STATE OF
MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-EIGHTH
SESSION - 2013
_____________________
FORTY-SECOND
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Tuesday, April 23, 2013
The House of Representatives convened at 11:00
a.m. and was called to order by Paul Thissen, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by Representative Linda
Slocum, District 50A, Richfield, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
A quorum was present.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There being
no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the Journal
was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 523 and
H. F. No. 690, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Mahoney moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 523 be substituted for
H. F. No. 690 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1307 and
H. F. No. 1182, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Schoen moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1307 be substituted for
H. F. No. 1182 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND
DIVISIONS
Murphy, E., from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 683, A bill for an act relating to water; creating Legislative Water Commission; modifying water use requirements; requiring a report on groundwater sustainability recommendations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 103G.271, subdivisions 1, 4; 103G.287, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 3.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Joint Rule 2.03 has been waived for any subsequent committee action on this bill.
The
report was adopted.
Murphy, E., from the Committee
on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 814, A bill for an act relating to
environment; requiring report of hazardous substance release to local 911
emergency dispatch center; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.671,
subdivision 10.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2012, section 609.671, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Failure to report release of hazardous
substance or extremely hazardous substance.
(a) A person is, upon conviction, subject to a fine of up to $25,000
or imprisonment for up to two years, or both, who:
(1)
is required to report the release of a hazardous substance under United States
Code, title 42, section 9603, or the release of an extremely hazardous
substance under United States Code, title 42, section 11004;
(2) knows that a hazardous substance or an extremely
hazardous substance has been released; and
(3) fails to provide immediate notification of the release
of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance or an extremely hazardous
substance to the state emergency response center and, or a
firefighting or law enforcement organization if directed by the center,
to notify a local 911 emergency dispatch center.
For purposes of clause (3), the state emergency response
center shall direct a caller to notify a local 911 emergency dispatch center if
the situation requires an immediate response or the area is unknown to the
center. In all other cases, the state
emergency response center must notify a local firefighting or law enforcement
organization of the situation within 24 hours of receiving the notification.
(b) For a second or subsequent conviction under this
subdivision, the violator is subject to a fine of up to $50,000 or imprisonment
for not more than five years, or both.
(c) For purposes of this subdivision, a "hazardous
substance" means a substance on the list established under United States
Code, title 42, section 9602.
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, an "extremely
hazardous substance" means a substance on the list established under
United States Code, title 42, section 11002.
(e) For purposes of this subdivision, a "reportable
quantity" means a quantity that must be reported under United States Code,
title 42, section 9602 or 11002.
(f) The penalties in paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply to
an employee of a state emergency response center to the extent that the
employee is acting in the scope of that employee's official duties.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1,
2014, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on
Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 879, A bill for an act relating to
energy; extending funding for research on renewable energy to the University of
Minnesota; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116C.779, subdivision 3.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 14, after "enactment" insert
"and requires allocations on July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2014"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on
Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1000, A bill
for an act relating to energy; requiring the commissioner of commerce to make
assessments to fund clean energy resource teams; amending Minnesota Statutes
2012, section 216B.241, subdivision 1e.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 7, delete "July 15" and insert
"June 30"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
SECOND READING
OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 814, 879 and
1000 were read for the second time.
SECOND READING
OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 523 and 1307 were
read for the second time.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 369, A bill for an act relating to community property; adopting the Uniform Community Property Rights at Death Act; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 519A.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 345, 658, 825
and 1291.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 345, A bill for an act relating to crime victims; authorizing a victim's estate to request or enforce an order for restitution; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 611A.04, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time.
Hilstrom moved that S. F. No. 345 and H. F. No. 410, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 658, A bill for an act relating to labor and industry; allowing the commissioner of labor and industry to issue compliance orders for violations of misrepresentations of employment relationships; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 177.27, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance and Policy.
S. F. No. 825, A bill for an act relating to health; making changes to the Medical Practice Act; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 147.001; 147.01, subdivision 1; 147.02, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 147.
The bill was read for the first time.
Allen moved that S. F. No. 825 and H. F. No. 1115, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1291, A bill for an act relating to mines; making technical, clarifying, and other policy changes to mine inspector provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 180.01; 180.02; 180.03; 180.04; 180.05; 180.08; 180.10; 180.11; 180.12; 180.13; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 180; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 180.06; 180.09.
The bill was read for the first time.
Anzelc moved that S. F. No. 1291 and H. F. No. 1320, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that the House recess
subject to the call of the Chair. The
motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by the Speaker.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 630 was reported
to the House.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 11, line 23, reinstate the stricken language
Page 11, lines 24 to 29, delete the new language
Page 12, after line 2, insert:
"(i)
A kindergarten pupil included in paragraph (d) is counted as .388 pupil units
for purposes of section 126C.09"
Page 12, delete section 12 and insert:
"Sec. 12. [126C.09]
ENHANCED ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT FOR EARLY LEARNERS.
A school board may allocate any revenue received through the kindergarten pupil enhanced achievement pupil weighting in section 1263C.05, subdivision 1, paragraph (g) for programs approved by the school board including half-day and free full-day kindergarten programs, programs designed to enhance literacy and other academic achievement for kindergarten through third grade students, class size reduction in kindergarten through grade three, or to provide teacher salary increases."
