STATE OF
MINNESOTA
NINETY-FIRST
SESSION - 2019
_____________________
FORTY-THIRD
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, April 29, 2019
The House of Representatives convened at 9:00
a.m. and was called to order by Liz Olson, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Lauren
Baske Davis, First United Church of Christ, Northfield, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The Speaker assumed the Chair.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
A quorum was present.
Freiberg was
excused until 12:00 noon. Kresha was
excused until 12:50 p.m. Daudt was
excused until 8:15 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the
Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
INTRODUCTION
AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following
House Files were introduced:
Her introduced:
H. F. No. 2859, A bill for an act relating to human services; providing a grant for a culturally specific food shelf in the east metro; appropriating money.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Her introduced:
H. F. No. 2860, A bill for an act relating to education finance; appropriating money for a grant to an American Indian youth enrichment program.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Drazkowski, Bahr, Munson, Miller and Quam introduced:
H. F. No. 2861, A bill for an act relating to taxation; eliminating income and business taxes and replacing the sales tax with a fair tax; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 297A.61, subdivisions 2, 7, 24; 297A.62, subdivisions 1, 1a; 297A.63, by adding a subdivision; 297A.66, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 297A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 290.01, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 4, 4a, 4c, 5, 5a, 5b, 6, 7, 7a, 7b, 8, 8a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 29, 29a, 30, 31; 290.0131, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14; 290.0132, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26; 290.0133, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14; 290.0134; 290.0135; 290.0136; 290.0137; 290.014; 290.015; 290.02; 290.03; 290.032, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 290.04; 290.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 8; 290.06, subdivisions 1, 2c, 2d, 2g, 2h, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 37, 38; 290.067, subdivisions 1, 2b, 3, 4; 290.0671, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6a, 7; 290.0672, subdivisions 1, 2; 290.0674, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 4, 5; 290.0675, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 290.0677; 290.0679; 290.068, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6a, 7; 290.0681, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 290.0682; 290.0684; 290.0685; 290.0686; 290.0692, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 290.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 7; 290.0802; 290.081; 290.091, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 290.0921, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 6, 8; 290.0922, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 290.093; 290.095, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 11; 290.10; 290.17, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 290.172; 290.191, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12; 290.20; 290.21, subdivisions 1, 4; 290.22; 290.26, subdivision 6; 290.281, subdivision 1; 290.30; 290.31, subdivisions 1, 27; 290.311, subdivision 1; 290.32; 290.34, subdivisions 1, 2; 290.36; 290.371, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 290.431; 290.432; 290.48, subdivision 10; 290.491; 290.62; 290.92, subdivisions 1, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 5a, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30; 290.9201, subdivisions 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 11; 290.923, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11; 290.9705, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 290.9725; 290.9726, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 290.9727; 290.9728; 290.9729; 290.9741; 290.9742; 297A.61, subdivisions 3, 4, 6, 10, 12, 13, 16a, 16b, 16c, 17, 17a, 17b, 18, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 58; 297A.62, subdivision 3; 297A.63, subdivision 2; 297A.64; 297A.65; 297A.67, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7a, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13a, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36; 297A.68, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35a, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45; 297A.69, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7; 297A.70, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9a, 10, 11, 11a, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20; 297A.71, subdivisions 1, 3, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 22, 23, 34, 35, 40, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50; 297A.75,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 297A.825; 297D.01; 297D.02; 297D.03; 297D.04; 297D.05; 297D.06; 297D.07; 297D.08; 297D.085; 297D.09; 297D.10; 297D.11; 297D.12; 297D.13; 297F.01, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9a, 10, 10a, 10b, 11, 12, 13, 13a, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21a, 22, 22a, 23; 297F.02; 297F.03; 297F.031; 297F.04; 297F.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7; 297F.06; 297F.07; 297F.08, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8a, 9, 10, 12, 13; 297F.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10; 297F.10, subdivisions 1, 2; 297F.11; 297F.12; 297F.13; 297F.14; 297F.15, subdivisions 9, 10; 297F.17; 297F.18; 297F.185; 297F.19, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9; 297F.20; 297F.21, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297F.23; 297F.24; 297F.25; 297G.01; 297G.02; 297G.03, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 297G.031; 297G.032; 297G.04; 297G.05; 297G.06; 297G.07; 297G.08; 297G.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 297G.10; 297G.11; 297G.12; 297G.13; 297G.14, subdivision 9; 297G.16; 297G.17; 297G.18, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; 297G.19; 297G.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 297G.22; 297H.01; 297H.02; 297H.03; 297H.04, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 297H.05; 297H.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297H.07; 297H.08; 297H.09; 297H.10, subdivision 1; 297H.11; 297H.115; 297H.12; 297H.13, subdivisions 1, 2, 5; 297I.01; 297I.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14; 297I.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297I.10, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 297I.11, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297I.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12; 297I.20; 297I.25; 297I.30, subdivisions 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; 297I.35; 297I.40; 297I.60, subdivisions 1, 2; 297I.65; 297I.70; 297I.75; 297I.80; 297I.85; 297I.90; 462D.01; 462D.02; 462D.03; 462D.04; 462D.05; 462D.06.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Winkler moved that the House recess
subject to the call of the Chair. The
motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by Speaker pro tempore Halverson.
REPORT
FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES
AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Winkler from the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Wednesday, May 1,
2019 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the
following bills:
H. F. Nos. 1733 and 2032.
CALENDAR FOR
THE DAY
TAKEN FROM
TABLE
Becker-Finn moved that
H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, be taken from
the table. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 1555, the first
engrossment, as amended, was again reported to the House.
Grossell moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 105, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 73. [169.975] OPERATION OF LIGHT RAIL
TRANSIT VEHICLE.
Subdivision 1.
Consent to testing. Any person who drives, operates, or is
in physical control of a light rail transit vehicle consents to a chemical test
of that person's blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the
presence of alcohol, a controlled substance or its metabolite, or an
intoxicating substance. The test must be
administered pursuant to law at the direction of a peace officer.
Subd. 2.
Report of testing. The results of a test administered
pursuant to this section must be reported to the commissioner, the chair of the
Metropolitan Council, and the authority having responsibility for prosecution
of criminal offenses for the jurisdiction in which the acts occurred if the
test results indicate the presence of any amount of alcohol.
Subd. 3.
Crime. Any person who drives, operates, or is
in physical control of a light rail transit vehicle when the person's body
contains physical evidence of the consumption of alcohol is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Grossell
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hamilton was excused between the hours of
11:15 a.m. and 12:30 p.m.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 132, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 116. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 473.4056, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Minimum standards. Standards adopted under this section must include, but are not limited to:
(1) two dedicated spaces for wheelchair users in each car;
(2) seating for a companion adjacent to at least two
wheelchair-dedicated spaces; and
(3) further
specifications that meet or exceed the standards established in the Americans
with Disabilities Act; and
(4) a camera that is capable of recording the light rail transit vehicle operator and the interior of the vehicle in vicinity of the operator.
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies for light rail transit vehicles procured on and after August 1, 2019. This section applies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington."
Amend the title accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 53 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 137, after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 125. BUS
RAPID TRANSIT TRANSITION.
(a) By October 1, 2020, the Metropolitan
Council must transition any corridor and project planning for light rail
transit to planning for bus rapid transit.
The requirements of this section include but are not limited to corridor
analysis or studies, feasibility studies, and project development.
(b) This section does not apply to a
segment of a light rail transit line or line extension in which the project
formally entered the engineering phase of the Federal Transit Administration's
"New Starts" capital investment grant program prior to January 1,
2019.
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Lucero moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 88, after line 12, insert:
"Sec. 51. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.035, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Light
rail transit. (a) Except for
those provisions which by their nature cannot reasonably apply to light rail
transit vehicles, every person operating a light rail transit vehicle has the
rights and duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle pursuant to
sections 169.06; 169.09; 169.14; 169.15; 169.20; 169.202, subdivision 2;
169.21, subdivision 2; 169.444; and 169.475.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of
this subdivision, a person operating a light rail transit vehicle that is
subject to regulation by the United States Department of Transportation must
comply with the more stringent or additional requirement imposed by federal
regulation.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to violations committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Lucero
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Heinrich moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 33, delete "Passenger"
Page 5, line 5, before the period, insert ", and for any additional state rail safety inspection program inspectors under Minnesota Statutes, section 219.015"
Page 119, line 26, after the period, insert "Subject to paragraph (c),"
Page 119, after line 30, insert:
"(c) The assessment under this subdivision must exclude any costs that are for more than four positions under the inspection program. Excluded costs include travel, equipment, training, and ongoing duties related to the additional positions."
Page 119, line 31, strike "(c)" and insert "(d)"
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Bahr moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6, delete lines 4 to 7
Page 137, delete section 126
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Correct the title numbers accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Bahr
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6, line 6, delete "user fee" and insert "tax"
Page 137, line 19, delete "USER FEE" and insert "TAX"
Page 137, lines 21, 22, 26, and 28, delete "user fee" and insert "tax"
Page 138, lines 2, 4, 11, and 13, delete "user fee" and insert "tax"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Nash moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 33, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 239.7511, is amended to read:
239.7511
GAS TAX SIGN ON PETROLEUM DISPENSER.
(a) The director must ensure that signs having 12-point font or greater are affixed on retail petroleum dispensers as follows:
(1) for regular or premium gasoline, a sign that reads: "The price for each gallon of gasoline includes the current state gasoline tax of 28.5 cents per gallon and federal gasoline tax of 18.4 cents per gallon. Revenue from the state fuel tax may be used only for roads and bridges, according to the Minnesota Constitution. Due to the actions of the Minnesota legislature, by January 2022, Minnesotans will pay at least 48.5 cents per gallon in state gas tax, which is currently the fourth highest gas tax rate in the nation. This will then increase annually by an automatic inflation factor to help build One Minnesota."; and
(2) for diesel fuel, a sign that reads: "The price for each gallon of diesel fuel includes the current state gasoline tax of 28.5 cents per gallon and federal gasoline tax of 24.4 cents per gallon. Revenue from the state fuel tax may be used only for roads and bridges, according to the Minnesota Constitution. Due to the actions of the Minnesota legislature, by January 2022, Minnesotans will pay at least 48.5 cents per gallon in state gas tax, which is currently the fourth highest gas tax rate in the nation. This will then increase annually by an automatic inflation factor to help build One Minnesota."
(b) The director must distribute the signs under this section to the owner or operator of retail petroleum dispensers. To the extent possible, the director must coordinate the distribution of signs with other duties the director may have involving retail petroleum dispensers.
(c) If the amount of the gasoline tax described in paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), changes, the director must distribute revised signs to reflect the updated gasoline tax amounts within 12 calendar months of the change.
(d) The director is prohibited from assessing any penalty, fine, or fee on the owner or operator of a retail petroleum dispenser that has a missing, destroyed, defaced, or otherwise damaged gas tax sign."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Nash moved to amend the Nash amendment to H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 20, insert:
"(b) In addition to the text specified in paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), each sign must include a map of Minnesota and the neighboring states that identifies the current corresponding tax rate, in cents per gallon, in each state."
Page 1, line 21, strike "(b)" and insert "(c)"
Page 2, line 1, strike "(c)" and insert "(d)" and strike "gasoline" and insert "Minnesota motor fuels"
Page 2, line 2, strike "gasoline" and after "amounts" insert ", including for neighboring states,"
Page 2, line 4, strike "(d)" and insert "(e)"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Nash
amendment to the Nash amendment and the roll was called. There were 55 yeas and 75 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Nash
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Mekeland moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 34, after line 20, insert:
"(f) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) to (e), the rates established under this subdivision are optional except that the gasoline excise tax imposed at the rates of (1) 17.75 cents per gallon for E85, (2) 14.25 cents per gallon for M85, and (3) 25 cents per gallon for all other gasoline. The optional additional tax must be collected if the consumer consents to the additional tax. At the point of sale of gasoline to a consumer, the retailer must ask the consumer if the consumer wishes to pay an additional tax and must identify the current additional tax amount. If the consumer chooses to pay the additional tax, the retailer must collect the additional tax and remit it quarterly to the commissioner of revenue. The commissioner must deposit the revenue from the additional gasoline excise tax into the highway user tax distribution fund."
Page 34, line 21, delete "(f)" and insert "(g)"
Page 34, line 23, delete "(g)" and insert "(h)"
Page 34, line 27, after the period, insert "Paragraph (f) is effective July 1, 2023."
Page 36, after line 19, insert:
"(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) to (f), the rates established under this subdivision are optional except that the special fuel excise tax is imposed at the rates of (1) 18.75 cents per gallon for liquefied petroleum gas, (2) 15 cents per gallon for liquefied natural gas, and (3) $1.974 per thousand cubic feet or 30 cents per gasoline equivalent for compressed natural gas. The optional additional tax must be collected if the consumer consents to the additional tax. At the point of sale of special fuel to a consumer, the retailer must ask the consumer if the consumer wishes to pay an additional tax and must identify the current additional tax amount. If the consumer chooses to pay the additional tax, the retailer must collect the additional tax and remit it quarterly to the commissioner of revenue. The commissioner must deposit the revenue from the additional special fuel excise tax into the highway user tax distribution fund."
Page 36, line 20, delete "(g)" and insert "(h)"
Page 36, line 23, delete "(h)" and insert "(i)"
Page 36, line 26, after the period, insert "Paragraph (g) is effective July 1, 2023."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 33, line 22, delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 33, line 23, delete "October" and insert "December"
Page 34, line 26, after "effective" insert "upon voter approval as provided in section 16," and delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 34, line 29, delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 34, line 31, delete "October" and insert "December"
Page 36, line 25, after "effective" insert "upon voter approval as provided in section 16," and delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 45, after line 7, insert:
"Sec. 16. MOTOR VEHICLE FUELS TAX VOTER APPROVAL.
(a) The amendments contained in sections 8 and 9 must be
submitted for approval by the voters at the 2020 state general election. The question submitted must be:
"Should the state tax on motor fuels be increased
by 20 cents per gallon for gasoline and diesel and increased proportionally for
other types of fuel?
|
|
Yes ………………… |
|
|
No …………………" |
(b) To the extent practicable, the question required
under paragraph (a) must be placed on the state general election ballot, and
the results canvassed, in the manner provided by law for state constitutional
amendments. The title of the ballot
question must be "Motor Fuels Tax Increase."
(c) The secretary of state must absorb costs associated
with implementation of this section.
Sec. 17. CONDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS REDUCTIONS.
If the amendments contained in sections 8 and 9 do not take effect, the commissioner of management and budget, in consultation with the commissioner of transportation and fiscal staff of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance, must accordingly reduce the relevant appropriations in article 1, section 2, from each of the affected funds. As necessary, the commissioner of management and budget must make reductions in proportional amounts based on the percentage of each applicable appropriation in comparison to total applicable appropriations, provided that a reduction must not reduce the appropriation to below the base appropriation for that fiscal year. The commissioner of management and budget must notify the chairs, ranking minority members, and staff of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance of the specific reductions and amounts."
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Poppe was excused between the hours
of 12:20 p.m. and 1:40 p.m.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Koznick moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, line 14, before the period, insert ", but excluding a county identified under paragraph (c)"
Page 42, after line 19, insert:
"(c) The transportation sales tax
under this section is not imposed in a county that:
(1) imposes the sales and use tax under
section 297A.993, subdivision 1, at a rate that is below the maximum rate
authorized in that section; or
(2) meets the requirements under clause (1) on the effective date of this section and it is within 15 years of the date that the county adjusted the rate of the sales and use tax under section 297A.993, subdivision 1, to the maximum rate authorized in that section."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Koznick
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, line 12, before the second "the" insert "and subject to the approval in paragraph (c),"
Page 42, after line 19, insert:
"(c) The council must not impose the transportation sales tax unless a majority of the voters voting on the question submitted at the 2020 general election vote in favor of imposition of the tax."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Lucero moved to amend the Runbeck amendment to H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, delete line 6 and insert "statutory and home rule charter cities located within the metropolitan area, by resolution, approve"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
McDonald was excused between the
hours of 1:30 p.m. and 8:35 p.m.
The question was taken on the Lucero
amendment to the Runbeck amendment and the roll was called. There were 57 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 37, line 7, delete "75" and insert "60"
Page 37, line 9, reinstate the stricken "Minnesota state transportation fund; and" and delete "small cities assistance"
Page 37, line 10, before "account" insert "(4) 15 percent to the small cities assistance"
Page 37, line 19, delete "0.2" and insert "0.04"
Page 37, line 20, delete "0.35" and insert "0.08"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The Speaker called Olson to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 76 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Robbins
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 36, line 30, delete everything after "section" and insert a period
Page 37, line 6, after "fund" insert "such that the first $32,000,000 each year is allocated to the highway user tax distribution fund, and the remaining funds are distributed"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
West moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 28, after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 168.013, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 23. Tax
adjustment. (a) For purposes
of this subdivision, "qualifying owner" means the owner of a motor
vehicle subject to the registration tax under subdivision 1a who meets any of
the following requirements:
(1) had a household income equal to or
less than 185 percent of federal poverty level income in the previous calendar
year;
(2) claimed the Minnesota working
family credit under section 290.0671 in the preceding taxable year; or
(3) is able to document a child's
current participation in the free and reduced-price lunch program or Child and
Adult Care Food Program, National School Lunch Act, United States Code, title
42, sections 1751 and 1766; the Food Distribution Program on Indian
Reservations, Food and Nutrition Act, United States Code, title 7, sections
2011-2036; Head Start under the federal Improving Head Start for School
Readiness Act of 2007; Minnesota family investment program under chapter 256J;
child care assistance programs under chapter 119B; or the supplemental
nutrition assistance program.
(b) The registration tax under
subdivision 1a due on the motor vehicle of a qualifying owner is adjusted to
0.75 multiplied by the tax amount calculated under that subdivision.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2021, and applies to taxes payable for a registration period starting on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the West
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Stephenson
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 44, line 31, delete "57" and insert "60"
Page 45, line 1, delete "34.5" and insert "31.5"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Petersburg moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, follows:
Page 24, line 10, delete "1,700,000,000" and insert "1,500,000,000"
Page 24, line 21, delete "$300,000,000" and insert "$100,000,000"
Page 24, line 25, delete "300,000,000" and insert "500,000,000"
Page 24, line 32, delete "2024" and insert "2026"
Page 25, line 23, delete "2024" and insert "2026"
Page 25, line 25, delete "2025" and insert "2027"
Page 25, line 26, delete "300,000" and insert "100,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Petersburg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 5, after line 5, insert:
|
"(f) Minnesota Rail Service Improvement |
|
5,000,000
|
|
5,000,000
|
This appropriation is from the general fund for the Minnesota rail service improvement program under Minnesota Statutes, sections 222.49 and 222.50. This is a onetime appropriation."
Page 5, line 6, delete "(f)" and insert "(g)"
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "12,336,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 40, line 29, after "DATE" insert "; EXPIRATION"
Page
40, line 30, before the period, insert "and before July 1, 2021. The changes in this section expire June 30,
2021"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Munson offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Carlson, L., raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution;
Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the Munson amendment was not in
order. Speaker pro tempore Olson ruled
the point of order well taken and the Munson amendment out of order.
Johnson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 11, delete "19,001,000" and insert "18,151,000"
Page 4, delete lines 16 to 19
Page 4, delete lines 24 to 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 5, line 17, delete "33,742,000" and insert "32,667,000" and delete "31,025,000" and insert "30,950,000"
Page 6, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 11, line 18, delete "43,834,000" and insert "42,944,000"
Page 12, delete lines 5 to 7
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "22,306,000" and delete "7,213,000" and insert "7,183,000"
Page 15, delete lines 10 to 15
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 16, line 31, delete the first "640,000" and insert "1,992,000" and delete "640,000" and insert "1,992,000"
Page 17, after line 4, insert:
"The base appropriation is $640,000 in each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023."
Page 18, line 4, delete "100,258,000" and insert "100,008,000"
Page 18, delete lines 10 to 15
Page 19, line 14, delete "36,752,000" and insert "36,485,000"
Page 19, delete lines 23 to 24 and insert "This appropriation includes money for implementation costs"
Page 19, delete lines 26 to 30
Page 46, delete section 2
Page 131, line 14, after "(a)" insert "Using existing resources,"
Page 139, delete section 127
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Johnson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Petersburg moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 11, delete "19,001,000" and insert "18,151,000"
Page 4, delete lines 16 to 19
Page 4, delete lines 24 to 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 5, line 17, delete "33,742,000" and insert "32,667,000" and delete "31,025,000" and insert "30,950,000"
Page 6, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 11, after line 2, insert:
|
"(d) Townships |
|
1,352,000
|
|
1,352,000
|
This appropriation is from the general fund for distribution to towns in the manner provided under Minnesota Statutes, section 162.081. This is a onetime appropriation."
Page 11, line 18, delete "43,834,000" and insert "42,944,000"
Page 12, delete lines 5 to 7
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "22,306,000" and delete "7,213,000" and insert "7,183,000"
Page 15, delete lines 10 to 15
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 18, line 4, delete "100,258,000" and insert "100,008,000"
Page 18, delete lines 10 to 15
Page 19, line 14, delete "36,752,000" and insert "36,485,000"
Page 19, delete lines 23 to 24 and insert "This appropriation includes money for implementation costs"
Page 19, delete lines 26 to 30
Page 46, delete section 2
Page 131, line 14, after "(a)" insert "Using existing resources,"
Page 139, delete section 127
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Speaker pro tempore Olson called Halverson
to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Petersburg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were: