STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2009
_____________________
FIFTY-FOURTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, May 14, 2009
The House of Representatives convened at
9:30 a.m. and was called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the
House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Craig
Pederson, Northeast Community Lutheran Church, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Bly was excused until 10:05 a.m. Clark and Hayden were excused until 10:10
a.m. Beard, Jackson, Rosenthal, Slawik
and Sterner were excused until 10:20 a.m.
Mullery was excused until 10:25 a.m.
Paymar was excused until 10:35 a.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. Hoppe
moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the
Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF
CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 79 and
H. F. No. 17, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Sertich moved that the rules be so far suspended
that S. F. No. 79 be substituted for H. F. No. 17
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 82 and
H. F. No. 8, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Simon moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 82 be substituted for
H. F. No. 8 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 763 and
H. F. No. 545, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Champion moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 763 be substituted for
H. F. No. 545 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1284 and
H. F. No. 1511, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Atkins moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1284 be substituted for
H. F. No. 1511 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1369 and
H. F. No. 1565, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Kelly moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1369 be substituted for
H. F. No. 1565 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following communications were
received:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
SAINT PAUL 55155
May 11, 2009
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The State
of Minnesota
Dear
Speaker Kelliher:
Please be advised that I have received,
approved, signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the
following House Files:
H. F. No. 1301, relating to
public safety; providing for public safety, courts, and corrections, including
predatory offenders regarding computer access, electronic solicitation, and
training materials on dangers of predatory offenders; sex offenses; crime
victims; domestic fatality review teams; courts; driver's license reinstatement
diversion pilot program; corrections; study of evidence-based practices for
community supervision; emergency response team; controlled substances;
employment of persons with criminal records; financial crimes; unsafe recalled
toys; peace officer and public safety dispatcher employment; trespass in peace
officer cordoned-off areas; peace officer education; and Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension Information Services; providing for boards, task forces, and
programs; providing for reports; providing for penalties.
H. F. No. 936, relating to
human services; specifying criteria for communities for a lifetime; requiring
the Minnesota Board on Aging to report on communities for a lifetime.
H. F. No. 819, relating to
commerce; prohibiting certain unfair ticket sales.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
ST. PAUL 55155
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President
of the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the
following enrolled Acts of the 2009 Session of the State Legislature have been
received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the
Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution,
Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2009 |
Date Filed 2009 |
926 57 2:40 p.m.
May 11 May
11
431 58 2:41 p.m.
May 11 May
11
1301 59 3:00 p.m.
May 11 May 11
936 60 2:43 p.m.
May 11 May
11
819 61 2:45 p.m.
May 11 May
11
Sincerely,
Mark
Ritchie
Secretary
of State
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
SAINT PAUL 55155
May 12, 2009
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The State of
Minnesota
Dear Speaker
Kelliher:
Please be advised that I have received,
approved, signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the
following House File:
H. F. No. 1056, relating to
construction; requiring prompt payment to construction subcontractors;
regulating progress payments and retainages.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
ST. PAUL 55155
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President of
the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the
following enrolled Acts of the 2009 Session of the State Legislature have been
received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the
Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution,
Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2009 |
Date Filed 2009 |
1539 62 4:52 p.m. May 12 May 12
1910 63 10:13 p.m.
May 12 May
12
1876 64 10:14 p.m.
May 12 May
12
1569 65 4:43 p.m. May 12 May 12
1056 66 4:44 p.m. May 12 May 12
1810 67 10:15 p.m.
May 12 May
12
806 68 4:46 p.m. May 12 May 12
1431 69 4:47 p.m. May 12 May 12
675 70 10:16 p.m.
May 12 May
12
532 71 4:41 p.m. May 12 May 12
457 72 10:17 p.m.
May 12 May
12
1408 73 10:18 p.m.
May 12 May
12
1217 74 10:20 p.m.
May 12 May
12
1476 75 4:50 p.m. May 12 May 12
1425 76 4:51 p.m. May 12 May 12
Sincerely,
Mark
Ritchie
Secretary
of State
SECOND READING OF SENATE
BILLS
S. F. Nos. 79, 82, 763, 1284 and 1369 were
read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION
AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House
Files were introduced:
Laine introduced:
H. F. No. 2387, A
bill for an act relating to human services; authorizing Head Start school
readiness service agreements; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 119B.
The bill was read
for the first time and referred to the Early Childhood Finance and Policy
Division.
Loon; Ruud;
Loeffler; Dittrich; Brod; Demmer; Davids; Anderson, S.; Doepke and Downey
introduced:
H. F. No. 2388, A
bill for an act relating to taxes; individual income; waiving the filing
requirement for minimal tax owed as a result of late adoption of federal
changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 289A.08, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Taxes.
MESSAGES
FROM THE SENATE
The following
messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as
amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is
respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 534, A
bill for an act relating to insurance; authorizing and regulating the issuance
of certificates of insurance; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 60K.46,
by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 60A.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Davids moved that
the House refuse to concur in the Senate amendments to
H. F. No. 534, that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee
of 3 members of the House, and that the House requests that a like committee be
appointed by the Senate to confer on the disagreeing votes of the two
houses. The motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as
amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is
respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 239, A
bill for an act relating to real estate; permitting homeowners to recover
certain damages incurred due to faulty construction; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 327A.05; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 327A.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Gardner moved that
the House concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 239 and
that the bill be repassed as amended by the Senate. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 239, A
bill for an act relating to real estate; permitting homeowners to recover certain
damages incurred due to faulty construction; prohibiting double recovery;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 327A.05; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 327A.
The bill was read
for the third time, as amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 70 yeas and 54 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Peppin
Reinert
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was
repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as
amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is
respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 412, A
bill for an act relating to real estate; adjusting the statute of repose for
homeowner warranty claims; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 541.051,
subdivision 4.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Bunn moved that the
House concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 412 and that
the bill be repassed as amended by the Senate.
The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 412, A
bill for an act relating to real estate; adjusting the statute of repose for
homeowner warranty claims; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 541.051,
subdivision 4.
The bill was read
for the third time, as amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 79 yeas and 46 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Reinert
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was
repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as
amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is
respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 1677, A
bill for an act relating to the safe at home program; specifying applicability;
eliminating certain persons from eligibility; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 5B.01; 5B.02.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Simon moved that
the House concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 1677 and
that the bill be repassed as amended by the Senate. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 1677, A
bill for an act relating to safe at home program; excluding registered sex
offenders from the program; limiting use of protected addresses by landlords
and local government entities; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
5B.02; 5B.07, subdivision 1; 13.805, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 5B.
The bill was read
for the third time, as amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 127 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
The bill was
repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title agreed to.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following
bills to be placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Thursday, May
14, 2009:
S. F. No. 1436;
H. F. Nos. 702, 1341, 1328, 1728, 384, 354, 1744 and 927;
S. F. No. 1012; and H. F. No. 723.
CALENDAR
FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 1331,
as amended by the House on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, was reported to the House.
Brod moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 9, line 7, after "citizen" insert
"living in the precinct"
A roll call was
requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 50 yeas and 80 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Rukavina
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Thao
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk.
Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 17, lines 10 and 11, delete the new language
A roll call was
requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 50 yeas and 84 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Kiffmeyer moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 61, after line 32, insert:
"Sec. 6. [201.35] REPORT TO LEGISLATURE;
UNDELIVERABLE REGISTRATION NOTICES.
By January 15 of each odd-numbered year, the secretary of
state shall report to the chair and ranking minority members of the house of
representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over election issues on
the number of registration notices returned as undeliverable. The report must include the total number of
notices returned statewide, organized by county and by precinct, and indicate
the reasons provided by the postal service for return of the notices. Each county auditor must cooperate with the
secretary of state in providing the data required by this section in a timely
manner."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Gottwalt moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, delete section 2
Page 3, delete sections 3 to 5
Page 6, lines 3 and 5, delete the new language
Page 6, line 10, delete "and"
Page 6, line 11, delete "203B.30 to 203B.35"
Page 10, lines 11 and 12, delete the new language
Page 10, line 13, delete "section 203B.31"
Page 11, delete section 17
Page 11, line 25, delete "or administer early voting"
Page 13, delete lines 18 to 21
Page 13, line 23, delete everything after "accepted"
Page 13, line 24, delete everything through "chapter"
Page 14, line 3, delete "and early voting"
Page 14, line 4, delete "early voting or"
Page 14, line 8, delete "combined" and delete
"who voted in person and voters"
Page 17, delete section 24
Page 18, delete sections 25 to 29
Page 22, lines 6 to 9, delete the new language
Page 22, line 10, delete "(c)"
Page 22, line 15, reinstate the stricken "(c)" and
delete "(d)"
Page 28, delete section 44
Page 30, delete section 48
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was
requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Gottwalt
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 48 yeas and 86 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Brod moved
to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 57,
delete section 2
Page 60,
delete section 4
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 48 yeas and 86 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Faust
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Liebling to the Chair.
Buesgens
moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 18,
line 29, before the period, insert ", except that a voter may not
complete their registration by having another individual vouch for their
residence"
Page 59,
after line 17, insert:
"This
clause does not apply to individuals registering at a polling place during the
early voting period provided in section 203B.31."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 50 yeas and 84 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved
to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 58,
line 22, after the first comma, insert "by presenting photo
identification from a driver's license or identification card issued by a state
or a United States passport,"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 54 yeas and 80 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Peterson
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Buesgens
moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 58,
line 25, after "a" insert "current, valid"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Kiffmeyer
moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 11,
line 27, delete everything after the period, and insert "Party balance,
in the manner provided in section 204B.19, subdivision 5, is required."
Page 11,
delete lines 28 to 31
Page 15,
line 7, strike everything after the period, and insert "Party balance,
in the manner provided in section 204B.19, subdivision 5, is required."
Page 15,
strike lines 8 to 11 and delete the new language
Page 19,
line 20, delete everything after the period, and insert "Party balance,
in the manner provided in section 204B.19, subdivision 5, is required."
Page 19,
lines 21 to 23, delete the new language
Page 20,
line 28, delete everything after the period, and insert "Party balance,
in the manner provided in section 204B.19, subdivision 5, is required."
Page 20,
delete lines 29 and 30
Page 20,
line 31, delete everything before "If"
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Severson was excused between the hours of
11:50 a.m. and 12:45 p.m.
Dean moved
to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 25,
line 26, after the period, insert "Upon certification by the state
canvassing board all ballots not accepted and counted in the canvass report
shall be considered defective and must not be counted in the final vote total
in any further proceeding related to the election result."
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Dean moved
to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 44,
after line 6, insert:
"Sec.
28. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
204C.35, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4. Ballot
handling and security. For
recounts conducted under this section, the secretary of state shall adopt rules
establishing a uniform statewide standard for ballot security and ballot
handling, including proper procedures for manual review of ballots."
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Drazkowski
moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 66,
after line 19, insert:
"Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
204B.27, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Instruction
posters. At least 25 days before
every state election the secretary of state shall prepare and furnish to the
county auditor of each county in which paper ballots are used, voter
instruction posters printed in large type upon cards or heavy paper. The instruction posters must contain the
information needed to enable the voters to cast their paper ballots quickly and
correctly and indicate the types of assistance available for elderly and
disabled voters. Two instruction posters
shall be furnished for each precinct in which paper ballots are used. The instruction posters shall be printed
in English."
Page 67,
line 23, after the first semicolon, insert "204B.27, subdivision 11;"
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 47 yeas and 85 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Otremba
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Shimanski
Smith
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved
to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 61,
delete section 6
Page 62,
delete section 7
Page 63,
delete sections 8, 9, and 10
Page 64,
delete sections 11 and 12
Page 65,
delete section 13
Page 66,
delete sections 14, 15, and 16
Page 67,
delete sections 21 and 22
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 46 yeas and 87 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Kiffmeyer
moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 40,
line 7, delete "or an academic institution"
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Gottwalt
moved to amend S. F. No. 1331, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 13,
line 9, delete everything after the period
Page 13,
delete line 10
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 1331. A bill for an act relating
to elections; moving the state primary from September to June and making
conforming changes; updating certain ballot and voting system requirements;
changing certain election administration provisions; authorizing early voting;
expanding requirements and authorizations for postsecondary institutions to
report resident student information to the secretary of state for voter
registration purposes; changing certain absentee ballot requirements and
provisions; requiring a special election for certain vacancies in nomination;
changing the special election requirements for vacancies in Congressional
offices; requiring an affidavit of candidacy to state the candidate's residence
address and telephone number; changing municipal precinct and ward boundary
requirements for certain cities; imposing additional requirements on polling
place challengers; changing certain caucus and campaign provisions; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 10A.31, subdivision 6; 10A.321; 10A.322,
subdivision 1; 10A.323; 103C.305, subdivisions 1, 3; 135A.17, subdivision 2;
201.016, subdivisions 1a, 2; 201.022, subdivision 1; 201.056; 201.061,
subdivisions 1, 3; 201.071, subdivision 1; 201.091, by adding a subdivision;
201.11; 201.12; 201.13; 202A.14, subdivision 3; 203B.001; 203B.01, by adding a
subdivision; 203B.02, subdivision 3; 203B.03, subdivision 1; 203B.04,
subdivisions 1, 6; 203B.05; 203B.06, subdivisions 3, 5; 203B.07, subdivisions
2, 3; 203B.08, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 203B.081; 203B.085;
203B.11, subdivision 1; 203B.12; 203B.125; 203B.16, subdivision 2; 203B.17,
subdivision 1; 203B.19; 203B.21, subdivision 2; 203B.22; 203B.225, subdivision
1; 203B.227; 203B.23, subdivision 2; 203B.24, subdivision 1; 203B.26; 204B.04,
subdivisions 2, 3; 204B.06, by adding a subdivision; 204B.07, subdivision 1;
204B.09, subdivisions 1, 3; 204B.11, subdivision 2; 204B.13, subdivisions 1, 2,
by adding subdivisions; 204B.135, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 204B.14, subdivisions
2, 3, 4, by adding a subdivision; 204B.16, subdivision 1; 204B.18; 204B.21,
subdivision 1; 204B.22, subdivisions 1, 2; 204B.24; 204B.27, subdivisions 2, 3;
204B.28, subdivision 2; 204B.33; 204B.35, subdivision 4; 204B.44; 204B.45,
subdivision 2; 204B.46; 204C.02; 204C.04, subdivision 1; 204C.06, subdivision
1; 204C.07, subdivisions 3a, 4; 204C.08; 204C.10; 204C.12, subdivision 2;
204C.13, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 6; 204C.17; 204C.19, subdivision 2; 204C.20,
subdivisions 1, 2; 204C.21; 204C.22, subdivisions 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 13; 204C.24,
subdivision 1; 204C.25; 204C.26; 204C.27; 204C.28, subdivision 3; 204C.30, by
adding subdivisions; 204C.33, subdivisions 1, 3; 204C.35, subdivisions 1, 2, by
adding a subdivision; 204C.36, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 204C.37; 204D.03,
subdivisions 1, 3; 204D.04, subdivision 2; 204D.05, subdivision 3; 204D.07;
204D.08; 204D.09, subdivision 2; 204D.10, subdivisions 1, 3; 204D.11,
subdivision 1; 204D.12; 204D.13; 204D.16; 204D.165; 204D.17; 204D.19; 204D.20,
subdivision 1; 204D.25, subdivision 1; 205.065, subdivisions 1, 2; 205.07, by
adding a subdivision; 205.075, subdivision 1; 205.13, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2;
205.16, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 205.17, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5; 205.185,
subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 205.84, subdivisions 1, 2; 205A.03, subdivisions
1, 2; 205A.05, subdivisions 1, 2; 205A.06, subdivision 1a; 205A.07,
subdivisions 2, 3; 205A.08, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 205A.10, subdivisions 2, 3,
by adding a subdivision; 205A.11, subdivision 3; 206.56, subdivision 3; 206.57,
subdivision 6; 206.82, subdivision 2; 206.83; 206.84, subdivision 3; 206.86,
subdivision 6; 206.89, subdivisions 2, 3; 206.90, subdivisions 9, 10; 208.03;
208.04; 211B.045; 211B.11, by adding a subdivision; 211B.20, subdivisions 1, 2;
412.02, subdivision 2a; 414.02, subdivision 4; 414.031, subdivision 6;
414.0325, subdivisions 1, 4; 414.033, subdivision 7; 447.32, subdivision 4;
Laws 2005, chapter 162, section 34, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 202A; 203B; 204B; 204C; 204D; 205; 205A;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 3.22; 201.096; 203B.04, subdivision
5; 203B.10; 203B.11, subdivision 2; 203B.13, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 203B.25;
204B.12, subdivision 2a; 204B.13, subdivisions 4, 5, 6; 204B.22, subdivision 3;
204B.36; 204B.37; 204B.38; 204B.39; 204B.41; 204B.42; 204C.07, subdivision 3;
204C.13, subdivision 4; 204C.20, subdivision 3; 204C.23; 204D.05, subdivisions
1, 2; 204D.10, subdivision 2; 204D.11, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 204D.14,
subdivisions 1, 3; 204D.15, subdivisions 1, 3; 204D.169; 204D.28; 205.17,
subdivision 2; 206.56, subdivision 5; 206.57, subdivision 7; 206.61,
subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5; 206.62; 206.805, subdivision 2; 206.84, subdivisions
1, 6, 7; 206.86, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 206.90, subdivisions 3, 5, 6, 7,
8; 206.91; Minnesota Rules, part 8230.4365, subpart 5.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 87 yeas and 46 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1012, A bill for an act relating
to state government; appropriating money for environment and natural resources.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 104 yeas and 30 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Scott
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Nornes
Olin
Peppin
Rukavina
Sanders
Seifert
Severson
Smith
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 1503 was reported
to the House.
Hosch moved to amend S. F. No. 1503, the
first engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 1709, as introduced:
"ARTICLE 1
CHILD WELFARE TECHNICAL
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260.93, is amended to read:
260.93 INTERSTATE COMPACT
FOR THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN.
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Interstate Compact for the Placement of
Children is to:
A. Provide a process
through which children subject to this compact are placed in safe and suitable
homes in a timely manner.
B. Facilitate ongoing
supervision of a placement, the delivery of services, and communication between
the states.
C. Provide operating
procedures that will ensure that children are placed in safe and suitable homes
in a timely manner.
D. Provide for the
promulgation and enforcement of administrative rules implementing the
provisions of this compact and regulating the covered activities of the member
states.
E. Provide for uniform
data collection and information sharing between member states under this
compact.
F. Promote
coordination between this compact, the Interstate Compact for Juveniles, the
Interstate Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance, and other compacts
affecting the placement of and which provide services to children otherwise
subject to this compact.
G. Provide for a
state's continuing legal jurisdiction and responsibility for placement and care
of a child that it would have had if the placement were intrastate.
H. Provide for the
promulgation of guidelines, in collaboration with Indian tribes, for interstate
cases involving Indian children as is or may be permitted by federal law.
ARTICLE II.
DEFINITIONS
As used in this compact,
A. "Approved
placement" means the public child-placing agency in the receiving state
has determined that the placement is both safe and suitable for the child.
B. "Assessment" means an evaluation of
a prospective placement by a public child-placing agency to determine whether
the placement meets the individualized needs of the child, including but not
limited to the child's safety and stability, health and well-being, and mental,
emotional, and physical development. An
assessment is only applicable to a placement by a public child-placing agency.
C. "Child"
means an individual who has not attained the age of eighteen (18).
D. "Certification"
means to attest, declare, or be sworn to attesting, declaring, or
swearing before a judge or notary public.
E. "Default"
means the failure of a member state to perform the obligations or
responsibilities imposed upon it by this compact, the bylaws or rules of the
Interstate Commission.
F. "Home
study" means an evaluation of a home environment conducted according to
the applicable requirements of the state in which the home is located, and
documents the preparation and the suitability of the placement resource for
placement of a child according to the laws and requirements of the state in
which the home is located.
G. "Indian
tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or
community of Indians recognized as eligible for services provided to Indians by
the Secretary of the Interior because of their status as Indians, including any
Alaskan native village as defined in section 3(c) of the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act at United States Code, title 43, chapter 33, section 1602(c).
H. "Interstate
Commission for the Placement of Children" means the commission that is
created under Article VIII of this compact and which is generally referred to
as the Interstate Commission.
I. "Jurisdiction" means the power and
authority of a court to hear and decide matters.
J. "Legal risk
placement" ("Legal risk adoption") means a placement made
preliminary to an adoption where the prospective adoptive parents acknowledge
in writing that a child can be ordered returned to the sending state or the
birth mother's state of residence, if different from the sending state and a
final decree of adoption shall not be entered in any jurisdiction until all
required consents are obtained or are dispensed with according to applicable
law.
K. "Member
state" means a state that has enacted this compact.
L. "Noncustodial
parent" means a person who, at the time of the commencement of court
proceedings in the sending state, does not have sole legal custody of the child
or has joint legal custody of a child, and who is not the subject of
allegations or findings of child abuse or neglect.
M. "Nonmember
state" means a state which has not enacted this compact.
N. "Notice of residential placement"
means information regarding a placement into a residential facility provided to
the receiving state including, but not limited to the name, date and place of
birth of the child, the identity and address of the parent or legal guardian,
evidence of authority to make the placement, and the name and address of the
facility in which the child will be placed.
Notice of residential placement shall also include information regarding
a discharge and any unauthorized absence from the facility.
O. "Placement"
means the act by a public or private child-placing agency intended to arrange
for the care or custody of a child in another state.
P. "Private
child-placing agency" means any private corporation, agency, foundation,
institution, or charitable organization, or any private person or attorney that
facilitates, causes, or is involved in the placement of a child from one state
to another and that is not an instrumentality of the state or acting under
color of state law.
Q. "Provisional placement" means a
determination made by the public child-placing agency in the receiving state that
the proposed placement is safe and suitable, and, to the extent allowable, the
receiving state has temporarily waived its standards or requirements otherwise
applicable to prospective foster or adoptive parents so as to not delay the
placement. Completion of an assessment
and the receiving state requirements regarding training for prospective foster
or adoptive parents shall not delay an otherwise safe and suitable placement.
R. "Public
child-placing agency" means any government child welfare agency or child
protection agency or a private entity under contract with such an agency,
regardless of whether they act on behalf of a state, county, municipality, or
other governmental unit and which facilitates, causes, or is involved in the
placement of a child from one state to another.
S. "Receiving
state" means the state to which a child is sent, brought, or caused to be
sent or brought.
T. Relative" means
someone who is related to the child as a parent, stepparent, sibling by half or
whole blood or by adoption, grandparent, aunt, uncle, or first cousin or a non-relative
nonrelative with such significant ties to the child that they may be
regarded as relatives as determined by the court in the sending state.
U. "Residential
facility" means a facility providing a level of care that is sufficient to
substitute for parental responsibility or foster care, and is beyond what is
needed for assessment or treatment of an acute condition. For purposes of the compact, residential
facilities do not include institutions primarily educational in character,
hospitals, or other medical facilities.
V. "Rule"
means a written directive, mandate, standard, or principle issued by the
Interstate Commission promulgated pursuant to Article XI of this compact that
is of general applicability and that implements, interprets, or prescribes a
policy or provision of the compact. Rule
has the force and effect of an administrative rule in a member state, and
includes the amendment, repeal, or suspension of an existing rule.
W. "Sending
state" means the state from which the placement of a child is initiated.
X. "Service
member's permanent duty station" means the military installation where an
active duty Armed Services member is currently assigned and is physically
located under competent orders that do not specify the duty as temporary.
Y. "Service
member's state of legal residence" means the state in which the active
duty Armed Services member is considered a resident for tax and voting
purposes.
Z. "State"
means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Marianas Islands, and any other territory of the United States.
AA. "State
court" means a judicial body of a state that is vested by law with
responsibility for adjudicating cases involving abuse, neglect, deprivation,
delinquency, or status offenses of individuals who have not attained the age of
eighteen (18).
BB. "Supervision" means monitoring
provided by the receiving state once a child has been placed in a receiving
state pursuant to this compact.
ARTICLE III.
APPLICABILITY
A. Except as otherwise
provided in Article III, Section B, this compact shall apply to:
1. The interstate
placement of a child subject to ongoing court jurisdiction in the sending
state, due to allegations or findings that the child has been abused,
neglected, or deprived as defined by the laws of the sending state, provided,
however, that the placement of such a child into a residential facility shall
only require notice of residential placement to the receiving state prior to
placement.
2. The interstate
placement of a child adjudicated delinquent or unmanageable based on the laws
of the sending state and subject to ongoing court jurisdiction of the sending
state if:
a. the child is being
placed in a residential facility in another member state and is not covered
under another compact; or
b. the child is being
placed in another member state and the determination of safety and suitability
of the placement and services required is not provided through another compact.
3. The interstate
placement of any child by a public child-placing agency or private
child-placing agency as defined in this compact as a preliminary step to a
possible adoption.
B. The provisions of
this compact shall not apply to:
1. The interstate
placement of a child in a custody proceeding in which a public child-placing
agency is not a party, provided the placement is not intended to effectuate an
adoption.
2. The interstate
placement of a child with a non-relative nonrelative in a
receiving state by a parent with the legal authority to make such a placement
provided, however, that the placement is not intended to effectuate an
adoption.
3. The interstate
placement of a child by one relative with the lawful authority to make such a
placement directly with a relative in a receiving state.
4. The placement of a
child, not subject to Article III, Section A, into a residential facility by
the child's parent.
5. The placement of a
child with a noncustodial parent provided that:
a. The noncustodial
parent proves to the satisfaction of a court in the sending state a substantial
relationship with the child; and
b. The court in the
sending state makes a written finding that placement with the noncustodial
parent is in the best interests of the child; and
c. The court in the
sending state dismisses its jurisdiction over the child's case. in
interstate placements in which the public child-placing agency is a party to
the proceedings.
6. A child entering
the United States from a foreign country for the purpose of adoption or leaving
the United States to go to a foreign country for the purpose of adoption in
that country.
7. Cases in which a
U.S. citizen child living overseas with the child's family, at least one of
whom is in the United States armed services, and who is stationed overseas, is
removed and placed in a state.
8. The sending of a
child by a public child-placing agency or a private child-placing agency for a
visit as defined by the rules of the Interstate Commission.
C. For purposes of
determining the applicability of this compact to the placement of a child with
a family in the armed services, the public child-placing agency or private
child-placing agency may choose the state of the service member's permanent
duty station or the service member's declared legal residence.
D. Nothing in this
compact shall be construed to prohibit the concurrent application of the
provisions of this compact with other applicable interstate compacts including
the Interstate Compact for Juveniles and the Interstate Compact on Adoption and
Medical Assistance. The Interstate
Commission may in cooperation with other interstate compact commissions having
responsibility for the interstate movement, placement, or transfer of children,
promulgate like rules to ensure the coordination of services, timely placement
of children, and the reduction of unnecessary or duplicative administrative or
procedural requirements.
ARTICLE IV.
JURISDICTION
A. Except as provided
in article IV, section G H and article V, section B, paragraphs 2 and
3, concerning private and independent adoptions and in interstate
placements in which the public child-placing agency is not a party to a custody
proceeding, the sending state shall retain jurisdiction over a child with
respect to all matters of custody and disposition of the child which it would
have had if the child had remained in the sending state. Such jurisdiction shall also include the
power to order the return of the child to the sending state.
B. When an issue of
child protection or custody is brought before a court in the receiving state,
such court shall confer with the court of the sending state to determine the
most appropriate forum for adjudication.
C. In cases that are
before courts and subject to this compact, the taking of testimony for hearings
before any judicial officer may occur in person or by telephone; by audio-video
conference; or by other means as approved by the rules of the Interstate
Commission. Judicial officers may
communicate with other judicial officers and persons involved in the interstate
process as may be permitted by their Canons of Judicial Conduct and any rules
promulgated by the Interstate Commission.
C. D. In
accordance with its own laws, the court in the sending state shall have
authority to terminate its jurisdiction if:
1. The child is
reunified with the parent in the receiving state who is the subject of
allegations or findings of abuse or neglect, only with the concurrence of the
public child-placing agency in the receiving state; or
2. The child is
adopted;
3. The child reaches
the age of majority under the laws of the sending state; or
4. The child achieves
legal independence pursuant to the laws of the sending state; or
5. A guardianship is
created by a court in the receiving state with the concurrence of the court in
the sending state; or
6. An Indian tribe has
petitioned for and received jurisdiction from the court in the sending state;
or
7. The public
child-placing agency of the sending state requests termination and has obtained
the concurrence of the public child-placing agency in the receiving state.
D. E. When a sending state court terminates its
jurisdiction, the receiving state child-placing agency shall be notified.
E. F. Nothing in this article shall defeat a claim
of jurisdiction by a receiving state court sufficient to deal with an act of
truancy, delinquency, crime, or behavior involving a child as defined by the
laws of the receiving state committed by the child in the receiving state which
would be a violation of its laws.
F. G. Nothing in this article shall limit the
receiving state's ability to take emergency jurisdiction for the protection of
the child.
G. H. The substantive laws of the state in which an
adoption will be finalized shall solely govern all issues relating to the
adoption of the child and the court in which the adoption proceeding is filed
shall have subject matter jurisdiction regarding all substantive issues
relating to the adoption, except:
1. when the child is a
ward of another court that established jurisdiction over the child prior to the
placement;
2. when the child is in the legal custody of a public agency
in the sending state; or
3. when the court in
the sending state has otherwise appropriately assumed jurisdiction over the
child, prior to the submission of the request for approval of placement.
ARTICLE V. PLACEMENT
EVALUATION
A. Prior to sending,
bringing, or causing a child to be sent or brought into a receiving state, the
public child-placing agency shall provide a written request for assessment to
the receiving state.
B. For placements by a
private child-placing agency, a child may be sent or brought, or caused to be
sent or brought, into a receiving state, upon receipt and immediate review of
the required content in a request for approval of a placement in both the
sending and receiving state's public child-placing agency. The required content to accompany a request
for provisional approval shall include all of the following:
1. A request for
approval identifying the child, birth parents, the prospective adoptive
parents, and the supervising agency, signed by the person requesting approval;
and
2. The appropriate
consents or relinquishments signed by the birthparents in accordance with the
laws of the sending state or, where permitted, the laws of the state where the
adoption will be finalized; and
3. Certification by a
licensed attorney or other authorized agent of a private adoption agency that
the consent or relinquishment is in compliance with the applicable laws of the
sending state, or where permitted the laws of the state where finalization of
the adoption will occur; and
4. A home study; and
5. An acknowledgment of
legal risk signed by the prospective adoptive parents.
C. The sending state
and the receiving state may request additional information or documents prior
to finalization of an approved placement, but they may not delay travel by the
prospective adoptive parents with the child if the required content for approval
has been submitted, received, and reviewed by the public child-placing agency
in both the sending state and the receiving state.
