Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Legislative News and Views - Rep. Peggy Bennett (R)

Back to profile

Legislative News from Rep. Peggy Bennett

Thursday, February 29, 2024

Dear Friends,


Is it appropriate for society to protect children from things like obscenity, pornography, and age-inappropriate extreme content and views? Should children be protected from this explicit material while in school?


This week, in the House Education Policy Committee, members were introduced to the Governor’s new 2024 education policy bill. This bill contains many different legislative proposals. One provision in the bill is titled, “Book Banning Prohibited.” 


“We don’t ban books in Minnesota,” our Governor has stated.  That has a handy ring to it.  Who wouldn’t like that slogan? Given we live in a country with the constitutional right of free speech, this sounds reasonable, right? 


As a former elementary school teacher of 33 years, I treasure children. They are one of the greatest reasons I chose to seek this office. Children are precious and they are our future. I do not want to see them harmed.


An important part of my job is to research and dig into the details of proposed laws so we can understand the real ramifications. That’s what I’ve done for this provision. What I have found is highly concerning.


There are two basic parts to this proposed legislation.


First, it states that no school board or other governing body can “ban, remove, or otherwise restrict access to a book or other material based on the viewpoint, content, message, idea, or opinion conveyed.” This language covers school libraries or any library that receives state funding. It could even include a book corner in a classroom.


Secondly, the law dictates that only one person, a “qualified librarian,” gets to decide what books are selected or removed from a school library, and any removal must adhere to the strict criteria above. This leaves parents, teachers, administrators, and school boards totally out of the picture.


This is another one-size-fits-all government mandate that strips power from local school boards, teachers, administrators, and parents and puts it into the hands of state bureaucrats.


School districts currently have a process, developed by locally elected school boards, for how to remove books deemed age inappropriate from school libraries. Under this bill, that local process will disappear.


What if the person who orders books for a school has a personal or political agenda? What if he or she innocently chooses a recommended award-winning book without reading it only to find later that it contains obscene or pornographic material? 


Much of the language in this bill is conflicting and some unclear. It is quite possible that literature which would not survive the state mandated porn filter for school technology would not be able to be challenged under this law.  


What is clear is that once a book is in a school library it would most likely be impossible to remove. This would include literature containing obscene or pornographic material, or extreme opinions such as calling for the extermination of Israel. It also appears that the bill would essentially end age-appropriate sections in libraries. What is good for a twelfth grader will be good for a kindergartener.  


Good luck to parents who want to challenge materials they deem inappropriate for their child. While one portion of Minnesota law allows parents to challenge curriculum or assignments for their child, this proposed law would make it impossible for school boards, teachers, or administrators to respond to that challenge. “Sorry, but the state says we must keep this in our school libraries and classrooms.”


Using the term “book ban” in this way makes a mockery of what true book bans are. Simply making a book unavailable in a school library is not a book ban. This conflates the correct societal function of protecting children from age-inappropriate materials in schools with images such as Nazi Germany’s criminalization of literature or North Korea where one can be imprisoned for simply owning a Bible. 


Since when is protecting children from explicit material while in school a bad thing? As a society, we understand that some things are not appropriate for children – and that includes some books. We have warnings on music, television, video games, movies, etc. We have laws against children’s exposure to obscenity, pornography, and indecent exposure. This is because we understand that the developing brains of children are vulnerable and easily manipulated.


Ironically, while we have some in our state calling for “no book bans” in schools, half of Minnesota students cannot read at grade level. The sad reality is that every book is “banned” for a child who is unable to read.


The filtering of age-inappropriate school materials is an appropriate function of society. For schools, this decision belongs at the local level with locally elected school board members, parents, teachers, librarians, and administrators. This government mandated take-over of local control does not belong in Minnesota.



I had a wonderful visit at my office this week with two local firefighters, Captain Bart Berven and Deputy Chief Jeff Laskowske of the Albert Lea Fire Department. We discussed a number of important issues and concerns, including local ambulance service in Freeborn County and the challenges surrounding fire safety and fire suppression for lithium-ion batteries. I am fully convinced that my most valuable input comes from local "boots on the ground" people like these two. Thank you to Bart and Jeff for coming to the Capitol today and meeting with me, and thank you to all of our first responders for everything you do to keep us safe. We appreciate you!



This week, the Minnesota House of Representatives had the privilege of having a local student, Issac Hartman, as a student page. Issac is a homeschool student from the Wells area. The High School Page Program is open to all Minnesota high school students in their junior year. These young people not only get to work as a page for a week, but also experience many other aspects of government. I had a great visit with Issac in my office where we discussed many different legislative topics. He’s a sharp young man with a real interest in law and in government. 


Thanks for joining us here at the Capitol, Issac. It was great to meet you!


Have a good weekend,