Is it the judgment of the House that the Anderson, S., point of order is well taken?
60 YEA and 71 Nay
Date: 04/04/2012
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
| Allen | | Anderson, S. | | Anzelc | | Banaian | | Benson, J. | |
| Brynaert | | Carlson | | Champion | | Davids | | Dill | |
| Dittrich | | Downey | | Eken | | Falk | | Fritz | |
| Gauthier | | Gunther | | Hamilton | | Hansen | | Hausman | |
| Hilstrom | | Hilty | | Hosch | | Huntley | | Johnson | |
| Kath | | Knuth | | Koenen | | Laine | | Lanning | |
| LeMieur | | Lenczewski | | Liebling | | Lillie | | Loeffler | |
| Mariani | | Marquart | | Mazorol | | Melin | | Moran | |
| Morrow | | Mullery | | Murphy, E. | | Murphy, M. | | Nelson | |
| Norton | | Paymar | | Pelowski | | Persell | | Petersen, B. | |
| Poppe | | Quam | | Rukavina | | Slawik | | Slocum | |
| Smith | | Thissen | | Tillberry | | Wagenius | | Wardlow | |
Those who voted in the negative were:
| Abeler | | Anderson, B. | | Anderson, D. | | Anderson, P. | | Barrett | |
| Beard | | Benson, M. | | Bills | | Buesgens | | Cornish | |
| Crawford | | Daudt | | Davnie | | Dean | | Dettmer | |
| Doepke | | Drazkowski | | Erickson | | Fabian | | Franson | |
| Garofalo | | Gottwalt | | Greene | | Gruenhagen | | Hackbarth | |
| Hancock | | Holberg | | Hoppe | | Hornstein | | Hortman | |
| Howes | | Kahn | | Kelly | | Kieffer | | Kiel | |
| Kiffmeyer | | Kriesel | | Leidiger | | Lesch | | Lohmer | |
| Loon | | Mack | | Mahoney | | McDonald | | McElfatrick | |
| McFarlane | | McNamara | | Murdock | | Murray | | Myhra | |
| Nornes | | O'Driscoll | | Peppin | | Peterson, S. | | Runbeck | |
| Sanders | | Scalze | | Schomacker | | Scott | | Shimanski | |
| Simon | | Stensrud | | Swedzinski | | Torkelson | | Urdahl | |
| Vogel | | Ward | | Westrom | | Winkler | | Woodard | |
| Zellers |
|