Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Minnesota AG's Office seeks changes to scam restitution fund

Louise Schostek testifies April 15 before the House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee in support of a bill sponsored by Rep. Liz Lee, left, that would remove deposit limits on the consumer protection restitution account. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)
Louise Schostek testifies April 15 before the House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee in support of a bill sponsored by Rep. Liz Lee, left, that would remove deposit limits on the consumer protection restitution account. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)

An account created last year to help scam victims become financially whole could receive some changes to provide funds to more people.

The Consumer Protection Restitution Account currently has $4.5 million and the Attorney General’s Office is in the process of distributing the first funds from the account, which will go to patients of a Woodbury dentist who shut down his practice without giving notice or refunds to patients.

The office has received 320 claims for restitution from the account, 76 of which have been approved for the first distribution totaling more than $1 million, according to Jason Pleggenkuhle, manager of the Consumer Protection Division at the Attorney General’s Office.

Sponsored by Rep. Liz Lee (DFL-St. Paul), HF4867 would remove the $5 million annual limit on deposits into the account. It would also implement a formula for restitution payouts that would distribute full restitution up to $50,000 and 50% of the amount over $50,000.

The House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee laid the bill over Wednesday.

Rep. Josh Heintzeman (R-Nisswa) is glad to see the deposit limit lifted, but questioned if there was a way to address the larger restitution amounts since there may be more money flowing into the account. Lee said the bill’s details are a “starting position” for discussion as it moves through the Legislature.

[MORE: AARP handout]

Account funding comes from 50% of all money recovered by the Attorney General’s Office in consumer enforcement action and restitution funds that can’t be feasibly distributed to consumers.

Minnesotans can file a complaint with the office when they are a victim of a consumer scam, which triggers the process to receive a court order for restitution and receive a distribution from the account if the defendant doesn’t have funds for restitution.

Pleggenkuhle said the office continues to attempt to collect restitution from a defendant even if restitution is paid out of the account and anything recovered would go into the restitution account.

The bill wouldn’t change the funding mechanism for the account, but it would allow the Attorney General’s Office to continue to deposit funds into the account annually without worrying about a limit, Pleggenkuhle said.

It also would set a fair formula for restitution that would allow the office to distribute money to as many consumers as possible, he said.

“Without this change, despite the fact that there might be hundreds of consumers waiting in line for restitution, consumers that have an outsized amount of loss threatened to exhaust the fund to the detriment of other consumers,” he said, pointing out that the top 10 claim amounts total $6.5 million.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Could 2026 retirements lead to record turnover in the House?
Twenty-six current Minnesota House members have announced their retirement from the chamber after the 2026 session. (House Photography file photo) In the final weeks of the legislative session, House members not seeking re-election to the body have taken a turn at gaveling in a floor session. It’s an opportunity to loo...
How short are the Legislature's short sessions?
The Minnesota House of Representatives in session Feb. 6, 2025. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) Rep. Ron Kresha (R-Little Falls) was ready to end the session March 25, making the motion to adjourn sine die. But not enough of his colleagues shared that sentiment, defeating ...