D. Approval from the
public child-placing agency in the receiving state for a provisional or
approved placement is required as provided for in the rules of the Interstate
Commission.
E. The procedures for
making, and the request for an assessment, shall contain all information and be
in such form as provided for in the rules of the Interstate Commission.
F. Upon receipt of a
request from the public child-placing agency of the sending state, the
receiving state shall initiate an assessment of the proposed placement to
determine its safety and suitability. If
the proposed placement is a placement with a relative, the public child-placing
agency of the sending state may request a determination for a provisional
placement.
G. The public
child-placing agency in the receiving state may request from the public
child-placing agency or the private child-placing agency in the sending state,
and shall be entitled to receive supporting or additional information necessary
to complete the assessment.
ARTICLE VI. PLACEMENT
AUTHORITY
A. Except as otherwise
provided in this compact, no child subject to this compact shall be placed into
a receiving state until approval for such placement is obtained.
B. If the public
child-placing agency in the receiving state does not approve the proposed
placement then the child shall not be placed.
The receiving state shall provide written documentation of any such
determination in accordance with the rules promulgated by the Interstate
Commission. Such determination is not
subject to judicial review in the sending state.
C. If the proposed
placement is not approved, any interested party shall have standing to seek an
administrative review of the receiving state's determination.
1. The administrative
review and any further judicial review associated with the determination shall
be conducted in the receiving state pursuant to its applicable Administrative procedures
Procedure Act.
2. If a determination
not to approve the placement of the child in the receiving state is overturned
upon review, the placement shall be deemed approved, provided however that all
administrative or judicial remedies have been exhausted or the time for such
remedies has passed.
ARTICLE VII. PLACING
AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY
A. For the interstate
placement of a child made by a public child-placing agency or state court:
1. The public
child-placing agency in the sending state shall have financial responsibility
for:
a. the ongoing support
and maintenance for the child during the period of the placement, unless
otherwise provided for in the receiving state; and
b. as determined by the
public child-placing agency in the sending state, services for the child beyond
the public services for which the child is eligible in the receiving state.
2. The receiving state
shall only have financial responsibility for:
a. any assessment conducted by the receiving state; and
b. supervision conducted by the receiving state at the level
necessary to support the placement as agreed upon by the public child-placing
agencies of the receiving and sending state.
3. Nothing in this
provision shall prohibit public child-placing agencies in the sending state
from entering into agreements with licensed agencies or persons in the
receiving state to conduct assessments and provide supervision.
B. For the placement of
a child by a private child-placing agency preliminary to a possible adoption,
the private child-placing agency shall be:
1. Legally responsible
for the child during the period of placement as provided for in the law of the
sending state until the finalization of the adoption.
2. Financially
responsible for the child absent a contractual agreement to the contrary.
C. The public
child-placing agency in the receiving state shall provide timely assessments,
as provided for in the rules of the Interstate Commission.
D. The public
child-placing agency in the receiving state shall provide, or arrange for the
provision of, supervision and services for the child, including timely reports,
during the period of the placement.
E. Nothing in this
compact shall be construed as to limit the authority of the public child-placing
agency in the receiving state from contracting with a licensed agency or person
in the receiving state for an assessment or the provision of supervision or
services for the child or otherwise authorizing the provision of supervision or
services by a licensed agency during the period of placement.
F. Each member state
shall provide for coordination among its branches of government concerning the
state's participation in, and compliance with, the compact and Interstate
Commission activities, through the creation of an advisory council or use of an
existing body or board.
G. Each member state
shall establish a central state compact office, which shall be responsible for
state compliance with the compact and the rules of the Interstate Commission.
H. The public
child-placing agency in the sending state shall oversee compliance with the
provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (United States Code, title 25,
chapter 21, section 1901 et seq.) for placements subject to the provisions of
this compact, prior to placement.
I. With the consent of
the Interstate Commission, states may enter into limited agreements that
facilitate the timely assessment and provision of services and supervision of
placements under this compact.
ARTICLE VIII.
INTERSTATE COMMISSION FOR THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN
The member states hereby establish, by way of this compact, a
commission known as the "Interstate Commission for the Placement of
Children." The activities of the Interstate Commission are the formation
of public policy and are a discretionary state function. The Interstate Commission shall:
A. Be a joint
commission of the member states and shall have the responsibilities, powers and
duties set forth herein, and such additional powers as may be conferred upon it
by subsequent concurrent action of the respective legislatures of the member
states.
B. Consist of one
commissioner from each member state who shall be appointed by the executive
head of the state human services administration with ultimate responsibility
for the child welfare program. The
appointed commissioner shall have the legal authority to vote on policy-related
matters governed by this compact binding the state.
1. Each member state
represented at a meeting of the Interstate Commission is entitled to one vote.
2. A majority of the
member states shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, unless
a larger quorum is required by the bylaws of the Interstate Commission.
3. A representative
shall not delegate a vote to another member state.
4. A representative
may delegate voting authority to another person from their state for a
specified meeting.
C. In addition to the
commissioners of each member state, the Interstate Commission shall include
persons who are members of interested organizations as defined in the bylaws or
rules of the Interstate Commission. Such
members shall be ex officio and shall not be entitled to vote on any matter
before the Interstate Commission.
D. Establish an
executive committee which shall have the authority to administer the day-to-day
operations and administration of the Interstate Commission. It shall not have the power to engage in
rulemaking.
ARTICLE IX. POWERS AND
DUTIES OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION
The Interstate Commission shall have the following powers:
A. To promulgate rules
and take all necessary actions to effect the goals, purposes and obligations as
enumerated in this compact.
B. To provide for
dispute resolution among member states.
C. To issue, upon
request of a member state, advisory opinions concerning the meaning or
interpretation of the interstate compact, its bylaws, rules or actions.
D. To enforce
compliance with this compact or the bylaws or rules of the Interstate
Commission pursuant to Article XII.
E. Collect
standardized data concerning the interstate placement of children subject to
this compact as directed through its rules which shall specify the data to be
collected, the means of collection and data exchange and reporting
requirements.
F. To establish and
maintain offices as may be necessary for the transacting of its business.
G. To purchase and
maintain insurance and bonds.
H. To hire or contract
for services of personnel or consultants as necessary to carry out its
functions under the compact and establish personnel qualification policies, and
rates of compensation.
I. To establish and
appoint committees and officers including, but not limited to, an executive
committee as required by Article X.
J. To accept any and
all donations and grants of money, equipment, supplies, materials, and
services, and to receive, utilize, and dispose thereof.
K. To lease, purchase,
accept contributions or donations of, or otherwise to own, hold, improve, or
use any property, real, personal, or mixed.
L. To sell, convey,
mortgage, pledge, lease, exchange, abandon, or otherwise dispose of any
property, real, personal, or mixed.
M. To establish a
budget and make expenditures.
N. To adopt a seal and
bylaws governing the management and operation of the Interstate Commission.
O. To report annually
to the legislatures, governors, the judiciary, and state advisory councils of
the member states concerning the activities of the Interstate Commission during
the preceding year. Such reports shall
also include any recommendations that may have been adopted by the Interstate
Commission.
P. To coordinate and
provide education, training, and public awareness regarding the interstate
movement of children for officials involved in such activity.
Q. To maintain books
and records in accordance with the bylaws of the Interstate Commission.
R. To perform such
functions as may be necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this
compact.
ARTICLE X.
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION
A. Bylaws
1. Within 12 months
after the first Interstate Commission meeting, the Interstate Commission shall
adopt bylaws to govern its conduct as may be necessary or appropriate to carry
out the purposes of the compact.
2. The Interstate
Commission's bylaws and rules shall establish conditions and procedures under
which the Interstate Commission shall make its information and official records
available to the public for inspection or copying. The Interstate Commission may exempt from disclosure
information or official records to the extent they would adversely affect
personal privacy rights or proprietary interests.
B. Meetings
1. The Interstate
Commission shall meet at least once each calendar year. The chairperson may call additional meetings
and, upon the request of a simple majority of the member states shall call
additional meetings.
2. Public notice shall
be given by the Interstate Commission of all meetings and all meetings shall be
open to the public, except as set forth in the rules or as otherwise provided
in the compact. The Interstate
Commission and its committees may close a meeting, or portion thereof, where it
determines by two-thirds vote that an open meeting would be likely to:
a. relate solely to
the Interstate Commission's internal personnel practices and procedures; or
b. disclose matters
specifically exempted from disclosure by federal law; or
c. disclose financial
or commercial information which is privileged, proprietary or confidential in
nature; or
d. involve accusing a
person of a crime, or formally censuring a person; or
e. disclose information
of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy or physically endanger one or more persons; or
f. disclose
investigative records compiled for law enforcement purposes; or
g. specifically relate
to the Interstate Commission's participation in a civil action or other legal
proceeding.
3. For a meeting, or
portion of a meeting, closed pursuant to this provision, the Interstate
Commission's legal counsel or designee shall certify that the meeting may be
closed and shall reference each relevant exemption provision. The Interstate Commission shall keep minutes
which shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed in a meeting and
shall provide a full and accurate summary of actions taken, and the reasons
therefore, including a description of the views expressed and the record of a
roll call vote. All documents considered
in connection with an action shall be identified in such minutes. All minutes and documents of a closed meeting
shall remain under seal, subject to release by a majority vote of the
Interstate Commission or by court order.
4. The bylaws may
provide for meetings of the Interstate Commission to be conducted by
telecommunication or other electronic communication.
C. Officers and Staff
1. The Interstate
Commission may, through its executive committee, appoint or retain a staff
director for such period, upon such terms and conditions and for such
compensation as the Interstate Commission may deem appropriate. The staff director shall serve as secretary
to the Interstate Commission, but shall not have a vote. The staff director may hire and supervise
such other staff as may be authorized by the Interstate Commission.
2. The Interstate
Commission shall elect, from among its members, a chairperson and a vice
chairperson of the executive committee and other necessary officers, each of
whom shall have such authority and duties as may be specified in the bylaws.
D. Qualified Immunity,
Defense and Indemnification
1. The Interstate
Commission's staff director and its employees shall be immune from suit and
liability, either personally or in their official capacity, for a claim for
damage to or loss of property or personal injury or other civil liability
caused or arising out of or relating to an actual or alleged act, error, or
omission that occurred, or that such person had a reasonable basis for
believing occurred within the scope of commission employment, duties, or
responsibilities; provided, that such person shall not be protected from suit
or liability for damage, loss, injury, or liability caused by a criminal act or
the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of such person.
a. The liability of the
Interstate Commission's staff director and employees or Interstate Commission
representatives, acting within the scope of such person's employment or duties
for acts, errors, or omissions occurring within such person's state may not exceed
the limits of liability set forth under the Constitution and laws of that state
for state officials, employees, and agents.
The Interstate Commission is considered to be an instrumentality of the
states for the purposes of any such action.
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to protect such person
from suit or liability for damage, loss, injury, or liability caused by a
criminal act or the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of such
person.
b. The Interstate
Commission shall defend the staff director and its employees and, subject to
the approval of the Attorney General or other appropriate legal counsel of the
member state shall defend the commissioner of a member state in a civil action
seeking to impose liability arising out of an actual or alleged act, error, or
omission that
occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties or responsibilities, or that the defendant had a reasonable
basis for believing occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission employment,
duties, or responsibilities, provided that the actual or alleged act, error, or
omission did not result from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct on
the part of such person.
c. To the extent not
covered by the state involved, member state, or the Interstate Commission, the
representatives or employees of the Interstate Commission shall be held
harmless in the amount of a settlement or judgment, including attorney's fees
and costs, obtained against such persons arising out of an actual or alleged
act, error, or omission that occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties, or responsibilities, or that such persons had a reasonable
basis for believing occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties, or responsibilities, provided that the actual or alleged
act, error, or omission did not result from intentional or willful and wanton
misconduct on the part of such persons.
ARTICLE XI. RULEMAKING
FUNCTIONS OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION
A. The Interstate
Commission shall promulgate and publish rules in order to effectively and
efficiently achieve the purposes of the compact.
B. Rulemaking shall
occur pursuant to the criteria set forth in this article and the bylaws and
rules adopted pursuant thereto. Such
rulemaking shall substantially conform to the principles of the "Model
State Administrative Procedures Act," 1981 Act, Uniform Laws Annotated,
Vol. 15, p.1 (2000), or such other administrative procedure acts as the
Interstate Commission deems appropriate consistent with due process
requirements under the United States Constitution as now or hereafter
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court.
All rules and amendments shall become binding as of the date specified,
as published with the final version of the rule as approved by the Interstate
Commission.
C. When promulgating a
rule, the Interstate Commission shall, at a minimum:
1. Publish the
proposed rule's entire text stating the reason(s) for that proposed rule; and
2. Allow and invite
any and all persons to submit written data, facts, opinions, and arguments,
which information shall be added to the record, and be made publicly available;
and
3. Promulgate a final
rule and its effective date, if appropriate, based on input from state or local
officials, or interested parties.
D. Rules promulgated
by the Interstate Commission shall have the force and effect of administrative
rules and shall be binding in the compacting states to the extent and in the
manner provided for in this compact.
E. Not later than 60
days after a rule is promulgated, an interested person may file a petition in
the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the Federal
District Court where the Interstate Commission's principal office is located
for judicial review of such rule. If the
court finds that the Interstate Commission's action is not supported by
substantial evidence in the rulemaking record, the court shall hold the rule
unlawful and set it aside.
F. If a majority of
the legislatures of the member states rejects a rule, those states may by
enactment of a statute or resolution in the same manner used to adopt the
compact cause that such rule shall have no further force and effect in any
member state.
G. The existing rules governing
the operation of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children superseded
by this act shall be null and void no less than 12, but no more than 24 months
after the first meeting of the Interstate Commission created hereunder, as
determined by the members during the first meeting.
H. Within the first 12
months of operation, the Interstate Commission shall promulgate rules
addressing the following:
1. Transition rules
2. Forms and
procedures
3. Timelines
4. Data collection and
reporting
5. Rulemaking
6. Visitation
7. Progress
reports/supervision
8. Sharing of
information/confidentiality
9. Financing of the
Interstate Commission
10. Mediation,
arbitration, and dispute resolution
11. Education,
training, and technical assistance
12. Enforcement
13. Coordination with
other interstate compacts
I. Upon determination
by a majority of the members of the Interstate Commission that an emergency
exists:
1. The Interstate
Commission may promulgate an emergency rule only if it is required to:
a. Protect the
children covered by this compact from an imminent threat to their health,
safety, and well-being; or
b. Prevent loss of
federal or state funds; or
c. Meet a deadline for
the promulgation of an administrative rule required by federal law.
2. An emergency rule
shall become effective immediately upon adoption, provided that the usual
rulemaking procedures provided hereunder shall be retroactively applied to said
rule as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 90 days after the
effective date of the emergency rule.
3. An emergency rule
shall be promulgated as provided for in the rules of the Interstate Commission.
ARTICLE XII.
OVERSIGHT, DISPUTE RESOLUTION, ENFORCEMENT
A. Oversight
1. The Interstate
Commission shall oversee the administration and operation of the compact.
2. The executive,
legislative, and judicial branches of state government in each member state
shall enforce this compact and the rules of the Interstate Commission and shall
take all actions necessary and appropriate to effectuate the compact's purposes
and intent. The compact and its rules
shall be binding in the compacting states to the extent and in the manner
provided for in this compact.
3. All courts shall
take judicial notice of the compact and the rules in any judicial or
administrative proceeding in a member state pertaining to the subject matter of
this compact.
4. The Interstate
Commission shall be entitled to receive service of process in any action in
which the validity of a compact provision or rule is the issue for which a
judicial determination has been sought and shall have standing to intervene in
any proceedings. Failure to provide
service of process to the Interstate Commission shall render any judgment,
order or other determination, however so captioned or classified, void as to
the Interstate Commission, this compact, its bylaws, or rules of the Interstate
Commission.
B. Dispute Resolution
1. The Interstate
Commission shall attempt, upon the request of a member state, to resolve
disputes which are subject to the compact and which may arise among member
states and between member and nonmember states.
2. The Interstate
Commission shall promulgate a rule providing for both mediation and binding
dispute resolution for disputes among compacting states. The costs of such mediation or dispute
resolution shall be the responsibility of the parties to the dispute.
C. Enforcement
1. If the Interstate
Commission determines that a member state has defaulted in the performance of
its obligations or responsibilities under this compact, its bylaws or rules,
the Interstate Commission may:
a. Provide remedial
training and specific technical assistance; or
b. Provide written
notice to the defaulting state and other member states, of the nature of the
default and the means of curing the default.
The Interstate Commission shall specify the conditions by which the
defaulting state must cure its default; or
c. By majority vote of
the members, initiate against a defaulting member state legal action in the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia or, at the discretion
of the Interstate Commission, in the federal district where the Interstate
Commission has its principal office, to enforce compliance with the provisions
of the compact, its bylaws, or rules.
The relief sought may include both injunctive relief and damages. In the event judicial enforcement is
necessary the prevailing party shall be awarded all costs of such litigation
including reasonable attorney's fees; or
d. Avail itself of any
other remedies available under state law or the regulation of official or
professional conduct.
ARTICLE XIII.
FINANCING OF THE COMMISSION
A. The Interstate
Commission shall pay, or provide for the payment of the reasonable expenses of
its establishment, organization, and ongoing activities.
B. The Interstate
Commission may levy on and collect an annual assessment from each member state
to cover the cost of the operations and activities of the Interstate Commission
and its staff which must be in a total amount sufficient to cover the
Interstate Commission's annual budget as approved by its members each
year. The aggregate annual assessment
amount shall be allocated based upon a formula to be determined by the
Interstate Commission which shall promulgate a rule binding upon all member
states.
C. The Interstate
Commission shall not incur obligations of any kind prior to securing the funds
adequate to meet the same; nor shall the Interstate Commission pledge the
credit of any of the member states, except by and with the authority of the
member state.
D. The Interstate
Commission shall keep accurate accounts of all receipts and disbursements. The receipts and disbursements of the
Interstate Commission shall be subject to the audit and accounting procedures
established under its bylaws. However,
all receipts and disbursements of funds handled by the Interstate Commission
shall be audited yearly by a certified or licensed public accountant and the
report of the audit shall be included in and become part of the annual report
of the Interstate Commission.
ARTICLE XIV. MEMBER
STATES, EFFECTIVE DATE AND AMENDMENT
A. Any state is
eligible to become a member state.
B. The compact shall
become effective and binding upon legislative enactment of the compact into law
by no less than 35 states. The effective
date shall be the later of July 1, 2007 or upon enactment of the compact into
law by the 35th state. Thereafter it
shall become effective and binding as to any other member state upon enactment
of the compact into law by that state.
The executive heads of the state human services administration with
ultimate responsibility for the child welfare program of nonmember states or
their designees shall be invited to participate in the activities of the
Interstate Commission on a non-voting nonvoting basis prior to
adoption of the compact by all states.
C. The Interstate
Commission may propose amendments to the compact for enactment by the member
states. No amendment shall become
effective and binding on the member states unless and until it is enacted into
law by unanimous consent of the member states.
ARTICLE XV. WITHDRAWAL
AND DISSOLUTION
A. Withdrawal
1. Once effective, the
compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon each and every member
state; provided that a member state may withdraw from the compact specifically
repealing the statute which enacted the compact into law.
2. Withdrawal from
this compact shall be by the enactment of a statute repealing the same. The effective date of withdrawal shall be the
effective date of the repeal of the statute.
3. The withdrawing
state shall immediately notify the president of the Interstate Commission in
writing upon the introduction of legislation repealing this compact in the
withdrawing state. The Interstate
Commission shall then notify the other member states of the withdrawing state's
intent to withdraw.
4. The withdrawing
state is responsible for all assessments, obligations, and liabilities incurred
through the effective date of withdrawal.
5. Reinstatement
following withdrawal of a member state shall occur upon the withdrawing state
reenacting the compact or upon such later date as determined by the members of
the Interstate Commission.
B. Dissolution of
Compact
1. This compact shall
dissolve effective upon the date of the withdrawal or default of the member
state which reduces the membership in the compact to one member state.
2. Upon the
dissolution of this compact, the compact becomes null and void and shall be of
no further force or effect, and the business and affairs of the Interstate
Commission shall be concluded and surplus funds shall be distributed in
accordance with the bylaws.
ARTICLE XVI.
SEVERABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION
A. The provisions of
this compact shall be severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, or
provision is deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the compact
shall be enforceable.
B. The provisions of
this compact shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes.
C. Nothing in this
compact shall be construed to prohibit the concurrent applicability of other
interstate compacts to which the states are members.
ARTICLE XVII. BINDING
EFFECT OF COMPACT AND OTHER LAWS
A. Other Laws
1. Nothing herein
prevents the enforcement of any other law of a member state that is not
inconsistent with this compact.
B. Binding Effect of
the Compact
1. All lawful actions
of the Interstate Commission, including all rules and bylaws promulgated by the
Interstate Commission, are binding upon the member states.
2. All agreements
between the Interstate Commission and the member states are binding in
accordance with their terms.
3. In the event any
provision of this compact exceeds the constitutional limits imposed on the
legislature of any member state, such provision shall be ineffective to the
extent of the conflict with the constitutional provision in question in that
member state.
ARTICLE XVIII. INDIAN
TRIBES
Notwithstanding any other provision in this compact, the
Interstate Commission may promulgate guidelines to permit Indian tribes to
utilize the compact to achieve any or all of the purposes of the compact as
specified in Article I. The Interstate
Commission shall make reasonable efforts to consult with Indian tribes in
promulgating guidelines to reflect the diverse circumstances of the various
Indian tribes.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260C.201, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Domestic child abuse. (a) If the court finds that the child is a
victim of domestic child abuse, as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 28
13, it may order any of the following dispositions of the case in addition
to or as alternatives to the dispositions authorized under subdivision 1:
(1) restrain any party
from committing acts of domestic child abuse;
(2) exclude the
abusing party from the dwelling which the family or household members share or
from the residence of the child;
(3) on the same basis
as is provided in chapter 518, establish temporary visitation with regard to
minor children of the adult family or household members;
(4) on the same basis
as is provided in chapter 518 or 518A, establish temporary support or
maintenance for a period of 30 days for minor children or a spouse;
(5) provide counseling
or other social services for the family or household members; or
(6) order the abusing
party to participate in treatment or counseling services.
Any relief granted by the order for protection shall be for a
fixed period not to exceed one year.
(b) No order excluding
the abusing party from the dwelling may be issued unless the court finds that:
(1) the order is in
the best interests of the child or children remaining in the dwelling;
(2) a remaining adult
family or household member is able to care adequately for the child or children
in the absence of the excluded party; and
(3) the local welfare
agency has developed a plan to provide appropriate social services to the
remaining family or household members.
(c) Upon a finding
that the remaining parent is able to care adequately for the child and enforce
an order excluding the abusing party from the home and that the provision of
supportive services by the responsible social services agency is no longer
necessary, the responsible social services agency may be dismissed as a party
to the proceedings. Orders entered regarding
the abusing party remain in full force and effect and may be renewed by the
remaining parent as necessary for the continued protection of the child for
specified periods of time, not to exceed one year.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260C.201, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Review of court-ordered placements;
permanent placement determination.
(a) This subdivision and subdivision 11a do not apply in to
cases where the child is in placement due solely to foster care for
treatment of the child's developmental disability or emotional disturbance,
where legal custody has not been transferred to the
responsible social services agency, and where the court finds
compelling reasons under section 260C.007, subdivision 8, to continue
the child in foster care past the time periods specified in this subdivision
chapter 260D. Foster care placements
of children due solely to their disability for treatment are
governed by section 260C.141, subdivision 2a chapter 260D. In all other cases where the child is in
foster care or in the care of a noncustodial parent under subdivision 1, the
court shall commence proceedings to determine the permanent status of a child
not later than 12 months after the child is placed in foster care or in the care
of a noncustodial parent. At the
admit-deny hearing commencing such proceedings, the court shall determine
whether there is a prima facie basis for finding that the agency made
reasonable efforts, or in the case of an Indian child active efforts, required
under section 260.012 and proceed according to the rules of juvenile court.
For purposes of this subdivision, the date of the child's
placement in foster care is the earlier of the first court-ordered placement or
60 days after the date on which the child has been voluntarily placed in foster
care by the child's parent or guardian.
For purposes of this subdivision, time spent by a child under the
protective supervision of the responsible social services agency in the home of
a noncustodial parent pursuant to an order under subdivision 1 counts towards
the requirement of a permanency hearing under this subdivision or subdivision
11a. Time spent on a trial home visit
counts towards the requirement of a permanency hearing under this subdivision
and a permanency review for a child under eight years of age under subdivision
11a.
For purposes of this subdivision, 12 months is calculated as
follows:
(1) during the
pendency of a petition alleging that a child is in need of protection or
services, all time periods when a child is placed in foster care or in the home
of a noncustodial parent are cumulated;
(2) if a child has
been placed in foster care within the previous five years under one or more
previous petitions, the lengths of all prior time periods when the child was
placed in foster care within the previous five years are cumulated. If a child under this clause has been in
foster care for 12 months or more, the court, if it is in the best interests of
the child and for compelling reasons, may extend the total time the child may
continue out of the home under the current petition up to an additional six months
before making a permanency determination.
(b) Unless the
responsible social services agency recommends return of the child to the
custodial parent or parents, not later than 30 days prior to the admit-deny
hearing required under paragraph (a) and the rules of juvenile court, the
responsible social services agency shall file pleadings in juvenile court to
establish the basis for the juvenile court to order permanent placement of the
child, including a termination of parental rights petition, according to
paragraph (d). Notice of the hearing and
copies of the pleadings must be provided pursuant to section 260C.152.
(c) The permanency
proceedings shall be conducted in a timely fashion including that any trial
required under section 260C.163 shall be commenced within 60 days of the
admit-deny hearing required under paragraph (a). At the conclusion of the permanency
proceedings, the court shall:
(1) order the child
returned to the care of the parent or guardian from whom the child was removed;
or
(2) order a permanent
placement or termination of parental rights if permanent placement or
termination of parental rights is in the child's best interests. The "best interests of the child"
means all relevant factors to be considered and evaluated. Transfer of permanent legal and physical
custody, termination of parental rights, or guardianship and legal custody to
the commissioner through a consent to adopt are preferred permanency options
for a child who cannot return home.
(d) If the child is
not returned to the home, the court must order one of the following
dispositions:
(1) permanent legal
and physical custody to a relative in the best interests of the child according
to the following conditions:
(i) an order for transfer of permanent legal and physical
custody to a relative shall only be made after the court has reviewed the
suitability of the prospective legal and physical custodian;
(ii) in transferring permanent legal and physical custody to
a relative, the juvenile court shall follow the standards applicable under this
chapter and chapter 260, and the procedures set out in the juvenile court
rules;
(iii) an order establishing permanent legal and physical
custody under this subdivision must be filed with the family court;
(iv) a transfer of legal and physical custody includes
responsibility for the protection, education, care, and control of the child
and decision making on behalf of the child;
(v) the social services agency may bring a petition or motion
naming a fit and willing relative as a proposed permanent legal and physical
custodian. The commissioner of human
services shall annually prepare for counties information that must be given to
proposed custodians about their legal rights and obligations as custodians
together with information on financial and medical benefits for which the child
is eligible; and
(vi) the juvenile court may maintain jurisdiction over the
responsible social services agency, the parents or guardian of the child, the
child, and the permanent legal and physical custodian for purposes of ensuring
appropriate services are delivered to the child and permanent legal custodian
or for the purpose of ensuring conditions ordered by the court related to the
care and custody of the child are met;
(2) termination of
parental rights when the requirements of sections 260C.301 to 260C.328 are met
or according to the following conditions:
(i) order the social services agency to file a petition for
termination of parental rights in which case all the requirements of sections
260C.301 to 260C.328 remain applicable; and
(ii) an adoption completed subsequent to a determination
under this subdivision may include an agreement for communication or contact
under section 259.58;
(3) long-term foster
care according to the following conditions:
(i) the court may order a child into long-term foster care
only if it approves the responsible social service agency's compelling reasons
that neither an award of permanent legal and physical custody to a relative,
nor termination of parental rights is in the child's best interests;
(ii) further, the court may only order long-term foster care
for the child under this section if it finds the following:
(A) the child has reached age 12 and the responsible social
services agency has made reasonable efforts to locate and place the child with
an adoptive family or with a fit and willing relative who will agree to a
transfer of permanent legal and physical custody of the child, but such efforts
have not proven successful; or
(B) the child is a sibling of a child described in subitem
(A) and the siblings have a significant positive relationship and are ordered
into the same long-term foster care home; and
(iii) at least annually, the responsible social services
agency reconsiders its provision of services to the child and the child's
placement in long-term foster care to ensure that:
(A) long-term foster care continues to be the most
appropriate legal arrangement for meeting the child's need for permanency and
stability, including whether there is another permanent placement option under
this chapter that would better serve the child's needs and best interests;
(B) whenever possible, there is an identified long-term
foster care family that is committed to being the foster family for the child
as long as the child is a minor or under the jurisdiction of the court;
(C) the child is receiving appropriate services or assistance
to maintain or build connections with the child's family and community;
(D) the child's physical and mental health needs are being
appropriately provided for; and
(E) the child's educational needs are being met;
(4) foster care for a
specified period of time according to the following conditions:
(i) foster care for a specified period of time may be ordered
only if:
(A) the sole basis for an adjudication that the child is in
need of protection or services is the child's behavior;
(B) the court finds that foster care for a specified period
of time is in the best interests of the child; and
(C) the court approves the responsible social services
agency's compelling reasons that neither an award of permanent legal and
physical custody to a relative, nor termination of parental rights is in the
child's best interests;
(ii) the order does not specify that the child continue in
foster care for any period exceeding one year; or
(5) guardianship and
legal custody to the commissioner of human services under the following
procedures and conditions:
(i) there is an identified prospective adoptive home agreed
to by the responsible social services agency having legal custody of the child
pursuant to court order under this section that has agreed to adopt the child
and the court accepts the parent's voluntary consent to adopt under section
259.24, except that such consent executed by a parent under this item,
following proper notice that consent given under this provision is irrevocable
upon acceptance by the court, shall be irrevocable unless fraud is established
and an order issues permitting revocation as stated in item (vii);
(ii) if the court accepts a consent to adopt in lieu of
ordering one of the other enumerated permanency dispositions, the court must
review the matter at least every 90 days.
The review will address the reasonable efforts of the agency to achieve
a finalized adoption;
(iii) a consent to adopt under this clause vests all legal
authority regarding the child, including guardianship and legal custody of the
child, with the commissioner of human services as if the child were a state
ward after termination of parental rights;
(iv) the court must forward a copy of the consent to adopt,
together with a certified copy of the order transferring guardianship and legal
custody to the commissioner, to the commissioner;
(v) if an adoption is not finalized by the identified
prospective adoptive parent within 12 months of the execution of the consent to
adopt under this clause, the commissioner of human services or the
commissioner's delegate shall pursue adoptive placement in another home unless
the commissioner certifies that the failure to finalize is not due to either an
action or a failure to act by the prospective adoptive parent;
(vi) notwithstanding item (v), the commissioner of human
services or the commissioner's designee must pursue adoptive placement in another
home as soon as the commissioner or commissioner's designee determines that
finalization of the adoption with the identified prospective adoptive parent is
not possible, that the identified prospective adoptive parent is not willing to
adopt the child, that the identified prospective adoptive parent is not
cooperative in completing the steps necessary to finalize the adoption, or upon
the commissioner's determination to withhold consent to the adoption.
(vii) unless otherwise required by the Indian Child Welfare
Act, United States Code, title 25, section 1913, a consent to adopt executed
under this section, following proper notice that consent given under this
provision is irrevocable upon acceptance by the court, shall be irrevocable
upon acceptance by the court except upon order permitting revocation issued by
the same court after written findings that consent was obtained by fraud.
(e) In ordering a
permanent placement of a child, the court must be governed by the best
interests of the child, including a review of the relationship between the
child and relatives and the child and other important persons with whom the
child has resided or had significant contact.
When the court has determined that permanent placement of the child away
from the parent is necessary, the court shall consider permanent alternative
homes that are available both inside and outside the state.
(f) Once a permanent
placement determination has been made and permanent placement has been
established, further court reviews are necessary if:
(1) the placement is
long-term foster care or foster care for a specified period of time;
(2) the court orders
further hearings because it has retained jurisdiction of a transfer of
permanent legal and physical custody matter;
(3) an adoption has not
yet been finalized; or
(4) there is a
disruption of the permanent or long-term placement.
(g) Court reviews of an
order for long-term foster care, whether under this section or section
260C.317, subdivision 3, paragraph (d), must be conducted at least yearly and
must review the child's out-of-home placement plan and the reasonable efforts
of the agency to finalize the permanent plan for the child including the
agency's efforts to:
(1) ensure that
long-term foster care continues to be the most appropriate legal arrangement
for meeting the child's need for permanency and stability or, if not, to
identify and attempt to finalize another permanent placement option under this
chapter that would better serve the child's needs and best interests;
(2) identify a specific
long-term foster home for the child, if one has not already been identified;
(3) support continued
placement of the child in the identified home, if one has been identified;
(4) ensure appropriate
services are provided to address the physical health, mental health, and
educational needs of the child during the period of long-term foster care and
also ensure appropriate services or assistance to maintain relationships with
appropriate family members and the child's community; and
(5) plan for the
child's independence upon the child's leaving long-term foster care living as
required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1.
(h) In the event it is
necessary for a child that has been ordered into foster care for a specified
period of time to be in foster care longer than one year after the permanency
hearing held under this section, not later than 12 months after the time the
child was ordered into foster care for a specified period of time, the matter
must be returned to
court for a review of the appropriateness of continuing the
child in foster care and of the responsible social services agency's reasonable
efforts to finalize a permanent plan for the child; if it is in the child's
best interests to continue the order for foster care for a specified period of
time past a total of 12 months, the court shall set objectives for the child's
continuation in foster care, specify any further amount of time the child may
be in foster care, and review the plan for the safe return of the child to the
parent.
(i) An order permanently placing a child out of the home of
the parent or guardian must include the following detailed findings:
(1) how the child's
best interests are served by the order;
(2) the nature and
extent of the responsible social service agency's reasonable efforts, or, in
the case of an Indian child, active efforts to reunify the child with the
parent or guardian where reasonable efforts are required;
(3) the parent's or
parents' efforts and ability to use services to correct the conditions which
led to the out-of-home placement; and
(4) that the
conditions which led to the out-of-home placement have not been corrected so
that the child can safely return home.
(j) An order for
permanent legal and physical custody of a child may be modified under sections
518.18 and 518.185. The social services
agency is a party to the proceeding and must receive notice. A parent may only seek modification of an
order for long-term foster care upon motion and a showing by the parent of a
substantial change in the parent's circumstances such that the parent could
provide appropriate care for the child and that removal of the child from the
child's permanent placement and the return to the parent's care would be in the
best interest of the child. The
responsible social services agency may ask the court to vacate an order for
long-term foster care upon a prima facie showing that there is a factual basis
for the court to order another permanency option under this chapter and that
such an option is in the child's best interests. Upon a hearing where the court determines
that there is a factual basis for vacating the order for long-term foster care
and that another permanent order regarding the placement of the child is in the
child's best interests, the court may vacate the order for long-term foster
care and enter a different order for permanent placement that is in the child's
best interests. The court shall not
require further reasonable efforts to reunify the child with the parent or
guardian as a basis for vacating the order for long-term foster care and
ordering a different permanent placement in the child's best interests. The county attorney must file pleadings and
give notice as required under the rules of juvenile court in order to modify an
order for long-term foster care under this paragraph.
(k) The court shall
issue an order required under this section within 15 days of the close of the
proceedings. The court may extend
issuing the order an additional 15 days when necessary in the interests of
justice and the best interests of the child.
(l) This paragraph
applies to proceedings required under this subdivision when the child is on a
trial home visit:
(1) if the child is on
a trial home visit 12 months after the child was placed in foster care or in
the care of a noncustodial parent as calculated in this subdivision, the
responsible social services agency may file a report with the court regarding
the child's and parent's progress on the trial home visit and its reasonable
efforts to finalize the child's safe and permanent return to the care of the
parent in lieu of filing the pleadings required under paragraph (b). The court shall make findings regarding
reasonableness of the responsible social services efforts to finalize the
child's return home as the permanent order in the best interests of the
child. The court may continue the trial
home visit to a total time not to exceed six months as provided in subdivision
1. If the court finds the responsible
social services agency has not made reasonable efforts to finalize the child's
return home as the permanent order in the best interests of the child, the
court may order other or additional efforts to support the child remaining in
the care of the parent; and
(2) if a trial home visit ordered or continued at proceedings
under this subdivision terminates, the court shall re-commence proceedings
under this subdivision to determine the permanent status of the child not later
than 30 days after the child is returned to foster care.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260C.209, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Multistate information. For every background study completed under
this section, the subject of the background study shall provide the responsible
social services agency with a set of classifiable fingerprints obtained from an
authorized agency. The responsible social
services agency shall provide the fingerprints to the commissioner, and the
commissioner shall obtain criminal history data from the National Criminal
Records Repository by submitting the fingerprints to the Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension.
In cases involving the emergency relative placement of
children under section 245A.035, the social services agency or county
attorney may request a name-based check of the National Criminal Records
Repository. In those cases, fingerprints
of the individual being checked must be forwarded to the Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension for submission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation within 15
calendar days of the name-based check.
If the subject of the name-based check does not provide fingerprints
upon request, the child or children must be removed from the home.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260C.212, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Agency responsibilities for parents and
children in placement. (a) When a
child is in foster care, the responsible social services agency shall make diligent
efforts to identify, locate, and, where appropriate, offer services to both
parents of the child.
(1) The responsible social services agency shall assess
whether a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent is willing and capable of
providing for the day-to-day care of the child temporarily or permanently. An assessment under this clause may include,
but is not limited to, obtaining information under section 260C.209. If after assessment, the responsible social
services agency determines that a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent is
willing and capable of providing day-to-day care of the child, the responsible
social services agency may seek authority from the custodial parent or the
court to have that parent assume day-to-day care of the child. If a parent is not an adjudicated parent, the
responsible social services agency shall require the nonadjudicated parent to
cooperate with paternity establishment procedures as part of the case plan.
(2) If, after assessment, the responsible social services agency
determines that the child cannot be in the day-to-day care of either parent,
the agency shall:
(i) prepare an out-of-home placement plan addressing the
conditions that each parent must meet before the child can be in that parent's
day-to-day care; and
(ii) provide a parent who is the subject of a background study
under section 260C.209 15 days' notice that it intends to use the study to
recommend against putting the child with that parent, as well as the notice
provided in section 260C.209, subdivision 4, and the court shall afford the
parent an opportunity to be heard concerning the study.
The results of a background study of a noncustodial parent
shall not be used by the agency to determine that the parent is incapable of
providing day-to-day care of the child unless the agency reasonably believes
that placement of the child into the home of that parent would endanger the
child's health, safety, or welfare.
(3) If, after the provision of services following an
out-of-home placement plan under this section, the child cannot return to the
care of the parent from whom the child was removed or who had legal custody at
the time the child was placed in foster care, the agency may petition on behalf
of a noncustodial parent to establish legal custody with that parent under
section 260C.201, subdivision 11. If
paternity has not already been established, it may be established in the same
proceeding in the manner provided for under chapter 257.
(4) The responsible social services agency may be relieved of
the requirement to locate and offer services to both parents by the juvenile
court upon a finding of good cause after the filing of a petition under section
260C.141.
(b) The responsible social services agency shall give notice
to the parent or guardian of each child in foster care, other than a child in
voluntary foster care for treatment under chapter 260D, of the following
information:
(1) that the child's placement in foster care may result in
termination of parental rights or an order permanently placing the child out of
the custody of the parent, but only after notice and a hearing as required
under chapter 260C and the juvenile court rules;
(2) time limits on the length of placement and of
reunification services, including the date on which the child is expected to be
returned to and safely maintained in the home of the parent or parents or
placed for adoption or otherwise permanently removed from the care of the
parent by court order;
(3) the nature of the services available to the parent;
(4) the consequences to the parent and the child if the
parent fails or is unable to use services to correct the circumstances that led
to the child's placement;
(5) the first consideration for placement with relatives;
(6) the benefit to the child in getting the child out of
foster care as soon as possible, preferably by returning the child home, but if
that is not possible, through a permanent legal placement of the child away
from the parent;
(7) when safe for the child, the benefits to the child and
the parent of maintaining visitation with the child as soon as possible in the
course of the case and, in any event, according to the visitation plan under
this section; and
(8) the financial responsibilities and obligations, if any,
of the parent or parents for the support of the child during the period the
child is in foster care.
(c) The responsible social services agency shall inform a
parent considering voluntary placement of a child under subdivision 8, of the
following information:
(1) the parent and the child each has a right to separate
legal counsel before signing a voluntary placement agreement, but not to
counsel appointed at public expense;
(2) the parent is not required to agree to the voluntary
placement, and a parent who enters a voluntary placement agreement may at any
time request that the agency return the child.
If the parent so requests, the child must be returned within 24 hours of
the receipt of the request;
(3) evidence gathered during the time the child is
voluntarily placed may be used at a later time as the basis for a petition
alleging that the child is in need of protection or services or as the basis
for a petition seeking termination of parental rights or other permanent
placement of the child away from the parent;
(4) if the responsible social services agency files a
petition alleging that the child is in need of protection or services or a
petition seeking the termination of parental rights or other permanent
placement of the child away from the parent, the parent would have the right to
appointment of separate legal counsel and the child would have a right to the
appointment of counsel and a guardian ad litem as provided by law, and that
counsel will be appointed at public expense if they are unable to afford
counsel; and
(5) the timelines and procedures for review of voluntary
placements under subdivision 3, and the effect the time spent in voluntary
placement on the scheduling of a permanent placement determination hearing
under section 260C.201, subdivision 11.
(d) When an agency accepts a child for placement, the agency
shall determine whether the child has had a physical examination by or under
the direction of a licensed physician within the 12 months immediately
preceding the date when the child came into the agency's care. If there is documentation that the child has
had an examination within the last 12 months, the agency is responsible for
seeing that the child has another physical examination within one year of the documented
examination and annually in subsequent years.
If the agency determines that the child has not had a physical
examination within the 12 months immediately preceding placement, the agency
shall ensure that the child has an examination within 30 days of coming into
the agency's care and once a year in subsequent years.
(e) Whether under state guardianship or not, if a child
leaves foster care by reason of having attained the age of majority under state
law, the child must be given at no cost a copy of the child's social and
medical history, as defined in section 259.43, and education report.
Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260C.212, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Administrative or court review of
placements. (a) There shall be an
administrative review of the out-of-home placement plan of each child placed in
foster care no later than 180 days after the initial placement of the child in
foster care and at least every six months thereafter if the child is not
returned to the home of the parent or parents within that time. The out-of-home placement plan must be
monitored and updated at each administrative review. The administrative review shall be conducted
by the responsible social services agency using a panel of appropriate persons
at least one of whom is not responsible for the case management of, or the
delivery of services to, either the child or the parents who are the subject of
the review. The administrative review
shall be open to participation by the parent or guardian of the child and the
child, as appropriate.
(b) As an alternative to the administrative review required
in paragraph (a), the court may, as part of any hearing required under the
Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure, conduct a hearing to monitor
and update the out-of-home placement plan pursuant to the procedure and
standard in section 260C.201, subdivision 6, paragraph (d). The party requesting review of the
out-of-home placement plan shall give parties to the proceeding notice of the request
to review and update the out-of-home placement plan. A court review conducted pursuant to section
260C.193; 260C.201, subdivision 1 or 11; 260C.141, subdivision 2 or 2a, clause
(2); or 260C.317 shall satisfy the requirement for the review so long as the
other requirements of this section are met.
(c) As appropriate to the stage of the proceedings and
relevant court orders, the responsible social services agency or the court
shall review:
(1) the safety, permanency needs, and well-being of the
child;
(2) the continuing necessity for and appropriateness of the
placement;
(3) the extent of compliance with the out-of-home placement
plan;
(4) the extent of progress which has been made toward
alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating placement in foster care;
(5) the projected date by which the child may be returned to
and safely maintained in the home or placed permanently away from the care of
the parent or parents or guardian; and
(6) the appropriateness of the services provided to the
child.
(d) When a child is age 16 or older, in addition to any
administrative review conducted by the agency, at the review required under
section 260C.201, subdivision 11, paragraph (d), clause (3), item (iii); or
260C.317, subdivision 3, clause (3), the court shall review the independent
living plan required under subdivision 1, paragraph (c), clause (8), and the
provision of services to the child related to the well-being of the child as
the child prepares to leave foster care.
The review shall include the actual plans related to each item in the
plan necessary to the child's future safety and well-being when the child is no
longer in foster care.
(1) At the court review, the responsible social services
agency shall establish that it has given the notice required under Minnesota
Rules, part 9560.0060, regarding the right to continued access to services for
certain children in foster care past age 18 and of the right to appeal a denial
of social services under section 256.245 256.045. If the agency is unable to establish that the
notice, including the right to appeal a denial of social services, has been
given, the court shall require the agency to give it.
(2) The court shall make findings regarding progress toward or
accomplishment of the following goals:
(i) the child has obtained a high school diploma or its
equivalent;
(ii) the child has completed a driver's education course or
has demonstrated the ability to use public transportation in the child's
community;
(iii) the child is employed or enrolled in postsecondary
education;
(iv) the child has applied for and obtained postsecondary
education financial aid for which the child is eligible;
(v) the child has health care coverage and health care
providers to meet the child's physical and mental health needs;
(vi) the child has applied for and obtained disability income
assistance for which the child is eligible;
(vii) the child has obtained affordable housing with necessary
supports, which does not include a homeless shelter;
(viii) the child has saved sufficient funds to pay for the
first month's rent and a damage deposit;
(ix) the child has an alternative affordable housing plan, which
does not include a homeless shelter, if the original housing plan is
unworkable;
(x) the child, if male, has registered for the Selective
Service; and
(xi) the child has a permanent connection to a caring adult.
(3) The court shall ensure that the responsible agency in
conjunction with the placement provider assists the child in obtaining the
following documents prior to the child's leaving foster care: a Social Security card; the child's birth
certificate; a state identification card or driver's license, green card, or
school visa; the child's school, medical, and dental records; a contact list of
the child's medical, dental, and mental health providers; and contact
information for the child's siblings, if the siblings are in foster care.
Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260D.07, is amended to read:
260D.07 REQUIRED PERMANENCY
REVIEW HEARING.
(a) When the court has found that the voluntary arrangement is
in the child's best interests and that the agency and parent are appropriately
planning for the child pursuant to the report submitted under section 260D.06,
and the child continues in voluntary foster care as defined in section 260D.02,
subdivision 10, for 13 months from the date of the voluntary foster care
agreement, or has been in placement for 15 of the last 22 months, the agency
must:
(1) terminate the voluntary foster care agreement and return
the child home; or
(2) determine whether there are compelling reasons to
continue the voluntary foster care arrangement and, if the agency determines
there are compelling reasons, seek judicial approval of its determination; or
(3) file a petition for the termination of parental rights.
(b) When the agency is asking for the court's approval of its
determination that there are compelling reasons to continue the child in the
voluntary foster care arrangement, the agency shall file a "Petition for
Permanency Review Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster Care for
Treatment" and ask the court to proceed under this section.
(c) The "Petition for Permanency Review Regarding a
Child in Voluntary Foster Care for Treatment" shall be drafted or approved
by the county attorney and be under oath.
The petition shall include:
(1) the date of the voluntary placement agreement;
(2) whether the petition is due to the child's developmental
disability or emotional disturbance;
(3) the plan for the ongoing care of the child and the
parent's participation in the plan;
(4) a description of the parent's visitation and contact with
the child;
(5) the date of the court finding that the foster care
placement was in the best interests of the child, if required under section
260D.06, or the date the agency filed the motion under section 260D.09,
paragraph (b);
(6) the agency's reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent
plan for the child, including returning the child to the care of the child's
family; and
(7) a citation to this chapter as the basis for the petition.
(d) An updated copy of the out-of-home placement plan
required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1, shall be filed with the
petition.
(e) The court shall set the date for the permanency review
hearing no later than 14 months after the child has been in placement or within
30 days of the petition filing date when the child has been in placement 15 of
the last 22 months. The court shall
serve the petition together with a notice of hearing by United States mail on
the parent, the child age 12 or older, the child's guardian ad litem, if one
has been appointed, the agency, the county attorney, and counsel for any party.
(f) The court shall conduct the permanency review hearing on
the petition no later than 14 months after the date of the voluntary placement
agreement, within 30 days of the filing of the petition when the child has been
in placement 15 days of the last 22 months, or within 15 days of a motion to
terminate jurisdiction and to dismiss an order for foster care under chapter
260C, as provided in section 260D.09, paragraph (b).
(g) At the permanency review hearing, the court shall:
(1) inquire of the parent if the parent has reviewed the
"Petition for Permanency Review Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster Care
for Treatment," whether the petition is accurate, and whether the parent
agrees to the continued voluntary foster care arrangement as being in the
child's best interests;
(2) inquire of the parent if the parent is satisfied with the
agency's reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child,
including whether there are services available and accessible to the parent
that might allow the child to safely be with the child's family;
(3) inquire of the parent if the parent consents to the court
entering an order that:
(i) approves the responsible agency's reasonable efforts to
finalize the permanent plan for the child, which includes ongoing future
planning for the safety, health, and best interests of the child; and
(ii) approves the responsible agency's determination that
there are compelling reasons why the continued voluntary foster care
arrangement is in the child's best interests; and
(4) inquire of the child's guardian ad litem and any other
party whether the guardian or the party agrees that:
(i) the court should approve the responsible agency's
reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child, which includes
ongoing and future planning for the safety, health, and best interests of the
child; and
(ii) the court should approve of the responsible agency's
determination that there are compelling reasons why the continued voluntary
foster care arrangement is in the child's best interests.
(h) At a permanency review hearing under this section, the
court may take the following actions based on the contents of the sworn
petition and the consent of the parent:
(1) approve the agency's compelling reasons that the
voluntary foster care arrangement is in the best interests of the child; and
(2) find that the agency has made reasonable efforts to
finalize a plan for the permanent plan for the child.
(i) A child, age 12 or older, may object to the agency's
request that the court approve its compelling reasons for the continued
voluntary arrangement and may be heard on the reasons for the objection. Notwithstanding the child's objection, the
court may approve the agency's compelling reasons and the voluntary
arrangement.
(j) If the court does not approve the voluntary arrangement
after hearing from the child or the child's guardian ad litem, the court shall
dismiss the petition. In this case,
either:
(1) the child must be returned to the care of the parent; or
(2) the agency must file a petition under section 260C.141,
asking for appropriate relief under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, or
260C.301.
(k) When the court approves the agency's compelling reasons
for the child to continue in voluntary foster care for treatment, and finds
that the agency has made reasonable efforts to finalize a permanent plan for
the child, the court shall approve the continued voluntary foster care
arrangement, and continue the matter under the court's jurisdiction for the
purposes of reviewing the child's placement every 12 months while the child is
in foster care.
(l) A finding that the court approves the continued voluntary
placement means the agency has continued legal authority to place the child
while a voluntary placement agreement remains in effect. The parent or the agency may terminate a
voluntary agreement as provided in section 260D.10. Termination of a voluntary foster care
placement of an Indian child is governed by section 260.765, subdivision 4.
Sec. 8. Laws 2008,
chapter 361, article 6, section 58, is amended to read:
Sec. 58. REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.
(a) In each section of Minnesota Statutes referred to in
column A, the revisor of statutes shall delete the reference in column B and
insert the reference in column C.
Column
A Column
B Column
C
259.67 260.851,
article 5 260.853
260.93, article 4
256B.094 260.851 260.853
260.93
(b) In each section of Minnesota Rules referred to in
column A, the revisor of statutes shall delete the reference in column B and
insert the reference in column C.
Column
A Column
B Column
C
9545.0755 260.851
to 260.91 260.855
to 260.93
9545.0815 260.851 260.93
9550.6210 260.851
to 260.91 260.855
to 260.93
9560.0130 260.851 260.93
(c) The revisor of statutes shall replace
"Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children" with
"Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children" wherever it
appears in rules or statutes.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective upon legislative enactment of the compact in Minnesota Statutes,
section 260.93, into law by no less than 35 states. The commissioner of human services shall inform
the revisor of statutes when this occurs.
Sec. 9. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.209, subdivision
4, is repealed.
ARTICLE 2
CHILD WELFARE POLICY
Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.46, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. General. (a) Unless the data is summary data or a
statute specifically provides a different classification, data on individuals
collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by the welfare system is private
data on individuals, and shall not be disclosed except:
(1) according to section 13.05;
(2) according to court order;
(3) according to a statute specifically authorizing
access to the private data;
(4) to an agent of the welfare system, including a law
enforcement person, attorney, or investigator acting for it in the
investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil proceeding relating to the
administration of a program;
(5) to personnel of the welfare system who require the
data to verify an individual's identity; determine eligibility, amount of
assistance, and the need to provide services to an individual or family across
programs; evaluate the effectiveness of programs; assess parental contribution
amounts; and investigate suspected fraud;
(6) to administer federal funds or programs;
(7) between personnel of the welfare system working in
the same program;
(8) to the Department of Revenue to assess parental
contribution amounts for purposes of section 252.27, subdivision 2a, administer
and evaluate tax refund or tax credit programs and to identify individuals who
may benefit from these programs. The
following information may be disclosed under this paragraph: an individual's and their dependent's names,
dates of birth, Social Security numbers, income, addresses, and other data as
required, upon request by the Department of Revenue. Disclosures by the commissioner of revenue to
the commissioner of human services for the purposes described in this clause
are governed by section 270B.14, subdivision 1.
Tax refund or tax credit programs include, but are not limited to, the
dependent care credit under section 290.067, the Minnesota working family
credit under section 290.0671, the property tax refund and rental credit under
section 290A.04, and the Minnesota education credit under section 290.0674;
(9) between the Department of Human Services, the
Department of Employment and Economic Development, and when applicable, the
Department of Education, for the following purposes:
(i) to monitor the eligibility of the data subject for
unemployment benefits, for any employment or training program administered,
supervised, or certified by that agency;
(ii) to administer any rehabilitation program or child
care assistance program, whether alone or in conjunction with the welfare system;
(iii) to monitor and evaluate the Minnesota family
investment program or the child care assistance program by exchanging data on
recipients and former recipients of food support, cash assistance under chapter
256, 256D, 256J, or 256K, child care assistance under chapter 119B, or medical
programs under chapter 256B, 256D, or 256L; and
(iv) to analyze public assistance employment services
and program utilization, cost, effectiveness, and outcomes as implemented under
the authority established in Title II, Sections 201-204 of the Ticket to Work
and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999.
Health records governed by sections 144.291 to 144.298 and
"protected health information" as defined in Code of Federal
Regulations, title 45, section 160.103, and governed by Code of Federal
Regulations, title 45, parts 160-164, including health care claims utilization
information, must not be exchanged under this clause;
(10) to appropriate parties in connection with an
emergency if knowledge of the information is necessary to protect the health or
safety of the individual or other individuals or persons;
(11) data maintained by residential programs as defined
in section 245A.02 may be disclosed to the protection and advocacy system
established in this state according to Part C of Public Law 98-527 to protect
the legal and human rights of persons with developmental disabilities or other
related conditions who live in residential facilities for these persons if the
protection and advocacy system receives a complaint by or on behalf of that
person and the person does not have a legal guardian or the state or a designee
of the state is the legal guardian of the person;
(12) to the county medical examiner or the county
coroner for identifying or locating relatives or friends of a deceased person;
(13) data on a child support obligor who makes payments
to the public agency may be disclosed to the Minnesota Office of Higher
Education to the extent necessary to determine eligibility under section
136A.121, subdivision 2, clause (5);
(14) participant Social Security numbers and names
collected by the telephone assistance program may be disclosed to the
Department of Revenue to conduct an electronic data match with the property tax
refund database to determine eligibility under section 237.70, subdivision 4a;
(15) the current address of a Minnesota family
investment program participant may be disclosed to law enforcement officers who
provide the name of the participant and notify the agency that:
(i) the participant:
(A) is a fugitive felon fleeing to avoid prosecution,
or custody or confinement after conviction, for a crime or attempt to commit a
crime that is a felony under the laws of the jurisdiction from which the
individual is fleeing; or
(B) is violating a condition of probation or parole
imposed under state or federal law;
(ii) the location or apprehension of the felon is
within the law enforcement officer's official duties; and
(iii) the request is made in writing and in the proper
exercise of those duties;
(16) the current address of a recipient of general
assistance or general assistance medical care may be disclosed to probation
officers and corrections agents who are supervising the recipient and to law
enforcement officers who are investigating the recipient in connection with a
felony level offense;
(17) information obtained from food support applicant
or recipient households may be disclosed to local, state, or federal law
enforcement officials, upon their written request, for the purpose of
investigating an alleged violation of the Food Stamp Act, according to Code of
Federal Regulations, title 7, section 272.1(c);
(18) the address, Social Security number, and, if
available, photograph of any member of a household receiving food support shall
be made available, on request, to a local, state, or federal law enforcement
officer if the officer furnishes the agency with the name of the member and
notifies the agency that:
(i) the member:
(A) is fleeing to avoid prosecution, or custody or
confinement after conviction, for a crime or attempt to commit a crime that is
a felony in the jurisdiction the member is fleeing;
(B) is violating a condition of probation or parole
imposed under state or federal law; or
(C) has information that is necessary for the officer
to conduct an official duty related to conduct described in subitem (A) or (B);
(ii) locating or apprehending the member is within the
officer's official duties; and
(iii) the request is made in writing and in the proper
exercise of the officer's official duty;
(19) the current address of a recipient of Minnesota
family investment program, general assistance, general assistance medical care,
or food support may be disclosed to law enforcement officers who, in writing,
provide the name of the recipient and notify the agency that the recipient is a
person required to register under section 243.166, but is not residing at the
address at which the recipient is registered under section 243.166;
(20) certain information regarding child support
obligors who are in arrears may be made public according to section 518A.74;
(21) data on child support payments made by a child
support obligor and data on the distribution of those payments excluding
identifying information on obligees may be disclosed to all obligees to whom
the obligor owes support, and data on the enforcement actions undertaken by the
public authority, the status of those actions, and data on the income of the
obligor or obligee may be disclosed to the other party;
(22) data in the work reporting system may be
disclosed under section 256.998, subdivision 7;
(23) to the Department of Education for the purpose of
matching Department of Education student data with public assistance data to
determine students eligible for free and reduced-price meals, meal supplements,
and free milk according to United States Code, title 42, sections 1758, 1761,
1766, 1766a, 1772, and 1773; to allocate federal and state funds that are
distributed based on income of the student's family; and to verify receipt of
energy assistance for the telephone assistance plan;
(24) the current address and telephone number of
program recipients and emergency contacts may be released to the commissioner
of health or a local board of health as defined in section 145A.02, subdivision
2, when the commissioner or local board of health has reason to believe that a
program recipient is a disease case, carrier, suspect case, or at risk of
illness, and the data are necessary to locate the person;
(25) to other state agencies, statewide systems, and
political subdivisions of this state, including the attorney general, and
agencies of other states, interstate information networks, federal agencies,
and other entities as required by federal regulation or law for the
administration of the child support enforcement program;
(26) to personnel of public assistance programs as
defined in section 256.741, for access to the child support system database for
the purpose of administration, including monitoring and evaluation of those
public assistance programs;
(27) to monitor and evaluate the Minnesota family
investment program by exchanging data between the Departments of Human Services
and Education, on recipients and former recipients of food support, cash
assistance under chapter 256, 256D, 256J, or 256K, child care assistance under
chapter 119B, or medical programs under chapter 256B, 256D, or 256L;
(28) to evaluate child support program performance and
to identify and prevent fraud in the child support program by exchanging data
between the Department of Human Services, Department of Revenue under section
270B.14, subdivision 1, paragraphs (a) and (b), without regard to the
limitation of use in paragraph (c), Department of Health, Department of
Employment and Economic Development, and other state agencies as is reasonably
necessary to perform these functions; or
(29) counties operating child care assistance programs
under chapter 119B may disseminate data on program participants, applicants,
and providers to the commissioner of education.; or
(30) child support data on the parents and the child
may be disclosed to agencies administering programs under Titles IV-E and IV-B
of the Social Security Act, as provided by federal law. Data may be disclosed only to the extent
necessary for the purpose of establishing parentage or for determining who has
or may have parental rights with respect to a child, which could be related to
permanency planning.
(b) Information on persons who have been treated for
drug or alcohol abuse may only be disclosed according to the requirements of
Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.1 to 2.67.
(c) Data provided to law enforcement agencies under
paragraph (a), clause (15), (16), (17), or (18), or paragraph (b), are
investigative data and are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation
is active. The data are private after
the investigation becomes inactive under section 13.82, subdivision 5,
paragraph (a) or (b).
(d) Mental health data shall be treated as provided in
subdivisions 7, 8, and 9, but is not subject to the access provisions of
subdivision 10, paragraph (b).
For the purposes of this subdivision, a request will
be deemed to be made in writing if made through a computer interface system.
Sec. 2.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.01, subdivision 14b, is amended to
read:
Subd. 14b. American Indian child welfare projects. (a) The commissioner of human services may
authorize projects to test tribal delivery of child welfare services to
American Indian children and their parents and custodians living on the reservation. The commissioner has authority to solicit and
determine which tribes may participate in a project. Grants may be issued to Minnesota Indian
tribes to support the projects. The
commissioner may waive existing state rules as needed to accomplish the
projects. Notwithstanding section
626.556, the commissioner may authorize projects to use alternative methods of
investigating and assessing reports of child maltreatment, provided that the
projects comply with the provisions of section 626.556 dealing with the rights
of individuals who are subjects of reports or investigations, including notice
and appeal rights and data practices requirements. The commissioner may seek any federal
approvals necessary to carry out the projects as well as seek and use any funds
available to the commissioner, including use of federal funds, foundation
funds, existing grant funds, and other funds.
The commissioner is authorized to advance state funds as necessary to
operate the projects. Federal
reimbursement applicable to the projects is appropriated to the commissioner
for the purposes of the projects. The
projects must be required to address responsibility for safety, permanency, and
well-being of children.
(b) For the purposes of this section, "American
Indian child" means a person under 18 years of age who is a tribal member
or eligible for membership in one of the tribes chosen for a project under this
subdivision and who is residing on the reservation of that tribe.
(c) In order to qualify for an American Indian child
welfare project, a tribe must:
(1) be one of the existing tribes with reservation
land in Minnesota;
(2) have a tribal court with jurisdiction over child
custody proceedings;
(3) have a substantial number of children for whom
determinations of maltreatment have occurred;
(4) have capacity to respond to reports of abuse and
neglect under section 626.556;
(5) provide a wide range of services to families in
need of child welfare services; and
(6) have a tribal-state title IV-E agreement in
effect.
(d) Grants awarded under this section may be used for
the nonfederal costs of providing child welfare services to American Indian
children on the tribe's reservation, including costs associated with:
(1) assessment and prevention of child abuse and neglect;
(2) family preservation;
(3) facilitative, supportive, and reunification
services;
(4) out-of-home placement for children removed from
the home for child protective purposes; and
(5) other activities and services approved by the
commissioner that further the goals of providing safety, permanency, and
well-being of American Indian children.
(e) When a tribe has initiated a project and has been
approved by the commissioner to assume child welfare responsibilities for
American Indian children of that tribe under this section, the affected county
social service agency is relieved of responsibility for responding to reports
of abuse and neglect under section 626.556 for those children during the time
within which the tribal project is in effect and funded. The commissioner shall work with tribes and
affected counties to develop procedures for data collection, evaluation, and
clarification of ongoing role and financial responsibilities of the county and
tribe for child welfare services prior to initiation of the project. Children who have not been identified by the
tribe as participating in the project shall remain the responsibility of the
county. Nothing in this section shall alter
responsibilities of the county for law enforcement or court services.
(f) Participating tribes may conduct children's mental
health screenings under section 245.4874, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause
(14), for children who are eligible for the initiative and living on the
reservation and who meet one of the following criteria:
(1) the child must be receiving child protective
services;
(2) the child must be in foster care; or
(3) the child's parents must have had parental rights
suspended or terminated.
Tribes may
access reimbursement from available state funds for conducting the
screenings. Nothing in this section
shall alter responsibilities of the county for providing services under section
245.487.
(g) Participating tribes may establish a local child
mortality review panel. In establishing
a local child mortality review panel, the tribe agrees to conduct local child
mortality reviews for child deaths or near-fatalities occurring on the
reservation under section 256.01, subdivision 12. Tribes with established child mortality
review panels shall have access to nonpublic data and shall protect nonpublic
data under section 256.01, subdivision 12, paragraphs (c) to (e). The tribe shall provide written notice to the
commissioner and affected counties when a local child mortality review panel
has been established and shall provide data upon request of the commissioner
for purposes of sharing nonpublic data with members of the state child
mortality review panel in connection to an individual case.
(f) (h) The commissioner shall
collect information on outcomes relating to child safety, permanency, and
well-being of American Indian children who are served in the projects. Participating tribes must provide information
to the state in a format and completeness deemed acceptable by the state to
meet state and federal reporting requirements.
Sec. 3.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 259.52, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. Requirement to search registry before
adoption petition can be granted; proof of search. No petition for adoption may be granted
unless the agency supervising the adoptive placement, the birth mother of the
child, or, in the case of a stepparent or relative adoption, the county agency
responsible for the report required under section 259.53, subdivision 1,
requests that the commissioner of health search the registry to determine
whether a putative father is registered in relation to a child who is or may be
the subject of an adoption petition. The
search required by this subdivision must be conducted no sooner than 31 days
following the birth of the child. A
search of the registry may be proven by the production of a certified copy of
the registration form or by a certified statement of the commissioner of health
that after a search no registration of a putative father in relation to a child
who is or may be the subject of an adoption petition could be located. The filing of a certified copy of an order
from a juvenile protection matter under chapter 260C containing a finding that
certification of the requisite search of the Minnesota fathers' adoption
registry was filed with the court in that matter shall also constitute proof of
search. Certification that the fathers'
adoption registry has been searched must be filed with the court prior to entry
of any
final order of adoption. In addition to the search required by this
subdivision, the agency supervising the adoptive placement, the birth mother of
the child, or, in the case of a stepparent or relative adoption, the social
services agency responsible for the report under section 259.53, subdivision 1,
or the responsible social services agency that is a petitioner in a juvenile
protection matter under chapter 260C may request that the commissioner of
health search the registry at any time. Search
requirements of this section do not apply when the responsible social services
agency is proceeding under Safe Place for Newborns, section 260C.217.
Sec. 4.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 259.52, subdivision 6, is amended to
read:
Subd. 6. Who may register. Any putative father may register with the
fathers' adoption registry. However,
Any limitation on a putative father's right to assert an interest in the child
as provided in this section applies only in adoption proceedings,
termination of parental rights proceedings under chapter 260C, and only to
those putative fathers not entitled to notice and consent under sections 259.24
and 259.49, subdivision 1, paragraph (a) or (b), clauses (1) to (7).
Sec. 5.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260.012, is amended to read:
260.012
DUTY TO ENSURE PLACEMENT PREVENTION AND FAMILY REUNIFICATION; REASONABLE
EFFORTS.
(a) Once a child alleged to be in need of protection
or services is under the court's jurisdiction, the court shall ensure that
reasonable efforts, including culturally appropriate services, by the social
services agency are made to prevent placement or to eliminate the need for
removal and to reunite the child with the child's family at the earliest
possible time, and the court must ensure that the responsible social services
agency makes reasonable efforts to finalize an alternative permanent plan for
the child as provided in paragraph (e).
In determining reasonable efforts to be made with respect to a child and
in making those reasonable efforts, the child's best interests, health, and safety
must be of paramount concern. Reasonable
efforts to prevent placement and for rehabilitation and reunification are
always required except upon a determination by the court that a petition has
been filed stating a prima facie case that:
(1) the parent has subjected a child to egregious harm
as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 14;
(2) the parental rights of the parent to another child
have been terminated involuntarily;
(3) the child is an abandoned infant under section
260C.301, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (2);
(4) the parent's custodial rights to another child
have been involuntarily transferred to a relative under section 260C.201,
subdivision 11, paragraph (e), clause (1), or a similar law of another
jurisdiction; or
(5) the provision of services or further services for
the purpose of reunification is futile and therefore unreasonable under the
circumstances.
(b) When the court makes one of the prima facie
determinations under paragraph (a), either permanency pleadings under section
260C.201, subdivision 11, or a termination of parental rights petition under
sections 260C.141 and 260C.301 must be filed.
A permanency hearing under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, must be
held within 30 days of this determination.
(c) In the case of an Indian child, in proceedings
under sections 260B.178 or 260C.178, 260C.201, and 260C.301 the juvenile court
must make findings and conclusions consistent with the Indian Child Welfare Act
of 1978, United States Code, title 25, section 1901 et seq., as to the
provision of active efforts. In cases
governed by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, United States Code, title 25,
section 1901, the responsible social services agency must provide active
efforts as required under United States Code, title 25, section 1911(d).
(d) "Reasonable efforts to prevent placement"
means:
(1) the agency has made reasonable efforts to prevent
the placement of the child in foster care by working with the family to
develop and implement a safety plan; or
(2) given the particular circumstances of the child and
family at the time of the child's removal, there are no services or efforts
available which could allow the child to safely remain in the home.
(e) "Reasonable efforts to finalize a permanent
plan for the child" means due diligence by the responsible social services
agency to:
(1) reunify the child with the parent or guardian from
whom the child was removed;
(2) assess a noncustodial parent's ability to provide
day-to-day care for the child and, where appropriate, provide services
necessary to enable the noncustodial parent to safely provide the care, as
required by section 260C.212, subdivision 4;
(3) conduct a relative search to identify and
provide notice to adult relatives as required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 5; and
(4) place siblings removed from their home in the same
home for foster care, adoption, or transfer permanent legal and physical
custody to a relative. Visitation
between siblings who are not in the same foster care, adoption, or custodial
placement or facility shall be consistent with section 260C.212, subdivision 2;
and
(4) (5) when the child cannot return to the parent
or guardian from whom the child was removed, to plan for and finalize a safe
and legally permanent alternative home for the child, and considers permanent
alternative homes for the child inside or outside of the state, preferably
through adoption or transfer of permanent legal and physical custody of the
child.
(f) Reasonable efforts are made upon the exercise of
due diligence by the responsible social services agency to use culturally
appropriate and available services to meet the needs of the child and the
child's family. Services may include
those provided by the responsible social services agency and other culturally
appropriate services available in the community. At each stage of the proceedings where the
court is required to review the appropriateness of the responsible social
services agency's reasonable efforts as described in paragraphs (a), (d), and
(e), the social services agency has the burden of demonstrating that:
(1) it has made reasonable efforts to prevent placement
of the child in foster care;
(2) it has made reasonable efforts to eliminate the
need for removal of the child from the child's home and to reunify the child
with the child's family at the earliest possible time;
(3) it has made reasonable efforts to finalize an
alternative permanent home for the child, and considers permanent alternative
homes for the child inside or outside of the state; or
(4) reasonable efforts to prevent placement and to
reunify the child with the parent or guardian are not required. The agency may meet this burden by stating facts
in a sworn petition filed under section 260C.141, by filing an affidavit
summarizing the agency's reasonable efforts or facts the agency believes
demonstrate there is no need for reasonable efforts to reunify the parent and
child, or through testimony or a certified report required under juvenile court
rules.
(g) Once the court determines that reasonable efforts
for reunification are not required because the court has made one of the prima
facie determinations under paragraph (a), the court may only require reasonable
efforts for reunification after a hearing according to section 260C.163, where
the court finds there is not clear and convincing
evidence of the facts upon which the court based its
prima facie determination. In this case
when there is clear and convincing evidence that the child is in need of
protection or services, the court may find the child in need of protection or
services and order any of the dispositions available under section 260C.201,
subdivision 1. Reunification of a
surviving child with a parent is not required if the parent has been convicted
of:
(1) a violation of, or an attempt or conspiracy to
commit a violation of, sections 609.185 to 609.20; 609.222, subdivision 2; or
609.223 in regard to another child of the parent;
(2) a violation of section 609.222, subdivision 2; or
609.223, in regard to the surviving child; or
(3) a violation of, or an attempt or conspiracy to
commit a violation of, United States Code, title 18, section 1111(a) or
1112(a), in regard to another child of the parent.
(h) The juvenile court, in proceedings under sections
260B.178 or 260C.178, 260C.201, and 260C.301 shall make findings and
conclusions as to the provision of reasonable efforts. When determining whether reasonable efforts
have been made, the court shall consider whether services to the child and
family were:
(1) relevant to the safety and protection of the child;
(2) adequate to meet the needs of the child and family;
(3) culturally appropriate;
(4) available and accessible;
(5) consistent and timely; and
(6) realistic under the circumstances.
In the alternative, the court may determine that
provision of services or further services for the purpose of rehabilitation is
futile and therefore unreasonable under the circumstances or that reasonable
efforts are not required as provided in paragraph (a).
(i) This section does not prevent out-of-home placement
for treatment of a child with a mental disability when it is determined to
be medically necessary as a result of the child's diagnostic assessment or
individual treatment plan indicates that appropriate and necessary treatment
cannot be effectively provided outside of a residential or inpatient treatment
program and the level or intensity of supervision and treatment cannot be
effectively and safely provided in the child's home or community and it is
determined that a residential treatment setting is the least restrictive
setting that is appropriate to the needs of the child.
(j) If continuation of reasonable efforts to prevent placement
or reunify the child with the parent or guardian from whom the child was
removed is determined by the court to be inconsistent with the permanent plan
for the child or upon the court making one of the prima facie determinations
under paragraph (a), reasonable efforts must be made to place the child in a
timely manner in a safe and permanent home and to complete whatever steps are
necessary to legally finalize the permanent placement of the child.
(k) Reasonable efforts to place a child for adoption or
in another permanent placement may be made concurrently with reasonable efforts
to prevent placement or to reunify the child with the parent or guardian from
whom the child was removed. When the
responsible social services agency decides to concurrently make reasonable
efforts for both reunification and permanent placement away from the parent
under paragraph (a), the agency shall disclose its decision and both plans for
concurrent reasonable efforts to all parties and the court. When the agency discloses its decision to
proceed on both plans for reunification and permanent placement away from the
parent, the court's review of the agency's reasonable efforts shall include the
agency's efforts under both plans.
Sec. 6.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260B.007, subdivision 7, is amended to
read:
Subd. 7. Foster care. "Foster care" means the 24 hour
a day care of a child in any facility which for gain or otherwise regularly
provides one or more children, when unaccompanied by their parents, with a substitute
for the care, food, lodging, training, education, supervision or treatment they
need but which for any reason cannot be furnished by their parents or legal
guardians in their homes. "Foster care" means 24-hour
substitute care for children placed away from their parents or guardian and for
whom a responsible social services agency has placement and care
responsibility. Foster care includes,
but is not limited to, placement in foster family homes, foster homes of
relatives, group homes, emergency shelters, residential facilities not excluded
in this subdivision, child care institutions, and preadoptive homes. A child is in foster care under this
definition regardless of whether the facility is licensed and payments are made
for the cost of care. Nothing in this
definition creates any authority to place a child in a home or facility that is
required to be licensed which is not licensed.
Foster care does not include placement in any of the following
facilities: hospitals, inpatient
chemical dependency treatment facilities, facilities that are primarily for
delinquent children, any corrections facility or program within a particular
corrections facility not meeting requirements for Title IV-E facilities as
determined by the commissioner, facilities to which a child is committed under
the provision of chapter 253B, forestry camps, or jails. Foster care is intended to provide for a
child's safety or to access treatment.
Foster care must not be used as a punishment or consequence for a
child's behavior.
Sec. 7.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260B.157, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Juvenile treatment screening team. (a) The local social services agency shall
establish a juvenile treatment screening team to conduct screenings and prepare
case plans under this subdivision. The
team, which may be the team constituted under section 245.4885 or 256B.092 or
Minnesota Rules, parts 9530.6600 to 9530.6655, shall consist of social workers,
juvenile justice professionals, and persons with expertise in the treatment of
juveniles who are emotionally disabled, chemically dependent, or have a
developmental disability. The team shall
involve parents or guardians in the screening process as appropriate. The team may be the same team as defined in
section 260C.157, subdivision 3.
(b) If the court, prior to, or as part of, a final
disposition, proposes to place a child:
(1) for the primary purpose of treatment for an
emotional disturbance, and residential placement is consistent with section
260.012, a developmental disability, or chemical dependency in a
residential treatment facility out of state or in one which is within the state
and licensed by the commissioner of human services under chapter 245A; or
(2) in any out-of-home setting potentially exceeding
30 days in duration, including a postdispositional post-dispositional
placement in a facility licensed by the commissioner of corrections or human
services, the court shall notify the county welfare agency. The county's juvenile treatment screening
team must either:
(i) screen and evaluate the child and file its
recommendations with the court within 14 days of receipt of the notice; or
(ii) elect not to screen a given case, and notify the
court of that decision within three working days.
(c) If the screening team has elected to screen and
evaluate the child, the child may not be placed for the primary purpose of
treatment for an emotional disturbance, a developmental disability, or chemical
dependency, in a residential treatment facility out of state nor in a
residential treatment facility within the state that is licensed under chapter
245A, unless one of the following conditions applies:
(1) a treatment professional certifies that an
emergency requires the placement of the child in a facility within
the state;
(2) the screening team has evaluated the child and
recommended that a residential placement is necessary to meet the child's
treatment needs and the safety needs of the community, that it is a
cost-effective means of meeting the treatment needs, and that it will be of
therapeutic value to the child; or
(3) the court, having reviewed a screening team
recommendation against placement, determines to the contrary that a residential
placement is necessary. The court shall
state the reasons for its determination in writing, on the record, and shall
respond specifically to the findings and recommendation of the screening team
in explaining why the recommendation was rejected. The attorney representing the child and the
prosecuting attorney shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard on the
matter.
Sec. 8.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260B.198, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1. Court order, findings, remedies, treatment. If the court finds that the child is
delinquent, it shall enter an order making any of the following dispositions of
the case which are deemed necessary to the rehabilitation of the child:
(1) counsel the child or the parents, guardian, or
custodian;
(2) place the child under the supervision of a
probation officer or other suitable person in the child's own home under
conditions prescribed by the court including reasonable rules for the child's
conduct and the conduct of the child's parents, guardian, or custodian,
designed for the physical, mental, and moral well-being and behavior of the
child, or with the consent of the commissioner of corrections, in a group
foster care facility which is under the management and supervision of said
commissioner;
(3) if the court determines that the child is a
danger to self or others, subject to the supervision of the court, transfer
legal custody of the child to one of the following:
(i) a child-placing agency; or
(ii) the local social services agency; or
(iii) a reputable individual of good moral
character. No person may receive custody
of two or more unrelated children unless licensed as a residential facility
pursuant to sections 245A.01 to 245A.16; or
(iv) a county home school, if the county maintains a
home school or enters into an agreement with a county home school; or
(v) a county probation officer for placement in a
group foster home established under the direction of the juvenile court and
licensed pursuant to section 241.021;
(4) transfer legal custody by commitment to the
commissioner of corrections;
(5) if the child is found to have violated a state or
local law or ordinance which has resulted in damage to the person or property
of another, the court may order the child to make reasonable restitution for
such damage;
(6) require the child to pay a fine of up to
$1,000. The court shall order payment of
the fine in accordance with a time payment schedule which shall not impose an
undue financial hardship on the child;
(7) if the child is in need of special treatment and
care for reasons of physical or mental health, the court may order the child's
parent, guardian, or custodian to provide it.
If the parent, guardian, or custodian fails to provide this treatment or
care, the court may order it provided;
(8) if the court believes that it is in the best
interests of the child and of public safety that the driver's license of the
child be canceled until the child's 18th birthday, the court may recommend to
the commissioner of public safety the cancellation of the child's license for
any period up to the child's 18th birthday, and the commissioner is hereby
authorized to cancel such license without a hearing. At any time before the termination of the period
of cancellation, the court may, for good cause, recommend to the commissioner
of public safety that the child be authorized to apply for a new license, and
the commissioner may so authorize;
(9) if the court believes that it is in the best
interest of the child and of public safety that the child is enrolled in
school, the court may require the child to remain enrolled in a public school
until the child reaches the age of 18 or completes all requirements needed to
graduate from high school. Any child enrolled
in a public school under this clause is subject to the provisions of the Pupil
Fair Dismissal Act in chapter 127;
(10) if the child is petitioned and found by the court
to have committed a controlled substance offense under sections 152.021 to
152.027, the court shall determine whether the child unlawfully possessed or
sold the controlled substance while driving a motor vehicle. If so, the court shall notify the
commissioner of public safety of its determination and order the commissioner
to revoke the child's driver's license for the applicable time period specified
in section 152.0271. If the child does
not have a driver's license or if the child's driver's license is suspended or
revoked at the time of the delinquency finding, the commissioner shall, upon
the child's application for driver's license issuance or reinstatement, delay
the issuance or reinstatement of the child's driver's license for the
applicable time period specified in section 152.0271. Upon receipt of the court's order, the commissioner
is authorized to take the licensing action without a hearing;
(11) if the child is petitioned and found by the court
to have committed or attempted to commit an act in violation of section
609.342; 609.343; 609.344; 609.345; 609.3451; 609.746, subdivision 1; 609.79;
or 617.23, or another offense arising out of a delinquency petition based on
one or more of those sections, the court shall order an independent
professional assessment of the child's need for sex offender treatment. An assessor providing an assessment for the
court must be experienced in the evaluation and treatment of juvenile sex
offenders. If the assessment indicates
that the child is in need of and amenable to sex offender treatment, the court
shall include in its disposition order a requirement that the child undergo
treatment. Notwithstanding sections
13.384, 13.85, 144.291 to 144.298, 260B.171, or 626.556, the assessor has
access to the following private or confidential data on the child if access is
relevant and necessary for the assessment:
(i) medical data under section 13.384;
(ii) corrections and detention data under section
13.85;
(iii) health records under sections 144.291 to
144.298;
(iv) juvenile court records under section 260B.171;
and
(v) local welfare agency records under section 626.556.
Data disclosed under this clause may be used only for
purposes of the assessment and may not be further disclosed to any other
person, except as authorized by law;
(12) if the child is found delinquent due to the
commission of an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult, the
court shall make a specific finding on the record regarding the juvenile's
mental health and chemical dependency treatment needs;
(13) any order for a disposition authorized under this
section shall contain written findings of fact to support the disposition
ordered and shall also set forth in writing the following information:
(i) why the best interests of the child are served by
the disposition ordered; and
(ii) what alternative dispositions were considered by the
court and why such dispositions were not appropriate in the instant case.
Sec. 9.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.007, subdivision 18, is amended to
read:
Subd. 18. Foster care. "Foster care" means 24 hour
substitute care for children placed away from their parents or guardian and for
whom a responsible social services agency has placement and care
responsibility. "Foster care" includes, but is not limited to,
placement in foster family homes, foster homes of relatives, group homes,
emergency shelters, residential facilities not excluded in this subdivision,
child care institutions, and preadoptive homes.
A child is in foster care under this definition regardless of whether
the facility is licensed and payments are made for the cost of care. Nothing in this definition creates any
authority to place a child in a home or facility that is required to be
licensed which is not licensed. "Foster care" does not include
placement in any of the following facilities: hospitals, inpatient chemical
dependency treatment facilities, facilities that are primarily for delinquent
children, any corrections facility or program within a particular correction's
facility not meeting requirements for Title IV-E facilities as determined by
the commissioner, facilities to which a child is committed under the provision
of chapter 253B, forestry camps, or jails.
Foster care is intended to provide for a child's safety or to access
treatment. Foster care must not be used
as a punishment or consequence for a child's behavior.
Sec. 10.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.007, subdivision 25, is amended to
read:
Subd. 25. Parent.
"Parent" means the birth or adoptive parent of a minor.
a person who has a legal parent and child relationship with a child under
section 257.52 which confers or imposes on the person legal rights, privileges,
duties, and obligations. It includes the
mother and child relationship and the father and child relationship. For an Indian child matters
governed by the Indian Child Welfare Act, parent includes any Indian person
who has adopted a child by tribal law or custom, as provided in section
260.755, subdivision 14. For matters
governed by the Indian Child Welfare Act, parent does not include the unwed
father where paternity has not been acknowledged or established. Parent does not mean a putative father of a
child unless the putative father also meets the requirements of section 257.55
or unless the putative father is entitled to notice under section 259.49,
subdivision 1.
Sec. 11. [260C.150] DILIGENT EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY
PARENTS OF A CHILD; PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW; REASONABLE EFFORTS.
Subdivision 1.
Determining parentage. A parent and child relationship may be
established under this chapter according to the requirements of section 257.54
and the Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure.
Subd. 2.
Genetic test results; duty to
cooperate. (a) For purposes
of proceedings under this chapter, a positive test result under section 257.62,
subdivision 5, shall be used by the court to treat a person determined to be
the biological father of a child by a positive test as if the individual were a
presumed father under section 257.55, including giving the biological father
the right to notice of proceedings and the right to be assessed and considered
for day-to-day care of his child under section 260C.212, subdivision 4.
(b) Nothing in this subdivision relieves a person
determined to be the biological father of the child by a positive test from the
duty to cooperate with paternity establishment proceedings under section
260C.212, subdivision 4.
Subd. 3.
Identifying parents of child;
diligent efforts; data. (a)
The responsible social services agency shall make diligent efforts to identify
and locate both parents of any child who is the subject of proceedings under
this chapter. Diligent efforts include:
(1) asking the custodial or known parent to identify
any nonresident parent of the child and provide information that can be used to
verify the nonresident parent's identity including the dates and locations of
marriages and divorces, dates and locations of any legal proceedings regarding
paternity, date and place of the child's birth,
nonresident parent's full legal name, nonresident
parent's date of birth, if the nonresident parent's date of birth is unknown,
an approximate age, the nonresident parent's Social Security number, the
nonresident parent's whereabouts including last known whereabouts, and the whereabouts
of relatives of the nonresident parent.
For purposes of this subdivision, "nonresident parent" means a
parent who does not reside in the same household as the child or did not reside
in the same household as the child at the time the child was removed when the
child is in foster care;
(2) obtaining information that will identify and locate
the nonresident parent from the county and state of Minnesota child support
enforcement information system;
(3) requesting a search of the Minnesota Fathers'
Adoption Registry 30 days after the child's birth; and
(4) using any other reasonable means to identify and
locate the nonresident parent.
(b) The agency may disclose data which is otherwise
private under section 13.46 or 626.556 in order to carry out its duties under
this subdivision.
Subd. 4.
Court inquiry regarding
identities of both parents. At
the first hearing regarding the petition and at any subsequent hearings, as
appropriate, the court shall inquire of the parties whether the identities and whereabouts
of both parents of the child are known and correctly reflected in the petition
filed with the court. If either the
identity or whereabouts of both parents is not known, the court shall make
inquiry on the record of any party or participant present regarding the
identity and whereabouts of the unknown parent of the child.
Subd. 5.
Sworn testimony from known
parent. When the county
attorney requests, the court shall have the custodial or known parent of the
child sworn for the purpose of answering questions relevant to the identity of
a child's other parent in any proceeding under this chapter. The county attorney may request this
information at any point in the proceedings if the custodial or known parent
has not been cooperative in providing information to identify and locate the
nonresident parent or information that may lead to identifying and locating the
nonresident parent. If the child's
custodial or known parent testifies that disclosure of identifying information
regarding the identity of the nonresident parent would cause either the
custodial or known parent, the child, or another family member to be
endangered, the court may make a protective order regarding any information
necessary to protect the custodial or known parent, the child, or family
member. Consistent with section
260C.212, subdivision 4, paragraph (a), clause (4), if the child remains in the
care of the known or custodial parent and the court finds it in the child's
best interests, the court may waive notice to the nonresident parent of the
child if such notice would endanger the known or custodial parent, the child,
or another family member.
Subd. 6.
Court review of diligent
efforts and service. As soon
as possible, but not later than the first review hearing required under the
Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure, unless the responsible social
services agency has identified and located both parents of the child, the
agency shall include in its report to the court required under the Minnesota
Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure a description of its diligent efforts to
locate any parent who remains unknown or who the agency has been unable to
locate. The court shall determine
whether (1) diligent efforts have been made by the agency to identify both
parents of the child, (2) both parents have been located, and (3) both parents
have been served with the summons or notice of the proceedings required by
section 260C.151 or 260C.152 and the Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection
Procedure. If the court determines the
agency has not made diligent efforts to locate both parents of the child or if
both parents of the child have not been served as required by the rules, the
court shall order the agency to take further steps to identify and locate both
parents of the child identifying what further specific efforts are
appropriate. If the summons has not been
served on the parent as required by section 260C.151, subdivision 1, the court
shall order further efforts to complete service.
Subd. 7.
Reasonable efforts findings. When the court finds the agency has made
diligent efforts to identify and locate both parents of the child and one or
both parents remain unknown or cannot be located, the court may find that the
agency has made reasonable efforts under sections 260.012, 260C.178, 260C.201,
and 260C.301, subdivision 8, regarding any parent who remains unknown or cannot
be located. The court may also find that
further reasonable efforts for reunification with the parent who cannot be
identified or located would be futile.
Subd. 8.
Safe place for newborns. Neither the requirements of this
subdivision nor the search requirements of section 259.52, subdivision 2, apply
when the agency is proceeding under section 260C.217. When the agency is proceeding under section
260C.217, the agency has no duty to identify and locate either parent of the
newborn and no notice or service of summons on either parent is required under
section 260C.151 or 260C.152 or the Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection
Procedure.
Sec. 12.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.151, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1. Issuance of summons. After a petition has been filed and unless
the parties hereinafter named voluntarily appear, the court shall set a time
for a hearing and shall issue a summons requiring the child's parents or
legal guardian and any person who has legal custody or control
of the child to appear with the child before the court at a time and
place stated. The summons shall have a
copy of the petition attached, and shall advise the parties of the right to
counsel and of the consequences of failure to obey the summons. The court shall give docket priority to any
child in need of protection or services or neglected and in foster care, that
contains allegations of child abuse over any other case. As used in this subdivision, "child
abuse" has the meaning given it in section 630.36, subdivision 2.
Sec. 13.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.151, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. Notice; child in need of protection or
services. After a petition has
been filed alleging a child to be in need of protection or services and unless
the persons named in clauses clause (1) to (4) or (2)
voluntarily appear or are summoned according to subdivision 1 appears,
the court shall issue a notice to:
(1) an adjudicated or presumed father of the child;
(2) an alleged (1) a putative father of
the child, including any putative father who has timely registered with the
Minnesota Fathers' Adoption Registry under section 259.52; and
(3) a noncustodial mother; and
(4) (2) a
grandparent with the right to participate under section 260C.163, subdivision
2.
Sec. 14.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.151, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a.
Notice; termination of
parental rights or permanency proceeding. (a) After a petition for termination of
parental rights or petition for permanent placement of a child away from a
parent under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, has been filed, the court shall
set a time for the admit or deny hearing as required under the Minnesota Rules
of Juvenile Protection Procedure and shall issue a summons requiring the
parents of the child to appear before the court at the time and place stated. The court shall issue a notice to:
(1) a putative father who has timely registered with
the Minnesota Fathers' Adoption Registry and who is entitled to notice of an
adoption proceeding under section 259.49, subdivision 1; and
(2) a grandparent with the right to participate under
section 260C.163, subdivision 2.
(b) Neither summons nor notice under this section or
section 260C.152 of a termination of parental rights matter or other permanent
placement matter under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, is required to be
given to a putative father who has failed to timely register with the Minnesota
Father's Adoption Registry under section 259.52 unless that individual also
meets the requirements of section 257.55 or, is required to be given notice
under section 259.49, subdivision 1.
When a putative father is not entitled to notice under this clause and
is therefore not given notice, any order terminating his rights does not give
rise to a presumption of parental unfitness under section 260C.301, subdivision
1, paragraph (b), clause (4).
Sec. 15.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260C.151, subdivision 3, is amended to
read: