Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House lawmakers OK bill to help people retrieve property from towed vehicles

At a minimum, having a vehicle towed is an inconvenience. However, for people without a permanent address, losing that access could also mean losing everything they own – winter coats, family photographs, homework, even a loved one’s ashes.

Nearly 15 years ago, Minnesota passed a law stating indigent people have the right to retrieve contents of an impounded vehicle without charge. However, there is no penalty for violating that right.

On a 122-0 vote Thursday, the House passed HF975 sponsored by Rep. Kelly Moller (DFL-Shoreview) which would alter some procedures lot operators must follow regarding the retrieval of private property from impounded vehicles. It would also offer a remedy when rights to retrieval are improperly denied.

It now goes to the Senate.

The bill would allow the state to enforce a law that is already on the books, so there is a consequence for towing companies destroying people’s property, said Rep. John Petersburg (R-Waseca).

It would apply to nonpublic lots or those with exclusive contracts. Reasons for denial would need to be specific and put in writing.

The proposed legislation would explicitly allow a vehicle owner to file a civil suit and, if successful, could provide injunctive relief, compensation for lost property, attorney’s fees and additional damages of $1,000. Any civil action would need to be taken within 12 months.

Any vehicle owner would be permitted to retrieve identifications, medicine and medical equipment.

Related Articles

Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter