Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Fireworks expansion fizzles in House

Minnesotans looking to buy some fireworks may be able to stay within the state’s borders, if a bill can still work its way through the committee process.

“Sometimes you just got to ignite the light and let it shine,” said Rep. John Kriesel (R-Cottage Grove), the sponsor of HF1774.

“Current Minnesota law allows for the use of party poppers, snappers, toy smoke devices, snakes glow worms or sparklers. This bill expands legal fireworks in Minnesota to include bottle rockets, firecrackers and other fireworks classified by the American Pyrotechnics Association as consumer fireworks,” Kriesel said. “This bill does not make cherry bombs or M-80s legal, or the consumer use of large display fireworks like you see at your community Fourth of July celebrations.”

Local governments would be permitted to charge an annual license fee to stores wanting to sell consumer fireworks, but they couldn’t, among other things, regulate structures where fireworks could be sold.

However, after more than an hour of discussion on the House floor, the bill was re-referred to the House Government Operations and Elections Committee so local units of government can weigh in on local control issues. A companion, SF1694, sponsored by Sen. Michael Jungbauer (R-East Bethel), awaits action on the Senate floor.

“Give local government units, give fire chiefs, give police chiefs … a chance to weigh in on the bill so we can find out if it’s a good idea or not, or to find out if there are restrictions that should be placed on this,” said Rep. Ryan Winkler (DFL-Golden Valley).

Supporters spoke of Minnesotans crossing into neighboring states to spend their money for fireworks.

Rep. Steve Drazkowski (R-Mazeppa) said there’s a seasonal store across the bridge from Wabasha that’s open three or four months a year “only to collect money from Minnesotans that are coming over to buy their fireworks and head back.”

Among arguments made by opponents was the dangers of fireworks, especially to children, and that fire and police chiefs have expressed fear about an expansion.

“I think this bill is just a terrible idea,” said Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL-Rochester). “What  about the personal responsibility of somebody who injures somebody else, somebody who’s a complete and total bystander, somebody whose parent didn’t agree to them using the firework? This is a ridiculously reckless bill.”

“We can’t wrap our world in bubble wrap. We can’t protect everybody,” said Rep. Larry Hosch (DFL-St. Joseph).


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

How short are the Legislature's short sessions?
The Minnesota House of Representatives in session Feb. 6, 2025. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) Rep. Ron Kresha (R-Little Falls) was ready to end the session March 25, making the motion to adjourn sine die. But not enough of his colleagues shared that sentiment, defeating ...
Stable budget outlook projects $3.7 billion surplus now, no deficit in next biennium
House Photography file photo The projected surplus for Fiscal Years 2026-27 is now higher than it was in the November estimate, and no deficit is projected for the next biennium. “Minnesota’s budge...