month
periods.
Coordinated
care delivery system contracts are in effect from June 1, 2010, to December 31,
2010, or upon the effective date of the expansion of medical assistance
coverage to include adults without children, whichever is later.
(c)
Applicants and recipients may enroll in any available coordinated care delivery
system statewide. If more than one
coordinated care delivery system is available, the applicant or recipient shall
be allowed to choose among the systems that provide services within 25 miles
of the individual's community of residence.
The commissioner may assign an applicant or recipient to a coordinated
care delivery system that provides services within 25 miles of the
individual's community of residence, if no choice is made by the applicant
or recipient. The commissioner shall
consider a recipient's zip code, city of residence, county of residence, or
distance from a participating coordinated care delivery system when determining
default assignment. An applicant or
recipient may decline enrollment in a coordinated care delivery system. Upon enrollment into a coordinated care
delivery system, the recipient must agree to receive all nonemergency services
through the coordinated care delivery system.
Enrollment in a coordinated care delivery system is for six months and
may be renewed for additional six-month periods, except that initial enrollment
is for six months or until the end of a recipient's period of general
assistance medical care eligibility, whichever occurs first. A recipient who continues to meet the
eligibility requirements of this section is not eligible to enroll in
MinnesotaCare during a period of enrollment in a coordinated care delivery
system. From June 1, 2010, to November
30, 2010, applicants and recipients not enrolled in a coordinated care delivery
system may seek services from a hospital eligible for reimbursement under the
temporary uncompensated care pool established under subdivision 8. After November 30, 2010, services are
available only through a coordinated care delivery system.
(d) A
hospital must provide access to cost-effective outpatient services available in
its service area. The hospital may
contract and coordinate with providers and clinics for the delivery of services
and shall contract with federally qualified health centers and essential
community providers as defined under section 62Q.19, subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), clauses (1) and (2), to the extent practicable. If a provider or clinic contracts with a
hospital to provide services through the coordinated care delivery system, the
provider may not refuse to provide services to any recipient enrolled in the
system, and payment for services shall be negotiated with the hospital and paid
by the hospital from the system's allocation under subdivision 7.
(e) A coordinated care
delivery system must:
(1) provide
the covered services required under paragraph (a) to recipients enrolled in the
coordinated care delivery system, and comply with the requirements of
subdivision 4, paragraphs (b) to (g);
(2)
establish a process to monitor enrollment and ensure the quality of care
provided; and
(3) in
cooperation with counties, coordinate the delivery of health care services with
existing homeless prevention, supportive housing, and rent subsidy programs and
funding administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency under chapter
462A; and
(4) adopt
innovative and cost-effective methods of care delivery and coordination, which
may include the use of allied health professionals, telemedicine, patient
educators, care coordinators, and community health workers.
(f) The
hospital may require a recipient to designate a primary care provider or a
primary care clinic. The hospital may
limit the delivery of services to a network of providers who have contracted
with the hospital to deliver services in accordance with this subdivision, and
require a recipient to seek services only within this network. The hospital may also require a referral to a
provider before the service is eligible for payment. A coordinated care delivery system is not
required to provide payment to a provider who is not employed by or under
contract with the system for services provided to a recipient enrolled in the
system, except in cases of an emergency.
For purposes of this section, emergency services are defined in
accordance with Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 438.114 (a).
(g) A
recipient enrolled in a coordinated care delivery system has the right to
appeal to the commissioner according to section 256.045.
(h) The
state shall not be liable for the payment of any cost or obligation incurred by
the coordinated care delivery system.
(i) The
hospital must provide the commissioner with data necessary for assessing
enrollment, quality of care, cost, and utilization of services. Each hospital must provide, on a quarterly
basis on a form prescribed by the commissioner for each recipient served by the
coordinated care delivery system, the services provided, the cost of services
provided, and the actual payment amount for the services provided and any other
information the commissioner deems necessary to claim federal Medicaid match. The commissioner must provide this data to
the legislature on a quarterly basis.
(j)
Effective June 1, 2010, the provisions of section 256.9695, subdivision 2,
paragraph (b), do not apply to general assistance medical care provided under
this section.
(k) If a
recipient is transferred from a hospital that is not participating in a
coordinated care delivery system to a hospital participating in a coordinated
care delivery system, in order to receive a higher level of care, the
transferring hospital remains eligible to receive any available funding through
the temporary uncompensated care pool for the care initially provided at that
hospital. The hospital participating in
the coordinated care delivery system shall be responsible only for care
provided at that hospital, and is not financially liable for the initial care
provided by the transferring hospital.
Sec. 50. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
12, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Payments;
rate setting for the hospital coordinated care delivery system. (a) Effective for general assistance
medical care services, with the exception of outpatient prescription drug
coverage, provided on or after June 1, 2010, through a coordinated care
delivery system, the commissioner shall allocate the annual appropriation for the coordinated care
delivery system to hospitals participating under subdivision 6 in quarterly
payments, beginning on the first scheduled warrant on or after June 1, 2010. The payment shall be allocated among all
hospitals qualified to participate on the allocation date. Each hospital or group of hospitals shall
receive a pro rata share of the allocation based on the hospital's or group of
hospitals' calendar year 2008 payments for general assistance medical care
services, adjusted for any limits on the number of general assistance
medical care enrollees accepted by a hospital, provided that, for the
purposes of this allocation, payments to Hennepin County Medical Center,
Regions Hospital, Saint Mary's Medical Center, and University of Minnesota
Medical Center, Fairview, shall be weighted at 110 percent of the actual amount. The commissioner may prospectively reallocate
payments to participating hospitals on a biannual basis to ensure that final
allocations reflect actual coordinated care delivery system enrollment. The 2008 base year shall be updated by one
calendar year each June 1, beginning June 1, 2011.
(b) Beginning
June 1, 2010, and every quarter beginning in June thereafter, the commissioner
shall make one-third of the quarterly payment in June and the remaining
two-thirds of the quarterly payment in July to each participating hospital or
group of hospitals.
(b) (c) In order
to be reimbursed under this section, nonhospital providers of health care
services shall contract with one or more hospitals described in paragraph (a)
to provide services to general assistance medical care recipients through the
coordinated care delivery system established by the hospital. The hospital shall reimburse bills submitted
by nonhospital providers participating under this paragraph at a rate
negotiated between the hospital and the nonhospital provider.
(c) (d) The
commissioner shall apply for federal matching funds under section 256B.199,
paragraphs (a) to (d), for expenditures under this subdivision.
(d) (e) Outpatient
prescription drug coverage is provided in accordance with section 256D.03,
subdivision 3, and paid on a fee-for-service basis under subdivision 9.
Sec. 51. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
12, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Temporary
uncompensated care pool. (a) The
commissioner shall establish a temporary uncompensated care pool, effective
June 1, 2010. Payments from the pool
must be distributed, within the limits of the available appropriation, to
hospitals that are not part of a coordinated care delivery system established
under subdivision 6. Payments from
the pool must also be distributed, within the limits of the available
appropriation, to ambulance services licensed under chapter 144E that respond
to a request for an emergency ambulance call or interfacility transfer for a
general assistance medical care enrollee, if the call or transfer originates
from a location more than 25 miles from the health care facility that receives
the enrollee.
(b)
Hospitals seeking reimbursement from this pool must submit an invoice to the
commissioner in a form prescribed by the commissioner for payment for services
provided to an applicant or recipient not enrolled in a coordinated care
delivery system. A payment amount, as
calculated under current law, must be determined, but not paid, for each
admission of or service provided to a general assistance medical care recipient
on or after June 1, 2010, to November 30 December 31,
2010, or until medical assistance coverage is expanded to include adults
without children, whichever is later.
(c) The
aggregated payment amounts for each hospital must be calculated as a percentage
of the total calculated amount for all hospitals.
(d)
Distributions from the uncompensated care pool for each hospital must be
determined by multiplying the factor in paragraph (c) by the amount of money in
the uncompensated care pool that is available for the six‑month period.
(e) The commissioner shall
apply for federal matching funds under section 256B.199, paragraphs (a) to (d),
for expenditures under this subdivision.
(f)
Outpatient prescription drugs are not eligible for payment under this
subdivision.
Sec. 52. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
12, the effective date, is amended to read:
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This section is effective for services rendered on or after
April 1, 2010, except that subdivision 4 is effective June 1, 2010.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective retroactively from April 1, 2010.
Sec. 53. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
16, is amended to read:
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.05,
subdivision 3c, is amended to read:
Subd. 3c. Retroactive
coverage. Notwithstanding
subdivision 3, the effective date of coverage shall be the first day of the
month following termination from medical assistance for families and
individuals who are eligible for MinnesotaCare and who submitted a written
request for retroactive MinnesotaCare coverage with a completed application
within 30 days of the mailing of notification of termination from medical
assistance. The applicant must provide
all required verifications within 30 days of the written request for
verification. For retroactive coverage,
premiums must be paid in full for any retroactive month, current month, and
next month within 30 days of the premium billing. General assistance medical care recipients
may qualify for retroactive coverage under this subdivision at six-month
renewal.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective June 1, 2010.
Sec. 54. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
21, is amended to read:
Sec. 21. REPEALER.
(a)
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 256.742; 256.979, subdivision 8; and 256D.03,
subdivision 9, are repealed effective April 1, 2010.
(b)
Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 4, is repealed
effective April June 1, 2010.
(c)
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.195, subdivisions 4 and 5, are repealed
effective for federal fiscal year 2010.
(d)
Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.195, subdivisions 1, 2, and 3,
are repealed effective for federal fiscal year 2010.
(e)
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 256L.07, subdivision 6; 256L.15, subdivision
4; and 256L.17, subdivision 7, are repealed January 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective retroactively from April 1, 2010.
Sec. 55. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 2, section 2,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Total Appropriation $(7,985,000) $(93,128,000)
Appropriations by
Fund
2010 2011
General 34,807,000 118,493,000
Health Care
Access (42,792,000) (211,621,000)
The amounts
that may be spent for each purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Special Revenue Fund Transfers.
(1) The
commissioner shall transfer the following amounts from special revenue fund
balances to the general fund by June 30 of each respective fiscal year: $410,000 for fiscal year 2010, and $412,000
for fiscal year 2011.
(2) Actual
transfers made under clause (1) must be separately identified and reported as
part of the quarterly reporting of transfers to the chairs of the relevant
senate budget division and house of representatives finance division.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 56. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 2, section 2,
subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Transfers
The
commissioner must transfer $29,538,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $18,462,000 in
fiscal year 2011 from the health care access fund to the general fund. This is a onetime transfer.
The
commissioner must transfer $4,800,000 from the consolidated chemical dependency
treatment fund to the general fund by June 30, 2010.
Compulsive Gambling Special Revenue Administration. The lottery prize fund appropriation
for compulsive gambling administration is reduced by $6,000 for
fiscal year 2010 and $4,000 for fiscal year 2011 must be transferred from
the lottery prize fund appropriation for compulsive gambling administration to
the general fund by June 30 of each respective fiscal year. These are onetime reductions.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 57. EARLY
EXPANSION.
All costs
related to implementation of Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision
15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, paragraph (e), shall be paid from the health
care access fund.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective upon federal approval and is retroactive to April 1, 2010.
Sec. 58. FISCAL
AND ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS.
The
commissioner of human services shall offer a request for proposal and accept
bids for the completion of a complete fiscal and actuarial analysis of 2010
House File 135 and 2010 Senate File 118.
The commissioner shall report this analysis to the chairs of the health
and human services finance and policy divisions in the house of representatives
and senate no later than December 15, 2010.
Sec. 59. REPEALER;
TRANSFER.
(a) Laws
2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
and 9, are repealed.
(b) Laws
2010, chapter 200, article 1, sections 18; and 19, are repealed.
(c)
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256D.03, subdivisions 3a, 3b, 5, 6, 7, and 8,
and Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3, are
repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. Paragraphs
(a) and (b) are effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in
this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and
256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later, and
all remaining unspent appropriations for the program established by Laws 2010,
chapter 200, are transferred to the health care access fund. Paragraph (c) is effective 30 days after
federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes,
sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1,
2011, whichever is later.
ARTICLE 3
CONTINUING
CARE
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
252.27, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Contribution
amount. (a) The natural or adoptive
parents of a minor child, including a child determined eligible for medical
assistance without consideration of parental income, must contribute to the
cost of services used by making monthly payments on a sliding scale based on
income, unless the child is married or has been married, parental rights have
been terminated, or the child's adoption is subsidized according to section
259.67 or through title IV-E of the Social Security Act. The parental contribution is a partial or
full payment for medical services provided for diagnostic, therapeutic, curing,
treating, mitigating, rehabilitation, maintenance, and personal care services
as defined in United States Code, title 26, section 213, needed by the child
with a chronic illness or disability.
(b) For
households with adjusted gross income equal to or greater than 100 percent of
federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be computed by
applying the following schedule of rates to the adjusted gross income of the
natural or adoptive parents:
(1) if the
adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 100 percent of federal
poverty guidelines and less than 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the
parental contribution is $4 per month;
(2) if the
adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 175 percent of federal
poverty guidelines and less than or equal to 545 percent of federal poverty
guidelines, the parental contribution shall be determined using a sliding fee
scale established by the commissioner of human services which begins at one
percent of adjusted gross income at 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines
and increases to 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income for those with adjusted
gross income up to 545 percent of federal poverty guidelines; and
(3)
if the adjusted gross income is greater than 545 percent of federal poverty
guidelines and less than 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the
parental contribution shall be 7.5 12.5 percent of adjusted gross
income;.
(4) if the
adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 675 percent of federal
poverty guidelines and less than 975 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the
parental contribution shall be determined using a sliding fee scale established
by the commissioner of human services which begins at 7.5 percent of adjusted
gross income at 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines and increases to ten
percent of adjusted gross income for those with adjusted gross income up to 975
percent of federal poverty guidelines; and
(5) if the
adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 975 percent of federal
poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be 12.5 percent of adjusted
gross income.
If the
child lives with the parent, the annual adjusted gross income is reduced by
$2,400 prior to calculating the parental contribution. If the child resides in an institution
specified in section 256B.35, the parent is responsible for the personal needs
allowance specified under that section in addition to the parental contribution
determined under this section. The
parental contribution is reduced by any amount required to be paid directly to
the child pursuant to a court order, but only if actually paid.
(c) The
household size to be used in determining the amount of contribution under
paragraph (b) includes natural and adoptive parents and their dependents,
including the child receiving services. Adjustments
in the contribution amount due to annual changes in the federal poverty
guidelines shall be implemented on the first day of July following publication
of the changes.
(d) For
purposes of paragraph (b), "income" means the adjusted gross income
of the natural or adoptive parents determined according to the previous year's
federal tax form, except, effective retroactive to July 1, 2003, taxable
capital gains to the extent the funds have been used to purchase a home shall not
be counted as income.
(e) The
contribution shall be explained in writing to the parents at the time
eligibility for services is being determined.
The contribution shall be made on a monthly basis effective with the
first month in which the child receives services. Annually upon redetermination or at
termination of eligibility, if the contribution exceeded the cost of services
provided, the local agency or the state shall reimburse that excess amount to
the parents, either by direct reimbursement if the parent is no longer required
to pay a contribution, or by a reduction in or waiver of parental fees until
the excess amount is exhausted. All
reimbursements must include a notice that the amount reimbursed may be taxable
income if the parent paid for the parent's fees through an employer's health
care flexible spending account under the Internal Revenue Code, section 125,
and that the parent is responsible for paying the taxes owed on the amount
reimbursed.
(f) The
monthly contribution amount must be reviewed at least every 12 months; when
there is a change in household size; and when there is a loss of or gain in
income from one month to another in excess of ten percent. The local agency shall mail a written notice
30 days in advance of the effective date of a change in the contribution amount. A decrease in the contribution amount is
effective in the month that the parent verifies a reduction in income or change
in household size.
(g) Parents
of a minor child who do not live with each other shall each pay the
contribution required under paragraph (a).
An amount equal to the annual court-ordered child support payment
actually paid on behalf of the child receiving services shall be deducted from
the adjusted gross income of the parent making the payment prior to calculating
the parental contribution under paragraph (b).
(h) The
contribution under paragraph (b) shall be increased by an additional five
percent if the local agency determines that insurance coverage is available but
not obtained for the child. For purposes
of this section, "available" means the insurance is a benefit of
employment for a family member at an annual cost of no more than five percent of the family's
annual income. For purposes of this
section, "insurance" means health and accident insurance coverage,
enrollment in a nonprofit health service plan, health maintenance organization,
self-insured plan, or preferred provider organization.
Parents who
have more than one child receiving services shall not be required to pay more
than the amount for the child with the highest expenditures. There shall be no resource contribution from
the parents. The parent shall not be
required to pay a contribution in excess of the cost of the services provided
to the child, not counting payments made to school districts for
education-related services. Notice of an
increase in fee payment must be given at least 30 days before the increased fee
is due.
(i) The
contribution under paragraph (b) shall be reduced by $300 per fiscal year if,
in the 12 months prior to July 1:
(1) the
parent applied for insurance for the child;
(2) the
insurer denied insurance;
(3) the
parents submitted a complaint or appeal, in writing to the insurer, submitted a
complaint or appeal, in writing, to the commissioner of health or the
commissioner of commerce, or litigated the complaint or appeal; and
(4) as a
result of the dispute, the insurer reversed its decision and granted insurance.
For
purposes of this section, "insurance" has the meaning given in paragraph
(h).
A parent
who has requested a reduction in the contribution amount under this paragraph
shall submit proof in the form and manner prescribed by the commissioner or
county agency, including, but not limited to, the insurer's denial of insurance,
the written letter or complaint of the parents, court documents, and the
written response of the insurer approving insurance. The determinations of the commissioner or
county agency under this paragraph are not rules subject to chapter 14.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.057,
subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Employed
persons with disabilities. (a)
Medical assistance may be paid for a person who is employed and who:
(1) but
for excess earnings or assets, meets the definition of disabled under the
supplemental security income program;
(2) is at
least 16 but less than 65 years of age;
(3) meets
the asset limits in paragraph (c); and
(4) effective
November 1, 2003, pays a premium and other obligations under paragraph (e).
Any spousal
income or assets shall be disregarded for purposes of eligibility and premium
determinations.
(b) After
the month of enrollment, a person enrolled in medical assistance under this subdivision
who:
(1) is
temporarily unable to work and without receipt of earned income due to a
medical condition, as verified by a physician, may retain eligibility for up to
four calendar months; or
(2)
effective January 1, 2004, loses employment for reasons not attributable to the
enrollee, may retain eligibility for up to four consecutive months after the
month of job loss. To receive a
four-month extension, enrollees must verify the medical condition or provide
notification of job loss. All other eligibility
requirements must be met and the enrollee must pay all calculated premium costs
for continued eligibility.
(c) For
purposes of determining eligibility under this subdivision, a person's assets
must not exceed $20,000, excluding:
(1) all
assets excluded under section 256B.056;
(2)
retirement accounts, including individual accounts, 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans,
Keogh plans, and pension plans; and
(3) medical
expense accounts set up through the person's employer.
(d)(1)
Effective January 1, 2004, for purposes of eligibility, there will be a $65
earned income disregard. To be eligible,
a person applying for medical assistance under this subdivision must have
earned income above the disregard level.
(2)
Effective January 1, 2004, to be considered earned income, Medicare, Social
Security, and applicable state and federal income taxes must be withheld. To be eligible, a person must document earned
income tax withholding.
(e)(1) A
person whose earned and unearned income is equal to or greater than 100 percent
of federal poverty guidelines for the applicable family size must pay a premium
to be eligible for medical assistance under this subdivision. The premium shall be based on the person's
gross earned and unearned income and the applicable family size using a sliding
fee scale established by the commissioner, which begins at one percent of
income at 100 percent of the federal poverty guidelines and increases to
7.5 percent of income for those with incomes at or above 300 percent of the
federal poverty guidelines. Annual
adjustments in the premium schedule based upon changes in the federal poverty
guidelines shall be effective for premiums due in July of each year.
(2)
Effective January 1, 2004, all enrollees must pay a premium to be eligible for medical
assistance under this subdivision. An
enrollee shall pay the greater of a $35 $50 premium or the
premium calculated in clause (1).
(3)
Effective November 1, 2003, all enrollees who receive unearned income must pay one-half
of one 2.5 percent of unearned income in addition to the premium
amount.
(4)
Effective November 1, 2003, for enrollees whose income does not exceed 200
percent of the federal poverty guidelines and who are also enrolled in
Medicare, the commissioner must reimburse the enrollee for Medicare Part B
premiums under section 256B.0625, subdivision 15, paragraph (a).
(5)
Increases in benefits under title II of the Social Security Act shall not be
counted as income for purposes of this subdivision until July 1 of each year.
(f) A
person's eligibility and premium shall be determined by the local county agency. Premiums must be paid to the commissioner. All premiums are dedicated to the
commissioner.
(g) Any
required premium shall be determined at application and redetermined at the
enrollee's six-month income review or when a change in income or household size
is reported. Enrollees must report any
change in income or household size within ten days of when the change occurs. A decreased premium resulting from a reported
change in income or household size shall be effective the first day of the next
available billing month after the change is reported. Except for changes occurring from annual
cost-of-living increases, a change resulting in an increased premium shall not
affect the premium amount until the next six-month review.
(h) Premium payment is due
upon notification from the commissioner of the premium amount required. Premiums may be paid in installments at the
discretion of the commissioner.
(i)
Nonpayment of the premium shall result in denial or termination of medical
assistance unless the person demonstrates good cause for nonpayment. Good cause exists if the requirements
specified in Minnesota Rules, part 9506.0040, subpart 7, items B to D, are met. Except when an installment agreement is
accepted by the commissioner, all persons disenrolled for nonpayment of a
premium must pay any past due premiums as well as current premiums due prior to
being reenrolled. Nonpayment shall
include payment with a returned, refused, or dishonored instrument. The commissioner may require a guaranteed
form of payment as the only means to replace a returned, refused, or dishonored
instrument.
(j) The
commissioner shall notify enrollees annually beginning at least 24 months
before the person's 65th birthday of the medical assistance eligibility rules
affecting income, assets, and treatment of a spouse's income and assets that
will be applied upon reaching age 65.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective January 1, 2011.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0915, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Elderly
waiver cost limits. (a) The monthly
limit for the cost of waivered services to an individual elderly waiver client
except for individuals described in paragraph (b) shall be the weighted average
monthly nursing facility rate of the case mix resident class to which the
elderly waiver client would be assigned under Minnesota Rules, parts 9549.0050
to 9549.0059, less the recipient's maintenance needs allowance as described in
subdivision 1d, paragraph (a), until the first day of the state fiscal year in
which the resident assessment system as described in section 256B.438 for
nursing home rate determination is implemented.
Effective on the first day of the state fiscal year in which the
resident assessment system as described in section 256B.438 for nursing home
rate determination is implemented and the first day of each subsequent state
fiscal year, the monthly limit for the cost of waivered services to an
individual elderly waiver client shall be the rate of the case mix resident
class to which the waiver client would be assigned under Minnesota Rules, parts
9549.0050 to 9549.0059, in effect on the last day of the previous state fiscal
year, adjusted by the greater of any legislatively adopted home and
community-based services percentage rate increase or the average statewide
percentage increase in nursing facility payment rates adjustment.
(b) The
monthly limit for the cost of waivered services to an individual elderly waiver
client assigned to a case mix classification A under paragraph (a) with (1) no
dependencies in activities of daily living, (2) only one dependency in bathing,
dressing, grooming, or walking, or (3) a dependency score of less than three if
eating is the only dependency, shall be the lower of the case mix
classification amount for case mix A as determined under paragraph (a) or the
case mix classification amount for case mix A effective on October 1, 2008, per
month for all new participants enrolled in the program on or after July 1, 2009. This monthly limit shall be applied to all
other participants who meet this criteria at reassessment.
(c) If
extended medical supplies and equipment or environmental modifications are or
will be purchased for an elderly waiver client, the costs may be prorated for
up to 12 consecutive months beginning with the month of purchase. If the monthly cost of a recipient's waivered
services exceeds the monthly limit established in paragraph (a) or (b), the
annual cost of all waivered services shall be determined. In this event, the annual cost of all
waivered services shall not exceed 12 times the monthly limit of waivered
services as described in paragraph (a) or (b).
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0915,
subdivision 3b, is amended to read:
Subd. 3b. Cost
limits for elderly waiver applicants who reside in a nursing facility. (a) For a person who is a nursing
facility resident at the time of requesting a determination of eligibility for
elderly waivered services, a monthly conversion limit for the cost of elderly
waivered services may be requested. The
monthly conversion limit for the cost of elderly waiver services shall be the
resident class assigned under Minnesota Rules, parts 9549.0050 to 9549.0059, for that resident
in the nursing facility where the resident currently resides until July 1 of
the state fiscal year in which the resident assessment system as described in
section 256B.438 for nursing home rate determination is implemented. Effective on July 1 of the state fiscal year
in which the resident assessment system as described in section 256B.438 for
nursing home rate determination is implemented, the monthly conversion limit
for the cost of elderly waiver services shall be the per diem nursing facility
rate as determined by the resident assessment system as described in section
256B.438 for that resident residents in the nursing facility
where the resident currently resides, but in effect on June 30, 2010, and
adjusted annually by any legislatively adopted percentage change in the elderly
waiver services rates. That per diem
shall be multiplied by 365 and, divided by 12, less and
reduced by the recipient's maintenance needs allowance as described in
subdivision 1d. The initially approved
conversion rate may must be adjusted by the greater of any
subsequent legislatively adopted home and community-based services percentage
rate increase or the average statewide percentage increase in nursing
facility payment rates adjustment.
The limit under this subdivision only applies to persons discharged from
a nursing facility after a minimum 30-day stay and found eligible for waivered
services on or after July 1, 1997. For
conversions from the nursing home to the elderly waiver with consumer directed
community support services, the conversion rate limit is equal to the nursing
facility rate reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage difference
between the consumer directed services budget limit that would be assigned
according to the federally approved waiver plan and the corresponding community
case mix cap, but not to exceed 50 percent.
(b) The
following costs must be included in determining the total monthly costs for the
waiver client:
(1) cost of
all waivered services, including extended medical specialized supplies
and equipment and environmental modifications and accessibility adaptations;
and
(2) cost of
skilled nursing, home health aide, and personal care services reimbursable by
medical assistance.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.69, subdivision 23, is amended to read:
Subd. 23. Alternative
services; elderly and disabled persons. (a)
The commissioner may implement demonstration projects to create alternative
integrated delivery systems for acute and long-term care services to elderly
persons and persons with disabilities as defined in section 256B.77,
subdivision 7a, that provide increased coordination, improve access to quality
services, and mitigate future cost increases.
The commissioner may seek federal authority to combine Medicare and
Medicaid capitation payments for the purpose of such demonstrations and may
contract with Medicare-approved special needs plans to provide Medicaid
services. Medicare funds and services
shall be administered according to the terms and conditions of the federal
contract and demonstration provisions. For
the purpose of administering medical assistance funds, demonstrations under
this subdivision are subject to subdivisions 1 to 22. The provisions of Minnesota Rules, parts
9500.1450 to 9500.1464, apply to these demonstrations, with the exceptions of
parts 9500.1452, subpart 2, item B; and 9500.1457, subpart 1, items B and C,
which do not apply to persons enrolling in demonstrations under this section. An initial open enrollment period may be
provided. Persons who disenroll from
demonstrations under this subdivision remain subject to Minnesota Rules, parts
9500.1450 to 9500.1464. When a person is
enrolled in a health plan under these demonstrations and the health plan's
participation is subsequently terminated for any reason, the person shall be
provided an opportunity to select a new health plan and shall have the right to
change health plans within the first 60 days of enrollment in the second health
plan. Persons required to participate in
health plans under this section who fail to make a choice of health plan shall
not be randomly assigned to health plans under these demonstrations. Notwithstanding section 256L.12, subdivision
5, and Minnesota Rules, part 9505.5220, subpart 1, item A, if adopted, for the
purpose of demonstrations under this subdivision, the commissioner may contract
with managed care organizations, including counties, to serve only elderly
persons eligible for medical assistance, elderly and disabled persons, or
disabled persons only. For persons with
a primary diagnosis of developmental disability, serious and persistent mental
illness, or serious emotional disturbance, the commissioner must ensure that
the county authority has approved the demonstration and contracting design. Enrollment in these projects for persons with
disabilities shall be voluntary. The
commissioner shall not implement any demonstration project under this
subdivision for persons with a primary diagnosis of developmental disabilities,
serious and persistent mental illness, or serious emotional disturbance,
without approval of the county board of the county in which the demonstration
is being implemented.
(b) Notwithstanding chapter
245B, sections 252.40 to 252.46, 256B.092, 256B.501 to 256B.5015, and Minnesota
Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0036, 9525.1200 to 9525.1330, 9525.1580, and
9525.1800 to 9525.1930, the commissioner may implement under this section
projects for persons with developmental disabilities. The commissioner may capitate payments for
ICF/MR services, waivered services for developmental disabilities, including
case management services, day training and habilitation and alternative active
treatment services, and other services as approved by the state and by the
federal government. Case management and
active treatment must be individualized and developed in accordance with a
person-centered plan. Costs under these
projects may not exceed costs that would have been incurred under
fee-for-service. Beginning July 1, 2003,
and until four years after the pilot project implementation date, subcontractor
participation in the long-term care developmental disability pilot is limited
to a nonprofit long-term care system providing ICF/MR services, home and
community-based waiver services, and in-home services to no more than 120
consumers with developmental disabilities in Carver, Hennepin, and Scott
Counties. The commissioner shall report
to the legislature prior to expansion of the developmental disability pilot
project. This paragraph expires four
years after the implementation date of the pilot project.
(c) Before
implementation of a demonstration project for disabled persons, the
commissioner must provide information to appropriate committees of the house of
representatives and senate and must involve representatives of affected
disability groups in the design of the demonstration projects.
(d) A
nursing facility reimbursed under the alternative reimbursement methodology in
section 256B.434 may, in collaboration with a hospital, clinic, or other health
care entity provide services under paragraph (a). The commissioner shall amend the state plan
and seek any federal waivers necessary to implement this paragraph.
(e) The
commissioner, in consultation with the commissioners of commerce and health,
may approve and implement programs for all-inclusive care for the elderly
(PACE) according to federal laws and regulations governing that program and
state laws or rules applicable to participating providers. The process for approval of these programs
shall begin only after the commissioner receives grant money in an amount
sufficient to cover the state share of the administrative and actuarial costs
to implement the programs during state fiscal years 2006 and 2007. Grant amounts for this purpose shall be
deposited in an account in the special revenue fund and are appropriated to the
commissioner to be used solely for the purpose of PACE administrative and
actuarial costs. A PACE provider is
not required to be licensed or certified as a health plan company as defined in
section 62Q.01, subdivision 4. Persons
age 55 and older who have been screened by the county and found to be eligible
for services under the elderly waiver or community alternatives for disabled
individuals or who are already eligible for Medicaid but meet level of care
criteria for receipt of waiver services may choose to enroll in the PACE
program. Medicare and Medicaid services
will be provided according to this subdivision and federal Medicare and
Medicaid requirements governing PACE providers and programs. PACE enrollees will receive Medicaid home and
community-based services through the PACE provider as an alternative to
services for which they would otherwise be eligible through home and
community-based waiver programs and Medicaid State Plan Services. The commissioner shall establish Medicaid
rates for PACE providers that do not exceed costs that would have been incurred
under fee-for-service or other relevant managed care programs operated by the
state.
(f) The
commissioner shall seek federal approval to expand the Minnesota disability
health options (MnDHO) program established under this subdivision in stages,
first to regional population centers outside the seven-county metro area and
then to all areas of the state. Until
July 1, 2009, expansion for MnDHO projects that include home and
community-based services is limited to the two projects and service areas in
effect on March 1, 2006. Enrollment in
integrated MnDHO programs that include home and community-based services shall
remain voluntary. Costs for home and
community-based services included under MnDHO must not exceed costs that would
have been incurred under the fee-for-service program. Notwithstanding whether expansion occurs
under this paragraph, in determining MnDHO payment rates and risk adjustment
methods for contract years starting in 2012, the commissioner must consider the
methods used to determine county allocations for home and community-based
program participants. If necessary to
reduce MnDHO rates to comply with the provision regarding MnDHO costs for home
and community-based services, the commissioner shall achieve the reduction by
maintaining the base rate for contract years 2010 and
2011 for services provided under the community alternatives for disabled
individuals waiver at the same level as for contract year 2009. The commissioner may apply other reductions
to MnDHO rates to implement decreases in provider payment rates required by
state law. In developing program
specifications for expansion of integrated programs, the commissioner shall
involve and consult the state-level stakeholder group established in
subdivision 28, paragraph (d), including consultation on whether and how to
include home and community-based waiver programs. Plans for further expansion of MnDHO projects
shall be presented to the chairs of the house of representatives and senate
committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance
by February 1, 2007.
(g)
Notwithstanding section 256B.0261, health plans providing services under this
section are responsible for home care targeted case management and relocation
targeted case management. Services must
be provided according to the terms of the waivers and contracts approved by the
federal government.
Sec. 6. [256.4825]
REPORT REGARDING PROGRAMS AND SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.
The
Minnesota State Council on Disability, the Minnesota Consortium for Citizens
with Disabilities, and the Arc of Minnesota may submit an annual report by
January 15 of each year, beginning in 2012, to the chairs and ranking minority
members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over programs serving
people with disabilities as provided in this section. The report must describe the existing state
policies and goals for programs serving people with disabilities including, but
not limited to, programs for employment, transportation, housing, education,
quality assurance, consumer direction, physical and programmatic access, and
health. The report must provide data and
measurements to assess the extent to which the policies and goals are being met. The commissioner of human services and the
commissioners of other state agencies administering programs for people with
disabilities shall cooperate with the Minnesota State Council on Disability,
the Minnesota Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, and the Arc of
Minnesota and provide those organizations with existing published information
and reports that will assist in the preparation of the report.
Sec. 7. CASE
MANAGEMENT REFORM.
(a) By February
1, 2011, the commissioner of human services shall provide specific
recommendations and language for proposed legislation to:
(1) define
the administrative and the service functions of case management and make
changes to improve the funding for administrative functions;
(2)
standardize and simplify processes, standards, and timelines for administrative
functions of case management within the Department of Human Services,
Disability Services Division, including eligibility determinations, resource allocation,
management of dollars, provision for assignment of one case manager at a time
per person, waiting lists, quality assurance, host county concurrence
requirements, county of financial responsibility provisions, and waiver
compliance; and
(3) increase
opportunities for consumer choice of case management functions involving
service coordination.
(b) In
developing these recommendations, the commissioner shall consider the
recommendations of the 2007 Redesigning Case Management Services for Persons with
Disabilities report and consult with existing stakeholder groups, which include
representatives of counties, disability and senior advocacy groups, service
providers, and representatives of agencies which provide contracted case
management.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 8. COMMISSIONER
TO SEEK FEDERAL MATCH.
(a) The
commissioner of human services shall seek federal financial participation for
eligible activity related to fiscal years 2010 and 2011 grants to Advocating
Change Together to establish a statewide self-advocacy network for persons with
developmental disabilities and for eligible activities under any future grants
to the organization.
(b) The
commissioner shall report to the chairs of the senate Health and Human Services
Budget Division and the house of representatives Health Care and Human Services
Finance Division by December 15, 2010, with the results of the application for
federal matching funds.
ARTICLE 4
CHILDREN AND
FAMILY SERVICES
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 119B.025,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Factors
which must be verified. (a) The
county shall verify the following at all initial child care applications using
the universal application:
(1) identity
of adults;
(2) presence
of the minor child in the home, if questionable;
(3)
relationship of minor child to the parent, stepparent, legal guardian, eligible
relative caretaker, or the spouses of any of the foregoing;
(4) age;
(5) immigration
status, if related to eligibility;
(6) Social
Security number, if given;
(7) income;
(8) spousal
support and child support payments made to persons outside the household;
(9)
residence; and
(10)
inconsistent information, if related to eligibility.
(b) If a
family did not use the universal application or child care addendum to apply
for child care assistance, the family must complete the universal application
or child care addendum at its next eligibility redetermination and the county
must verify the factors listed in paragraph (a) as part of that redetermination. Once a family has completed a universal
application or child care addendum, the county shall use the redetermination
form described in paragraph (c) for that family's subsequent redeterminations. Eligibility must be redetermined at least
every six months. For a family where
at least one parent is under the age of 21, does not have a high school or
general equivalency diploma, and is a student in a school district or another
similar program that provides or arranges for child care, as well as parenting,
social services, career and employment supports, and academic support to
achieve high school graduation, the redetermination of eligibility shall be
deferred beyond six months, but not to exceed 12 months, to the end of the
student's school year. If a family
reports a change in an eligibility factor before the family's next regularly
scheduled redetermination, the county must recalculate eligibility without
requiring verification of any eligibility factor that did not change.
(c) The commissioner shall
develop a redetermination form to redetermine eligibility and a change report
form to report changes that minimize paperwork for the county and the
participant.
(d)
Families have the primary responsibility to verify information. A county must consider the family's
circumstances and ability to produce verification when initiating a request for
verification. If a family is unable to
verify an eligibility factor, the county must request written consent from the
family to obtain verification from other sources. A county may not request a specific form of
verification if another is more readily available. When verification of an eligibility factor
other than income is not available despite the efforts of the county and the
family, the county must accept a signed statement from the family attesting to
the correctness of the information if one is provided. The county must deny or end assistance to
families who refuse or deliberately fail to verify information.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective October 15, 2010.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 119B.09,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Eligibility;
annual income; calculation. Annual
income of the applicant family is the current monthly income of the family
multiplied by 12 or the income for the 12-month period immediately preceding
the date of application, or income calculated by the method which provides the
most accurate assessment of income available to the family. Self-employment income must be calculated
based on gross receipts less operating expenses. Income must be recalculated when the family's
income changes, but no less often than every six months. For a family where at least one parent is
under the age of 21, does not have a high school or general equivalency
diploma, and is a student in a school district or another similar program that
provides or arranges for child care, as well as parenting, social services,
career and employment supports, and academic support to achieve high school
graduation, income must be recalculated when the family's income changes, but
otherwise shall be deferred beyond six months, but not to exceed 12 months, to
the end of the student's school year. Income
must be verified with documentary evidence.
If the applicant does not have sufficient evidence of income,
verification must be obtained from the source of the income.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective October 15, 2010.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 119B.11,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. County
contributions required. (a) In
addition to payments from basic sliding fee child care program participants,
each county shall contribute from county tax or other sources a fixed local
match maintenance of effort equal to its calendar year 1996 required
county contribution reduced by the administrative funding loss that would have
occurred in state fiscal year 1996 under section 119B.15, except the
maintenance of effort for a county must be equal to at least 1.1 percent of the
county's basic sliding fee direct services allocation for the previous calendar
year and no greater than six percent of the county's basic sliding fee direct
services allocation for the previous calendar year. The commissioner shall recover funds from the
county as necessary to bring county expenditures into compliance with this
subdivision. The commissioner may accept
county contributions, including contributions above the fixed local match
county maintenance of effort, in order to make state payments.
(b) The
commissioner may accept payments from counties to:
(1) fulfill
the county contribution as required under subdivision 1;
(2) pay for
services authorized under this chapter beyond those paid for with federal or
state funds or with the required county contributions; or
(3) pay for
child care services in addition to those authorized under this chapter, as
authorized under other federal, state, or local statutes or regulations.
(c) The county payments must
be deposited in an account in the special revenue fund. Money in this account is appropriated to the
commissioner for child care assistance under this chapter and other applicable
statutes and regulations and is in addition to other state and federal
appropriations.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective January 1, 2011.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256D.0515,
is amended to read:
256D.0515 ASSET LIMITATIONS FOR FOOD STAMP HOUSEHOLDS.
All food
stamp households must be determined eligible for the benefit discussed under
section 256.029. Food stamp households
must demonstrate that:
(1) their gross
income meets the federal Food Stamp requirements under United States Code,
title 7, section 2014(c); and is equal to or less than 165 percent of
the federal poverty guidelines for the same family size.
(2) they
have financial resources, excluding vehicles, of less than $7,000.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256J.20,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Other
property limitations. To be eligible
for MFIP, the equity value of all nonexcluded real and personal property of the
assistance unit must not exceed $2,000 for applicants and $5,000 for ongoing
participants. The value of assets in clauses
(1) to (19) must be excluded when determining the equity value of real and
personal property:
(1) a
licensed vehicle up to a loan value of less than or equal to $15,000
$7,500. If the assistance unit
owns more than one licensed vehicle, the county agency shall determine the loan
value of all additional vehicles and exclude the combined loan value of less
than or equal to $7,500. The county
agency shall apply any excess loan value as if it were equity value to the
asset limit described in this section,. If the assistance unit owns more than one
licensed vehicle, the county agency shall determine the vehicle with the
highest loan value and count only the loan value over $7,500, excluding: (i) the value of one vehicle per physically
disabled person when the vehicle is needed to transport the disabled unit
member; this exclusion does not apply to mentally disabled people; (ii) the
value of special equipment for a disabled member of the assistance unit; and
(iii) any vehicle used for long-distance travel, other than daily commuting,
for the employment of a unit member.
The county
agency shall count the loan value of all other vehicles and apply this amount
as if it were equity value to the asset limit described in this section. To establish the loan value of
vehicles, a county agency must use the N.A.D.A.
Official Used Car Guide, Midwest Edition, for newer model cars. When a vehicle is not listed in the
guidebook, or when the applicant or participant disputes the loan value listed
in the guidebook as unreasonable given the condition of the particular vehicle,
the county agency may require the applicant or participant document the loan
value by securing a written statement from a motor vehicle dealer licensed
under section 168.27, stating the amount that the dealer would pay to purchase
the vehicle. The county agency shall
reimburse the applicant or participant for the cost of a written statement that
documents a lower loan value;
(2) the
value of life insurance policies for members of the assistance unit;
(3) one
burial plot per member of an assistance unit;
(4) the
value of personal property needed to produce earned income, including tools,
implements, farm animals, inventory, business loans, business checking and
savings accounts used at least annually and used exclusively for the operation
of a self-employment business, and any motor vehicles if at least 50 percent of
the vehicle's use is to produce income and if the vehicles are essential for
the self-employment business;
(5) the value of personal
property not otherwise specified which is commonly used by household members in
day-to-day living such as clothing, necessary household furniture, equipment,
and other basic maintenance items essential for daily living;
(6) the
value of real and personal property owned by a recipient of Supplemental
Security Income or Minnesota supplemental aid;
(7) the
value of corrective payments, but only for the month in which the payment is
received and for the following month;
(8) a
mobile home or other vehicle used by an applicant or participant as the
applicant's or participant's home;
(9) money
in a separate escrow account that is needed to pay real estate taxes or
insurance and that is used for this purpose;
(10) money
held in escrow to cover employee FICA, employee tax withholding, sales tax
withholding, employee worker compensation, business insurance, property rental,
property taxes, and other costs that are paid at least annually, but less often
than monthly;
(11)
monthly assistance payments for the current month's or short-term emergency
needs under section 256J.626, subdivision 2;
(12) the
value of school loans, grants, or scholarships for the period they are intended
to cover;
(13)
payments listed in section 256J.21, subdivision 2, clause (9), which are held
in escrow for a period not to exceed three months to replace or repair personal
or real property;
(14) income
received in a budget month through the end of the payment month;
(15)
savings from earned income of a minor child or a minor parent that are set
aside in a separate account designated specifically for future education or
employment costs;
(16) the
federal earned income credit, Minnesota working family credit, state and
federal income tax refunds, state homeowners and renters credits under chapter
290A, property tax rebates and other federal or state tax rebates in the month
received and the following month;
(17)
payments excluded under federal law as long as those payments are held in a
separate account from any nonexcluded funds;
(18) the
assets of children ineligible to receive MFIP benefits because foster care or
adoption assistance payments are made on their behalf; and
(19) the
assets of persons whose income is excluded under section 256J.21, subdivision
2, clause (43).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective October 1, 2010.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256J.24,
subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. MFIP
exit level. The commissioner shall
adjust the MFIP earned income disregard to ensure that most participants do not
lose eligibility for MFIP until their income reaches at least disregard shall be based on a
household size of three, and the resulting earned income disregard percentage
must be applied to all household sizes. The
adjustment under this subdivision must be implemented 115 110
percent of the federal poverty guidelines in effect in October of each
fiscal year at the time of the adjustment. The adjustment to the at the same time as
the October food stamp or whenever there is a food support cost-of-living
adjustment is reflected in the food portion of MFIP transitional
standard as required under subdivision 5a.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective October 1, 2010.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256J.37,
subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Rental
subsidies; unearned income. (a) Effective
July 1, 2003, The county agency shall count $50 $100 of the
value of public and assisted rental subsidies provided through the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as unearned income to the cash portion
of the MFIP grant. The full amount of
the subsidy must be counted as unearned income when the subsidy is less than $50
$100. The income from this subsidy
shall be budgeted according to section 256J.34.
(b) The
provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to an MFIP assistance unit which
includes a participant who is:
(1) age 60
or older;
(2) a
caregiver who is suffering from an illness, injury, or incapacity that has been
certified by a qualified professional when the illness, injury, or incapacity
is expected to continue for more than 30 days and prevents the person from
obtaining or retaining employment; or
(3) a
caregiver whose presence in the home is required due to the illness or
incapacity of another member in the assistance unit, a relative in the
household, or a foster child in the household when the illness or incapacity
and the need for the participant's presence in the home has been certified by a
qualified professional and is expected to continue for more than 30 days.
(c) The
provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to an MFIP assistance unit where
the parental caregiver is an SSI recipient.
(d) Prior
to implementing this provision, the commissioner must identify the MFIP
participants subject to this provision and provide written notice to these
participants at least 30 days before the first grant reduction. The notice must inform the participant of the
basis for the potential grant reduction, the exceptions to the provision, if
any, and inform the participant of the steps necessary to claim an exception. A person who is found not to meet one of the
exceptions to the provision must be notified and informed of the right to a
fair hearing under section 256J.40. The
notice must also inform the participant that the participant may be eligible
for a rent reduction resulting from a reduction in the MFIP grant and encourage
the participant to contact the local housing authority.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective October 1, 2010.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256J.425, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Hard-to-employ
participants. (a) An assistance unit
subject to the time limit in section 256J.42, subdivision 1, is eligible to
receive months of assistance under a hardship extension if the participant who
reached the time limit belongs to any of the following groups:
(1) a
person who is diagnosed by a licensed physician, psychological practitioner, or
other qualified professional, as developmentally disabled or mentally ill, and
the condition severely limits the person's ability to obtain or maintain
suitable employment;
(2) a person who:
(i) has been
assessed by a vocational specialist or the county agency to be unemployable for
purposes of this subdivision; or
(ii) has an
IQ below 80 who has been assessed by a vocational specialist or a county agency
to be employable, but the condition severely limits the person's ability to
obtain or maintain suitable employment. The
determination of IQ level must be made by a qualified professional. In the case of a non-English-speaking person: (A) the determination must be made by a
qualified professional with experience conducting culturally appropriate
assessments, whenever possible; (B) the county may accept reports that identify
an IQ range as opposed to a specific score; (C) these reports must include a
statement of confidence in the results;
(3) a person
who is determined by a qualified professional to be learning disabled, and the
condition severely limits the person's ability to obtain or maintain suitable
employment. For purposes of the initial
approval of a learning disability extension, the determination must have been
made or confirmed within the previous 12 months. In the case of a non-English-speaking person: (i) the determination must be made by a
qualified professional with experience conducting culturally appropriate
assessments, whenever possible; and (ii) these reports must include a statement
of confidence in the results. If a
rehabilitation plan for a participant extended as learning disabled is
developed or approved by the county agency, the plan must be incorporated into
the employment plan. However, a
rehabilitation plan does not replace the requirement to develop and comply with
an employment plan under section 256J.521; or
(4) a person
who has been granted a family violence waiver, and who is complying with an
employment plan under section 256J.521, subdivision 3.
(b) For
purposes of this section chapter, "severely limits the
person's ability to obtain or maintain suitable employment" means:
(1) that a
qualified professional has determined that the person's condition prevents the
person from working 20 or more hours per week; or
(2) for a
person who meets the requirements of paragraph (a), clause (2), item (ii), or
clause (3), a qualified professional has determined the person's condition:
(i)
significantly restricts the range of employment that the person is able to
perform; or
(ii)
significantly interferes with the person's ability to obtain or maintain
suitable employment for 20 or more hours per week.
Sec. 9. QUALITY
RATING SYSTEM TRAINING, COACHING, CONSULTATION, AND SUPPORTS.
The
commissioner of human services shall direct $500,000 in federal child care
development funds used for grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.21, in
fiscal year 2011 for the purpose of providing statewide child care provider
training, coaching, consultation, and supports to prepare for the voluntary
Minnesota quality rating system. This is
a onetime appropriation. In addition, to
the extent that private funds are made available, the commissioner shall designate
those funds for this purpose.
Sec. 10. CHILD
CARE ASSISTANCE REDETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY AND INFORMATION VERIFICATION.
The
commissioner of human services shall use existing resources to implement the
changes in this act related to child care assistance redetermination of
eligibility and information verification under Minnesota Statutes, sections
119B.025, subdivision 1, and 119B.09, subdivision 4.
ARTICLE 5
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 1. [62A.3075]
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT COVERAGE.
(a) A
health plan company that provides coverage under a health plan for cancer
chemotherapy treatment shall not require a higher co-payment, deductible, or
coinsurance amount for a prescribed, orally administered anticancer medication
that is used to kill or slow the growth of cancerous cells than what the health
plan requires for an intravenously administered or injected cancer medication
that is provided, regardless of formulation or benefit category determination
by the health plan company.
(b) A
health plan company must not achieve compliance with this section by imposing
an increase in co-payment, deductible, or coinsurance amount for an
intravenously administered or injected cancer chemotherapy agent covered under
the health plan.
(c) Nothing
in this section shall be interpreted to prohibit a health plan company from
requiring prior authorization or imposing other appropriate utilization
controls in approving coverage for any chemotherapy.
(d) A plan
offered by the commissioner of management and budget under section 43A.23 is
deemed to be at parity and in compliance with this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. Paragraphs
(a) and (c) are effective August 1, 2010, and apply to health plans providing
coverage to a Minnesota resident offered, issued, sold, renewed, or continued
as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 60A.02, subdivision 2a, on or after
that date. Paragraph (b) is effective
the day following final enactment.
Sec. 2. [62A.3094]
COVERAGE FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. (a)
For purposes of this section, the terms defined in paragraphs (b) to (e) have
the meanings given.
(b)
"Autism spectrum disorder" means the following conditions as
determined by criteria set forth in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric
Association:
(1) autism
or autistic disorder;
(2)
Asperger's syndrome; or
(3)
pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified.
(c)
"Board-certified behavior analyst" means an individual certified by
the Behavior Analyst Certification Board as a board-certified behavior analyst.
(d)
"Evidence-based," for purposes of this section only, is as described
in subdivision 2, paragraph (c), clause (2).
(e)
"Health plan" has the meaning given in section 62Q.01, subdivision 3.
(f)
"Manualized approach" means a self-contained volume, text, or set of
instructional media, which may include videos or compact discs, that codifies
in reasonable detail the procedures for implementing treatment.
(g) "Medical
necessity" or "medically necessary care" has the meaning given
in section 62Q.53, subdivision 2.
(h)
"Mental health professional" has the meaning given in section
245.4871, subdivision 27, clauses (1) to (6).
(i) "Qualified
mental health behavioral aide" means a mental health behavioral aide as
defined in section 256B.0943, subdivision 7.
(j)
"Qualified mental health practitioner" means a mental health
practitioner as defined in section 245.4871, subdivision 26.
(k)
"Statistically superior outcomes" means a research study in which the
probability that the results would be obtained under the null hypothesis is
less than five percent.
Subd. 2. Coverage
required. (a) For coverage
requirements to apply, an individual must have a diagnosis of autism spectrum
disorder made through an evaluation of the patient, completed within the six
months prior to the start of treatment, which includes all of the following:
(1) a
complete medical and psychological evaluation performed by a licensed physician
and psychologist using empirically validated tools or tests that incorporate
measures for intellectual functioning, language development, adaptive skills,
and behavioral problems, which must include:
(i) a
developmental history of the child, focusing on developmental milestones and
delays;
(ii) a
family history, including whether there are other family members with an autism
spectrum disorder, developmental disability, fragile X syndrome, or tuberous
sclerosis;
(iii) a
medical history, including signs of deterioration, seizure activity, brain
injury, and head circumference;
(iv) a
physical examination completed within the past 12 months;
(v) an
evaluation for intellectual functioning;
(vi) a lead
screening for those children with a developmental disability; and
(vii) other
evaluations and testing as indicated by the medical evaluation, which may
include neuropsychological testing, occupational therapy, physical therapy,
family functioning, genetic testing, imaging laboratory tests, and
electrophysiological testing;
(2) a
communication assessment conducted by a speech pathologist; and
(3) a
comprehensive hearing test conducted by an audiologist with experience in
testing very young children.
(b) A
health plan must provide coverage for the diagnosis, evaluation, assessment,
and medically necessary care of autism spectrum disorders that is
evidence-based, including but not limited to:
(1)
neurodevelopmental and behavioral health treatments, instruction, and management;
(2) applied
behavior analysis and intensive early intervention services, including service
package models such as intensive early intervention behavior therapy services
and Lovaas therapy;
(3) speech
therapy;
(4) occupational therapy;
(5) physical
therapy; and
(6)
prescription medications.
(c)
Coverage required under this section shall include treatment that is in
accordance with:
(1) an
individualized treatment plan prescribed by the insured's treating physician or
mental health professional as defined in this section; and
(2)
medically and scientifically accepted evidence that meets the criteria of a
peer-reviewed, published study that is one of the following:
(i) a
randomized study with adequate statistical power, including a sample size of 30
or more for each group, that shows statistically superior outcomes to a pill
placebo group, psychological placebo group, another treatment group, or a wait
list control group, or that is equivalent to another evidence-based treatment
that meets the above standard for the specified problem area; or
(ii) a
series of at least three single-case design experiments with clear
specification of the subjects and with clear specification of the treatment
approach that:
(A) use
robust experimental designs;
(B) show
statistically superior outcomes to pill placebo, psychological placebo, or
another treatment group; and
(C) either
use a manualized approach or are conducted by at least two independent
investigators or teams; or
(3) where
evidence meeting the standards of this subdivision does not exist for the
treatment of a diagnosed condition or for an individual matching the
demographic characteristics for which the evidence is valid, practice
guidelines based on consensus of Minnesota health care professionals
knowledgeable in the treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorders.
(d) Early
intensive behavior therapies that meet the criteria set forth in paragraphs (b)
and (c) must also meet the following best practices standards:
(1) the
services must be prescribed by a mental health professional as an appropriate
treatment option for the individual child;
(2) regular
reporting of services provided and the child's progress must be submitted to
the prescribing mental health professional;
(3) care
must include appropriate parent or legal guardian education and involvement;
(4) the
medically prescribed treatment and frequency of services should be coordinated
between the school and provider for all children up to age 21; and
(5)
services must be provided by a mental health professional or, as appropriate, a
board-certified behavior analyst, a qualified mental health practitioner, or a
qualified mental health behavioral aide.
(e) Providers under this
section must work with the commissioner in implementing evidence-based
practices and, specifically for children under age 21, the Minnesota
Evidence-Based Practice Database of research-informed practice elements and
specific constituent practices.
(f) A
health plan company may not refuse to renew or reissue, or otherwise terminate
or restrict coverage of an individual solely because the individual is
diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder.
(g) A
health plan company may request an updated treatment plan only once every six
months, unless the health plan company and the treating physician or mental
health professional agree that a more frequent review is necessary due to
emerging circumstances.
Subd. 3. Supervision,
delegation of duties, and observation of qualified mental health practitioner,
board-certified behavior analyst, or mental health behavioral aide. A mental health professional who uses
the services of a qualified mental health practitioner, board-certified
behavior analyst, or qualified mental health behavioral aide for the purpose of
assisting in the provision of services to patients who have autism spectrum
disorder is responsible for functions performed by these service providers. The qualified mental health professional must
maintain clinical supervision of services they provide and accept full
responsibility for their actions. The
services provided must be medically necessary and identified in the child's
individual treatment plan. Service
providers must document their activities in written progress notes that reflect
implementation of the individual treatment plan.
Subd. 4. State
health care programs. This
section does not affect benefits available under the medical assistance,
MinnesotaCare, and general assistance medical care programs, and the state
employee group insurance plan offered under sections 43A.22 to 43A.30. These programs and the state employee group
insurance plan must maintain current levels of coverage, and section 256B.0644
shall continue to apply. The
commissioner shall monitor these services and report to the chairs of the house
of representatives and senate standing committees that have jurisdiction over
health and human services by February 1, 2011, whether there are gaps in the
level of service provided by these programs and the state employee group
insurance plan, and the level of service provided by private health plans
following enactment of this section.
Subd. 5. No
effect on other law. Nothing
in this section limits in any way the coverage required under sections 62Q.47
and 62Q.53.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective August 1, 2010, and applies to coverage offered, issued,
sold, renewed, or continued as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 60A.02,
subdivision 2a, on or after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62J.38, is
amended to read:
62J.38 COST CONTAINMENT DATA FROM GROUP PURCHASERS.
(a) The
commissioner shall require group purchasers to submit detailed data on total
health care spending for each calendar year.
Group purchasers shall submit data for the 1993 calendar year by April
1, 1994, and each April 1 thereafter shall submit data for the preceding
calendar year.
(b) The
commissioner shall require each group purchaser to submit data on revenue,
expenses, and member months, as applicable.
Revenue data must distinguish between premium revenue and revenue from
other sources and must also include information on the amount of revenue in
reserves and changes in reserves. Expenditure
data must distinguish between costs incurred for patient care and
administrative costs, including amounts paid to contractors, subcontractors,
and other entities for the purpose of managing provider utilization or
distributing provider payments. Patient
care and administrative costs must include only expenses incurred on behalf of
health plan members and must not include the cost of providing health care
services for nonmembers at facilities owned by the group purchaser or affiliate. Expenditure data must be provided separately
for the following categories and for other categories required by
the commissioner: physician services,
dental services, other professional services, inpatient hospital services,
outpatient hospital services, emergency, pharmacy services and other nondurable
medical goods, mental health, and chemical dependency services, other
expenditures, subscriber liability, and administrative costs. Administrative costs must include costs for
marketing; advertising; overhead; salaries and benefits of central office staff
who do not provide direct patient care; underwriting; lobbying; claims
processing; provider contracting and credentialing; detection and prevention of
payment for fraudulent or unjustified requests for reimbursement or services;
clinical quality assurance and other types of medical care quality improvement
efforts; concurrent or prospective utilization review as defined in section
62M.02; costs incurred to acquire a hospital, clinic, or health care facility,
or the assets thereof; capital costs incurred on behalf of a hospital or clinic;
lease payments; or any other costs incurred pursuant to a partnership, joint
venture, integration, or affiliation agreement with a hospital, clinic, or
other health care provider. Capital
costs and costs incurred must be recorded according to standard accounting
principles. The reports of this data
must also separately identify expenses for local, state, and federal taxes,
fees, and assessments. The commissioner
may require each group purchaser to submit any other data, including data in
unaggregated form, for the purposes of developing spending estimates, setting
spending limits, and monitoring actual spending and costs. In addition to reporting administrative costs
incurred to acquire a hospital, clinic, or health care facility, or the assets
thereof; or any other costs incurred pursuant to a partnership, joint venture,
integration, or affiliation agreement with a hospital, clinic, or other health
care provider; reports submitted under this section also must include the
payments made during the calendar year for these purposes. The commissioner shall make public, by group
purchaser data collected under this paragraph in accordance with section
62J.321, subdivision 5. Workers'
compensation insurance plans and automobile insurance plans are exempt from
complying with this paragraph as it relates to the submission of administrative
costs.
(c) The
commissioner may collect information on:
(1)
premiums, benefit levels, managed care procedures, and other features of health
plan companies;
(2) prices,
provider experience, and other information for services less commonly covered
by insurance or for which patients commonly face significant out-of-pocket
expenses; and
(3)
information on health care services not provided through health plan companies,
including information on prices, costs, expenditures, and utilization.
(d) All
group purchasers shall provide the required data using a uniform format and
uniform definitions, as prescribed by the commissioner.
Sec. 4. [62Q.545]
COVERAGE OF PRIVATE DUTY NURSING SERVICES.
(a) A health
plan must cover private duty nursing services as provided under section
256B.0625, subdivision 7, for persons who are covered under the health plan and
require private duty nursing services.
(b) For
purposes of this section, a period of private duty nursing services may be
subject to the co-payment, coinsurance, deductible, or other enrollee
cost-sharing requirements that apply under the health plan. Cost-sharing requirements for private duty
nursing services must not place a greater financial burden on the insured or
enrollee than those requirements applied by the health plan to other similar
services or benefits.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective July 1, 2010, and applies to health plans offered, sold, issued,
or renewed on or after that date.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62Q.76,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Applicability. For purposes of sections 62Q.76 to 62Q.79
62Q.791, the terms defined in this section contract, health care
provider, dental plan, dental organization, dentist, and enrollee have the
meanings given them in sections 62Q.733 and 62Q.76.
Sec. 6. [62Q.791]
CONTRACTS WITH DENTAL CARE PROVIDERS.
(a)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no contract of any dental
organization licensed under chapter 62C for provision of dental care services
may:
(1)
require, directly or indirectly, that a dentist or health care provider provide
dental care services to its enrollees at a fee set by the dental organization,
unless the services provided are covered dental care services for enrollees
under the dental plan or contract; or
(2)
prohibit, directly or indirectly, the dentist or health care provider from
offering or providing dental care services that are not covered dental care
services under the dental plan or contract, on terms and conditions acceptable
to the enrollee and the dentist or health care provider. For purposes of this section, "covered
dental care services" means dental care services that are expressly
covered under the dental plan or contract, including dental care services that
are subject to contractual limitations such as deductibles, co-payments, annual
maximums, and waiting periods.
(b) When
making payment or otherwise adjudicating any claim for dental care services
provided to an enrollee, a dental organization or dental plan must clearly
identify on an explanation of benefits form or other form of claim resolution
the amount, if any, that is the enrollee's responsibility to pay to the enrollee's
dentist or health care provider.
(c) This
section does not apply to any contract for the provision of dental care
services under any public program sponsored or funded by the state or federal
government.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective August 1, 2010.
Sec. 7. [245.6971]
ADVISORY GROUP ON STATE-OPERATED SERVICES REDESIGN.
Subdivision
1. Establishment. The
Advisory Group on State-Operated Services Redesign is established to make
recommendations to the commissioner of human services and the legislature on
the continuum of services needed to provide individuals with complex conditions
including mental illness and developmental disabilities access to quality care
and the appropriate level of care across the state to promote wellness, reduce
cost, and improve efficiency.
Subd. 2. Duties. The Advisory Group on State-Operated
Services Redesign shall make recommendations to the commissioner and the
legislature no later than December 15, 2010, on the following:
(1) transformation
needed to improve service delivery and provide a continuum of care, such as
transition of current facilities, closure of current facilities, or the
development of new models of care;
(2) gaps
and barriers to accessing quality care, system inefficiencies, and cost
pressures;
(3)
services that are best provided by the state and those that are best provided
in the community;
(4) an
implementation plan to achieve integrated service delivery across the public,
private, and nonprofit sectors;
(5) an
implementation plan to ensure that individuals with complex chemical and mental
health needs receive the appropriate level of care to achieve recovery and
wellness; and
(6) financing mechanisms that
include all possible revenue sources to maximize federal funding and promote
cost efficiencies and sustainability.
Subd. 3. Membership. The advisory group shall be composed
of the following, who will serve at the pleasure of their appointing authority:
(1) the
commissioner of human services or the commissioner's designee, and two
additional representatives from the department;
(2) two
legislators appointed by the speaker of the house, one from the minority and
one from the majority;
(3) two
legislators appointed by the senate rules committee, one from the minority and
one from the majority;
(4) one
representative appointed by AFSCME Council 5;
(5) one
representative appointed by the ombudsman for mental health and developmental
disabilities;
(6) one
representative appointed by the Minnesota Association of Professional
Employees;
(7) one
representative appointed by the Minnesota Hospital Association;
(8) one
representative appointed by the Minnesota Nurses Association;
(9) one
representative appointed by NAMI-MN;
(10) one
representative appointed by the Mental Health Association of Minnesota;
(11) one
representative appointed by the Minnesota Association Of Community Mental
Health Programs;
(12) one
representative appointed by the Minnesota Dental Association;
(13) three clients
or client family members representing different populations receiving services
from state-operated services, who are appointed by the commissioner;
(14) one
representative appointed by the chair of the state-operated services governing
board; and
(15) one
representative appointed by the Minnesota Disability Law Center.
Subd. 4. Administration. The commissioner shall convene the
first meeting of the advisory group and shall provide administrative support
and staff.
Subd. 5. Recommendations. The advisory group must report its
recommendations to the commissioner and to the legislature no later than
December 15, 2010.
Subd. 6. Expiration. This section expires January 31, 2011.
Sec. 8. [245.6972]
LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL REQUIRED.
The commissioner
of human services shall not redesign or move state-operated services programs
without specific legislative approval. The
commissioner may proceed with redesign at the Mankato Crisis Center and the
closure of the Community Behavioral Health Hospital in Cold Spring.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
252.025, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Minnesota
extended treatment options. The
commissioner shall develop by July 1, 1997, the Minnesota extended treatment
options to serve Minnesotans who have developmental disabilities and exhibit
severe behaviors which present a risk to public safety. This program is statewide and must provide
specialized residential services in Cambridge and an array of community-based
services with sufficient levels of care and a sufficient number of specialists
to ensure that individuals referred to the program receive the appropriate care. The number of beds at the Cambridge
facility may be reorganized into two 16-bed facilities, one for individuals
with developmental disabilities and one for individuals with developmental
disabilities and a co-occurring mental illness, with the remaining beds
converted into transitional intensive treatment foster homes. The individuals working in the community-based
services under this section are state employees supervised by the commissioner
of human services. No layoffs shall
occur as a result of restructuring under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.01,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. American
Indian. For purposes of services
provided under section 254B.09, subdivision 7 254B.09, subdivision 8,
"American Indian" means a person who is a member of an Indian tribe,
and the commissioner shall use the definitions of "Indian" and
"Indian tribe" and "Indian organization" provided in Public
Law 93-638. For purposes of services
provided under section 254B.09, subdivision 4 254B.09, subdivision 6,
"American Indian" means a resident of federally recognized tribal
lands who is recognized as an Indian person by the federally recognized tribal
governing body.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.02,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Chemical
dependency treatment allocation. The
chemical dependency funds appropriated for allocation treatment
appropriation shall be placed in a special revenue account. The commissioner shall annually transfer
funds from the chemical dependency fund to pay for operation of the drug and
alcohol abuse normative evaluation system and to pay for all costs incurred by
adding two positions for licensing of chemical dependency treatment and
rehabilitation programs located in hospitals for which funds are not otherwise
appropriated. Six percent of the
remaining money must be reserved for tribal allocation under section 254B.09,
subdivisions 4 and 5. The commissioner
shall annually divide the money available in the chemical dependency fund that
is not held in reserve by counties from a previous allocation, or allocated to
the American Indian chemical dependency tribal account. Six percent of the remaining money must be
reserved for the nonreservation American Indian chemical dependency allocation
for treatment of American Indians by eligible vendors under section 254B.05,
subdivision 1. The remainder of the
money must be allocated among the counties according to the following
formula, using state demographer data and other data sources determined by the
commissioner: in the special
revenue account must be used according to the requirements in this chapter.
(a) For
purposes of this formula, American Indians and children under age 14 are
subtracted from the population of each county to determine the restricted
population.
(b) The
amount of chemical dependency fund expenditures for entitled persons for
services not covered by prepaid plans governed by section 256B.69 in the
previous year is divided by the amount of chemical dependency fund expenditures
for entitled persons for all services to determine the proportion of exempt
service expenditures for each county.
(c) The
prepaid plan months of eligibility is multiplied by the proportion of exempt
service expenditures to determine the adjusted prepaid plan months of
eligibility for each county.
(d) The adjusted prepaid plan
months of eligibility is added to the number of restricted population fee for
service months of eligibility for the Minnesota family investment program,
general assistance, and medical assistance and divided by the county restricted
population to determine county per capita months of covered service
eligibility.
(e) The
number of adjusted prepaid plan months of eligibility for the state is added to
the number of fee for service months of eligibility for the Minnesota family
investment program, general assistance, and medical assistance for the state
restricted population and divided by the state restricted population to
determine state per capita months of covered service eligibility.
(f) The
county per capita months of covered service eligibility is divided by the state
per capita months of covered service eligibility to determine the county
welfare caseload factor.
(g) The
median married couple income for the most recent three-year period available
for the state is divided by the median married couple income for the same
period for each county to determine the income factor for each county.
(h) The
county restricted population is multiplied by the sum of the county welfare
caseload factor and the county income factor to determine the adjusted
population.
(i) $15,000
shall be allocated to each county.
(j) The
remaining funds shall be allocated proportional to the county adjusted
population.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.02,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Administrative
adjustment. The commissioner may
make payments to local agencies from money allocated under this section to
support administrative activities under sections 254B.03 and 254B.04. The administrative payment must not exceed the
lesser of (1) five percent of the first $50,000, four percent of the next
$50,000, and three percent of the remaining payments for services from the allocation
special revenue account according to subdivision 1; or (2) the local agency
administrative payment for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, adjusted in
proportion to the statewide change in the appropriation for this chapter.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.03,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Division
of costs. Except for services
provided by a county under section 254B.09, subdivision 1, or services provided
under section 256B.69 or 256D.03, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), the county
shall, out of local money, pay the state for 15 16.14 percent of
the cost of chemical dependency services, including those services provided to
persons eligible for medical assistance under chapter 256B and general
assistance medical care under chapter 256D.
Counties may use the indigent hospitalization levy for treatment and
hospital payments made under this section.
Fifteen 16.14 percent of any state collections from
private or third-party pay, less 15 percent of for the cost of
payment and collections, must be distributed to the county that paid for a
portion of the treatment under this section.
If all funds allocated according to section 254B.02 are exhausted by
a county and the county has met or exceeded the base level of expenditures
under section 254B.02, subdivision 3, the county shall pay the state for 15
percent of the costs paid by the state under this section. The commissioner may refuse to pay state
funds for services to persons not eligible under section 254B.04, subdivision
1, if the county financially responsible for the persons has exhausted its
allocation.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.05,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Regional
treatment centers. Regional
treatment center chemical dependency treatment units are eligible vendors. The commissioner may expand the capacity of
chemical dependency treatment units beyond the capacity funded by direct
legislative appropriation to serve individuals who are referred for treatment
by counties and whose treatment will be paid for or other funding sources. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections
254B.03 to 254B.041, payment for any person committed at county request to a
regional treatment center under chapter 253B for chemical dependency treatment
and determined to be ineligible under the chemical dependency consolidated
treatment fund, shall become the responsibility of the county. with a county's allocation
under section 254B.02 by funding under this chapter
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.06,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Allocation
of collections. The commissioner
shall allocate all federal financial participation collections to the
reserve fund under section 254B.02, subdivision 3 a special revenue
account. The commissioner shall retain
85 allocate 83.86 percent of patient payments and third-party
payments to the special revenue account and allocate the collections
to the treatment allocation for the county that is financially responsible for
the person. Fifteen 16.14
percent of patient and third-party payments must be paid to the county
financially responsible for the patient.
Collections for patient payment and third-party payment for services
provided under section 254B.09 shall be allocated to the allocation of the
tribal unit which placed the person. Collections
of federal financial participation for services provided under section 254B.09
shall be allocated to the tribal reserve account under section 254B.09,
subdivision 5.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 254B.09,
subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Payments
to improve services to American Indians.
The commissioner may set rates for chemical dependency services to
American Indians according to the American Indian Health Improvement Act,
Public Law 94-437, for eligible vendors.
These rates shall supersede rates set in county purchase of service
agreements when payments are made on behalf of clients eligible according to
Public Law 94-437.
Sec. 17. [254B.13]
PILOT PROJECTS; CHEMICAL HEALTH CARE.
Subdivision
1. Authorization for pilot projects. The commissioner of human services may
approve and implement pilot projects developed under the planning process
required under Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26, to provide
alternatives to and enhance coordination of the delivery of chemical health
services required under section 254B.03.
Subd. 2. Program
design and implementation. (a)
The commissioner of human services and counties participating in the pilot
projects shall continue to work in partnership to refine and implement the
pilot projects initiated under Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26.
(b) The
commissioner and counties participating in the pilot projects shall complete
the planning phase by June 30, 2010, and, if approved by the commissioner
for implementation, enter into agreements governing the operation of the pilot
projects with implementation scheduled no earlier than July 1, 2010.
Subd. 3. Program
evaluation. The commissioner
of human services shall evaluate pilot projects under this section and report
the results of the evaluation to the legislative committees with jurisdiction
over chemical health by June 30, 2013. Evaluation
of the pilot projects must be based on outcome evaluation criteria negotiated
with the projects prior to implementation.
Subd. 4. Notice
of project discontinuation. Each
county's participation in the pilot project may be discontinued for any reason
by the county or the commissioner of human services after 30 days' written
notice to the other party. Any unspent
funds held for the exiting county's pro rata share in the special revenue fund
under the authority in subdivision 5, paragraph (c), shall be transferred to
the general fund following discontinuation of the pilot project.
Subd. 5.
(1) in
addition to those authorized under section 254B.03, subdivision 2, paragraph
(a); and
(2) by
vendors in addition to those authorized under section 254B.05 when not providing
chemical dependency treatment services.
(b) State
expenditures for chemical dependency services and any other services provided
by or through the pilot projects must not be greater than chemical dependency
treatment fund expenditures expected in the absence of the pilot projects. The commissioner may restructure the schedule
of payments between the state and participating counties under the local agency
share and division of cost provisions under section 254B.03, subdivisions 3 and
4, as necessary to facilitate the operation of the pilot projects.
(c) To the
extent that state fiscal year expenditures within a pilot project region are
less than expected in the absence of the pilot projects, the commissioner may
deposit these unexpended funds in the special revenue fund and make these funds
available for expenditure by the pilot counties the following year. To the extent that treatment and pilot
project ancillary services expenditures within the pilot project exceed the
amount expected in the absence of the pilot projects, the pilot counties are
responsible for the portion of nontreatment expenditures in excess of otherwise
expected expenditures.
(d) The
commissioner may waive administrative rule requirements which are incompatible
with the implementation of the pilot project.
(e) The
commissioner shall not approve or enter into any agreement related to pilot
projects authorized under this section which puts current or future federal
funding at risk.
Subd. 6. Duties
of county board. The county board,
or other county entity that is approved to administer a pilot project, shall:
(1)
administer the pilot project in a manner consistent with the objectives
described in subdivision 2 and the planning process in subdivision 5;
(2) ensure
that no one is denied chemical dependency treatment services for which they
would otherwise be eligible under section 254A.03, subdivision 3; and
(3) provide
the commissioner of human services with timely and pertinent information as
negotiated in agreements governing operation of the pilot projects.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.01, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 30. Office
of Health Care Inspector General. (a)
The commissioner shall create within the Department of Human Services an Office
of Health Care Inspector General to enhance antifraud activities and to protect
the integrity of the state health care programs, as well as the health and
welfare of the beneficiaries of those programs.
The Office of Health Care Inspector General must periodically report to
the commissioner and to the legislature program and management problems and
recommendations to correct them.
(b) The
duties of the Office of Health Care Inspector General include, but are not
limited to:
(1)
promoting economy, efficiency, and effectiveness through the elimination of
waste, fraud, and abuse;
(2) conducting and supervising
audits, investigations, inspections, and evaluations relating to the state
health care programs under chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L;
(3)
identifying weaknesses giving rise to opportunities for fraud and abuse in the
state health care programs and operations and making recommendations to prevent
their recurrence;
(4) leading
and coordinating activities to prevent and detect fraud and abuse in the state
health care programs and operations;
(5)
detecting wrongdoers and abusers of the state health care programs and
beneficiaries so appropriate remedies may be brought;
(6) keeping
the commissioner and the legislature fully and currently informed about
problems and deficiencies in the administration of the state health care
programs and operations and about the need for and progress of
corrective action;
(7)
operating a toll-free hotline to permit individuals to call in suspected fraud,
waste, or abuse, referring the calls for appropriate action by the agency, and
analyzing the calls to identify trends and patterns of fraud and abuse needing
attention;
(8)
developing and reviewing legislative, regulatory, and program proposals to
reduce vulnerabilities to fraud, waste, and mismanagement; and
(9)
recommending changes in program policies, regulations, and laws to improve
efficiency and effectiveness, and to prevent fraud, waste, abuse, and
mismanagement.
(c)
Beginning July 1, 2011, the commissioner, in consultation with the Office of
Health Care Inspector General, shall annually report to the legislature and the
governor new results from the two ongoing federal Medicaid audits. The commissioner shall report (1) the most
recent Medicaid Integrity Program (MIP) audit results, with any corrective
actions needed, and (2) certify the rate of errors determined for the state
health care programs under chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L, as determined from
the most recent Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) audit results for
Minnesota. When the PERM audit rate for
Minnesota is greater than the national rate for the year or the MIP audit
determines the need for corrective action, the commissioner shall present a
plan to the legislature and the governor for the corrective actions and
reduction of the error rate in the next calendar year.
Sec. 19. Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 3, section 18,
is amended to read:
Sec. 18. REQUIRING
THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY-BASED MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR PATIENTS
COMMITTED TO THE ANOKA-METRO REGIONAL TREATMENT CENTER.
In
consultation with community partners, the commissioner of human services The
Advisory Group on State-Operated Services Redesign shall develop
recommend an array of community-based services to transform the current
services now provided to patients at the Anoka-Metro Regional Treatment Center. The community-based services may be provided
in facilities with 16 or fewer beds, and must provide the appropriate level of
care for the patients being admitted to the facilities. The planning for this transition must be
completed by October 1, 2009 2010, with an initial report to the
committee chairs of health and human services by November 30, 2009
2010, and a semiannual report on progress until the transition is completed. The commissioner of human services shall
solicit interest from stakeholders and potential community partners. The individuals working in the
community-based services facilities under this section are state employees supervised
by the commissioner of human services. No
layoffs shall occur as a result of restructuring under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 20. NONSUBMISSION
OF HEALTH CARE CLAIM BY CLEARINGHOUSE; SIGNIFICANT DISRUPTION.
(a) A
situation shall be considered a significant disruption to normal operations
that materially affects the provider's or facility's ability to conduct
business in a normal manner and to submit claims on a timely basis under
Minnesota Statutes, section 62Q.75, if:
(1) a
clearinghouse loses, or otherwise does not submit, a health care claim as
required by Minnesota Statutes, section 62J.536; and
(2) the
provider or facility can substantiate that it submitted a complete claim to the
clearinghouse within provisions stated in contract or six months of the date of
service, whichever is less.
(b) This
section expires January 1, 2012.
Sec. 21. REPORT
ON HUMAN SERVICES FISCAL NOTES.
The
commissioner of human services shall issue a report to the legislature no later
than November 15, 2010, making recommendations for the establishment of a
legislative budget office division for the preparation and completion of fiscal
notes as required by Minnesota Statutes, section 3.98. The report must include detailed information
regarding the necessary financial costs, staff resources, and data protection
requirements for a legislative budget office to complete fiscal notes for the
Department of Human Services. The report
must describe the methods and procedures used by legislatures in other states
that ensure the independence and accuracy of fiscal estimates on legislative
proposals. The report must include
proposed bill language for transferring all fiscal note responsibilities to an
appropriate nonpartisan office within the legislative branch.
Sec. 22. REPEALER.
Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 254B.02, subdivisions 2, 3, and 4; and 254B.09,
subdivisions 4, 5, and 7, and Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26, subdivision
3, are repealed.
Sec. 23. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 10
to 14 and 22 are effective for claims paid on or after July 1, 2010.
ARTICLE 6
DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62D.08, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. Consistent
administrative expenses and investment income reporting. (a) Every health maintenance
organization must directly allocate administrative expenses to specific lines
of business or products when such information is available. Remaining expenses that cannot be directly
allocated must be allocated based on other methods, as recommended by the
Advisory Group on Administrative Expenses.
Health maintenance organizations must submit this information, including
administrative expenses for dental services, using the reporting template
provided by the commissioner of health.
(b) Every health maintenance
organization must allocate investment income based on cumulative net income
over time by business line or product and must submit this information,
including investment income for dental services, using the reporting template
provided by the commissioner of health.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective January 1, 2012.
Sec. 2. [62D.31]
ADVISORY GROUP ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.
Subdivision
1. Establishment. The
Advisory Group on Administrative Expenses is established to make
recommendations on the development of consistent guidelines and reporting
requirements, including development of a reporting template, for health
maintenance organizations and county-based purchasers that participate in
publicly funded programs.
Subd. 2. Membership. The membership of the advisory group
shall be comprised of the following, who serve at the pleasure of their
appointing authority:
(1) the
commissioner of health or the commissioner's designee;
(2) the
commissioner of human services or the commissioner's designee;
(3) the
commissioner of commerce or the commissioner's designee; and
(4)
representatives of health maintenance organizations and county-based purchasers
appointed by the commissioner of health.
Subd. 3. Administration. The commissioner of health shall
convene the first meeting of the advisory group by September 1, 2010, and shall
provide administrative support and staff.
The commissioner of health may contract with a consultant to provide
professional assistance and expertise to the advisory group.
Subd. 4. Recommendations. The Advisory Group on Administrative
Expenses must report its recommendations, including any proposed legislation
necessary to implement the recommendations, to the commissioner of health and
to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees and
divisions with jurisdiction over health policy and finance by July 1, 2011.
Subd. 5. Expiration. This section expires after submission
of the report required under subdivision 4 or June 30, 2012, whichever is
sooner.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
62J.495, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Definitions. (a) "Certified electronic health
record technology" means an electronic health record that is certified
pursuant to section 3001(c)(5) of the HITECH Act to meet the standards and
implementation specifications adopted under section 3004 as applicable.
(b)
"Commissioner" means the commissioner of health.
(c)
"Pharmaceutical electronic data intermediary" means any entity that
provides the infrastructure to connect computer systems or other electronic
devices utilized by prescribing practitioners with those used by pharmacies,
health plans, third-party administrators, and pharmacy benefit managers in
order to facilitate the secure transmission of electronic prescriptions, refill
authorization requests, communications, and other prescription-related
information between such entities.
(d) "HITECH Act"
means the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act in
division A, title XIII and division B, title IV of the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009, including federal regulations adopted under that
act.
(e)
"Interoperable electronic health record" means an electronic health
record that securely exchanges health information with another electronic
health record system that meets requirements specified in subdivision 3, and
national requirements for certification under the HITECH Act.
(f)
"Qualified electronic health record" means an electronic record of
health-related information on an individual that includes patient demographic
and clinical health information and has the capacity to:
(1) provide
clinical decision support;
(2) support
physician order entry;
(3) capture
and query information relevant to health care quality; and
(4)
exchange electronic health information with, and integrate such information
from, other sources.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
62J.495, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Interoperable
electronic health record requirements. To
meet the requirements of subdivision 1, hospitals and health care providers
must meet the following criteria when implementing an interoperable electronic
health records system within their hospital system or clinical practice
setting.
(a) The
electronic health record must be a qualified electronic health record.
(b) The
electronic health record must be certified by the Office of the National
Coordinator pursuant to the HITECH Act. This
criterion only applies to hospitals and health care providers only if a
certified electronic health record product for the provider's particular
practice setting is available. This
criterion shall be considered met if a hospital or health care provider is
using an electronic health records system that has been certified within the
last three years, even if a more current version of the system has been
certified within the three-year period.
(c) The
electronic health record must meet the standards established according to
section 3004 of the HITECH Act as applicable.
(d) The
electronic health record must have the ability to generate information on
clinical quality measures and other measures reported under sections 4101,
4102, and 4201 of the HITECH Act.
(e) The
electronic health record system must be connected to a state-certified health
information organization either directly or through a connection facilitated by
a state-certified health data intermediary as defined in section 62J.498.
(e) (f) A health
care provider who is a prescriber or dispenser of legend drugs must have an
electronic health record system that meets the requirements of section 62J.497.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
62J.495, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. State
agency information system. Development
of a state agency information system necessary to implement this section is
subject to the authority of the Office of Enterprise Technology in chapter 16E,
including, but not limited to:
(1) evaluation and approval of
the system as specified in section 16E.03, subdivisions 3 and 4;
(2) review
of the system to ensure compliance with security policies, guidelines, and
standards as specified in section 16E.03, subdivision 7; and
(3)
assurance that the system complies with accessibility standards developed under
section 16E.03, subdivision 9.
Sec. 6. [62J.498]
HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. The
following definitions apply to sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982:
(a)
"Clinical transaction" means any meaningful use transaction that is
not covered by section 62J.536.
(b)
"Commissioner" means the commissioner of health.
(c)
"Direct health information exchange" means the electronic
transmission of health-related information through a direct connection between
the electronic health record systems of health care providers without the use
of a health data intermediary.
(d)
"Health care provider" or "provider" means a health care
provider or provider as defined in section 62J.03, subdivision 8.
(e)
"Health data intermediary" means an entity that provides the
infrastructure to connect computer systems or other electronic devices used by
health care providers, laboratories, pharmacies, health plans, third-party
administrators, or pharmacy benefit managers to facilitate the secure transmission
of health information, including pharmaceutical electronic data intermediaries
as defined in section 62J.495. This does
not include health care providers engaged in a direct health information
exchange.
(f)
"Health information exchange" means the electronic transmission of
health-related information between organizations according to nationally
recognized standards.
(g)
"Health information exchange service provider" means a health data
intermediary or health information organization that has been issued a
certificate of authority by the commissioner under section 62J.4981.
(h)
"Health information organization" means an organization that
oversees, governs, and facilitates the exchange of health-related information
among organizations according to nationally recognized standards.
(i)
"HITECH Act" means the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health Act as defined in section 62J.495.
(j)
"Major participating entity" means:
(1) a participating
entity that receives compensation for services that is greater than 30 percent
of the health information organization's gross annual revenues from the health
information exchange service provider;
(2) a
participating entity providing administrative, financial, or management
services to the health information organization, if the total payment for all
services provided by the participating entity exceeds three percent of the
gross revenue of the health information organization; and
(3) a participating entity
that nominates or appoints 30 percent or more of the board of directors of the
health information organization.
(k)
"Meaningful use" means use of certified electronic health record
technology that includes e-prescribing, and is connected in a manner that
provides for the electronic exchange of health information and used for the
submission of clinical quality measures as established by the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Minnesota Department of Human Services
pursuant to sections 4101, 4102, and 4201 of the HITECH Act.
(l)
"Meaningful use transaction" means an electronic transaction that a
health care provider must exchange to receive Medicare or Medicaid incentives
or avoid Medicare penalties pursuant to sections 4101, 4102, and 4201 of the
HITECH Act.
(m)
"Participating entity" means any of the following persons, health
care providers, companies, or other organizations with which a health
information organization or health data intermediary has contracts or other
agreements for the provision of health information exchange service providers:
(1) a
health care facility licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.56, a nursing home
licensed under sections 144A.02 to 144A.10, and any other health care facility
otherwise licensed under the laws of this state or registered with the
commissioner;
(2) a
health care provider, and any other health care professional otherwise licensed
under the laws of this state or registered with the commissioner;
(3) a
group, professional corporation, or other organization that provides the
services of individuals or entities identified in clause (2), including but not
limited to a medical clinic, a medical group, a home health care agency, an
urgent care center, and an emergent care center;
(4) a health
plan as defined in section 62A.011, subdivision 3; and
(5) a state
agency as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 17.
(n)
"Reciprocal agreement" means an arrangement in which two or more
health information exchange service providers agree to share in-kind services
and resources to allow for the pass-through of meaningful use transactions.
(o)
"State-certified health data intermediary" means a health data
intermediary that:
(1)
provides a subset of the meaningful use transaction capabilities necessary for
hospitals and providers to achieve meaningful use of electronic health records;
(2) is not
exclusively engaged in the exchange of meaningful use transactions covered by
section 62J.536; and
(3) has
been issued a certificate of authority to operate in Minnesota.
(p)
"State-certified health information organization" means a nonprofit
health information organization that provides transaction capabilities
necessary to fully support clinical transactions required for meaningful use of
electronic health records that has been issued a certificate of authority to
operate in Minnesota.
Subd. 2. Health
information exchange oversight. (a)
The commissioner shall protect the public interest on matters pertaining to
health information exchange. The commissioner
shall:
(1) review and act on
applications from health data intermediaries and health information
organizations for certificates of authority to operate in Minnesota;
(2) provide
ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance with criteria established under
sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982;
(3) respond
to public complaints related to health information exchange services;
(4) take
enforcement actions as necessary, including the imposition of fines,
suspension, or revocation of certificates of authority as outlined in section
62J.4982;
(5) provide
a biannual report on the status of health information exchange services that
includes but is not limited to:
(i)
recommendations on actions necessary to ensure that health information exchange
services are adequate to meet the needs of Minnesota citizens and providers
statewide;
(ii)
recommendations on enforcement actions to ensure that health information
exchange service providers act in the public interest without causing
disruption in health information exchange services;
(iii)
recommendations on updates to criteria for obtaining certificates of authority
under this section; and
(iv)
recommendations on standard operating procedures for health information
exchange, including but not limited to the management of consumer preferences;
and
(6) other
duties necessary to protect the public interest.
(b) As part
of the application review process for certification under paragraph (a), prior
to issuing a certificate of authority, the commissioner shall:
(1) hold
public hearings that provide an adequate opportunity for participating entities
and consumers to provide feedback and recommendations on the application under
consideration. The commissioner shall
make all portions of the application classified as public data available to the
public at least ten days in advance of the hearing. The applicant shall participate in the
hearing by presenting an application overview and responding to questions from
interested parties;
(2) make
available all feedback and recommendations from the hearing available to the
public prior to issuing a certificate of authority; and
(3) consult
with hospitals, physicians, and other professionals eligible to receive
meaningful use incentive payments or are subject to penalties as established in
the HITECH Act, and their respective statewide associations, prior to issuing a
certificate of authority.
(c)(1) When
the commissioner is actively considering a suspension or revocation of a
certificate of authority as described in section 62J.4982, subdivision 3, all
investigatory data that are collected, created, or maintained related to the
suspension or revocation are classified as confidential data on individuals and
as protected nonpublic data in the case of data not on individuals.
(2) The
commissioner may disclose data classified as protected nonpublic or
confidential under this paragraph if disclosing the data will protect the
health or safety of patients.
(d) After the commissioner
makes a final determination regarding a suspension or revocation of a
certificate of authority, all minutes, orders for hearing, findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and the specification of the final disciplinary action, are
classified as public data.
Sec. 7. [62J.4981]
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE SERVICES.
Subdivision
1. Authority to require organizations to apply. The commissioner shall require an
entity providing health information exchange services to apply for a
certificate of authority under this section.
An applicant may continue to operate until the commissioner acts on the
application. If the application is
denied, the applicant is considered a health information organization whose
certificate of authority has been revoked under section 62J.4982, subdivision
2, paragraph (d).
Subd. 2. Certificate
of authority for health data intermediaries. (a) A health data intermediary that
provides health information exchange services for the transmission of one or
more clinical transactions necessary for hospitals, providers, or eligible
professionals to achieve meaningful use must be registered with the state and
comply with requirements established in this section.
(b)
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, any corporation organized to do so may
apply to the commissioner for a certificate of authority to establish and
operate as a health data intermediary in compliance with this section. No person shall establish or operate a health
data intermediary in this state, nor sell or offer to sell, or solicit offers
to purchase or receive advance or periodic consideration in conjunction with a
health data intermediary contract unless the organization has a certificate of
authority or has an application under active consideration under this section.
(c) In issuing
the certificate of authority, the commissioner shall determine whether the
applicant for the certificate of authority has demonstrated that the applicant
meets the following minimum criteria:
(1) can
interoperate with at least one state-certified health information organization;
(2) can
provide an option for Minnesota entities to connect to their services through
at least one state-certified health information organization;
(3) has a
record locator service as defined in section 144.291, subdivision 2, paragraph
(i), that is compliant with the requirements of section 144.293, subdivision 8,
when conducting meaningful use transactions; and
(4) holds
reciprocal agreements with at least one state-certified health information
organization to enable access to record locator services to find patient data,
and for the transmission and receipt of meaningful use transactions consistent
with the format and content required by national standards established by
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Reciprocal agreements must meet the requirements established in
subdivision 5.
Subd. 3. Certificate
of authority for health information organizations. (a) A health information organization
that provides all electronic capabilities for the transmission of clinical
transactions necessary for meaningful use of electronic health records must
obtain a certificate of authority from the commissioner and demonstrate
compliance with the criteria in paragraph (c).
(b)
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, a nonprofit corporation organized to
do so may apply for a certificate of authority to establish and operate a
health information organization under this section. No person shall establish or operate a health
information organization in this state, or sell or offer to sell, or solicit
offers to purchase or receive advance or periodic consideration in conjunction
with a health information organization or health information contract unless
the organization has a certificate of authority under this section.
(c) In issuing the certificate
of authority, the commissioner shall determine whether the applicant for the
certificate of authority has demonstrated that the applicant meets the
following minimum criteria:
(1) the
entity is a legally established, nonprofit organization;
(2) has
appropriate insurance, including liability insurance, for the operation of the
health information organization is in place and sufficient to protect the
interest of the public and participating entities;
(3) has
strategic and operational plans that clearly address how the organization will
expand technical capacity of the health information organization to support
providers in achieving meaningful use of electronic health records over time;
(4) the
entity addresses the parameters to be used with participating entities and
other health information organizations for meaningful use transactions,
compliance with Minnesota law, and interstate health information exchange in
trust agreements;
(5) the
entity's board of directors is comprised of members that broadly represent the
health information organization's participating entities and consumers;
(6) the
entity maintains a professional staff responsible to the board of directors
with the capacity to ensure accountability to the organization's mission;
(7) the
entity is compliant with criteria established under the Health Information
Exchange Accreditation Program of the Electronic Healthcare Network
Accreditation Commission (EHNAC) or equivalent criteria established by the commissioner;
(8) the
entity maintains a record locator service as defined in section 144.291,
subdivision 2, paragraph (i), that is compliant with the requirements of
section 144.293, subdivision 8, when conducting meaningful use transactions;
(9) the organization
demonstrates interoperability with all other state-certified health information
organizations using nationally recognized standards;
(10) the
organization demonstrates compliance with all privacy and security requirements
required by state and federal law; and
(11) the
organization uses financial policies and procedures consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles and has an independent audit of the
organization's financials on an annual basis.
(d) Health
information organizations that have obtained a certificate of authority must:
(1) meet
the requirements established for connecting to the Nationwide Health
Information Network (NHIN) within the federally mandated timeline or within a
time frame established by the commissioner and published in the State Register. If the state timeline for implementation
varies from the federal timeline, the State Register notice shall include an
explanation for the variation;
(2)
annually submit strategic and operational plans for review by the commissioner
that address:
(i)
increasing adoption rates to include a sufficient number of participating
entities to achieve financial sustainability; and
(ii) progress in achieving
objectives included in previously submitted strategic and operational plans
across the following domains: business
and technical operations, technical infrastructure, legal and policy issues,
finance, and organizational governance;
(3) develop
and maintain a business plan that addresses:
(i) plans
for ensuring the necessary capacity to support meaningful use transactions;
(ii)
approach for attaining financial sustainability, including public and private
financing strategies, and rate structures;
(iii) rates
of adoption, utilization, and transaction volume, and mechanisms to support
health information exchange; and
(iv) an
explanation of methods employed to address the needs of community clinics,
critical access hospitals, and free clinics in accessing health information
exchange services;
(4)
annually submit a rate plan outlining fee structures for health information
exchange services for approval by the commissioner. The commissioner shall approve the rate plan
if it:
(i)
distributes costs equitably among users of health information services;
(ii)
provides predictable costs for participating entities;
(iii)
covers all costs associated with conducting the full range of meaningful use
clinical transactions, including access to health information retrieved through
other state-certified health information exchange service providers; and
(iv)
provides for a predictable revenue stream for the health information
organization and generates sufficient resources to maintain operating costs and
develop technical infrastructure necessary to serve the public interest;
(5) enter
into reciprocal agreements with all other state-certified health information
organizations to enable access to record locator services to find patient data,
and transmission and receipt of meaningful use transactions consistent with the
format and content required by national standards established by Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services. Reciprocal
agreements must meet the requirements in subdivision 5; and
(6) comply
with additional requirements for the certification or recertification of health
information organizations that may be established by the commissioner.
Subd. 4. Application
for certificate of authority for health information exchange service providers. (a) Each application for a certificate
of authority shall be in a form prescribed by the commissioner and verified by
an officer or authorized representative of the applicant. Each application shall include the following:
(1) a copy
of the basic organizational document, if any, of the applicant and of each major
participating entity, such as the articles of incorporation, or other
applicable documents, and all amendments to it;
(2) a list
of the names, addresses, and official positions of the following:
(i) all
members of the board of directors and the principal officers and, if
applicable, shareholders of the applicant organization; and
(ii) all members of the board
of directors and the principal officers of each major participating entity and,
if applicable, each shareholder beneficially owning more than ten percent of
any voting stock of the major participating entity;
(3) the name
and address of each participating entity and the agreed-upon duration of each
contract or agreement if applicable;
(4) a copy
of each standard agreement or contract intended to bind the participating
entities and the health information organization. Contractual provisions shall be consistent
with the purposes of this section in regard to the services to be performed
under the standard agreement or contract, the manner in which payment for
services is determined, the nature and extent of responsibilities to be
retained by the health information organization, and contractual termination
provisions;
(5) a copy
of each contract intended to bind major participating entities and the health
information organization. Contract
information filed with the commissioner under this section shall be nonpublic
as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 9;
(6) a
statement generally describing the health information organization, its health
information exchange contracts, facilities, and personnel, including a
statement describing the manner in which the applicant proposes to provide
participants with comprehensive health information exchange services;
(7)
financial statements showing the applicant's assets, liabilities, and sources
of financial support, including a copy of the applicant's most recent certified
financial statement;
(8)
strategic and operational plans that specifically address how the organization
will expand technical capacity of the health information organization to
support providers in achieving meaningful use of electronic health records over
time, a description of the proposed method of marketing the services, a
schedule of proposed charges, and a financial plan that includes a three-year
projection of the expenses and income and other sources of future capital;
(9) a
statement reasonably describing the geographic area or areas to be served and
the type or types of participants to be served;
(10) a
description of the complaint procedures to be used as required under this
section;
(11) a
description of the mechanism by which participating entities will have an
opportunity to participate in matters of policy and operation;
(12) a copy
of any pertinent agreements between the health information organization and
insurers, including liability insurers, demonstrating coverage is in place;
(13) a copy
of the conflict of interest policy that applies to all members of the board of
directors and the principal officers of the health information organization;
and
(14) other
information as the commissioner may reasonably require to be provided.
(b) Thirty
days after the receipt of the application for a certificate of authority, the
commissioner shall determine whether or not the application submitted meets the
requirements for completion in paragraph (a), and notify the applicant of any
further information required for the application to be processed.
(c) Ninety
days after the receipt of a complete application for a certificate of
authority, the commissioner shall issue a certificate of authority to the
applicant if the commissioner determines that the applicant meets the minimum
criteria requirements of subdivision 2 for health data intermediaries or subdivision
3 for health information organizations. If
the commissioner determines that the applicant is not qualified, the
commissioner shall notify the applicant and specify the reasons for
disqualification.
(d) Upon being granted a
certificate of authority to operate as a health information organization, the
organization must operate in compliance with the provisions of this section. Noncompliance may result in the imposition of
a fine or the suspension or revocation of the certificate of authority
according to section 62J.4982.
Subd. 5. Reciprocal
agreements between health information exchange entities. (a) Reciprocal agreements between two
health information organizations or between a health information organization
and a health data intermediary must include a fair and equitable model for
charges between the entities that:
(1) does
not impede the secure transmission of transactions necessary to achieve
meaningful use;
(2) does
not charge a fee for the exchange of meaningful use transactions transmitted
according to nationally recognized standards where no additional value-added
service is rendered to the sending or receiving health information organization
or health data intermediary either directly or on behalf of the client;
(3) is
consistent with fair market value and proportionately reflects the value-added
services accessed as a result of the agreement; and
(4)
prevents health care stakeholders from being charged multiple times for the
same service.
(b)
Reciprocal agreements must include comparable quality of service standards that
ensure equitable levels of services.
(c)
Reciprocal agreements are subject to review and approval by the commissioner.
(d) Nothing
in this section precludes a state-certified health information organization or
state-certified health data intermediary from entering into contractual
agreements for the provision of value-added services beyond meaningful use.
(e) The
commissioner of human services or health, when providing access to data or
services through a certified health information organization, must offer the
same data or services directly through any certified health information
organization at the same pricing, if the health information organization pays
for all connection costs to the state data or service. For all external connectivity to the
respective agencies through existing or future information exchange
implementations, the respective agency shall establish the required
connectivity methods as well as protocol standards to be utilized.
Subd. 6. State
participation in health information exchange. A state agency that connects to a
health information exchange service provider for the purpose of exchanging
meaningful use transactions must ensure that the contracted health information
exchange service provider has reciprocal agreements in place as required by
this section. The reciprocal agreements
must provide equal access to information supplied by the agency and necessary
for meaningful use by the participating entities of the other health
information service providers.
Sec. 8. [62J.4982]
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY; COMPLIANCE.
Subdivision
1. Penalties and enforcement.
(a) The commissioner may, for any violation of statute or rule
applicable to a health information exchange service provider, levy an
administrative penalty in an amount up to $25,000 for each violation. In determining the level of an administrative
penalty, the commissioner shall consider the following factors:
(1) the
number of participating entities affected by the violation;
(2) the
effect of the violation on participating entities' access to health information
exchange services;
(3) if only one participating
entity is affected, the effect of the violation on the patients of that entity;
(4) whether
the violation is an isolated incident or part of a pattern of violations;
(5) the
economic benefits derived by the health information organization or a health
data intermediary by virtue of the violation;
(6) whether
the violation hindered or facilitated an individual's ability to obtain health
care;
(7) whether
the violation was intentional;
(8) whether
the violation was beyond the direct control of the health information exchange
service provider;
(9) any
history of prior compliance with the provisions of this section, including
violations;
(10)
whether and to what extent the health information exchange service provider
attempted to correct previous violations;
(11) how
the health information exchange service provider responded to technical assistance
from the commissioner provided in the context of a compliance effort; and
(12) the
financial condition of the health information exchange service provider
including, but not limited to, whether the health information exchange service
provider had financial difficulties that affected its ability to comply or
whether the imposition of an administrative monetary penalty would jeopardize
the ability of the health information exchange service provider to continue to
deliver health information exchange services.
Reasonable
notice in writing shall be given to the health information exchange service
provider of the intent to levy the penalty and the reasons for them. A health information exchange service
provider may have 15 days within which to contest whether the finding of facts
constitute a violation of this section and section 62J.4981, according to the
contested case and judicial review provisions of sections 14.57 to 14.69.
(b) If the
commissioner has reason to believe that a violation of this section or section
62J.4981 has occurred or is likely, the commissioner may confer with the
persons involved before commencing action under subdivision 2. The commissioner may notify the health
information exchange service provider and the representatives, or other persons
who appear to be involved in the suspected violation, to arrange a voluntary
conference with the alleged violators or their authorized representatives. The purpose of the conference is to attempt
to learn the facts about the suspected violation and if it appears that a
violation has occurred or is threatened, to find a way to correct or prevent it. The conference is not governed by any formal
procedural requirements and may be conducted as the commissioner considers
appropriate.
(c) The
commissioner may issue an order directing a health information exchange service
provider or a representative of a health information exchange service provider
to cease and desist from engaging in any act or practice in violation of this
section and section 62J.4981.
(d) Within
20 days after service of the order to cease and desist, a health information
exchange service provider may contest whether the finding of facts constitutes
a violation of this section and section 62J.4981 according to the contested
case and judicial review provisions of sections 14.57 to 14.69.
(e) In the
event of noncompliance with a cease and desist order issued under this
subdivision, the commissioner may institute a proceeding to obtain injunctive
relief or other appropriate relief in Ramsey County District Court.
Subd. 2.
(1) the
health information exchange service provider is operating significantly in
contravention of its basic organizational document, or in a manner contrary to
that described in and reasonably inferred from any other information submitted
under section 62J.4981, unless amendments to the submissions have been filed
with and approved by the commissioner;
(2) the
health information exchange service provider is unable to fulfill its
obligations to furnish comprehensive health information exchange services as
required under its health information exchange contract;
(3) the
health information exchange service provider is no longer financially solvent
or may not reasonably be expected to meet its obligations to participating
entities;
(4) the
health information exchange service provider has failed to implement the
complaint system in a manner designed to reasonably resolve valid complaints;
(5) the
health information exchange service provider, or any person acting with its
sanction, has advertised or merchandised its services in an untrue, misleading,
deceptive, or unfair manner;
(6) the
continued operation of the health information exchange service provider would
be hazardous to its participating entities or the patients served by the
participating entities; or
(7) the
health information exchange service provider has otherwise failed to
substantially comply with section 62J.4981 or with any other statute or
administrative rule applicable to health information exchange service
providers, or has submitted false information in any report required under
sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982.
(b) A
certificate of authority shall be suspended or revoked only after meeting the
requirements of subdivision 3.
(c) If the
certificate of authority of a health information exchange service provider is
suspended, the health information exchange service provider shall not, during
the period of suspension, enroll any additional participating entities, and
shall not engage in any advertising or solicitation.
(d) If the
certificate of authority of a health information exchange service provider is
revoked, the organization shall proceed, immediately following the effective
date of the order of revocation, to wind up its affairs and shall conduct no
further business except as necessary to the orderly conclusion of the affairs
of the organization. The organization
shall engage in no further advertising or solicitation. The commissioner may, by written order,
permit further operation of the organization as the commissioner finds to be in
the best interest of participating entities, to the end that participating
entities will be given the greatest practical opportunity to access continuing
health information exchange services.
Subd. 3. Denial,
suspension, and revocation; administrative procedures. (a) When the commissioner has cause to
believe that grounds for the denial, suspension, or revocation of a certificate
of authority exists, the commissioner shall notify the health information
exchange service provider in writing stating the grounds for denial,
suspension, or revocation and setting a time within 20 days for a hearing on
the matter.
(b) After a
hearing before the commissioner at which the health information exchange service
provider may respond to the grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation, or
upon the failure of the health information exchange service provider to appear
at the hearing, the commissioner shall take action as deemed necessary and
shall issue written findings that shall be mailed to the health information
exchange service provider.
(c) If suspension, revocation,
or an administrative penalty is proposed according to this section, the
commissioner must deliver, or send by certified mail with return receipt
requested, to the health information exchange service provider written notice
of the commissioner's intent to impose a penalty. This notice of proposed determination must
include:
(1) a
reference to the statutory basis for the penalty;
(2) a
description of the findings of fact regarding the violations with respect to
which the penalty is proposed;
(3) the
nature and amount of the proposed penalty;
(4) any
circumstances described in subdivision 1, paragraph (a), that were considered
in determining the amount of the proposed penalty;
(5)
instructions for responding to the notice, including a statement of the health
information exchange service provider's right to a contested case proceeding
and a statement that failure to request a contested case proceeding within 30
calendar days permits the imposition of the proposed penalty; and
(6) the
address to which the contested case proceeding request must be sent.
Subd. 4. Coordination. (a) To the extent possible when
implementing sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982, the commissioner shall seek the
advice of the Minnesota e-Health Advisory Committee, in the review and update
of criteria for the certification and recertification of health information
exchange service providers.
(b) By
January 1, 2011, the commissioner shall report to the governor and the chairs
of the senate and house of representatives committees having jurisdiction over
health information policy issues on the status of the health information
exchange in Minnesota and provide recommendations on further action necessary
to facilitate the secure electronic movement of health information among health
providers that will enable Minnesota providers and hospitals to meet meaningful
use exchange requirements.
Subd. 5. Fees
and monetary penalties. (a)
Every health information exchange service provider subject to this section and
section 62J.4981 shall be assessed fees as follows:
(1) filing
an application for certificate of authority to operate as a health information
organization, $10,500;
(2) filing
an application for certificate of authority to operate as a health data
intermediary, $7,000;
(3) annual
health information organization certificate fee, $14,000;
(4) annual
health data intermediary certificate fee, $7,000; and
(5) fees
for other filings, as specified by rule.
(b)
Administrative monetary penalties imposed under this subdivision shall be
deposited into a revolving fund and are appropriated to the commissioner for
the purposes of sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62Q.19,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Designation. (a) The commissioner shall designate
essential community providers. The
criteria for essential community provider designation shall be the following:
(1) a demonstrated ability to
integrate applicable supportive and stabilizing services with medical care for
uninsured persons and high-risk and special needs populations, underserved, and
other special needs populations; and
(2) a commitment
to serve low-income and underserved populations by meeting the following
requirements:
(i) has
nonprofit status in accordance with chapter 317A;
(ii) has
tax exempt status in accordance with the Internal Revenue Service Code, section
501(c)(3);
(iii)
charges for services on a sliding fee schedule based on current poverty income
guidelines; and
(iv) does
not restrict access or services because of a client's financial limitation;
(3) status
as a local government unit as defined in section 62D.02, subdivision 11, a
hospital district created or reorganized under sections 447.31 to 447.37, an
Indian tribal government, an Indian health service unit, or a community health
board as defined in chapter 145A;
(4) a
former state hospital that specializes in the treatment of cerebral palsy,
spina bifida, epilepsy, closed head injuries, specialized orthopedic problems,
and other disabling conditions; or
(5) a sole
community hospital. For these rural
hospitals, the essential community provider designation applies to all health
services provided, including both inpatient and outpatient services. For purposes of this section, "sole
community hospital" means a rural hospital that:
(i) is
eligible to be classified as a sole community hospital according to Code of
Federal Regulations, title 42, section 412.92, or is located in a community
with a population of less than 5,000 and located more than 25 miles from a like
hospital currently providing acute short-term services;
(ii) has
experienced net operating income losses in two of the previous three most
recent consecutive hospital fiscal years for which audited financial
information is available; and
(iii)
consists of 40 or fewer licensed beds; or
(6) a birth
center licensed under section 144.615.
(b) Prior
to designation, the commissioner shall publish the names of all applicants in
the State Register. The public shall
have 30 days from the date of publication to submit written comments to the
commissioner on the application. No
designation shall be made by the commissioner until the 30-day period has
expired.
(c) The
commissioner may designate an eligible provider as an essential community
provider for all the services offered by that provider or for specific services
designated by the commissioner.
(d) For the
purpose of this subdivision, supportive and stabilizing services include at a
minimum, transportation, child care, cultural, and linguistic services where
appropriate.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.226,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Birth
record surcharge. (a) In
addition to any fee prescribed under subdivision 1, there shall be a
nonrefundable surcharge of $3 for each certified birth or stillbirth record and
for a certification that the vital record cannot be found. The local or state registrar shall forward
this amount to the commissioner of management and budget for deposit into the
account for the children's trust fund for the prevention of child abuse
established under section 256E.22. This
surcharge shall not be charged under those circumstances in which no fee for a
certified birth or stillbirth record is permitted under subdivision 1,
paragraph (a). Upon certification by the
commissioner of management and budget that the assets in that fund exceed
$20,000,000, this surcharge shall be discontinued.
(b) In
addition to any fee prescribed under subdivision 1, there shall be a
nonrefundable surcharge of $10 for each certified birth record. The local or state registrar shall forward
this amount to the commissioner of finance for deposit in the general fund for
the Minnesota Birth Defects Information System established under section
144.2215. This surcharge shall not be
charged under those circumstances in which no fee for a certified birth record
is permitted under subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 11. [144.615]
BIRTH CENTERS.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. (a)
For purposes of this section, the following definitions have the meanings given them.
(b)
"Birth center" means a facility licensed for the primary purpose of
performing low-risk deliveries that is not a hospital or licensed as part of a
hospital and where births are planned to occur away from the mother's usual
residence following a low-risk pregnancy.
(c)
"CABC" means the Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers.
(d)
"Low-risk pregnancy" means a normal, uncomplicated prenatal course as
determined by documentation of adequate prenatal care and the anticipation of a
normal uncomplicated labor and birth, as defined by reasonable and generally
accepted criteria adopted by professional groups for maternal, fetal, and
neonatal health care.
Subd. 2. License
required. (a) Beginning
January 1, 2011, no birth center shall be established, operated, or maintained
in the state without first obtaining a license from the commissioner of health
according to this section.
(b) A
license issued under this section is not transferable or assignable and is
subject to suspension or revocation at any time for failure to comply with this
section.
(c) A birth
center licensed under this section shall not assert, represent, offer, provide,
or imply that the center is or may render care or services other than the
services it is permitted to render within the scope of the license or the
accreditation issued.
(d) The
license must be conspicuously posted in an area where patients are admitted.
Subd. 3. Temporary
license. For new birth
centers planning to begin operations after January 1, 2011, the commissioner
may issue a temporary license to the birth center that is valid for a period of
six months from the date of issuance. The
birth center must submit to the commissioner an application and applicable fee
for licensure as required under subdivision 4.
The application must include the information required in subdivision 4,
clauses (1) to (3) and (5) to (7), and documentation that the birth center has
submitted an application for accreditation to the CABC. Upon receipt of accreditation from the CABC,
the birth center must submit to the commissioner the information required in
subdivision 4, clause (4), and the applicable fee under subdivision 8. The commissioner shall issue a new license.
Subd. 4. Application. An application for a license to
operate a birth center and the applicable fee under subdivision 8 must be
submitted to the commissioner on a form provided by the commissioner and must
contain:
(1) the name of the applicant;
(2) the
site location of the birth center;
(3) the
name of the person in charge of the center;
(4)
documentation that the accreditation described under subdivision 6 has been
issued, including the effective date and the expiration date of the
accreditation, and the date of the last site visit by the CABC;
(5) the
number of patients the birth center is capable of serving at a given time;
(6) the
names and license numbers, if applicable, of the health care professionals on
staff at the birth center; and
(7) any
other information the commissioner deems necessary.
Subd. 5. Suspension,
revocation, and refusal to renew. The
commissioner may refuse to grant or renew, or may suspend or revoke, a license
on any of the grounds described under section 144.55, subdivision 6, paragraph
(a), clause (2), (3), or (4), or upon the loss of accreditation by the CABC. The applicant or licensee is entitled to
notice and a hearing as described under section 144.55, subdivision 7, and a
new license may be issued after proper inspection of the birth center has been
conducted.
Subd. 6. Standards
for licensure. (a) To be
eligible for licensure under this section, a birth center must be accredited by
the CABC or must obtain accreditation within six months of the date of the
application for licensure. If the birth
center loses its accreditation, the birth center must immediately notify the
commissioner.
(b) The
center must have procedures in place specifying criteria by which risk status
will be established and applied to each woman at admission and during labor.
(c) Upon
request, the birth center shall provide the commissioner of health with any
material submitted by the birth center to the CABC as part of the accreditation
process, including the accreditation application, the self-evaluation report,
the accreditation decision letter from the CABC, and any reports from the CABC
following a site visit.
Subd. 7. Limitations
of services. (a) The
following limitations apply to the services performed at a birth center:
(1)
surgical procedures must be limited to those normally accomplished during an
uncomplicated birth, including episiotomy and repair;
(2) no
abortions may be administered; and
(3) no
general or regional anesthesia may be administered.
(b)
Notwithstanding paragraph (a), local anesthesia may be administered at a birth
center if the administration of the anesthetic is performed within the scope of
practice of a health care professional.
Subd. 8. Fees. (a) The biennial license fee for a
birth center is $365.
(b) The
temporary license fee is $365.
(c) Fees
shall be collected and deposited according to section 144.122.
Subd. 9.
(b) A
temporary license issued under subdivision 3 expires six months from the date
of issue, and may be renewed for one additional six-month period.
(c) An
application for renewal shall be submitted at least 60 days prior to expiration
of the license on forms prescribed by the commissioner of health.
Subd. 10. Records. All health records maintained on each
client by a birth center are subject to sections 144.292 to 144.298.
Subd. 11. Report. (a) The commissioner of health, in
consultation with the commissioner of human services and representatives of the
licensed birth centers, the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Minnesota Hospital
Association, and the Minnesota Ambulance Association, shall evaluate the quality
of care and outcomes for services provided in licensed birth centers,
including, but not limited to, the utilization of services provided at a birth
center, the outcomes of care provided to both mothers and newborns, and the
numbers of transfers to other health care facilities that are required and the
reasons for the transfers. The
commissioner shall work with the birth centers to establish a process to gather
and analyze the data within protocols that protect the confidentiality of
patient identification.
(b) The
commissioner of health shall report the findings of the evaluation to the
legislature by January 15, 2014.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.651,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this section,
"patient" means a person who is admitted to an acute care inpatient
facility for a continuous period longer than 24 hours, for the purpose of
diagnosis or treatment bearing on the physical or mental health of that person. For purposes of subdivisions 4 to 9, 12, 13,
15, 16, and 18 to 20, "patient" also means a person who receives
health care services at an outpatient surgical center or at a birth center
licensed under section 144.615. "Patient"
also means a minor who is admitted to a residential program as defined in
section 253C.01. For purposes of
subdivisions 1, 3 to 16, 18, 20 and 30, "patient" also means any
person who is receiving mental health treatment on an outpatient basis or in a
community support program or other community-based program. "Resident" means a person who is
admitted to a nonacute care facility including extended care facilities,
nursing homes, and boarding care homes for care required because of prolonged
mental or physical illness or disability, recovery from injury or disease, or
advancing age. For purposes of all
subdivisions except subdivisions 28 and 29, "resident" also means a
person who is admitted to a facility licensed as a board and lodging facility
under Minnesota Rules, parts 4625.0100 to 4625.2355, or a supervised living
facility under Minnesota Rules, parts 4665.0100 to 4665.9900, and which
operates a rehabilitation program licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts
9530.4100 to 9530.4450.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.9504, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 12. Blood
lead level guidelines. (a) By
January 1, 2011, the commissioner must revise clinical and case management
guidelines to include recommendations for protective health actions and
follow-up services when a child's blood lead level exceeds five micrograms of
lead per deciliter of blood. The revised
guidelines must be implemented to the extent possible using available
resources.
(b) In
revising the clinical and case management guidelines for blood lead levels
greater than five micrograms of lead per deciliter of blood under this
subdivision, the commissioner of health must consult with a statewide
organization representing physicians, the public health department of
Minneapolis and other public health departments, and a nonprofit organization
with expertise in lead abatement.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144A.51,
subdivision 5, is amended to read: