Go to Part 2 or Part 1


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11217


 

      Speaker pro tempore Bigham called Sertich to the Chair.

 

 

REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND

LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION

 

      Sertich from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bills to be placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Tuesday, May 4, 2010:

 

      H. F. No. 2614; S. F. Nos. 3027 and 525; H. F. Nos. 2116 and 2037; and S. F. Nos. 2510 and 2974.

 

 

CALENDAR FOR THE DAY

 

 

      S. F. No. 3027 was reported to the House.

 

 

      Huntley moved to amend S. F. No. 3027, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

      Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3237, the third engrossment:

 

"ARTICLE 1

 

INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PLAN SERVICES

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.0625, subdivision 26, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 26.  Special education services.  (a) Medical assistance covers medical services identified in a recipient's individualized education plan and covered under the medical assistance state plan.  Covered services include occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech-language therapy, clinical psychological services, nursing services, school psychological services, school social work services, personal care assistants serving as management aides, assistive technology devices, transportation services, health assessments, and other services covered under the medical assistance state plan.  Mental health services eligible for medical assistance reimbursement must be provided or coordinated through a children's mental health collaborative where a collaborative exists if the child is included in the collaborative operational target population.  The provision or coordination of services does not require that the individual education plan be developed by the collaborative.

 

The services may be provided by a Minnesota school district that is enrolled as a medical assistance provider or its subcontractor, and only if the services meet all the requirements otherwise applicable if the service had been provided by a provider other than a school district, in the following areas:  medical necessity, physician's orders, documentation, personnel qualifications, and prior authorization requirements.  The nonfederal share of costs for services provided under this subdivision is the responsibility of the local school district as provided in section 125A.74.  Services listed in a child's individual education plan are eligible for medical assistance reimbursement only if those services meet criteria for federal financial participation under the Medicaid program.

 

(b) Approval of health-related services for inclusion in the individual education plan does not require prior authorization for purposes of reimbursement under this chapter.  The commissioner may require physician review and approval of the plan not more than once annually or upon any modification of the individual education plan that reflects a change in health-related services.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11218


 

(c) Services of a speech-language pathologist provided under this section are covered notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 9505.0390, subpart 1, item L, if the person:

 

(1) holds a masters degree in speech-language pathology;

 

(2) is licensed by the Minnesota Board of Teaching as an educational speech-language pathologist; and

 

(3) either has a certificate of clinical competence from the American Speech and Hearing Association, has completed the equivalent educational requirements and work experience necessary for the certificate or has completed the academic program and is acquiring supervised work experience to qualify for the certificate.

 

(d) Medical assistance coverage for medically necessary services provided under other subdivisions in this section may not be denied solely on the basis that the same or similar services are covered under this subdivision.

 

(e) The commissioner shall develop and implement package rates, bundled rates, or per diem rates for special education services under which separately covered services are grouped together and billed as a unit in order to reduce administrative complexity.

 

(f) The commissioner shall develop a cost-based payment structure for payment of these services.  Only costs reported through the designated Minnesota Department of Education data systems in distinct service categories qualify for inclusion in the cost-based payment structure.  The commissioner shall reimburse claims submitted based on an interim rate, and shall settle at a final rate once the department has determined it.  The commissioner shall notify the school district of the final rate.  The school district has 60 days to appeal the final rate.  To appeal the final rate, the school district shall file a written appeal request to the commissioner within 60 days of the date the final rate determination was mailed.  The appeal request shall specify (1) the disputed items and (2) the name and address of the person to contact regarding the appeal.

 

(g) Effective July 1, 2000, medical assistance services provided under an individual education plan or an individual family service plan by local school districts shall not count against medical assistance authorization thresholds for that child.

 

(h) Nursing services as defined in section 148.171, subdivision 15, and provided as an individual education plan health-related service, are eligible for medical assistance payment if they are otherwise a covered service under the medical assistance program.  Medical assistance covers the administration of prescription medications by a licensed nurse who is employed by or under contract with a school district when the administration of medications is identified in the child's individualized education plan.  The simple administration of medications alone is not covered under medical assistance when administered by a provider other than a school district or when it is not identified in the child's individualized education plan.

 

ARTICLE 2

 

STATE HEALTH ACCESS PROGRAM

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62Q.80, is amended to read:

 

62Q.80 COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH CARE COVERAGE PROGRAM. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Scope.  (a) A Any community-based health care initiative may develop and operate a community-based health care coverage program programs that offers offer to eligible individuals and their dependents the option of purchasing through their employer health care coverage on a fixed prepaid basis without meeting the requirements of chapter 60A, 62A, 62C, 62D, 62M, 62N, 62Q, or 62T, or 62U, or any other law or rule that applies to entities licensed under these chapters.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11219


 

(b) The Each initiative shall establish health outcomes to be achieved through the program programs and performance measurements in order to determine whether these outcomes have been met.  The outcomes must include, but are not limited to:

 

(1) a reduction in uncompensated care provided by providers participating in the community-based health network;

 

(2) an increase in the delivery of preventive health care services; and

 

(3) health improvement for enrollees with chronic health conditions through the management of these conditions.

 

In establishing performance measurements, the initiative shall use measures that are consistent with measures published by nonprofit Minnesota or national organizations that produce and disseminate health care quality measures.

 

(c) Any program established under this section shall not constitute a financial liability for the state, in that any financial risk involved in the operation or termination of the program shall be borne by the community-based initiative and the participating health care providers.

 

Subd. 1a.  Demonstration project.  The commissioner of health and the commissioner of human services shall award a demonstration project grant grants to a community-based health care initiative initiatives to develop and operate a community-based health care coverage program to operate within Carlton, Cook, Lake, and St. Louis Counties programs in Minnesota.  The demonstration project projects shall extend for five years and must comply with the requirements of this section.

 

Subd. 2.  Definitions.  For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: 

 

(a) "Community-based" means located in or primarily relating to the community of geographically contiguous political subdivisions, as determined by the board of a community-based health initiative that is served by the community-based health care coverage program. 

 

(b) "Community-based health care coverage program" or "program" means a program administered by a community-based health initiative that provides health care services through provider members of a community-based health network or combination of networks to eligible individuals and their dependents who are enrolled in the program.

 

(c) "Community-based health initiative" or "initiative" means a nonprofit corporation that is governed by a board that has at least 80 percent of its members residing in the community and includes representatives of the participating network providers and employers, or a county-based purchasing organization as defined in section 256B.692.

 

(d) "Community-based health network" means a contract-based network of health care providers organized by the community-based health initiative to provide or support the delivery of health care services to enrollees of the community-based health care coverage program on a risk-sharing or nonrisk-sharing basis.

 

(e) "Dependent" means an eligible employee's spouse or unmarried child who is under the age of 19 years.

 

Subd. 3.  Approval.  (a) Prior to the operation of a community-based health care coverage program, a community-based health initiative, defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (c), and receiving funds from the Department of Health, shall submit to the commissioner of health for approval the community-based health care coverage program developed by the initiative.  Each community-based health initiative as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11220


 

(c), and receiving State Health Access Program (SHAP) grant funding shall submit to the commissioner of human services for approval prior to its operation the community-based health care coverage programs developed by the initiatives.  The commissioner commissioners shall ensure that the each program meets the federal grant requirements and any requirements described in this section and is actuarially sound based on a review of appropriate records and methods utilized by the community-based health initiative in establishing premium rates for the community-based health care coverage program programs. 

 

(b) Prior to approval, the commissioner shall also ensure that:

 

(1) the benefits offered comply with subdivision 8 and that there are adequate numbers of health care providers participating in the community-based health network to deliver the benefits offered under the program;

 

(2) the activities of the program are limited to activities that are exempt under this section or otherwise from regulation by the commissioner of commerce;

 

(3) the complaint resolution process meets the requirements of subdivision 10; and

 

(4) the data privacy policies and procedures comply with state and federal law.

 

Subd. 4.  Establishment.  The initiative shall establish and operate upon approval by the commissioner commissioners of health a and human services community-based health care coverage program programs.  The operational structure established by the initiative shall include, but is not limited to: 

 

(1) establishing a process for enrolling eligible individuals and their dependents;

 

(2) collecting and coordinating premiums from enrollees and employers of enrollees;

 

(3) providing payment to participating providers;

 

(4) establishing a benefit set according to subdivision 8 and establishing premium rates and cost-sharing requirements;

 

(5) creating incentives to encourage primary care and wellness services; and

 

(6) initiating disease management services, as appropriate. 

 

Subd. 5.  Qualifying employees.  To be eligible for the community-based health care coverage program, an individual must: 

 

(1) reside in or work within the designated community-based geographic area served by the program;

 

(2) be employed by a qualifying employer or, be an employee's dependent, or be self-employed on a full‑time basis;

 

(3) not be enrolled in or have currently available health coverage, except for catastrophic health care coverage; and

 

(4) not be eligible for or enrolled in medical assistance, or general assistance medical care, and not be enrolled in MinnesotaCare, or Medicare.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11221


 

Subd. 6.  Qualifying employers.  (a) To qualify for participation in the community-based health care coverage program, an employer must: 

 

(1) employ at least one but no more than 50 employees at the time of initial enrollment in the program;

 

(2) pay its employees a median wage of $12.50 per hour that equals 350 percent of the federal poverty guidelines or less; and

 

(3) not have offered employer-subsidized health coverage to its employees for at least 12 months prior to the initial enrollment in the program.  For purposes of this section, "employer-subsidized health coverage" means health care coverage for which the employer pays at least 50 percent of the cost of coverage for the employee.

 

(b) To participate in the program, a qualifying employer agrees to: 

 

(1) offer health care coverage through the program to all eligible employees and their dependents regardless of health status;

 

(2) participate in the program for an initial term of at least one year;

 

(3) pay a percentage of the premium established by the initiative for the employee; and

 

(4) provide the initiative with any employee information deemed necessary by the initiative to determine eligibility and premium payments. 

 

Subd. 7.  Participating providers.  Any health care provider participating in the community-based health network must accept as payment in full the payment rate established by the initiative initiatives and may not charge to or collect from an enrollee any amount in access of this amount for any service covered under the program.

 

Subd. 8.  Coverage.  (a) The initiative initiatives shall establish the health care benefits offered through the community-based health care coverage program programs.  The benefits established shall include, at a minimum: 

 

(1) child health supervision services up to age 18, as defined under section 62A.047; and

 

(2) preventive services, including: 

 

(i) health education and wellness services;

 

(ii) health supervision, evaluation, and follow-up;

 

(iii) immunizations; and

 

(iv) early disease detection. 

 

(b) Coverage of health care services offered by the program may be limited to participating health care providers or health networks.  All services covered under the program programs must be services that are offered within the scope of practice of the participating health care providers. 

 

(c) The initiative initiatives may establish cost-sharing requirements.  Any co-payment or deductible provisions established may not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, disability, economic status, or length of enrollment in the program programs. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11222


 

(d) If any of the initiative initiatives amends or alters the benefits offered through the program from the initial offering, the that initiative must notify the commissioner commissioners of health and human services and all enrollees of the benefit change.

 

Subd. 9.  Enrollee information.  (a) The initiative initiatives must provide an individual or family who enrolls in the program a clear and concise written statement that includes the following information: 

 

(1) health care services that are provided covered under the program;

 

(2) any exclusions or limitations on the health care services offered covered, including any cost-sharing arrangements or prior authorization requirements;

 

(3) a list of where the health care services can be obtained and that all health care services must be provided by or through a participating health care provider or community-based health network;

 

(4) a description of the program's complaint resolution process, including how to submit a complaint; how to file a complaint with the commissioner of health; and how to obtain an external review of any adverse decisions as provided under subdivision 10;

 

(5) the conditions under which the program or coverage under the program may be canceled or terminated; and

 

(6) a precise statement specifying that this program is not an insurance product and, as such, is exempt from state regulation of insurance products.

 

(b) The commissioner commissioners of health and human services must approve a copy of the written statement prior to the operation of the program. 

 

Subd. 10.  Complaint resolution process.  (a) The initiative initiatives must establish a complaint resolution process.  The process must make reasonable efforts to resolve complaints and to inform complainants in writing of the initiative's decision within 60 days of receiving the complaint.  Any decision that is adverse to the enrollee shall include a description of the right to an external review as provided in paragraph (c) and how to exercise this right.

 

(b) The initiative initiatives must report any complaint that is not resolved within 60 days to the commissioner of health. 

 

(c) The initiative initiatives must include in the complaint resolution process the ability of an enrollee to pursue the external review process provided under section 62Q.73 with any decision rendered under this external review process binding on the initiative initiatives.

 

Subd. 11.  Data privacy.  The initiative initiatives shall establish data privacy policies and procedures for the program that comply with state and federal data privacy laws. 

 

Subd. 12.  Limitations on enrollment.  (a) The initiative initiatives may limit enrollment in the program.  If enrollment is limited, a waiting list must be established. 

 

(b) The initiative initiatives shall not restrict or deny enrollment in the program except for nonpayment of premiums, fraud or misrepresentation, or as otherwise permitted under this section. 

 

(c) The initiative initiatives may require a certain percentage of participation from eligible employees of a qualifying employer before coverage can be offered through the program. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11223


 

Subd. 13.  Report.  (a) The Each initiative shall submit quarterly status reports to the commissioner of health on January 15, April 15, July 15, and October 15 of each year, with the first report due January 15, 2008.  The Each initiative receiving funding from the Department of Human Services shall submit status reports to the commissioner of human services as defined in the terms of contract with the Department of Human Services.  Each status report shall include:

 

(1) the financial status of the program, including the premium rates, cost per member per month, claims paid out, premiums received, and administrative expenses;

 

(2) a description of the health care benefits offered and the services utilized;

 

(3) the number of employers participating, the number of employees and dependents covered under the program, and the number of health care providers participating;

 

(4) a description of the health outcomes to be achieved by the program and a status report on the performance measurements to be used and collected; and

 

(5) any other information requested by the commissioner commissioners of health, human services, or commerce or the legislature. 

 

(b) The initiative shall contract with an independent entity to conduct an evaluation of the program to be submitted to the commissioners of health and commerce and the legislature by January 15, 2010.  The evaluation shall include:

 

(1) an analysis of the health outcomes established by the initiative and the performance measurements to determine whether the outcomes are being achieved;

 

(2) an analysis of the financial status of the program, including the claims to premiums loss ratio and utilization and cost experience;

 

(3) the demographics of the enrollees, including their age, gender, family income, and the number of dependents;

 

(4) the number of employers and employees who have been denied access to the program and the basis for the denial;

 

(5) specific analysis on enrollees who have aggregate medical claims totaling over $5,000 per year, including data on the enrollee's main diagnosis and whether all the medical claims were covered by the program;

 

(6) number of enrollees referred to state public assistance programs;

 

(7) a comparison of employer-subsidized health coverage provided in a comparable geographic area to the designated community-based geographic area served by the program, including, to the extent available: 

 

(i) the difference in the number of employers with 50 or fewer employees offering employer-subsidized health coverage;

 

(ii) the difference in uncompensated care being provided in each area; and

 

(iii) a comparison of health care outcomes and measurements established by the initiative; and

 

(8) any other information requested by the commissioner of health or commerce.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11224


 

Subd. 14.  Sunset.  This section expires December 31, 2012 August 31, 2014.

 

ARTICLE 3

 

CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE REAUTHORIZATION ACT (CHIPRA)

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.055, subdivision 10, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 10.  Infants.  Medical assistance may be paid for an infant less than one year of age, whose mother was eligible for and receiving medical assistance at the time of birth and who remains in the mother's household or who is in a family with countable income that is equal to or less than the income standard established under section 256B.057, subdivision 1. 

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.057, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1.  Infants and pregnant women.  (a)(1) An infant less than one year of age or a pregnant woman who has written verification of a positive pregnancy test from a physician or licensed registered nurse is eligible for medical assistance if countable family income is equal to or less than 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline for the same family size.  For purposes of this subdivision, "countable family income" means the amount of income considered available using the methodology of the AFDC program under the state's AFDC plan as of July 16, 1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, except for the earned income disregard and employment deductions. 

 

(2) For applications processed within one calendar month prior to the effective date, eligibility shall be determined by applying the income standards and methodologies in effect prior to the effective date for any months in the six-month budget period before that date and the income standards and methodologies in effect on the effective date for any months in the six-month budget period on or after that date.  The income standards for each month shall be added together and compared to the applicant's total countable income for the six-month budget period to determine eligibility. 

 

(b)(1) [Expired, 1Sp2003 c 14 art 12 s 19]

 

(2) For applications processed within one calendar month prior to July 1, 2003, eligibility shall be determined by applying the income standards and methodologies in effect prior to July 1, 2003, for any months in the six-month budget period before July 1, 2003, and the income standards and methodologies in effect on the expiration date for any months in the six-month budget period on or after July 1, 2003.  The income standards for each month shall be added together and compared to the applicant's total countable income for the six-month budget period to determine eligibility. 

 

(3) An amount equal to the amount of earned income exceeding 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline, up to a maximum of the amount by which the combined total of 185 percent of the federal poverty guideline plus the earned income disregards and deductions allowed under the state's AFDC plan as of July 16, 1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, exceeds 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline will be deducted for pregnant women and infants less than one year of age. 

 

(c) Dependent care and child support paid under court order shall be deducted from the countable income of pregnant women. 

 

(d) An infant born on or after January 1, 1991, to a woman who was eligible for and receiving medical assistance on the date of the child's birth shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance without redetermination until the child's first birthday, as long as the child remains in the woman's household. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11225


 

ARTICLE 4

 

LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62S.24, subdivision 8, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 8.  Exchange for long-term care partnership policy; addition of policy rider.  (a) If authorized by federal law or a federal waiver is granted With respect to the long-term care partnership program referenced in section 256B.0571, issuers of long-term care policies may voluntarily exchange a current long-term care insurance policy for a long-term care partnership policy that meets the requirements of Public Law 109-171, section 6021, after the effective date of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in this state.  The exchange may be in the form of:  (1) an amendment or rider; or (2) a disclosure statement indicating that the coverage is now partnership qualified.

 

(b) If authorized by federal law or a federal waiver is granted With respect to the long-term care partnership program referenced in section 256B.0571, allowing to allow an existing long-term care insurance policy to qualify as a partnership policy by addition of:  (1) a policy rider, or amendment; or (2) a disclosure statement, the issuer of the policy is authorized to add the rider, amendment, or disclosure statement to the policy after the effective date of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in this state.

 

(c) The commissioner, in cooperation with the commissioner of human services, shall pursue any federal law changes or waivers necessary to allow the implementation of paragraphs (a) and (b).

 

Sec. 2.  [62S.312] CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP POLICIES. 

 

To qualify as a long-term care partnership policy under this chapter, long-term care insurance policies must meet the requirements for being tax qualified as defined in section 7702B(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and meet certain consumer protection requirements in Section 6021(a)(1)(B)(5)(A) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171, which are taken from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Model Act and Regulation of 2000.  Insurance carriers must certify for each policy form to be included in the long-term care partnership that the form complies with the requirements of the NAIC Model Act and Regulation of 2000 as implemented in sections 62S.05 to 62S.11; 62S.13 to 62S.18; 62S.19; 62S.20, subdivisions 1 to 5; 62S.21; 62S.22; 62S.24; 62S.25; 62S.266; 62S.28; 62S.29; 62S.30; and 62S.31.

 

Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0571, subdivision 6, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 6.  Partnership policy.  "Partnership policy" means a long-term care insurance policy that meets the requirements under subdivision 10 and criteria in sections 62S.23, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), and 62S.312 and was issued on or after the effective date of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in Minnesota.  Policies that are exchanged or that have riders or endorsements added on or after the effective date of the state plan amendment as authorized by the commissioner of commerce qualify as a partnership policy July 1, 2006, or exchanged on or after July 1, 2006, under the provisions of section 62S.24, subdivision 8. 

 

Sec. 4.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.0571, subdivision 8, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 8.  Program established.  (a) The commissioner, in cooperation with the commissioner of commerce, shall establish the Minnesota partnership for long-term care program to provide for the financing of long-term care through a combination of private insurance and medical assistance.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11226


 

(b) An individual becomes eligible to participate in the partnership program by meeting the requirements of either clause (1) or (2):

 

(1) the individual may qualify as a beneficiary of a partnership policy that either (i) is issued on or after the effective date of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership plan in Minnesota, or (ii) qualifies as a partnership policy as authorized by the commissioner of commerce meets the criteria under subdivision 6.  To be eligible under this clause, the individual must be a Minnesota resident at the time coverage first became effective under the partnership policy; or

 

(2) the individual may qualify as a beneficiary of a policy recognized under subdivision 17.

 

Sec. 5.  REPEALER. 

 

Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0571, subdivision 10, is repealed.

 

ARTICLE 5

 

MODIFICATION TO PROHIBITIONS ON ASSET TRANSFERS

 

Section 1.  REPEALER. 

 

Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0595, subdivisions 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, and 5, are repealed.

 

ARTICLE 6

 

COMMUNITY CLINICS

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.032, is amended to read:

 

256B.032 ELIGIBLE VENDORS OF MEDICAL CARE. 

 

(a) Effective January 1, 2011, the commissioner shall establish performance thresholds for health care providers included in the provider peer grouping system developed by the commissioner of health under section 62U.04.  The thresholds shall be set at the 10th percentile of the combined cost and quality measure used for provider peer grouping, and separate thresholds shall be set for hospital and physician services.

 

(b) Beginning January 1, 2012, any health care provider with a combined cost and quality score below the threshold set in paragraph (a) shall be prohibited from enrolling as a vendor of medical care in the medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare programs, and shall not be eligible for direct payments under those programs or for payments made by managed care plans under their contracts with the commissioner under section 256B.69 or 256L.12.  A health care provider that is prohibited from enrolling as a vendor or receiving payments under this paragraph may reenroll effective January 1 of any subsequent year if the provider's most recent combined cost and quality score exceeds the threshold established in paragraph (a).

 

(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), a provider may continue to participate as a vendor or as part of a managed care plan provider network if the commissioner determines that a contract with the provider is necessary to ensure adequate access to health care services.

 

(d) By January 15, 2013, the commissioner shall report to the legislature on the impact of this section.  The commissioner's report shall include information on:


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11227


 

(1) the providers falling below the thresholds as of January 1, 2012;

 

(2) the volume of services and cost of care provided to enrollees in the medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare programs in the 12 months prior to January 1, 2012, by providers falling below the thresholds;

 

(3) providers who fell below the thresholds but continued to be eligible vendors under paragraph paragraphs (c) and (e);

 

(4) the estimated cost savings achieved by not contracting with providers who do not meet the performance thresholds; and

 

(5) recommendations for increasing the threshold levels of performance over time.

 

(e) Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics are exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b).

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 30, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 30.  Other clinic services.  (a) Medical assistance covers rural health clinic services, federally qualified health center services, nonprofit community health clinic services, public health clinic services, and the services of a clinic meeting the criteria established in rule by the commissioner.  Rural health clinic services and federally qualified health center services mean services defined in United States Code, title 42, section 1396d(a)(2)(B) and (C).  Payment for rural health clinic and federally qualified health center services shall be made according to applicable federal law and regulation.

 

(b) A federally qualified health center that is beginning initial operation shall submit an estimate of budgeted costs and visits for the initial reporting period in the form and detail required by the commissioner.  A federally qualified health center that is already in operation shall submit an initial report using actual costs and visits for the initial reporting period.  Within 90 days of the end of its reporting period, a federally qualified health center shall submit, in the form and detail required by the commissioner, a report of its operations, including allowable costs actually incurred for the period and the actual number of visits for services furnished during the period, and other information required by the commissioner.  Federally qualified health centers that file Medicare cost reports shall provide the commissioner with a copy of the most recent Medicare cost report filed with the Medicare program intermediary for the reporting year which support the costs claimed on their cost report to the state.

 

(c) In order to continue cost-based payment under the medical assistance program according to paragraphs (a) and (b), a federally qualified health center or rural health clinic must apply for designation as an essential community provider within six months of final adoption of rules by the Department of Health according to section 62Q.19, subdivision 7.  For those federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics that have applied for essential community provider status within the six-month time prescribed, medical assistance payments will continue to be made according to paragraphs (a) and (b) for the first three years after application.  For federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics that either do not apply within the time specified above or who have had essential community provider status for three years, medical assistance payments for health services provided by these entities shall be according to the same rates and conditions applicable to the same service provided by health care providers that are not federally qualified health centers or rural health clinics. 

 

(d) Effective July 1, 1999, the provisions of paragraph (c) requiring a federally qualified health center or a rural health clinic to make application for an essential community provider designation in order to have cost-based payments made according to paragraphs (a) and (b) no longer apply.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11228


 

(e) Effective January 1, 2000, payments made according to paragraphs (a) and (b) shall be limited to the cost phase-out schedule of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

 

(f) Effective January 1, 2001, each federally qualified health center and rural health clinic may elect to be paid either under the prospective payment system established in United States Code, title 42, section 1396a(aa), or under an alternative payment methodology consistent with the requirements of United States Code, title 42, section 1396a(aa), and approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  The alternative payment methodology shall be 100 percent of cost as determined according to Medicare cost principles.

 

(g) For purposes of this section, "nonprofit community clinic" is a clinic that:

 

(1) has nonprofit status as specified in chapter 317A;

 

(2) has tax exempt status as provided in Internal Revenue Code, section 501(c)(3);

 

(3) is established to provide health services to low-income population groups, uninsured, high-risk and special needs populations, underserved and other special needs populations;

 

(4) employs professional staff at least one-half of which are familiar with the cultural background of their clients;

 

(5) charges for services on a sliding fee scale designed to provide assistance to low-income clients based on current poverty income guidelines and family size; and

 

(6) does not restrict access or services because of a client's financial limitations or public assistance status and provides no-cost care as needed.

 

ARTICLE 7

 

DENTAL BENEFIT SET

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.0625, subdivision 9, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 9.  Dental services.  (a) Medical assistance covers dental services.

 

(b) Medical assistance dental coverage for nonpregnant adults is limited to the following services:

 

(1) comprehensive exams, limited to once every five years;

 

(2) periodic exams, limited to one per year;

 

(3) limited exams;

 

(4) bitewing x-rays, limited to one per year;

 

(5) periapical x-rays;

 

(6) panoramic x-rays, limited to one every five years, and only if provided in conjunction with a posterior extraction or scheduled outpatient facility procedure, or as except (1) when medically necessary for the diagnosis and follow-up of oral and maxillofacial pathology and trauma.  Panoramic x-rays may be taken or (2) once every two years for patients who cannot cooperate for intraoral film due to a developmental disability or medical condition that does not allow for intraoral film placement;


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11229


 

(7) prophylaxis, limited to one per year;

 

(8) application of fluoride varnish, limited to one per year;

 

(9) posterior fillings, all at the amalgam rate;

 

(10) anterior fillings;

 

(11) endodontics, limited to root canals on the anterior and premolars only;

 

(12) removable prostheses, each dental arch limited to one every six years;

 

(13) oral surgery, limited to extractions, biopsies, and incision and drainage of abscesses;

 

(14) palliative treatment and sedative fillings for relief of pain; and

 

(15) full-mouth debridement, limited to one every five years.

 

(c) In addition to the services specified in paragraph (b), medical assistance covers the following services for adults, if provided in an outpatient hospital setting or freestanding ambulatory surgical center as part of outpatient dental surgery:

 

(1) periodontics, limited to periodontal scaling and root planing once every two years;

 

(2) general anesthesia; and

 

(3) full-mouth survey once every five years.

 

(d) Medical assistance covers medically necessary dental services for children that are medically necessary and pregnant women.  The following guidelines apply:

 

(1) posterior fillings are paid at the amalgam rate;

 

(2) application of sealants are covered once every five years per permanent molar for children only; and

 

(3) application of fluoride varnish is covered once every six months.; and

 

(4) orthodontia is eligible for coverage for children only.

 

ARTICLE 8

 

PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR HEALTH SERVICES

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 25, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 25.  Prior authorization required.  The commissioner shall publish in the State Register Minnesota health care programs provider manual and on the department's Web site a list of health services that require prior authorization, as well as the criteria and standards used to select health services on the list.  The list and the criteria and standards used to formulate it are not subject to the requirements of sections 14.001 to 14.69.  The commissioner's decision whether prior authorization is required for a health service is not subject to administrative appeal. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11230


 

ARTICLE 9

 

DRUG FORMULARY COMMITTEE

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 13c, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 13c.  Formulary committee.  The commissioner, after receiving recommendations from professional medical associations and professional pharmacy associations, and consumer groups shall designate a Formulary Committee to carry out duties as described in subdivisions 13 to 13g.  The Formulary Committee shall be comprised of four licensed physicians actively engaged in the practice of medicine in Minnesota one of whom must be actively engaged in the treatment of persons with mental illness; at least three licensed pharmacists actively engaged in the practice of pharmacy in Minnesota; and one consumer representative; the remainder to be made up of health care professionals who are licensed in their field and have recognized knowledge in the clinically appropriate prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring of covered outpatient drugs.  Members of the Formulary Committee shall not be employed by the Department of Human Services, but the committee shall be staffed by an employee of the department who shall serve as an ex officio, nonvoting member of the committee.  The department's medical director shall also serve as an ex officio, nonvoting member for the committee.  Committee members shall serve three-year terms and may be reappointed by the commissioner.  The Formulary Committee shall meet at least quarterly twice per year.  The commissioner may require more frequent Formulary Committee meetings as needed.  An honorarium of $100 per meeting and reimbursement for mileage shall be paid to each committee member in attendance.

 

ARTICLE 10

 

PREFERRED DRUG LIST

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 13g, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 13g.  Preferred drug list.  (a) The commissioner shall adopt and implement a preferred drug list by January 1, 2004.  The commissioner may enter into a contract with a vendor for the purpose of participating in a preferred drug list and supplemental rebate program.  The commissioner shall ensure that any contract meets all federal requirements and maximizes federal financial participation.  The commissioner shall publish the preferred drug list annually in the State Register and shall maintain an accurate and up-to-date list on the agency Web site. 

 

(b) The commissioner may add to, delete from, and otherwise modify the preferred drug list, after consulting with the Formulary Committee and appropriate medical specialists and providing public notice and the opportunity for public comment. 

 

(c) The commissioner shall adopt and administer the preferred drug list as part of the administration of the supplemental drug rebate program.  Reimbursement for prescription drugs not on the preferred drug list may be subject to prior authorization, unless the drug manufacturer signs a supplemental rebate contract. 

 

(d) For purposes of this subdivision, "preferred drug list" means a list of prescription drugs within designated therapeutic classes selected by the commissioner, for which prior authorization based on the identity of the drug or class is not required. 

 

(e) The commissioner shall seek any federal waivers or approvals necessary to implement this subdivision. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11231


 

ARTICLE 11

 

MULTISOURCE DRUGS

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.0625, subdivision 13e, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 13e.  Payment rates.  (a) The basis for determining the amount of payment shall be the lower of the actual acquisition costs of the drugs plus a fixed dispensing fee; the maximum allowable cost set by the federal government or by the commissioner plus the fixed dispensing fee; or the usual and customary price charged to the public.  The amount of payment basis must be reduced to reflect all discount amounts applied to the charge by any provider/insurer agreement or contract for submitted charges to medical assistance programs.  The net submitted charge may not be greater than the patient liability for the service.  The pharmacy dispensing fee shall be $3.65, except that the dispensing fee for intravenous solutions which must be compounded by the pharmacist shall be $8 per bag, $14 per bag for cancer chemotherapy products, and $30 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in one liter quantities, or $44 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in quantities greater than one liter.  Actual acquisition cost includes quantity and other special discounts except time and cash discounts.  Effective July 1, 2009, the actual acquisition cost of a drug shall be estimated by the commissioner, at average wholesale price minus 15 percent.  The actual acquisition cost of antihemophilic factor drugs shall be estimated at the average wholesale price minus 30 percent.  The maximum allowable cost of a multisource drug may be set by the commissioner and it shall be comparable to, but no higher than, the maximum amount paid by other third-party payors in this state who have maximum allowable cost programs.  Establishment of the amount of payment for drugs shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.

 

(b) An additional dispensing fee of $.30 may be added to the dispensing fee paid to pharmacists for legend drug prescriptions dispensed to residents of long-term care facilities when a unit dose blister card system, approved by the department, is used.  Under this type of dispensing system, the pharmacist must dispense a 30-day supply of drug.  The National Drug Code (NDC) from the drug container used to fill the blister card must be identified on the claim to the department.  The unit dose blister card containing the drug must meet the packaging standards set forth in Minnesota Rules, part 6800.2700, that govern the return of unused drugs to the pharmacy for reuse.  The pharmacy provider will be required to credit the department for the actual acquisition cost of all unused drugs that are eligible for reuse.  Over-the-counter medications must be dispensed in the manufacturer's unopened package.  The commissioner may permit the drug clozapine to be dispensed in a quantity that is less than a 30-day supply.

 

(c) Whenever a generically equivalent product is available maximum allowable cost has been set for a multisource drug, payment shall be on the basis of the actual acquisition cost of the generic drug, or on the maximum allowable cost established by the commissioner unless prior authorization for the brand name product has been granted according to the criteria established by the Drug Formulary Committee as required by subdivision 13f, paragraph (a), and the prescriber has indicated "dispense as written" on the prescription in a manner consistent with section 151.21, subdivision 2.

 

(d) The basis for determining the amount of payment for drugs administered in an outpatient setting shall be the lower of the usual and customary cost submitted by the provider or the amount established for Medicare by the United States Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to title XVIII, section 1847a of the federal Social Security Act.

 

(e) The commissioner may negotiate lower reimbursement rates for specialty pharmacy products than the rates specified in paragraph (a).  The commissioner may require individuals enrolled in the health care programs administered by the department to obtain specialty pharmacy products from providers with whom the commissioner has negotiated lower reimbursement rates.  Specialty pharmacy products are defined as those used by a small number of recipients or recipients with complex and chronic diseases that require expensive and challenging drug regimens.  Examples of these conditions include, but are not limited to:  multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS,


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11232


 

transplantation, hepatitis C, growth hormone deficiency, Crohn's Disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and certain forms of cancer.  Specialty pharmaceutical products include injectable and infusion therapies, biotechnology drugs, high-cost therapies, and therapies that require complex care.  The commissioner shall consult with the formulary committee to develop a list of specialty pharmacy products subject to this paragraph.  In consulting with the formulary committee in developing this list, the commissioner shall take into consideration the population served by specialty pharmacy products, the current delivery system and standard of care in the state, and access to care issues.  The commissioner shall have the discretion to adjust the reimbursement rate to prevent access to care issues.

 

ARTICLE 12

 

ADMINISTRATIVE UNIFORMITY COMMITTEE

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 8d.  Home infusion therapy services.  Home infusion therapy services provided by home infusion therapy pharmacies must be paid the lower of the submitted charge or the combined payment rates for component services typically provided.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective upon federal approval.

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.0625, subdivision 13e, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 13e.  Payment rates.  (a) The basis for determining the amount of payment shall be the lower of the actual acquisition costs of the drugs plus a fixed dispensing fee; the maximum allowable cost set by the federal government or by the commissioner plus the fixed dispensing fee; or the usual and customary price charged to the public.  The amount of payment basis must be reduced to reflect all discount amounts applied to the charge by any provider/insurer agreement or contract for submitted charges to medical assistance programs.  The net submitted charge may not be greater than the patient liability for the service.  The pharmacy dispensing fee shall be $3.65, except that the dispensing fee for intravenous solutions which must be compounded by the pharmacist shall be $8 per bag, $14 per bag for cancer chemotherapy products, and $30 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in one liter quantities, or $44 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in quantities greater than one liter.  Actual acquisition cost includes quantity and other special discounts except time and cash discounts.  Effective July 1, 2009, the actual acquisition cost of a drug shall be estimated by the commissioner, at average wholesale price minus 15 percent.  The actual acquisition cost of antihemophilic factor drugs shall be estimated at the average wholesale price minus 30 percent.  The maximum allowable cost of a multisource drug may be set by the commissioner and it shall be comparable to, but no higher than, the maximum amount paid by other third-party payors in this state who have maximum allowable cost programs.  Establishment of the amount of payment for drugs shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.

 

(b) An additional dispensing fee of $.30 may be added to the dispensing fee paid to pharmacists for legend drug prescriptions dispensed to residents of long-term care facilities when a unit dose blister card system, approved by the department, is used.  Under this type of dispensing system, the pharmacist must dispense a 30-day supply of drug.  The National Drug Code (NDC) from the drug container used to fill the blister card must be identified on the claim to the department.  The unit dose blister card containing the drug must meet the packaging standards set forth in Minnesota Rules, part 6800.2700, that govern the return of unused drugs to the pharmacy for reuse.  The pharmacy provider will be required to credit the department for the actual acquisition cost of all unused drugs that are eligible for reuse.  Over-the-counter medications must be dispensed in the manufacturer's unopened package.  The commissioner may permit the drug clozapine to be dispensed in a quantity that is less than a 30-day supply.

 

(c) Whenever a generically equivalent product is available, payment shall be on the basis of the actual acquisition cost of the generic drug, or on the maximum allowable cost established by the commissioner.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11233


 

(d) The basis for determining the amount of payment for drugs administered in an outpatient setting shall be the lower of the usual and customary cost submitted by the provider or the amount established for Medicare by the United States Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to title XVIII, section 1847a of the federal Social Security Act.

 

(e) The commissioner may negotiate lower reimbursement rates for specialty pharmacy products than the rates specified in paragraph (a).  The commissioner may require individuals enrolled in the health care programs administered by the department to obtain specialty pharmacy products from providers with whom the commissioner has negotiated lower reimbursement rates.  Specialty pharmacy products are defined as those used by a small number of recipients or recipients with complex and chronic diseases that require expensive and challenging drug regimens.  Examples of these conditions include, but are not limited to:  multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, transplantation, hepatitis C, growth hormone deficiency, Crohn's Disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and certain forms of cancer.  Specialty pharmaceutical products include injectable and infusion therapies, biotechnology drugs, high-cost therapies, and therapies that require complex care.  The commissioner shall consult with the formulary committee to develop a list of specialty pharmacy products subject to this paragraph.  In consulting with the formulary committee in developing this list, the commissioner shall take into consideration the population served by specialty pharmacy products, the current delivery system and standard of care in the state, and access to care issues.  The commissioner shall have the discretion to adjust the reimbursement rate to prevent access to care issues.

 

(f) Home infusion therapy services provided by home infusion therapy pharmacies must be paid at rates according to subdivision 8d.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective upon federal approval.

 

ARTICLE 13

 

HEALTH PLANS

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62A.045, is amended to read:

 

62A.045 PAYMENTS ON BEHALF OF ENROLLEES IN GOVERNMENT HEALTH PROGRAMS. 

 

(a) As a condition of doing business in Minnesota or providing coverage to residents of Minnesota covered by this section, each health insurer shall comply with the requirements of the federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171, including any federal regulations adopted under that act, to the extent that it imposes a requirement that applies in this state and that is not also required by the laws of this state.  This section does not require compliance with any provision of the federal act prior to the effective date provided for that provision in the federal act.  The commissioner shall enforce this section.

 

For the purpose of this section, "health insurer" includes self-insured plans, group health plans (as defined in section 607(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), service benefit plans, managed care organizations, pharmacy benefit managers, or other parties that are by contract legally responsible to pay a claim for a healthcare item or service for an individual receiving benefits under paragraph (b).

 

(b) No health plan offered by a health insurer issued or renewed to provide coverage to a Minnesota resident shall contain any provision denying or reducing benefits because services are rendered to a person who is eligible for or receiving medical benefits pursuant to title XIX of the Social Security Act (Medicaid) in this or any other state; chapter 256; 256B; or 256D or services pursuant to section 252.27; 256L.01 to 256L.10; 260B.331, subdivision 2; 260C.331, subdivision 2; or 393.07, subdivision 1 or 2.  No health carrier insurer providing benefits under plans covered by this section shall use eligibility for medical programs named in this section as an underwriting guideline or reason for nonacceptance of the risk. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11234


 

(c) If payment for covered expenses has been made under state medical programs for health care items or services provided to an individual, and a third party has a legal liability to make payments, the rights of payment and appeal of an adverse coverage decision for the individual, or in the case of a child their responsible relative or caretaker, will be subrogated to the state agency.  The state agency may assert its rights under this section within three years of the date the service was rendered.  For purposes of this section, "state agency" includes prepaid health plans under contract with the commissioner according to sections 256B.69, 256D.03, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), and 256L.12; children's mental health collaboratives under section 245.493; demonstration projects for persons with disabilities under section 256B.77; nursing homes under the alternative payment demonstration project under section 256B.434; and county-based purchasing entities under section 256B.692. 

 

(d) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, when a person covered by a health plan offered by a health insurer receives medical benefits according to any statute listed in this section, payment for covered services or notice of denial for services billed by the provider must be issued directly to the provider.  If a person was receiving medical benefits through the Department of Human Services at the time a service was provided, the provider must indicate this benefit coverage on any claim forms submitted by the provider to the health carrier insurer for those services.  If the commissioner of human services notifies the health carrier insurer that the commissioner has made payments to the provider, payment for benefits or notices of denials issued by the health carrier insurer must be issued directly to the commissioner.  Submission by the department to the health carrier insurer of the claim on a Department of Human Services claim form is proper notice and shall be considered proof of payment of the claim to the provider and supersedes any contract requirements of the health carrier insurer relating to the form of submission.  Liability to the insured for coverage is satisfied to the extent that payments for those benefits are made by the health carrier insurer to the provider or the commissioner as required by this section.

 

(e) When a state agency has acquired the rights of an individual eligible for medical programs named in this section and has health benefits coverage through a health carrier insurer, the health carrier insurer shall not impose requirements that are different from requirements applicable to an agent or assignee of any other individual covered.

 

(f) For the purpose of this section, health plan includes coverage offered by community integrated service networks, any plan governed under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, sections 1001 to 1461, and coverage offered under the exclusions listed in section 62A.011, subdivision 3, clauses (2), (6), (9), (10), and (12). 

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.69, subdivision 23, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 23.  Alternative services; elderly and disabled persons.  (a) The commissioner may implement demonstration projects to create alternative integrated delivery systems for acute and long-term care services to elderly persons and persons with disabilities as defined in section 256B.77, subdivision 7a, that provide increased coordination, improve access to quality services, and mitigate future cost increases.  The commissioner may seek federal authority to combine Medicare and Medicaid capitation payments for the purpose of such demonstrations and may contract with Medicare-approved special needs plans that are offered by a demonstration provider or by an entity that is directly or indirectly wholly owned or controlled by a demonstration provider to provide Medicaid services.  Medicare funds and services shall be administered according to the terms and conditions of the federal contract and demonstration provisions.  For the purpose of administering medical assistance funds, demonstrations under this subdivision are subject to subdivisions 1 to 22.  The provisions of Minnesota Rules, parts 9500.1450 to 9500.1464, apply to these demonstrations, with the exceptions of parts 9500.1452, subpart 2, item B; and 9500.1457, subpart 1, items B and C, which do not apply to persons enrolling in demonstrations under this section.  All enforcement and rulemaking powers available under chapters 62D, 62M, and 62Q are hereby granted to the commissioner of health with respect to Medicare-approved special needs plans with which the commissioner contracts to provide Medicaid services under this section.  An initial open enrollment period may be provided.  Persons who disenroll from demonstrations under this subdivision remain subject to Minnesota Rules, parts 9500.1450 to 9500.1464.  When a person is enrolled in a health plan under these demonstrations and the health


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11235


 

plan's participation is subsequently terminated for any reason, the person shall be provided an opportunity to select a new health plan and shall have the right to change health plans within the first 60 days of enrollment in the second health plan.  Persons required to participate in health plans under this section who fail to make a choice of health plan shall not be randomly assigned to health plans under these demonstrations.  Notwithstanding section 256L.12, subdivision 5, and Minnesota Rules, part 9505.5220, subpart 1, item A, if adopted, for the purpose of demonstrations under this subdivision, the commissioner may contract with managed care organizations, including counties, to serve only elderly persons eligible for medical assistance, elderly and disabled persons, or disabled persons only.  For persons with a primary diagnosis of developmental disability, serious and persistent mental illness, or serious emotional disturbance, the commissioner must ensure that the county authority has approved the demonstration and contracting design.  Enrollment in these projects for persons with disabilities shall be voluntary.  The commissioner shall not implement any demonstration project under this subdivision for persons with a primary diagnosis of developmental disabilities, serious and persistent mental illness, or serious emotional disturbance, without approval of the county board of the county in which the demonstration is being implemented.

 

(b) Notwithstanding chapter 245B, sections 252.40 to 252.46, 256B.092, 256B.501 to 256B.5015, and Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0036, 9525.1200 to 9525.1330, 9525.1580, and 9525.1800 to 9525.1930, the commissioner may implement under this section projects for persons with developmental disabilities.  The commissioner may capitate payments for ICF/MR services, waivered services for developmental disabilities, including case management services, day training and habilitation and alternative active treatment services, and other services as approved by the state and by the federal government.  Case management and active treatment must be individualized and developed in accordance with a person-centered plan.  Costs under these projects may not exceed costs that would have been incurred under fee-for-service.  Beginning July 1, 2003, and until four years after the pilot project implementation date, subcontractor participation in the long-term care developmental disability pilot is limited to a nonprofit long-term care system providing ICF/MR services, home and community-based waiver services, and in-home services to no more than 120 consumers with developmental disabilities in Carver, Hennepin, and Scott Counties.  The commissioner shall report to the legislature prior to expansion of the developmental disability pilot project.  This paragraph expires four years after the implementation date of the pilot project.

 

(c) Before implementation of a demonstration project for disabled persons, the commissioner must provide information to appropriate committees of the house of representatives and senate and must involve representatives of affected disability groups in the design of the demonstration projects.

 

(d) A nursing facility reimbursed under the alternative reimbursement methodology in section 256B.434 may, in collaboration with a hospital, clinic, or other health care entity provide services under paragraph (a).  The commissioner shall amend the state plan and seek any federal waivers necessary to implement this paragraph.

 

(e) The commissioner, in consultation with the commissioners of commerce and health, may approve and implement programs for all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE) according to federal laws and regulations governing that program and state laws or rules applicable to participating providers.  The process for approval of these programs shall begin only after the commissioner receives grant money in an amount sufficient to cover the state share of the administrative and actuarial costs to implement the programs during state fiscal years 2006 and 2007.  Grant amounts for this purpose shall be deposited in an account in the special revenue fund and are appropriated to the commissioner to be used solely for the purpose of PACE administrative and actuarial costs.  A PACE provider is not required to be licensed or certified as a health plan company as defined in section 62Q.01, subdivision 4.  Persons age 55 and older who have been screened by the county and found to be eligible for services under the elderly waiver or community alternatives for disabled individuals or who are already eligible for Medicaid but meet level of care criteria for receipt of waiver services may choose to enroll in the PACE program.  Medicare and Medicaid services will be provided according to this subdivision and federal Medicare and Medicaid requirements governing PACE providers and programs.  PACE enrollees will receive Medicaid home and community-based services through the PACE provider as an alternative to services for which they would otherwise be eligible through home and community-based waiver programs and Medicaid State Plan Services.  The commissioner shall establish Medicaid rates for PACE providers that do not exceed costs that would have been incurred under fee-for-service or other relevant managed care programs operated by the state.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11236


 

(f) The commissioner shall seek federal approval to expand the Minnesota disability health options (MnDHO) program established under this subdivision in stages, first to regional population centers outside the seven-county metro area and then to all areas of the state.  Until July 1, 2009, expansion for MnDHO projects that include home and community-based services is limited to the two projects and service areas in effect on March 1, 2006.  Enrollment in integrated MnDHO programs that include home and community-based services shall remain voluntary.  Costs for home and community-based services included under MnDHO must not exceed costs that would have been incurred under the fee-for-service program.  Notwithstanding whether expansion occurs under this paragraph, in determining MnDHO payment rates and risk adjustment methods for contract years starting in 2012, the commissioner must consider the methods used to determine county allocations for home and community-based program participants.  If necessary to reduce MnDHO rates to comply with the provision regarding MnDHO costs for home and community-based services, the commissioner shall achieve the reduction by maintaining the base rate for contract years 2010 and 2011 for services provided under the community alternatives for disabled individuals waiver at the same level as for contract year 2009.  The commissioner may apply other reductions to MnDHO rates to implement decreases in provider payment rates required by state law.  In developing program specifications for expansion of integrated programs, the commissioner shall involve and consult the state-level stakeholder group established in subdivision 28, paragraph (d), including consultation on whether and how to include home and community-based waiver programs.  Plans for further expansion of MnDHO projects shall be presented to the chairs of the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance by February 1, 2007.

 

(g) Notwithstanding section 256B.0261, health plans providing services under this section are responsible for home care targeted case management and relocation targeted case management.  Services must be provided according to the terms of the waivers and contracts approved by the federal government.

 

ARTICLE 14

 

CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 15C.13, is amended to read:

 

15C.13 DISTRIBUTION TO PRIVATE PLAINTIFF IN CERTAIN ACTIONS. 

 

If the prosecuting attorney intervenes at the outset in an action brought by a person under section 15C.05, the person is entitled to receive not less than 15 percent or more than 25 percent of any recovery in proportion to the person's contribution to the conduct of the action.  If the prosecuting attorney does not intervene in the action at any time, the person is entitled to receive not less than 25 percent or more than 30 percent of any recovery of the civil penalty and damages, or settlement, as the court determines is reasonable.  If the prosecuting attorney does not intervene in the action at the outset but subsequently intervenes, the person is entitled to receive not less than 15 percent or more than 30 percent of any recovery, as the court determines is reasonable based on the person's participation in the action before the prosecuting attorney intervened.  For recoveries whose distribution is governed by federal code or rule, the basis for calculating the portion of the recovery the person is entitled to receive shall not include amounts reserved for distribution to the federal government or designated in their use by federal code or rule.

 

ARTICLE 15

 

PREPAID HEALTH PLANS

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.69, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5a.  Managed care contracts.  (a) Managed care contracts under this section and sections 256L.12 and 256D.03, shall be entered into or renewed on a calendar year basis beginning January 1, 1996.  Managed care contracts which were in effect on June 30, 1995, and set to renew on July 1, 1995, shall be renewed for the period July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995 at the same terms that were in effect on June 30, 1995.  The commissioner may issue separate contracts with requirements specific to services to medical assistance recipients age 65 and older.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11237


 

(b) A prepaid health plan providing covered health services for eligible persons pursuant to chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L, is responsible for complying with the terms of its contract with the commissioner.  Requirements applicable to managed care programs under chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L, established after the effective date of a contract with the commissioner take effect when the contract is next issued or renewed.

 

(c) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2003, the commissioner shall withhold five percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan's payment rate under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance and general assistance medical care programs pending completion of performance targets.  Each performance target must be quantifiable, objective, measurable, and reasonably attainable, except in the case of a performance target based on a federal or state law or rule.  Criteria for assessment of each performance target must be outlined in writing prior to the contract effective date.  The managed care plan must demonstrate, to the commissioner's satisfaction, that the data submitted regarding attainment of the performance target is accurate.  The commissioner shall periodically change the administrative measures used as performance targets in order to improve plan performance across a broader range of administrative services.  The performance targets must include measurement of plan efforts to contain spending on health care services and administrative activities.  The commissioner may adopt plan-specific performance targets that take into account factors affecting only one plan, including characteristics of the plan's enrollee population.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July of the following year if performance targets in the contract are achieved.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.

 

(d) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, the commissioner shall withhold three percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance and general assistance medical care programs.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.

 

The return of the withhold under this paragraph is not subject to the requirements of paragraph (c).

 

(e) Effective for services provided on or after January 1, 2010, the commissioner shall require that managed care plans use the assessment and authorization processes, forms, timelines, standards, documentation, and data reporting requirements, protocols, billing processes, and policies consistent with medical assistance fee-for-service or the Department of Human Services contract requirements consistent with medical assistance fee-for-service or the Department of Human Services contract requirements for all personal care assistance services under section 256B.0659.

 

(f) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010, the commissioner shall withhold 3.5 percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance program.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.

 

(g) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011, the commissioner shall withhold four percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance program.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.

 

(h) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, the commissioner shall withhold 4.5 percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance program.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11238


 

(i) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, the commissioner shall withhold 4.5 percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance program.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.

 

(j) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2014, the commissioner shall withhold three percent of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance and prepaid general assistance medical care programs.  The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year.  The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.

 

(k) A managed care plan or a county-based purchasing plan under section 256B.692 may include as admitted assets under section 62D.044 any amount withheld under this section that is reasonably expected to be returned.

 

(l) Contracts between the commissioner and a prepaid health plan are exempt from the set-aside and preference provisions of section 16C.16, subdivisions 6, paragraph (a), and 7.

 

(m) The return of the withhold under paragraph (d) and paragraphs (f) to (j) is not subject to the requirements of paragraph (c).

 

ARTICLE 16

 

INCOME STANDARDS FOR ELIGIBILITY

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.056, subdivision 1c, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 1c.  Families with children income methodology.  (a)(1) [Expired, 1Sp2003 c 14 art 12 s 17]

 

(2) For applications processed within one calendar month prior to July 1, 2003, eligibility shall be determined by applying the income standards and methodologies in effect prior to July 1, 2003, for any months in the six-month budget period before July 1, 2003, and the income standards and methodologies in effect on July 1, 2003, for any months in the six-month budget period on or after that date.  The income standards for each month shall be added together and compared to the applicant's total countable income for the six-month budget period to determine eligibility.

 

(3) For children ages one through 18 whose eligibility is determined under section 256B.057, subdivision 2, the following deductions shall be applied to income counted toward the child's eligibility as allowed under the state's AFDC plan in effect as of July 16, 1996:  $90 work expense, dependent care, and child support paid under court order.  This clause is effective October 1, 2003.

 

(b) For families with children whose eligibility is determined using the standard specified in section 256B.056, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), 17 percent of countable earned income shall be disregarded for up to four months and the following deductions shall be applied to each individual's income counted toward eligibility as allowed under the state's AFDC plan in effect as of July 16, 1996:  dependent care and child support paid under court order.

 

(c) If the four-month disregard in paragraph (b) has been applied to the wage earner's income for four months, the disregard shall not be applied again until the wage earner's income has not been considered in determining medical assistance eligibility for 12 consecutive months.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11239


 

(d) The commissioner shall adjust the income standards under this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal poverty guidelines following publication by the United States Department of Health and Human Services except that the income standards shall not go below those in effect on July 1, 2009.

 

(e) For children age 18 or under, annual gifts of $2,000 or less by a tax-exempt organization to or for the benefit of the child with a life-threatening illness must be disregarded from income.

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  General assistance medical care; eligibility.  (a) General assistance medical care may be paid for any person who is not eligible for medical assistance under chapter 256B, including eligibility for medical assistance based on a spenddown of excess income according to section 256B.056, subdivision 5, or MinnesotaCare for applicants and recipients defined in paragraph (c), except as provided in paragraph (d), and:

 

(1) who is receiving assistance under section 256D.05, except for families with children who are eligible under Minnesota family investment program (MFIP), or who is having a payment made on the person's behalf under sections 256I.01 to 256I.06; or

 

(2) who is a resident of Minnesota; and

 

(i) who has gross countable income not in excess of 75 percent of the federal poverty guidelines for the family size, using a six-month budget period and whose equity in assets is not in excess of $1,000 per assistance unit.  General assistance medical care is not available for applicants or enrollees who are otherwise eligible for medical assistance but fail to verify their assets.  Enrollees who become eligible for medical assistance shall be terminated and transferred to medical assistance.  Exempt assets, the reduction of excess assets, and the waiver of excess assets must conform to the medical assistance program in section 256B.056, subdivisions 3 and 3d, with the following exception:  the maximum amount of undistributed funds in a trust that could be distributed to or on behalf of the beneficiary by the trustee, assuming the full exercise of the trustee's discretion under the terms of the trust, must be applied toward the asset maximum; or

 

(ii) who has gross countable income above 75 percent of the federal poverty guidelines but not in excess of 175 percent of the federal poverty guidelines for the family size, using a six-month budget period, whose equity in assets is not in excess of the limits in section 256B.056, subdivision 3c, and who applies during an inpatient hospitalization.

 

(b) The commissioner shall adjust the income standards under this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal poverty guidelines following publication by the United States Department of Health and Human Services except that the income standards shall not go below those in effect on July 1, 2009.

 

(c) Effective for applications and renewals processed on or after September 1, 2006, general assistance medical care may not be paid for applicants or recipients who are adults with dependent children under 21 whose gross family income is equal to or less than 275 percent of the federal poverty guidelines who are not described in paragraph (f).

 

(d) Effective for applications and renewals processed on or after September 1, 2006, general assistance medical care may be paid for applicants and recipients who meet all eligibility requirements of paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), for a temporary period beginning the date of application.  Immediately following approval of general assistance medical care, enrollees shall be enrolled in MinnesotaCare under section 256L.04, subdivision 7, with covered services as provided in section 256L.03 for the rest of the six-month general assistance medical care eligibility period, until their six-month renewal.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11240


 

(e) To be eligible for general assistance medical care following enrollment in MinnesotaCare as required by paragraph (d), an individual must complete a new application.

 

(f) Applicants and recipients eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), are exempt from the MinnesotaCare enrollment requirements in this subdivision if they:

 

(1) have applied for and are awaiting a determination of blindness or disability by the state medical review team or a determination of eligibility for Supplemental Security Income or Social Security Disability Insurance by the Social Security Administration;

 

(2) fail to meet the requirements of section 256L.09, subdivision 2;

 

(3) are homeless as defined by United States Code, title 42, section 11301, et seq.;

 

(4) are classified as end-stage renal disease beneficiaries in the Medicare program;

 

(5) are enrolled in private health care coverage as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 9;

 

(6) are eligible under paragraph (k);

 

(7) receive treatment funded pursuant to section 254B.02; or

 

(8) reside in the Minnesota sex offender program defined in chapter 246B.

 

(g) For applications received on or after October 1, 2003, eligibility may begin no earlier than the date of application.  For individuals eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), a redetermination of eligibility must occur every 12 months.  Individuals are eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (ii), only during inpatient hospitalization but may reapply if there is a subsequent period of inpatient hospitalization.

 

(h) Beginning September 1, 2006, Minnesota health care program applications and renewals completed by recipients and applicants who are persons described in paragraph (d) and submitted to the county agency shall be determined for MinnesotaCare eligibility by the county agency.  If all other eligibility requirements of this subdivision are met, eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be available in any month during which MinnesotaCare enrollment is pending.  Upon notification of eligibility for MinnesotaCare, notice of termination for eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be sent to an applicant or recipient.  If all other eligibility requirements of this subdivision are met, eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be available until enrollment in MinnesotaCare subject to the provisions of paragraphs (d), (f), and (g).

 

(i) The date of an initial Minnesota health care program application necessary to begin a determination of eligibility shall be the date the applicant has provided a name, address, and Social Security number, signed and dated, to the county agency or the Department of Human Services.  If the applicant is unable to provide a name, address, Social Security number, and signature when health care is delivered due to a medical condition or disability, a health care provider may act on an applicant's behalf to establish the date of an initial Minnesota health care program application by providing the county agency or Department of Human Services with provider identification and a temporary unique identifier for the applicant.  The applicant must complete the remainder of the application and provide necessary verification before eligibility can be determined.  The applicant must complete the application within the time periods required under the medical assistance program as specified in Minnesota Rules, parts 9505.0015, subpart 5, and 9505.0090, subpart 2.  The county agency must assist the applicant in obtaining verification if necessary.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11241


 

(j) County agencies are authorized to use all automated databases containing information regarding recipients' or applicants' income in order to determine eligibility for general assistance medical care or MinnesotaCare.  Such use shall be considered sufficient in order to determine eligibility and premium payments by the county agency.

 

(k) General assistance medical care is not available for a person in a correctional facility unless the person is detained by law for less than one year in a county correctional or detention facility as a person accused or convicted of a crime, or admitted as an inpatient to a hospital on a criminal hold order, and the person is a recipient of general assistance medical care at the time the person is detained by law or admitted on a criminal hold order and as long as the person continues to meet other eligibility requirements of this subdivision.

 

(l) General assistance medical care is not available for applicants or recipients who do not cooperate with the county agency to meet the requirements of medical assistance.

 

(m) In determining the amount of assets of an individual eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), there shall be included any asset or interest in an asset, including an asset excluded under paragraph (a), that was given away, sold, or disposed of for less than fair market value within the 60 months preceding application for general assistance medical care or during the period of eligibility.  Any transfer described in this paragraph shall be presumed to have been for the purpose of establishing eligibility for general assistance medical care, unless the individual furnishes convincing evidence to establish that the transaction was exclusively for another purpose.  For purposes of this paragraph, the value of the asset or interest shall be the fair market value at the time it was given away, sold, or disposed of, less the amount of compensation received.  For any uncompensated transfer, the number of months of ineligibility, including partial months, shall be calculated by dividing the uncompensated transfer amount by the average monthly per person payment made by the medical assistance program to skilled nursing facilities for the previous calendar year.  The individual shall remain ineligible until this fixed period has expired.  The period of ineligibility may exceed 30 months, and a reapplication for benefits after 30 months from the date of the transfer shall not result in eligibility unless and until the period of ineligibility has expired.  The period of ineligibility begins in the month the transfer was reported to the county agency, or if the transfer was not reported, the month in which the county agency discovered the transfer, whichever comes first.  For applicants, the period of ineligibility begins on the date of the first approved application.

 

(n) When determining eligibility for any state benefits under this subdivision, the income and resources of all noncitizens shall be deemed to include their sponsor's income and resources as defined in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, title IV, Public Law 104-193, sections 421 and 422, and subsequently set out in federal rules.

 

(o) Undocumented noncitizens and nonimmigrants are ineligible for general assistance medical care.  For purposes of this subdivision, a nonimmigrant is an individual in one or more of the classes listed in United States Code, title 8, section 1101, subsection (a), paragraph (15), and an undocumented noncitizen is an individual who resides in the United States without the approval or acquiescence of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

 

(p) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a noncitizen who is ineligible for medical assistance due to the deeming of a sponsor's income and resources, is ineligible for general assistance medical care.

 

(q) Effective July 1, 2003, general assistance medical care emergency services end.

 

Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.04, subdivision 7b, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 7b.  Annual income limits adjustment.  The commissioner shall adjust the income limits under this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal poverty guidelines following publication by the United States Department of Health and Human Services except that the income standards shall not go below those in effect on July 1, 2009."


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11242


 

      Delete the title and insert:

 

      "A bill for an act relating to human services; changing health care eligibility provisions; making changes to individualized education plan requirements; state health access program; children's health insurance reauthorization act; long-term care partnership; asset transfers; community clinics; dental benefits; prior authorization for health services; drug formulary committee; preferred drug list; multisource drugs; administrative uniformity committee; health plans; claims against the state; income standards for eligibility; prepaid health plans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 62A.045; 62Q.80; 62S.24, subdivision 8; 256B.055, subdivision 10; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivision 6; 256B.0625, subdivisions 13c, 13g, 25, 30, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04, subdivision 7b; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 15C.13; 256B.032; 256B.056, subdivision 1c; 256B.0571, subdivision 8; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e, 26; 256B.69, subdivisions 5a, 23; 256D.03, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62S; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 256B.0571, subdivision 10; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, 5."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      Abeler moved to amend S. F. No. 3027, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

      Page 6, line 14, after "less" insert "for an individual"

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      S. F. No.  3027, A bill for an act relating to human services; changing health care eligibility provisions; making changes to individualized education plan requirements; state health access program; children's health insurance reauthorization act; long-term care partnership; asset transfers; community clinics; dental benefits; prior authorization for health services; drug formulary committee; preferred drug list; multisource drugs; administrative uniformity committee; health plans; claims against the state; income standards for eligibility; prepaid health plans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 62A.045; 62Q.80; 62S.24, subdivision 8; 256B.055, subdivision 10; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivision 6; 256B.0625, subdivisions 13c, 13g, 25, 30, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04, subdivision 7b; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 15C.13; 256B.056, subdivision 1c; 256B.0571, subdivision 8; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e, 26; 256B.69, subdivisions 5a, 23; 256D.03, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62S; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 256B.0571, subdivision 10; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, 5.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

      The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 123 yeas and 10 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Demmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Eastlund

Eken

Emmer

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11243


 

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Seifert

Sertich

Shimanski

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Buesgens

Dean

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Garofalo

Hoppe

Kohls

Peppin

Scott

Severson


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      S. F. No. 2974 was reported to the House.

 

 

Abeler, Thissen and Huntley  moved to amend S. F. No. 2974, the third engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 18, after line 5, insert:

 

"Sec. 9.  NONSUBMISSION OF HEALTH CARE CLAIM BY CLEARINGHOUSE; SIGNIFICANT DISRUPTION. 

 

A situation shall be considered a significant disruption to normal operations that materially affects the provider's or facility's ability to conduct business in a normal manner and to submit claims on a timely basis under Minnesota Statutes, section 62Q.75, if:

 

(1) a clearinghouse loses, or otherwise does not submit, a health care claim as required by Minnesota Statutes, section 62J.536; and

 

(2) the provider or facility can substantiate that it submitted a complete claim to the clearinghouse within provisions stated in contract or six months of the date of service, whichever is less.

 

This section expires January 1, 2012."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11244


 

Dean moved to amend S. F. No. 2974, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 13, line 24, before "A" insert "(a)"

 

Page 13, after line 30, insert:

 

"(b) No data obtained from the electronic transmission of patients' medical records may be used by any government entity to restrict access to medical treatment options that are currently available to patients, based on age, quality of life, or category of illness."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      Peppin offered an amendment to S. F. No. 2974, the third engrossment, as amended.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Huntley raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the Peppin amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled the point of order well taken and the Peppin amendment out of order.

 

 

      Peppin appealed the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called.  There were 73 yeas and 60 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Eken

Falk

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Laine

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11245


 

Faust

Fritz

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Haws

Holberg

Hoppe

Hosch

Howes

Juhnke

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Lenczewski

Loon

Mack

Marquart

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Olin

Otremba

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Sterner

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich should stand.

 

 

      S. F. No. 2974, A bill for an act relating to health; amending provisions for electronic health record technology; providing for administrative penalties; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 62J.495, subdivisions 1a, 3, by adding a subdivision; 62J.497, subdivisions 4, 5; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62J.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

      The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 96 yeas and 37 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11246


 

      H. F. No. 2614 was reported to the House.

 

 

Huntley moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 18, line 19, delete "7.5" and insert "4.5"

 

Page 18, line 21, delete everything after "January 1," and insert "2011, through December 31, 2012,"

 

Page 18, after line 22, insert:

 

"(j) Payment rates for fee-for-service medical assistance admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2013, for admissions for the following diagnosis-related groups:  202 peds bronchitis and asthma with major condition; 789 neonates, died or transferred to another acute care facility; 790 extreme immaturity or respiratory distress syndrome; 791 prematurity with major problems; 793 full term neonate with major problems; 794 neonate with other significant problems; 881 depressive neuroses; 885 psychoses; and 886 behavior and developmental disorders, shall be increased for these diagnosis-related groups at a percentage calculated to cost no more than a total of $7,200,000 per fiscal year, including state and federal shares.  For purposes of this paragraph, medical assistance does not include general assistance medical care.  The commissioner shall adjust rates to a prepaid health plan under contract with the commissioner on a temporary basis to reflect payments provided in this paragraph, and prepaid health plans are required to increase rates to providers under contract on a temporary basis to reflect payments provided in this paragraph.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective July 1, 2011."

 

Page 18, delete section 5

 

Page 36, line 4, delete "1.4" and insert "1.3"

 

Page 41, delete lines 6 to 23 and insert:

 

"(f) Effective for services rendered on or after October 1, 2010, medical assistance payment for dental services for state-operated dental clinics shall be paid on a cost-based payment system that is based on the cost-finding methods and allowable costs of the Medicare program.  This paragraph is effective January 1, 2011, for enrollees in managed care receiving services at state-operated dental clinics.

 

(g) Effective beginning with fiscal year 2011, if the payments to state-operated dental clinics in paragraph (f), including state and federal shares, are less than $1,800,000 per year, a supplemental state payment, equal to the difference between the total payments in paragraph (f) and $1,800,000 shall be made from the general fund to state-operated services to operate the dental clinics.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective January 1, 2011."

 

Page 62, after line 22, insert:

 

"Sec. 62.  Hennepin and Ramsey Counties Pilot Program.  (a) The commissioner, upon federal approval of a new waiver request or amendment of an existing demonstration, may establish a pilot program in Hennepin County or Ramsey County, or both, to test alternative and innovative integrated health care delivery networks.

 

(b) Individuals eligible for the pilot program shall be individuals who are eligible for medical assistance under section 256B.055, subdivision 15, and who reside in Hennepin County or Ramsey County.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11247


 

(c) Individuals enrolled in the pilot shall be enrolled in an integrated health care delivery network in their county of residence.  The integrated health care delivery network in Hennepin County shall be a network, such as an accountable care organization or a community-based collaborative care network, created by or including Hennepin County Medical Center.  The integrated health care delivery network in Ramsey County shall be a network, such as an accountable care organization or community-based collaborative care network, created by or including Regions Hospital.

 

(d) The commissioner shall cap pilot program enrollment at 7,000 enrollees for Hennepin County and 3,500 enrollees for Ramsey County.

 

(e) In developing a payment system for the pilot programs, the commissioner shall establish a total cost of care for the recipients enrolled in the pilot programs that equals the cost of care that would otherwise be spent for these enrollees in the prepaid medical assistance program.

 

(f) Counties may transfer funds necessary to support the nonfederal share of payments for integrated health care delivery networks in their county.  Such transfers per county shall not exceed 15 percent of the expected expenses for county enrollees.

 

(g) The commissioner shall apply to the federal government for, or as appropriate, cooperate with counties, providers, or other entities that are applying for any applicable grant or demonstration under the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, Public Law 111-148, or the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152, that would further the purposes of or assist in the creation of an integrated health care delivery network for the purposes of this subdivision, including, but not limited to, a global payment demonstration or the community-based collaborative care network grants."

 

Page 62, delete section 63

 

Page 75, line 19, delete "beginning" and insert "for the rate period" and after "2010" insert ", to June 30, 2011"

 

Page 78, line 11, delete "beginning" and insert "for the rate period" and delete "2009" and insert "2010, to June 30, 2011"

 

Page 100, after line 6, insert:

 

"Sec. 22.  AUTISM PREVALENCE. 

 

A task force of five members of the house of representatives shall be appointed to study the prevalence of autism in the Somali community.  Four members shall be appointed by the speaker of the house, and one member shall be appointed by the minority leader.  Members of the task force shall be paid a per diem as provided in Minnesota Statutes, sections 3.099 and 3.101.  Frequency of the meetings shall be determined by the members of task force, but in no case may the task force have less than three meetings.  The task force shall issue a report and legislative proposals to the chairs of the standing committees with jurisdiction over health and education no later than January 1, 2011."

 

Page 154, delete lines 14 to 20

 

Page 155, delete lines 1 to 7

 

Page 156, delete lines 30 to 34

 

Page 157, delete lines 1 to 7


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11248


 

Page 157, line 14, delete "(4)" and insert "(1)"

 

Page 157, line 19, delete "(5)" and insert "(2)"

 

Page 157, line 25, delete "(6)" and insert "(3)"

 

Page 159, delete lines 9 to 13

 

Page 159, line 14, delete "12,854,000" and insert "9,000,000"

 

Page 159, after line 14, insert:

 

"State-Operated Services.  Of this appropriation, $8,300,000 in fiscal year 2011 is for the commissioner to maintain dental clinics, the METO program, and other residential adult mental health services.

 

Dental Clinics.  $700,000 is to continue the operation of the dental clinics in Brainerd, Cambridge, Faribault, Fergus Falls, and Willmar.  The commissioner shall continue to bill for services provided to obtain medical assistance critical access dental payments and cost-based payment rates as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.76, subdivision 2.  The commissioner shall not close any of the state-operated dental clinics without specific legislative approval.  This appropriation is onetime."

 

Page 159, after line 33, insert:

 

"(1) Childrens Services Grants                                                                                                              -0-                     (897,000)"

 

Page 159, line 34, delete "(1)" and insert "(2)"

 

Page 160, line 1, delete "(2)" and insert "(3)"

 

Page 160, line 3, delete "(3)" and insert "(4)"

 

Page 160, line 5, delete "(4)" and insert "(5)"

 

Page 160, line 7, delete "(5)" and insert "(6)"

 

Page 163, after line 23, insert:

 

"Subd. 5.  Office of Minority and Multicultural Health                                                       -0-                           25,000

 

$25,000 from the general fund in fiscal year 2011 is for purposes of the Autism Prevalence Task Force."

 

Page 176, line 15, after "$28,000,000" insert "in fiscal year 2011" and after the period, insert "This rider is effective the day following final enactment."


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11249


 

Page 194, line 2, delete "$38,475,000" and insert "$37,860,000" and delete "$14,758,000" and insert "$15,958,000"

 

Page 194, line 3, delete "$35,058,000" and insert "$37,109,000"

 

Amend the appropriations by the specified amounts and correct the totals and the appropriations by fund accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Clark moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 149, after line 12, insert:

 

"This appropriation is for food shelf programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 256E.34."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Hornstein moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 33, after line 8, insert:

 

"Sec. 23.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.441, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 60.  Nursing facility rate reductions effective July 1, 2010.  (a) Effective for the rate period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating payment rate of each nursing facility reimbursed under this section or section 256B.434 by 2.0 percent of the operating payment rate in effect on June 30, 2010.

 

(b) Effective July 1, 2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating payment rate of each nursing facility reimbursed under this section or section 256B.434 by 1.5 percent.

 

Sec. 24.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.5012, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 9.  ICF/MR rate reductions effective July 1, 2010.  Effective for the rate period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating payment rate of each facility reimbursed under this section by 2.0 percent of the operating payment rates in effect on June 30, 2010.  Effective July 1, 2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating payment rate of each facility reimbursed under this section by 1.5 percent."

 

Page 63, after line 3, insert:

 

"Sec. 64.  PROVIDER RATE AND GRANT REDUCTIONS. 

 

(a) The commissioner of human services, for the rate period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, shall increase grants, allocations, reimbursement rates, or rate limits, as applicable, by 2.0 percent from the applicable amount in effect on June 30, 2010.  Effective July 1, 2011, the commissioner of human services shall increase grants, allocations, reimbursement rates, or rate limits, as applicable, by 1.5 percent.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11250


 

(b) The rate changes described in this section must be provided to:

 

(1) home and community-based waivered services for persons with developmental disabilities or related conditions, including consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.501;

 

(2) home and community-based waivered services for the elderly, including consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0915;

 

(3) waivered services under community alternatives for disabled individuals, including consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.49;

 

(4) community alternative care waivered services, including consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.49;

 

(5) traumatic brain injury waivered services, including consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.49;

 

(6) nursing services and home health services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivision 6a;

 

(7) personal care services and qualified professional supervision of personal care services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivisions 6a and 19a;

 

(8) private duty nursing services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivision 7;

 

(9) day training and habilitation services for adults with developmental disabilities or related conditions under Minnesota Statutes, sections 252.40 to 252.46, including the additional cost of rate adjustments on day training and habilitation services, provided as a social service under Minnesota Statutes, section 256M.60;

 

(10) alternative care services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0913;

 

(11) semi-independent living services (SILS) under Minnesota Statutes, section 252.275, including SILS funding under county social services grants formerly funded under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 256I;

 

(12) community support services for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults with mental illness who use or wish to use sign language as their primary means of communication under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.01, subdivision 2; and deaf and hard-of-hearing grants under Minnesota Statutes, sections 256C.233, 256C.25, and 256C.261; Laws 1985, First Special Session chapter 9, article 1; Laws 1997, chapter 203, article 1, section 2, subdivision 8, as amended by Laws 1997, First Special Session chapter 5, section 20; and Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 19, section 3, subdivision 8, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 317, section 3;

 

(13) consumer support grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.476;

 

(14) family support grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 252.32;

 

(15) aging grants under Minnesota Statutes, sections 256.975 to 256.977, 256B.0917, and 256B.0928;

 

(16) disability linkage line grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.01, subdivision 24; and

 

(17) housing access grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0658."


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11251


 

Page 98, after line 36, insert:

 

"Sec. 19.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 289A.08, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Corporations.  (a) A corporation that is subject to the state's jurisdiction to tax under section 290.014, subdivision 5, must file a return, except that a foreign operating corporation as defined in section 290.01, subdivision 6b, is not required to file a return.

 

(b) Members of a unitary business that are required to file a combined report on one return must designate a member of the unitary business to be responsible for tax matters, including the filing of returns, the payment of taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, or any other payment, and for the receipt of refunds of taxes or interest paid in excess of taxes lawfully due.  The designated member must be a member of the unitary business that is filing the single combined report and either:

 

(1) a corporation that is subject to the taxes imposed by chapter 290; or

 

(2) a corporation that is not subject to the taxes imposed by chapter 290:

 

(i) Such corporation consents by filing the return as a designated member under this clause to remit taxes, penalties, interest, or additions to tax due from the members of the unitary business subject to tax, and receive refunds or other payments on behalf of other members of the unitary business.  The member designated under this clause is a "taxpayer" for the purposes of this chapter and chapter 270C, and is liable for any liability imposed on the unitary business under this chapter and chapter 290.

 

(ii) If the state does not otherwise have the jurisdiction to tax the member designated under this clause, consenting to be the designated member does not create the jurisdiction to impose tax on the designated member, other than as described in item (i).

 

(iii) The member designated under this clause must apply for a business tax account identification number.

 

(c) The commissioner shall adopt rules for the filing of one return on behalf of the members of an affiliated group of corporations that are required to file a combined report.  All members of an affiliated group that are required to file a combined report must file one return on behalf of the members of the group under rules adopted by the commissioner.

 

(d) If a corporation claims on a return that it has paid tax in excess of the amount of taxes lawfully due, that corporation must include on that return information necessary for payment of the tax in excess of the amount lawfully due by electronic means.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.

 

Sec. 20.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 290.01, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5.  Domestic corporation.  The term "domestic" when applied to a corporation means a corporation:

 

(1) created or organized in the United States, or under the laws of the United States or of any state, the District of Columbia, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing but not including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession of the United States;

 

(2) which qualifies as a DISC, as defined in section 992(a) of the Internal Revenue Code; or


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11252


 

(3) which qualifies as a FSC, as defined in section 922 of the Internal Revenue Code.;

 

(4) which is incorporated in a tax haven;

 

(5) which is engaged in activity in a tax haven sufficient for the tax haven to impose a net income tax under United States constitutional standards and section 290.015, and which reports that 20 percent or more of its income is attributable to business in the tax haven; or

 

(6) which has the average of its property, payroll, and sales factors, as defined under section 290.191, within the 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia of 20 percent or more.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.

 

Sec. 21.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 290.01, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 5c.  Tax haven.  (a) "Tax haven" means a foreign jurisdiction designated under this subdivision.

 

(b) The commissioner may designate a foreign jurisdiction as a tax haven by administrative rule if the jurisdiction:

 

(1) has no or nominal effective tax on the relevant income; and

 

(2)(i) has laws or practices that prevent effective exchange of information for tax purposes with other governments on taxpayers benefiting from the tax regime;

 

(ii) has a tax regime that lacks transparency.  A tax regime lacks transparency if the details of legislative, legal, or administrative provisions are not open and apparent or are not consistently applied among similarly situated taxpayers, or if the information needed by tax authorities to determine a taxpayer's correct tax liability, such as accounting records and underlying documentation, is not adequately available;

 

(iii) facilitates the establishment of foreign-owned entities without the need for a local substantive presence or prohibits these entities from having any commercial impact on the local economy;

 

(iv) explicitly or implicitly excludes the jurisdiction's resident taxpayers from taking advantage of the tax regime's benefits or prohibits enterprises that benefit from the regime from operating in the jurisdiction's domestic markets; or

 

(v) has created a tax regime that is favorable for tax avoidance, based upon an overall assessment of relevant factors, including whether the jurisdiction has a significant untaxed offshore financial or other services sector relative to its overall economy.

 

(c) The following foreign jurisdictions are deemed to be tax havens, unless the commissioner, by revenue notice, provides notification that the jurisdiction no longer satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) and removes the jurisdiction from the list:

 

(1) Anguilla;

 

(2) Antigua and Barbuda;

 

(3) Aruba;


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11253


 

(4) Bahamas;

 

(5) Barbados;

 

(6) Belize;

 

(7) Bermuda;

 

(8) British Virgin Islands;

 

(9) Cayman Islands;

 

(10) Cook Islands;

 

(11) Dominica;

 

(12) Gibraltar;

 

(13) Grenada;

 

(14) Guernsey-Sark-Alderney;

 

(15) Isle of Man;

 

(16) Jersey;

 

(17) Latvia;

 

(18) Liechtenstein;

 

(19) Luxembourg;

 

(20) Nauru;

 

(21) Netherlands Antilles;

 

(22) Panama;

 

(23) Samoa;

 

(24) St. Kitts and Nevis;

 

(25) St. Lucia;

 

(26) St. Vincent and Grenadines;

 

(27) Turks and Caicos; and

 

(28) Vanuatu.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11254


 

(d) The commissioner shall revoke a foreign jurisdiction's listing under paragraph (b) or (c), as applicable, if the United States enters into a tax treaty or other agreement with the foreign jurisdiction that provides for prompt, obligatory, and automatic exchange of information with the United States government relevant to enforcing the provisions of federal tax laws and the treaty or other agreement was in effect for the taxable year.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.

 

Sec. 22.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 290.01, subdivision 19c, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 19c.  Corporations; additions to federal taxable income.  For corporations, there shall be added to federal taxable income:

 

(1) the amount of any deduction taken for federal income tax purposes for income, excise, or franchise taxes based on net income or related minimum taxes, including but not limited to the tax imposed under section 290.0922, paid by the corporation to Minnesota, another state, a political subdivision of another state, the District of Columbia, or any foreign country or possession of the United States;

 

(2) interest not subject to federal tax upon obligations of:  the United States, its possessions, its agencies, or its instrumentalities; the state of Minnesota or any other state, any of its political or governmental subdivisions, any of its municipalities, or any of its governmental agencies or instrumentalities; the District of Columbia; or Indian tribal governments;

 

(3) exempt-interest dividends received as defined in section 852(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(4) the amount of any net operating loss deduction taken for federal income tax purposes under section 172 or 832(c)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code or operations loss deduction under section 810 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(5) the amount of any special deductions taken for federal income tax purposes under sections 241 to 247 and 965 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(6) losses from the business of mining, as defined in section 290.05, subdivision 1, clause (a), that are not subject to Minnesota income tax;

 

(7) the amount of any capital losses deducted for federal income tax purposes under sections 1211 and 1212 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(8) the exempt foreign trade income of a foreign sales corporation under sections 921(a) and 291 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(9) the amount of percentage depletion deducted under sections 611 through 614 and 291 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(10) for certified pollution control facilities placed in service in a taxable year beginning before December 31, 1986, and for which amortization deductions were elected under section 169 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through December 31, 1985, the amount of the amortization deduction allowed in computing federal taxable income for those facilities;

 

(11) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, the amount of any deemed dividend from a foreign operating corporation determined pursuant to section 290.17, subdivision 4, paragraph (g).  The deemed dividend shall be reduced by the amount of the addition to income required by clauses (20), (21), (22), and (23);


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11255


 

(12) the amount of a partner's pro rata share of net income which does not flow through to the partner because the partnership elected to pay the tax on the income under section 6242(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(13) the amount of net income excluded under section 114 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(14) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, any increase in subpart F income, as defined in section 952(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the taxable year when subpart F income is calculated without regard to the provisions of Division C, title III, section 303(b) of Public Law 110-343;

 

(15) 80 percent of the depreciation deduction allowed under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code.  For purposes of this clause, if the taxpayer has an activity that in the taxable year generates a deduction for depreciation under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A) and the activity generates a loss for the taxable year that the taxpayer is not allowed to claim for the taxable year, "the depreciation allowed under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A)" for the taxable year is limited to excess of the depreciation claimed by the activity under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A) over the amount of the loss from the activity that is not allowed in the taxable year.  In succeeding taxable years when the losses not allowed in the taxable year are allowed, the depreciation under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A) is allowed;

 

(16) 80 percent of the amount by which the deduction allowed by section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code exceeds the deduction allowable by section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 2003;

 

(17) to the extent deducted in computing federal taxable income, the amount of the deduction allowable under section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(18) the exclusion allowed under section 139A of the Internal Revenue Code for federal subsidies for prescription drug plans;

 

(19) the amount of expenses disallowed under section 290.10, subdivision 2;

 

(20) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, an amount equal to the interest and intangible expenses, losses, and costs paid, accrued, or incurred by any member of the taxpayer's unitary group to or for the benefit of a corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary business group that qualifies as a foreign operating corporation.  For purposes of this clause, intangible expenses and costs include:

 

(i) expenses, losses, and costs for, or related to, the direct or indirect acquisition, use, maintenance or management, ownership, sale, exchange, or any other disposition of intangible property;

 

(ii) losses incurred, directly or indirectly, from factoring transactions or discounting transactions;

 

(iii) royalty, patent, technical, and copyright fees;

 

(iv) licensing fees; and

 

(v) other similar expenses and costs.

 

For purposes of this clause, "intangible property" includes stocks, bonds, patents, patent applications, trade names, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, mask works, trade secrets, and similar types of intangible assets.

 

This clause does not apply to any item of interest or intangible expenses or costs paid, accrued, or incurred, directly or indirectly, to a foreign operating corporation with respect to such item of income to the extent that the income to the foreign operating corporation is income from sources without the United States as defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the Internal Revenue Code;


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11256


 

(21) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, except as already included in the taxpayer's taxable income pursuant to clause (20), any interest income and income generated from intangible property received or accrued by a foreign operating corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary group.  For purposes of this clause, income generated from intangible property includes:

 

(i) income related to the direct or indirect acquisition, use, maintenance or management, ownership, sale, exchange, or any other disposition of intangible property;

 

(ii) income from factoring transactions or discounting transactions;

 

(iii) royalty, patent, technical, and copyright fees;

 

(iv) licensing fees; and

 

(v) other similar income.

 

For purposes of this clause, "intangible property" includes stocks, bonds, patents, patent applications, trade names, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, mask works, trade secrets, and similar types of intangible assets.

 

This clause does not apply to any item of interest or intangible income received or accrued by a foreign operating corporation with respect to such item of income to the extent that the income is income from sources without the United States as defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(22) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, the dividends attributable to the income of a foreign operating corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary group in an amount that is equal to the dividends paid deduction of a real estate investment trust under section 561(a) of the Internal Revenue Code for amounts paid or accrued by the real estate investment trust to the foreign operating corporation;

 

(23) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, the income of a foreign operating corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary group in an amount that is equal to gains derived from the sale of real or personal property located in the United States;

 

(24) the additional amount allowed as a deduction for donation of computer technology and equipment under section 170(e)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, to the extent deducted from taxable income; and

 

(25) discharge of indebtedness income resulting from reacquisition of business indebtedness and deferred under section 108(i) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.

 

Sec. 23.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 290.01, subdivision 19d, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 19d.  Corporations; modifications decreasing federal taxable income.  For corporations, there shall be subtracted from federal taxable income after the increases provided in subdivision 19c:

 

(1) the amount of foreign dividend gross-up added to gross income for federal income tax purposes under section 78 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(2) the amount of salary expense not allowed for federal income tax purposes due to claiming the work opportunity credit under section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code;


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11257


 

(3) any dividend (not including any distribution in liquidation) paid within the taxable year by a national or state bank to the United States, or to any instrumentality of the United States exempt from federal income taxes, on the preferred stock of the bank owned by the United States or the instrumentality;

 

(4) amounts disallowed for intangible drilling costs due to differences between this chapter and the Internal Revenue Code in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, as follows:

 

(i) to the extent the disallowed costs are represented by physical property, an amount equal to the allowance for depreciation under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09, subdivision 7, subject to the modifications contained in subdivision 19e; and

 

(ii) to the extent the disallowed costs are not represented by physical property, an amount equal to the allowance for cost depletion under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09, subdivision 8;

 

(5) the deduction for capital losses pursuant to sections 1211 and 1212 of the Internal Revenue Code, except that:

 

(i) for capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, capital loss carrybacks shall not be allowed;

 

(ii) for capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, a capital loss carryover to each of the 15 taxable years succeeding the loss year shall be allowed;

 

(iii) for capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, a capital loss carryback to each of the three taxable years preceding the loss year, subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.16, shall be allowed; and

 

(iv) for capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, a capital loss carryover to each of the five taxable years succeeding the loss year to the extent such loss was not used in a prior taxable year and subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.16, shall be allowed;

 

(6) an amount for interest and expenses relating to income not taxable for federal income tax purposes, if (i) the income is taxable under this chapter and (ii) the interest and expenses were disallowed as deductions under the provisions of section 171(a)(2), 265 or 291 of the Internal Revenue Code in computing federal taxable income;

 

(7) in the case of mines, oil and gas wells, other natural deposits, and timber for which percentage depletion was disallowed pursuant to subdivision 19c, clause (9), a reasonable allowance for depletion based on actual cost.  In the case of leases the deduction must be apportioned between the lessor and lessee in accordance with rules prescribed by the commissioner.  In the case of property held in trust, the allowable deduction must be apportioned between the income beneficiaries and the trustee in accordance with the pertinent provisions of the trust, or if there is no provision in the instrument, on the basis of the trust's income allocable to each;

 

(8) for certified pollution control facilities placed in service in a taxable year beginning before December 31, 1986, and for which amortization deductions were elected under section 169 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through December 31, 1985, an amount equal to the allowance for depreciation under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09, subdivision 7;

 

(9) amounts included in federal taxable income that are due to refunds of income, excise, or franchise taxes based on net income or related minimum taxes paid by the corporation to Minnesota, another state, a political subdivision of another state, the District of Columbia, or a foreign country or possession of the United States to the extent that the taxes were added to federal taxable income under section 290.01, subdivision 19c, clause (1), in a prior taxable year;


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11258


 

(10) 80 percent of royalties, fees, or other like income accrued or received from a foreign operating corporation or a foreign corporation which is part of the same unitary business as the receiving corporation, unless the income resulting from such payments or accruals is income from sources within the United States as defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(11) income or gains from the business of mining as defined in section 290.05, subdivision 1, clause (a), that are not subject to Minnesota franchise tax;

 

(12) the amount of disability access expenditures in the taxable year which are not allowed to be deducted or capitalized under section 44(d)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(13) the amount of qualified research expenses not allowed for federal income tax purposes under section 280C(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, but only to the extent that the amount exceeds the amount of the credit allowed under section 290.068;

 

(14) the amount of salary expenses not allowed for federal income tax purposes due to claiming the Indian employment credit under section 45A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(15) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2008, the amount of the federal small ethanol producer credit allowed under section 40(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code which is included in gross income under section 87 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(16) for a corporation whose foreign sales corporation, as defined in section 922 of the Internal Revenue Code, constituted a foreign operating corporation during any taxable year ending before January 1, 1995, and a return was filed by August 15, 1996, claiming the deduction under section 290.21, subdivision 4, for income received from the foreign operating corporation, an amount equal to 1.23 multiplied by the amount of income excluded under section 114 of the Internal Revenue Code, provided the income is not income of a foreign operating company;

 

(17) for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, any decrease in subpart F income, as defined in section 952(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the taxable year when subpart F income is calculated without regard to the provisions of Division C, title III, section 303(b) of Public Law 110-343;

 

(18) in each of the five tax years immediately following the tax year in which an addition is required under subdivision 19c, clause (15), an amount equal to one-fifth of the delayed depreciation.  For purposes of this clause, "delayed depreciation" means the amount of the addition made by the taxpayer under subdivision 19c, clause (15).  The resulting delayed depreciation cannot be less than zero;

 

(19) in each of the five tax years immediately following the tax year in which an addition is required under subdivision 19c, clause (16), an amount equal to one-fifth of the amount of the addition; and

 

(20) to the extent included in federal taxable income, discharge of indebtedness income resulting from reacquisition of business indebtedness included in federal taxable income under section 108(i) of the Internal Revenue Code.  This subtraction applies only to the extent that the income was included in net income in a prior year as a result of the addition under section 290.01, subdivision 19c, clause (25).

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.

 

Sec. 24.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 290.17, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4.  Unitary business principle.  (a) If a trade or business conducted wholly within this state or partly within and partly without this state is part of a unitary business, the entire income of the unitary business is subject to apportionment pursuant to section 290.191.  Notwithstanding subdivision 2, paragraph (c), none of the income of


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11259


 

a unitary business is considered to be derived from any particular source and none may be allocated to a particular place except as provided by the applicable apportionment formula.  The provisions of this subdivision do not apply to business income subject to subdivision 5, income of an insurance company, or income of an investment company determined under section 290.36. 

 

(b) The term "unitary business" means business activities or operations which result in a flow of value between them.  The term may be applied within a single legal entity or between multiple entities and without regard to whether each entity is a sole proprietorship, a corporation, a partnership or a trust.

 

(c) Unity is presumed whenever there is unity of ownership, operation, and use, evidenced by centralized management or executive force, centralized purchasing, advertising, accounting, or other controlled interaction, but the absence of these centralized activities will not necessarily evidence a nonunitary business.  Unity is also presumed when business activities or operations are of mutual benefit, dependent upon or contributory to one another, either individually or as a group.

 

(d) Where a business operation conducted in Minnesota is owned by a business entity that carries on business activity outside the state different in kind from that conducted within this state, and the other business is conducted entirely outside the state, it is presumed that the two business operations are unitary in nature, interrelated, connected, and interdependent unless it can be shown to the contrary.

 

(e) Unity of ownership is not deemed to exist when a corporation is involved unless that corporation is a member of a group of two or more business entities and more than 50 percent of the voting stock of each member of the group is directly or indirectly owned by a common owner or by common owners, either corporate or noncorporate, or by one or more of the member corporations of the group.  For this purpose, the term "voting stock" shall include membership interests of mutual insurance holding companies formed under section 66A.40. 

 

(f) The net income and apportionment factors under section 290.191 or 290.20 of foreign corporations and other foreign entities which are part of a unitary business shall not be included in the net income or the apportionment factors of the unitary business.  A foreign corporation or other foreign entity which is required to file a return under this chapter shall file on a separate return basis.  The net income and apportionment factors under section 290.191 or 290.20 of foreign operating corporations shall not be included in the net income or the apportionment factors of the unitary business except as provided in paragraph (g).  The legislature intends that the provisions of this paragraph are not severable from the provisions of section 290.01, subdivision 5, clauses (4) to (6), and if any of those provisions are found to be unconstitutional, the provisions of this paragraph are void for the respective taxable years.

 

(g) The adjusted net income of a foreign operating corporation shall be deemed to be paid as a dividend on the last day of its taxable year to each shareholder thereof, in proportion to each shareholder's ownership, with which such corporation is engaged in a unitary business.  Such deemed dividend shall be treated as a dividend under section 290.21, subdivision 4. 

 

Dividends actually paid by a foreign operating corporation to a corporate shareholder which is a member of the same unitary business as the foreign operating corporation shall be eliminated from the net income of the unitary business in preparing a combined report for the unitary business.  The adjusted net income of a foreign operating corporation shall be its net income adjusted as follows:

 

(1) any taxes paid or accrued to a foreign country, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a United States possession or political subdivision of any of the foregoing shall be a deduction; and

 

(2) the subtraction from federal taxable income for payments received from foreign corporations or foreign operating corporations under section 290.01, subdivision 19d, clause (10), shall not be allowed. 


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11260


 

If a foreign operating corporation incurs a net loss, neither income nor deduction from that corporation shall be included in determining the net income of the unitary business.

 

(h) For purposes of determining the net income of a unitary business and the factors to be used in the apportionment of net income pursuant to section 290.191 or 290.20, there must be included only the income and apportionment factors of domestic corporations or other domestic entities other than foreign operating corporations that are determined to be part of the unitary business pursuant to this subdivision, notwithstanding that foreign corporations or other foreign entities might be included in the unitary business. 

 

(i) (h) Deductions for expenses, interest, or taxes otherwise allowable under this chapter that are connected with or allocable against dividends, deemed dividends described in paragraph (g), or royalties, fees, or other like income described in section 290.01, subdivision 19d, clause (10), shall not be disallowed. 

 

(j) (i) Each corporation or other entity, except a sole proprietorship, that is part of a unitary business must file combined reports as the commissioner determines.  On the reports, all intercompany transactions between entities included pursuant to paragraph (h) (g) must be eliminated and the entire net income of the unitary business determined in accordance with this subdivision is apportioned among the entities by using each entity's Minnesota factors for apportionment purposes in the numerators of the apportionment formula and the total factors for apportionment purposes of all entities included pursuant to paragraph (h) (g) in the denominators of the apportionment formula.

 

(k) (j) If a corporation has been divested from a unitary business and is included in a combined report for a fractional part of the common accounting period of the combined report:

 

(1) its income includable in the combined report is its income incurred for that part of the year determined by proration or separate accounting; and

 

(2) its sales, property, and payroll included in the apportionment formula must be prorated or accounted for separately.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009."

 

Page 100 , delete section 22 and insert:

 

"Sec. 22.  REPEALER. 

 

(a) Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 254B.02, subdivisions 2, 3, and 4; and 254B.09, subdivisions 4, 5, and 7, and Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26, subdivision 3, are repealed.

 

(b) Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 290.01, subdivision 6b; and 290.0921, subdivision 7, are repealed effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009."

 

Page 148, delete lines 24 to 31

 

Page 148, delete line 32

 

Page 149, delete lines 1 to 7

 

Page 157, delete lines 14 to 18

 

Page 157, renumber the clauses


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11261


 

Adjust amounts accordingly

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Kohls raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the Hornstein amendment was not in order.

 

 

      Speaker pro tempore Sertich submitted the following question to the House:  "Is it the judgment of the House that the Kohls point of order is well taken?"

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

CALL OF THE HOUSE

 

      On the motion of Kohls and on the demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.  The following members answered to their names:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Emmer

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mack

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

      Morrow moved that further proceedings of the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in the absentees.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11262


 

      The vote recurred on the question "Is it the judgment of the House that the Kohls point of order is well taken?" and the roll was called.  There were 58 yeas and 75 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Atkins

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Bunn

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dittrich

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Murphy, M.

Nornes

Obermueller

Pelowski

Peppin

Poppe

Rosenthal

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Sterner

Torkelson

Urdahl

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Persell

Peterson

Reinert

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      So it was the judgment of the House that the Kohls point of order was not well taken and the Hornstein amendment was in order.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Buesgens raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills that the Hornstein amendment was not in order.  Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled the point of order not well taken and the Hornstein amendment in order.

 

 

      Buesgens appealed the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called.  There were 85 yeas and 48 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11263


 

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Rosenthal

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Sterner

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich should stand.

 

 

CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED

 

      Morrow moved that the call of the House be lifted.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

Dean moved to amend the Hornstein amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 3, after line 9, insert:

 

"Page 80, line 18, delete "110" and insert "100""

 

Page 3, delete lines 10 to 36

 

Page 4, delete lines 1 to 33

 

Page 5, delete lines 1 to 36

 

Page 6, delete lines 1 to 35

 

Page 7, delete lines 1 to 36

 

Page 8, delete lines 1 to 36

 

Page 9, delete lines 1 to 34


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11264


 

Page 10, delete lines 1 to 36

 

Page 11, delete lines 1 to 36

 

Page 12, delete lines 1 to 35

 

Page 13, delete lines 1 to 35

 

Page 14, delete lines 1 to 36

 

Page 15, delete lines 1 to 19 and insert:

 

"Page 129, delete lines 13 and 14

 

Page 131, after line 26, insert:

 

"Sec. 11.  EFFECTIVE DATE. 

 

Sections 1 to 10 are effective January 1, 2014.""

 

Page 15, after line 24, insert:

 

"Page 160, delete lines 23 to 29, and insert:

 

"Statewide Health Improvement Program.  The funding for the statewide health improvement program, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.986, is canceled.

 

Family Planning Grants.  The funding for family planning grants, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.925, is canceled."

 

Page 194, delete lines 1 to 6 and insert "$27,000,000 is transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund.""

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called.               There were 43 yeas and 90 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers



Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11265


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      Brod moved to amend the Hornstein amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

      Page 5, line 18, delete ", unless the"

 

      Page 5, delete line 19

 

      Page 5, line 20, delete everything before the colon

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Hornstein amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.  There were 78 yeas and 55 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Poppe

Reinert

Rukavina

Sailer

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher



Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11266


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Bunn

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dittrich

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Peppin

Peterson

Rosenthal

Ruud

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.

 

 

Dean; Sanders; Gottwalt; Abeler; Smith; Severson; Murdock; Shimanski; Doepke; Mack; Buesgens; Hoppe; Emmer; Drazkowski; Scott; Anderson, B.; Zellers and Hackbarth moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 124, after line 12, insert:

 

"Section 1.  [62A.645] HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE NOT REQUIRED. 

 

No resident of this state, regardless of whether the individual has or is eligible for health insurance coverage under any policy or program provided by or through an employer, or a plan sponsored by the state or the federal government, shall be required to obtain or maintain a policy of individual insurance coverage.  No provision of state law shall render a resident of this state liable for any penalty, assessment, fee, or fine as a result of failure to procure or obtain health insurance coverage.  This section shall not apply to individuals voluntarily applying for coverage under medical assistance, MinnesotaCare, or general assistance medical care."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Dean et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 46 yeas and 86 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers



Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11267


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Huntley moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 157, delete lines 8 to 13

 

Renumber the clauses in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Gardner moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 100, after line 6, insert:

 

"Sec. 22.  PRESCRIPTION DRUG WASTE REDUCTION. 

 

The commissioner of human services, in cooperation with the commissioners of health, veterans affairs, and corrections, shall study prescription drug waste reduction techniques and technologies applicable to long-term care facilities, veterans nursing homes, and correctional facilities.  In conducting the study, the commissioners shall consult with the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, the University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota's Minnesota Technical Assistance Project, consumers, long-term care providers, and other interested parties.  The commissioners shall evaluate the extent to which new prescription drug waste reduction techniques and technologies can reduce the amount of prescription drugs that enter the waste stream and reduce state prescription drug costs.  The techniques and technologies studied must include, but are not limited to, daily, weekly, and automated dose dispensing.  The study must provide an estimate of the cost of adopting these and other techniques and technologies, and an estimate of waste reduction and state prescription drug savings that would result from


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11268


 

adoption.  The study must also evaluate methods of encouraging the adoption of effective drug waste reduction techniques and technologies.  The commissioner shall present recommendations on the adoption of new prescription drug waste reduction techniques and technologies to the legislature by December 15, 2010."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

Juhnke moved to amend the Gardner amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

      Page 1, line 8, after "with" insert "the Minnesota Pharmacists Association,"

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Kohls raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills that the Gardner amendment, as amended, was not in order.  Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled the point of order not well taken and the Gardner amendment, as amended, in order.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Gardner amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended.  The motion prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.

 

 

Scalze, Dittrich, Bunn, Peterson, Abeler, Peppin and Ruud moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 87, line 20, delete everything after "programs" and insert a period

 

Page 87, delete line 21 and insert "These programs must"

 

Page 87, line 22, after the period, insert "The state employee group insurance plan is not subject to this section until July 1, 2013, but must fully comply with this section on and after that date."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Fritz and Brod moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 83, after line 31, insert:

 

"(e) A health plan company is in compliance with this section if it does not include orally administered anticancer medication in the fourth tier of its pharmacy benefit."

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11269


 

Clark moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 131, after line 28, insert:

 

"Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62J.692, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4.  Distribution of funds.  (a) Following the distribution described under paragraph (b), the commissioner shall annually distribute the available medical education funds to all qualifying applicants based on a distribution formula that reflects a summation of two factors:

 

(1) a public program volume factor, which is determined by the total volume of public program revenue received by each training site as a percentage of all public program revenue received by all training sites in the fund pool; and

 

(2) a supplemental public program volume factor, which is determined by providing a supplemental payment of 20 percent of each training site's grant to training sites whose public program revenue accounted for at least 0.98 percent of the total public program revenue received by all eligible training sites.  Grants to training sites whose public program revenue accounted for less than 0.98 percent of the total public program revenue received by all eligible training sites shall be reduced by an amount equal to the total value of the supplemental payment.

 

Public program revenue for the distribution formula includes revenue from medical assistance, prepaid medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and prepaid general assistance medical care.  Training sites that receive no public program revenue are ineligible for funds available under this subdivision.  For purposes of determining training-site level grants to be distributed under paragraph (a), total statewide average costs per trainee for medical residents is based on audited clinical training costs per trainee in primary care clinical medical education programs for medical residents.  Total statewide average costs per trainee for dental residents is based on audited clinical training costs per trainee in clinical medical education programs for dental students.  Total statewide average costs per trainee for pharmacy residents is based on audited clinical training costs per trainee in clinical medical education programs for pharmacy students.

 

(b) $5,350,000 of the available medical education funds shall be distributed as follows:

 

(1) $1,475,000 to the University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview;

 

(2) $2,075,000 to the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry; and

 

(3) $1,800,000 to the Academic Health Center.  $150,000 of the funds distributed to the Academic Health Center under this paragraph shall be used for a program to assist internationally trained physicians who are legal residents and who commit to serving underserved Minnesota communities in a health professional shortage area to successfully compete for family medicine residency programs at the University of Minnesota.

 

(c) Funds distributed shall not be used to displace current funding appropriations from federal or state sources.

 

(d) Funds shall be distributed to the sponsoring institutions indicating the amount to be distributed to each of the sponsor's clinical medical education programs based on the criteria in this subdivision and in accordance with the commissioner's approval letter.  Each clinical medical education program must distribute funds allocated under paragraph (a) to the training sites as specified in the commissioner's approval letter.  Sponsoring institutions, which are accredited through an organization recognized by the Department of Education or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, may contract directly with training sites to provide clinical training.  To ensure the quality of clinical training, those accredited sponsoring institutions must:


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11270


 

(1) develop contracts specifying the terms, expectations, and outcomes of the clinical training conducted at sites; and

 

(2) take necessary action if the contract requirements are not met.  Action may include the withholding of payments under this section or the removal of students from the site.

 

(e) Any funds not distributed in accordance with the commissioner's approval letter must be returned to the medical education and research fund within 30 days of receiving notice from the commissioner.  The commissioner shall distribute returned funds to the appropriate training sites in accordance with the commissioner's approval letter.

 

(f) A maximum of $150,000 of the funds dedicated to the commissioner under section 297F.10, subdivision 1, clause (2), may be used by the commissioner for administrative expenses associated with implementing this section."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Loeffler, Huntley, Norton, Abeler and Ruud moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 130, after line 2, insert:

 

"(c) The commissioner of health shall apply for federal grants available under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, for purposes of funding wellness and prevention, and health improvement programs.  To the extent possible under federal law, the commissioner of health must utilize the state health improvement program, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.986, to implement grant programs related to wellness and prevention, and health improvement, for which the state receives funding under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148."

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Loeffler et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 92 yeas and 41 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, P.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11271


 

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Torkelson

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Thao and Juhnke moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 118, after line 14, insert:

 

"Sec. 10.  [144.059] VENDOR ACCREDITATION. 

 

A hospital or clinic that requires a vendor accreditation report prior to a vendor obtaining access to the facility shall accept a vendor accreditation report acquired from any generally accepted vendor accreditation service.  The hospital or clinic must not require the vendor to obtain an additional report if the vendor has already received a report for services provided at another hospital or clinic."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Abeler and Huntley moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 125, line 16, delete "five" and insert "four" and strike "two" and insert "three"

 

Page 129, line 23, before the semicolon, insert ", including a demonstration project for the specific population of childless adults under 75 percent of federal poverty guidelines that were to be served by the general assistance medical care program"

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11272


 

Murphy, E.; Brynaert; Jackson; Persell; Hilty; Morrow; Anzelc; Hosch; Murphy, M.; Ward; Sailer; Huntley; Reinert; Poppe; Juhnke and Lieder moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 28, delete section 20, and insert:

 

"Sec. 20.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0644, as amended by Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 6, is amended to read:

 

256B.0644 REIMBURSEMENT UNDER OTHER STATE HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS. 

 

(a) A vendor of medical care, as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 7, and a health maintenance organization, as defined in chapter 62D, must participate as a provider or contractor in the medical assistance program, general assistance medical care program, and MinnesotaCare as a condition of participating as a provider in health insurance plans and programs or contractor for state employees established under section 43A.18, the public employees insurance program under section 43A.316, for health insurance plans offered to local statutory or home rule charter city, county, and school district employees, the workers' compensation system under section 176.135, and insurance plans provided through the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association under sections 62E.01 to 62E.19.  The limitations on insurance plans offered to local government employees shall not be applicable in geographic areas where provider participation is limited by managed care contracts with the Department of Human Services.

 

(b) For providers other than health maintenance organizations, participation in the medical assistance program means that:

 

(1) the provider accepts new medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare patients;

 

(2) for providers other than dental service providers, at least 20 percent of the provider's patients are covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage; or

 

(3) for dental service providers, at least ten percent of the provider's patients are covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage, or the provider accepts new medical assistance and MinnesotaCare patients who are children with special health care needs.  For purposes of this section, "children with special health care needs" means children up to age 18 who:  (i) require health and related services beyond that required by children generally; and (ii) have or are at risk for a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional condition, including:  bleeding and coagulation disorders; immunodeficiency disorders; cancer; endocrinopathy; developmental disabilities; epilepsy, cerebral palsy, and other neurological diseases; visual impairment or deafness; Down syndrome and other genetic disorders; autism; fetal alcohol syndrome; and other conditions designated by the commissioner after consultation with representatives of pediatric dental providers and consumers.

 

(c) Patients seen on a volunteer basis by the provider at a location other than the provider's usual place of practice may be considered in meeting the participation requirement in this section.  The commissioner shall establish participation requirements for health maintenance organizations.  The commissioner shall provide lists of participating medical assistance providers on a quarterly basis to the commissioner of management and budget, the commissioner of labor and industry, and the commissioner of commerce.  Each of the commissioners shall develop and implement procedures to exclude as participating providers in the program or programs under their jurisdiction those providers who do not participate in the medical assistance program.  The commissioner of management and budget shall implement this section through contracts with participating health and dental carriers.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11273


 

(d) Any hospital or other provider that is participating in a coordinated care delivery system under section 256D.031, subdivision 6, or receives payments from the uncompensated care pool under section 256D.031, subdivision 8, shall not refuse to provide services to any patient enrolled in general assistance medical care regardless of the availability or the amount of payment.

 

(e) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b), participation in the general assistance medical care program applies only to pharmacy providers.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services determines, on May 15, 2010, that:  (1) 80 percent of general assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a coordinated care delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section 256D.031; or (2) the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access to care in all geographic areas of the state.  If the commissioner does not make this determination, this section is effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later."

 

Page 37, delete lines 1 to 3 and insert:

 

"EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services determines, on May 15, 2010, that:  (1) 80 percent of general assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a coordinated care delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section 256D.031; or (2) the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access to care in all geographic areas of the state.  If the commissioner does not make this determination, this section is effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later."

 

Page 45, line 23, delete "May" and insert "December"

 

Page 54, after line 33, insert:

 

"Sec. 53.  Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 12, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5.  Payment rates and contract modification; April 1, 2010, to May December 31, 2010.  (a) For the period April 1, 2010, to May December 31, 2010, general assistance medical care shall be paid on a fee-for-service basis.  Fee-for-service payment rates for services other than outpatient prescription drugs shall be set at 37 27 percent of the payment rate in effect on March 31, 2010.

 

(b) Outpatient prescription drugs covered under section 256D.03, subdivision 3, provided on or after April 1, 2010, to May December 31, 2010, shall be paid on a fee-for-service basis according to section 256B.0625, subdivisions 13 to 13g.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services determines, on May 15, 2010, that:  (1) 80 percent of general assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a coordinated care delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section 256D.031; or (2) the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access to care in all geographic areas of the state.  If the commissioner does not make this determination, this section is effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later."

 

Page 61, line 4, strike the existing language and delete the new language and insert "effective January 1, 2011."


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11274


 

Page 63, delete section 64, and insert:

 

"Sec. 64.  REPEALER. 

 

(a) Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 12, subdivisions 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, are repealed effective June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services determines, on May 15, 2010, that:  (1) 80 percent of general assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a coordinated care delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section 256D.031; or (2) the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access to care in all geographic areas of the state.  If the commissioner does not make this determination, this paragraph is effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later.

 

(b) Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, sections 12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; 18; and 19, are repealed 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later.

 

(c) Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256D.03, subdivisions 3a, 3b, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3, are repealed 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15 and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later.

 

(d) Upon federal approval of the amendments to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15 and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later, all remaining unspent appropriations for the program established by Laws 2010, chapter 200 are transferred to the health care access fund."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Juhnke, Falk, Thissen, Rukavina, Morrow, Koenen, Ward, Persell, Obermueller, Lenczewski and Johnson moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 63, after line 3, insert:

 

"Sec. 64.  SALARY REDUCTION; BENEFITS. 

 

(a) The salaries of the commissioner of human services, the assistant commissioner for chemical and mental health services, and all managerial employees of state-operated services who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement must be reduced by 20 percent until all full-time state-operated services employees who are subject to a collective bargaining agreement who have been subject to a 20 percent reduction in hours since May 1, 2009, have been offered the opportunity to return to full-time employment.  The Department of Human Services and affected employee groups or unions shall certify when all affected employees have been offered the opportunity to return to full-time employment.

 

(b) Cost savings resulting from the reduction in salaries for the commissioner, assistant commissioner, and managerial employees shall be expended to restore benefits and wages for the affected employee groups or unions who have been adversely affected by the reduction in hours and loss of benefits."


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11275


 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      Speaker pro tempore Sertich called Thissen to the Chair.

 

 

Drazkowski moved to amend the Juhnke et al amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 6, delete "who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement"

 

Page 1, lines 7 to 8, delete "who are subject to a collective bargaining agreement"

 

Page 1, line 10, delete "and affected employee groups or unions"

 

Page 1, line 15, delete "employee groups or unions" and insert "employees"

 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Juhnke et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 115 yeas and 18 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher



Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11276


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Bunn

Dean

Demmer

Drazkowski

Emmer

Gunther

Hackbarth

Lanning

Norton

Peppin

Scott

Shimanski

Torkelson

Zellers


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Fritz moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 19, after line 13, insert:

 

"Sec. 6.  [256B.012] SALINE ABORTION FUNDING BAN. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Funding restriction.  None of the funds appropriated under this chapter or chapter 256L, nor in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated under this chapter or chapter 256L, shall be expended for any saline abortion nor for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of saline abortion.  "Saline amniocentesis abortion" means a procedure whereby a saline solution is inserted into the amniotic sac for the purpose of killing the unborn child and artificially inducing labor.

 

Subd. 2.  Severability.  If any one or more provisions, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of this section or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is found to be unconstitutional, the same is hereby declared to be severable and the balance of this section shall remain effective notwithstanding such unconstitutionality.  The legislature hereby declares that it would have passed this section, and each provision, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more provision, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word be declared unconstitutional.

 

Subd. 3.  Supreme Court jurisdiction.  The Minnesota Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over an action challenging the constitutionality of this section and shall expedite the resolution of the action."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Fritz amendment and the roll was called.  There were 66 yeas and 66 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Emmer

Faust

Fritz

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Haws

Holberg

Hoppe

Hosch

Howes

Juhnke

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lieder

Loon

Mack

Marquart

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Murphy, M.

Nornes


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11277


 

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Pelowski

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Sterner

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dittrich

Falk

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Laine

Lesch

Liebling

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Paymar

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Hosch, Brod, Fritz, Scott, Peppin, Dean, Davids, Sanders, Juhnke and Abeler moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 25, after line 31, insert:

 

"Sec. 15.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 16a.  Provider reimbursement.  Provider reimbursement for abortion services under this section or chapter 256L must not exceed $300 per abortion."

 

Page 63, after line 17, insert:

 

"Sec. 65.  APPROPRIATION. 

 

(a) Any fiscal savings resulting from the cap on abortion services in section 15 are appropriated to the Department of Human Services for fiscal year 2011 for the purposes of the Mothers First program.

 

(b) Any fiscal savings resulting from the cap on abortion services in section 15 are appropriated to the Department of Human Services for children and economic assistance grants for fiscal years 2012 and 2013."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11278


 

Hortman, Simon, Huntley and Ruud moved to amend the Hosch et al amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 6, delete everything after "256L" and insert "is reduced by the amount of the reduction under section 256B.76, subdivision 1, paragraph (d)."

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Brod moved to amend the Hosch et al amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

      Page 1, line 4 of the Hortman et al amendment to the Hosch et al amendment, after "(d)" insert "in 2011 and $300 thereafter"

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Brod amendment to the Hosch et al amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.  There were 62 yeas and 71 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Emmer

Faust

Fritz

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Haws

Holberg

Hoppe

Hosch

Howes

Juhnke

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Lenczewski

Loon

Mack

Marquart

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Murphy, M.

Nornes

Olin

Pelowski

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Sterner

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Eken

Falk

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Laine

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Otremba

Paymar

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment, as amended, was not adopted.


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11279


 

      The question recurred on the Hosch et al amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.  There were 97 yeas and 35 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Emmer

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Haws

Holberg

Hortman

Hosch

Jackson

Juhnke

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lieder

Lillie

Loon

Mack

Marquart

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Murdock

Murphy, M.

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Bigham

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Greiling

Hausman

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hoppe

Hornstein

Howes

Huntley

Johnson

Kahn

Laine

Liebling

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Nelson

Newton

Paymar

Reinert

Simon

Thao

Thissen

Wagenius

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.

 

 

      Dean offered an amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Solberg raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills that the Dean amendment was not in order.  Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled the point of order well taken and the Dean amendment out of order.

 

 

      Speaker pro tempore Thissen called Sertich to the Chair.

 

 

Westrom moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 20, line 18, delete everything after "effective" and insert "January 1, 2014."


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11280


 

Page 20, delete line 19

 

Page 21, line 6, delete everything after "effective" and insert "January 1, 2014."

 

Page 21, delete line 7

 

Page 63, after line 3, insert:

 

"Sec. 64.  INSTRUCTION TO REVISOR. 

 

The revisor of statutes, when engrossing this amendment, shall make all necessary changes to section effective dates and repealers of provisions related to general assistance medical care, to conform with the January 1, 2014, effective date specified in this amendment for the expansion of medical assistance to include adults without children."

 

Page 66, after line 34, insert:

 

"Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.9657, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1.  Nursing home license surcharge.  (a) Effective July 1, 1993, each non-state-operated nursing home licensed under chapter 144A shall pay to the commissioner an annual surcharge according to the schedule in subdivision 4.  The surcharge shall be calculated as $620 per licensed bed.  If the number of licensed beds is reduced, the surcharge shall be based on the number of remaining licensed beds the second month following the receipt of timely notice by the commissioner of human services that beds have been delicensed.  The nursing home must notify the commissioner of health in writing when beds are delicensed.  The commissioner of health must notify the commissioner of human services within ten working days after receiving written notification.  If the notification is received by the commissioner of human services by the 15th of the month, the invoice for the second following month must be reduced to recognize the delicensing of beds.  Beds on layaway status continue to be subject to the surcharge.  The commissioner of human services must acknowledge a medical care surcharge appeal within 30 days of receipt of the written appeal from the provider.

 

(b) Effective July 1, 1994, the surcharge in paragraph (a) shall be increased to $625.

 

(c) Effective August 15, 2002, the surcharge under paragraph (b) shall be increased to $990.

 

(d) Effective July 15, 2003, the surcharge under paragraph (c) shall be increased to $2,815.

 

(e) The commissioner may reduce, and may subsequently restore, the surcharge under paragraph (d) based on the commissioner's determination of a permissible surcharge.

 

(f) Between April 1, 2002, and August 15, 2004, a facility governed by this subdivision may elect to assume full participation in the medical assistance program by agreeing to comply with all of the requirements of the medical assistance program, including the rate equalization law in section 256B.48, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), and all other requirements established in law or rule, and to begin intake of new medical assistance recipients.  Rates will be determined under Minnesota Rules, parts 9549.0010 to 9549.0080.  Notwithstanding section 256B.431, subdivision 27, paragraph (i), rate calculations will be subject to limits as prescribed in rule and law.  Other than the adjustments in sections 256B.431, subdivisions 30 and 32; 256B.437, subdivision 3, paragraph (b), Minnesota Rules, part 9549.0057, and any other applicable legislation enacted prior to the finalization of rates, facilities assuming full participation in medical assistance under this paragraph are not eligible for any rate adjustments until the July 1 following their settle-up period.  


Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11281


 

(g) Effective July 1, 2010, the commissioner shall adjust the surcharge calculation under this subdivision by multiplying the per bed surcharge amount by the average occupancy for the nursing home for the most recent month for which occupancy information is available."

 

Page 193, delete section 17

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Westrom amendment and the roll was called.  There were 49 yeas and 83 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean