Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11549

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

 

EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010

 

_____________________

 

NINETY-EIGHTH DAY

 

Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, May 6, 2010

 

 

      The House of Representatives convened at 12:00 noon and was called to order by Paul Thissen, Speaker pro tempore.

 

      Prayer was offered by the Reverend Duane V. Sarazin, River Hills United Methodist Church, Burnsville, Minnesota.

 

      The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

 

      The roll was called and the following members were present:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers


 

      A quorum was present.

 

      Emmer was excused

 

      Lillie and Slawik were excused until 2:10 p.m.  Kelliher and Mariani were excused until 3:00 p.m.

 

      The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day.  Holberg moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.  The motion prevailed.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11550

REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK

 

                S. F. No. 2918 and H. F. No. 3281, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.

 

SUSPENSION OF RULES

 

      Murphy, M., moved that the rules be so far suspended that S. F. No. 2918 be substituted for H. F. No. 3281 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS

 

 

MOTION TO TAKE FROM THE TABLE

 

      Kohls moved that H. F. No. 2323, Chapter No. 179, vetoed by the Governor on May 21, 2009 and returned to the House and laid on the table pursuant to Joint Rule 3.02(c), be now taken from the table.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Kohls motion and the roll was called.  There were 46 yeas and 83 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

Magnus

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler


 

 

      The motion did not prevail.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11551

REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS

 

 

Pelowski from the Committee on State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections to which was referred:

 

H. F. No. 2227, A bill for an act relating to local government; reestablishing the Board of Innovation; imposing powers and duties on the board; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 3.971, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 465.

 

Reported the same back with the following amendments:

 

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

 

"ARTICLE 1

 

STRATEGIC PLAN

 

Section 1.  STRATEGIC PLAN REPORT. 

 

By January 15, 2011, the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council shall report to the governor and the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over state government policy and finance with a strategic plan containing findings and recommendations to improve state and local government delivery of public services.  The strategic plan must specify:

 

(1) how to enhance the public involvement and input as the public uses state and local government services and public schools;

 

(2) how technology can be leveraged to reduce costs and enhance quality;

 

(3) how service innovation will increase value or results per dollar spent; and

 

(4) the design for a platform that will facilitate high-quality innovation and evaluate state and local government structural redesign in the future.

 

The strategic plan shall also provide a process to review and modify recommendations at regular intervals in the future based on specific results measured at regular intervals.

 

The strategic plan shall also include any proposed legislation necessary to implement the council's recommendations.

 

ARTICLE 2

 

MINNESOTA INNOVATION AND RESEARCH COUNCIL

 

Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 3.971, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 9.  Recommendations to the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council.  The legislative auditor may make recommendations to the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council established under section 465.7902 that will assist the council in accomplishing its duties.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11552

Sec. 2.  [465.7901] DEFINITIONS. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Agency.  "Agency" means a department, agency, board, or other instrumentality of state government that has jurisdiction over an administrative rule or law from which a waiver is sought under section 465.7903.  If no specific agency has jurisdiction over such a law, agency refers to the attorney general.

 

Subd. 2.  Council.  "Council" means the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council established by section 465.7902.

 

Subd. 3.  Local government unit.  "Local government unit" means a county, home rule charter or statutory city, school district, town, or special taxing district.

 

Subd. 4.  Metropolitan agency.  "Metropolitan agency" has the meaning given in section 473.121, subdivision 5a.

 

Subd. 5.  Metropolitan area.  "Metropolitan area" has the meaning given in section 473.121, subdivision 2.

 

Subd. 6.  Metropolitan Council.  "Metropolitan Council" means the Metropolitan Council established by section 473.123.

 

Subd. 7.  Scope.  As used in sections 465.7901 to 465.7907 and 465.805 to 465.808, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.

 

Sec. 3.  [465.7902] MINNESOTA INNOVATION AND RESEARCH COUNCIL. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Membership.  The Minnesota Innovation and Research Council consists of 15 members, appointed as follows:

 

(1) two members of the senate, appointed by the Subcommittee on Committees of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration;

 

(2) two members of the house of representatives, appointed by the speaker of the house;

 

(3) the commissioner of management and budget;

 

(4) the commissioner of administration;

 

(5) the state chief information officer;

 

(6) an administrative law judge appointed by the chief administrative law judge;

 

(7) the state auditor;

 

(8) two members with a background in academic research concerning system redesign and delivery, including one member appointed by the chancellor of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and one member appointed by the president of the University of Minnesota;

 

(9) one member with experience in the leadership of nonprofit organizations, appointed by the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits;

 

(10) one member with experience in foundation leadership appointed by the Minnesota Council on Foundations;


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11553

(11) one member with experience as a leader of a for-profit corporation, appointed by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce; and

 

(12) one member representing public employees appointed by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

 

All members must have experience or interest in the work of system redesign or public sector innovation.  The legislative members serve as nonvoting members.  Only members designated in clauses (3) to (7) may vote on proposed rule or law waivers under section 465.7903.  A commissioner serving on the council may designate an employee from the commissioner's agency to serve as the commissioner's designee.  A person registered as a lobbyist under chapter 10A may not be a member of the council.

 

Subd. 2.  Duties of council.  The council shall:

 

(1) accept applications from local government units and nonprofit organizations for waivers of administrative rules and temporary, limited exemptions from enforcement of procedural requirements in state law as provided in section 465.7903, and determine whether to approve, modify, or reject the application;

 

(2) accept applications for grants to local government units and related organizations proposing to design models or plans for innovative service delivery and management as provided in section 465.7905, and determine whether to approve, modify, or reject the application;

 

(3) accept applications from eligible local government units for service-sharing grants as provided in section 465.7905, and determine whether to approve, modify, or reject the application;

 

(4) make recommendations to the legislature for the authorization of pilot projects for the implementation of innovative service delivery activities that require statutory authorization;

 

(5) make recommendations to the legislature regarding the elimination of state mandates that inhibit local government efficiency, innovation, and cooperation by prescribing specific processes for achieving a desired outcome;

 

(6) investigate and review the role of unfunded state mandates in intergovernmental relations and assess their impact on state and local government objectives and responsibilities;

 

(7) make recommendations to the governor and the legislature regarding:

 

(i) allowing flexibility for local units of government in complying with specific unfunded state mandates for which terms of compliance are unnecessarily rigid or complex;

 

(ii) reconciling any two or more unfunded state mandates that impose contradictory or inconsistent requirements;

 

(iii) terminating unfunded state mandates that are duplicative, obsolete, or lacking in practical utility;

 

(iv) suspending, on a temporary basis, unfunded state mandates that are not vital to public health and safety and that compound the fiscal difficulties of local units of government, including recommendations for initiating the suspensions;

 

(v) consolidating or simplifying unfunded state mandates or the planning or reporting requirements of the mandates, in order to reduce duplication and facilitate compliance by local units of government with those mandates; and


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11554

(vi) establishing common state definitions or standards to be used by local units of government in complying with unfunded state mandates that use different definitions or standards for the same terms or principles;

 

(8) identify relevant unfunded state mandates;

 

(9) facilitate proposals for grants made by eligible applicants; and

 

(10) make recommendations on topics to the Legislative Audit Commission for program evaluations that are likely to result in recommendations that will improve the cost-effective delivery of government services.

 

The duties imposed under clauses (6) to (10) must be performed to the extent possible given existing resources.  Each recommendation under clause (7) must, to the extent practicable, identify the specific unfunded state mandates to which the recommendation applies.  The commissioners or directors of state agencies responsible for the promulgation or enforcement of the unfunded mandates addressed in clauses (5) to (10) shall assist the council in carrying out the council's duties under this section.

 

Subd. 3.  Additional coordinating functions.  The council may also:

 

(1) serve as a clearinghouse for existing ideas and information from community leaders;

 

(2) provide a Web site where interested parties may share information and practices;

 

(3) receive recommendations from the legislative auditor concerning waivers and other initiatives within the council's jurisdiction;

 

(4) conduct research concerning innovation in service delivery and local government efficiency, innovation, and cooperation;

 

(5) facilitate regional dialogue concerning successful innovation and collaboration; and

 

(6) use its best efforts to maximize public involvement in its work, including the use of best practices in social media.

 

Subd. 4.  Staff.  The council shall hire an executive director who serves as the state's chief innovation officer.  The council may hire other staff or consultants as necessary to perform its duties.  The commissioner of administration must provide administrative support services to the council.

 

Subd. 5.  Terms, compensation, and removal.  Members serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority.  Compensation of members is governed by section 15.0575, unless otherwise provided.

 

Sec. 4.  [465.7903] RULE AND LAW WAIVER REQUESTS. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Generally.  (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a local government unit or a nonprofit organization may request the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council to grant a waiver from one or more administrative rules or a temporary, limited exemption from enforcement of state procedural laws governing delivery of services by the local government unit or nonprofit organization.  Two or more local government units may submit a joint application for a waiver or exemption under this section if they propose to cooperate in providing a service or program that is subject to the rule or law.  Before a local unit of government may submit an application to the council, the governing body of the local government unit must approve, in concept, the proposed waiver or exemption at a meeting required to be public under chapter 13D.  A waiver or exemption granted to a nonprofit organization under this section applies to services provided to all of the organization's clients.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11555

(b) A school district that is granted a variance from rules of the commissioner of education under section 122A.163 need not apply to the council for a waiver of those rules under this section.  A school district may not seek a waiver of rules under this section if the commissioner of education has authority to grant a variance to the rules under section 122A.163.  This paragraph does not preclude a school district from being included in a cooperative effort with another local government unit under this section.

 

Subd. 2.  Application.  (a) A local government unit or nonprofit organization requesting a waiver of a rule or exemption from enforcement of a law under this section shall present a written application to the council.  The application must include:

 

(1) identification of the service or program at issue;

 

(2) identification of the administrative rule or the law imposing a procedural requirement with respect to which the waiver or exemption is sought; and

 

(3) a description of the improved service outcome sought, including an explanation of the effect of the waiver or exemption in accomplishing that outcome.

 

(b) A local government unit submitting an application must provide a copy to the exclusive representative certified under section 179A.12 to represent employees who provide the service or program affected by the requested waiver or exemption.

 

Subd. 3.  Review process.  (a) Upon receipt of an application, the council shall commence review of the application, as provided in this subdivision.  The council shall dismiss an application if it finds that the application proposes a waiver of rules or exemption from enforcement of laws that would result in due process violations, violations of federal law or the state or federal constitution, or the loss of services to people who are entitled to them.  If the council does not dismiss an application, the council must publish notice in the State Register before it acts on the application.  The notice must list the name of the local government unit or nonprofit organization requesting the waiver or exemption, the service or program at issue, and the rule or law with respect to which the waiver of exemption is sought.

 

(b) The council shall determine whether a law from which an exemption for enforcement is sought is a procedural law, specifying how a local government unit or nonprofit organization is to achieve an outcome, rather than a substantive law prescribing the outcome or otherwise establishing policy.  For the purposes of this section, "procedural law" does not include a statutory notice requirement.  In making its determination, the council shall consider whether the law specifies such requirements as:

 

(1) who must deliver a service;

 

(2) where the service must be delivered;

 

(3) to whom and in what form reports regarding the service must be made; and

 

(4) how long or how often the service must be made available to a given recipient.

 

(c) If a member of the council also is a commissioner, a commissioner's designee, or the state auditor, or is employed by an agency with jurisdiction over a rule or law affected by an application, the member must not participate in the decision on the particular waiver or exemption.

 

(d) If the application is submitted by a local government unit or a nonprofit organization in the metropolitan area or the unit or nonprofit organization requests a waiver of a rule or temporary, limited exemptions from enforcement of a procedural law over which the Metropolitan Council or a metropolitan agency has jurisdiction, the council shall


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11556

also transmit a copy of the application to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment.  The Metropolitan Council shall report its comments to the council within 60 days of the date the application was transmitted to the Metropolitan Council.  The Metropolitan Council may point out any resources or technical assistance it may be able to provide a local government unit or nonprofit organization submitting a request under this section.

 

(e) Within 15 days after receipt of the application, the council shall transmit a copy of it to the commissioner of each agency having jurisdiction over a rule or law from which a waiver or exemption is sought.  The agency may mail a notice that it has received an application for a waiver or exemption to all persons who have registered with the agency under section 14.14, subdivision 1a, identifying the rule or law from which a waiver or exemption is requested.  If no agency has jurisdiction over the rule or law, the council shall transmit a copy of the application to the attorney general.  The agency shall inform the council of its agreement with or objection to and grounds for objection to the waiver or exemption request within 60 days of the date when the application was transmitted to it.  An agency's failure to respond under this paragraph is considered agreement to the waiver or exemption.  The council shall decide whether to grant a waiver or exemption at its next regularly scheduled meeting following its receipt of an agency's response or the end of the 60-day response period.  If consideration of an application is not concluded at that meeting, the matter may be carried over to the next meeting of the council.  Interested persons may submit written comments to the council on the waiver or exemption request up to the time of its vote on the application.

 

(f) If the exclusive representative of the affected employees of the requesting local government unit objects to the waiver or exemption request, it may inform the council of the objection to and the grounds for the objection to the waiver or exemption request within 60 days of the receipt of the application.

 

Subd. 4.  Hearing.  If the agency or the exclusive representative does not agree with the waiver or exemption request, the council shall set a date for a hearing on the application.  The hearing must be conducted informally at a meeting of the council.  Persons representing the local government unit shall present their request for the waiver or exemption, and a representative from the agency shall explain the agency's objection to the waiver or exemption.  Members of the council may request additional information from either party.  The council may also request, either before or at the hearing, information or comments from representatives of business, labor, local governments, state agencies, consultants, and members of the public.  If necessary, the hearing may be continued at a subsequent council meeting.  A waiver or exemption requires a majority vote of the council members.  The council may modify the terms of the waiver or exemption request in arriving at the agreement required under subdivision 5.

 

Subd. 5.  Conditions of agreements.  (a) If the council grants a request for a waiver or exemption, the council and the entity making the request shall enter into an agreement providing for the delivery of the service or program that is the subject of the application.  The agreement must specify desired outcomes and the means of measurement by which the council will determine whether the outcomes specified in the agreement have been met.  The agreement must specify the duration of the waiver or exemption.  The duration of a waiver from an administrative rule may be for no less than two years and no more than four years, subject to renewal if both parties agree.  An exemption from enforcement of a law terminates ten days after adjournment of the regular legislative session held during the calendar year following the year when the exemption is granted, unless the legislature has acted to extend or make permanent the exemption.

 

(b) If the council grants a waiver or exemption, it must report the waiver or exemption to the legislature, including the chairs of the governmental operations and appropriate policy committees in the house of representatives and senate, and the governor within 30 days.

 

(c) The council may reconsider or renegotiate the agreement if the rule or law affected by the waiver or exemption is amended or repealed during the term of the original agreement.  A waiver of a rule under this section has the effect of a variance granted by an agency under section 14.055.  The recipient of an exemption from enforcement of a procedural requirement in state law under this section is exempt from that law for the duration of the exemption.  The council may require periodic reports from the recipient, or conduct investigations of the service or program.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11557

Subd. 6.  Enforcement.  If the council finds that the recipient of a waiver or an exemption has failed to comply with the terms of the agreement under subdivision 5, it may rescind the agreement.  After an agreement is rescinded, the recipient is subject to the rules and laws covered by the agreement.

 

Subd. 7.  Access to data.  If the recipient of a waiver or an exemption through a cooperative program under this section gains access to data that is classified as not public, the access to and use of the data for the recipient is governed by the same restrictions on access to and use of the data that apply to the unit that collected, created, received, or maintained the data.

 

Sec. 5.  [465.7904] WAIVERS OF STATE RULES; POLICIES. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Application.  A state agency may apply to the council for a waiver from:

 

(1) an administrative rule or policy adopted by the commissioner of management and budget that deals with the state personnel system;

 

(2) an administrative rule or policy of the commissioner of administration that deals with the state procurement system; or

 

(3) a policy of the commissioner of management and budget that deals with the state accounting system.

 

Two or more state agencies may submit a joint application.  A waiver application must identify the rule or policy at issue, and must describe the improved outcome sought through the waiver.

 

Subd. 2.  Review process.  (a) The council shall review all applications submitted under this section.  The council shall dismiss an application if it finds that the application proposes a waiver that would result in due process violations, violations of federal law or the state or federal constitution, or the loss of services to people who are entitled to them.  If a proposed waiver would violate the terms of a collective bargaining agreement effective under chapter 179A, the waiver is not effective without the consent of the exclusive representative that is a party to the agreement.  The council may approve a waiver only if the council determines that if the waiver is granted:  (1) services can be provided in a more efficient or effective manner; and (2) services related to human resources must be provided in a manner consistent with section 43A.01.  In the case of a waiver from a policy of the commissioner of management and budget, the council may approve the waiver only if it determines that services will be provided in a more efficient or effective manner and that state funds will be adequately accounted for and safeguarded in a manner that complies with generally accepted government accounting principles.

 

(b) Within 15 days of receipt of the application, the council shall send a copy of the application to:  (1) the agency whose rule or policy is involved; and (2) all exclusive representatives who represent employees of the agency requesting the waiver.  The agency whose rule or policy is involved may mail a copy of the application to all persons who have registered with the agency under section 14.14, subdivision 1a.

 

(c) The agency whose rule or policy is involved or an exclusive representative shall notify the council of its agreement with or objection to and grounds for objection to the waiver within 60 days of the date when the application was transmitted to the agency or the exclusive representative.  An agency's or exclusive representative's failure to respond under this paragraph is considered agreement to the waiver.

 

(d) If the agency or the exclusive representative objects to the waiver, the council shall schedule a meeting at which the agency requesting the waiver may present its case for the waiver and the objecting party may respond.  The council shall decide whether to grant a waiver at its next regularly scheduled meeting following its receipt of an agency's response, or the end of the 60-day response period, whichever occurs first.  If consideration of an application is not concluded at the meeting, the matter may be carried over to the next meeting of the council.  Interested persons may submit written comments to the council on the waiver request.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11558

(e) If the council grants a request for a waiver, the council and the agency requesting the waiver shall enter into an agreement relating to the outcomes desired as a result of the waiver and the means of measurement to determine whether those outcomes have been achieved with the waiver.  The agreement must specify the duration of the waiver, which must be for at least two years and not more than four years.  If the council determines that an agency that has received a waiver is failing to comply with the terms of the agreement, the council may rescind the agreement.

 

Subd. 3.  Participation.  If a waiver request involves a rule or policy adopted by an official specified in section 465.7902, subdivision 1, clauses (3) to (7), that official may not participate in the evaluation of that waiver request.

 

Sec. 6.  [465.7905] INNOVATION AND REDESIGN GRANTS. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Application.  One or more local units of government, an association of local governments, the Metropolitan Council, a local unit of government acting in conjunction with an organization or a state agency, an organization established by two or more local units of government under a joint powers agreement, or a not-for-profit organization may apply to the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council for a grant to be used to:  (1) develop models for service redesign; or (2) meet the start-up costs of providing shared services or functions.  Agreements solely to make joint purchases do not qualify for grants.  The application must specify a nonstate funding source for 25 percent of the total cost of the proposal.  The application to the council must state what other sources of funding have been considered by the local units of government to implement the project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without assistance from the council.  The council may not award a grant if it determines that the local units of government could complete the project without council assistance or if it determines the applicant has not specified a nonstate funding source for 25 percent of the total cost.  A copy of the application must be provided by the units to the exclusive representatives certified under section 179A.12 to represent employees who provide the service or program affected by the application.

 

Subd. 2.  Proposals.  (a) Proposed models for service redesign may provide options to local governments, neighborhood or community organizations, other not-for-profit organizations, or individuals to redesign service delivery.  In awarding grants under this paragraph, the council must consider whether the proposal:

 

(1) expands consumer choices and opportunities;

 

(2) shifts government toward an expanded role as a purchaser, rather than a provider, of services;

 

(3) reduces administrative costs through statewide or regional contracting, or related administrative efficiencies;

 

(4) reduces administrative costs through the accumulation of multiple related services into a single contract with one provider, or related administrative efficiencies;

 

(5) fosters entrepreneurial leadership in the public sector; and

 

(6) increases value to the taxpayer or results per dollar spent.

 

(b) A proposal for a grant for shared services or functions must include plans to fully integrate a service or function provided by two or more local government units.  The proposal must include how value for the taxpayer or results per dollar spent will be impacted. 

 

Subd. 3.  Requirements.  A copy of the work product for which the grant was provided must be furnished to the council upon completion, and the council may disseminate it to other local units of government or interested groups.  If the council finds that the work was not completed or implemented according to the terms of the grant agreement, it may require the grantee to repay all or a portion of the grant.  The council shall award grants on the basis of each


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11559

qualified applicant's score under the scoring system in section 465.7906.  The amount of a grant under subdivision 2, paragraph (a), may not exceed $250,000.  The amount of a grant under subdivision 2, paragraph (b), may not exceed $100,000.

 

Sec. 7.  [465.7906] SCORING SYSTEM. 

 

In deciding whether to award a grant under section 465.7905, the council shall use the following scoring system:

 

(1) Up to 15 points must be awarded to reflect the extent to which the application demonstrates creative thinking, careful planning, cooperation, involvement of the clients of the affected service, and commitment to persist through challenges.

 

(2) Up to 25 points must be awarded to reflect the extent to which the proposed project is likely to improve the quality of the service, increase value to the taxpayers or results per dollar spent, and to have benefits for other local governments.

 

(3) Up to 15 points must be awarded to reflect the extent to which the application's budget provides sufficient detail, maximizes the use of state funds, documents the need for financial assistance, commits to local financial support, and limits expenditures to essential activities.

 

(4) Up to 15 points must be awarded to reflect the extent to which the application reflects the statutory goal of the grant program.

 

(5) Up to 15 points must be awarded to reflect the merit of the proposed project and the extent to which it warrants the state's financial participation.

 

(6) Up to five points must be awarded to reflect the cost to benefit ratio projected for the proposed project.

 

(7) Up to five points must be awarded to reflect the number of government units participating in the proposal.

 

(8) Up to five points must be awarded to reflect the minimum length of time the application commits to implementation.

 

Sec. 8.  [465.7907] REPAYMENT OF GRANTS. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Repayment procedures.  Without regard to whether a grant recipient offered to repay the grant in its original application, as part of a grant awarded under section 465.7905, the council may require the grant recipient to repay all or part of the grant if the council determines the project funded by the grant resulted in an actual savings for the participating local units of government.  The grant agreement must specify how the savings are to be determined and the period of time over which the savings will be used to calculate a repayment requirement.  The repayment of grant money under this section must not exceed an amount equal to the total savings achieved through the implementation of the project.

 

Subd. 2.  Bonus points.  In addition to the points awarded to competitive grant applications under section 465.7906, the council shall award additional points to any applicant that projects a potential cost savings through the implementation of its project and offers to repay part or all of the grant under the formula in subdivision 1.

 

Subd. 3.  Use of repayment revenue.  All grant money repaid to the council under this section is appropriated to the council for additional grants authorized by section 465.7905.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11560

Sec. 9.  [465.805] POLICY INNOVATION AND RESEARCH. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Research topics.  The council shall periodically select policy innovation topics suitable for review and analysis by a consortium of independent organizations.  Topics may include general or specific functions of state government.  The council shall give primary consideration to areas of concern where a comprehensive review and analysis of available research is likely to yield recommendations for policy changes that will provide significant efficiencies and improvements in the operation of state government and an increase in value to the taxpayer.  Legislators and legislative committees may provide the council with recommendations for topics.  The council shall make the final determination regarding the selection of topics under this section.

 

Subd. 2.  Request for proposal process.  (a) After making the determination of a research topic under subdivision 1, the council shall prepare a request for proposal relating to the topic that specifies:

 

(1) the precise topic and scope of the research required for the report to the commission;

 

(2) the deadlines for the response to the request for proposal and for the subsequent report; and

 

(3) any other restrictions or guidelines required by the commission.

 

The council shall make the request for proposal publicly available and must review responses from any interested party.  A group of individuals or organizations may submit a response.  The council may encourage the development of a collaborative design lab containing a cross-section of researchers and public sector designers from various nonprofits, businesses, foundations, and education institutions to respond to the request for proposal.

 

(b) After the deadline for submission of responses has expired, the council must hold a hearing to consider all submissions.  The council shall consider the following factors in selecting a response to the request for proposal:

 

(1) the experience and training of individuals and organizations who will prepare the report to the commission;

 

(2) the reliability and credibility of individuals and organizations who will prepare the report;

 

(3) the proposed method of research; and

 

(4) the resources available for the preparation of the report.

 

(c) After consideration and hearing of the responses to the request for proposal, the council may:

 

(1) select a submission;

 

(2) revise the original request for proposal and extend the deadline for responses; or

 

(3) terminate the request for proposal process for the selected topic.

 

The chief innovation officer shall periodically communicate with the researchers to make sure they are focused on answering the questions outlined in the request for proposals.

 

Subd. 3.  Reports to council.  The council shall hold a hearing to receive a report prepared under this section and shall ensure that the governor and the relevant committees in the legislature are provided with notice of the report and an opportunity to review the report, including an opportunity for additional hearings.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11561

Sec. 10.  [465.808] RECEIPTS; APPROPRIATION. 

 

(a) The council may charge a fee for the use of services provided by the council's staff.  The receipts from fees charged under this section are deposited in a special revenue account and appropriated to the council for services provided under sections 465.7901 to 465.808.

 

(b) The council may accept gifts and grants.  Money received under this paragraph is deposited in a special revenue account and appropriated to the council for services provided under sections 465.7901 to 465.808.

 

Sec. 11.  [465.809] GUARANTEEING INCREASED VALUE TO THE TAXPAYER. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Report.  The council shall report by January 15 each year to the governor and appropriate committees of the house of representatives and senate on its activities.  The report shall include the amount of the council's net spending, the amount of savings and the increased outcomes to the taxpayer that was identified by the council, and the actual documented savings to state and local governments.  Entities receiving grants or waivers from the council must document and verify savings to the taxpayer from the previous year's budgets.

 

Subd. 2.  Savings and increased value.  The council must make every effort to obtain $3 in savings and show increased value to the taxpayer for each net state dollar spent by the council.

 

Subd. 3.  Innovative practices.  The council shall promote and drive innovative practices and must make annual recommendations to the legislature.  One or all of these recommendations may be in partnership with an individual, foundations, nonprofits, or businesses.  The council may make endorsements of proposals of individuals, foundations, nonprofits, or businesses when making recommendations.  The council must make annual recommendations to:

 

(1) recommend at least $20 in savings and show increased outcomes to the taxpayer for each net state dollar spent by the council.  These savings may be spread out over various budget items;

 

(2) recommend policy changes that will quantifiably improve desired outcome attainment to the taxpayer as compared to dollars spent.  This shall not be limited to efficiency but may also include developing new approaches to achieve desired outcomes;

 

(3) highlight existing innovative practices or partnerships in the state; and

 

(4) recommend innovative models, which may include state and local government structural redesign, from across the country to the legislature; highlight innovative practices from past or contemporary reports; recommend evidence-based service delivery methods for this state; or recommend theory-based working models of approaches to policy.

 

Sec. 12.  APPROPRIATIONS. 

 

$350,000 is appropriated from the general fund for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, to the Minnesota Innovation and Research Council for the following purposes:

 

(1) operation and administration of the council;

 

(2) grants for models for service redesign;

 

(3) grants for shared services and functions;


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11562

(4) policy innovation and research; and

 

(5) the strategic plan report under article 1, section 1.

 

The appropriations in this section are contingent on receiving a dollar-for-dollar match from private sources.

 

Sec. 13.  REPEALER. 

 

Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 6.80, is repealed."

 

Delete the title and insert:

 

"A bill for an act relating to local government; establishing Minnesota Innovation and Research Council; imposing powers and duties of council; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 3.971, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 465; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 6.80."

 

 

With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.

 

      The report was adopted.

 

 

Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:

 

H. F. No. 3051, A bill for an act relating to state lands; modifying method of determining value of acquired stream easements; providing for designation of certain state forest boundaries; modifying state forest acquisition provisions; permitting the exchange of riparian lands within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; establishing a moratorium on public access development for public waters without a public access; adding to and deleting from state parks and state forests; providing for disposition of certain proceeds; requiring designation of certain school trust land as aquatic management area; authorizing and modifying public and private sales, conveyances, and exchanges of certain state land; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 84.0272, subdivision 2; 85.012, subdivision 40; 89.021, by adding a subdivision; 89.032, subdivision 2; 94.342, by adding a subdivision; 97A.141, subdivision 1; Laws 2009, chapter 176, article 4, section 9.

 

Reported the same back with the following amendments:

 

Page 8, delete section 13

 

Page 41, line 31, delete "58" and insert "57"

 

Renumber the sections in sequence

 

Amend the title as follows:

 

Page 1, line 8, delete everything after the semicolon

 

Page 1, line 9, delete "as aquatic management area;"

 

Correct the title numbers accordingly

 

 

With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.

 

      The report was adopted.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11563

Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:

 

H. F. No. 3124, A bill for an act relating to game and fish; modifying aquaculture provisions; modifying provisions for taking, possessing, and transporting wild animals; modifying requirements for fish and wildlife management plans; modifying game and fish license provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 17.4982, subdivision 12, by adding a subdivision; 17.4991, subdivision 3; 17.4994; 84.942, subdivision 1; 84D.03, subdivision 3; 84D.11, subdivision 2a; 97A.015, subdivision 52; 97A.101, subdivision 3; 97A.311, subdivision 5; 97A.331, subdivision 4; 97A.345; 97A.405, subdivision 2; 97A.421, subdivision 4a; 97A.433, by adding a subdivision; 97A.435, subdivisions 1, 4; 97A.502; 97A.535, subdivision 2a; 97A.545, subdivision 5; 97B.015, subdivision 5a; 97B.022, subdivision 2; 97B.031, subdivision 5; 97B.075; 97B.106, subdivision 1; 97B.325; 97B.405; 97B.515, by adding a subdivision; 97B.911; 97B.915; 97B.921; 97B.925; 97C.005, subdivision 3; 97C.087, subdivision 2; 97C.205; 97C.315, subdivision 1; 97C.341; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 84.95, subdivision 2; 97A.445, subdivision 1a; 97B.055, subdivision 3; 97B.811, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 17; 97B; 348; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 84.942, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 97A.435, subdivision 5; 97B.511; 97B.515, subdivision 3; 97B.811, subdivision 4.

 

Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.

 

      The report was adopted.

 

 

SECOND READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

 

      H. F. Nos. 3051 and 3124 were read for the second time.

 

 

SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS

 

 

      S. F. No. 2918 was read for the second time.

 

 

INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

 

      The following House Files were introduced:

 

 

      Drazkowski, Shimanski, Dettmer, Scott, Buesgens and Davids introduced:

 

      H. F. No. 3830, A bill for an act relating to public safety; illegal immigration; requiring law enforcement to enforce federal immigration laws; establishing eligibility criteria for federal and state public benefits; requiring possession of alien identification cards; prohibiting the transporting and smuggling of illegal immigrants; prohibiting illegal immigrants from working or soliciting work in the state; prohibiting the employment of illegal aliens; creating the Minnesota Illegal Immigration Enforcement Team; requiring the attorney general to represent the state against any challenges to this act; amending Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 629.34, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 299P.

 

      The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Public Safety Policy and Oversight.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11564

      Torkelson introduced:

 

      H. F. No. 3831, A bill for an act relating to employment; modifying prevailing hours of labor requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 177.42, subdivision 4.

 

      The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor.

 

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

 

      The following messages were received from the Senate:

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

H. F. No. 653, A bill for an act relating to elections; changing certain municipal precinct and ward boundary procedures and requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 204B.135, subdivisions 1, 3; 204B.14, subdivisions 3, 4; 205.84, subdivisions 1, 2.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said House File is herewith returned to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

H. F. No. 655, A bill for an act relating to elections; requiring an affidavit of candidacy to state the candidate's residence address and telephone number; prohibiting placement of a candidate on the ballot if residency requirements are not met; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 204B.06, subdivision 1.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said House File is herewith returned to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

H. F. No. 2668, A bill for an act relating to landlord and tenant; modifying certain procedures relating to expungement; providing procedures relating to the charging and recovery of various fees; providing certain rights to tenants of foreclosed properties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 484.014, subdivision 3; 504B.111;


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11565

504B.173; 504B.178, subdivision 7; 504B.215, subdivision 4; 504B.271, subdivisions 1, 2; 504B.285, by adding subdivisions; 504B.291, subdivision 1; 504B.365, subdivision 4; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 504B.285, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 504B.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said House File is herewith returned to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

H. F. No. 3327, A bill for an act relating to city and county employees; exempting employees of a city-owned or county-owned hospital from certain reporting requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 471.701.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said House File is herewith returned to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

      S. F. No. 2511.

 

      The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 2511

 

A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing a collaborative governance council; requiring reports; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 6.

 

May 4, 2010

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 2511 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

 

That the House recede from its amendments and that S. F. No. 2511 be further amended as follows:


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11566

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

 

"Section 1.  [6.81] COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE COUNCIL. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Establishment; purpose; membership.  (a) A collaborative governance council is established and shall include major statewide governmental entities and nongovernmental statewide organizations as provided in this subdivision.  The council has nine members, including the state auditor and one member appointed by and serving at the pleasure of each of the following:

 

(1) League of Minnesota Cities;

 

(2) Minnesota Association of Townships;

 

(3) Association of Minnesota Counties;

 

(4) Minnesota School Board Association;

 

(5) American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 5;

 

(6) Education Minnesota;

 

(7) Service Employees International Union; and

 

(8) the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.

 

The appointing authorities under this section shall complete their initial appointments no later than July 1, 2010.

 

(b) The council shall seek input from nonmember organizations whose expertise can help inform the council's work.

 

(c) In conjunction with the state auditor's duties to recommend best practices for delivery of local government services, the state auditor shall serve as chair of the council and shall convene the first meeting by July 31, 2010.  The council must meet at least quarterly and must provide notice of its meetings to the public and to the members of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over state and local government, education policy and finance, and early childhood through grade 12 education policy and finance.  Meetings of the council shall be open to the public.

 

(d) Members do not receive compensation or reimbursement of expenses from the council for service on the council.

 

Subd. 2.  Powers and duties; report.  (a) The council shall develop recommendations to the governor and the legislature designed to increase collaboration in government.  These recommendations may include, but are not limited to, strategies, policies, or other actions focused on the following:

 

(1) the review of statutes, laws, and rules that slow or prevent collaboration efforts;

 

(2) the use of collaboration to improve the delivery of governmental services;

 

(3) the use of technology to connect entities and share information, including broadband access;


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11567

(4) the modernization of financial transactions and their oversight by facilitating credit and debit card transactions, electronic funds, transfers, and electronic data interchange; and

 

(5) the creation of model forms for joint power agreements.

 

(b) By February 1 of each year, the council shall submit its recommendations, including any draft legislation necessary to implement its recommendations, to the governor and to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over state and local government policy and finance and early childhood through grade 12 education policy and finance.

 

Subd. 3.  Expiration.  This section expires June 30, 2015.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective June 1, 2010."

 

 

We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.

 

Senate Conferees:  Ann H. Rest, Claire Robling and Sandy Rummel.

 

House Conferees:  Marsha Swails, John Ward and Carol McFarlane.

 

 

      Swails moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2511 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee.              The motion prevailed.

 

 

      S. F. No. 2511, as amended by Conference, was read for the third time.

 

 

MOTION TO LAY ON THE TABLE

 

      Zellers moved that S. F. No. 2511, as amended by Conference, be laid on the table.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Zellers motion and the roll was called.  There were 44 yeas and 84 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

Magnus

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers



Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11568

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler


 

 

      The motion did not prevail.

 

 

S. F. No. 2511, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing a collaborative governance council; requiring reports; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 6.

 

 

      The bill, as amended by Conference, was placed upon its repassage.

 

      The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 101 yeas and 26 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Magnus

Pelowski

Peppin

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Zellers


 

 

      The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11569

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

      S. F. No. 2846.

 

      The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 2846

 

A bill for an act relating to transportation; modifying provisions governing movement of large vehicles on public streets and highways; making technical changes; repealing certain rules related to motor carriers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169.801, subdivision 5; 169.823, as amended; 169.826, as amended; 169.828, subdivision 1; 169.829; 169.851, subdivision 5; 169.86, subdivisions 1a, 5; 169.862, subdivision 1; 169.863, subdivision 1; 169.864, subdivision 4; 169.871, subdivisions 1, 1a, 1b; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 169.801, subdivision 10; 169.81, subdivision 3; 169.824, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.8261, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.85, subdivision 2; 169.862, subdivision 2; 169.864, subdivision 2; 169.865, subdivision 1; 169.87, subdivision 2; 221.025; 221.031, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 169; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 169.826, subdivision 6; Minnesota Rules, parts 7800.0100, subparts 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14; 7800.0200; 7800.0400; 7800.0800; 7800.0900; 7800.1000; 7800.3200, subpart 2; 7800.3300; 7805.0500; 7805.0900; 7805.1300; 8850.7950; 8850.8000; 8850.8050, subpart 2; 8850.8100; 8850.8250; 8850.8300; 8850.8350; 8850.8800; 8850.8850; 8850.9050, subpart 3; 8855.0410; 8855.0600; 8855.0850; 8920.0100; 8920.0150; 8920.0200; 8920.0300; 8920.0400; 8920.0500; 8920.0600; 8920.0700; 8920.0800; 8920.0900; 8920.1000; 8920.1100; 8920.1200; 8920.1300; 8920.1400; 8920.1500; 8920.1550; 8920.1600; 8920.1700; 8920.1800; 8920.1900; 8920.2000; 8920.2100; 8920.2200; 8920.2300; 8920.2400; 8920.2500; 8920.2600; 8920.2700; 8920.2800; 8920.2900; 8920.3000; 8920.3100; 8920.3200; 8920.3300; 8920.3400; 8920.3500; 8920.3600; 8920.3700; 8920.3800; 8920.3900; 8920.4000; 8920.4100; 8920.4200; 8920.4300; 8920.4400; 8920.4500.

 

May 4, 2010

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 2846 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

 

That the House recede from its amendment and that S. F. No. 2846 be further amended as follows:

 

Page 6, line 7, delete the first "axle" and insert "axles"

 

Page 6, line 9, after "rearmost" insert "axles of any" and delete "groups" and insert "group"


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11570

We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.

 

Senate Conferees:  Rod Skoe, Rick Olseen and Joe Gimse.

 

House Conferees:  Melissa Hortman, Alice Hausman and Mary Liz Holberg.

 

 

Hortman moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2846 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee.

 

 

MOTION TO LAY ON THE TABLE

 

      Kohls moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2846 be laid on the table.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Kohls motion and the roll was called.  There were 42 yeas and 83 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Loon

Mack

Magnus

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler


 

 

      The motion did not prevail.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Hortman motion that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2846 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee.  The motion prevailed.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11571

S. F. No. 2846, A bill for an act relating to transportation; modifying provisions governing movement of large vehicles on public streets and highways; making technical changes; repealing certain rules related to motor carriers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169.801, subdivision 5; 169.823, as amended; 169.826, as amended; 169.828, subdivision 1; 169.829; 169.851, subdivision 5; 169.86, subdivisions 1a, 5; 169.862, subdivision 1; 169.863, subdivision 1; 169.864, subdivision 4; 169.871, subdivisions 1, 1a, 1b; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 169.801, subdivision 10; 169.81, subdivision 3; 169.824, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.8261, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.85, subdivision 2; 169.862, subdivision 2; 169.864, subdivision 2; 169.865, subdivision 1; 169.87, subdivision 2; 221.025; 221.031, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 169; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 169.826, subdivision 6; Minnesota Rules, parts 7800.0100, subparts 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14; 7800.0200; 7800.0400; 7800.0800; 7800.0900; 7800.1000; 7800.3200, subpart 2; 7800.3300; 7805.0500; 7805.0900; 7805.1300; 8850.7950; 8850.8000; 8850.8050, subpart 2; 8850.8100; 8850.8250; 8850.8300; 8850.8350; 8850.8800; 8850.8850; 8850.9050, subpart 3; 8855.0410; 8855.0600; 8855.0850; 8920.0100; 8920.0150; 8920.0200; 8920.0300; 8920.0400; 8920.0500; 8920.0600; 8920.0700; 8920.0800; 8920.0900; 8920.1000; 8920.1100; 8920.1200; 8920.1300; 8920.1400; 8920.1500; 8920.1550; 8920.1600; 8920.1700; 8920.1800; 8920.1900; 8920.2000; 8920.2100; 8920.2200; 8920.2300; 8920.2400; 8920.2500; 8920.2600; 8920.2700; 8920.2800; 8920.2900; 8920.3000; 8920.3100; 8920.3200; 8920.3300; 8920.3400; 8920.3500; 8920.3600; 8920.3700; 8920.3800; 8920.3900; 8920.4000; 8920.4100; 8920.4200; 8920.4300; 8920.4400; 8920.4500.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.

 

      The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 126 yeas and 2 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Buesgens

Dean


 

 

      The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11572

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:

 

      S. F. No. 3128.

 

      The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 3128

 

A bill for an act relating to residential construction; providing for lead poisoning prevention; amending the State Building Code; modifying licensing requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 326B.106, by adding subdivisions; 326B.805, by adding a subdivision.

 

May 4, 2010

 

The Honorable James P. Metzen

President of the Senate

 

The Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 3128 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

 

That the House recede from its amendment and that S. F. No. 3128 be further amended as follows:

 

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

 

"Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.106, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 13.  Lead certification.  When issuing permits in compliance with the State Building Code to a residential building contractor, residential remodeler, manufactured home installer, or residential roofer licensed under section 326B.805, municipalities must verify lead certification qualifications of the licensee required under subdivision 14 for renovations performed on residential property constructed prior to 1978.  Municipalities may charge a surcharge for verification of this certification under section 326B.815, subdivision 2.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective February 1, 2011.

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.106, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 14.  Pre-1978 structures.  A residential building contractor, residential remodeler, manufactured home installer, or residential roofer licensed under section 326B.805 performing renovation as defined by Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, section 745.83, on a residential structure constructed prior to 1978 must be certified in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, section 745.89, unless the property has been determined to meet an exemption under Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, section 745.82.  Before performing the renovations as defined by Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, section 745.83, on a residential structure constructed prior to


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11573

1978, a licensee working on the structure must be able to provide to the commissioner information so that proof of certification can be obtained as required in this subdivision.  The department shall provide on its Web site a link to the United States Environmental Protection Agency Web site for verification of certification of a licensee.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective February 1, 2011.

 

Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.805, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 1a.  Pre-1978 structures.  A licensee performing renovation defined by Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, section 745.83, on a residential structure constructed prior to 1978 must comply with section 326B.106, subdivision 14.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective February 1, 2011."

 

Delete the title and insert:

 

"A bill for an act relating to residential construction; providing for lead poisoning prevention; amending the State Building Code; modifying licensing requirements for firms and contractors performing work on certain structures where lead may be present; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 326B.106, by adding subdivisions; 326B.805, by adding a subdivision."

 

 

We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.

 

Senate Conferees:  Kenneth Kelash, Chris Gerlach and Jim Carlson.

 

House Conferees:  Karen Clark, Jim Davnie and Bob Gunther.

 

 

      Clark moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 3128 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee.

 

 

MOTION TO ADJOURN

 

      Buesgens moved that the House adjourn until 9:00 a.m., Friday, May 7, 2010.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Buesgens motion and the roll was called.  There were 39 yeas and 89 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Westrom

Zellers



Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11574

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, P.

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Magnus

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler


 

 

      The motion did not prevail.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Clark motion that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 3128 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

S. F. No. 3128, A bill for an act relating to residential construction; providing for lead poisoning prevention; amending the State Building Code; modifying licensing requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 326B.106, by adding subdivisions; 326B.805, by adding a subdivision.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.

 

      The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 91 yeas and 40 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Gunther

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler



Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11575

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

Magnus

McFarlane

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.

 

 

Madam Speaker: 

 

      I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested: 

 

      H. F. No. 3106, A bill for an act relating to public safety; amending first-degree driving while impaired crime to include prior felony convictions from other states; modifying implied consent, driving while impaired, and ignition interlock provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.24, subdivision 1; 169A.52, subdivisions 3, 4; 169A.54, subdivisions 2, 5; 169A.55, by adding a subdivision; 169A.60, subdivision 1; 171.09; 171.30, subdivisions 1, 2a, 4; 171.306, as amended; 609.131, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 169A.275, subdivision 7; 169A.54, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.54, subdivision 11; 169A.55, subdivision 1; 171.30, subdivision 2c; 171.305, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

      Bigham moved that the House refuse to concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3106, that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House, and that the House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on the disagreeing votes of the two houses.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

Madam Speaker: 

 

      I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested: 

 

      H. F. No. 2614, A bill for an act relating to state government; licensing; state health care programs; continuing care; children and family services; health reform; Department of Health; public health; health plans; assessing administrative penalties; modifying foreign operating corporation taxes; requiring reports; making supplemental and contingent appropriations and reductions for the Departments of Health and Human Services and other health-related boards and councils; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 62D.08, by adding a subdivision; 62J.07, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 62J.38; 62J.692, subdivision 4; 62Q.19, subdivision 1; 62Q.76, subdivision 1; 62U.05; 119B.025, subdivision 1; 119B.09, subdivision 4; 119B.11, subdivision 1; 144.05, by adding a subdivision; 144.226, subdivision 3; 144.291, subdivision 2; 144.293, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 144.651, subdivision 2; 144.9504, by adding a subdivision; 144A.51, subdivision 5; 144E.37; 214.40, subdivision 7; 245C.27, subdivision 2; 245C.28, subdivision 3; 246B.04, subdivision 2; 254B.01, subdivision 2; 254B.02, subdivisions 1, 5; 254B.03, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 254B.05, subdivision 4; 254B.06, subdivision 2; 254B.09, subdivision 8; 256.01, by adding a subdivision; 256.9657, subdivision 3; 256B.04, subdivision 14;


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11576

256B.055, by adding a subdivision; 256B.056, subdivisions 3, 4; 256B.057, subdivision 9; 256B.0625, subdivisions 8, 8a, 8b, 18a, 22, 31, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0631, subdivisions 1, 3; 256B.0644, as amended; 256B.0754, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0915, subdivision 3b; 256B.19, subdivision 1c; 256B.441, by adding a subdivision; 256B.5012, by adding a subdivision; 256B.69, subdivisions 20, as amended, 27, by adding subdivisions; 256B.692, subdivision 1; 256B.75; 256B.76, subdivisions 2, 4, by adding a subdivision; 256D.03, subdivision 3b; 256D.0515; 256D.425, subdivision 2; 256I.05, by adding a subdivision; 256J.20, subdivision 3; 256J.24, subdivision 10; 256J.37, subdivision 3a; 256J.39, by adding subdivisions; 256L.02, subdivision 3; 256L.03, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04, subdivision 7; 256L.05, by adding a subdivision; 256L.07, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 256L.12, subdivisions 5, 6, 9; 256L.15, subdivision 1; 290.01, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 290.17, subdivision 4; 326B.43, subdivision 2; 626.556, subdivision 10i; 626.557, subdivision 9d; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 62J.495, subdivisions 1a, 3, by adding a subdivision; 157.16, subdivision 3; 245A.11, subdivision 7b; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 246B.06, subdivision 6; 252.025, subdivision 7; 252.27, subdivision 2a; 256.045, subdivision 3; 256.969, subdivision 3a; 256B.056, subdivision 3c; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e; 256B.0653, subdivision 5; 256B.0911, subdivision 1a; 256B.0915, subdivision 3a; 256B.69, subdivisions 5a, 23; 256B.76, subdivision 1; 256B.766; 256D.03, subdivision 3, as amended; 256D.44, subdivision 5; 256J.425, subdivision 3; 256L.03, subdivision 5; 256L.11, subdivision 1; 289A.08, subdivision 3; 290.01, subdivisions 19c, 19d; 327.15, subdivision 3; Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 4, article 8, section 66, as amended; Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 3, section 18; article 5, sections 17; 18; 22; 75, subdivision 1; 78, subdivision 5; article 8, sections 2; 51; 81; article 13, sections 3, subdivisions 1, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 8, as amended; 5, subdivision 8, as amended; Laws 2009, chapter 173, article 1, section 17; Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, sections 12, subdivisions 5, 6, 7, 8; 13, subdivision 1b; 16; 21; article 2, section 2, subdivisions 1, 8; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62A; 62D; 62E; 62J; 62Q; 144; 245; 254B; 256; 256B; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62V; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 254B.02, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 254B.09, subdivisions 4, 5, 7; 256D.03, subdivisions 3a, 3b, 5, 6, 7, 8; 290.01, subdivision 6b; 290.0921, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3; Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26, subdivision 3; Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, sections 12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 18; 19.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

      Huntley moved that the House refuse to concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2614, that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House, and that the House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on the disagreeing votes of the two houses.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

      I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:

 

      S. F. Nos. 2702, 3379 and 2900.

 

Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate

 

 

FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS

 

 

S. F. No. 2702, A bill for an act relating to health; establishing licensure for birth centers; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 62Q.19, subdivision 1; 144.651, subdivision 2; 144A.51, subdivision 5; 256B.0625, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11577

The bill was read for the first time. 

 

Ruud moved that S. F. No. 2702 and H. F. No. 3046, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

S. F. No. 3379, A bill for an act relating to public safety; appropriating money to match federal disaster assistance made available through FEMA Public Assistance Program. 

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

 

S. F. No. 2900, A bill for an act relating to natural resources; modifying aquaculture provisions; modifying disposal restrictions for certain livestock taken by wild animals; modifying provisions for taking, possessing, and transporting wild animals; modifying requirements for fish and wildlife management plans; modifying game and fish provisions; modifying game and fish license requirements and fees for youths; increasing certain fishing license fees; modifying certain requirements for invasive species control; modifying certain administrative accounts; modifying electronic transaction provisions; providing for certain registration exemptions; modifying all-terrain vehicle definitions; modifying all-terrain vehicle operation restrictions; modifying state trails and canoe and boating routes; modifying fees and disposition of certain receipts; modifying certain competitive bidding exemptions; modifying horse trail pass provisions; modifying beaver dam provisions; modifying the Water Law; modifying nongame wildlife check offs; modifying method of determining value of acquired stream easements; providing for certain historic property exemption; modifying adding to and deleting from state parks and state forests; authorizing public and private sales, conveyances, and exchanges of certain state land; providing exemptions from rulemaking and requiring rulemaking; providing criminal penalties; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 17.4982, subdivision 12, by adding a subdivision; 17.4991, subdivision 3; 17.4994; 35.82, subdivision 2; 84.025, subdivision 9; 84.027, subdivision 15; 84.0272, subdivision 2; 84.0856; 84.0857; 84.82, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 84.92, subdivisions 9, 10; 84.922, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 84.925, subdivision 1; 84.942, subdivision 1; 84D.03, subdivision 3; 84D.13, subdivision 3; 85.012, subdivision 40; 85.015, subdivision 14; 85.22, subdivision 5; 85.32, subdivision 1; 85.43; 85.46, as amended; 86B.101; 89.032, subdivision 2; 97A.015, subdivision 52, by adding a subdivision; 97A.055, subdivision 4b; 97A.101, subdivision 3; 97A.145, subdivision 2; 97A.311, subdivision 5; 97A.331, by adding subdivisions; 97A.420, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 6, by adding a subdivision; 97A.421, subdivision 4a, by adding a subdivision; 97A.433, by adding a subdivision; 97A.435, subdivision 1; 97A.445, subdivision 5; 97A.451, subdivision 3; 97A.475, subdivisions 3a, 4, 43, 44; 97A.535, subdivision 2a; 97A.545, subdivision 5; 97B.015; 97B.020; 97B.021, subdivision 1; 97B.022, subdivision 2; 97B.031, subdivision 5; 97B.045, by adding a subdivision; 97B.075; 97B.106, subdivision 1; 97B.211, subdivision 1; 97B.301, subdivisions 3, 6; 97B.325; 97B.405; 97B.515, by adding a subdivision; 97B.601, subdivision 4; 97B.665, subdivision 2; 97B.711, by adding a subdivision; 97B.803; 97C.005, subdivision 3; 97C.087, subdivision 2; 97C.205; 97C.341; 103A.305; 103G.271, subdivision 3; 103G.285, subdivision 5; 103G.301, subdivision 6; 103G.305, subdivision 2; 103G.315, subdivision 11; 103G.515, subdivision 5; 290.431; 290.432; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 84.928, subdivision 1; 84.95, subdivision 2; 85.015, subdivision 13; 86A.09, subdivision 1; 97A.075, subdivision 1; 97A.445, subdivision 1a; 97A.451, subdivision 2; 97A.475, subdivisions 2, 3; 97B.055, subdivision 3; 97C.395, subdivision 1; 103G.201; Laws 2008, chapter 368, article 1, section 34, as amended; Laws 2009, chapter 176, article 4, section 9; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 17; 84D; 85; 97B; 97C; 103G; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 84.02, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 84.942, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 97A.435, subdivision 5; 97A.451, subdivisions 3a, 4; 97A.485, subdivision 12; 97B.022, subdivision 1; 97B.511; 97B.515, subdivision 3; 97B.665, subdivision 1; 97C.346; 103G.295; 103G.650; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 3.3006; 84.02, subdivisions 4a, 6a, 6b; Laws 2009, chapter 172, article 5, section 8.

 

The bill was read for the first time. 

 

Dill moved that S. F. No. 2900 and H. F. No. 3124, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison.  The motion prevailed.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11578

CALENDAR FOR THE DAY

 

 

      S. F. No. 1886 was reported to the House.

 

 

Sterner moved to amend S. F. No. 1886, the second engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 8, delete "A residential building"

 

Page 1, delete line 9

 

Page 1, delete line 10 and insert "A residential contractor providing residential roofing"

 

Page 1, line 12, delete the comma

 

Page 1, lines 13, 15, and 16, delete "roofer" and insert "contractor"

 

Page 1, after line 15, insert: 

 

"For purposes of this section, "residential contractor" means a residential roofer, as defined in section 326B.802, subdivision 14, a residential contractor, as defined in section 326B.802, subdivision 11, and a residential remodeler, as defined in section 326B.802, subdivision 12."

 

Page 1, line 23, delete "residential roofer" and insert "contractor" and after "provide" insert "residential roofing"

 

Page 2, lines 2, 13, and 25, delete "48" and insert "72"

 

Page 2, lines 4, 10, 24, 28, and 35, delete "residential roofer" and insert "contractor"

 

Page 2, line 5, delete "residential"

 

Page 2, line 6, delete "roofer" and insert "contractor"

 

Page 2, line 25, delete "residential roofer's" and insert "contractor's"

 

Page 3, line 1, delete "residential roofer" and insert "contractor" and delete "residential"

 

Page 3, line 2, delete "roofer" and insert "contractor"

 

Page 3, after line 2, insert:

 

"Subd. 4.  Definition.  For the purposes of this section, "contractor" means a residential building contractor who is providing roofing services, a residential remodeler who is providing roofing services, or a residential roofer."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      S. F. No. 1886, A bill for an act relating to commerce; regulating contracts and insurance claims for residential roofing goods and services; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 325E; 326B.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11579

      The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 122 yeas and 9 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Brod

Buesgens

Demmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Hackbarth

Shimanski


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      S. F. No. 2971 was reported to the House.

 

 

      Hilty moved to amend S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as follows:

 

      Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3009, the first engrossment:

 

"Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 16E.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2.  Software sale fund.  (a) Except as provided in paragraphs paragraph (b) and (c), proceeds of the sale or licensing of software products or services by the chief information officer must be credited to the enterprise technology revolving fund.  If a state agency other than the Office of Enterprise Technology has contributed to the development of software sold or licensed under this section, the chief information officer may reimburse the agency by discounting computer services provided to that agency.

 

(b) Proceeds of the sale or licensing of software products or services developed by the Pollution Control Agency, or custom developed by a vendor for the agency, must be credited to the environmental fund.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11580

(c) Proceeds of the sale or licensing of software products or services developed by the Department of Education, or custom developed by a vendor for the agency, to support the achieved savings assessment program, must be appropriated to the commissioner of education and credited to the weatherization program to support weatherization activities.

 

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.241, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2.  Programs.  (a) The commissioner may require public utilities to make investments and expenditures in energy conservation improvements, explicitly setting forth the interest rates, prices, and terms under which the improvements must be offered to the customers.  The required programs must cover no more than a three-year period.  Public utilities shall file conservation improvement plans by June 1, on a schedule determined by order of the commissioner, but at least every three years.  Plans received by a public utility by June 1 must be approved or approved as modified by the commissioner by December 1 of that same year.  The commissioner shall evaluate the program on the basis of cost-effectiveness and the reliability of technologies employed.  The commissioner's order must provide to the extent practicable for a free choice, by consumers participating in the program, of the device, method, material, or project constituting the energy conservation improvement and for a free choice of the seller, installer, or contractor of the energy conservation improvement, provided that the device, method, material, or project seller, installer, or contractor is duly licensed, certified, approved, or qualified, including under the residential conservation services program, where applicable.

 

(b) The commissioner may require a utility to make an energy conservation improvement investment or expenditure whenever the commissioner finds that the improvement will result in energy savings at a total cost to the utility less than the cost to the utility to produce or purchase an equivalent amount of new supply of energy.  The commissioner shall nevertheless ensure that every public utility operate one or more programs under periodic review by the department.

 

(c) Each public utility subject to subdivision 1a may spend and invest annually up to ten percent of the total amount required to be spent and invested on energy conservation improvements under this section by the utility on research and development projects that meet the definition of energy conservation improvement in subdivision 1 and that are funded directly by the public utility.

 

(d) A public utility may not spend for or invest in energy conservation improvements that directly benefit a large energy facility or a large electric customer facility for which the commissioner has issued an exemption pursuant to subdivision 1a, paragraph (b).  The commissioner shall consider and may require a utility to undertake a program suggested by an outside source, including a political subdivision, a nonprofit corporation, or community organization.

 

(e) A utility, a political subdivision, or a nonprofit or community organization that has suggested a program, the attorney general acting on behalf of consumers and small business interests, or a utility customer that has suggested a program and is not represented by the attorney general under section 8.33 may petition the commission to modify or revoke a department decision under this section, and the commission may do so if it determines that the program is not cost-effective, does not adequately address the residential conservation improvement needs of low-income persons, has a long-range negative effect on one or more classes of customers, or is otherwise not in the public interest.  The commission shall reject a petition that, on its face, fails to make a reasonable argument that a program is not in the public interest.

 

(f) The commissioner may order a public utility to include, with the filing of the utility's proposed conservation improvement plan under paragraph (a) annual status report, the results of an independent audit of all or a selection of the utility's conservation improvement programs and expenditures performed by the department or an auditor with experience in the provision of energy conservation and energy efficiency services approved by the commissioner and chosen by the utility.  The audit must specify the energy savings or increased efficiency in the use of energy within the service territory of the utility that is the result of the spending and investments.  The audit must evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the utility's conservation programs.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11581

Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.812, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2.  Pilot projects.  (a) In consultation with appropriate representatives from state agencies, local governments, universities, businesses, and other interested parties, the Department of Commerce shall report back to the legislature by November 1, 2005, and every two years thereafter, with develop a slate of proposed pilot projects that contribute to realizing Minnesota's hydrogen economy goal as set forth in section 216B.8109.  The Department of Commerce must consider the following nonexclusive list of priorities in developing the proposed slate of pilot projects:

 

(1) deploy "bridge" technologies such as hybrid-electric, off-road, and fleet vehicles running on hydrogen or fuels blended with hydrogen;

 

(2) lead to cost-competitive, on-site renewable hydrogen production technologies;

 

(3) demonstrate nonvehicle applications for hydrogen;

 

(4) improve the cost and efficiency of hydrogen from renewable energy sources; and

 

(5) improve the cost and efficiency of hydrogen production using direct solar energy without electricity generation as an intermediate step.

 

(b) For deployment projects that do not involve a demonstration component, individual system components of the technology should, if feasible, meet commercial performance standards and systems modeling must be completed to predict commercial performance, risk, and synergies.  In addition, the proposed pilots should meet as many of the following criteria as possible:

 

(1) advance energy security;

 

(2) capitalize on the state's native resources;

 

(3) result in economically competitive infrastructure being put in place;

 

(4) be located where it will link well with existing and related projects and be accessible to the public, now or in the future;

 

(5) demonstrate multiple, integrated aspects of renewable hydrogen infrastructure;

 

(6) include an explicit public education and awareness component;

 

(7) be scalable to respond to changing circumstances and market demands;

 

(8) draw on firms and expertise within the state where possible;

 

(9) include an assessment of its economic, environmental, and social impact; and

 

(10) serve other needs beyond hydrogen development.

 

Sec. 4.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216C.264, is amended to read:

 

216C.264 COORDINATING RESIDENTIAL WEATHERIZATION PROGRAMS. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Agency designation.  The department is the state agency to apply for, receive, and disburse money made available to the state by federal law for the purpose of weatherizing the residences of low-income persons.  The commissioner must coordinate available federal money with state money appropriated for this purpose.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11582

Subd. 2.  Grants.  The commissioner must make grants of federal and state money to community action agencies and other public or private nonprofit agencies for the purpose of weatherizing the residences of low-income persons.  Grant applications must be submitted in accordance with rules promulgated by the commissioner.

 

Subd. 3.  Benefits of weatherization.  In the case of any grant made to an owner of a rental dwelling unit for weatherization, the commissioner must require that (1) the benefits of weatherization assistance in connection with the dwelling unit accrue primarily to the low-income family that resides in the unit; (2) the rents on the dwelling unit will not be raised because of any increase in value due solely to the weatherization assistance; and (3) no undue or excessive enhancement will occur to the value of the dwelling unit.

 

Subd. 4.  Rules.  The commissioner must promulgate rules that describe procedures for the administration of grants, data to be reported by grant recipients, and compliance with relevant federal regulations.  The commissioner must require that a rental unit weatherized under this section be rented to a household meeting the income limits of the program for 24 of the 36 months after weatherization is complete.  In applying this restriction to multiunit buildings weatherized under this section, the commissioner must require that occupancy continue to reflect the proportion of eligible households in the building at the time of weatherization.

 

Subd. 5.  Grant allocation.  The commissioner must distribute supplementary state grants in a manner consistent with the goal of producing the maximum number of weatherized units.  Supplementary state grants are provided primarily for the payment of additional labor costs for the federal weatherization program, and as an incentive for the increased production of weatherized units.

 

Criteria for the allocation of state grants to local agencies include existing local agency production levels, emergency needs, and the potential for maintaining or increasing acceptable levels of production in the area.

 

An eligible local agency may receive advance funding for 90 days' production, but thereafter must receive grants solely on the basis of program criteria.

 

Subd. 6.  Eligibility criteria.  To the extent allowed by federal regulations, the commissioner must ensure that the same income eligibility criteria apply to both the weatherization program and the energy assistance program.

 

Sec. 5.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216E.18, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Funding; assessment.  The commission shall finance its baseline studies, general environmental studies, development of criteria, inventory preparation, monitoring of conditions placed on site and route permits, and all other work, other than specific site and route designation, from an assessment made quarterly, at least 30 days before the start of each quarter, by the commission against all utilities with annual retail kilowatt-hour sales greater than 4,000,000 kilowatt-hours in the previous calendar year.

 

Each share shall be determined as follows:  (1) the ratio that the annual retail kilowatt-hour sales in the state of each utility bears to the annual total retail kilowatt-hour sales in the state of all these utilities, multiplied by 0.667, plus (2) the ratio that the annual gross revenue from retail kilowatt-hour sales in the state of each utility bears to the annual total gross revenues from retail kilowatt-hour sales in the state of all these utilities, multiplied by 0.333, as determined by the commission.  The assessment shall be credited to the special revenue fund and shall be paid to the state treasury within 30 days after receipt of the bill, which shall constitute notice of said assessment and demand of payment thereof.  The total amount which may be assessed to the several utilities under authority of this subdivision shall not exceed the sum of the annual budget of the commission for carrying out the purposes of this subdivision.  The assessment for the second third quarter of each fiscal year shall be adjusted to compensate for the amount by which actual expenditures by the commission for the preceding fiscal year were more or less than the estimated expenditures previously assessed.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11583

Sec. 6.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.106, subdivision 12, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 12.  Separate metering for electric service.  The standards concerning heat loss, illumination, and climate control adopted pursuant to subdivision 1, shall require that electrical service to individual dwelling units in buildings containing two or more units be separately metered, with individual metering readily accessible to the individual occupants.  The standards authorized by this subdivision shall only apply to buildings constructed after the effective date of the amended standards.  Buildings intended for occupancy primarily by persons who are 62 years of age or older or disabled, supportive housing, or which buildings that contain a majority of units not equipped with complete kitchen facilities, shall be exempt from the provisions of this subdivision.  For purposes of this section, "supportive housing" means housing made available to individuals and families with multiple barriers to obtaining and maintaining housing, including those who are formerly homeless or at risk of homelessness and those who have a mental illness, substance abuse disorder, debilitating disease, or a combination of these conditions.

 

Sec. 7.  REPEALER. 

 

Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 216C.19, subdivisions 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20; and 216C.262, are repealed.

 

Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 216C.19, subdivision 17, is repealed."

 

      Delete the title and insert:

 

      "A bill for an act relating to energy; making technical changes related to utility report filings, hydrogen energy projects, weatherization programs, public utility commission assessments, and utility metering for supporting housing; removing obsolete and redundant language; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 16E.15, subdivision 2; 216B.241, subdivision 2; 216B.812, subdivision 2; 216C.264; 216E.18, subdivision 3; 326B.106, subdivision 12; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 216C.19, subdivisions 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20; 216C.262; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 216C.19, subdivision 17."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Hilty, Faust, Norton and Obermueller moved to amend S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 4, after line 11, insert:

 

"Sec. 4.  [216B.1695] NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; COST RECOVERY. 

 

(a) The commission may not allow any of the following costs attributable to the construction of a nuclear generating plant begun after July 1, 2010, to be recovered from Minnesota ratepayers until the plant begins operating at a monthly load capacity factor of at least 85 percent:

 

(1) planning, design, safety, environmental, or engineering studies undertaken prior to construction; or

 

(2) the costs of obtaining regulatory approval, including permits, licenses and any other approval required prior to construction from federal, state and local authorities.

 

(b) The commission may not allow any of the following costs attributable to the construction of a nuclear generating plant begun after July 1, 2010, to be recovered from Minnesota ratepayers:


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11584

(1) any construction costs exceeding the projected construction cost of the generating plant and any ancillary facility constructed by the utility to temporarily or permanently store nuclear waste generated by the plant, as identified in the utility's certificate of need application submitted under section 216B.243;

 

(2) the costs of insuring the plant against accidents that exceed the cost of insurance for a fossil fuel plant of equivalent capacity; or

 

(3) contributions from the plant to provide and maintain local fire protection and emergency services to the plant in case of an accident.

 

(c) Except for regulatory costs of state agencies, no revenues from taxes or fees imposed by the state of Minnesota may be used to pay for any portion of the preconstruction, construction, maintenance, or operating costs of a nuclear generating plant, or to assume any financial risk associated with an accidental release of radioactivity from the generating plant or an ancillary facility constructed by the utility that owns the generating plant to temporarily or permanently store nuclear waste generated by the plant.

 

Sec. 5.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.243, subdivision 3b, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3b.  Nuclear power plant; new construction prohibited; relicensing.  (a) The commission may not issue a certificate of need for the construction of a new nuclear-powered electric generating plant provided that the certificate of need application contains a separate estimate of preconstruction and construction costs that does not include any of the costs identified in section 216B.1695, paragraphs (a) and (b).

 

(b) Any certificate of need for additional storage of spent nuclear fuel for a facility seeking a license extension shall address the impacts of continued operations over the period for which approval is sought."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      Lesch was excused between the hours of 3:55 p.m. and 6:05 p.m.

 

 

Brod moved to amend the Hilty et al amendment to S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

      Page 1, line 5, delete "not"

 

      Page 1, line 13, delete "not"

 

      Page 1, line 24, after "regulatory" insert "and public safety"

 

      Page 2, line 7, delete "does not include" and insert "includes"

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11585

CALL OF THE HOUSE

 

      On the motion of Gunther and on the demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.  The following members answered to their names:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Urdahl

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

      Morrow moved that further proceedings of the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in the absentees.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

      Zellers was excused between the hours of 4:15 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Brod amendment to the Hilty et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 53 yeas and 78 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Faust

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Juhnke

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Norton

Olin

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dittrich

Eken

Falk

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11586

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Laine

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Obermueller

Otremba

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Peppin moved to amend the Hilty et al amendment to S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

      Page 2, lines 6 to 8, delete the new language

 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Hilty et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 73 yeas and 59 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, P.

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Bunn

Carlson

Davids

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Downey

Eken

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Haws

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Lanning

Lillie

Mack

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Slawik

Solberg

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Urdahl

Ward

Welti


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Brod

Brynaert

Buesgens

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davnie

Dean

Doepke

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Falk

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Hayden

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Howes

Kahn

Kohls

Laine

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Loon

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

McFarlane

McNamara

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Newton

Nornes

Paymar

Peppin

Scott

Simon

Slocum

Smith

Sterner

Torkelson

Wagenius

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11587

CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED

 

      Morrow moved that the call of the House be lifted.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

Koenen, Eken, Lieder, Dill, Olin, Westrom, Otremba, Beard and Juhnke moved to amend S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 6, after line 2, insert:

 

"Sec. 6.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216H.03, is amended to read:

 

216H.03 FAILURE TO ADOPT GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL PLAN. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Definition; new large energy facility.  For the purpose of this section, "new large energy facility" means a large energy facility, as defined in section 216B.2421, subdivision 2, clause (1), that is not in operation as of January 1, 2007, but does not include a facility that (1) uses natural gas as a primary fuel, (2) is designed to provide peaking, intermediate, emergency backup, or contingency services, (3) uses a simple cycle or combined cycle turbine technology, and (4) is capable of achieving full load operations within 45 minutes of startup for a simple cycle facility, or is capable of achieving minimum load operations within 185 minutes of startup for a combined cycle facility.

 

Subd. 2.  Definition; statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions.  For the purpose of this section, "statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions" means the total annual emissions of carbon dioxide from the generation of electricity within the state and all emissions of carbon dioxide from the generation of electricity imported from outside the state and consumed in Minnesota.  Emissions of carbon dioxide associated with transmission and distribution line losses are included in this definition.  Carbon dioxide that is injected into geological formations to prevent its release to the atmosphere in compliance with applicable laws, and emissions of carbon dioxide associated with the combustion of biomass, as defined in section 216B.2411, subdivision 2, paragraph (c), clauses (1) to (4), are not counted as contributing to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions.

 

Subd. 3.  Long-term increased emissions from power plants prohibited.  Unless preempted by federal law, until a comprehensive and enforceable state law or rule pertaining to greenhouse gases that directly limits and substantially reduces, over time, statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions is enacted and in effect, and except as allowed in subdivisions 4 to 7, on and after August 1, 2009, no person shall:

 

(1) construct within the state a new large energy facility that would contribute to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions;. 

 

(2) import or commit to import from outside the state power from a new large energy facility that would contribute to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions; or

 

(3) enter into a new long-term power purchase agreement that would increase statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions.  For purposes of this section, a long-term power purchase agreement means an agreement to purchase 50 megawatts of capacity or more for a term exceeding five years.

 

Subd. 4.  Exception for facilities that offset emissions.  (a) The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply if the project proponent demonstrates to the Public Utilities Commission's satisfaction that it will offset the new contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions with a carbon dioxide reduction project identified in paragraph (b) and in compliance with paragraph (c).


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11588

(b) A project proponent may offset in an amount equal to or greater than the proposed new contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions in either, or a combination of both, of the following ways:

 

(1) by reducing an existing facility's contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions; or

 

(2) by purchasing carbon dioxide allowances from a state or group of states that has a carbon dioxide cap and trade system in place that produces verifiable emissions reductions.

 

(c) The Public Utilities Commission shall not find that a proposed carbon dioxide reduction project identified in paragraph (b) acceptably offsets a new contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions unless the proposed offsets are permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, and would not have otherwise occurred.  This section does not exempt emissions that have been offset under this subdivision and emissions exempted under subdivisions 5 to 7 from a cap and trade system if adopted by the state.

 

Subd. 5.  Exception for new steel production facility.  The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply to increases in statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions from a new steel production project located in a taconite relief area that has filed an application for an air quality permit from the Pollution Control Agency prior to January 1, 2007.

 

Subd. 6.  Exception for iron nugget production facility.  The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply to an iron nugget production facility that began construction prior to January 31, 2007, nor to associated mining activities and beneficiation facilities with a concentrate capacity of up to three million tons annually.  For the purposes of this subdivision, "iron nugget" means a product with at least 90 percent iron content.

 

Subd. 7.  Other exemptions.  The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply to:

 

(1) a new large energy facility under consideration by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to proposals or applications filed with the Public Utilities Commission before April 1, 2007, or to any power purchase agreement related to a facility described in this clause.  The exclusion of pending proposals and applications from the prohibitions in subdivision 3 does not limit the applicability of any other law and is not an expression of legislative intent regarding whether any pending proposal or application should be approved or denied;

 

(2) a contract not subject to commission approval that was entered into prior to April 1, 2007, to purchase power from a new large energy facility that was approved by a comparable authority in another state prior to that date, for which municipal or public power district bonds have been issued, and on which construction has begun; or

 

(3) a new large energy facility or a power purchase agreement between a Minnesota utility and a new large energy facility located outside Minnesota that the Public Utilities Commission has determined is essential to ensure the long-term reliability of Minnesota's electric system, to allow electric service for increased industrial demand, or to avoid placing a substantial financial burden on Minnesota ratepayers.  An order of the commission granting an exemption under this clause is stayed until the June 1 following the next regular or annual session of the legislature that begins after the date of the commission's final order.

 

Subd. 8.  Enforcement.  Whenever the commission or the Department of Commerce determines that any person is violating or about to violate this section, it may refer the matter to the attorney general who shall take appropriate legal action.  This section may be enforced by the attorney general on the same basis as a law listed in section 8.31, subdivision 1, except that the remedies provided by section 8.31, subdivision 3a, do not apply to a violation of this section."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11589

Hackbarth, Seifert, Nornes, Severson, Beard, Urdahl, Peppin, Zellers, Sanders, Westrom and Drazkowski moved to amend S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 6, delete section 7, and insert:

 

"Sec. 7.  REPEALER. 

 

(a) Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 216C.19, subdivisions 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20; 216C.262; 216H.03; and 216H.06, are repealed.

 

(b) Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 216C.19, subdivision 17, is repealed."

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

CALL OF THE HOUSE

 

      On the motion of Hackbarth and on the demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.  The following members answered to their names:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Mullery

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Paymar

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

      Sertich moved that further proceedings of the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in the absentees.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Hackbarth et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11590

Faust

Fritz

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Juhnke

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Lieder

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Marquart

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Olin

Otremba

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dittrich

Falk

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Laine

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Paymar

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Ward

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED

 

      Sertich moved that the call of the House be lifted.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

      Kohls moved that the House recess.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Kohls motion and the roll was called.  There were 45 yeas and 81 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Atkins

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Lanning

Loon

Mack

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Peppin

Rosenthal

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11591

Gardner

Hamilton

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Loeffler

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Wagenius

Ward

Welti

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail.

 

 

Kelly and Drazkowski moved to amend S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 3, after line 15, insert:

 

"Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.1691, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2b.  Modification or delay of standard.  (a) The commission shall modify or delay the implementation of a standard obligation, in whole or in part, if the commission determines it is in the public interest to do so.  The commission, when requested to modify or delay implementation of a standard, must consider:

 

(1) the impact of implementing the standard on its customers' utility costs, including the economic and competitive pressure on the utility's customers;

 

(2) the effects of implementing the standard on the reliability of the electric system;

 

(3) technical advances or technical concerns;

 

(4) delays in acquiring sites or routes due to rejection or delays of necessary siting or other permitting approvals;

 

(5) the availability of suitable sites for the location of eligible energy technology facilities, considering local land use restrictions;

 

(6) delays, cancellations, or nondelivery of necessary equipment for construction or commercial operation of an eligible energy technology facility;

 

(6) (7) transmission constraints preventing delivery of service; and

 

(7) (8) other statutory obligations imposed on the commission or a utility.

 

The commission may modify or delay implementation of a standard obligation under clauses (1) to (3) only if it finds implementation would cause significant rate impact, requires significant measures to address reliability, or raises significant technical issues.  The commission may modify or delay implementation of a standard obligation under clauses (4) to (6) only if it finds that the circumstances described in those clauses were due to circumstances beyond an electric utility's control and make compliance not feasible.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11592

(b) When considering whether to delay or modify implementation of a standard obligation, the commission must give due consideration to a preference for electric generation through use of eligible energy technology and to the achievement of the standards set by this section.

 

(c) An electric utility requesting a modification or delay in the implementation of a standard must file a plan to comply with its standard obligation in the same proceeding that it is requesting the delay.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      Urdahl, Emmer and Westrom offered an amendment to S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Hilty raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the Urdahl et al amendment was not in order.

 

 

CALL OF THE HOUSE

 

      On the motion of Severson and on the demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.  The following members answered to their names:

 


Abeler

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Demmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Eastlund

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Hausman

Haws

Hilty

Holberg

Hornstein

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Loon

Mack

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morrow

Murdock

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Paymar

Peppin

Persell

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher


 

      Morrow moved that further proceedings of the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in the absentees.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

      Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled the Hilty point of order well taken and the Urdahl et al amendment out of order.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11593

CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED

 

      Morrow moved that the call of the House be lifted.  The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

 

 

Westrom moved to amend S. F. No. 2971, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 6, after line 2, insert:

 

"Sec. 6.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216H.03, is amended to read:

 

216H.03 FAILURE TO ADOPT GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL PLAN. 

 

Subdivision 1.  Definition; new large energy facility.  For the purpose of this section, "new large energy facility" means a large energy facility, as defined in section 216B.2421, subdivision 2, clause (1), that is not in operation as of January 1, 2007, but does not include a facility that (1) uses natural gas as a primary fuel, (2) is designed to provide peaking, intermediate, emergency backup, or contingency services, (3) uses a simple cycle or combined cycle turbine technology, and (4) is capable of achieving full load operations within 45 minutes of startup for a simple cycle facility, or is capable of achieving minimum load operations within 185 minutes of startup for a combined cycle facility.

 

Subd. 2.  Definition; statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions.  For the purpose of this section, "statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions" means the total annual emissions of carbon dioxide from the generation of electricity within the state and all emissions of carbon dioxide from the generation of electricity imported from outside the state and consumed in Minnesota.  Emissions of carbon dioxide associated with transmission and distribution line losses are included in this definition.  Carbon dioxide that is injected into geological formations to prevent its release to the atmosphere in compliance with applicable laws, and emissions of carbon dioxide associated with the combustion of biomass, as defined in section 216B.2411, subdivision 2, paragraph (c), clauses (1) to (4), are not counted as contributing to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions.

 

Subd. 3.  Long-term increased emissions from power plants prohibited.  Unless preempted by federal law, until a comprehensive and enforceable state law or rule pertaining to greenhouse gases that directly limits and substantially reduces, over time, statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions is enacted and in effect, and except as allowed in subdivisions 4 to 7, on and after August 1, 2009, no person shall:

 

(1) construct within the state a new large energy facility that would contribute to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions;. 

 

(2) import or commit to import from outside the state power from a new large energy facility that would contribute to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions; or

 

(3) enter into a new long-term power purchase agreement that would increase statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions.  For purposes of this section, a long-term power purchase agreement means an agreement to purchase 50 megawatts of capacity or more for a term exceeding five years.

 

Subd. 4.  Exception for facilities that offset emissions.  (a) The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply if the project proponent demonstrates to the Public Utilities Commission's satisfaction that it will offset the new contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions with a carbon dioxide reduction project identified in paragraph (b) and in compliance with paragraph (c).


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11594

(b) A project proponent may offset in an amount equal to or greater than the proposed new contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions in either, or a combination of both, of the following ways:

 

(1) by reducing an existing facility's contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions; or

 

(2) by purchasing carbon dioxide allowances from a state or group of states that has a carbon dioxide cap and trade system in place that produces verifiable emissions reductions.

 

(c) The Public Utilities Commission shall not find that a proposed carbon dioxide reduction project identified in paragraph (b) acceptably offsets a new contribution to statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions unless the proposed offsets are permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, and would not have otherwise occurred.  This section does not exempt emissions that have been offset under this subdivision and emissions exempted under subdivisions 5 to 7 from a cap and trade system if adopted by the state.

 

Subd. 5.  Exception for new steel production facility.  The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply to increases in statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions from a new steel production project located in a taconite relief area that has filed an application for an air quality permit from the Pollution Control Agency prior to January 1, 2007.

 

Subd. 6.  Exception for iron nugget production facility.  The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply to an iron nugget production facility that began construction prior to January 31, 2007, nor to associated mining activities and beneficiation facilities with a concentrate capacity of up to three million tons annually.  For the purposes of this subdivision, "iron nugget" means a product with at least 90 percent iron content.

 

Subd. 7.  Other exemptions.  The prohibitions prohibition in subdivision 3 do does not apply to:

 

(1) a new large energy facility under consideration by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to proposals or applications filed with the Public Utilities Commission before April 1, 2007, or to any power purchase agreement related to a facility described in this clause.  The exclusion of pending proposals and applications from the prohibitions in subdivision 3 does not limit the applicability of any other law and is not an expression of legislative intent regarding whether any pending proposal or application should be approved or denied;

 

(2) a contract not subject to commission approval that was entered into prior to April 1, 2007, to purchase power from a new large energy facility that was approved by a comparable authority in another state prior to that date, for which municipal or public power district bonds have been issued, and on which construction has begun; or

 

(3) a new large energy facility or a power purchase agreement between a Minnesota utility and a new large energy facility located outside Minnesota that the Public Utilities Commission has determined is essential to ensure the long-term reliability of Minnesota's electric system, to allow electric service for increased industrial demand, or to avoid placing a substantial financial burden on Minnesota ratepayers.  An order of the commission granting an exemption under this clause is stayed until the June 1 following the next regular or annual session of the legislature that begins after the date of the commission's final order.

 

Subd. 8.  Enforcement.  Whenever the commission or the Department of Commerce determines that any person is violating or about to violate this section, it may refer the matter to the attorney general who shall take appropriate legal action.  This section may be enforced by the attorney general on the same basis as a law listed in section 8.31, subdivision 1, except that the remedies provided by section 8.31, subdivision 3a, do not apply to a violation of this section.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective January 1, 2011."


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11595

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Westrom amendment and the roll was called.  There were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Brown

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Fritz

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hackbarth

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Hosch

Howes

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Koenen

Kohls

Lanning

Lieder

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Marquart

McFarlane

McNamara

Murdock

Nornes

Olin

Pelowski

Peppin

Poppe

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Abeler

Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Eken

Falk

Faust

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Laine

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Norton

Obermueller

Otremba

Paymar

Persell

Peterson

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Wagenius

Winkler

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      Hackbarth was excused between the hours of 5:55 p.m. and 8:10 p.m.

 

 

      S. F. No. 2971, A bill for an act relating to energy; making technical changes and modifying provisions related to utility report filings, hydrogen energy projects, weatherization programs, high-voltage transmission lines, public utility commission assessments, and utility metering for supportive housing; removing obsolete and redundant language; authorizing individuals and entities to take certain easements in agricultural land; providing for certain reporting requirements; providing for wind and solar easements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 16E.15, subdivision 2; 117.225; 216B.16, by adding a subdivision; 216B.241, subdivision 2; 216B.812, subdivision 2; 216C.264; 216E.03, subdivision 7; 216E.18, subdivision 3; 326B.106, subdivision 12; 500.221, subdivisions 2, 4;


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11596

Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 117.189; Laws 2008, chapter 296, article 1, section 25; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 216C.19, subdivisions 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20; 216C.262; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 216C.19, subdivision 17.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

      The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 86 yeas and 43 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Cornish

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Hansen

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Loon

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Murdock

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Pelowski

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Scalze

Sertich

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Spk. Kelliher


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Brod

Buesgens

Champion

Clark

Davids

Davnie

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Eastlund

Falk

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Greiling

Gunther

Hamilton

Hausman

Holberg

Hoppe

Hornstein

Hortman

Kiffmeyer

Kohls

Mack

Magnus

Mariani

Mullery

Paymar

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Torkelson

Urdahl

Wagenius

Winkler

Zellers


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      S. F. No. 3080 was reported to the House.

 

 

      Hilty moved to amend S. F. No. 3080, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

      Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3667, the first engrossment:

 

"Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.1692, subdivision 8, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 8.  Sunset.  This section is effective until December 31, 2013 2015, and applies to plans, projects, and riders approved before that date and modifications made to them after that date.


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11597

Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.6851, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Plan for 90 percent reduction required.  A public utility that elects to be regulated under this section must file a mercury emissions-reduction plan that is designed to achieve total mercury reduction at targeted and supplemental units owned by the utility equivalent to a goal of 90 percent reduction of mercury emissions at the utility's targeted units by December 31, 2014 2018.

 

Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.6851, subdivision 5, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 5.  Early action; wet scrubbed units.  (a) The utility electing for regulation under this section shall file an initial plan for mercury emissions reduction at one of its two wet scrubbed units on or before December 31, 2007.  The plan must provide for mercury emissions reduction to be implemented at that unit by December 31, 2010.  If the plan is approved by the commission, and implemented by the utility, the utility may have until July 1, 2011 2015, to file its plans for reduction at its other wet scrubbed unit at the qualifying facility, and may have until December 31, 2014 2018, to implement mercury emissions reduction at that unit.

 

(b) Until the utility files its plans for the other wet scrubbed unit, the utility must submit to the commission and agency, by July 1 each year, beginning in 2011, a report containing the following information:

 

(1) mercury control plans for units subject to this section, including how elements of the plans may affect the performance and cost-effectiveness of emission controls for air pollutants other than mercury;

 

(2) an assessment of the impacts of federal laws regulating various air pollutants emitted by coal-fired power plants that can reasonably be expected to be enacted by 2018 on the utility's units subject to this section, and potential utility responses to those laws, including, but not limited, to: 

 

(i) installing pollution control equipment;

 

(ii) using pollution allowances to achieve regulatory compliance; and

 

(iii) retiring or repowering the plant that is the subject of the filing with cleaner fuels considering the costs of complying with state and federal environmental regulations.

 

For each potential response, the report must include an analysis of the impacts on ratepayers, the utility's financial position, and utility operations, including the impacts on the service life of affected units.

 

(c) The utility shall consult with the agency, the Department of Commerce, and other interested stakeholders to determine which future federal laws to assess under paragraph (b), clause (2), and the scope of the assessment of the impact of those laws.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment.

 

Sec. 4.  Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 216B.6851, subdivision 6, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 6.  Agency review and commission approval.  (a) The agency shall review the utility's plans as provided in section 216B.684.

 

(b) The Public Utilities Commission shall review and evaluate a utility's mercury emissions-reduction plans submitted under this section.  In its review, the commission shall consider the environmental and public health benefits, the agency's determination of technical feasibility, competitiveness of customer rates, and cost-effectiveness of the utility's proposed mercury-control initiatives in light of the Pollution Control Agency's review


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11598

under paragraph (a).  Within 180 days of receiving the agency's report, the commission shall approve a utility's mercury emissions-reduction plan that the commission reasonably expects will come closest to achieving total mercury reductions at targeted and supplemental units owned by the utility equivalent to a goal of 90 percent reduction of mercury emissions at the utility's targeted units by December 31, 2014 2018, in a manner that provides for increased environmental and public health benefits without imposing excessive costs on the utility's customers.  If the commission is unable to approve the utility's 90 percent reduction plan filed under subdivision 3, the commission, in consultation with the Pollution Control Agency, shall order the utility to implement the most stringent mercury-control alternative proposed by the utility under this section that provides for increased environmental and public health benefits without imposing excessive costs on the utility's customers.

 

(c) At each targeted and supplemental unit included in a plan under this section, a utility shall propose to implement mercury emissions-control measures that will result in the greatest reduction of mercury emitted from that unit that is technically feasible without imposing excessive costs."

 

      Delete the title and insert:

 

      "A bill for an act relating to energy; modifying programs for reducing emissions at electric generating plants; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 216B.1692, subdivision 8; 216B.6851, subdivisions 3, 5, 6."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      S. F. No. 3080, A bill for an act relating to energy; modifying programs for reducing emissions at electric generating plants; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 216B.1692, subdivision 8; 216B.685, subdivision 4.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

      The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 117 yeas and 14 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Anzelc

Atkins

Beard

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brod

Brown

Brynaert

Buesgens

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Dill

Dittrich

Doepke

Doty

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Eken

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hamilton

Hansen

Haws

Hilstrom

Hilty

Holberg

Hoppe

Hortman

Hosch

Howes

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kalin

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Knuth

Koenen

Kohls

Laine

Lanning

Lenczewski

Lieder

Lillie

Loon

Mack

Magnus

Mahoney

Marquart

Masin

McFarlane

McNamara

Morgan

Morrow

Murdock

Murphy, M.

Nelson

Newton

Nornes

Norton

Obermueller

Olin

Otremba

Pelowski

Peppin

Persell

Peterson

Poppe

Reinert

Rosenthal

Rukavina

Ruud

Sailer

Sanders

Scalze

Scott

Seifert

Sertich

Severson

Shimanski

Simon

Slawik

Slocum

Smith

Solberg

Sterner

Swails

Thao

Thissen

Tillberry

Torkelson

Urdahl

Ward

Welti

Westrom

Winkler

Zellers

Spk. Kelliher



Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11599

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Davnie

Falk

Greiling

Hausman

Hayden

Hornstein

Kahn

Liebling

Loeffler

Mariani

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Paymar

Wagenius


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      Speaker pro tempore Thissen called Juhnke to the Chair.

 

 

      Kohls was excused between the hours of 6:15 p.m. and 7:15 p.m.

 

 

      H. F. No. 3033 was reported to the House.

 

 

Loon, Westrom and Beard moved to amend H. F. No. 3033, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 3, line 17, before the semicolon, insert "or by an electrical contractor or residential building contractor licensed in this state who has completed any installation training offered by the manufacturer of the solar photovoltaic module to be installed"

 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Anderson, B.; Shimanski; Drazkowski and Kelly moved to amend H. F. No. 3033, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 2, after line 13, insert:

 

"(e) After January 1, 2012, any funds collected under this subdivision for purposes other than payment of renewable energy production incentives, as specified in subdivision 2, are to be refunded to the ratepayers of the utility subject to subdivision 1.

 

(f) This section expires January 1, 2021."

 

Page 2, before line 15, insert:

 

"Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 116C.779, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2.  Renewable energy production incentive.  (a) Until January 1, 2021, $10,900,000 annually must be allocated from available funds in the account to fund renewable energy production incentives.  $9,400,000 of this annual amount is for incentives for electricity generated by wind energy conversion systems that are eligible for the incentives under section 216C.41 or Laws 2005, chapter 40. 

 

(b) The balance of this amount, up to $1,500,000 annually, may be used for production incentives for on-farm biogas recovery facilities and hydroelectric facilities that are eligible for the incentive under section 216C.41 or for production incentives for other renewables, to be provided in the same manner as under section 216C.41. 


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11600

(c) Any portion of the $10,900,000 not expended in any calendar year for the incentive is available for other spending purposes under this section, except that, after January 1, 2012, the unexpended portion of the $10,900,000 must be refunded to the ratepayers of the utility subject to subdivision 1.  This subdivision does not create an obligation to contribute funds to the account.

 

(d) The Department of Commerce shall determine eligibility of projects under section 216C.41 for the purposes of this subdivision.  At least quarterly, the Department of Commerce shall notify the public utility of the name and address of each eligible project owner and the amount due to each project under section 216C.41.  The public utility shall make payments within 15 working days after receipt of notification of payments due.

 

Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 116C.779, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment.  (a) Beginning July 1, 2009, and each July 1 through 2012 2011, $5,000,000 must be allocated from the renewable development account to fund a grant to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment for the purposes described in paragraph (b).  The Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment must set aside at least 15 percent of the funds received annually under the grant for qualified projects conducted at a rural campus or experiment station.  Any set-aside funds not awarded to a rural campus or experiment station at the end of the fiscal year revert back to the Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment for its exclusive use.  This subdivision does not create an obligation to contribute funds to the account. 

 

(b) Activities funded under this grant may include, but are not limited to:

 

(1) environmentally sound production of energy from a renewable energy source, including biomass and agricultural crops;

 

(2) environmentally sound production of hydrogen from biomass and any other renewable energy source for energy storage and energy utilization;

 

(3) development of energy conservation and efficient energy utilization technologies;

 

(4) energy storage technologies; and

 

(5) analysis of policy options to facilitate adoption of technologies that use or produce low-carbon renewable energy.

 

(c) For the purposes of this subdivision:

 

(1) "biomass" means plant and animal material, agricultural and forest residues, mixed municipal solid waste, and sludge from wastewater treatment; and

 

(2) "renewable energy source" means hydro, wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy, and microorganisms used as an energy source.

 

(d) Beginning January 15 of 2010, and each year thereafter, the director of the Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment at the University of Minnesota shall submit a report to the chair and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees with primary jurisdiction over energy finance describing the activities conducted during the previous year funded under this subdivision."


Journal of the House - 98th Day - Thursday, May 6, 2010 - Top of Page 11601

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Anderson, B., et al amendment and the roll was called.  There were 43 yeas and 86 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Abeler

Anderson, B.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, S.

Beard

Brod

Buesgens

Cornish

Davids

Dean

Demmer

Dettmer

Doepke

Downey

Drazkowski

Eastlund

Garofalo

Gottwalt

Gunther

Hamilton

Holberg

Hoppe

Howes

Kath

Kelly

Kiffmeyer

Lanning

Mack

Magnus

McFarlane

McNamara

Nornes

Peppin

Sanders

Scott

Seifert

Severson

Shimanski

Smith

Torkelson

Urdahl

Westrom

Zellers


 

 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Anzelc

Atkins

Benson

Bigham

Bly

Brown

Brynaert

Bunn

Carlson

Champion

Clark

Davnie

Dill

Dittrich

Doty

Eken

Falk

Faust

Fritz

Gardner

Greiling

Hansen

Hausman

Haws

Hayden

Hilstrom

Hilty

Hornstein

Hortman

Hosch

Huntley

Jackson

Johnson

Juhnke

Kahn

Kalin

Knuth

Koenen

Laine

Lenczewski

Lesch

Liebling

Lieder

Lillie

Loeffler

Mahoney

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Morgan

Morrow

Mullery

Murphy, E.

Murphy, M.