Page 27, line 22, delete "6,440,890,000" and insert "6,446,290,000"
Page 27, line 25, delete "$5,632,430,000" and insert "$5,637,830,000"
Page 161, line 5, delete "19,214,000" and insert "16,514,000"
Page 161, line 6, delete "19,386,000" and insert "16,586,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 153, line 26, after "245A" insert ", a half-day or full-day kindergarten program for which a fee is charged operated by a school district, charter school, or nonpublic school that is accredited by an accrediting agency, recognized according to section 123B.445, or recognized by the commissioner of education,"
Page 155, line 5, after "in" insert "a free" and after "kindergarten" insert "program, first grade,"
Page 155, line 6, delete "six" and insert "seven"
Page
155, line 17, delete "or" and insert a comma and before "for"
insert ", or a qualifying kindergarten program"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 78 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 50, delete section 15 and insert:
"Sec. 15. [126C.101]
MINNESOTA'S WORLD'S BEST WORKFORCE.
Subdivision 1. Goals
for the world's best workforce. To
create the world's best workforce by 2027, Minnesota must strive to: close entirely the academic achievement gap
among all racial and ethnic groups of students and between students living in
poverty and students not living in poverty; achieve a 100 percent high school
graduation rate; achieve 100 percent grade-level literacy for students in third
grade; and have 100 percent of students attain career and college readiness
before graduating from high school to eliminate the need for postsecondary
developmental or remedial course instruction.
Subd. 2. Strategic
plans for attaining the world's best workforce. (a) A school board must formally
develop, implement, and periodically review and, where appropriate, revise a
comprehensive, long-term strategic education and budget plan for student
achievement premised on research-based strategies and efforts required for a
district and school to make progress toward realizing the goals in subdivision
1. The strategic plan for student achievement
must identify the state, regional, and local structures and systems,
interdistrict, intradistrict, and in-school strategies, inclusive best
education practices, and collaborative partnerships with regional centers under
subdivision 4, postsecondary institutions, and local and regional business and
industry to work effectively and efficiently toward making all students part of
the world's best workforce by 2027.
(b) The components of a board's plan may
include but are not limited to: innovative
and integrated prekindergarten through grade 12 learning environments that
include school enrollment options; family engagement initiatives that involve
families in their students' academic life and career success; professional
development opportunities for teachers, school administrators, and other
licensed school professionals focused on improving all students' academic
achievement and career and college readiness; increased programmatic
opportunities for all students, including historically underserved students,
focused on rigor in learning and career and college readiness, and recruitment
and retention of teachers and school administrators of diverse backgrounds. Plans must include at least formative
assessment practices, consistent with chapter 120B, and other instructional
best practices that inform cost-effective, research-based interventions,
improve student achievement, reduce disparities in students' academic
performance, and foster students' career and college readiness without need for
postsecondary remediation.
(c) The department or a regional center
of excellence, upon request, must assist a school board with developing,
implementing, reviewing, or revising its education and budget plan.
Subd. 3. Budgeting
and public hearing process. (a)
Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, a school board must hold at least one
formal hearing by March 1 each year to report to the public its progress in
realizing the goals contained in its strategic plan for student achievement, to
review the plan components, and to revise the plan where
appropriate. At the hearing, the board must provide the
public with longitudinal data from at least the three immediately preceding
school years demonstrating district and school progress in realizing its
student achievement goals, consistent with the measures for demonstrating
progress in paragraph (b). At least 30
days before the hearing, the board must post on the district Web site, in an
understandable, readily accessible format, up-to-date longitudinal data on
district and school progress. The
district, by March 1, must submit to the commissioner and its regional center
of excellence in an electronic format the district's annual budget for
continuing to implement its strategic plan for student achievement.
(b) The longitudinal data required under
paragraph (a) at least must be based on one or more of the following measures
and must report outcomes for all students and specific groups of students
identified under section 120B.35, subdivision 3: third grade at-grade-level literacy rates;
reductions in the disparity in academic achievement among all racial and ethnic
student groups and between students living in poverty and students not living
in poverty; high school graduation rates; rates for completing rigorous
coursework; rates for attaining career and college readiness; rates for
receiving postsecondary credit while enrolled in high school; students'
engagement and connection in school; and rates for awarding world language
proficiency or high achievement certificates under section 120B.022,
subdivision 1, paragraphs (b) and (c), and to the extent practicable, the rates
of graduating students required to complete developmental or remedial
instruction before enrolling in a course for credit at a Minnesota public
higher education institution.
(c) For the 2013-2014 school year only,
a board, after providing a 30-day notice on the district Web site, must hold a
formal hearing before March 1, 2014, to inform the public about the content of
its proposed strategic plan for student achievement under this section. The board also must submit its proposed plan
by March 1, 2014, to the commissioner and its regional center of excellence in
an electronic format.
Subd. 4. State
and regional support. (a)
Regional centers of excellence are established to assist and support school
boards, districts, and schools in implementing this section. The centers must collaborate with local and
regional service cooperatives, postsecondary institutions, integrated school
districts, the department, children's mental health providers, and other
interested entities to equitably support school boards, districts, and schools
throughout the region. Center support
may include assisting districts and schools with common principles of effective
practice, defining measurable education goals, implementing evidence-based
practices, engaging in data-driven decision making, reducing the use of
seclusion and restraints, providing multilayered levels of support, supporting
culturally responsive teaching and learning, aligning state and local academic
standards and career and college readiness benchmarks, and engaging parents,
families, youth, and the local community in district and school programs and
activities.
(b) The department must help the
regional centers of excellence meet staff, facilities, and technical needs,
provide the centers with programmatic support, and work with the centers to
establish a coherent statewide system of regional support, including
consulting, training, and technical support, to help school boards, districts,
and schools effectively and efficiently implement state and federal
initiatives.
(c) A school board, district, or a
school may seek assistance from the department directly without the need to
first seek center support.
Subd. 5. Evaluation. (a) The commissioner and each regional
center of excellence must collaborate in evaluating the success of districts
and schools in working effectively and efficiently toward creating the world's
best workforce by 2027. Where districts
and schools demonstrate effective use of resources and adequate progress toward
realizing plan goals, the commissioner and the regional centers of excellence
must promote and disseminate successful strategies to other districts and
schools throughout the state.
(b) If the commissioner, in consultation
with the affected regional center of excellence, determines a district or
charter school is not making adequate progress in realizing its student
achievement goals under this section, the department may reduce the district's
basic general education revenue by up to four percent per fiscal year, and
transfer that amount to the affected regional center of excellence for the
center to use to assist the district to effectively and efficiently realize its
student achievement goals.
(c) If, after a district
receives assistance under paragraph (b) for at least three consecutive school
years, the commissioner, in consultation with the affected regional center of
excellence and the affected district, identifies a school as persistently
failing to make adequate progress toward realizing the student achievement
goals contained in the strategic plan, the commissioner may require the school
to implement a turnaround strategy to improve the school's ability to
effectively and efficiently realize those goals.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2014 and later."
Erickson, S., moved to amend her amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line 33, after the period, insert "A Minnesota high school graduate who enrolls in a Minnesota public higher education institution within two years after graduating and is required to complete a developmental or remedial course before enrolling in a course for credit at that Minnesota public higher education institution may submit to the department a reimbursement request for the cost of the required developmental or remedial course. The department must transmit revenue to the student in an amount equal to the cost of the completed developmental or remedial course."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Marquart moved to amend the Erickson, S., amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete lines 2 to 27
Page 2, delete lines 1 to 36
Page 3, delete lines 1 to 36
Page 4, delete lines 1 to 4 and insert:
"Page 52, line 2, after "(c)" insert ", and to the extent practicable, the rates of graduating students required to complete developmental or remedial instruction before enrolling in a course or credit at a Minnesota public higher education institution"
Page 52, line 8, after the second period, insert "State and"
Page 52, after line 24, insert:
"(c) A school board, district, or a school may seek assistance from the department directly without the need to first seek center support.""
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
Erickson, S., withdrew her amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 27, line 14, after the period, insert "The commissioner must notify each district receiving aid under this section that this revenue will be provided through an equalized levy in subsequent years."
Page 27, delete section 29 and insert:
"Sec. 29. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. General
education aid. For general
education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.13, subdivision 4:
|
|
$6,092,415,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$6,440,890,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$781,842,000 for 2013 and $5,310,573,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$808,460,000 for 2014 and $5,632,430,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this
subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are
required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Enrollment
options transportation. For
transportation of pupils attending postsecondary institutions under Minnesota
Statutes, section 124D.09, or for transportation of pupils attending
nonresident districts under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.03:
|
|
$44,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$48,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 4. Abatement
revenue. For abatement aid
under Minnesota Statutes, section 127A.49:
|
|
$2,747,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,136,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $301,000
for 2013 and $2,446,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $385,000
for 2014 and $2,751,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Consolidation
transition. For districts
consolidating under Minnesota Statutes, section 123A.485:
|
|
$472,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$480,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $40,000
for 2013 and $432,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $68,000
for 2014 and $412,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 6. Nonpublic
pupil education aid. For
nonpublic pupil education aid under Minnesota Statutes, sections 123B.40 to
123B.43 and 123B.87:
|
|
$15,660,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$16,324,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,099,000 for 2013 and $13,561,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,121,000 for 2014 and $14,203,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 7. Nonpublic
pupil transportation. For
nonpublic pupil transportation aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.92,
subdivision 9:
|
|
$18,656,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$19,127,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,668,000 for 2013 and $15,988,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,501,000 for 2014 and $16,626,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 8. One-room
schoolhouse. For a grant to
Independent School District No. 690, Warroad, to operate the Angle Inlet
School:
|
|
$65,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$65,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 9. Compensatory
revenue pilot program. For
grants for participation in the compensatory revenue pilot program under Laws
2005, First Special Session chapter 5, article 1, section 50:
|
|
$2,325,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,325,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Of this amount, $1,500,000 each year is
for a grant to Independent School District No. 11, Anoka-Hennepin; $75,000
each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 286, Brooklyn
Center; $210,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 279,
Osseo; $160,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 281,
Robbinsdale; $165,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 535,
Rochester; $65,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 833,
South Washington County; and $150,000 each year is for a grant to Independent
School District No. 241, Albert Lea.
If a grant to a specific school district
is not awarded, the commissioner may increase the aid amounts to any of the
remaining participating school districts.
This appropriation is part of the base budget for subsequent fiscal years."
Page 83, delete section 26 and insert:
"Sec. 26. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department. The sums indicated in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education for the
fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Integration
aid. For integration aid
under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.86:
|
|
$17,197,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$0
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$17,197,000 for 2013 and $0 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $0 for
2014 and $0 for 2015.
Subd. 3. Achievement
and integration aid. For
achievement and integration aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.862:
|
|
$58,911,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$68,623,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$0 for 2013 and $58,911,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$9,273,000 for 2014 and $59,350,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 4. Literacy
incentive aid. For literacy
incentive aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.98:
|
|
$52,514,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$53,818,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$6,607,000 for 2013 and $45,907,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$7,225,000 for 2014 and $46,593,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Interdistrict
desegregation or integration transportation grants. For interdistrict desegregation or
integration transportation grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.87:
|
|
$13,968,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$14,712,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 6. Success
for the future. For American
Indian success for the future grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.81:
|
|
$2,137,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,137,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $290,000
for 2013 and $1,847,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $290,000
for 2014 and $1,847,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 7. American
Indian teacher preparation grants. For
joint grants to assist American Indian people to become teachers under
Minnesota Statutes, section 122A.63:
|
|
$190,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$190,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 8. Tribal
contract schools. For tribal
contract school aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.83:
|
|
$2,090,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,252,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $266,000
for 2013 and $1,824,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $285,000
for 2014 and $1,967,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this
subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are
required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 9. Early
childhood programs at tribal schools.
For early childhood family education programs at tribal contract
schools under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.83, subdivision 4:
|
|
$68,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$68,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 10. Examination
fees; teacher training and support programs. (a) For students' advanced placement
and international baccalaureate examination fees under Minnesota Statutes,
section 120B.13, subdivision 3, and the training and related costs for teachers
and other interested educators under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.13,
subdivision 1:
|
|
$4,500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$4,500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
(b) The advanced placement program
shall receive 75 percent of the appropriation each year and the international
baccalaureate program shall receive 25 percent of the appropriation each year. The department, in consultation with
representatives of the advanced placement and international baccalaureate
programs selected by the Advanced Placement Advisory Council and the Minnesota
Association of IB World Schools, respectively, shall determine the amounts of
the expenditures each year for examination fees and training and support
programs for each program.
(c) Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
section 120B.13, subdivision 1, at least $500,000 each year is for teachers to
attend subject matter summer training programs and follow-up support workshops
approved by the advanced placement or international baccalaureate programs. The amount of the subsidy for each teacher
attending an advanced placement or international baccalaureate summer training
program or workshop shall be the same. The
commissioner shall determine the payment process and the amount of the subsidy.
(d) The commissioner shall pay all
examination fees for all students of low-income families under Minnesota
Statutes, section 120B.13, subdivision 3, and to the extent of available
appropriations shall also pay examination fees for students sitting for an advanced
placement examination, international baccalaureate examination, or both.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 11. Concurrent
enrollment program. For
concurrent enrollment programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.091:
|
|
$2,000,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,000,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
If
the appropriation is insufficient, the commissioner must proportionately reduce
the aid payment to each district.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 12. Collaborative
urban educator. For the
collaborative urban educator grant program:
|
|
$776,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$776,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
$224,000 each year is for the
Southeast Asian teacher program at Concordia University, St. Paul;
$184,000 each year is for the collaborative educator program at the University
of St. Thomas; $184,000 each year is for the Center for Excellence in
Urban Teaching at Hamline University; and $184,000 each year is for East
African teacher educator activities at Augsburg College.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Each institution shall prepare for the
legislature, by January 15 of each year, a detailed report regarding the funds
used. The report must include the number
of teachers prepared as well as the diversity for each cohort of teachers
produced.
Subd. 13. ServeMinnesota
program. For funding
ServeMinnesota programs under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124D.37 to 124D.45:
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
A grantee organization may provide
health and child care coverage to the dependents of each participant enrolled
in a full-time ServeMinnesota program to the extent such coverage is not
otherwise available.
Subd. 14. Student
organizations. For student
organizations:
|
|
$725,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$725,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
$45,695 each year is for student
organizations serving health occupations (HOSA).
$42,830 each year is for student
organizations serving service occupations (HERO).
$100,130 each year is for student
organizations serving trade and industry occupations (Skills USA, secondary and
postsecondary).
$95,355 each year is for student
organizations serving business occupations (BPA, secondary and postsecondary).
$149,790 each year is for student
organizations serving agriculture occupations (FFA, PAS).
$142,150 each year is for student
organizations serving family and consumer science occupations (FCCLA).
$108,725 each year is for student
organizations serving marketing occupations (DECA and DECA collegiate).
$40,325 each year is for the Minnesota
Foundation for Student Organizations.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 15. Early
childhood literacy programs. For
early childhood literacy programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 119A.50,
subdivision 3:
|
|
$4,125,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$4,125,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
Up to $4,125,000 each year is
for leveraging federal and private funding to support AmeriCorps members
serving in the Minnesota reading corps program established by ServeMinnesota,
including costs associated with the training and teaching of early literacy
skills to children age three to grade 3 and the evaluation of the impact of the
program under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124D.38, subdivision 2, and 124D.42,
subdivision 6.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 16. Minnesota
math corps program. For the
Minnesota math corps program under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.42,
subdivision 9:
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any unexpended balance in the first year
does not cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 17. Minnesota
Principals' Academy. For a
grant to the University of Minnesota, College of Education and Human
Development, for the operation of the Minnesota Principals' Academy:
|
|
$235,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$215,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
The base appropriation for this program for fiscal year 2016 and later
is $250,000.
Subd. 18. Regional
centers of excellence. For
regional centers of excellence under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.101,
subdivision 4:
|
|
$1,500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,000,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The base for the regional centers of
excellence in fiscal years 2016 and 2017 is $4,500,000 each year.
Subd. 19. School
Climate Center. For the
School Climate Center under Minnesota Statutes, section 127A.052:
|
|
$500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 20. Site
decision-making grant program. For
site decision-making grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.04,
subdivision 2, paragraph (f):
|
|
$200,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
An education site having a written achievement contract under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.04, subdivision 4, agreed to by the school board and the education site, may apply to the commissioner of education for a two-year grant not to exceed $10 per resident pupil unit at the site in the 2012-2013 school year. Each participating education site and its school board that are the parties to the achievement contract must report annually to the commissioner, in the form and manner determined by the commissioner, on the progress and success of the education site in achieving student or contract goals or other performance expectations or measures contained in the achievement contract. The commissioner must include the substance and an analysis of these reports in the next statewide report under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.04, subdivision 5, clause (3), evaluating the effectiveness of site management agreements in redesigning learning programs and broadening the definition of student achievement. Any unexpended funds do not cancel but are available in fiscal year 2015."
Page 113, delete section 6 and insert:
"Sec. 6. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department. The sums indicated in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education for the
fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Charter school building lease aid. For building lease aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.11, subdivision 4:
|
|
$54,484,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$59,533,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$6,819,000 for 2013 and $47,665,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$7,502,000 for 2014 and $52,031,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds."
Page 138, delete section 28 and insert:
"Sec. 28. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Special
education; regular. For
special education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.75:
|
|
$910,153,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$959,018,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$118,232,000 for 2013 and $791,921,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$124,654,000 for 2014 and $834,364,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Aid
for children with disabilities. For
aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.75, subdivision 3, for children with
disabilities placed in residential facilities within the district boundaries
for whom no district of residence can be determined:
|
|
$1,655,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,752,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
If the appropriation for either year is insufficient,
the appropriation for the other year is available.
Subd. 4. Travel
for home-based services. For
aid for teacher travel for home-based services under Minnesota Statutes,
section 125A.75, subdivision 1:
|
|
$345,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$355,000
|
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$45,000 for 2013 and $300,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $47,000
for 2014 and $308,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Special
education; excess costs. For
excess cost aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.79, subdivision 7:
|
|
$118,639,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$121,919,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$42,030,000 for 2013 and $76,609,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$43,211,000 for 2014 and $78,708,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 6. Court-placed
special education revenue. For
reimbursing serving school districts for unreimbursed eligible expenditures
attributable to children placed in the serving school district by court action
under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.79, subdivision 4:
|
|
$54,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$55,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 7. Special
education out-of-state tuition. For
special education out-of-state tuition according to Minnesota Statutes, section
125A.79, subdivision 8:
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015" |
Page 142, delete section 5 and insert:
"Sec. 5. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Health
and safety revenue. For
health and safety aid according to Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.57,
subdivision 5:
|
|
$463,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$434,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $26,000
for 2013 and $437,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $68,000
for 2014 and $366,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this
subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are
required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Debt
service equalization. For
debt service aid according to Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.53, subdivision
6:
|
|
$19,083,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$25,046,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,397,000 for 2013 and $16,686,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,626,000 for 2014 and $22,420,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 4. Alternative
facilities bonding aid. For
alternative facilities bonding aid, according to Minnesota Statutes, section
123B.59, subdivision 1:
|
|
$19,287,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$19,287,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,623,000 for 2013 and $16,664,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,623,000 for 2014 and $16,664,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Equity
in telecommunications access. For
equity in telecommunications access:
|
|
$3,750,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,750,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
If the appropriation amount is
insufficient, the commissioner shall reduce the reimbursement rate in Minnesota
Statutes, section 125B.26, subdivisions 4 and 5, and the revenue for fiscal
years 2014 and 2015 shall be prorated.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 6. Deferred
maintenance aid. For deferred
maintenance aid, according to Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.591, subdivision
4:
|
|
$3,564,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,731,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$456,000 for 2013 and $3,108,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$489,000 for 2014 and $3,242,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds."
Page 150, delete section 18 and insert:
"Sec. 18. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. School
lunch. For school lunch aid
according to Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.111, and Code of Federal
Regulations, title 7, section 210.17:
|
|
$13,513,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$13,763,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 3. School
breakfast. For traditional
school breakfast aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.1158:
|
|
$5,711,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$6,022,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 4. Kindergarten
milk. For kindergarten milk
aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.118:
|
|
$1,039,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,049,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 5. Summer
food service replacement aid. For
summer food service replacement aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.119:
|
|
$150,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$150,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 6. Basic
system support. For basic
system support grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 134.355:
|
|
$13,570,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$13,570,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$1,845,000 for 2013 and $11,725,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$1,845,000 for 2014 and $11,725,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 7. Multicounty,
multitype library systems. For
grants under Minnesota Statutes, sections 134.353 and 134.354, to multicounty,
multitype library systems:
|
|
$1,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$176,000 for 2013 and $1,124,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$176,000 for 2014 and $1,124,000 for 2015.
The
appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and
future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 8. Electronic
library for Minnesota. For
statewide licenses to online databases selected in cooperation with the
Minnesota Office of Higher Education for school media centers, public
libraries, state government agency libraries, and public or private college or
university libraries:
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 9. Regional
library telecommunications aid. For
regional library telecommunications aid under Minnesota Statutes, section
134.355:
|
|
$2,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$312,000 for 2013 and $1,988,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$312,000 for 2014 and $1,988,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds."
Page 158, delete section 7 and insert:
"Sec. 7. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. School
readiness. For revenue for
school readiness programs under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124D.15 and
124D.16:
|
|
$10,095,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$10,159,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$1,372,000 for 2013 and $8,723,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $1,372,000
for 2014 and $8,787,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Early
childhood family education aid. For
early childhood family education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section
124D.135:
|
|
$22,078,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$22,425,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$3,008,000 for 2013 and $19,070,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$3,001,000 for 2014 and $19,424,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 4. Health
and developmental screening aid. For
health and developmental screening aid under Minnesota Statutes, sections
121A.17 and 121A.19:
|
|
$3,421,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,344,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $474,000
for 2013 and $2,947,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $463,000
for 2014 and $2,881,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Head
Start program. For Head Start
programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 119A.52:
|
|
$22,171,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$20,100,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
For the fiscal year 2014 appropriation
only, the lesser of 50 percent of the actual loss of revenue to sequestration
or $2,071,000 must be used to replace a portion of the federal funds lost to
sequestration and must be distributed proportionate to the loss among all
programs.
Subd. 6. Educate
parents partnership. For the
educate parents partnership under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.129:
|
|
$49,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$49,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 7. Kindergarten
entrance assessment initiative and intervention program. For the kindergarten entrance
assessment initiative and intervention program under Minnesota Statutes,
section 124D.162:
|
|
$281,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$281,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 8. Early
childhood education scholarships. For
transfer to the Office of Early Learning for early learning scholarships under
Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.143:
|
|
$25,000,000 |
. . . . . |
2014 |
|
|
$31,000,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
Up to $950,000 each year is for
administration of this program.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
The base for this program is $52,000,000
for fiscal year 2016 and $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and later.
Subd. 9. Parent-child
home program. For a grant for
a parent-child home program:
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The grant must be used for an
evidence-based and research-validated early childhood literacy and school
readiness program for children ages 16 months to four years. Any unexpended balance in the first year does
not cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 10. Community
education aid. For community
education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.20:
|
|
$935,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,056,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $118,000
for 2013 and $817,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $128,000
for 2014 and $928,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 11. Adults
with disabilities program aid. For
adults with disabilities programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.56:
|
|
$710,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$710,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $96,000
for 2013 and $614,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $96,000
for 2014 and $614,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 12. Hearing-impaired
adults. For programs for
hearing-impaired adults under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.57:
|
|
$70,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$70,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 13. School-age
care revenue. For extended
day aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.22:
|
|
$1,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $0 for
2013 and $1,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $0 for
2014 and $1,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are
subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 14. Adult basic education aid. For adult basic education aid under
Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.531:
|
|
$47,005,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$48,356,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$6,284,000 for 2013 and $40,721,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$6,409,000 for 2014 and $41,947,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 15.
|
|
$125,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
|
$125,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015"
|
Page 160, line 31, delete section 1 and insert:
"Section 1. APPROPRIATIONS;
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. Unless
otherwise indicated, the sums indicated in this section are appropriated from
the general fund to the Department of Education for the fiscal years
designated.
Subd. 2. Department. (a) For the Department of Education:
|
|
$19,214,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$19,386,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not cancel
but is available in the second year.
(b) $260,000 each year is for the
Minnesota Children's Museum.
(c) $41,000 each year is for the
Minnesota Academy of Science.
(d) $50,000 each year is for the Duluth
Children's Museum.
(e) $618,000 each year is for the Board
of Teaching. Any balance in the first
year does not cancel but is available in the second year.
(f) $167,000 each year is for the Board
of School Administrators. Any balance in
the first year does not cancel but is available in the second year.
(g) The expenditures of federal grants
and aids as shown in the biennial budget document and its supplements are
approved and appropriated and shall be spent as indicated.
(h)
None of the amounts appropriated under this subdivision may be used for
Minnesota's Washington, D. C. office.
(i) The commissioner must report to the
education committees of the legislature on the effects of federal sequestration
by July 1, 2014.
Subd. 3. Licensure
by portfolio. For licensure
by portfolio:
|
|
$30,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$30,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
This appropriation is from the educator licensure portfolio account of the special revenue fund."
Page 161, delete sections 2 and 3 and insert:
"Sec. 2. APPROPRIATIONS;
MINNESOTA STATE ACADEMIES.
The sums indicated in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Minnesota State Academies for the
Deaf and the Blind for the fiscal years designated:
|
|
$11,897,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$11,910,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
$85,000 of the fiscal year 2014 appropriation
is for costs associated with upgrading kitchen facilities. The funds for kitchen upgrades may be
expended in fiscal year 2014 or fiscal year 2015. Any balance in the first year does not cancel
but is available in the second year.
Sec. 3. APPROPRIATIONS;
PERPICH CENTER FOR ARTS EDUCATION.
The sums in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Perpich Center for Arts Education for
the fiscal years designated:
|
|
$6,786,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$6,848,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
The Perpich Center must report to the education committees of the legislature by January 15, 2014, on its equipment and facility needs for future years."
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Woodard moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 8, delete subdivisions 18 and 19
Page 15, line 1, delete "25,000,000" and insert "28,250,000"
Page 15, line 2, delete "31,000,000" and insert "34,179,000"
Page 16, line 27, delete "19,214,000" and insert "18,772,000"
Page 16, line 28, delete "19,386,000" and insert "18,944,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment
and the roll was called. There were 62
yeas and
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Quam moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 16, line 30, delete everything after "(b)" and insert "$1,000,000 each year is for grants to children's museums located in Minnesota. A nonprofit organization operating a children's museum may apply for a grant under this paragraph in the form and manner specified by the commissioner."
Page 16, delete line 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 59 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
McDonald moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 8, delete subdivisions 18 and 19
Page 11, after line 32, insert:
"Page 143, line 11, strike the first comma and delete "reduced-price," and after "students" insert "and 52 cents for each reduced-price lunch served to students""
Page 12, line 6, delete "13,513,000" and insert "16,969,000"
Page 12, line 7, delete "13,763,000" and insert "17,219,000"
Page 16, line 27, delete "19,214,000" and insert "18,508,000"
Page 16, line 28, delete "19,386,000" and insert "18,680,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 66 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Myhra moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 6, lines 3 and 4, delete "2,000,000" and insert "5,000,000"
Page 17, after line 9, insert:
"(j) This appropriation is reduced by $3,000,000 per year."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 62 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Hortman to the Chair.
Myhra moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 7, lines 13 and 14, delete "4,125,000" and insert "4,625,000"
Page 7, line 15, delete "$4,125,000" and insert "$4,625,000"
Page 7, lines 23 and 24, delete "250,000" and insert "500,000"
Page 15, line 8, delete "$250,000" and insert "500,000"
Page 15, line 9, delete "$250,000" and insert "500,000"
Page 17, after line 9, insert:
"(j) This appropriation is reduced by $1,000,000 per year."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 63 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Wills moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 52, line 9, after "section" insert "and section 124D.861"
Page 77, line 22, after "students" insert ", including those components of a board's strategic plan under section 126C.101, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), providing direct services to students"
Page 83, after line 15, insert:
"Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.862, subdivision 7, paragraph (a), this appropriation may be used to provide direct services to students under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.101."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 76, delete section 19 and insert:
"Sec. 19. [124.862]
ACHIEVEMENT GAP ELIMINATION REVENUE.
Subdivision 1. Eligibility. A school district is eligible for
achievement gap elimination revenue under this section if the district has a
biennial plan consistent with section 124D.861 submitted and approved by the
department.
Subd. 2. Achievement
gap elimination revenue. (a)
An eligible district's initial achievement gap elimination revenue equals the
sum of (1) $350 times the district's adjusted pupil units for that year times
the ratio of the district's enrollment of protected students for the previous
year to total enrollment for the previous total school year, and (2) the greater of zero or 65 percent of the
difference between the district's integration revenue for fiscal year 2013
and the district's achievement gap elimination revenue for fiscal year 2014
under clause (1).
(b) In each year, 0.2 percent of each
district's initial achievement gap elimination revenue is transferred to the
department for the oversight and accountability activities required under this
section and section 124D.861.
(c) A district that did not meet its
achievement gap elimination goals established in section 124D.861 for the previous biennium must have its initial
achievement gap elimination revenue reduced by five percent for the current
year.
(d) Any revenue saved by the reductions
in paragraph (c) must be proportionately reallocated on a per-pupil basis to
all districts that met their achievement gap elimination goals in the previous
biennium.
Subd. 3. Achievement
gap elimination aid. A
district's achievement gap elimination aid equals 70 percent of its achievement
gap elimination revenue.
Subd. 4. Achievement
gap elimination levy. A
district's achievement gap elimination levy equals the difference between its
achievement gap elimination revenue and its achievement gap elimination aid. For Special School District No. 1,
Minneapolis, Independent School District No. 625, St. Paul, and
Independent School District No. 709, Duluth, 100 percent of the levy
certified in this subdivision is shifted into the prior calendar year for
purposes of sections 123B.75, subdivision 5, and 127A.441.
Subd. 5. Incentive
revenue. An eligible school
district's maximum incentive revenue equals $10 per adjusted pupil unit. In order to receive this revenue, a district
must be implementing a voluntary plan to reduce racial enrollment disparities
through intradistrict and interdistrict activities, developed with input from
parents and the community, that have been approved as part of the district's
achievement and integration plan. A
district qualifies for incentive revenue if the district demonstrates an
alternative plan, such as community or neighborhood based schools aimed at
reducing the achievement gap.
Subd. 6. Revenue
reserved. Achievement gap
elimination revenue received under this section must be reserved and used only
for the programs authorized in subdivision 7.
Subd. 7. Revenue
uses. (a) At least 80 percent
of the district's achievement gap elimination revenue received under this
section must be used for programs including, but not limited to: innovative learning environments, school
enrollment choices, prioritizing funding for teachers, paraprofessionals, and
tutors providing direct instruction, and other approved programs providing
direct instructional services to students.
(b) Up to 20 percent of the revenue may
be used for paraprofessional development and staff development activities and
placement services.
(c) No more than ten percent of the
total amount of revenue may be spent on administrative services.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for revenue for fiscal year 2014 and later."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Woodard moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, delete "$350" and insert "$235"
Page 1, line 11, delete everything after "(2)"
Page 1, delete lines 12 and 13 and insert "$82.50 times the district's adjusted pupil units."
Page 2, delete subdivision 5
Renumber the subdivisions in sequence
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 62 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 74, delete section 18, and insert:
"Sec. 18. [124D.861]
ACHIEVEMENT GAP ELIMINATION PROGRAM.
Subdivision
1. Program
to eliminate the academic achievement and opportunity gap. The "Achievement Gap Elimination
Program" established to improve the academic achievement of all students
and eliminate disparities in academic achievement among the nine student
categories identified under the federal 2001 No Child Left Behind Act in
Minnesota public schools. The program
must serve students of varying racial, ethnic, and economic backgrounds, taking
into account unique geographic and demographic particularities affecting
students, schools, and districts including race, neighborhood locations and
characteristics, grades, socioeconomic status, academic performance, and
language barriers. Eligible districts
must use the revenue under section 124D.862 to improve the academic achievement
of all students and eliminate disparities in academic achievement among student
subgroups through:
(1) school choice programs, innovative
academic instruction, and best teaching practices;
(2) opportunity programs proven to
increase students' access to academic rigor and focused on college and career
readiness;
(3) family engagement programs that
promote involvement in students' academic life and success;
(4) professional development focused on
improving students' academic achievement;
(5) increased diversity of teachers and
administrators achieved through teacher and administrator recruitment and
retention policies; and
(6) other programs proven through data
to improve students' academic achievement.
Subd. 2. Plan
components. (a) The school
board of each eligible district must develop and implement a comprehensive plan
consistent, with subdivision 1, containing specific district and school goals
for eliminating the disparities in students' academic achievement and promoting
students' academic success.
(b) Among other requirements, an
eligible district must implement a cost-effective, research-based intervention
that includes formative assessment practices to eliminate the disparity in
student academic achievement between the highest and lowest performing racial
and ethnic categories of students as measured by student demonstration of
proficiency on state reading and math assessments.
(c) Eligible districts may collaborate
in creating efficiencies and eliminating the duplication of programs and
services under this section.
Subd. 3. Biennial
progress; budget process. (a)
To receive revenue under section 124D.862, the school board of an eligible
district must hold at least one formal hearing by March 1 in the year preceding
the current biennium to report to the public its progress in realizing the
goals identified in its plan. At the
hearing, the board must provide the public with longitudinal data demonstrating
district and school progress in eliminating the academic achievement gap,
consistent with its plan and the measures in paragraph (b). The district also must submit to the
commissioner by March 1 in the year preceding the current biennium a detailed
biennial budget for continuing to implement its plan and the commissioner must
review and approve or disapprove the budget by June 1 of that year.
(b) The longitudinal data required
under paragraph (a) must be based on one or more of the following measures:
(1) the number of world
language proficiency or high achievement certificates awarded under section
120B.022, subdivision 1, paragraphs (b) and (c);
(2) student growth
and progress toward proficiency in reading or mathematics as defined under
section 120B.299;
(3) adequate yearly progress under section 120B.35,
subdivision 2;
(4) preparation for postsecondary academic and career
opportunities under section 120B.35, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (1);
(5) rigorous coursework completed under section 120B.35,
subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (2); or
(6) school safety and students' engagement and
connection at school under section 120B.35, subdivision 3, paragraph (d).
Subd. 4.
Evaluation. The commissioner must evaluate the
efficacy of district plans in eliminating the disparity in student academic
achievement among all racial and ethnic categories of students and report the
commissioner's findings to the K-12
education committees of the legislature by February 1 every fourth year
beginning February 1, 2017.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2014 and later."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Erickson,
S., amendment and the roll was called.
There were 60 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Myhra moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 154, line 19, after the period, insert "Prior to July 1, 2017, the director must not vary scholarship amounts based on a program's star rating. After July 1, 2017,"
Page 154, line 21, after "(g)" insert "except the director may set aside the schedule in those communities or regions with limited rated program options"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Myhra
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 140, delete sections 2 and 3
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes